cvs commit: xml-fop NOTICE

pbwest 2004/02/06 22:20:22 Added: .Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design NOTICE Log: Accompanies Licence 2.0 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.1 +7 -0 xml-fop/Attic/NOTICE ---

cvs commit: xml-fop LICENSE

pbwest 2004/02/06 22:18:16 Added: .Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design LICENSE Log: Licence 2.0 Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.4.12.2 +201 -47 xml-fop/LICENSE ---

Re: (Peter) Re: Just a small question...

No big deal--but I do wish to add that my phrasing that you were *intentionally* trying to attribute Andreas' quotes to me was wrong, and I do apologize for that. Anyway, let's get back to work... Glen --- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: __ Do you Ya

Re: (Peter) Re: Just a small question...

Glen Mazza wrote: Peter, Both of the remarks that Nikolai quoted [1] in leaving the list came from Andreas [2], not from me [3]. I was only stating the obvious in my warnings not to use their code. I don't appreciate you trying--for those who haven't been following the thread--to attribute Andre

Re: Contributions from competing products (was: Just a small question...)

--- Clay Leeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would posit that the *issue* of how to deal with > PATCH contributions > should be discussed so that a plan/protocol can be > achieved. This needs > to occur at least at the "project" (FOP) level > (possibly ending with a > VOTE), but should really

Re: Just a small question...

Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Peter / Nikolai, I think I should be the one to apologize here, as Nikolai seems to have been offended by one of *my* unreflected shoots from the hip --hey, sometimes I'm in the mood for joking. If the joke comes across bad, I appreciate it when people tell me that it ha

Re: Just a small question...

Glen Mazza wrote: [Pardon me, Peter, for more shooting from the hip...] Don't mention it, Glen (whose contributions we all value highly.) Peter -- Peter B. West

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xml-fop/xml-fop failed

Changes done. Gump should happily build FOP HEAD again next time. Jeremias Maerki

cvs commit: xml-fop build.xml

jeremias2004/02/06 13:51:01 Modified:.build.xml Log: Fix packaging of all-in-one transcoder JAR (due to changes in Commons IO). Revision ChangesPath 1.103 +3 -2 xml-fop/build.xml Index: build.xml

cvs commit: xml-fop/test/java/org/apache/fop/util ASCII85InputStreamTestCase.java

jeremias2004/02/06 13:49:48 Modified:test/java/org/apache/fop/util ASCII85InputStreamTestCase.java Log: Adapt to changes in Commons IO's APIs. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +3 -3 xml-fop/test/java/org/apache/fop/util/ASCII85InputStreamTestCa

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/truetype FontFileReader.java TTFDirTabEntry.java

jeremias2004/02/06 13:49:28 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf TempFileStreamCache.java PDFFactory.java src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/type1 PFMFile.java PFBParser.java src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/rtfli

cvs commit: xml-fop/lib commons-io-dev-20040206.jar commons-io-dev-20030703.jar

jeremias2004/02/06 13:48:30 Added: lib commons-io-dev-20040206.jar Removed: lib commons-io-dev-20030703.jar Log: Updating to latest Commons IO snapshot (Reason: API changes). Revision ChangesPath 1.1 xml-fop/lib/commons-io-dev-20040206

RE: Just a small question...

> -Original Message- > From: John Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I am surprised that MS or their minions at SCO haven't twigged to the > following scheme" > > They could 'set-up' Open Source by masquerading as some student > in netland and submit some provably proprietary code as o

RE: Just a small question...

> -Original Message- > From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nikolai, > > Please re-consider your decision. I, for one, am extremely pleased that > developers on other XSL-FO projects, especially ones so successful as > RenderX, are interested enough in FOP to monitor this list,

RE: Just a small question...

> -Original Message- > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I really appreciate your enthusiasm and am very happy, > upon you finding something possibly of use to FOP on > another ML, of your bringing it back to the team. We > should just be careful in this particular case, > how

Contributions from competing products (was: Just a small question...)

Although I am not a COMMITTER I feel I need to speak up here, having been one of the more recent recipients of Glen's "from-the-hip" comments. I was a bit shocked and dismayed at the lack of diplomacy in Glen's apparent attack on Andreas' original post[*] (included below for completeness). (BT

(Peter) Re: Just a small question...

Peter, Both of the remarks that Nikolai quoted [1] in leaving the list came from Andreas [2], not from me [3]. I was only stating the obvious in my warnings not to use their code. I don't appreciate you trying--for those who haven't been following the thread--to attribute Andreas' quotes to me.

Applying the ALv2 (Apache License 2.0)

For those who haven't seen it already: There's new information for applying the new license: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html Jeremias Maerki

Re: apologies to Nikolai Grigoriev? (was: Just a small question...)

I agree. 100%. Thanks, Bertrand, for speaking my mind. On 06.02.2004 08:26:58 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > executive summary: ARE YOU GUYS CRAZY? > > Le Jeudi, 5 fév 2004, à 21:28 Europe/Zurich, Nikolai Grigoriev a écrit : > > > I realize I was wrong when I answered to this forum - I could not >

apologies to Nikolai Grigoriev? (was: Just a small question...)

executive summary: ARE YOU GUYS CRAZY? Le Jeudi, 5 fév 2004, à 21:28 Europe/Zurich, Nikolai Grigoriev a écrit : I realize I was wrong when I answered to this forum - I could not expect my words to be interpreted this way. Please disregard my previous message; I also unsubscribe from the list, to

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xml-fop/xml-fop failed

Finally, Gump nags again and Batik builds again under Gump... We've changed a few things lately in Commons IO. Also, an initial release of Commons IO can be expected shortly. I'll do the necessary changes in a few hours and update the IO lib. On 06.02.2004 07:33:51 Sam Ruby wrote: > [javac]