Hi,
I have some question.
I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It isn't there?
I also want to ask if it is possible visualize hotspots, I remember that I
read some plans about it.
Thanks,
Madr
--
Martin Dressler
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.musicabona
Jim Wilson writes:
> :-) BTW the menu work is looking great!
Thanks -- feel free to try your hand at a dialog or two. This is a
good time for experimentation.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Martin Dressler writes:
> I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It
> isn't there?
It's showing up for me. Do you have the latest CVS code?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
__
I believe something has to be fixed before:
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
Do you know how you get there ? This happens when you try taxiing below the
airport building :-))
I suppose this should be changed before you start offering bridges to the
people - t
Alex Perry writes:
> In any case, I'll try to give the instruments a careful flight
> testing.
Thanks. Please look especially carefully at the magnetic compass -- I
tried to copy your algorithm, but I'm not sure that all the
acceleration and turning errors made it through.
> It's now up to y
Hi,
In my ongoing quest to implement a FSD (protocol used in SquakBox) client
for FlightGear, I've read the Protocol Info document located at
http://www.simclients.com/ProtoDev-InfoForProspectiveDevelopers.doc (word
document, 103 kb) and at page 2 section 4 it reads:
"The group is protected by a
David Megginson writes:
> Jim Wilson writes:
>
> > :-) BTW the menu work is looking great!
>
> Thanks -- feel free to try your hand at a dialog or two. This is a
> good time for experimentation.
David,
>From very brief look, the "File->Reset" function does not appear
to be functional.
Also,
Mathew,
> "The group is protected by an agreement, made between each
> developer and the
> group (as a whole) which prevents disclosure of privileged communications.
Neither my flying skills nor my spare time are sufficient for taking part in
Vatsim :-(
However, I know that there are a few compe
On Mon 27. January 2003 13:40, you wrote:
> Martin Dressler writes:
> > I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It
> > isn't there?
>
> It's showing up for me. Do you have the latest CVS code?
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
> David
Hmmm, It is there, but I'm still missing it in
Martin Dressler writes:
> On Mon 27. January 2003 13:40, you wrote:
> > Martin Dressler writes:
> > > I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It
> > > isn't there?
> >
> > It's showing up for me. Do you have the latest CVS code?
> >
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> >
> > David
On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 01:27 pm, Michael Basler wrote:
Neither my flying skills nor my spare time are sufficient for taking
part in
Vatsim :-(
Me too ...
However, I know that there are a few competiting networks a la Vatsim
present or just emerging and I read several quite sharp d
Martin Spott writes:
> I believe something has to be fixed before:
>
> http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
>
>
> Do you know how you get there ? This happens when you try taxiing below the
> airport building :-))
> I suppose this should be changed before you st
Martin Spott writes:
> I believe something has to be fixed before:
>
> http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
>
>
> Do you know how you get there ? This happens when you try taxiing below the
> airport building :-))
Yes, I've noticed the same thing. I thou
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> Also, the presets dialog doesn't appear to do anything when you click
> "ok" or "apply".
OK and apply copy the values from the dialog to the presets; they do
not apply the presets. We probably need to make that more intuitive.
All the best,
David
--
David Meggin
Thanks
Only one small note to David. Shouldn't be gui directory in base package
named Gui. All other directories start with capital letter.
Madr
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear
Norman Vine writes:
> 3) What is really needed for flying under bridges is a general
> purpose 3D collision detection support which the scenery hitlist
> routine is not. It is only designed to report the height of the
> highest point at the location of the intersection with the terrrain
> scenegra
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:28:38 +1100,
"Mathew McBride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<01c2c604$edb005a0$390a32d2@m7r4m2>:
> Basically they are making this protocol proprietary so no one can
> develop crap clients.
...and in the process, _junks_ any and all open source licensed "crap"
David Megginson writes:
> Curtis L. Olson writes:
>
> > Also, the presets dialog doesn't appear to do anything when you click
> > "ok" or "apply".
>
> OK and apply copy the values from the dialog to the presets; they do
> not apply the presets. We probably need to make that more intuitive.
Is
Hello Norman,
> Martin Spott writes:
>> I believe something has to be fixed before:
>>
>> http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
[...]
> 1) Don't know why there is a large unrendered area
What you're calling 'unrendered area' is supposed to be the untextured roof
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> Is there any mechanism yet to "apply" the presets? I haven't been
> able to find it.
Yes, the big button at the top that says "Revert to Defaults" (since
we're setting default values). Please feel free to play around with
the dialog to make it more intuitive.
> Als
Martin Spott writes:
>
> >> I believe something has to be fixed before:
> >>
> >> http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
> [...]
> > 1) Don't know why there is a large unrendered area
>
> What you're calling 'unrendered area' is supposed to be the untextured roof
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:17:05PM -0800, ace project wrote:
> Well, the engine I'm building is designed to be as
> non-intrusive as possible (it loads as a FGSubsystem,
> so only a entry in main.cpp is needed and it starts up
> only if it sees a entry in the properties list when
> the Flight Gear
David Megginson writes:
> Curtis L. Olson writes:
> Yes, the big button at the top that says "Revert to Defaults" (since
> we're setting default values). Please feel free to play around with
> the dialog to make it more intuitive.
Ok, will do ...
> > Also when I try to select "File->Reset" I ge
<..>
> Hi and thanks for the info. I was kind of expecting
> there to be a coordinated
> effort to add multiplayer support to FlightGear,
> with various tasks on the
> table and regular commits so everyone could see what
> was going on. From what
> you've said it sounds like various multiplaye
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:00:40 -0600,
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In many of the higher end commercial sims they build invisible walls
> underneath bridges to discourage illegal or unwise behavior ... :-)
>
> Curt.
...which would warrant both run
Arnt Karlsen writes:
> ...which would warrant both runtime and compile time options like
> "--build-invisible-walls-under-bridges", and "--tip-fbi"... ;-)
I'd prefer "--tip-interpol": after all, this is an international
project.
Sometimes there are legitimate reasons to fly under something --
JSBsim as today in CVS doesn't compile with MSVC 7. Classes FGTurboJet,
FGTurboProp, FGTurboShaft are not in the JSBsim namespace. I don't know
if it is intended. If yes, there is a need for a 'using namespace JSBSim;'
directive. In addition, the map in FGSwitch doesn't compile with const,
that is
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 12:27, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> JSBsim as today in CVS doesn't compile with MSVC 7. Classes FGTurboJet,
> FGTurboProp, FGTurboShaft
These can be removed from the project. They should not be in FG cvs and
I will remove them shortly.
> are not in the JSBsim namespace. I do
So, I am on the verge of 'snapping' with respect to our current
aeronautical data, and am wondering how to proceed. I was looking at
what at other software does for their aeronautical data, and most of
the FS2k2 ones I know about are getting their data from:
http://www.navdata.at/
Now, those d
James Turner writes:
> So ... what sort of approach should I be investigating? Would we want
> to support loading the 'raw' DAFIF data into flightgear, so people can
> just download it directly to update to a new AIRAC cycle, or is that
> way too much data to contemplate? I'm still trying t
I subscribe to the FAA Digital Aeronautical Information (DAI) CD. In
addition, a copy of the current CD is on the FG website. The CD contains
FAA approved airways, Navaids, digital obstacles, etc. At least for the
US, the data is a very good place to start.
Hoyt Fleming
___
Jim Wilson wrote:
Root? I doubt it. Although, I suppose it _will_ run under root just like
anything else ;-)
Best,
Jim
Moments later, the well-crafted exploit hits the end of the buffer and
makes the jump to kernel space.
(reminds me of Unix Wars ;)
__
Dave, would it be possible to have three different methods of cycling, namely:
wrap example: 1-2-3-1-2-3-1...
reverseexample: 1-2-3-2-1-2-3...
none example: 1-2-3-3-3-3-3...
The reverse method would work nicely with a 3 position switch (i.e.
LEFT-BOTH-RIGHT).
The none met
Brandon Bergren writes:
> Jim Wilson wrote:
> > Root? I doubt it. Although, I suppose it _will_ run under root just like
> > anything else ;-)
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Jim
>
> Moments later, the well-crafted exploit hits the end of the buffer and
> makes the jump to kernel space.
>
> (reminds m
David Megginson wrote:
Hoyt A. Fleming writes:
> There was a discussion quite a while back about decreasing the
> terrain level of detail (LOD) as the terrain distance increased so
> that frame rates could be increased. Do you know if that LOD
> concept looked promising for FG?
Continuous L
Gene Buckle wrote:
Norman Vine writes:
> could you translate 'light singles' into 'american' :-)
I don't get the joke without seeing the picture -- are the planes
David's referring to bigger than light singles?
AFAIK, it's just a bad cheese joke and has nothing to do with airplanes.
:)
g.
Brandon Bergren writes:
> Gene Buckle wrote:
> >>Norman Vine writes:
> >>
> >> > could you translate 'light singles' into 'american' :-)
> >>
> >>I don't get the joke without seeing the picture -- are the planes
> >>David's referring to bigger than light singles?
> >>
> >
> >
> > AFAIK, it's jus
There is still the FGSwitch patch needed. Here again.
Cheers,
-Fred
D:\FlightGear\cvs\FlightGear\src\FDM\JSBSim>cvs -z3 -q diff -u
Index: filtersjb/FGSwitch.h
===
RCS file:
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/FDM/JSBSim/filtersjb
> There is still the FGSwitch patch needed. Here again.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Fred
> - map mComparison;
Actually, the change to FGSwitch can remove the whole line.
Fixed and committed.
Jon
smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature
Here is a better patch :
D:\FlightGear\cvs\FlightGear\src\FDM\JSBSim>cvs -z3 -q diff -u
Index: filtersjb/FGSwitch.cpp
===
RCS file:
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/FDM/JSBSim/filtersjb/FGSwitch.cpp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
dif
40 matches
Mail list logo
