Peter B. West wrote:
I mentioned the need for a logo some months ago to an acquaintance of
mine who is a graphics design student. She came up with some
interesting ideas, but they were incomplete the last time I spoke to her
(just before Christmas.) I will try to get in touch with her
On 12.01.2003 11:40:57 Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
After having tried to understand how fop works by just reading the code for
a couple of hours now, FOrtress inevitably comes to my mind ;-)
(in the sense of: Not easy to get in, at least for a newbie)
:-) Unfortunately, Fortress is already
jeremias2003/01/13 02:21:45
Modified:src/documentation skinconf.xml
Log:
Fixes DTD and enables FOP logo for PDF files.
Submitted by: Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +10 -5 xml-fop/src/documentation/skinconf.xml
Index: skinconf.xml
On 12.01.2003 04:59:36 Jeff Turner wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:43:37PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi Jeff
I've applied your patches locally. Thanks. Everything's ok with the
first one, but with the second one I'm having problems (not your fault!):
- I had to add adjust the
Is it OK if I just throw out some usage patterns in the embedding
documentation? There's some contradicting information there and also
stuff that isn't that easy to understand. InputHandler and friends dates
back to pre-JAXP times. JAXP is known to most users doing embedding and
is most natural to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Is it OK if I just throw out some usage patterns in the embedding
documentation? There's some contradicting information there and also
stuff that isn't that easy to understand. InputHandler and friends dates
back to pre-JAXP times. JAXP is known to most users doing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Is there an XML version of the tables in
http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html?
Alternatively, I'd be interested to have the compliance information
(comments) merged into Chuck Paussa's FO/FOP schema.
Either way, if nobody is doing it already, then I volunteer.
Benoit Maisonny
--
Yes, see here:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/compliance.xml?rev=1.5content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
Volunteers are always welcome. :-)
What exactly would you like to do with it?
On 13.01.2003 12:52:29 Benoit Maisonny wrote:
Hi,
Is there an XML
Why don't we announce a competition.
I've been thinking of writing to this list for a while to offer
'graphic' help to the project (My background is Art Design not CS) and
would love to take part :-)
regards
Andy
I've read the PDF/X FAQ and there seems to be more than only PDF/X-3.
There are at least 5 standards. Scary thing.
Anyway, I think it should be possible to make the PDF library
configurable to generate PDF 1.3 only. But implementing even one of the
PDF/X standards can't be a current topic for us
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16023.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jeremias2003/01/13 08:25:14
xml-fop/examples/servlet - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 08:25:47
xml-fop/examples/servlet/conf - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 08:25:55
xml-fop/examples/servlet/lib - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 08:25:59
xml-fop/examples/servlet/src - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 08:27:14
Added: examples/servlet Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain .cvsignore README
build.bat build.sh build.xml
examples/servlet/conf Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain web.xml
examples/servlet/lib Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
jeremias2003/01/13 08:28:39
Removed: contrib/servlet Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain .cvsignore README
build.bat build.sh build.xml
contrib/servlet/conf Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain web.xml
contrib/servlet/lib Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
I like it. First of all FOP is well-known among the whole xml
community for ages (what costs much) and secondly fop word has a
Yes, this is the primary consideration. The only reason why I mention it now
at all is that changing such things is always better done sooner
jeremias2003/01/13 08:35:13
xml-fop/src/foschema - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 08:35:58
Added: src/foschema Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain fop.xsd fop4f.xsd
schema2completion.xsl schema2dtd.xsl
Log:
Moved over from docs/foschema
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
jeremias2003/01/13 08:36:40
Removed: docs/foschema Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain fop.xsd fop4f.xsd
schema2completion.xsl schema2dtd.xsl
Log:
Moved over to src/foschema
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Benoit Maisonny wrote:
This looks perfect for my needs!
I am working on an FO quick reference that includes compliance
information for fop and xep.
A couple of caveats: 1) The html version on our website is misleading
because the color-coding is scrubbed out in our forrest conversion (I am
Hi there
There's a xslfoRef.xml containing a small reference for XSL-FO. An
XSLT exists for converting the reference to FO. It still reflects the
Candidate Recommendation, so it is outdated. Can I simply delete it or
should I move it somewhere, too?
It's the only thing left in the docs directory
jeremias2003/01/13 10:08:21
xml-fop/examples/fo - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:08:34
xml-fop/examples/fo/tables - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:08:39
xml-fop/examples/fo/svg - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:08:43
xml-fop/examples/fo/region_body - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:08:47
xml-fop/examples/fo/pagination - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:08:52
xml-fop/examples/fo/markers - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:08:56
xml-fop/examples/fo/keeps_and_breaks - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:09:01
xml-fop/examples/fo/graphics - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:09:06
xml-fop/examples/fo/footnotes - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:09:10
xml-fop/examples/fo/basic - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jeremias2003/01/13 10:09:14
xml-fop/examples/fo/advanced - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Can we sketch that on the Wiki in some simple way? Defining some Java
interfaces and things like that? Anyway, as you mentioned we should sort
out things like Session and Document on another page first.
OK, I just put a proposal out there in the section discussing
jeremias2003/01/13 10:23:56
Added: examples/fo Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain .cvsignore build.xml
runtests.bat runtests.sh
examples/fo/advanced Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain cid-fonts.fo
cid-fonts.pdf giro.fo test_ja.fo
jeremias2003/01/13 10:29:13
Removed: docs/examples Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain .cvsignore build.xml
results.html runtests.bat runtests.sh
docs/examples/advanced Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain cid-fonts.fo
cid-fonts.pdf giro.fo
jeremias2003/01/13 10:31:33
Removed: docs/graphics Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain fop.jpg linux.bmp
listgeometry.gif page.gif xml_fax.tif
xml_feather.gif xml_feather_transparent.gif
Log:
Moved over to examples/fo/graphics
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Yes, but on a new Wiki page on the new API. We've got to scratch
together what already has been discussed and put that on that page.
I made a page behind the Avalonization link, currently
focussing on API issues.
Someone with more Avalon background should add internal
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
There's a xslfoRef.xml containing a small reference for XSL-FO. An
XSLT exists for converting the reference to FO. It still reflects the
Candidate Recommendation, so it is outdated. Can I simply delete it or
should I move it somewhere, too?
Keep it for the moment. I think
On Monday 13 January 2003 11:01, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
feeling inspired by your's and Oleg's suggestions and also a little
bit bored this Sunday afternoon, I thought I'll take the chance and
improve my Gimping skills. Here's the result :-)
Not bad. Something like
On Monday 13 January 2003 11:05, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.01.2003 11:40:57 Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
After having tried to understand how fop works by just reading the
code for a couple of hours now, FOrtress inevitably comes to my mind
;-) (in the sense of: Not easy to get in, at least
Cool, thanks.
On 13.01.2003 19:57:46 J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
There's a xslfoRef.xml containing a small reference for XSL-FO. An
XSLT exists for converting the reference to FO. It still reflects the
Candidate Recommendation, so it is outdated. Can I simply delete it or
Very good. I'll start adding to it as soon as I've finished moving files
around and documenting the embedding samples.
On 13.01.2003 19:55:22 J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Yes, but on a new Wiki page on the new API. We've got to scratch
together what already has been discussed
Oleg:
I just added a comment on your bidi wiki, in the Reordering the text
section, regarding the line-by-line nature of reordering Middle-Eastern
language text. This is something you no doubt already know, but was not
clear to me until recently, and it may be helpful. The comments might be
Gang,
I just added some newish comments to the overconstraint wiki page. Not much, but it's
something. I know some people out there said they had some things to add...please do.
I'm hoping to get this ball rolling so that development can get underway as Keiron's
work on layout continues.
On 13.01.2003 19:18:18 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Can we sketch that on the Wiki in some simple way? Defining some Java
interfaces and things like that? Anyway, as you mentioned we should sort
out things like Session and Document on another page first.
OK, I just put a
On 11.01.2003 18:35:37 Victor Mote wrote:
Keiron Liddle wrote:
If I understand it correctly we could have:
- multiple output targets for one rendering run
- targets with the same font metrics can layout to a common area tree
- targets with similar or substitute metrics could force
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15985.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15985.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
pietsch 2003/01/13 13:05:13
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps AWTStarter.java
CommandLineOptions.java CommandLineStarter.java
Driver.java ErrorHandler.java FOInputHandler.java
FOPException.java Fop.java
Victor Mote wrote:
It must be a cultural thing. The dictionary definition you gave should tell
the story well enough -- see the example felt contempt for the mincing
The word is a pejorative, but perhaps more so in my part of the world,
where calling someone a fop or a dandy might be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15985.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15985.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
On Monday 13 January 2003 11:01, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
feeling inspired by your's and Oleg's suggestions and also a little
bit bored this Sunday afternoon, I thought I'll take the chance and
improve my Gimping skills. Here's the result :-)
At 04:34 PM 1/13/03, you wrote:
Maybe. But IMHO the letters FOP should be easily readable and the whole
logo shouldn't be too overloaded with additional stuff.
Yes, but that still leaves quite a bit of room for font experimentation.
I cannot resist -
How many programmers does it take to
Hello all,
I have looked over the list and have found references to the fact that
the reference-orientation element is not currently implemented, and the
suggestion that rotating text can be accomplished by embedding svg.
However, a cursory examination of svg seems to indicate that there is no
Ralph LaChance wrote:
At 04:34 PM 1/13/03, you wrote:
Maybe. But IMHO the letters FOP should be easily readable and the
whole logo shouldn't be too overloaded with additional stuff.
Yes, but that still leaves quite a bit of room for font experimentation.
I cannot resist -
How many
Angus Stewart wrote:
1.To the best of your knowledge (as I know this is not the SVG list)
- Does SVG support external fonts?
You'll have to install your font with the AWT. I have no idea
how easy or complicated this is. If you are running Unix+X it is
probably enough to register the font
Peter B. West wrote:
Re my comment on this, I thought I should warn you that I am addicted to
ironical jokes, which can be a dangerous habit with email. I dislike
emoticons, probably because I am more of a snob than I like to admit,
but also because they seem to me to discourage any attempt
Victor Mote wrote:
We're OK. I caught your irony. My response was really entirely to Oleg's
question. However, I really was concerned about offending someone -- things
like names and logos carry a certain emotional weight.
In other words, I might worry about offending some on this list, but it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15936.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15936.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16047.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 13.01.2003 23:24:49 J.Pietschmann wrote:
Angus Stewart wrote:
1.To the best of your knowledge (as I know this is not the SVG list)
- Does SVG support external fonts?
You'll have to install your font with the AWT. I have no idea
how easy or complicated this is. If you are running
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15936.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It is very possible that I am missing something, but our memory-lean
event-based model would seem to dictate either 1) parsing the document
twice, or 2) not allowing multiple output formats in the same document.
I think my approach could work in this
71 matches
Mail list logo
