So, I finally broke down over the weekend, getting so frustrated with a the GPU
not powering up under Linux that I installed FG on Windows.
If I want to get FG last stable under Fedora 17, I have to compile it myself,
only 2.6 is on the repo. The process is probably similar to compiling current
On Monday 26 November 2012 09:45:51 Renk Thorsten wrote:
> I am genuinely at a loss here. A normal Linux user has practically no change
> to get last stable on his box running if it isn't in his distro - a normal
> Windows user gets everything nice and streamlined.
>
> Does anyone else understand
So, some of my impressions of how FG runs on the GeForce 670M (Windows).
* in default terrain (I did Nevada, going with the F-16 from KNID to KLSV), all
procedural effects in atmospheric light scattering on, some snow on the Sierra
Nevada, 120 km max. visibility range, some Cirrus cloud develop
2012/11/26 Renk Thorsten
>
> So, some of my impressions of how FG runs on the GeForce 670M (Windows).
>
> * in default terrain (I did Nevada, going with the F-16 from KNID to
> KLSV), all procedural effects in atmospheric light scattering on, some snow
> on the Sierra Nevada, 120 km max. visibili
On 26 Nov 2012, at 09:59, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> The nice thing is: the openSUSE Build Service is not limited to openSUSE.
> Packages can be created for Debian, Fedora, Mandriva and Ubuntu as well. And
> once you got that set up, it's very little work to maintain.
>
> I think this could be a
The TR1133 was an early 4-channel vhf transceiver for the Royal Air Force
(RAF). It had a metal case that contained the Transmitter and Receiver
units, etc. The TR1133 was fitted to a number of RAF fighter aircraft in
1940. The TR1143 was effectively an improved, production version of the
TR1
> * strange bug - all generated clouds (on Linux and Wndows) used only one
> texture of a multi-texture sheet, which gives some odd repetitions. This
> may be something trivial (my binary and FGData snapshots are a few days
> apart) so if there's been work on clouds in the mean time it could
Hi,
I have added VOR, localizer and glideslope signal calculations for the old
(classic) navradios (navradio.cxx)
Now an ILS navaid is basically considered as two separate stations: Localizer
and glideslope, as in reality. Both these stations can have separate
parameters like transmitter power,
On 26 Nov 2012, at 17:11, Adrian Musceac wrote:
> I have added VOR, localizer and glideslope signal calculations for the old
> (classic) navradios (navradio.cxx)
> Now an ILS navaid is basically considered as two separate stations: Localizer
> and glideslope, as in reality. Both these stations
On Monday, November 26, 2012 19:18:26 James Turner wrote:
>
> I'll do a review if no-one beats me to it, but this definitely needs to be
> 'off-by-default' for the next release. We can add a checkbox to the
> realism dialog to enable it from the GUI, and give aircraft authors a
> chance to adapt.
On Monday, November 26, 2012 19:18:26 James Turner wrote:
> I'll do a review if no-one beats me to it, but this definitely needs to be
> 'off-by-default' for the next release. We can add a checkbox to the
> realism dialog to enable it from the GUI, and give aircraft authors a
> chance to adapt.
>
Am 25.11.2012 16:27, schrieb ThorstenB:
> Yes, same here, the left engine starts more easily. This means there
> already is excess fuel in the left engine's carburator at startup - it
> happens in RL, too. Let's assume it's not a bug, but another realistic
> detail Torsten has intentionally modelle
Yesterday I updated SimGear, FlightGear and Data directory from the git
repository.
System is Debian Squeeze with Nvidia graphics driver.
After updating I get the following result when running FlightGear.
Sqlite error:PRIMARY KEY must be unique while running: INSERT
INTO taxi
On Sunday, November 25, 2012 15:55:44 Eric van den Berg wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
> I have been looking at the atmosperic system of flightgear and altitude
> and airspeed calcs in particular. I have been checking it for
> correctness and later looked a bit in the code.
>
> I must admit that I am not
Personally I've moved to Ubuntu 10.04 as I couldn't get my
soundcard working anymore on Suse ca. back in 2009.
I've never looked back and probably never ever use again Suse...
--- On Mon, 11/26/12, Renk Thorsten wrote:
> From: Renk Thorsten
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Musings on FG on L
> Binary releases on Linux are /possible/ but a pain - working with each
> distro's packaging system is definitely the way to go, in my opinion.
That basically seems to require that everyone who wants most recent FG needs to
update to most recent Linux. Which is something which according to my
16 matches
Mail list logo
