On 18/07/2012 15:24, Clay Leeds wrote:
Hi Clay,
OT, but I've made some progress on the CMS. I now have dynamic content working
(separate header and sidenav for FOP, Batik XGC).
Thanks for the update. That is good news.
Chris
More relevant comments below...
On Jul 18, 2012, at 5:17 AM,
On 18/07/2012 14:06, mehdi houshmand wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
As we've seen this morning, my ineptitude at even basic bureaucracy
doesn't really qualify me to show a bias to either side, but I'll give
my 2 cents worth since I am a stakeholder in this debate:
On 18 July 2012 13:17, Vincent Hennebert
I know this isn't directly relevant to this tread, but something else to
consider while we're on the subject of JIRA and bug tracking is integration
between SVN and JIRA itself. Having worked a little bit with PDFBox, they
seem to have quite tight integration between the two such that (I think)
Hi Mehdi,
I will continue the hijacking of the commit message . I feel that opening a
new thread might be disturbing and I don't know if the FOP community is
interested. I hope I am helping a little to improve the processes and not
spamming your inbox. I am not familiar with the Apache
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the response, that's been very informative, I think if we
considered SVN/Jenkins integration, it'd make life a lot easier. The more
we can automate, the fewer the mistakes, that's pretty much my only
reasoning, though obviously it'd have to be investigated to come up with a
Hi Alexios,
thanks for you input.
On 18/07/12 01:05, Alexios Giotis wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 13/07/12 22:52, Alexios Giotis wrote:
A change log or release notes can be generated by Jira [1]. For example,
[2] is the release notes for
On 18/07/12 01:14, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alexios Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.comwrote:
The end result is to provide a documentation trail. I initially replied to
this thread because Jira is not (yet) used in FOP and it happens to provide
this feature.
FYI,
On Jul 18, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 18/07/12 01:14, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alexios Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.comwrote:
The end result is to provide a documentation trail. I initially replied to
this thread because Jira is not (yet) used in
As we've seen this morning, my ineptitude at even basic bureaucracy doesn't
really qualify me to show a bias to either side, but I'll give my 2 cents
worth since I am a stakeholder in this debate:
On 18 July 2012 13:17, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip/
Well, the problem is
On 18/07/12 13:46, Alexios Giotis wrote:
On Jul 18, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 18/07/12 01:14, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alexios Giotis
alex.gio...@gmail.comwrote:
The end result is to provide a documentation trail. I initially replied to
OT, but I've made some progress on the CMS. I now have dynamic content working
(separate header and sidenav for FOP, Batik XGC).
More relevant comments below...
On Jul 18, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexios,
thanks for you input.
On 18/07/12
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 18/07/12 13:46, Alexios Giotis wrote:
On Jul 18, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 18/07/12 01:14, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alexios Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.com
On 16/07/2012 14:33, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com mailto:bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm in favour of changing the policy to always open a
Bugzilla/Jira entry for every bug fixed in FOP. However, it
On 13/07/12 22:52, Alexios Giotis wrote:
A change log or release notes can be generated by Jira [1]. For example,
[2] is the release notes for Apache PDFBox 1.7. Bug or issue titles (at
least) tend to be better, if it is known that the change log is generated by
such a system. Glenn wrote
Hi Vincent,
On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 13/07/12 22:52, Alexios Giotis wrote:
A change log or release notes can be generated by Jira [1]. For example,
[2] is the release notes for Apache PDFBox 1.7. Bug or issue titles (at
least) tend to be better, if it is
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alexios Giotis alex.gio...@gmail.comwrote:
The end result is to provide a documentation trail. I initially replied to
this thread because Jira is not (yet) used in FOP and it happens to provide
this feature.
FYI, Alex, if you aren't aware of it, the project
On 13/07/2012 09:05, Pascal Sancho wrote:
Hi,
Hi Pascal,
IMHO, using a bugtracker system to list bugfix or changes is a good idea.
But today, the practice in FOP project is to fill this list directly
in the cited page.
We can adopt a new policy here and have a change/bugfix list using
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
I'm in favour of changing the policy to always open a Bugzilla/Jira entry
for every bug fixed in FOP. However, it won't always be possible to upload
resources to replicate the issue. Whilst we can clean any FO
Hi,
IMHO, using a bugtracker system to list bugfix or changes is a good idea.
But today, the practice in FOP project is to fill this list directly
in the cited page.
We can adopt a new policy here and have a change/bugfix list using
bugtracker facilities.
That could be done when we'll migrate to
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.comwrote:
IMHO, using a bugtracker system to list bugfix or changes is a good idea.
But today, the practice in FOP project is to fill this list directly
in the cited page.
We can adopt a new policy here and have a change/bugfix
I'm ok with that, but all fop team should be convinced...
So debate (if that need to discuss) is open ;-)
2012/7/13 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com
wrote:
IMHO, using a bugtracker system to list bugfix or changes is a good
On 13/07/12 14:07, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.comwrote:
IMHO, using a bugtracker system to list bugfix or changes is a good idea.
But today, the practice in FOP project is to fill this list directly
in the cited page.
We can adopt a
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
We can decide to change that and use a bug tracking system instead, but
in the same time we do that we will have to have in place a new
mechanism to generate the changes [1] page. Also, we will most likely
have to
A change log or release notes can be generated by Jira [1]. For example, [2]
is the release notes for Apache PDFBox 1.7. Bug or issue titles (at least) tend
to be better, if it is known that the change log is generated by such a system.
Glenn wrote very good points. It will help the FOP
Is this addressing a specific bug? If not, then please enter a bug and
update the status to ensure this association for documentation and release
notes tracking purposes.
Also, I notice you left a printf in place below. Is that intentional? If
so, then I would suggest using something other than
On 12/07/12 14:37, Glenn Adams wrote:
Is this addressing a specific bug? If not, then please enter a bug and
update the status to ensure this association for documentation and release
notes tracking purposes.
I added an entry in the status.xml file.
Also, I notice you left a printf in place
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/07/12 14:37, Glenn Adams wrote:
Is this addressing a specific bug? If not, then please enter a bug and
update the status to ensure this association for documentation and
release
notes tracking purposes.
On 12/07/12 14:47, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Vincent Hennebert
vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/07/12 14:37, Glenn Adams wrote:
Is this addressing a specific bug? If not, then please enter a bug and
update the status to ensure this association for documentation
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/07/12 14:47, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/07/12 14:37, Glenn Adams wrote:
Is this addressing a specific bug? If not, then please
On 12/07/12 16:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Hennebert
vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/07/12 14:47, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/07/12 14:37, Glenn Adams wrote:
Is this
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/07/12 16:17, Glenn Adams wrote:
If there is no bug entry in bugzilla, then there is/was no bug. Since
this
is clearly a bug fix, there should be a documentation trail through the
bug
database. So please
31 matches
Mail list logo
