> Another option: add a "git-boostrap" or "git-minimal" package with
> most dependencies removed: Only "curl" is really needed, for support
> of "pull" via http(s). Everything else could be removed with a little
> work. Though some could potentially also replaced by uses of the
> system versions of
from .auto-logs:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.auto-logs/247193
Another process is running. at ./create-finkdb.pl line 167.
Hanspeter
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
auto-logs show this error since January 12:
nice: ./create-finkdb.pl: Permission denied
The RSS/master script is also blocked since about January 16 with this
error:
another process is already running at
/home/fink/cvs/scripts/rss-newpackages.pl line 31.
Hanspeter
---
On 2/13/2013 9:43 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 2/10/13 10:54 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> The last log entry was at 15:40:01 CET, so it's been about 3 hours.
>>
>
> It's now been about 99 hours.
>
> If nobody actually has the time to deal with these things, then we
> should consider moving ou
During configure:
Where do you keep publicly executable scripts? (~name ok)
[/usr/local/scripts]
which then causes the scripts to be installed into /usr/local/scripts,
and the validator doesn't like it:
Validating .deb dir /sw/build.build/root-perl5124-5.12.4-2...
Error: File installed outside of
On 2/24/2013 6:21 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> During configure:
> Where do you keep publicly executable scripts? (~name ok)
> [/usr/local/scripts]
>
> which then causes the scripts to be installed into /usr/local/scripts,
> and the validator doesn't like it:
&g
On 2/24/2013 6:27 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
On 2/24/2013 6:21 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
During configure:
Where do you keep publicly executable scripts? (~name ok)
[/usr/local/scripts]
which then causes the scripts to be installed into /usr/local/scripts,
and the validator
Jack Howarth posted an update to gettext on the tracker a month ago.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=3605792&group_id=17203
This bumps us from 0.18.1.1 to 0.18.2 (I then did a bump to 0.18.2.1).
The update is pretty clean and I've been using it on 10.7 for almost a
m
On 3/26/2013 5:03 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 3/26/13 10:53 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> Jack Howarth posted an update to gettext on the tracker a month ago.
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=3605792&group_id=17203
>
On 7/16/2013 11:13 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 7/16/13 8:11 AM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>> For the past half hour I've been getting
>> cvs commit: [15:07:15] waiting for aida_s's lock in
>> /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/crypto
>> when trying to commit to 10.7/stable/main/finkinf
Since not everyone tracks the SF tracker, I've put an update to
libgettext8/dpkg/libiconv to update our gettext to the latest upstream
0.18.3.1 The changes are minimal, except that I also bumped libiconv to
1.14.
https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4346/
Hanspeter
On 8/23/2013 10:26 AM, TheSin wrote:
> with dpkg 1.16.x coming is it required to update dpkg or should I
> just use your updates in my fork to get it all at once?
I don't think it matters. dpkg links to libgettext8-shlibs, and
0.18.2.1 and 0.18.3.1 should behave the same as far as it is concerne
On 8/25/2013 6:08 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> 1) My bad, I didn't test using -m mode. There's a test failure for
> folks with vala installed. In gettext-tools lang-vala.log:
>
> Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
> In file included from
> /sw/build.build/gettext-tools-0.18.3.1-1/gett
On 9/11/2013 10:01 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 9/11/13 1:59 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I just closed a fink submission tracker item because it was 5 years old and
>> outdated... so I set the status to "closed-out-of-date". But then I noticed
>> the Milestone was still set to "Und
Was updating tar on 10.7 to (B)Dep on libiconv-1.14 and ran into this
problem when it got to TestScript:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../gnu -I../gnu -I../gnu -I../lib
-DLOCALEDIR=\"/sw/share/locale\" -I/sw/include -g -O2 -c argcv.c
CCLD genfile
make check-local
/bin/sh /sw/build.build/
On 9/14/2013 6:00 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
On 13.09.2013, at 14:53, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
Was updating tar on 10.7 to (B)Dep on libiconv-1.14 and ran into this
problem when it got to TestScript:
[...]
Although this has a happy ending, if we ever modify tar test macros
again
On 9/19/2013 2:16 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Package manager version: 0.35.1
> Distribution version: selfupdate-cvs Thu Sep 19 01:58:59 2013, 10.8, x86_64
>
> `fink dumpinfo flac` ends prematurely with
>
> []
> builddependsonly: true
> source: mirror:sourceforge:flac/flac-1.2.1.tar.gz
> source-md
On 9/19/2013 3:19 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 9/19/13 11:54 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> On 9/19/2013 2:16 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>> Package manager version: 0.35.1
>>> Distribution version: selfupdate-cvs Thu Sep 19 01:58:59 2013, 10.8,
>>>
> Subject: fink mirrors no longer reachable
> From: costa...@wanadoo.fr
>
> Whoever is receiving this message: It would be nice if you showed a
> sign of life on the fink-core mailing list. And even better, of
> course, if you could fix the dns records so that the fink mirrors
> network starts to w
> ARCHFLAGS="" /usr/bin/arch -x86_64 perl5.16 Makefile.PL PERL="/usr/bin/arch
> -x86_64 perl5.16" PREFIX=/sw INSTALLPRIVLIB=/sw/lib/perl5/5.16.2
> INSTALLARCHLIB=/sw/lib/perl5/5.16.2/darwin-thread-multi-2level
> INSTALLSITELIB=/sw/lib/perl5/5.16.2
> INSTALLSITEARCH=/sw/lib/perl5/5.16.2/darwin-t
On 12/31/2013 12:56 AM, Jesse Alama wrote:
> Current version of gzip in Fink (on 10.9) is 1.4; latest upstream
> version is 1.6.
It built fine and passed tests for me on 10.7. Only needed %v, MD5 and
removed the BDepends: fink (0.24.12)
Hanspeter
--
On 1/4/2014 1:15 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:46:14 -0800, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
> On 1/2/14 11:07 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:16:00 -0500, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
>>> wrote:
>>> On 12/31/2013 12:56 AM, Jesse A
Dear Fink developers and users,
I've just published the results of a buildworld run on a 10.9 system.
The buildworld tries to build every package in the Fink tree from
scratch on a clean environment and so will find packaging problems that
may be hidden on a production system.
The general repo
On 10/25/2014 2:21 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> It looks like something got broken in the ongoing website changes:
>
> Fiona:faq hansen$ make LANGUAGES=en && make install LANGUAGES=en
> make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> Installing PHP files
> cp -aindex.en.php general.en.php relations.
On 10/25/2014 9:02 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 10/25/14, 6:38 PM, TheSin wrote:
>> and oddly enough I can not get it to work with that now. which is
>> fine I don’t want to have to use that xml thing again anyhow, I just
>> needed the lazy tags fixed so I could work on the pdb, sorry I broke
How does the ongoing openssl100 migration deal with the whole GPL vs
openssl license issue? We could get away with it before because 1)
linking with system-openssl used a system provided library, and 2) we
did not have a binary distribution. However, #2 is no longer valid, and
#1 will also be
On 8/21/2015 5:46 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
> I also have updated gettext packages in my experimental.
Are these from the submissions tracker I filed?
https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4556/
Note that dpkg needs to be updated to use the updated gettext because
(among other thin
On 8/22/2015 10:31 AM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
> Daniel
>
>> On Aug 21, 2015, at 9:39 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/21/2015 5:46 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>>> I also have updated gettext packages in my experimental.
>>
Currently (since 2005), (L)GPL packages that link to Fink's OpenSSL must
be marked as Restrictive because we can't distribute binaries. A note is
usually left in DescPackaging to keep track of the original license.
With system-openssl dying with 10.11, there's going to be a large
increase in pa
On 10/3/2015 3:33 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:18:42 -0500, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
> wrote:
> Currently (since 2005), (L)GPL packages that link to Fink's OpenSSL must
>> be marked as Restrictive because we can't distribute binaries. A note
>> i
I've put updated base packages that use gettext on the tracker. These
bump it to the latest version. There is no libN change to the library
and should be harmless. They built fine for me and passed all tests on
10.11.
https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4586/
Hanspeter
-
On 2/8/17 10:28 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> Hi Fang, (CC: fink-core)
>
> I contacted you last October and this January about updates for mpfr and gmp,
> with new info files attached.
>
> No reply by you. Could you please clarify whether you are still active as
> package maintainer?
FWIW, I contacted h
Forwarded Message
Subject: CVS support at SourceForge and Nov. 30
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 16:21:13 +
From: SourceForge Support
To: f...@snaggledworks.com
Greetings project admin,
We have been planning to discontinue CVS support here at SourceForge for
several years now, an
On 1/2/18 4:24 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
so I recently had some time and motivation to work on a few small
patches for fink. And since things are now on GitHub, I thought it
might be best to submit them as pull requests, so that they can be
reviewed and then merged (as opposed to just pushin
On 12/11/18 11:14 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I was thinking that it might help us if we do the aforementioned merge to
facilitate community testing, etc.
-akh
I'm OK with that. TheSin said he'd added a couple local changes on top
of jwhowarth's pull and been running OK with them. I *think*
On 12/14/18 6:18 AM, Max Horn wrote:
On 12. Dec 2018, at 12:14, Max Horn wrote:
On 12. Dec 2018, at 11:11, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
wrote:
On 12/11/18 11:14 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I was thinking that it might help us if we do the aforementioned merge to
facilitate community
On 12/16/18 9:41 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi all,
thanks for the feedback, I have fixed the ARCHFLAGS now and made the code
generally more robust, adding a new helper Fink::Services::get_sdkpath() which
returns an empty string on Darwin < 18 and the SDK path as returned by `xcrun
--sdk macosx --sh
On 12/16/18 11:00 AM, Justin Hallett wrote:
Hi Core Team,
I have been waiting for dmacks to get back on IRC but that doesn’t seem to be
happening ;)
It’s with sadness that I have to inform everyone that we need to move Snitch in
the next month. I’m not sure if the fink teams would like to ju
in Github, we currently have the 'website' repo that's the up to date
version of our website and docs. There's also a 'web' repo that's a
"temporary and incomplete" conversion of the old CVS web module. Is
there any reason to keep the old 'web' repo?
https://github.com/fink/web <- old
https://
On 1/28/19 6:28 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On Jan 28, 2019, at 03:24, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
wrote:
in Github, we currently have the 'website' repo that's the up to date version of our
website and docs. There's also a 'web' repo that's a "temp
On 10.14, perl5162 fails with the error "ld: library not found for
-lgcc_s.10.4". There are multible threads on fink-users[eg 1]. The
problem is that perl5162 hardcodes MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 and
this finally caught up with us on 10.14
I've submitted a pull request with the fix using up
On 2/5/19 10:56 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Hi, folks.
If for some reason we have any downtime in getting our existing website
infrastructure deployed, I’d like to propose using the website functionality on
GitHub to set up a reduced interim version.
Honestly, if we didn’t need the PDB, I’d r
What's the status of the mirrors? Last I heard they were being
transferred to mischi. Is that still happening?
Hanspeter
___
fink-core mailing list
fink-core@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
Subscript
Maybe we can point it to ns1.finkproject.org and I setup the zone, and
secondary it to he.net like finkproject.org is??
That sounds reasonable. Is there a specific reason to have
finkmirrors.net and finkproject.org have different servers?
Hanspeter
_
On 3/20/19 6:49 AM, Justin Hallett wrote:
I’m guessing we are just going to let the mirrors die? Should I turn it off on
snitch to save resources?
---
TS
http://www.southofheaven.org/
Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
Who has control of the DNS settings?
Hanspeter
__
On 5/29/19 8:45 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
I was able to recover the dotster password for finkmirrors.net and setup as
much of the dns as I could with TheSIn’s help. We are down to a single host.
Does anyone know a place that would help mirror our files? Gecko is sadly gone,
and with it our .e
According to Apple's 10.15beta release notes:
* During upgrades to macOS 10.15, files and folders stored at the
root-level of a volume are moved aside to
/Library/SystemMigration/History/Migration-UUID/QuarantineRoot/. (45378791)
It has a radar#, so hopefully that'll be taken care of before t
On 6/6/19 7:58 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
According to Apple's 10.15beta release notes:
* During upgrades to macOS 10.15, files and folders stored at the
root-level of a volume are moved aside to
/Library/SystemMigration/History/Migration-UUID/QuarantineRoot/. (45378791)
It
Now that Fink HEAD knows about dist 10.14.5 and 10.15, is there any
reason to not merge the updates to fink-distributions so we can have
necessary packages available there (such as perlXXX, texinfo, gccX, etc)?
https://github.com/fink/fink-distributions/pull/423
Hanspeter
___
Can I please get a review for fink PR #200:
https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/200
This makes zsh a known shell inside the pathsetup script. 10.15 defaults
to zsh, so we should make this work for new 10.15 users.
Hanspeter
___
fink-core mailing list
Hi Daniel,
Hope things are OK with you in our current situation.
What's the status of your Fink packages? There are several issues and
pull requests related to Fink's python packages that have not received
any response. Should we proceed with these, especially those that are FTBFS?
https://g
What's the upgrade process for the dpkg1.16 branch and the dists tree?
Several packages are now essential (e.g. time-date-pm and xz) and will
have to be moved from their present subfolders in dists to 'base'. Also,
some base packages have newer versions than what's in the dpkg1.16
branch sourc
nch needs a new tree then it can be
added.
---
TS
http://www.southofheaven.org/
Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos!
On Aug 28, 2020, at 9:59 AM, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
On Aug 28, 2020, at 02:42, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
wrote:
What's the upgrade p
BigSur11.1 broke the kernel version to macOS release mapping that
existed through the entire 10.X series.
Previously, the major kernel version tracked the minor macOS release
(with a -4 offset). So macOS 10.13 is darwin17, 10.15 is darwin19, etc.
The minor kernel version mostly tracked point u
Hi AIDA,
The recent update to Xquartz 2.8 broke the package xinitrc because it
moved xinit from X11/lib/X11/xinit to X11/etc/X11/xinit [1]. I was
hoping to submit a fix for this change but can't find where the
repository might be living. Is it on github? Thanks,
[1] https://github.com/XQuart
On 5/12/21 9:07 AM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I think the Xquartz maintainer is reducing his participation so it might
be quicker to fix it on our end.
On Mon, 10 May 2021, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
Hi AIDA,
The recent update to Xquartz 2.8 broke the package xinitrc because it
moved
Are there any objections *against* merging the dpkg1.16 (now with
dpkg-1.19) into fink-master?
Any outstanding bugs with it might be better dealt with in the main tree
rather than in a forked branch.
Please reply with no-merge or merge.
Hanspeter
--
The appearance of the concept of good and
macOS 14 (Sonoma) just went into release candidate, so the final will
probably be released real soon now. AFAICT, we have support through
14.0RC in master, so in theory a release should be doable.
The new release tracker is at https://github.com/fink/fink/issues/254
There are 3 action items th
58 matches
Mail list logo
