--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>TurquoiseB wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Of course, the idea that the Pandavas represen 5 virtues ala Raja
> Yoga is impossible. They
> > have to represent 5 chakras even though Chakra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister wrote:
> >
> > And according to Taimni, "hRraya" (heart) in III 35 refers
> > to anaahata-cakra (an-aahata):
> >
>
> Bhoja's comment on that suutra:
>
> hRdayaM s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Of course, I a
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>TurquoiseB wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
>
>
>
>
DOES consider important?
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Of course, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And according to Taimni, "hRraya" (heart) in III 35 refers
> to anaahata-cakra (an-aahata):
>
Bhoja's comment on that suutra:
hRdayaM shariirasya pradesha-visheSas tasminn adhomukha-svalpa-
puNDariikaabhyantare 'nt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Of course, the idea that the Pandavas represen 5 virtues ala Raja
Yoga is impossible. They
> have to represent 5 chakras even though Chakra is never mentioned
in the Gita or the
> Yoga Sutras
Well, actually it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is
> > > actually a different physic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sahadeva=coccyx center=restraint (muladhara chakra)
>
> sahadeva (%{saha4-}) mfn. *with the gods*[emph. added] MBh. BhP. ; m.
> N. of a R2shi (wit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is
> > actually a different physical state than spontaneous
> > transcending, and that the former is an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Sahadeva=coccyx center=restraint (muladhara chakra)
sahadeva (%{saha4-}) mfn. *with the gods*[emph. added] MBh. BhP. ; m.
N. of a R2shi (with the patr. %{vArSAgira}) RV. i , 107 ; of a man
(with the patr. %{zAJjaya
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Of course, I assume that intentional transcending is
> actually a different physical state than spontaneous
> transcending, and that the former is an illusion,
> while the latter is based on a simple physical change
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > > The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's
> important!
> > > Unfolding of the chakras unfold powers of morality, self control,
> > > chas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's
important!
> > Unfolding of the chakras unfold powers of morality, self control,
> > chastity, descrimination, etc. That is why we meditate, and the
> > unfol
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
> >>> >> He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
> >>> >> of other spiritual subjects) bec
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> >>>Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
> >>>
> >>>
> >>DOES consider important?
> >>
> >>
> >>>Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
> >>>
> >>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > MMY calls these marmas and thinks there are about 108 of them
> > > IIRC. Of these 3 are most important.
>
> 107 as I recall from working with an indian who trained for many years
> in the tradition that ma
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> snip>
>
> > What the hell is this third eye and why do you think it is important?
>
>
>
> The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's importa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > Before anyone freaks out and considers this
> > > "anti-TM," it's not.
> >
>
> > W
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
> > > advanced t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand
> > he gave me an
> > > advanced technique wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- sparaig wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When I spent some time with Brahmachari
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Haven't any of you guys considered the
> obvious?
> >>> >> He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
> >>> >> of other spiritual subjects) because he
> doesn't
> >>> >> kn
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?
on 9/3/06 2:19 PM, Bhairitu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
>> He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
&g
> >
> > MMY calls these marmas and thinks there are about 108 of them
> > IIRC. Of these 3 are most important.
107 as I recall from working with an indian who trained for many years
in the tradition that maintains the knowledge of marmas in southern
India. Danur Veda. And one hidden one. (thus 10
TurquoiseB wrote:
>>>Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
>>>
>>>
>>DOES consider important?
>>
>>
>>>Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
>>>
>>>
>>In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a pandora's
>>box
>>with this more e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip>
> What the hell is this third eye and why do you think it is important?
The third eye is the portal to infinity, that's why it's important!
Unfolding of the chakras unfold powers of morality, self control,
chas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> >
> > > Before anyone freaks out and considers this
> > > "anti-TM," it's not.
> >
>
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > Before anyone freaks out and considers this
> > "anti-TM," it's not.
>
> Why, *of course* it's not anti-TM (or anti-MMY).
> How could anybody think ac
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before anyone freaks out and considers this
> "anti-TM," it's not.
> If you think I'm wrong about this, try to
> remember when he *has* talked about other spir-
> itual traditions, like the times he's conveyed
> compl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Haven't any of you guys considered the obvious?
> > He doesn't speak about chakras (and thousands
> > of other spiritual subjects) because he doesn't
> > know anything about them.
Ha, haI enjoyed this and your posts b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff. For instance, creative
> intelligence for shakti.
I think you hit the nail on the head, MMY simplified everything and
made it more appealing to a world wide audience..hence
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I quoted from Wikipedia:]
> > In Hinduism and in some related Asian cultures, a chakra is
> > thought to be a nexus of metaphysical and/or biophysical energy
> > residing in the human body
>
> MMY calls these marmas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
wrote:
> >
> > When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
> > advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra in a
> > particul
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
> advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra
> in a particular location.
Me, too.
> Being in India, with an Indian, in an Ind
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand
> > he gave me an
> > > advanced technique wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yaho
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand
> he gave me an
> > advanced technique which involves paying attention
> to the mantra in a
> > particular locatio
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
> wrote:
> >
> > > > Yup, he secularized a lot of th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > > Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic
stuff he
> > > DOES consider important?
> > > > Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> > > Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff. For instance, creative
> > > intelligence for shakt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
> advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra in a
> particular location. Being in India, with an Indian, in an Indian
> ashram,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
> > DOES consider important?
> > > Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
> >
> > In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > Yup, he secularized a lot of the stuff. For instance, creative
> > intelligence for shakti.
> >
>
> I don't think he uses "creative intelligence" as a transl
When I spent some time with Brahmachari Sattyanand he gave me an
advanced technique which involves paying attention to the mantra in a
particular location. Being in India, with an Indian, in an Indian
ashram, I asked him if he meant in the vicinity of the so&so chakra,
but he soon made it very
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic
> > > stuff he DOES consider important?
> > > Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
> >
> > In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open
> > Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
> DOES consider important?
> > Maharishi mentions marmas, and not chakras.
>
> In all fairness to MMY, I don't think he wanted to open a pandora's
> box
> with this more esoteric stuff, who knows, I may not be a meditator n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote:
> >
> > remember what Christ said, no man cometh unto the Father
> > (Brahman) but thru meie. thur the all seeing 'third' eye.
>
> Yep, I'm sure that is what Ch
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I stand corrected. He appears to refer to brahmi shakti as "the
cosmic creative intelligence"
> aka "Mother Divine."
>
> http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/vedant.htm
>
> Rk Veda 1.158.6
>
> Translation: For those (
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel"
wrote:
> >
> > (snip)
> > "I take that back. The mention of chakra appears to be
descriptive
> > rather than prescriptive
> > > (to use Judy's phrase), and ther
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (snip)
> "I take that back. The mention of chakra appears to be descriptive
> rather than prescriptive
> > (to use Judy's phrase), and there is much of interest in this
> upanishad for those who think
> > TM i
(snip)
"I take that back. The mention of chakra appears to be descriptive
rather than prescriptive
> (to use Judy's phrase), and there is much of interest in this
upanishad for those who think
> TM is important rather than thinking that you gotta attend to each
individual leaf (or
> chakra).
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>jim_flanegin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>wmurphy77 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > > Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
> > thingies. There are
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>jim_flanegin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
wmurphy77 wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yah
jim_flanegin wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>jim_flanegin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
wmurphy77 wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLif
sparaig wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>wmurphy77 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>And what does MMY say?
>
>
>
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
> thingies. There are "wheels"
> > mentioned, but not spiritual nexi specifical called "cha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
> thingies. There are "wheels"
> > mentioned, but not spiritual nexi specifical called "cha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
wrote:
> snip
>
> > Or perhaps becaus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>wmurphy77 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu
wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> wmurphy77 wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>And what does MMY say?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>wmurphy77 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick google search yields little about chakras as spiritual
thingies. There are "wheels"
> mentioned, but not spiritual nexi specifical called "chakras." This
appears to be a Tibetan
> Buddhist term,
?
In Hindu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> snip
>
> > Or perhaps because
jim_flanegin wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>wmurphy77 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Indians in general speak of the third eye open ("kundalini has
>>>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> snip
>
> > Or perhaps because
wmurphy77 wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>>>And what does MMY say?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the
>>
>>
>chakras.
>
>
>>It's not that the information isn't important tho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
snip
> Or perhaps because chakras are grafted on after the vedic stuff he
DOES consider important?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > wmurphy77 wrote:
> >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Indians in general speak of the third eye open ("kundal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>
>
> > >And what does MMY say?
> > >
> > >
> > Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the
> chakras.
> > It's not that the information
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> wmurphy77 wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Indians in general speak of the third eye open ("kundalini has
> >>
> >>
> >risen")
> >
> >
> >>as a sign of enlightenmen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> wmurphy77 wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Indians in general speak of the third eye open ("kundalini has
> >>
> >>
> >risen")
> >
> >
> >>as a sign of enlightenmen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >And what does MMY say?
> >
> >
> Like others have mentioned here I never heard him speak of the
chakras.
> It's not that the information isn't important though.
I'm not sure why MMY does not mention opening of the
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
> "jim_flanegin"
> > wrote:
> > > Not sure I understand all of what you said-
> > >
> > > all I can say is that when the third e
wmurphy77 wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Indians in general speak of the third eye open ("kundalini has
>>
>>
>risen")
>
>
>>as a sign of enlightenment.
>>
>>
>
>
>And what does MMY say?
>
>
Like others have mentioned here I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yep, I'm sure that is what Christ meant: "me" = 3rd eye.
Yes, as Christ is *the only begotten* of the Father and is God immanent
IN creation (formless Christ or Buddhic plane of consciousness, the one
life, the one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> wrote:
> > Not sure I understand all of what you said-
> >
> > all I can say is that when the third eye opens (a very weird
> > expression by the way...) the ab
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Indians in general speak of the third eye open ("kundalini has
risen")
> as a sign of enlightenment.
And what does MMY say?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> wrote:
> > Not sure I understand all of what you said-
> >
> > all I can say is that when the third eye opens (a very weird
> > expression by the way...) the ab
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Not sure I understand all of what you said-
>
> all I can say is that when the third eye opens (a very weird
> expression by the way...) the ability is gained to see all manner of
> things without the optic machi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77
wrote:
> > >
> > > I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in
poor
> > > stan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 wrote:
> >
> > I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor
> > standing)and don't really know...any takers? BillyG.
> >
> > (previous subjec
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor
> standing)and don't really know...any takers? BillyG.
>
> (previous subject line cut off)
>
Hi, I think yes, it probably is, though I had such an
86 matches
Mail list logo
