Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-24 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Jay Chiu wrote: Glen, The reason that the svg portion does not work in Batik Squiggle is because of the namespace. The embedded svg needs svg: prefix and probably batik: prefix for flowText elements. Attached please find a svg file that works in squiggle. I tried three different ways to embed

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-23 Thread Glen Mazza
Quite possibly. FOP does not appear ready for your needs at this time. Glen --- Jay Chiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not seen the error [ERROR] findHyphenPoss: problem! in previous FOP versions. Could it be some recent change causing this problem? Thanks. Jay

Re: Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-21 Thread Glen Mazza
I think I got the same result you did. I'll look into the problem. Glen --- Jay Chiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got the hanging problem when I used command fop.bat xx.fo xx.pdf. However FOP does NOT hang, when I run it in IntelliJ. Probably it relates to the JDK classpath. But it seems

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Jay Chiu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for help. But the fop of cvs snapshot hangs on processing fo file. I tried today's packages, 20030919221605 and 20030919041528, untar'ed and ran build.bat to create fop.jar file on XP machine. Then I ran fop.bat

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: I've just been running the same test ( examples/fo/advanced/giro.fo ) and received the same 'hyphenation errors'. That's a known problem of the HEAD code. Are you sure you want to use this? J.Pietschmann

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread Glen Mazza
If he's using the transcoder, he has no other choice (fortunately)--that's the only place where they are supported. Glen --- J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: I've just been running the same test ( examples/fo/advanced/giro.fo ) and received the same

Re: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-20 Thread Glen Mazza
Jay, Thanks for checking and sorry for the delay--Isabel took away my electricity for two days. Like Andreas, I didn't see the hanging you mentioned. Also, your error message was the hyphenation issue I mentioned below--those will occur, which I'm sadly not trained to fix right now--I'm on other

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-14 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I added in a new Batik extension element mapping in our main trunk code--this should help you. It is not Glen, I'm just being curious: did my remarks turn out to be helpful here? (I just want to check to what extent I'm

RE: (Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-14 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just being curious: did my remarks turn out to be helpful here? (I just want to check to what extent I'm beginning to understand the internals of the application...) I was happy to see you going through the source code. Also welcome to

(Jay) RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-13 Thread Glen Mazza
Jay, I added in a new Batik extension element mapping in our main trunk code--this should help you. It is not perfect--I noticed a hyphenation warning during running your sample fo document; also I ran one of the samples in the Batik directory (I embedded gears.svg into an FO document)--it

Re: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Glen Mazza wrote: Thomas, Two concerns on making this change in our production version: 1.) We do not have plans anytime soon for making a new release of maintenance--so, if I made the change, the new pdftranscoder.jar could be based only on a nightly build--is that OK with you? I think that

Re: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-08 Thread Glen Mazza
Thomas, Two concerns on making this change in our production version: 1.) We do not have plans anytime soon for making a new release of maintenance--so, if I made the change, the new pdftranscoder.jar could be based only on a nightly build--is that OK with you? 2.) I checked out xml-batik and

Re: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-07 Thread Jay Chiu
1. This is an alternative way I try to solve the FOP absolute positoned block-container issue. 2. The FOP version is fop-0.20.5 with batik jar and tried with batik version 1.5. 3. As we have sent back and forth the question and answers so many times, can someone doing the SVG for FOP please take

RE: RE: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-07 Thread Glen Mazza
Jay, Please type this up in Bugzilla so we don't forget it. (http://xml.apache.org/fop/bugs.html)--Also include this sample as an attachment to the bug. No time guarantees can be given, however. In the meantime, Thomas, I don't think I can just switch our SVGElementMapping implementation from

Re: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-07 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Hi Glen, So there already is such a constant: batik.extension.svg.BatikExtConstants.BATIK_EXT_NAMESPACE_URI. I shouldn't add this to ExtensibleSVGDOMImplementation as it is exactly that extensible. The set of Namespaces it supports is determined at run time based on the Service Provider

Re: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-09-07 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Jihai Qiu wrote: The CCS engine for the document is set in BridgeContext.initializeDocument(), which is called by org.apache.batik.bridge.GVTBuilder.build(). But it seems there is no way to set CCS engine from FOP classes(such as BatikElement). (I do not want to modify Batik source code). It also

Re: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-03-06 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi All, I am trying to use batik extensions through FOP. I added BatikElementMapping and BatikObj objects into my FOP src and then registered them in the driver class but I am still getting some exceptions. Can anybody help me out ? I am trying to embed the flowText.svg ( provided by

Re: Batik Extension/FOP problem

2003-03-06 Thread Swapan Golla
Yes. I am using the 0.20.5rc2. May be for the batik extensions to work through FOP, I need to tweak some batik code also?? Swapan. --- Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am trying to use batik extensions through FOP. I added BatikElementMapping and BatikObj objects