> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:33:50 + (UTC)
> From: Martin Spott
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT commit 31819df8: Alouette II - New
> FDM by
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>
> Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
>> I hate to say it, but the the new fdm is
Ron beat me to it, but I was going to suggest the same thing ... create an
alouette2-easy-set.xml ... or aloutte2-beginner-set.xml or something along
those lines. Then we can have both FDM's available and the end user can
choose which one they want. A git commit war would be no fun.
On Wed, May
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 18:39:50 Heiko Schulz wrote:
> I would like to have the old fdm back, maybe it is possible to have another
> version with the easy-to-fly-fdm beside the original one.
>
> Any opinions about, something I missed?
>
> Heiko
Helijah's workflow should make it dead simple to cr
Hello all,
> Does anyone know, if JM-26, the author of the new fdm, is
> reading the
> devel list or has an email address for me to contact him
> directly?
>
> Regards
> Maik
>
I found the author on another french FlightGear Forum.
Here you go:
http://equipe-flightgear.forumactif.com/t504-l-a
If you wanted to broadest platform support, I'd suggest looking at
WebGL instead, even though it's bleeding edge. As Android and iOS are so
different from each other (Programming language, API etc), the amount of
effort to build something specific for one platform would exhaust you
from building
I currently am in possession of a ARM Cortex-A8 development board,
complete with graphics processor(PowerVR SGX) and Android support. If
you need any hardware to test software on, I'll be willing to help.
It has a screen, though pretty low res(480x272), and the LCD interface
got a small issue, but
How hard would it be to change the background colour based on the camera
altitude? Even a linear gradient between two set points would work, I think.
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 22:41:54 +0200
> From: bre...@gmail.com
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] T
"J. Holden" wrote:
> http://www.stattosoftware.com/flightgear/golfcourse.png
> AND
> http://www.stattosoftware.com/flightgear/golfcourse_winter.png
>
> If someone could commit these to git and update materials.xml, well, I'd be
> very happy.
I'm planning to commit these textures together with t
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 02:50:02 PM Claus Christmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to combine a personal project of mine with FlightGear. In
> order to do that, I am writing some C++ code to interact with Matlab (to
> be precise, with the Matlab engine). However, I run into trouble when
> tryin
I did actually speak with Brisa this afternoon, and he will probably merge the
changes tomorrow or in the next few days. I only posted this version to the ML
because the changes to FGCOM compilation are a couple of weeks old and I
thought Francesco had already requested them to be included into
On 18.05.2011 22:45, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:19 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Csaba, that's already close! I looked at the commit logs but
>> didn't find any obvious culprit. A good next test would be r12312 -
>
> ... which is broken.
> Turns out 12303 is the cause for
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:19 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
>
> Thanks Csaba, that's already close! I looked at the commit logs but
> didn't find any obvious culprit. A good next test would be r12312 -
... which is broken.
Turns out 12303 is the cause for the constant sunshine ;)
Specifically, the GLSL ve
Ok, the black sky issue was indeed caused by changing the clear color.
The effect is really ugly - black sky when flying through clouds or
fog. Also black sky when flying above a cloud layer. And it's not
restricted to 2D clouds alone.
That's the relevant commit:
http://www.gitorious.org/fg/flight
--
From: "Martin Spott"
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8:15 PM
Newsgroups: list.flightgear-devel
To:
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Testing OSG-trunk / bug issue #268
> ThorstenB wrote:
>
>> Thanks Curt, that sounds very much like a possible reaso
Hi,
Am 18.05.2011 21:09 schrieb Heiko Schulz:
>
>> If the drawbacks introduced by the new
>> FDM are really that
>> obvious and serious as you've stated here, I'd say you/we
>> should take a
>> revert of the latter change into account.
> At least the author of the first and in my eyes much more rea
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 03:12:24 PM Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Claus Christmann wrote:
> > Have you looked at the "ground control station" for the Parrot AR Drone?
> > http://youtu.be/wtlp7jwvkd4
>
> The Parrot AR drone is a cool product, but that's a proprietary sy
ThorstenB wrote:
> Thanks Curt, that sounds very much like a possible reason. Was that a
> change to fg/sg or fgdata? Anyone remembers the exact commit?
As far as I remember, it's related to "Lauri Peltonen" and "sky dome",
it's implementing a shader (among other stuff) and was indeed meant to
b
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Claus Christmann wrote:
> Have you looked at the "ground control station" for the Parrot AR Drone?
> http://youtu.be/wtlp7jwvkd4
>
The Parrot AR drone is a cool product, but that's a proprietary system,
right? In our case we would have significantly different de
>
> In general I'd recommend first to discuss the item with the
> author of
> the change.
In general it is my prefered way as well. With any author just but not this one
for some reasons.
> If the drawbacks introduced by the new
> FDM are really that
> obvious and serious as you've stated he
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 02:36:25 PM Curtis Olson wrote:
> This is a bit off topic, but I was wondering if we have any developers here
> who might be interested in talking about a specific android (or ipad)
> project.
>
> As many of you may know, I am involved with a small company that is
> deve
On 18.05.2011 20:39, Curtis Olson wrote:
> I seem to recall we changed the clear color to black recently. It may
> be that with 2d clouds we were depending on the clear color matching the
> fog color for correct rendering? I'm not sure what the motivation for
> changing the clear color was, but I
On 18.05.2011 01:08, TDO_Brandano - wrote:
> I have applied a couple of small modifications to the script to fix
> FGCOM and ATLAS compilation with the current repository versions of
> both. The changes are relatively small, just a couple of sed rule
> changes for the FGCOM makefile and a renamed f
Hi,
I am trying to combine a personal project of mine with FlightGear. In order
to do that, I am writing some C++ code to interact with Matlab (to be precise,
with the Matlab engine). However, I run into trouble when trying to
compile/link my stuff in FG - hence my question on how to do it "pr
I seem to recall we changed the clear color to black recently. It may be
that with 2d clouds we were depending on the clear color matching the fog
color for correct rendering? I'm not sure what the motivation for changing
the clear color was, but I'm guessing it was related to the sky dome or
dra
This is a bit off topic, but I was wondering if we have any developers here
who might be interested in talking about a specific android (or ipad)
project.
As many of you may know, I am involved with a small company that is
developing a UAS (UAV) and autopilot. We have a PC based ground station
al
On 18.05.2011 18:16, Alan Teeder wrote:
> As requested I have today tested with VC2010 and all the pre-compiled
> versions of OSG that I have available.
>
> These are OSG 2,8.4 and OSG trunk (at present OSG 2.9.12) from
> http://openscenegraph.alphapixel.com/osg/downloads/free-openscenegraph-binary
On 18.05.2011 19:29, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:45 AM, ThorstenB wrote:
>> working/non-working OSG revision in between 11900 and 12419, you're
>> welcome to let us know. Also, maybe someone has an extremely powerful
>> machine and could help with testing different OSG revision
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:45 AM, ThorstenB wrote:
> working/non-working OSG revision in between 11900 and 12419, you're
> welcome to let us know. Also, maybe someone has an extremely powerful
> machine and could help with testing different OSG revisions.
My machine is not extremely powerful, but
As requested I have today tested with VC2010 and all the pre-compiled
versions of OSG that I have available.
These are OSG 2,8.4 and OSG trunk (at present OSG 2.9.12) from
http://openscenegraph.alphapixel.com/osg/downloads/free-openscenegraph-binary-downloads
and and OSG 2.9.10 from
ftp://ft
> From: "Torsten Dreyer"
>
> Loosing the ability to control the atmosphere within FlightGear would be
> a massive loss of functionality. We currently control atmosphere in
> several different ways like real weather based on METAR. The "local
> weather" project has just started to create a compl
If you want to do that, count me in. All you have to do is explain me a bit
what I have to do.
I have been looking at the source code, but I don´t know where the branches
to merge are.
Thanks for the information.
See you,
Marcel Fernández
2011/5/17 Martin Spott
> Marcel Fernan
Am 18.05.2011 14:32, schrieb Ron Jensen:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:35:59 Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>>> What is the requirement from the FlightGear side for an atmosphere
>>> model?
>>> I'd like to remove the capability to drive the JSBSim standard
>>> atmosphere
>>> model from FlightGear, but first I'
> Ok, thanks. We'll probably have to narrow it down to the exact OSG
> commit to see what changed there. If anyone else has a
> working/non-working OSG revision in between 11900 and 12419, you're
> welcome to let us know. Also, maybe someone has an extremely powerful
> machine and could help with
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:35:59 Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > What is the requirement from the FlightGear side for an atmosphere
> > model?
> > I'd like to remove the capability to drive the JSBSim standard
> > atmosphere
> > model from FlightGear, but first I'd like to get a clear picture of how
> > Fl
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> I hate to say it, but the the new fdm is completly wrong and doesn't
> apply to the real one in any way.
In general I'd recommend first to discuss the item with the author of
the change. If the drawbacks introduced by the new FDM are really that
obvious and serious as you'v
Hello,
I just noticed that the Alouette II fdm has been replaced by a new fdm, which
was originally made by Maik Justus.
That's sad.
As I know Maik Justus always uses a lot of real datas for the fdm's, based on
pilot reports and real manuals as long it can be get free in the web.
I hate to s
That's 519 possible culprits. It will take 10 compiles to find the exact
revision by successive approximations.
> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 08:45:11 +0200
> From: bre...@gmail.com
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Testing OSG-trunk / bug issue #268
>
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
