the way toward
apprehending chemistry as an information science”.
Best wishes,
Xueshan Yan
Peking University, FIS Beijing Group
___
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
Dear Pedro,
Dear FIS Colleagues,
Thanks Pedro for his assigning FIS Beijing Group to respond
the current FIS topic about Information Flow, to my
knowledge, there are about 20 books published about this
question, but I only contacted a few of them, the following
three have gave me deep
Dear Pedro, Dear Joseph,
About the Milton Keynes Conference, i.e., about DTMD
definition, we saw this quote long long ago, but there two
different sayings: One is Information is a distinction that
makes a difference from Donald M. MacKay in his
Information, Mechanism and Meaning (1969), and
Dear Rafael,
I am sure you were right in what is communicated between a
sender and a receiver is NOT information but a MESSAGE, I
can provide you more supports from Biology. Between two
nerve cells, between gland cell and target cell, it is
MESSENGERS but not others which carry MESSAGE from
Dear Rafael,
Thank you for the careful explanation!!
About 5 years ago, when I got your Angeletics (messaging
theory) first time, I am very excited on your opinion
message should stress the human side of information (not
your original words, only its main idea), I had my student
translate it
Message -
From: Xueshan Yan mailto:y...@pku.edu.cn
To: 'Joseph mailto:joe.bren...@bluewin.ch Brenner'
Cc: 'Rafael mailto:raf...@capurro.de Capurro'
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: [Fis] It from Bit redux . . . Loss of Information. OFF-LINE
Dear Joseph,
I have two notes
Dear Francesco，
That is all his private, there can't be many people who agree with that
saying, please just skip it!
Xueshan
_
From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Francesco Rizzo
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 10:38 PM
To: Pedro C.
:31 PM
To: y...@pku.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [Fis] [Fwd: RE: It from Bit redux . . . MODERATION] From
Xueshan
Dear Xueshan Yan,
just for you: your thoughts in information and DAO are very important as I
told you (?) in Vienna.
But this is not an issue for scientists. It is a issue for philosophers
Dear Joshi,
No matter what topic/title you used, no matter what goal you want to reach,
your post has raised a very important theory which can decide the future of
information science: Three Level Theory: Molecular (level1), Cellular
(level2), Social (level3). (Please excuse my minor
Xueshan Yan <mailto:yanxues...@gmail.com> has invited you to view the
following document:
<https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/documents/share/images/services/document-4.png
>
Information
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/109viaEymwD1fm2IZ-nY1NsY7TmwqmoSbH0Bawyk
IXXE/edit?usp=shari
Dear Rafael and Moisés,
I write here some compressed words due to the limit of two posts one week.
Beat regards,
Xueshan
==
From: Rafael Capurro [mailto:raf...@capurro.de]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 11:16 PM
To:
<mailto:yanxues...@gmail.com> Xueshan Yan has shared the following PDF:
<https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/documents/share/images/services/pdf-3.png>
Information
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByPvcyabhSoMaWRCTFplU0tuV2c/view?usp=shari
ng_eid=574d7a74> Science：Concept，Syst
Dear colleagues,
The issue Quark Communication raised by Bob and Howard etc. is interesting
and radical; it can help us to clarify that if there is a universal physical
information problem besides black hole information that only is studying by
a few astrophysicists such as Stephen Hawking etc.
ave been given by FIS
colleagues, in fact, most of them have been presented many times before by
different researchers in detail in their works, such as Mark Burgin, 2010;
Robert Logan, 2014; Xueshan Yan, 2016 etc. If possible, I hope we don't spend
so much time doing these repetitive work without kno
Dear Terry and Loet，
I think both of your posts put forward a very important concept to information
studies, i.e., HIERARCHY.
Terry stated: "Communication needs to be more carefully distinguished from mere
transfer of physical differences, …… Any transfer of physical, physical
differences in
Dear FIS Colleagues:
Last week, Sung and I discussed the problem of information in cell language
and human language. Pedro gave his opinion too. I think the Sung’s work is
very important to our information science study.
Biology is an informational science, this is the view of Leroy E. Hood of
transformations.
STAN
Best wishes to all,
Xueshan
===
El feb 10, 2018 5:23 AM, "Xueshan Yan" <y...@pku.edu.cn
<mailto:y...@pku.edu.cn> > escribió:
Dear Colleagues,
I have read the article "The languages
Dear Colleagues,
I have read the article "The languages of bacteria" which Gordana
recommended, and has gained a lot of inspiration from it. In combination
with Sung's comparative linguistics exploration on cell language and human
language, I have the following learning feelings to share with
our bodily reaction to, for example, having
just burned our finger to have been ‘informationally mediated. If not (which
seems possible to me) then my supposition might be OK. But if we think that
neuron communications mediate information, then I am wrong.
STAN
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:
Dear colleagues,
In my teaching career of Information Science, I was often puzzled by the
following inference, I call it Paradox of Meaning and Information or Armenia
Paradox. In order not to produce unnecessary ambiguity, I state it below and
strictly limit our discussion within the human
Dear Mark,
Thank you for expressing your opinion of "Information Is Not Physical" in
concise language. It represents the general view from information science
researchers.
As far as I know, the view of "Information Is Physical?" only appeared in
(natural) science especially in physics. It was
seen any effective explanation of this paradox so far.
Best wishes,
Xueshan
From: Syed Ali [mailto:doctorsyedal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:10 PM
To: Sungchul Ji <s...@pharmacy.rutgers.edu>
Cc: Terrence W. DEACON <dea...@berkeley.edu>; Xueshan Yan <y...@p
22 matches
Mail list logo
