I noticed as some other have also that flying from KSFO to KSFO via vor
VTU results in a crash.
After Pigeon looking at it it he noticed that setting --vor=VTU at the
command line will result in the following error message ebing repeated
serveral hundred times. This applies for KSFO, fgfs loads fi
On Saturday 29 April 2006 22:20, Rob Oates wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Robicd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd suggest you use a BitTorrent tracker too. You will only need to make
> > a seeder host stay online for the time you like and download/upload
> > bandwidth will be shared among clients. Big file
On 4/29/06, Robicd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd suggest you use a BitTorrent tracker too. You will only need to makea seeder host stay online for the time you like and download/upload
bandwidth will be shared among clients. Big files like .iso images arewell distributed inside such p2p networks.
Martin Spott wrote:
Hello,
Pigeon is preparing to have a "LinuxTag edition" of his FGLive
FlightGear live CD. As we don't have the monetary ressources to produce
a noticeable amount of CD's to give away, we intend to place the ISO
image on as many servers as possible and would like to put striki
I'd suggest you use a BitTorrent tracker too. You will only need to make
a seeder host stay online for the time you like and download/upload
bandwidth will be shared among clients. Big files like .iso images are
well distributed inside such p2p networks.
Roberto
-
On Saturday 29 April 2006 10:09, flying.toaster wrote:
> Just one question before I get started ...
>
> What is the "reasonnable" polygon count (in triangles or quads) that can
> be accepted by most platforms without turning into a slideshow ?
>
> For strike fighters this is somewhere in the 10,0
On Friday 28 April 2006 17:36, Justin Smithies wrote:
> Hi all,
>I'm trying to model a 777-200 and i've borrowed the
> autopilot from the 747 model.
> I've started making changes to the file so it reacts with the
> 777-200 model e.g 2 engines not 4 etc.
> One issue which i'm not sure ab
On Saturday 29 April 2006 16:09, flying.toaster wrote:
> Just one question before I get started ...
>
> What is the "reasonnable" polygon count (in triangles or quads) that can
> be accepted by most platforms without turning into a slideshow ?
>
> For strike fighters this is somewhere in the 10,0
I could post your iso file on my ftp site (ftp://kingmont.com).
Flightgear is already "mirrored" there, and Curt has the ability to upload
to that location.
I'll create a "fglive" directory there.
jj
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Spott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: list.flightg
"flying.toaster" wrote:
> For strike fighters this is somewhere in the 10,000 range (with a
> damage model).
The F-14 has a rather complex geometry so I'd say you are supposed to
exceed the usual average,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
flying.toaster schrieb:
> Just one question before I get started ...
>
> What is the "reasonnable" polygon count (in triangles or quads) that can be
> accepted by most platforms without turning into a slideshow ?
>
> For strike fighters this is som
Just one question before I get started ...
What is the "reasonnable" polygon count (in triangles or quads) that can be
accepted by most platforms without turning into a slideshow ?
For strike fighters this is somewhere in the 10,000 range (with a damage
model).
I have come to realise that
Hello,
Pigeon is preparing to have a "LinuxTag edition" of his FGLive
FlightGear live CD. As we don't have the monetary ressources to produce
a noticeable amount of CD's to give away, we intend to place the ISO
image on as many servers as possible and would like to put striking
announcements on the
> Though seriously, excellent work. I hope you are/will be caching the
> generated images, rather than generating them every view.
It's Google Map. Images are from google fetched on the fly from your
browser, nothing much is generated or cached at the FG tracker server
side.
Pigeon.
-
On Saturday 29 April 2006 07:57 am, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> It seems that in the pitch channel for the A-4 the pilot commands normal
> acceleration. The Az error is computed, and that is differenced with pitch
> rate. That error drives the elevator. See the A-4 section here:
Yes, I just now found t
> Anyone here know if the A-4 had a pitch SAS?
>
> Dave
Dave:
It seems that in the pitch channel for the A-4 the pilot commands normal
acceleration. The Az error is computed, and that is differenced with pitch
rate. That error drives the elevator. See the A-4 section here:
http://www.jsbsim.org/
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 09:01 +0100, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Ron
>
>
> > > I have
> > > also taken the opportunity to adjust the panel to make it more nearly
> > like
> > > that of an A4F, rather than an A4C, although a couple of the instruments
> > are
> > > not correct, principally the ASI should
Hugo Vincent wrote:
Thanks Erik,
Here is the patch. Let me know what needs to be changed, fixed, or
refactored before it can go into CVS. Note that at this point, the
binary protocol is output only.
I've made some small changes (mainly changing printf to SG_LOG, etc) and
committed it to CVS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robicd schrieb:
>> The usual way (the only one?) to create mirrors is to render the scenery
>> (at least) twice.
>
> I wonder if it's easy to implement, I don't know how SimGear/Plib handle
> that (if it's even possible). That should not be a real dro
Anyone here know if the A-4 had a pitch SAS?
Dave
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Ser
The usual way (the only one?) to create mirrors is to render the scenery
(at least) twice.
I wonder if it's easy to implement, I don't know how SimGear/Plib handle
that (if it's even possible). That should not be a real drop down in
performance since the mirror has a very small area to render.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robicd schrieb:
> There are mirrors inside, for the pilots (look at
> http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-detail-cp-canopy-01l.jpg); I wonder if
> there's a way with FGFS to create those mirrors, some kind of
> picture-in-picture technique :-)
The usual way
Robicd wrote:
> Are such mirrors used in Civil Aviation A/C too?
The "Remorqueur", the Robin DR400/180R typically has a mirror that
allows the pilot to look at the glider behind while towing. This is one
flavour, althogh the mirrors I have seen on such an aircraft typically
look a bit more 'elega
> Are such mirrors used in Civil Aviation A/C too?
Yep, those that are towing sailplanes sometimes have a mirror.
That should be an interesting thing for multiplayer: one pilot flying the
towing plane and one is in the sailplane.
Torsten
---
There are mirrors inside, for the pilots (look at
http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-detail-cp-canopy-01l.jpg); I wonder if
there's a way with FGFS to create those mirrors, some kind of
picture-in-picture technique :-)
Or should that be implemented in the code?
Are such mirrors used in Civil Aviatio
> http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-detail-dimensions.htm
>
> in case you need some more info :-)
Excellent source.
Jon
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techn
http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-detail-dimensions.htm
in case you need some more info :-)
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:15 -0400, Julien Pierru wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> Some a you have already taken advantage of the tracker capability of
> the online multiplay. Here is an example of what is coming:
> http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/?FUNCT=FLIGHT&FLIGHTID=411
>
> No i wasn't drunk when
> To me this page is empty !?
He must have been changing things.
Try this:
http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/?FUNCT=FLIGHT&FLIGHTID=418
Pigeon.
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
interesting the link got corrupted, this should work:
http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/?FUNCT=FLIGHT&FLIGHTID=411
"Julien Pierru" wrote:
> Some a you have already taken advantage of the tracker capability of the
> online multiplay. Here is an example of what is coming:
> http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/?FUNCT=3DFLIGHT&FLIGHTID=3D411
To me this page is empty !?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user frie
Detlef Faber wrote:
> The hardest part will be the Flight Model, sweep wings, a pair of
> retractable trim wings and a supersonic flight envelope. But it would be
> a great addition to FG. ( I loved playing Microprose's F14 Fleet
> Defender).
The IRIX operating system contains a simple but terrib
Am Freitag, den 28.04.2006, 20:42 +0200 schrieb flying.toaster:
> If a 3D exterior model is needed I will contribute (blender)
> I have an Aerofax on the tomcat with lots of pictures.
> I'm interested in the B (A+) make since the nozzles are the
> smooth F110 ones and the avionics still are a lit
Selon Melchior FRANZ :
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 29 April 2006 06:28:
> > * Frederic Bouvier -- Saturday 29 April 2006 00:00:
> > > Perhaps you already noticed, but I checked a change to model.cxx that
> > > allow PLIB, with its own mecanism, to reuse textures from models to
> models.
> >
> >
Dave
> > I committed a new facility for the A4F yesterday. It now has a
> functioning
> > AAR capability with YASim, like the one already available for JSBSim.
> ...
>
> Great. I can't wait to try it out. BTW, now I can stop using the T-38 as
> a
> refueling demonstrator :) It's still a radar
Ron
> > I have
> > also taken the opportunity to adjust the panel to make it more nearly
> like
> > that of an A4F, rather than an A4C, although a couple of the instruments
> are
> > not correct, principally the ASI should be replaced with a combined
> ASI/Mach
> > instrument.
>
> Take a look a
36 matches
Mail list logo
