[Flightgear-devel] Serious simmer

2007-09-19 Thread Jon S. Berndt
Check this out. Serious simmer: http://mysite.verizon.net/antonioe/index.html Jon - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG vs. trees and buildings

2007-09-19 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Megginson wrote: > What are the issues with OSG around dynamic scenery (trees, non-static > randomly-placed buildings, 3D clouds, etc.)? Is it just a matter of > spending a few hours coding, or is there something in the OSG APIs > that makes dyn

[Flightgear-devel] OSG vs. trees and buildings

2007-09-19 Thread David Megginson
What are the issues with OSG around dynamic scenery (trees, non-static randomly-placed buildings, 3D clouds, etc.)? Is it just a matter of spending a few hours coding, or is there something in the OSG APIs that makes dynamically-generated scenery difficult? All the best, David ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG vs. trees and buildings

2007-09-19 Thread Heiko Schulz
A very new one - the big effort to the old plib one is, that the new code creates the characteristics of towns and landscapes: american towns will have a other structure like european ones, big towns other than small towns - that's the big effort he works on. --- David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG vs. trees and buildings

2007-09-19 Thread David Megginson
On 19/09/2007, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sebastian Bechthold is working on that- he is working > about a implemention of an "object placer" which > automatic places buildings to right textures/ > materials. If there is a town, so there are buildings > depending of it is industrial

[Flightgear-devel] Hangar One at Moffett Field

2007-09-19 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, I've created a simple model of Hangar One at Moffett Field for inclusion in CVS. I don't know whether the data/Scenery directory is synched from the scenery DB, or whether it is independant. Either way, the model and .stg diff is available from http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/han

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG vs. trees and buildings

2007-09-19 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, Sebastian Bechthold is working on that- he is working about a implemention of an "object placer" which automatic places buildings to right textures/ materials. If there is a town, so there are buildings depending of it is industrial or normal life or anything else Have a look into the ge

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG vs. trees and buildings

2007-09-19 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, here one of the scrrenshots which he presented in the german forum: http://www.rotblind.de/fgstuff/autogen/hamburg.jpg Hopefully he don't matter to show here Ask him- I'm sure he appreciate some help Greetings HHS --- David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > What are the issues wit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread David Megginson
On 19/09/2007, Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome back and thanks for the compliments! As for versions: No, there isn't > a 1.0 in sight yet, but I'm currently trying to help Curt in getting ready > for a new release soon. This will be a plib based release, called 0.9.1[1]. I didn't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread Sergey
Hi Durk, On 9/20/07, Durk Talsma wrote: > Currently, the situation isn't as clear anymore, because the OSG version also > has many new features which the PLib version doesn't, but on the other hand, > because of that, the plib version might be a bit more stable. For that, and > for logistical r

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Sergey, On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:04, Sergey wrote: > > >This will be a plib based release > > But why not osg release ? > If it concerns windows - then I just perfectly compiled it on windows > ( I intend to develop a series of lessons for programmers to use > FlightGear). > At the t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread Sergey
Hi Durk, I'm new to the list. So I do not know much on previous discussions, sorry for that. But on >This will be a plib based release But why not osg release ? If it concerns windows - then I just perfectly compiled it on windows ( I intend to develop a series of lessons for programmers to us

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread Durk Talsma
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 21:50, David Megginson wrote: > On 19/09/2007, Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Welcome back and thanks for the compliments! As for versions: No, there > > isn't a 1.0 in sight yet, but I'm currently trying to help Curt in > > getting ready for a new release

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread Durk Talsma
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 21:28, I wrote: > This will be a plib based release, called 0.9.1. Uh, should be 0.9.11 D. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi David, On Wednesday 19 September 2007 21:17, David Megginson wrote: > 3. Still no version 1.0, Curt? > > I don't have a lot of time to contribute, but I might try to help with > #2, if anyone can point me to archived messages or other resources > discussing the problem. > > Welcome back and th

[Flightgear-devel] Looks great

2007-09-19 Thread David Megginson
I have a new notebook (an HP TX1220, which is a stunningly beautiful machine), and decided to try compiling the latest CVS osg FlightGear instead of using the old precompiled plib version from the Ubuntu distro. Here are some comments: 1. Wow! The program is looking great. It was a very nice su

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgcom is now available partially static linked

2007-09-19 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi all, On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:03:00AM +0200, Mirko Stanisak wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 schrieb Holger Wirtz: > > Hi all, > > > > I have put a new version (1.0.1) as a partially static linked binary in > > the tarball of fgcom. The new binary got the libiaxclient-2.1svn,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgcom is now available partially static linked

2007-09-19 Thread Mirko Stanisak
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 schrieb Holger Wirtz: > Hi all, > > I have put a new version (1.0.1) as a partially static linked binary in > the tarball of fgcom. The new binary got the libiaxclient-2.1svn, > libspeex and libgsm static linked. I hope this solves problems with > these librarie

[Flightgear-devel] Now problems with Thinkpad (Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML), too

2007-09-19 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, I wrote about my ATI problems at my home notebook. Now I just testet a Thinkpad T60 with a Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML chipset which worked on LinuxTag2007 with FG. I checked out the newest code and after compiling and running I get: $ fgfs --airport=KSFO --aircraft=ATC Warning