[flashrom] Re: [PATCH] add support for IS25LP016

Hello Ondrej, Thanks for your patch! We are using Gerrit for code reviews, if you could push your changes to Gerrit it would be great! Instructions here: https://flashrom.org/Development_Guidelines#Set_up_your_Gerrit_account_on_review.coreboot.org Anastasia. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:23 AM

[flashrom] Re: Unknown programmer "ft2232_spi"

Hi Michael, Last time I set up environment to build flashrom, I installed all these in order: pciutils libpci-dev libusb-dev libusb-1.0-0-dev libjaylink0 libjaylink-dev cmake libftdi1-dev I haven’t flashed anything with ft2232_spi (however this programmer builds), maybe not entirely relevant to

[flashrom] Application for GSoC 2022

Hello Everyone, I am planning to submit Flashrom’s GSoC application within the next few days. Here are the most important resources that we have prepared for application: Projects Ideas https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AxMobB2v8Dv2uUwZPZ_vCmmONYDJuliHcnjfWOs4qIs/edit?usp=sharing Project

[flashrom] Re: [RFC] Flashrom Development Guidelines - Patch submission

ines, it can also be run through `diff` quite > nicely. Not 100% sure if it would have helped a lot here, moving things > around can create rather confusing diffs. > > I tried to comment as best as I could inline on what was left of the > HTML. > > Nico &g

[flashrom] Flashrom has been accepted for GSoC 2022

Hello Everyone, Breaking news! Flashrom has been accepted as a Mentoring Organization for GSoC 2022! This is amazing news, because for the first time in history, Flashrom is participating in GSoC as independent organisation, has its own Org Admins and an entry in the list of accepted

[flashrom] [RFC] Flashrom Development Guidelines - Patch submission

Hello Flashrom community, Recently, we (Anastasia and Felix, your Org Admins) were looking into the Flashrom Dev Guidelines page https://www.flashrom.org/Development_Guidelines#Patch_submission with the main goal to prepare the page for GSoC. Very soon (7th March) the results are announced, and

[flashrom] Re: Questions About Flashrom Of Gsoc

IRC." > > I went to the "Easy projects" page and decided to start my job with "Find > chips without voltage data." What can I do about it? Could you provide me > with any tips and advice? Thank you very much. > > > > I joined the IRC channel through Libera.

[flashrom] Re: Request for Assistance with FLASHROM

Hi Karani, The place to start is this page: https://www.flashrom.org/GSoC Read all the information, click all the links and read them too. And then you can start setting up your local dev environment. On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:04 AM Karani Vinay Kumar < karani.vinaykum...@gmail.com> wrote: >

[flashrom] Re: Gatekeeping, ACLs and Review Rules

“For example, the flashrom project doesn't require that all comments be resolved before merge. That can be enabled if you'd like, but currently it isn't.” Oh this explains! I was wondering where those “patches merged with unresolved comments” are coming from. I am 100% voting for this setting to

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

Reminder: this is happening tomorrow! 9th March 21.00-22.00 UTC+0 Meeting id is added to meeting notes <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18qKvEbfPszjsJJGJhwi8kRVDUG3GZkADzQSH6WFsKqw/edit?usp=sharing> document. On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:48 PM Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > ATTENTION

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy project and GSoC

Hello Aarya, Nice to meet you! I think I saw your question on the IRC channel, and someone replied, was that your question? Do you still need more info? Let us know if yes. Thanks! On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:42 PM Aarya Chaumal wrote: > Hello there, > > I hope you are well today when you

[flashrom] Re: Questions About Flashrom Of Gsoc

Hello Hui, Nice to meet you! Great to know that you are interested to work with us this Summer of Code! It is very good that you looked into the list of project ideas and are interested in one of them, and your experience in C is very relevant. > What resources can I use to learn more about it?

[flashrom] Re: [GSoC 2022] Restructure Shutdown Function

Hello Joursoir, Nice to have you very interested in flashrom! One thing I wanted to say: it would be great to include the mailing list if you have discussions about the project. That would mean the community can join and potentially help too, and this is really useful. Thomas, thank you so much

[flashrom] Re: Gatekeeping, ACLs and Review Rules

Nico, and everyone, Thanks for many details, and for historical information, always interesting for me to read :) *“The big difference seems to be that at coreboot mergingpatches, i.e. hitting the "Submit" button, is more or less consideredan administrative task unrelated to one's opinion

[flashrom] Re: Questions About Flashrom Of Gsoc

t > further preparation need I take if I wish to join Gsoc this year? > > > > Regards, > > Hui > > *From:* Anastasia Klimchuk > *Sent:* 11 March 2022 08:54 > *To:* Hui Xiang ; flashrom > *Subject:* Re: [flashrom] Questions About Flashrom Of Gsoc &

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy project and GSoC

n" and "fixing endianness issues" > interesting and would like to do that in the summer. Can you suggest > some tasks so that I can know more about these projects and get an > idea of how to write my proposal for GSoC for doing this project? > Thanks :) > > On Thu, Mar 10,

[flashrom] Re: Release preparations

Hello Nico, “I've been scrolling through the commit log from v1.1 (the last release I was involved) to today's master.” I am wondering why v1.1, I know the latest released version is v1.2? Is there anything about v1.2 release why you don’t count it? “I suggest that we freeze the master branch

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

, 2022 at 3:07 AM Felix Singer > wrote: > >> On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 20:10 +1100, Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: >> > Felix, Thomas, thanks for looking into time zones, this is so nice of >> > you! Unfortunately, time interval from 17.00 to 19.30 is impossible for >

[flashrom] Re: Call for Mentors for GSoC 2022

Hi Carl-Daniel, Thank you so much for reading the projects list and for sharing your thoughts! It seems you touched two topics in your email: first one is feedback on gsoc projects, and second one is unit tests vs testing on real hardware. In general, the project descriptions at this stage do

[flashrom] Re: Application for GSoC 2022

Application submitted! On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:02 PM Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am planning to submit Flashrom’s GSoC application within the next few > days. > > Here are the most important resources that we have prepared for > application: >

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

local time! :) Meeting room id will be organised very soon and added to the meeting notes <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18qKvEbfPszjsJJGJhwi8kRVDUG3GZkADzQSH6WFsKqw/edit?usp=sharing> document. On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:54 PM Felix Singer wrote: > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 19:51 +1100,

[flashrom] Re: Questions About Flashrom Of Gsoc

gt; Thanks for your reply and suggestions. > > > > >You can do one of "Fix scan-build issues". > > > > In the description of this task, it said, “Run scan-build in the tree.” I > am a little confused about the words “in the tree.” How can I find it? > > > > Reg

[flashrom] Re: Gatekeeping, ACLs and Review Rules

t time the patch was reviewed Last time patch was send to review Last time patch was merged How long active on the project Any topics on the mailing list Reachable via email or channel ….. On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:44 AM Nico Huber wrote: > > Hi Anastasia, > > On 17.03.22 12:32, Anastasi

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy project and GSoC

I realised one thing that I need to answer: > I have completed a rough draft for my proposal, can someone review it? So just to be very very clear: the answer is no, we won't be pre-reviewing your proposal(s). You will submit them to the gsoc website, they will go through the system and then

[flashrom] Re: Inquiry about a required task for GSOC.

Hello Israa, Thank you for contacting us! Unfortunately, "Modernize the flashrom website" project is not available for GSoC 2022 anymore. I really apologize for the inconvenience, and confusion. The reason is, we had some discussion recently about the project and realised that the project is not

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy projects

Hi Prakhar, It is nice to know that you are interested in Flashrom. However, by the nature of our projects students need to have a deep level of knowledge and experience in C language. I would encourage you to learn more C, and maybe find out the answers to your questions by yourself. Good Luck!

[flashrom] Re: EU/AU flashrom dev meeting appointment time change

Hello People, I wanted to say that the meeting will be happening this week! If you have any preferences for days/times, please vote on the poll, it is not too late. At the moment there are 3 slots on Thursday that look good, and if there are no other votes we will pick one of them (that would be

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

tps://docs.google.com/document/d/18qKvEbfPszjsJJGJhwi8kRVDUG3GZkADzQSH6WFsKqw/edit?usp=sharing> document. On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:08 AM Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > Reminder: this is happening tomorrow! 9th March 21.00-22.00 UTC+0 > Meeting id is added to meeting notes > <https://docs.goo

[flashrom] Re: Release preparations

.” Thanks Martin! There is a patch currently for man page: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62768 But did you mean more than that? On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:56 AM Nico Huber wrote: > On 13.03.22 16:28, Nico Huber wrote: > > On 13.03.22 08:28, Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > >>&

[flashrom] Re: Adding some details to the dev guidelines wiki page

Thanks Nikolai! Since there was no feedback, I updated the page :) On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:24 PM Nikolai Artemiev wrote: > Hi everyone! > > As a follow up to https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58477 and > https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/58480, I want to update > the section

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy project and GSoC

Hi Aarya, I fully agree with Simon, you are doing great! I have just submitted the first one out of your patches, congrats! Well done :) Few more of them seem to be almost ready, just some comments about commit messages need to be resolved. Don't be surprised that you are getting so many

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy project and GSoC

I can add a few bits from me. You can only do one project as gsoc, because the rules say so: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules See 7.3.b The rules also say that you can submit up to 3 proposals, but only one of them we can select. In theory, you can write 2 proposals for 2 projects that

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 21:49 +1100, Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > One good idea came up recently: to organize a “Flashrom Developers > > Meeting” so that we can talk to each other, discuss current > > development and future plans! The idea is, speci

[flashrom] Re: Call for Mentors for GSoC 2022

m the brainstorming are mine, I would also > offer to help as (co)mentor for GSoC on those projects. > > -- Thomas > > On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 22:31 +1100, Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > > Good Day Flashrom People! > > > > As you might know already, we are currently preparing an

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

Greg, thanks for explaining your point of view! I think there are more people with the same point of view, they are just not replying to the mailing list. So that’s important. In general, I think it’s better to start trying one thing and then the other, collect experience and then eventually

[flashrom] Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

Hello Everyone, One good idea came up recently: to organize a “Flashrom Developers Meeting” so that we can talk to each other, discuss current development and future plans! The idea is, specifically, to have it regularly - and once a month seems just about right. The attendance will be,

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting once a month?

:10 +1100, Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > > Felix, Thomas, thanks for looking into time zones, this is so nice of > > you! Unfortunately, time interval from 17.00 to 19.30 is impossible for > > me, sorry :( > > 19.30 - 20.30 I can try, it can be better or worse depending on the

[flashrom] Re: Call for Mentors for GSoC 2022

n do code review, real HW-testing and similar actions supporting the > mentor and/or contributor. > > > > So when there will be a mentor for this topic, he/she is welcome to get in > touch with me to see if/how I can help. > > > > Regards, > > > > Simon > &g

[flashrom] Call for Mentors for GSoC 2022

Good Day Flashrom People! As you might know already, we are currently preparing an application for GSoC 2022 (also known as Google Summer of Code, FAQ ). We have gathered a list of Project Ideas, and it's time to call for Mentors! If you are

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom project ideas (for GSoC)

Nico and everyone who did the brainstorming, Thank you so much!! This is amazing, and exactly what we need at the moment! As a first step, I merged everything into our ideas doc , and as a result we

[flashrom] Re: EU/AU flashrom dev meeting appointment time change

is optimised for EU/US. However, if you are in the US and you are okay with this time (start between 11pm and 2am) you are welcome to join of course! Thank you everyone. On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:25 PM Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > > Hello People, > > I wanted to say that

[flashrom] Re: EU/AU flashrom dev meeting appointment time change

the following time work for you between Apr and Sept? Thursday 6.00-7.00 am UTC+0 which is Wednesday 11pm-Midnight Pacific Time UTC-7 Thursday Midnight-1am Mountain Time UTC-6 Thank you! On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 9:30 AM Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > > ATTENTION ATTENTION > > We are lock

[flashrom] Re: Join GSoC

Hi Sayed, You should start by reading our guidelines here: https://www.flashrom.org/GSoC On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:22 AM Sayed Mohsen wrote: > > I also need to know if am I late for joining or its good time for me to join > Thank you > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 5:59 PM Sayed wrote: >> >> Hello

[flashrom] Re: GSOC 2022

Hi Wynn, Nice to have you interested in Flashrom! Yes of course we are interested in applicants for 2022, it is the good time now: the application window has just opened a few days ago. > As many of the projects require programmers, flash chips, and hardware, I was > wondering to what extent I

[flashrom] Re: [GSoC 2022] Restructure Shutdown Function

Hi Joursoir, Sorry for some delay, I wanted to respond more to the topic and finally found time :) > As I understood, they use the following approaches: > > 1. Register a callback by its own > > if (register_shutdown(serprog_shutdown, NULL)) > goto init_err_cleanup_exit; > > 2. Fill `struct

[flashrom] flashrom meeting notes 14.09.2023

# 14th September 2023, 6.00-7.00am UTC+0 Attendees: Stefan, Anastasia ## Decision summary * Renaming flashrom branch from "master" to "main" in the very near future. All patches in Gerrit will be converted with the script. ## Agenda * [Stefan] Renaming flashrom branch from "master" to "main"

[flashrom] Re: RDID Values Constantly Changing

Ryne, do you have logs by any chance? From two different times you ran flashrom and got different ids? You can attach or you can use paste.flashrom.org Thank you! On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 1:53 PM Ryne Everett wrote: > > Hello group, > > I'm attempting to flash a W25Q64FW with a CH341A. Despite

[flashrom] flashrom meeting notes 31.08.2023

# 31th August 2023, 6.00-7.00am UTC+0 Attendees: Stefan, Alex, Anastasia ## Decision summary * not much ## Agenda * Who is using libpayload, which state it is in, how to test it before release? * write a post to the mailing list * see how it goes. if no one responds, can we at least

[flashrom] Re: Report chip Atmel AT29C010A (write)

Sol, thank you for reporting. I created a patch to mark the chip as tested https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/78069 -- Anastasia. ___ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org

[flashrom] Re: Add support for new flash chip

Hello Sol, If you have time and energy, you can try and add the support yourself. Do you have the chip to test it? There are two relevant docs on the topic: Dev guide https://www.flashrom.org/dev_guide/development_guide.html and how to add chip

[flashrom] flashrom meeting notes 17.08.2023

# 17th August 2023, 6.00-7.00am UTC+0 Attendees: Joursoir, Stefan, Anastasia ## Decision summary * logo files will be copied from flashrom-media to flashrom repo (into doc/ to display on website) * enable Gerrit feature to not submit with unresolved comments ## Agenda * [aklm] is it okay to

[flashrom] dev feature enabled: unresolved comments block submit

Hello everyone, An announcement to everyone who is doing (or planning to do) any flashrom development. Since today, we are enabling the feature in Gerrit which blocks patch submit until all comments are resolved. You can see it in Gerrit if you open any patch, in the top-left section,

[flashrom] Re: ISSI Flash parts request to be added

Hi Johnny, Question marks mean that the operation in that column is untested for this chip, untested on hardware. Usually it happens when chip definition is added based on datasheets information, but without testing on hw. Later if someone runs operations on the chip successfully, the chip can be

[flashrom] Code Reviews guidelines discussion

Hello People, Few weeks ago at the flashrom meeting we had a discussion about code reviews and the situations that sometimes happen. We decided that it would be good to have some guidelines… and then we decided that I will start writing something. I have been thinking about it since then. I even

[flashrom] Flashrom Dev Meeting summary info

Hello People, I wanted to summarise the information on the time of Dev meeting. At some point there was an idea to alternate times, but then we discovered that we got really lucky and there is one time which everyone agrees on. That was an open question at the last meeting, to confirm the time

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy project and GSoC

Hi Aarya, Things are going well, we (Org Admins) have submitted all the "paperwork" for the projects and are now waiting for the official announcement! Nico is absolutely correct, announcement will be on May 20. We are waiting for it as much as you ;) -- Anastasia.

[flashrom] Re: Release preparations

Thanks so much for your thoughts everyone! I have important information for this thread. Next flashrom dev meeting which is this Thursday (in two days), specifically: 19th May 2022, 6:00 - 7:00 am UTC+0 will be discussing flashrom release! There are two parts in the topic: next release v1.3 and

[flashrom] Re: Gatekeeping, ACLs and Review Rules

Hello, I am also not a native English speaker, and need to always concentrate on the language. Sometimes I can't understand the person who has just spoken, in this case I am trying to clarify for example by asking "do I understand you correctly, do you mean ABCXYZ?". Also I remember a few times

[flashrom] Re: Flashrom Dev Meeting summary info

Hello, I wanted to add two more FAQs here. #5 Do I need to create an account anywhere? No, you can join without an account. Also you can view and comment on the meeting doc without an account. #6 How do I add a topic to the agenda? Add comments/suggestions on the meeting doc, and they will be

[flashrom] Welcome our 2022 students!

I am very proud because I have great news: we have 3 students joining the flashrom community to do projects! Aarya will be doing a GSoC project “Optimize Erase-Function Selection” with Thomas (Mentor), Simon (backup Mentor) and Nikolai. Chinmay will be doing a GSoC project “Refactor arguments

[flashrom] Decision making process

Hello People, The topic initially came up in the “Gatekeeping” thread. However it was suggested that it should be a separate thread, which makes sense so I am starting one. So, straight to the point: it looks like we have a decision making process emerging! (below). What do people think about

[flashrom] Re: Gatekeeping, ACLs and Review Rules

Hello Everyone, First of all let's summarize what has happened. Today is May 12. Two months ago (Mar 6) Nico started this thread on the mailing list: "Gatekeeping, ACLs and Review Rules". I recommend everyone [who is interested] re-read the opening email in this thread. It is well written,

[flashrom] Re: Request for clarification on "per-region file arguments" issue

Hello Daniel, Nico, I noticed this: > I think it would > be best to have somebody have a thorough look through all the changes. > Preferably somebody who didn't work on the patch because it's not easy > to spot one's own errors. Looking at the patch, it seems like almost everyone already worked

[flashrom] Re: Decision making process

Thanks for your thoughts! > one important point is the scope I guess, i.e. when to apply this > process. There are certainly things that we could call a "big > decision". The upcoming flashrom-reviewers group for Gerrit comes > to mind, for instance. However, for many smaller decisions the >

[flashrom] flashrom dev meeting notes 30.06.22

# 30th June 2022, 6:00 - 7:00 UTC+0 Attendees: Edward, Thomas, Stefan, Nikolai, Anastasia, Felix ## Decisions Summary * Raiden_debug_spi: Thomas will do a review of this programmer and add comments to the bug [https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/358](https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/358) * As

[flashrom] Re: Flash tested

Hello! Good to know the chip is working, If you can send logs that would be great! Thank you. On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 2:56 AM Tygert Baggins wrote: > > Hello, > I builded flashrom from source (2022-07-02) on Odroid C4 board (raspberry > clone) and tested flash chip FM25F01, everything was

[flashrom] Re: (no subject)

Hello Eduardo, This feature is super recent, so if you are using v1.2 then it's not there. You can, if you want, build flashrom from the latest code and you will see progress if you add `--progress` to the command line. But, a fair warning: building from the latest code means you get *everything

[flashrom] flashrom maintainers

Hello People, We just got a flashrom’s own MAINTAINERS file! I wanted to share the news with everyone. https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/blob/master/MAINTAINERS There is a script which will automatically add people as reviewers to the patch, if the patch is touching the files/area they are

[flashrom] Re: [GSoC 2022] Restructure Shutdown Function

g. > Eventually, are we not going to remove shutdown() func from the struct > spi_master and move it in struct programmer_entry? Will we keep shutdown() > in the struct spi_master and not in the struct programmer_entry for SPI > programmers? > > -- > Joursoir > > On Sat, 9 A

[flashrom] Re: Questions regarding Easy project and GSoC

Aarya, This is amazing news, I am super happy to get your project proposal! It is nice to have you with us :) We have long public holidays here (in AU), but I had a quick look and the proposal looks fine. Once the holidays are over, we, together with mentor(s), will go through the proposal

[flashrom] Re: Release preparations

I have great news: I created items for the release in our bugtracker! Here is a parent issue “Release v1.3” https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/353 and it has 23 subtasks. The subtasks are the items from the original starter email. Thank you so much Nico for going through the long history and

[flashrom] Re: Gatekeeping, ACLs and Review Rules

of the group (as it is suggested in the starter email) is a copy of “flashrom developers”, and then we can add people on the top. Thank you! Given the existing "flashrom developers" , maybe a new group can be called "flashrom reviewers"? On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 9:11 PM Anast

[flashrom] Re: Introduction to the community - Dhiren

Hello Dhiren, and welcome! I know you got lots of advice on the irc channel (which is great), I wanted to add a few more things to that. > I'm not a student anymore I cannot do it as part of GSOC, but I have done > open source contribution since 2 years That "student" requirement has been

[flashrom] Re: master state / potential release

Nico what was the goal why you started this thread? I thought for a moment, you have a *quick* question. So I answered. Now you seem to be unhappy to learn that we are closer to the release than 1/2 yr ago. You are saying "But I don't believe you", what was the point of asking then? --

[flashrom] Re: master state / potential release

The initial list of tickets for the release was created from Nico’s list of issues to check before the release. (see earlier thread about the release). Some of these are bugs, some others were in the form “what do we do with this?”. I understand that since a few months ago things could have

[flashrom] Re: Introduction to the community - Dhiren

Hi Dhiren, > the idea about bash auto completion sounds interesting to me and I would like > to work on it Awesome! You are in :) > Do you recommend to first play more with flashrom and then work on this > feature? Yes, I recommend to do few small things first. For example, this is one more

[flashrom] Re: Maybe move dev meeting from 22 Sept to 23 Sept?

Okay looks like people either fine or don't care (no one is against), so non-negative response. Let's move to 23 Sept then. I will modify the event, so that will be an email generated with "Updated invitation". Thanks everyone! -- Anastasia. ___

[flashrom] Maybe move dev meeting from 22 Sept to 23 Sept?

Hello, The next dev meeting is scheduled for 22 Sept, but it turns out there are some things happening: 1) This is a day right after OSFC which many people are attending. Joining a meeting early in the morning right after the last day of conference, from a hotel room, is not ideal. 2) All of a

[flashrom] Re: GSOC'23

Hello Prakhar, Thank you for your introduction! > I am new to the open source world and I will be trying for GSOC'23. For the program year 2022 (which is wrapping up already) we made a page with guidelines for contributors: https://www.flashrom.org/GSoC Most of the information is still

[flashrom] Re: master state / potential release

Hello, A quick answer first: We are closer to the release, and the state of the master is better than a half year ago. More details. In general, the progress is visible here https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/353 There is one issue that came up around May https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/390

[flashrom] Re: Question on adding some WP documentation

Hello Sergii, To the question whether the documentation is useful: IMO Yes, I 100% think it is useful. I did a quick read through the links. Where to put it, this is an interesting question. The advantage of Documentation/ directory in the repository is that it allows other people (anyone who

[flashrom] Re: meson build failure on 32bit [linux]

Hello Branden, First of all, thanks heaps for testing v1.3.0-rc1 and posting on the list! I looked at the logs, it seems you have this issue which was discovered some time earlier: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/407 The issue has been reported on the #flashrom irc channel, and potential

[flashrom] Re: meson build failure on 32bit [linux]

Branden, I made a patch with that: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/72038 If you could have a look and say whether this is what you have tested? If you have an account in Gerrit you can approve the patch, if not you can just reply here. Would you like to be added as Tested-By tag? That

[flashrom] Re: meson build failure on 32bit [linux]

Very good news, thank you for the update! Would you agree to send a patch to Gerrit? Have you used Gerrit before? I think you are the best person to send a patch, because you have the environment, and you did the actual testing. As a plan B I could send a patch and add you as Tested-By , and a

[flashrom] flashrom dev meeting notes 25.01.2023

# 25th January 2023, 21:00 - 22:00 UTC+0 Attendees: Thomas, Stefan, Prakhar, Nico, Edward, Anastasia ## Decision summary * Flashrom is not applying as a mentorship organisation for gsoc 2023 (no capacity to do all admin work, tight timelines). Independent contributors (outside of scope of gsoc)

[flashrom] Second release candidate v1.3.0-rc2 and countdown to release

Hello flashrom community, Second release candidate v1.3.0-rc2 (and likely the final one) has been tagged. It includes the fix for int-to-pointer-cast warnings for 32-bit Linux. Let's start the countdown until the end of January, and if no emergency happens, we will cut the release. I am copying

[flashrom] flashrom dev meeting notes 08.03.2023

# 8th March 2023, 21:00 - 22:00 UTC+0 Attendees: Thomas, Prakhar, Anastasia ## Decision summary * We will be using CreativeCommons license for documentation, CC-BY-4.0 * 26th April on this meeting will be a “development guidelines brainstorming session”. Everyone with ideas on how to improve

[flashrom] Re: logs for GD25Q256D on raspberry pi 1B

Adam, thank you! I looked at your logs, it seems like you are running not the latest version (1.2 in the logs vs 1.3 is the latest). In the latest version, this chip is marked as tested. But thank you anyway! :) -- Anastasia. ___ flashrom mailing list

[flashrom] Reminder: flashrom meeting time changes to 6.00 UTC+0 from April

Hello everyone, Just a reminder that from April and until September flashrom meetings move to Thursday 6.00-7.00am UTC+0 Next one is 13th April 6.00-7.00am UTC+0, and then every two weeks as usual. More details here https://www.flashrom.org/Contact#Dev_meeting -- Anastasia.

[flashrom] Re: Flash of [Winbond flash chip "W25Q128.V"] with Programmer [ch341a_spi]

Thank you! I just checked, the chip marked tested on head, so it should go to the next release. Good to have confirmation that it works! -- Anastasia. ___ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[flashrom] Release schedule

Good Day flashrom, We had an important decision about flashrom release schedule recently, and it went to the mailing list as a part of dev meeting notes (22.02.2023). However, the topic is big enough to have a dedicated thread on the mailing list. We decided to make releases twice a year: one in

[flashrom] Re: AM29LV040B writes work fine

I have created a patch for this chip: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/73429 Alex, do you have logs from that successful write that you did? And also, I still think it would be a good idea to create a gerrit account, to be able to send or review a patch one day! ;) -- Anastasia.

[flashrom] flashrom dev meeting notes 22.02.2023

# 22th February 2023, 21:00 - 22:00 UTC+0 Attendees: Thomas, Stefan, Prakhar, Anastasia ## Decision summary * New flashrom home page generated with sphinx coming soon. And then we eventually move relevant content from wiki and deprecate wiki. Details below in notes. * We will have two release

[flashrom] flashrom dev meeting notes 08.02.2023

Apologies for the delay, these are notes from two weeks ago. # 8th February 2023, 21:00 - 22:00 UTC+0 Attendees: Thomas, Stefan, Prakhar, Anastasia ## Decision summary * Few upgrades for Easy Projects page (TODO aklm) ## Agenda * [aklm] Easy Projects page needs some love. * How about

[flashrom] Re: manpage and documentation

Thomas this is fantastic, thank you so much! Sorry that it took me so long to respond. And that it can help with migrating and upgrading the homepage/website, make it even better! -- Anastasia. ___ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To

[flashrom] Re: AM29LV040B writes work fine

Alex, thank you so much for the report! I have a question for you: do you think you can send a patch to flashrom, to mark AM29LV040B as write-tested? That would be so great! -- Anastasia. ___ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To

[flashrom] Re: Unable to build flashrom from git repo without sphinx

I really like how we collectively debugged the issue and identified the root cause, even without Alex responding. This is so cool, thanks everyone! <3 Alex, Yes it's true that makefile will be deleted soon, probably later this year. It's a very good time to switch to meson, and please complain

[flashrom] flashrom dev meeting notes 22.03.2023

# 22th March 2023, 21:00 - 22:00 UTC+0 Attendees: Thomas, Stefan, Edward, Prakhar, Anastasia ## Decision summary * We need to update Signed-off-by guidelines , like Linux kernel did recently: strict real names not required to sign-off, can be a preferred known nickname (but not anonymous). DONE

[flashrom] Re: Unable to build flashrom from git repo without sphinx

Hi Alex, This is definitely not intended behaviour: sphinx is optional. If it is not present, flashrom can be built, just without docs. I didn't have sphinx locally for a while, and was building the sources without it. Only installed it very recently, because I started to add docs. Can you tell

[flashrom] flashrom release v1.3.0 is out

Good Day flashrom community, flashrom release v1.3.0 is out! Tag name: v1.3.0 Branch name: 1.3.x Tarball: download.flashrom.org/releases/flashrom-v1.3.0.tar.bz2 Signature: download.flashrom.org/releases/flashrom-v1.3.0.tar.bz2.asc Fingerprint: 6E6E F9A0 BA47 8006 E277 6E4C C037 BB41 3134 D111

  1   2   >