Message -
From: off_world_beings
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:32 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernha...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernha...@... wrote:
Thanks for your alternating comments. I read them.
Not sure what to say except, Oh Yeah, you live in
Scotland, truely a mystical place I wish to check
out someday since I have a good amount of Scottish
in me. My Grandfather
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernhardt@ wrote:
Thanks for your alternating comments. I read them.
Not sure what to say except, Oh Yeah, you live in
Scotland, truely a mystical place I wish to check
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Kirk kirk_bernha...@...
wrote:
the most effective way to establish that state is by alternating the
practice of transcending with activity. the easiest way to do this
is through the regular (2x a day) practice of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote:
Let's face it, the TMO would be a lot healthier if people had sex
(and chicken sandwiches) on a more regular basis.
According to who ?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, I am the eternal
l.shad...@... wrote:
I didn't get all that excited when I was last on IA (ended a couple
weeks
ago) and I didn't notice all that much excitement amongst the
people I spoke
with compared to last year or the year before.
Very good !
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Me, EnlightenDawn and Raunch sit around, smoking grasshopper weed
and engage in mental tantric practices between the domes. Oh, by the
way, many years
Enlightenment is different in different states of consciousness. Different
tantras will evoke the state of conceptless light vision direct with sight,
or work perhaps in less elaborated centers with other formless and
unformulable mental or energy states. To at the state of sound and vision to
---Yes, interesting!. Once, (half in jest), somebody told Charlie
Lutes something about transcending. He replied with a
question: Do you mean somebody physically dissolved into white
Light, disappearing from view? (to paraphrase).
The lesson: the term transcendence usually applies to a
I had some meditation experiences. I would see lights of all colors,
pretty much the entire time. Other things read like 'day and night'
experiences of the Buddhist tantric - fireflys, smoke, crosses, eternal
knots, melting, expanding, and typical kundalini signs like feeling on fire
for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote:
---Yes, interesting!. Once, (half in jest), somebody told Charlie
Lutes something about transcending. He replied with a
question: Do you mean somebody physically dissolved into white
Light, disappearing from view? (to
Very good ! Excitement = entropy.
Unfortunately the citizens of Fairfield, except for a very few bright
individuals, understands the power behind and blessings bestowed upon
their town since the early 70's.
When MUM and the meditators leave, and they finally will, the town
will be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernha...@...
wrote:
Very good ! Excitement = entropy.
Unfortunately the citizens of Fairfield, except for a very few
bright
individuals, do not understand the power behind and blessings
bestowed upon
their town since the early
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my
little chiquita.
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no
longer identifies with, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , TurquoiseB no_re...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com ,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , grate.swan no_re...@...
wrote:
A corrupt marketing tool and identity crutch used by those who feel
that the natural culmination of life processes is something that can
be packaged, sold and owned.
This ironically
Some things have no definition!
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, grate.swan no_re...@...
wrote:
A corrupt marketing tool and identity crutch used by those who feel
that the natural culmination of life processes is something that can
be packaged, sold and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Marek Reavis
reavisma...@... wrote:
I also acknowledge that I have an aspect of my mind that is an
unchanging witness of my personality. It is an artifact of
consciousness and a part of being human if you choose to
-You say There's no one there then admit that some aspect of mind
(even though inseparable from the ground of Being, is able to comment
upon that fact).
Therefore, your statement regarding no one is false.
There is somebody there within and as Brahman; namely some
body/mind. As long as you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote:
-You say There's no one there
I didn't say there is no-one there. You read it completely wrongly. I
think you should go back and try again.
OffWorld
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote:
I'd be a fool to reduce my conceptual understanding of him to some
sort of un-enlightened con artist.
I am not attempting to be argumentative or challenging, nor do I have
an agenda regarding the Maharishi. I am simply
: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:10 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which
a person no
longer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
bravo monkey! chatter, chatter, chatter. are you done playing with
your banana, and have decided to begin chattering again?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
ED, I have noticed
.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote:
From: Peter drpetersutp...@...
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
Enlightenment is not what you think.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote:
--you say, to paraphrase: (according to MMY, those are good words).
But You can not get enlightened are your words, not his.
He didn't often use the E word (if ever) in the context of a
progression from CC - BC - UC; but he
/27/09, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
From: Peter drpetersutphen@
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of
enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
Enlightenment is not what you think.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09
within itself. From here to
here
through there according to Maharishi. Those are good words.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
From: Peter drpetersutphen@
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of
enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifuxero@ wrote:
--you say, to paraphrase: (according to MMY, those are good words).
But You can not get enlightened are your words, not his.
He didn't often use the E
.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, yifuxero yifux...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: yifuxero yifux...@yahoo.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 11:00 PM
--you say, to paraphrase: (according to MMY, those are good
. Those are good words.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
From: Peter drpetersutphen@
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of
enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
--- On Wed, 1/28/09, boo_lives boo_li...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: boo_lives boo_li...@yahoo.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 12:27 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog
blowing. One big
yoni, one big lingam. Stand back!
--- On Wed, 1/28/09, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
From: enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:27 PM, boo_lives wrote:
That a (shocking small) percentage of long term sidhas have had from
here to here advaita experiences doesn't prove anything about what
MMY really taught and nurtured in his followers. Reality is from
here to here, people in every spiritual movt
Don't worry, we've set the blade extra low on the akashic landmower.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:40 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
lol-- i got as far as the grasshopper living among the weeds and
then got lost...
of pure
consciousness. They always were functioning like this, but a
delusion of a you was present.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote:
From: yifuxero yifux...@...
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date
and you know this, monkey, from your VAST EXPERIENCE with TM,
right??? lets see, 4 years worth according to you, several decades
ago...yup, qualifies for a banana...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:27 PM, boo_lives wrote:
That a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@...
wrote:
It is amazing that more people are not Realized in the TMO. One
reason, as you imply, is that Maharishi was way too successful in
creating a waking state model that explained enlightenment. People
have become trapped in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:27 PM, boo_lives wrote:
That a (shocking small) percentage of long term sidhas have had from
here to here advaita experiences doesn't prove anything about what
MMY really taught and nurtured in his
On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:02 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
and you know this, monkey, from your VAST EXPERIENCE with TM,
right??? lets see, 4 years worth according to you, several decades
ago...yup, qualifies for a banana...
Four years?
Not according to me!
--Thx raunch. I like you.
Short of defining them, it's easier to say that Neo-Advaitins focus
solely on Being or whatever term they use (perhaps the Self); but
without giving an account of their transition through the relative
layers of existence and diminishing the importance of everything
...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 4:56 PM
agreed-- really well said dr. pete. enlightenment is real, viable
and experienced- - just not by -thinking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:02 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
and you know this, monkey, from your VAST EXPERIENCE with TM,
right??? lets see, 4 years worth according to you, several
decades
ago...yup, qualifies for a banana...
On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:23 PM, boo_lives wrote:
Of course you nailed that one right on the head--and let's not forget
that these are now coached advaita experiences ever since MMY
presided over the course dredging for moods. People are being
encouraged to moodmake their own projected
c'mon monkey, you're just making shit up to fit your prejudices--
the reason no one tells you anything except the crumbs you can find
scampering under the table is that you're too full of yourself to
even hear it. have a banana and stfu.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
You can not get enlightened. This is very true. In waking state
there is an experience of an individuality; a private psychological
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net wrote:
Of course you nailed that one right on the head--and let's not forget that
these are now *coached* advaita experiences ever since MMY presided over
the course dredging for moods. People are being encouraged to moodmake
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:23 PM, boo_lives boo_li...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
Could you say more about the script - I'm curious what flavor of
enlightenment experience has gotten the approval. Is it still going on
now that mmy is gone?
ruthsimplicity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no
longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of perception.
This sounds like the I don't care anymore
Thanks for taking the time to openly respond to this question. Your
openness is appreciated.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:12 PM, I am the eternal wrote:
Been there, done that, plan to go back and do it again.
There is no script given to the IA CPs. There is no script.
However TMO people will
: Peter drpetersutphen@
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of
enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
Enlightenment is not what you think.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, ruthsimplicity
no_re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltabl...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my
little chiquita.
enlightenment is that state of consciousness
words.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Peter
drpetersutphen@ wrote:
From: Peter
drpetersutphen@
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re:
More definitions of
enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifuxero@ wrote:
--In other words, mind is a secondary witness to Witnessing; a fact
even the Neo-Advaitins can't deny. (some mind-entity - illusory or
not - is making
Let's face it, the TMO would be a lot healthier if people had sex (and chicken
sandwiches) on a more regular basis.
--- On Wed, 1/28/09, raunchydog raunchy...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: raunchydog raunchy...@yahoo.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
On Jan 28, 2009, at 6:57 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifuxero@ wrote:
--In other words, mind is a secondary witness to Witnessing; a fact
even the Neo-Advaitins can't deny. (some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, I am the eternal l.shad...@...
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to openly respond to this question. Your
openness *is* appreciated.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:12 PM, I am the eternal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM, boo_lives boo_li...@yahoo.com wrote:
The experience has to fit in with Maharishi's teachings and not be
conjecture. I had a number of sentences struck out because,
according to
Doug B, the experiences could not be verified.
snip
What nonsense. The only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutp...@... wrote:
Let's face it, the TMO would be a lot healthier if people had sex
(and chicken sandwiches) on a more regular basis.
Grasshopper gives Peter one leg up for chicken sandwich idea and two
legs up for sex.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifuxero@ wrote:
--In other words, mind is a secondary witness to Witnessing; a fact
even the
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my
little chiquita.
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no
longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of perception.
this can't be accomplished on the thinking level. it is not about
thinking,
i meant Transcendental MEDitation, not MADitation, though at times
along the way i confess to have felt quite crazy.:)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my
little chiquita.
On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:50 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
the most effective way to establish that state is by alternating the
practice of transcending with activity. the easiest way to do this
is through the regular (2x a day) practice of Transcendental
Maditation, or TM.
Interesting how it
On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:53 AM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
i meant Transcendental MEDitation, not MADitation, though at times
along the way i confess to have felt quite crazy.:)
It was just a Freudian slip, I wouldn't worry too much about it.
And about the crazy feelings, yes we all noticed,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my
little chiquita.
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no
longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of
A corrupt marketing tool and identity crutch used by those who feel
that the natural culmination of life processes is something that can
be packaged, sold and owned.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my
little chiquita.
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no
longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of
the most effective way to establish that state is by alternating the
practice of transcending with activity. the easiest way to do this
is through the regular (2x a day) practice of Transcendental
Maditation, or TM.
---Ah if you must know I started feeling the all oneness thing about six
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernha...@... wrote:
And wearing Shiva around ones neck is a very close and personal
tantra in any case. Sitting at a bar, seing Shiva twinkling in an
offered line, and thank you Lord.
I would be more inclined to believe you saw a god in the
curtisdeltablues wrote:
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no
longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of perception.
You know this sounds like a made-up problem to solve. I never met
anyone who was lost in or identified with the objects of
i can relate to the mystical avenues for gaining enlightenment also.
but those come and go, and are a less reliable path for the
establishment of non-identification. more a validation of the
worthiness of the path, than a means to establish Being.
also the use of drugs to enable mystical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Identity is non-physical
with the intent to reach a deeper clarity about it? Or do you think
I'm just slinging Advaita shit that can safely be dismissed? Does ya
got twelve in the juryroom still?
My identity is not physical.
i was never able to learn touch typing, so i am not able to correct
as i type, only through proofreading afterwards. thanks for your
concern, though... have a banana, you've earned another one today,
oh cuddly and cute king of monkeys!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@...
you are trying so hard today, curt, and your reward is due-- enjoy a
banana!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
you are trying so hard today, curt, and your reward is due-- enjoy a
banana!
Who is Curt?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In
Curtis,
Under no circumstances are you to take a banana from ED11.
Not that there's anything wrong with that! - Jerry Seinfeld
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
you are trying so hard today, curt, and your reward is due-- enjoy a
banana!
excellent starting point!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
you are trying so hard today, curt, and your reward is due--
enjoy a
banana!
Who is Curt?
I also acknowledge that I have an aspect of my mind that is an
unchanging witness of my personality. It is an artifact of
consciousness and a part of being human if you choose to spend enough
time to notice it. I'll even acknowledge that meditating helps you
notice this aspect of your mind more
--In other words, mind is a secondary witness to Witnessing; a fact
even the Neo-Advaitins can't deny. (some mind-entity - illusory or
not - is making various claims). What is the value of having those
experiences.?
If there is value in such experiences why aren't those
experiencing It
why, the bananas come from the forest, my little chiquita! they grow
in big bunches there, and are ripe for the monkeys to eat. us humans
don't insert them anywhere except our mouths. does my little chiquita
put them other places? can you describe please, my little chiquita?
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote:
--In other words, mind is a secondary witness to Witnessing; a fact
even the Neo-Advaitins can't deny. (some mind-entity - illusory or
not - is making various claims). What is the value of having those
experiences.?
That
interesting-- what do you mean by mind is a secondary witness to
witnessing? i enjoy the paradox of witnessing occuring on its own,
by virtue of the witness (atman), but it needs the mind to express
the definition of witnessing, in order to communicate anything at
all about it. wouldn't it be
bravo monkey! chatter, chatter, chatter. are you done playing with
your banana, and have decided to begin chattering again?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person no
longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of perception.
This sounds like the I don't care anymore definition of enlightenment.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
enlightenment is that state of consciousness in which a person
no
longer identifies with, and gets lost in, the objects of
perception.
Enlightenment is not what you think.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
From: ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:10 PM
for the red pill) Remember -- all I am offering is the truth,
nothing more.
(Neo takes the red pill and swallows it with a glass of water)
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
From: ruthsimplicity no_re...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More
Now Raunch, did you pull that from memory?
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, raunchydog raunchy...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: raunchydog raunchy...@yahoo.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 9:16 PM
there
according to Maharishi. Those are good words.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Peter drpetersutp...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Peter drpetersutp...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
drpetersutp...@...
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 8:18 PM
Enlightenment is not what you think.
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, ruthsimplicity
no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
From
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltabl...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@ wrote:
your definitions all sound so monkey-like. here's a banana, my
little chiquita.
enlightenment is that state of consciousness
...@...
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: More definitions of enlightenment
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 9:16 PM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Enlightenment is not what you think.
Morpheus: I know exactly what you mean
Snake! It's a snake! Calm down folks, GrateSwan thought his shoelace
was a snake but now that he has blown his nose (properly) and he has
greater mental clarity, everyone can put away their snake bite kit.
Swan apologizes for panicking. He realizes identifying with the snake
was a mistake of his
93 matches
Mail list logo
