On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:41, Andy Ross wrote:
theoreticle wrote:
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am
Clipper, that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and
half loaded with fuel. The actual aircraft will sink it's
fuselage as far as 5 feet into the water,
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 10:20 +0100, Lee Elliott a crit :
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:41, Andy Ross wrote:
theoreticle wrote:
Let's say someone comes up with a model for the old Pan Am
Clipper, that wants to land fully loaded with passengers and
half loaded with fuel. The actual aircraft
Dave Culp wrote:
This is a poll. Does anyone really want the FDM to allow flying under the
terrain, or was that a misunderstanding by me?
No, this is not a misunderstanding. Probably your conclusion of we
need to avoid such a situation is different from mine. I would not
want to let aircraft
5. Re: timer help (Josh Babcock)
are there any references to use time delay in functions. i am trying to
delay speedbrake for 1.5 scnds everytime activated or deactivated in
larcsim . i tried to use sleep() functions in msvc71 but makes the
whole sim sleep:)
i am looking for example
On Donnerstag 09 Juni 2005 15:29, Gerard ROBIN wrote:
I have ( for my personal use ),
rebuild a Patch which can be applied to the last release (today 12 GMT)
of /FlightGear/source/src/FDM/JSBSim.
If Jon, Mathias, JSB development team, FG development team agree with,
and if anybody
On Saturday 11 June 2005 13:44, eagle monart wrote:
i am totaly lost. i ve tried different declarations of delay functions but
they starts infinite loops. i tihnk nasal expalined only for xml usage
but i didnt find a source to declare settimer() in a source code . I need
a
On Saturday 11 June 2005 14:15, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
settimer(foo(...), time)
where foo(...) is the function to call and time is the delay in seconds.
This will call foo(...) in time seconds from when settimer() is called.
Here is a function that repeats, or calls itself every 5
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On June 9, 2005 05:28 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
I'm curious if it is possible to 'simply' define the whole model as a
contact point and let the OpenGL subsystem detect terrain collision.
This would require some return channel from the OpenGL system back
to the
Hi All!
I would like to contribute to flightgear project... I'm interested in converting
italian scenery from MSFS (I already know that it is not possible to distribute
stuff that it isn't GPL compatible) and creating an MD-82 model for
flightgear...
1) Does someone is already working on that?
Lee Elliott wrote:
One problem with using YASim for sea planes is that the fuselage
mustn't contact the surface as this equates to a crash. While I
was experimenting with the SR45 I found that I had to omit the
lower fuselage deck to achieve this, which must then affect the
flying accuracy.
Gerard Robin wrote:
I could not use JSB (no rotor FDM) and with the use of Yasim it has
been very difficult to find the right way which make that model to
stand correctly on water with gear-up.
To answer that, JSBSim gives a better flexibility.
Both JSBSim and YASim use manually placed gear
eagle monart wrote:
i am totaly lost. i ve tried different declarations of delay
functions but they starts infinite loops. i tihnk nasal expalined
only for xml usage but i didnt find a source to declare settimer()
in a source code . I need a reference...
The documentation for the function is
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 08:39 -0700, Andy Ross a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
I could not use JSB (no rotor FDM) and with the use of Yasim it has
been very difficult to find the right way which make that model to
stand correctly on water with gear-up.
To answer that, JSBSim gives a better
The joystick subsystem does now work differently. Notable changes are:
(0) There's no need to list all joystick config files in
$FG_ROOT/Input/Joysticks.
They are loaded automatically.
(1) /input/joysticks/ does only contain nodes for active joysticks --
that's only one single js[0] in
Gerard Robin wrote:
with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
problems .
I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim have all but
identical* gear systems. Can you please post the YASim
* Andy Ross -- Saturday 11 June 2005 17:35:
FWIW, adding special behavior for contact points when they touch water
(relaxed crash distance and spring constant, I guess) wouldn't be
hard, provided the hard part is done: telling the FDM when the
intersection point is with water.
The hard part
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 11 June 2005 18:14:
* Andy Ross -- Saturday 11 June 2005 17:35:
wouldn't be hard, provided the hard part is done: telling the FDM when the
intersection point is with water.
The hard part *is* done already. See in groundcache.cxx:
[...]
type and frictionFactor!
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Andy Ross -- Saturday 11 June 2005 17:35:
FWIW, adding special behavior for contact points when they touch water
(relaxed crash distance and spring constant, I guess) wouldn't be
hard, provided the hard part is done: telling the FDM when the
intersection point is with
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Umm ... I take the frictionFactor back. That's just a placeholder for now
and always returns 1.0. But the type should work. :-)
(rolling)-friction and bumpiness could be read from materials.xml in the
future.
Erik
___
Andy wrote:
whereas YASim allows different gear object
to retract independently.
!!!
... now there's a thought. Hmmm. I feel a feature request coming for JSBSim. :-)
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Message transfr
De: Gerard Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rpondre : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Re: [Jsbsim-devel] crash handling options for JSBSim in
FlightGear
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:39:41 +0200
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 14:59 -0500, Dave Culp a crit :
It seems
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 09:24 -0700, Andy Ross a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About
retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big
problems .
I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim have all
On Saturday 11 Jun 2005 16:35, Andy Ross wrote:
Lee Elliott wrote:
One problem with using YASim for sea planes is that the
fuselage mustn't contact the surface as this equates to a
crash. While I was experimenting with the SR45 I found that
I had to omit the lower fuselage deck to
Message transfr
De: Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rpondre : FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Objet: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Jsbsim-devel] crash
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 19:53:19 + (UTC)
eagle monart wrote
And, as always, posting the code you are having trouble with is much
more useful than simply announcing that different versions start
infinite loops. :)
Andy
i wrote different functions here is few examples. by the way i am writing
these to the larcsim c172aero
On Saturday 11 Jun 2005 21:28, Gerard Robin wrote:
Sorry ,I probably, missed something but i have no access to CVS respective
changelog entry,
You can subscribe to the flightgear-cvslogs mailing list or check the archive
here;
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-cvslogs/
Sorry ,I probably, missed something but i have no access to CVS respective
changelog entry,
You can subscribe to the flightgear-cvslogs mailing list or check the archive
here;
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-cvslogs/
This one may interest you :
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 21:40 +0100, AJ MacLeod (email lists) a crit :
On Saturday 11 Jun 2005 21:28, Gerard Robin wrote:
Sorry ,I probably, missed something but i have no access to CVS respective
changelog entry,
You can subscribe to the flightgear-cvslogs mailing list or check the
Message transfr
De: Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
De: Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This was explained in the CVS respective changelog entry,
Martin.
Sorry ,I probably, missed something but i have no access to CVS respective
changelog entry,
I
On June 11, 2005 06:07 pm, Oliver C. wrote:
I agree with the terrain.
But i think that airplanes need to be able to sink after they crash. :)
So the best way would be to make the terrain and watersurfaces independent
from each other.
This would also have some positive side effects because it
Gerard Robin wrote:
Sorry ,I probably, missed something but i have no access to CVS
respective changelog entry,
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-cvslogs/
Look at the recent changes made by Erik,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who
On June 11, 2005 03:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All!
I would like to contribute to flightgear project... I'm interested in
converting italian scenery from MSFS (I already know that it is not
possible to distribute stuff that it isn't GPL compatible) and creating an
MD-82 model for
hi all;
i am looking for detailed info and measurements of t-38 . some guys told mei can even find accurate scalar tables in roskam books series. i am planning to buy one from amazon but dont know which one contains t-38 datas. anyone knows??
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
I like that idea. It would be nice to fly along the coast of a tropical
island, look down and be able to see the white sand under the water...
I think we could already get this by exploring the shallow water
attribute in the VMAP data well, I could be wrong,
Le samedi 11 juin 2005 22:07 +, Martin Spott a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
Sorry ,I probably, missed something but i have no access to CVS
respective changelog entry,
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-cvslogs/
Look at the recent changes made by Erik,
eagle monart wrote:
i am tryng to add a delay in seconds before activation/
deactivation of cockpit functions. my aim is to declare
specific drag according to time within component cycle time. i
am trying to add an example decleration for that purposebut
function goes
36 matches
Mail list logo
