On mar 8 janvier 2008, Tim Moore wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> | Hello,
> |
> | I was afaik, and i just built the last FG-OSG , unfortunately i get a
> | crash during loading:
> | fgfs --aircraft=c172p
> | Error: Not able to create requested visual.
> | Erreur de segme
Hello,
I was afaik, and i just built the last FG-OSG , unfortunately i get a crash
during loading:
fgfs --aircraft=c172p
Error: Not able to create requested visual.
Erreur de segmentation
What the matter ?
I do use the last OSG 2.2 stable.
Happy new year.
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-ora
On mer 26 décembre 2007, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> Hi all...
> Just had another thought ...
> Maybe a simpler idea would be to have the sim/view/config/field-of-view
> property added to the autosave function ? This way it could be set per
> aircraft
> but that still means editing the properties in th
On mer 26 décembre 2007, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:38:22 +0100
>
> Maik Justus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Syd,
> >
> > what's about an algorithm, which checks the ratio of the screen and sets
> > fow to 55 for 4:3 screens and 70 for 16:9 screens? (55 / 70 = (4/3) /
> > (16/9
On mer 26 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
> And IIRC Boeing engine pylons are designed to detach if they are subject to
> rearward forces.
>
> I'm quite happy with the appearance of a water "landing" for the Seahawk:
> it sinks nicely by about the right amount. Of course we haven't modelled
On mer 26 décembre 2007, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> Hi everyone , and merry christmas...
> I'm busy playing with my new 1440x900 flat - panel monitor ...wow what a
> difference in FG ! Which gave me an idea maybe others would appreciate
> too
> Before this , a default field 0f view of 55 was about righ
On mar 25 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> On mar 25 décembre 2007, GWMobile wrote:
> > The original post quoted below exemplifies why I beleive it is a mistake
> > to ever have crash detection for water in a flight sim however let me
> > lay it out simply.
> >
>
On mar 25 décembre 2007, GWMobile wrote:
> The original post quoted below exemplifies why I beleive it is a mistake
> to ever have crash detection for water in a flight sim however let me
> lay it out simply.
>
> 1. Anyone who lands on water in a flight sim knows they are doing it. It
> is highly l
Hello,
I, again come back to the "init with .set xml" feature.
I can't get any int defined with the on the .set.xml files, i told
that problem with the helicopter
0
1
which was not taken in account, i get throttle=0 after
On lun 24 décembre 2007, LeeE wrote:
> On Monday 24 December 2007 12:08, gerard robin wrote:
> > On lun 24 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
> > > Maik Justus wrote:
> > > > Hi Gerard,
> > > >
> > > > gerard robin schrieb am 24.12.2007 01:14:
>
On lun 24 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
> Maik Justus wrote:
> > Hi Gerard,
> >
> > gerard robin schrieb am 24.12.2007 01:14:
> >> BTW: i could not use the c172 because mine makes difference between
> >> water and solid
> >>
> >> Cheers
&
On dim 23 décembre 2007, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just launched a current cvs build with
> ./fgfs --aircraft=c172p --start-date-sys=2007:06:21:12:00:00 --lat=89.0
> --lon=10 As expected, the cessna sat on the water since there is no scenery
> installed. After takeoff, when flying a few miles
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > It is the best way, to have in property the coordinates of the points
> > which are defined in the AI model (may be, the precision would a
> > problem)
>
> The propert
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Csaba Halász -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > Well, the FGAICarrier code already finds catapult and wire nodes,
> > maybe we can just add them to the property tree there?
>
> But it does so as an OSG node visitor with intersection testing
> done b
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > The problem here is we don't have a generic solution this must
> > be calculated for each carrier or any AI object according to the
> > .xml file definition , one calculati
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007 7:46 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year)
> >
> > I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position
Hello,
Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year)
I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the position
of the aircraft and the position of a specific point on an AI object in my
case the catapult and the wires on the carrier.
Is their any
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > To me, these property are not declared twice, [...]
>
> The problem isn't that they are "declared" twice, but that there
> are two code parts that try to tie it, or
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> > Failed to tie property /controls/gear/float-down to a pointer
>
> The error message is generated in JBSim/input_ouput/FGPropertyManager.cpp
> when SGPropertyNode::tie returned false.
Hello,
I wonder if there was not any modification about the sequence loading of
JSBsim during FlightGear start up.
With FlightGear V-1.0.0 (thanks to everybody who contribute to that great
release) , and with FG_osg, i get some warning message regarding JSBsim only:
Failed to tie property .
On mer 19 décembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> On 19/12/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On mer 19 décembre 2007, Pavel T wrote:
> > > Hello Flightgear Developer(s),
> > > I was thinking of this idea and I thought you might like it.
> >
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Pavel T wrote:
> Hello Flightgear Developer(s),
> I was thinking of this idea and I thought you might like it.
> You might have guessed already by the subject of the e-mail. I was thinking
> of maybe someone could make different versions of trees and make someking
> of a to
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Wednesday 19 December 2007:
> > I don't agree, :)
> >
> > in reality the Osprey lands on Carrier, and is 'driven' to the hangar
> > (elevator).
>
> OK, so far you *agree* ...
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
> Hi Gerard,
>
> gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 15:51:
> > On mer 19 décembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
> >> Hi Gerard,
> >>
> >> gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 14:44:
> >>> Here Osprey w
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Detlef Faber wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 17:17 +0100 schrieb gerard robin:
> > Hello, carrier users
> >
> > Working with FG official V-1.0.0 data and source, i cannot get the
> > carrier elevators to work :(
> > Does somebody e
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> Much better now. :-)
>
> But the v22 on the elevator is cheating (and thus violating
> my personal diktator policies). You can't realistically land
> it there, and there's no way to move a v22 to the elevator
> once landed. Cheated "screenshots" hav
Hello, carrier users
Working with FG official V-1.0.0 data and source, i cannot get the carrier
elevators to work :(
Does somebody else has checked it
Regards
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
-
SF.Net em
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
> Hi Gerard,
>
> gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 14:44:
> > Here Osprey with rotors all folded up, on elevator
> >
> > http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Osprey_on_carrier.jpg
> >
> > I only got huge difficulti
On mer 19 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
>
> Seems like someone compressed a jpeg compressed image instead of basing
> them all on a looseless original. The result is that the artifacts add up
> and the images look bad. For best result all the smaller images should be
> generated from a looseless
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Chris Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:33:26 +0100
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
>
> (snip good suggestions about various pictures in the gallery)
>
> The one big suggestion I'd make is to drop the current caption for
> each photo, which appears to just be the base filen
On mar 18 décembre 2007, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
>
SNIP
> 5. Can someone send an image of the osprey with it's rotors all folded up?
>
SNIP
>
> Thanks,
>
> Curt.
Here Osprey with rotors all folded up, on elevator
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Osprey_on_carrier.jpg
I only got huge difficulties
On mer 19 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> On mer 19 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
> > Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the
> > background seems partly below deck?
>
> Hello, Arvid
> If you want i can UP the elevator. :)
>
> C
On mer 19 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
> Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the background
> seems partly below deck?
>
>
Hello, Arvid
If you want i can UP the elevator. :)
Cheers
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
--
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Chris Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:33:52 +0100
>
> AnMaster wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the
> > background seems partly below deck?
>
> It's on an elevator, if
On mar 18 décembre 2007, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Here is a prototype for the v1.0 Gallery:
>
> http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/tmp/v1.0/
>
> I've taken the best of the pictures that were submitted on the mailing list
> and organized and arranged them.
>
> Here are a few things that jump out at
Hello, helicopter lover
I just have added on the S-51 an animation of a rescue operation, this is the
first step which must be followed by others more accurate (i hope).
That animation is a separate part which is included in a specific
directory "Rescue" (here Aircraft/S-51-Dragonfly/Mod
On lun 17 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
In order to give an easy access to the snapshots (if useful) which could be
used for FG 1.0, i have built a summary (sorry no thumbnail, missing space)
Here the link
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux
The last addition is the
http://pagesperso
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkeApfVUnVk
Great movie and great model , it is a a pleasure to fly it
Thanks
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
-
SF.Net email is sp
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> gerard robin schrieb:
> > You are right, the Torsten's Dragonfly banner-trick is a very good
> > example. I must take time to look at it. Good idea :)
> >
> > I only need more free time.
> >
> >
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Detlef Faber wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 14.12.2007, 13:43 +0100 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
> > For a new release, especially one with version number 1.0, we
> > should provide some new screenshots for the website.
>
> [...]
>
> I've got some too, hope I'm not too late.
>
> http:
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> gerard robin schrieb:
> > On lun 17 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> >>> Hi Gérard,
> >>>
> >>> do I understand this right that you managed (with
> >>> some Nasal code?) that
> >
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > Hi Gérard,
> >
> > do I understand this right that you managed (with
> > some Nasal code?) that
> > one can "catch" an object (ie the poor pilot) with
> > the winch tow and get
> > it (him) out of the water to the carrier?
> >
> > This would be spect
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> gerard robin schrieb:
> > On lun 17 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> >>> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Rescue_1.jpg
> >>
> >> Is the winch a trick? Never noticed...
> >>
> >> Great pi
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> --- gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> > > On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Here a lot of "photo
On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
>
>
> Here a lot of "photos" about Blackbird-A with "aar" and Blackbird-B
> with "chute".
>
> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_1.jpg
>
On dim 16 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > Here, with FG 1.0 both, Bravo and Blackbird are
> > right,
> > I get mainly problems with OSG.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gérard
> > http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
>
> FGFS 12/13/2007 windows precompiled
>
May be something differen
omly with other aircraft too.
> > Im recompiling the PLIB version to test again ,it's
> > probably my fault.
> > Just wondering if anyone else is having this problem
> > .
> > Cheers
> >
> > --
> > Syd&Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
Here a lot of "photos" about Blackbird-A with "aar" and Blackbird-B
with "chute".
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_1.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_2.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.f
On sam 15 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
> Very nice!
> Have you commited the nicer parachutes to cvs? I would like to try some
> screenshots with them too. :) Also where is that screenshot taken? What is
> the local airport?
>
> Regards,
>
> Arvid Norlander
>
Hello Arvid,
Sorry, for the delayed a
On sam 15 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> On sam 15 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > ..and a pity that the parachutes are nor really
> > round...
> >
> > but this are the shots are needed!
> >
> > Regards
> > HHS
> > --- AJ MacLeod <
On sam 15 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> ..and a pity that the parachutes are nor really
> round...
>
> but this are the shots are needed!
>
> Regards
> HHS
> --- AJ MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> schrieb:
> > On Saturday 15 December 2007 14:34
On sam 15 décembre 2007, AJ MacLeod wrote:
This could give an idea for an other snapshot.
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Noratlas-Para.jpg
That one has a wrong definition ( missing aliasing )
Regards
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
On sam 15 décembre 2007, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Here is a nice shot over chicago...
> No antialiasing, sorry...
> http://www.t3r.de/fg/c172chicago.jpg
>
> Torsten
>
So, with FG, we can notice some "little" improvements ( on Amiga, the
pictures are better) :):) :)
Regards
--
Gérard
On ven 14 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> gerard robin
>
> > Sent: 14 December 2007 15:31
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] screenshots (and "snapshots")
> >
> > On ven 14 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ
On ven 14 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> On ven 14 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > For a new release, especially one with version number 1.0, we
> > should provide some new screenshots for the website. Normally,
> > Curt would ask for that, but as he is/wa
On ven 14 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> For a new release, especially one with version number 1.0, we
> should provide some new screenshots for the website. Normally,
> Curt would ask for that, but as he is/was away for a few days,
> I start with this reminder. Screenshots should ...
>
SNI
On jeu 13 décembre 2007, AJ MacLeod wrote:
> On Thursday 13 December 2007 19:52:18 Durk Talsma wrote:
> > In light of some recently uncovered problems related to the bleriot, how
> > about making a last minute decision to replace it with the sopwith camel?
> > I just checked the aircraft, and can c
On mer 12 décembre 2007, Stewart Andreason wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> or,
> I can wonder, "How does that aircraft look and fly?", and then get a
> segfault with gdb backtrace...
>
> Conditions to reproduce: turn on Aircraft shadow, bump clouds, and 3d
> clouds
On mer 12 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Wednesday 12 December 2007:
> > And, what, about the Bleriot FDM done by David and Lee ?
>
> Oh, I don't want to diktate about this either. But I think with
> the current FDM it would put us into a glasshouse
On mer 12 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Saturday 08 December 2007:
> > Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following
> > list of aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
>
> BTW: one of these lacks a texture file. I just don't want to
> diktate that it
On mar 11 décembre 2007, LeeE wrote:
>
>
> I couldn't resist having a quick look at it:)
>
> I've attached a config for you to have a look at (tarred & gzip'd)
>
> I took your revised config and changed:
>
> approach aoa - now set to 3 deg - 15 deg value seemed much too high
> and just wouldn't ha
Hello,
About helicopter, i told that i will deliver one of my old models Lynx-WG13,
however i had not any snapshot to show you, after some cleaning and update,
here the rough result.
I will commit it by the end of that week.
Later on, It will want:
=>A good FDM ( fortunately Maik is there :
On mar 11 décembre 2007, dave perry wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
SNIP
> >>
> >> The bleriot is very nice, much nicer than the wright. But its FDM
> >> is a bit ... ummm ... well, the engine is quite powerful and the
> >> aircraft allows some aerobat
On mar 11 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Tuesday 11 December 2007:
> > [...] with YASim, i try to give an init value within the
> > Aircraft-set.xml file
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
On mar 11 décembre 2007, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Quoting gerard robin :
> >
> > I am coming back on something which could be a bug (may be i am wrong).
> >
> > As said previously, with YASim, i try to give an init value within th
On mar 11 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Tuesday 11 December 2007:
> > As it looks right now, either tonight, or Thursday evening will
> > be my two windows of opportunity this week.
>
> I would rather go for Thursday, then. It's only known for a short
> time which aircraft
On mar 11 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
> On mar 11 décembre 2007, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> > I think I finally found out why the b1900d is still running at startup...
> > The condition lever is set to 1 in the TurbineEngine.cpp file , so it
> > appears to override anyt
On mar 11 décembre 2007, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> I think I finally found out why the b1900d is still running at startup...
> The condition lever is set to 1 in the TurbineEngine.cpp file , so it
> appears to override anything in the set file. Ive forced it to 0 in the
> system.nas file during fdm initia
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Saturday 08 December 2007:
> > Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following list of
> > aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
>
> Looks good. Not trying to say anything particular -- just FYI:
>
> 20M 78
On dim 9 décembre 2007, Tim Moore wrote:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 09 December 2007:
> >> glut in fg/plib or fg/osg?
> >
> > Disregard. I see from the diff that it's fg/osg. In that
> > case the patch shouldn't be applied. Tim, can you check if
> > your last change to t
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Ralf Gerlich wrote:
> Hi Gerard!
>
> gerard robin wrote:
> > Thanks , but NO
> > Catalina and Blackbird are on only under construction.
> > There is a lot of stuff to do , cockpit and FDM (mainly Blackbird which
> > is wrong),
> &g
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following list of
> aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
>
> 787
> A-10
> bf109
> bo105
> c172
> c172p
> SenecaII
> Beaver
> B1900d
> Lightning
> j3cub
> seahawk
> p51d
> pa28-161
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following list of
> aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
>
> 787
> A-10
> bf109
> bo105
> c172
> c172p
> SenecaII
> Beaver
> B1900d
> Lightning
> j3cub
> seahawk
> p51d
> pa28-161
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 08 December 2007:
> > it was time to add some generic properties for "internal communication".
>
> It's probably also time to remind people again of the possibility to
> add Nasal code to model (animation) XML files. This
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> AnMaster
>
> > Sent: 08 December 2007 11:55
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiplayer generic properties
> >
SNIP
> >
> > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > After Maik has clued me up about multiplayer propertie
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Gerard robin wrote
>
> > Sent: 07 December 2007 15:44
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft Downloading and Quality
> >
> > On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Goorg, and Melchir,
>
> Thanks for your report and opinion.
>
> On Dec 8, 2007, at 1:09 AM, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
> > Hi Tat,
> > tested this on OpenSUSE 10.2 86_64 with FG 9.11 Prerelease
> > S76 Helicopter
> >
> >> 1. DList stack overflow
>
> (
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Jon Stockill wrote:
> I've got a Chipmunk T-10 planned when the grob g115 is more complete -
> was the standard RAF trainer a long time ago, and is still in service
> for pilots training to fly with the BBMF - would that be suitable?
>
> Jon
>
that one ? http://www.spyflig
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Friday 07 December 2007:
> > http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/StampeSV4.jpg
>
> Wow, that's a nice one!
>
> > Unfortunately it will not be available before FG stable will
> > be released :(
>
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> --- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 07 December 2007:
> > > - avoiding really difficult to fly aircraft in the default aircraft
> > >collection doesn't make fgfs a toy, and
> >
> > Oh, and to take some pressure from the bf10
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > Yes we must not talk about artistic competences
> > (here the "msfs" models are
> > better :( ), only to answer the question: does the
> > model simulate the real
> > one ?which degree of simulation ?
>
> Right I think- eye candies are only one
On ven 7 décembre 2007, AJ MacLeod wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007 14:40:34 gerard robin wrote:
> > Making the 3D model "shape" is the easiest (5% of the work, more or less
> > 24 hours of work, but very complicated shape)
> > There is a lot of stuff to do:
&
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Hans Fugal wrote:
> The aircraft discussion has been interesting. One stumbling block I've
> come across when deciding which aircraft to download before is the
> quality guessing game. The web site lists the author's assessment, but
> I've found that to be less useful than i
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Laurence Vanek -- Friday 07 December 2007:
> > Although I like realistic flight my ILS approaches we very unstable with
> > the turb values given in the Preferences.xml file [...]
>
> But, but ... some have just told us that we shouldn't make it too
On jeu 6 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> A screenshot here:
> http://www.hoerbird.net/boeing737-300.3dcockpit1.jpg
>
> I have still trouble with perfomance, but I have a
> too old pc anyway ...
>
> That's why the developement is very slow and now cause
> of looking for a new job I w
Heiko Schulz schreef:
> Hi,
>
> Still working on the 3D-cockpit but a first release I
> can give this week!
>
> HHS
Screenshots? Will that be an actual -300 cockpit (with EFIS and separate
engine gauges) instead of the current 'NG-like' cockpit gauges?
I do think there aren't enough decent airlin
On jeu 6 décembre 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> --- gerard robin wrote:
> > Nobody (but me) has talked about the Concorde which is highly
> > elaborated why ?
>
> Probably because few people on the -dev list take the time to fully get to
> grips with it.
>
-> Concorde ()
>
> Even though the T38 is probably a category of its own, my general
> impression is that the broader class this aircraft belongs to (let's say:
> small high-powered jet powered and highy manouvreable) is a bit
> overrepresented (with the A10,
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
> There has been some discussion of the F-16 working badly. I took another
> look at it over lunch. I think I have found one bug (which is not to
> say, the "only" bug). There are several integrators used in the control
> laws. These should have wind-up
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 14:50 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
> > On mar 4 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
> > > I haven't made much time lately for this project... If someone with
> > > write access would like to put this
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
> > I wonder if it is a platform-specific issue?
>
> Extremely unlikely.
>
> But this could play a role: my js has the centering spring
> deactivated. So, when I have the f16 parked, this is often
> with
On mar 4 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
>
> I haven't made much time lately for this project... If someone with
> write access would like to put this aircraft into CVS, they have my
> permission. I'm been meaning to have it put in...
>
> Ron Jensen
>
>
>
Because i love it (and i have cvs acces
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
> > On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
> > > as working ones, for "balancing reasons
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
> > Don't we have to take care, and to keep a balance like it was before ?
>
> You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
> as working ones, for "ba
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
> > I believe recent enhancements and fixes in JSBSim may have
> > fixed the F-16, but I'm not sure.
>
> Well, not in FlightGear's CVS, though it may have improved
> a bit. BTW: I reported that problem a
On mar 4 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Tuesday 04 December 2007:
> > data/Aircraft/737-300 \
>
> Yes, I'd swap that with the 787. A flat panel that disappears
> when you look left/right is hard to bear. (Though I miss a VOR
> display on the 787. Need to sea
Hello,
To follow the previous topic about some helicopters which are in my "private"
hangar , Alouette III, Lynx, and Puma,
Alouette III is now available on cvs,
That model will need:
a "good" FDM, the Maik know how will be very useful :)
a cockpit witht instruments and animations ,
On jeu 2 août 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
> Been working on the stork, so I updated my safety copy.
>
> - Added a rattling chain sound to the flap movement.
> - Started detailing nose area
>
> There's some quicky screen caps here, too:
> http://www.jentronics.com/fgfs/storch-001.jpg
> http://www.jentro
On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Monday 03 December 2007:
> > Yes SG_WARN, would be the best, that message isn't it for
> > FG developer , who could want a help, to keep their models compatible ?
>
> Err ... but if I see that right, there
On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Monday 03 December 2007:
> > On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior Franz wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > let use of deprecated "noshadow" prefix cause error message
> >
> > Will that m
501 - 600 of 687 matches
Mail list logo
