DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17194] New: - LineArea Leader fails in 0.20.5rc2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

On 17.02.2003 17:36:13 Victor Mote wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > Todos, as I see them: > > - Remove all incompatible hyphenation files from CVS which are not clear > > to be ok. > > - Find Apache-compatible hyphenation files. > > I found a generic TeX distribution that came with my Red

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs fonts.xml

jeremias2003/02/19 01:30:52 Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs fonts.xml Log: Added note for applicability to PDF and PS renderers only. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +9 -0 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/fonts.xml Index: fonts.xml =

Positive responses from XML PMC on rotation scheme for project representatives

I've got positive responses from the XML PMC on Keiron's idea of a rotating scheme for project representatives. There will be discussions on [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the near future to adjust the XML charter to today's requirements. What needs to be addressed is the "oversight" factor: Too high a frequ

Re: Hyphenation patterns included in fop-0.20.5rc2

FOP version 0.20.5rc2 contains the following hyphenation files: - en_GB.xml: British English - es.xml: Spanish - fi.xml: Finnish - hu.xml: Hungarian - it.xml: Italian - pl.xml: Polish Christian, I'm most uneasy about hu.xml. It's the only one that IMO doesn't have an explicit statement that the f

Table Border

Hello All, I am very new to FOP and I am using FOP in my Project. I want to create tables with border in my application, I am able to create tables but without borders can any one suugest me a solution to get the borders for table. Thanks in Advance, Venkata Suresh. --

Re: Table Border

Use in the fo:table tag the following things: border-left-color border-left-style border-left-width border-top-color border-top-style border-top-width border-right-color border-right-style border-right-width border-bottom-color border-bottom-style border-bottom-width greetings, Jochen Jochen M

Re: Table Border

Venkata, Just have an example as an extra: Subject: Table Border

Re: Positive responses from XML PMC on rotation scheme for projectrepresentatives

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I've got positive responses from the XML PMC on Keiron's idea of a > rotating scheme for project representatives. There will be discussions > on [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the near future to adjust the XML charter > to today's requirements. What needs to b

Re: ready to go again

On 18.02.2003 18:38:43 Victor Mote wrote: > OK, I am ready to jump in & do some work. Sorry for being out of action for > so long. Hey, no apology required. > The threads that I would like to complete, or at least resolve, > first, are: > > 1. Documentation. The main problem here is the web sit

Re: Hyphenation patterns included in fop-0.20.5rc2

Thanks for the quick response. Can this information be added to the release notes and/or readme? I see that en_GB.xml exists but what's the story on what I would assume would be called en_US.xml (US English hyphenation patterns file)? Does it exist? Is it missing due to licensing issues? Also,

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

>"J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sorry for being unclear and short-spoken, I didn't meant to offend you. Jeez, I was not. I think _I_ was not clear when posting the files. >However, did you really start with an empty file in an editor and typed >in all the pattern strings? >There are Origin

RE: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > I found a generic TeX distribution that came with my Red Hat > (the relevant > > files are installed into /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen). I /think/ > > these are standard "generic" TeX files, which would be subject > to Knuth's > > license, which IMO is Apache-comp

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

On 18.02.2003 22:07:13 J.Pietschmann wrote: > The LPPL'd hyphenation have to be checked thouroughly because > of LPPL 1. Condition 2 does not apply. Condition 7 is fulfilled > by keeping the file under LPPL. 3 is probably trivially ok as > mentioned above. 4, 5 and 6 can be easily checked and cor

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

On 19.02.2003 17:56:27 Victor Mote wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > > I found a generic TeX distribution that came with my Red Hat > > (the relevant > > > files are installed into /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen). I /think/ > > > these are standard "generic" TeX files, which would be sub

RE: Looking for the best location for a barcode library

Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Currently, the project's a one-man show, so I think it doesn't qualify > as a candiate for an Apache (sub-)project. But who knows. That's why I > ask around first. Being a FOP committer I could also add it to FOP but I > think the project isn't exclusively useful in that c

Re: Hyphenation patterns included in fop-0.20.5rc2

On 19.02.2003 16:47:30 Clay Leeds wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. Can this information be added to the > release notes and/or readme? I'll put it on my todo list if nobody does it before I do. > I see that en_GB.xml exists but what's the story on what I would assume > would be called e

RE: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 18.02.2003 22:07:13 J.Pietschmann wrote: > > > The LPPL'd hyphenation have to be checked thouroughly because > > of LPPL 1. Condition 2 does not apply. Condition 7 is fulfilled > > by keeping the file under LPPL. 3 is probably trivially ok as > > mentioned above. 4, 5

RE: ready to go again

Jeremias Maerki wrote: > don't want another lengthy discussion started with my comments above. It > may even be best if you did it your way for now (we need to get the ball > rolling) and we adjusted the code to the Avalon environment as soon as I > have set it up. I'm still trying to get my mind

Looking for the best location for a barcode library

Hi there Before I open a SourceForge project I wanted to ask if there might be interest in a barcode library/framework here at Apache. I started to develop the library two years ago and it has already seen real-life use in two projects with my last employer. I'm in the process of doing a major ref

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageLayoutManager.java RetrieveMarkerLayoutManager.java BlockLayoutManager.java

keiron 2003/02/19 18:47:45 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/area AreaTree.java AreaTreeModel.java PageViewport.java src/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageLayoutManager.java RetrieveMarkerLayoutManager.java Bloc

Long licence

That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I can do it. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17194] - LineArea Leader fails in 0.20.5rc2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Long licence

Jeremias Maerki wrote: That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I can do it. I can help you. Should we change both codebases? -- Oleg Tkachenko Multiconn Technologies, Israel --