At 7:41 AM -0400 7/10/05, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 01:52 PM 7/10/05 +1000, Rocky Road wrote:
You might be a different Dennis but I'm sure there was a Dennis on
this forum swearing he'd never upgrade software that used
Challenge-Response copy protection. Isn't Sibelius CP even more
Mark D Lew wrote:
[snip] out-of-the-box settings are like, since I always use my own.
Maybe they
suck. If so, MakeMusic could accomplish a lot without touching the
program at all and just making some decent templates.
You know, you may have just said a mouthful with that remark!
If
John Bell wrote:
On 11 Jul 2005, at 02:30, John Bell wrote:
[FinMac 2005b]
There's a really annoying bug in Finale that's been there for years.
When a note with an accidental is tied to the next bar and then tied
again to another note in this same bar, the final note is given a
redundant
dhbailey wrote:
If Finale would make include some templates which are predefined for
various house-styles (Henle, BreitkopfHaertel, BooseyHawkes,
G.Schirmer, Schott, Carl Fischer, Southern Music, Rubank, whatever)
with libraries which include more common dynamic marks, more common
tempo
dhbailey schrieb:
If Finale would make include some templates which are predefined for
various house-styles (Henle, BreitkopfHaertel, BooseyHawkes,
G.Schirmer, Schott, Carl Fischer, Southern Music, Rubank, whatever) with
libraries which include more common dynamic marks, more common tempo
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
dhbailey wrote:
If Finale would make include some templates which are predefined for
various house-styles (Henle, BreitkopfHaertel, BooseyHawkes,
G.Schirmer, Schott, Carl Fischer, Southern Music, Rubank, whatever)
with libraries which include more common dynamic
At 9:18 AM -0400 7/11/05, dhbailey wrote:
I didn't think look-and-feel could be patented/copyrighted/trademarked.
Under U.S. law it can't. European law may be different in this
aspect, judging from comments that have been made from our friends
across the pond.
John
--
John Susie
We've been doing this as long as I can remember...
On 7/10/05 4:33 AM, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] said this:
I'm afraid you are sorely mistaken:
http://www.finalemusic.com/store/specialoffers.aspx
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
And very cynical Americans...
On 7/10/05 4:59 PM, Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said this:
Maybe it was a dry British-type joke that only they and Canadians get,
but it WAS a joke.
--
Allen J. Fisher
Quality Assurance Developer
MakeMusic! Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:55 AM 7/11/2005, you wrote:
Hi all,
I use both Finale and Sibelius. Although the extra steps mentioned here
for Sibelius are exaggerated, nevertheless, there is no way that Sibelius
can match Finale with the economy of keystrokes that Richard is looking for.
If I were faced with a
On Jul 10, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Owain Sutton wrote:
1) The accelerando leads smoothly up to the new tempo, in which case
the instructions should be accelal...9:8 faster (I suspect this
is the case you had in mind.)
Yes, this is the one I had in mind. But this way of indicating it is
On Jul 10, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Sheesh, everyone!
It was a JOKE!
Maybe it was a dry British-type joke that only they and Canadians get,
but it WAS a joke.
Maybe it's something about the e-mail medium, but except for puns and
items with clear joke markers in their
On Jul 11, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On Jul 10, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Sheesh, everyone!
It was a JOKE!
Maybe it was a dry British-type joke that only they and Canadians
get, but it WAS a joke.
Maybe it's something about the e-mail medium, but
That was exactly my thought, too, and I was trying to be funny - well
that didn't quite work...
Johannes
Andrew Stiller schrieb:
On Jul 10, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Sheesh, everyone!
It was a JOKE!
Maybe it was a dry British-type joke that only they and Canadians get,
On 11/07/05, Allen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/10/05 4:33 AM, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] said this:
I'm afraid you are sorely mistaken:
http://www.finalemusic.com/store/specialoffers.aspx
We've been doing this as long as I can remember...
However, it isn't as
On 7/9/05, Noel Stoutenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also the issue of just how accurate Sibelius' claim of 1
users switching from Finale to Sibelius really is. I would expect that
it is true that 1 users took advantage of the competitive upgrade;
however, this was painless,
At 10:20 AM 7/11/2005, you wrote:
At 05:55 AM 7/11/2005, you wrote:
Hi all,
I use both Finale and Sibelius. Although the extra steps mentioned here
for Sibelius are exaggerated, nevertheless, there is no way that Sibelius
can match Finale with the economy of keystrokes that Richard is
On 11 Jul 2005 at 2:01, Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
I do however send back those little postage-paid upgrade offers every
time I get one, with a note saying that I'd love to upgrade as soon as
they get rid of the stupid tethered-copy-protection. I figure that
since it's their dime I can make the
On several big band charts I have engraved recently, as I prepare the score for printing I discover that at about page 8 the display has changed size by about double. In other words, pp. 1-7 show as being at 100% and all 19 staves fit on one page. Then from page 8 to the end, all margins have
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Gerry Kirk wrote:
On several big band charts I have engraved recently, as I prepare the
score for printing I discover that at about page 8 the display has
changed size by about double. In other words, pp. 1-7 show as being
at 100% and all 19 staves fit on one page. Then
On Jul 11, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Gerry Kirk wrote:
On several big band charts I have engraved recently, as I prepare the score for printing I discover that at about page 8 the display has changed size by about double. In other words, pp. 1-7 show as being at 100% and all 19 staves fit on one page.
On 11 Jul 2005 at 16:10, James Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Gerry Kirk wrote:
On several big band charts I have engraved recently, as I prepare
the score for printing I discover that at about page 8 the display
has changed size by about double. In other words, pp. 1-7 show as
I have 2 groups.
group 1 with staff 1, staff 2 and staff 3
group 2 with staff 1 and staff 2
I want to extract in one document only: staff 1 and staff 3 from group 1 and
staff 2 from group 2.
It's possible?
Thanks
Dragos
(Finale 2005, winXP)
Home, no matter how far...
Is there a way to turn every quarter note in a passage into 4 16th notes?
(If not, this seems like something that is missing from the plugin menu
- or the TGTools menu).
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Is there a way to turn every quarter note in a passage into 4 16th notes?
Rhythmic subdivision plugin.
James Gilbert
http://www.jamesgilbertmusic.com/
(using FinWin 2005)
___
Finale mailing list
Thanks, that's what I was looking for.
Johannes
James Gilbert schrieb:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Is there a way to turn every quarter note in a passage into 4 16th notes?
Rhythmic subdivision plugin.
James Gilbert
http://www.jamesgilbertmusic.com/
(using FinWin 2005)
On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Dragos Oltean wrote:
I have 2 groups.
group 1 with staff 1, staff 2 and staff 3
group 2 with staff 1 and staff 2
I want to extract in one document only: staff 1 and staff 3 from group
1 and staff 2 from group 2.
It's possible?
The easiest way to do this is to
On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Dragos Oltean wrote:
I have 2 groups.
group 1 with staff 1, staff 2 and staff 3
group 2 with staff 1 and staff 2
I want to extract in one document only: staff 1 and staff 3 from group
1 and staff 2 from group 2.
It's possible?
The easiest way to do
Technoid said:
Since that time, I have upgraded my Win/XP computer, and noticed the
other day that I hadn't reinstalled Sibelius. (In the back of my mind
I seem to recall that I had to phone Sibelius when I activated my
upgrade version, and decided that I wasn't up to waiting on hold for
Hi!
Am 05.07.2005 um 21:00 schrieb Darcy James Argue:
I believe you could convert MIDI files to AIFF files using QuickTime
Pro
Yes, you can.
-- or even (I think) iTunes.
Never tried that.
Gerhard
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Am 05.07.2005 um 23:20 schrieb Darcy James Argue:
Going over the promo videos for Sib 4, one other thing I notice is that
Sibelius has finally fixed what was one of the most frustrating and
infuriating aspects of its UI back when I was learning to use it -- it
now has an insertion point.
I'm confused by this - isn't AIFF the mac equivalent of a .WAV file? MIDI
files contain no timbral information, so wouldn't there have to be an
intermediate sound card or sampler for the MIDI file to drive to produce
an AIFF?
Ken
Hi!
Am 05.07.2005 um 21:00 schrieb Darcy James
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/finale@shsu.edu/416.html
Isn't there something illegal or unethical about this?
--
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
On Jul 11, 2005, at 9:15 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/finale@shsu.edu/416.html
Isn't there something illegal or unethical about this?
I dunno. The email addresses are erased, even when quoted in a message,
otherwise it's just like any other archive.
On 11 Jul 2005 at 21:32, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jul 11, 2005, at 9:15 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/finale@shsu.edu/416.html
Isn't there something illegal or unethical about this?
I dunno. The email addresses are erased, even when quoted in a
At 09:15 PM 7/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/finale@shsu.edu/416.html
Isn't there something illegal or unethical about this?
There's some other message archive subscribed as well. Frankly, as
long as SHSU isn't providing a proper searchable archive of
At 10:20 PM 7/11/05 -0400, Aaron Sherber wrote:
There's some other message archive subscribed as well. Frankly, as
long as SHSU isn't providing a proper searchable archive of their
own, I see this as a good thing.
Not I. I subscribed to a private list. If this were a Yahoo group, that
would be
There are literally thousands of groups on this list. I see a few others,
like photography groups, that I belong to. I don't know. I think RSS is
probably something like a Google for discussion groups...
Ken
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
In a message dated 7/11/2005 6:17:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't there something illegal or unethical about this?
Wait a second. Let's differentiate between "illegal and unethical" on the one hand, and the realities of cyberspace on the other. In the latter case,
On 11 Jul 2005, at 10:20 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 09:15 PM 7/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/finale@shsu.edu/416.html
Isn't there something illegal or unethical about this?
There's some other message archive subscribed as well. Frankly, as
long as
On 11 Jul 2005, at 8:07 PM, Ken Durling wrote:
I'm confused by this - isn't AIFF the mac equivalent of a .WAV file?
MIDI files contain no timbral information, so wouldn't there have to
be an intermediate sound card or sampler for the MIDI file to drive
to produce an AIFF?
Ken,
QuickTime
41 matches
Mail list logo
