Easy please. Vincent has a preference. Jeremias is OK with it, but he
is not hot about it, so he is not going to do it. Vincent did not add
the new utilities, so he is not going to do it. That leaves Andreas to
do it, or me, or ..., or it remains undone. Fortunately, that would
not create a mess.
On 18.04.2008 19:24:05 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 18.04.2008 16:51:37 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>> On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few comments:
>
> - some time ago I created a BreakUtil
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44619
Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 18.04.2008 16:51:37 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
A few comments:
- some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
I think this class and Ke
On 18.04.2008 16:51:37 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> A few comments:
> >>
> >> - some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
> >> I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in th
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A few comments:
>>
>> - some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
>> I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in the same place.
>> Perhaps we could even merge them into a uniqu
Fixed. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649552&view=rev
On 18.04.2008 16:24:05 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> There’s another problem: the missing glyph message is displayed twice
> for every missing glyph. This isn’t the case with FOP 0.95beta.
>
> Vincent
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Thanks, tha
On 18.04.2008 16:10:30 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
> >> - invalid param usage: use -param
> >> - you must specify the number of copies
> >> - the USAGE m
There’s another problem: the missing glyph message is displayed twice
for every missing glyph. This isn’t the case with FOP 0.95beta.
Vincent
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Thanks, that helped identify the problem. Now fixed:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649477&view=rev
>
> On 18.04.2008 13:18:53
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
>> - invalid param usage: use -param
>> - you must specify the number of copies
>> - the USAGE messages
>
> These are part of the command-line interface which
Thanks, that helped identify the problem. Now fixed:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649477&view=rev
On 18.04.2008 13:18:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Hmm, I cannot reproduce that. The command-line mentions missing fonts to
> > me. I don't expect differences between the
On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
>
> - invalid param usage: use -param
> - you must specify the number of copies
> - the USAGE messages
These are part of the command-line interface which must interface with
System.o
On 18.04.2008 12:48:53 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few comments:
>
> - some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
> I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in the same place.
> Perhaps we could even merge them into a unique KeepsAndBreaksUtil
> class
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hmm, I cannot reproduce that. The command-line mentions missing fonts to
> me. I don't expect differences between the font substitution warning and
> the "auto table" warning.
>
> C:\Dev\FOP\main\trunk-clean>fop -fo helloworld.fo -pdf out.pdf
> 18.04.2008 11:24:13 org.apach
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
- invalid param usage: use -param
- you must specify the number of copies
- value must be a positive integer
- the USAGE messages
And probably others.
> On 18.04.2008 11:28:48 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Hi Jeremias,
>>
>> why don't
Hi,
A few comments:
- some time ago I created a BreakUtil class in the o.a.f.util package.
I think this class and KeepUtil should be put in the same place.
Perhaps we could even merge them into a unique KeepsAndBreaksUtil
class. I don’t really know what the best place would be. I put it in
Hi
I updated my sandbox to include the processing-feedback changes, and
after running 'ant clean', I got the following when running target
resourcegen:
resourcegen:
[mkdir] Created dir: /Developer/javatools/xml-fop/build/codegen-classes
[javac] Compiling 3 source files to /Developer/javato
Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
On 18.04.2008 11:28:48 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> why don't you use the new processing feedback mechanism for the
> notifications we can find in the code below?
>
> Vincent
Jeremias Maerki
Hi Jeremias,
why don't you use the new processing feedback mechanism for the
notifications we can find in the code below?
Vincent
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Thu Apr 17 08:12:23 2008
> New Revision: 649146
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649146&view=rev
> Log:
> Bugzilla #41687:
> Rest
Hmm, I cannot reproduce that. The command-line mentions missing fonts to
me. I don't expect differences between the font substitution warning and
the "auto table" warning.
C:\Dev\FOP\main\trunk-clean>fop -fo helloworld.fo -pdf out.pdf
18.04.2008 11:24:13 org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
Damn, my fault this time. I had some unfinished changes in the
RTF code in the same working copy. Fixed now.
On 17.04.2008 14:27:43 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://g
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 pr
Jeremias,
When I specify an unknown font family in my FO file and launch FOP with
the command line it no longer warns me that the font was substituted
with “any,normal,400”. Is that to be expected?
I get the other warnings (auto table layout unsupported, for example) as
usual, though.
Thanks,
Vin
Interesting. In fact, while svnmerge is (IMO) a wonderful tool for
keeping a temporary branch in sync with the Trunk, its behaviour seems
to be more erratic when it comes to merging back that branch into the
Trunk. Good to know for the future.
Thanks for the details,
Vincent
Jeremias Maerki wrote
24 matches
Mail list logo
