Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] After the match is before the match: GSOC 21

Hello, thanks for suggesting a topic! well first we need to see if the GSOC application works well for us and then if there are students applying for it and what topics they like and so on .. but as for a topic suggestion, the integration of scancode is a good suggestion. As for new

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] After the match is before the match: GSOC 21

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 11:13 +, Michael C. Jaeger wrote: > After the match is before the match: GSOC 21 > Location: Microsoft Teams Meeting > Start time: Wednesday, February 17 4:00 AM > End time: Wednesday, February 17 5:00 AM I'm not likely to be able to attend live at that time

Re: [FOSSology] fossology

Hello, I agree, several persons have written to me now (hi, Steve, Matija, ... ) So for every one on the list: there is a number of links coving this as scam as we learned now! But thanks for reaching out! Kind regards, Michael On 13.01.21, 14:44, "fossology@lists.fossology.org on

Re: [FOSSology] fossology

Hi Michael, I hope you are aware that this is just a scamming attempt and the whole purpose it just to make you pay for some non-existent service. More examples and variants of similar scamming attempts:

Re: [FOSSology] fossology

Hello Colton, thank you for reaching out for us. question understood. We will come back to you shortly. Kind regards, Michael > On 13. Jan 2021, at 08:00, colto...@mipo-internet.org.cn wrote: > > Dear CEO or General Manager, > > Please read this letter carefully since this is an urgent case.

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] New YouTube video - FOSSology Installation from Source

I think it’s a great idea to do this kind of video. I’ll try and review in the coming week because I think FOSSology is kind of hard to install. Also, there is lots of duplicated , out of date, and confusing documentation around installation which I think can be helped with explanatory video.

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

(prasadiy); Shiv Majji (smajji); Ted Gauthier (tedg); fossol...@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result *** THIS IS AN EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please do not reply, click on any links, or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know that the content is safe. *** Thanks

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

fossology.org On Behalf > Of Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) via lists.fossology.org > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 8:42 AM > To: fossol...@fossology.org; Mishra, Gaurav (CT RDA SSI ISF-IN) > > Cc: Prasad Iyer (prasadiy) ; Shiv Majji (smajji) > ; Ted Gauthier (tedg) > Su

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result

) Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology scan result Hello Fossology Team, Can you let me know if the component name identification is possible along with the discovered license ? -Prasaath From: Prasaath Ramasamy (prasaara) Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:37 PM To: fossol...@fossology.org

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

Jerozolimskie 160, 02-326 Warszawa http://www.orange.pl -Original Message- From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de] Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 11:52 PM To: Jeremiah C. Foster Cc: Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt; fossol...@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 23:52 +0200, Michael C. Jaeger wrote: > Hi, > > right now the idea is to have RAG per FOSSology server instance, > meaning how the administrator of an instance wants to set it to. Seems flexible. > However, even this might be still inflexible, because "red" licenses > or

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

Hi, right now the idea is to have RAG per FOSSology server instance, meaning how the administrator of an instance wants to set it to. However, even this might be still inflexible, because "red" licenses or obligations are even not a good category for an entire organisation, but maybe per

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 10:51 +, Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt via lists.fossology.org wrote: Hello All Have you ever thought about improving functionality of Fossology Obligation feature Currently Fossology 3.8.0 allows to configure obligations on a specific conditions and provides a

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology fails on unpacking

Die 1. 04. 20 et hora 22:58 Michael C. Jaeger scripsit: > I think currently, the workaround is to remove these files from > your upload before uploading, sorry. Got it. Thank you both. I’ll try to do that then :) cheers & stay in good health! Matija -- gsm:tel:+386.41.849.552 www:

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology fails on unpacking

Hi Matija, I don't know for certain if this is the problem you're seeing, but I see some files in your log with .eot and .otf extensions. There is a known problem with Fossology in that it fails to correctly unpack or handle .eot and .otf files. See:

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

...@fossology.org Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result Greetings, PFA, Kindly assist us why Software heritage jobs always got failed. Looking for your reply to know about. 2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: JOB[61

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

Floor, Shivaji Garden 1/24, Mount Poonamallee Road, Ramapuram Chennai 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162 sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com www.unimoni.com/gbs -Original Message- From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de] Sent: 13 March 2020 13:52 To: su

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

nnai 600 089, Tamil Nadu, India M: +91 9940725488| P: +91 44 61212162 | Ext: 2162 sundaramoorth...@unimoni.com www.unimoni.com/gbs -Original Message- From: Michael C. Jaeger [mailto:m...@mcj.de] Sent: 17 March 2020 15:44 To: sundaramoorthi p Cc: fossol...@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSo

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result Hello, There could be a number of things happened to your fossology setup. Form the screenshot shot it looks like the "scheduler" is not processing your jobs. The scheduler is a central component whi

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

2020-03-17 07:27:48 softwareHeritage [0] :: > JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: agent failed with error code 1 > 2020-03-17 07:27:49 softwareHeritage [0] :: > JOB[61].softwareHeritage[3213.localhost]: agent failed, code: 0 > > Thanks & Regards > Sundaramoorthi Palanivel >

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Local set up - Awaiting for scanned files result

Hello, There could be a number of things happened to your fossology setup. Form the screenshot shot it looks like the "scheduler" is not processing your jobs. The scheduler is a central component which coordinates the analysis tasks on an upload. Moreover I am seeing that you reach fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology copyright agent failing (partially)

Hello, how did you install it? I think ct_pk should not be there but some older code is expecting it: https://github.com/fossology/fossology/pull/1201 (apparently it is also not in the DB anymore, but suspecting some older code is still running) Kind regards, Michael > On 2. Oct 2019, at

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

ce? Thanks in advance and sorry for this avalance of questions, Hans-Joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael C. Jaeger Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. September 2019 16:11 An: Daniels, Hans-Joachim Cc: fossol...@fossology.org Betreff: Re: [FOSSology

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

for this avalance of questions, Hans-Joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael C. Jaeger Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. September 2019 16:11 An: Daniels, Hans-Joachim Cc: fossol...@fossology.org Betreff: Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions? Hello, but you need to ch

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology for custom Linux distributions?

Hello, I think it is safe to say that FOSSology was designed for working with entire distros from the beginning on. (Dan?) but you need to change your postgresql setup. The main thing that you need to keep in mind is that postgresql comes with settings (after installation via apt or what ever

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Info Rqrd:- Installation Process || Setup Process for Users || Requirements

Hi, right and adding to the other points Working process of fossology? -> https://www.fossology.org/get-started/basic-workflow/ Installation process? -> https://github.com/fossology/fossology How to configure for license management? -> Dan's answer How to add any license to fossology web

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Info Rqrd:- Installation Process || Setup Process for Users || Requirements

Hi Shreemant, On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 Shreemant Kumar wrote: > We are requiring a license management tool and we have found fossology > that can possible to manage the license. Actually, we need to manage > Adobe, Windows and other licenses through the fossology but we are > unable to

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology installation from source - question?

Hello, if there is no special reason for using 340-rc2, why not using 340? Maybe it is indeed an Apache conf issue, you should see a conf file in /etc/apache/sites-enabled (or a link to this)- is it there? Maybe the copying of the conf file is broken, you could find a conf file at

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology report

Hi, You way want to have a look at the two projects below, aiming at driving a Fossology instance (the second being inspired by the first). Not sure it fills exactly your need, we is probably worth a look. - https://gitlab.com/toganlabs/fossup - https://github.com/fossology/fossdriver Nico

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology offline

Hello, you could do an export of SPDX (RDF-XML!) on one fossology server of an analysed package and import this again using the "Report Import" functionality for this file on another fossology sever. But that is upload-wise, I am not sure if this is what you have in mind? Kind regards,

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.2

Dne četrtek, 22. februar 2018 ob 07:59:46 CET je Michael C. Jaeger napisal(a): > -> but how about changing the output to ODF, would these proprietary Word > processors run OK with *.odt (?) files? The last time I checked – and that was quite some years ago – MS Office officially had ODF

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.2

Hi, no problem. just a few thoughts: * LibreOffice/OO can open these files (... this is the "for" for ...) * Actually this is a consensus because some organizations / persons run primarily proprietary Word processors on primarily proprietary OSes which understand the *.docx as well. -> but

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology

Hello, I am sorry to hear that, some description is here: https://github.com/fossology/fossology/blob/master/README.md otherwise, could you pls. be more specific what fails (like which docker version, machine specs, error message

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology training question

Hello, I am glad to read there is interest for this. We do not have the certification of fossology skills ready, but there are 1-day trainings co-located at some events of the Linux Foundation. The next 1-day training offered as colocated event at the Open Source Summit Europe 2017 can be

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

Michael and the FOSSology team, Congratulations and great job on the 3.1.0 release! Dan Stangel Hewlett Packard Enterprise Open Source Program Office -Original Message- From: fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of Jaeger,

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

Great, well done. Thank you very much Michael, Maximilian, Shaheem, Anupam, and all others Ciao Oliver -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] Im Auftrag von Jaeger, Michael C. Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. April 2017

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Release 3.1.0

Dear Michael and contributors THANK YOU! -roger Sent from my phone > On 25 Apr 2017, at 21:50, Jaeger, Michael C. > wrote: > > Hi, > > maybe you have seen it already: > > https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases > > The FOSSology development

Re: [FOSSology] fossology reading from a repo (collection of git repositiries)

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:19 PM, David Van Beveren wrote: > I am interested in extending fossology to load a large source file tree > via the ‘repo’ command. Here is a blurb on repo from source.android.com: > (there Is no Linux manpage): > > > > *Repo* is a repository

Re: [FOSSology] fossology on ubuntu 14.04

You may need to add your "user" to the group "fossy" - similar to: 1. Ensure ubuntu is a member of fossy group sudo usermod -a -G fossy ubuntu Paul... From: ag...@idirect.net At: 09/09/16 07:59:38 To: fossol...@fossology.org Subject: Re:[FOSSology] fossology on ubuntu

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology and SPDX in AUTOSAR

Hi Heinz, [Oliver] thank you for contacting us. I am working for the AUTOSAR association as one of the FOSS responsibles. I am investigating about Fossology and SPDX. In that context I would like to get into contact with you. •We want to use e.g. Fossology as the tool for analyzing

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology and SPDX in AUTOSAR

Greetings Heinz, On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:57 AM, wrote: > Dear Sir or Madam, > > > > I am working for the AUTOSAR association as one of the FOSS responsibles. > I am investigating about Fossology and SPDX. In that context I would like > to get into contact with you. >

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Fossology looks dead...

Hello, actually, I 1) call https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu 2) login using testuser/test 3) See Browse -> "Uploads in Software Repository" -> no exception at all, just a list of 15 items. either the error is fixed or you did something additional not mentioned or not understood by me? Kind

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Fossology looks dead...

ps://github.com/fossology/fossology/wiki and https://github.com/fossology/fossology The mail list(s) are very quiet though :) Paul... From: tim.b...@sonymobile.com<mailto:tim.b...@sonymobile.com> At: 15-Mar-2016 14:59:51 To: fossol...@fossology.org<mailto:fossol...@fossology.org> Subject

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

at the place of the subject: issue or pull request … kind regards, Michael From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of Jeremiah Foster Sent: Donnerstag, 17. März 2016 14:38 To: fossol...@fossology.org Cc: fossology-de...@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Fossology

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

Back up: https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu User: testuser Pass: test Matt On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Matt Germonprez wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Taking a look at the UNOmaha instance right now. > > Matt > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Tim Bird

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology looks dead...

gh :) Paul... From: tim.b...@sonymobile.com At: 15-Mar-2016 14:59:51 To: fossol...@fossology.org Subject: Re:[FOSSology] Fossology looks dead... I decided to take a look at Fossology, and my first impression was somewhat tarnished by the set of links I attempted to use. Fossology looked like a de

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Hello Vincent, I can install non fosology packages e.g. I tried to install package, rpld and I was able to install it Then I tried to install package, rpm but resulted into following error, $sudo apt-get install rpm Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Hi Amol, Seems your system cannot install some Ubuntu packages, can you try to install some non fossology packages to see what happened? For example: sudo apt-get install rpm Vincent From: Tupe, Amol (Amol) [mailto:tu...@avaya.com] Sent: 2015年5月12日 21:40 To: Ma, Dong (Vincent, Open Source

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Single server install on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

Hi Amol, Your step use sudo apt-get install fossology is for single server installation, it will install all fossology staff. Fossology needed some dependencies packages for installation, you must install it first, if your package repo configure correct, it will be installed automate by this

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Foundation discussion

Hello Robert, Monday 6:00CET if I translate correctly is something I can also do. Not sure I'm the type of people important in that call, but if there is a discussion around SW production and build, then I may be able to help a bit. Including on the build service part. I'm adding Docker container

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Future direction

Hi Mike, Thanks for this information. What the project needs is: 1) A public FOSSology instance (if Matt at UNO wants to move this off their server). 2) A package build/test infrastructure. We build packages for several distros and distro versions, and currently use VM’s at HP to test them.

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology Volunteer?

Hi Ryan, I’ll contact you off list. Thanks for volunteering. Bob Gobeille On Mar 22, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Arnold, Ryan rarn...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote: Good morning, My name is Ryan Arnold, and I am a Software Quality Analyst (project management) on Qualcomm’s Software Analysis and Scan

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa, Please apply this patch https://github.com/fossology/fossology/commit/77c51dceb51991252e995a11a204bda3ab4aec92#diff-8a4d83510c38b443084833a2de2e6aaa to your /usr/{local}/share/fossology/lib/php/common-auth.php in 2.6.1 fossology, then test again. Hope it is helpful. -Larry

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

Hello Lary, I was in root login when I execute fossology commands, and I missed placing .fossology.rc in /root. Now it works without this patch. One more issue is, if I am in some user login say /home/wipro and I execute fossology commands, I get a message “ You must be in group “fossy””. Why

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

​Hello Lary, Thanks for the reply. No, the issue is still the same. Best regards Kotrappa. From: Shi, Yao-Bin (Larry, GBU-HPSW, Cloud and OS) yao-bin@hp.com Sent: 16 March 2015 09:17 To: Kotrappa DeverShetty (WT01 - Manufacturing Hi Tech); Gobeille,

Re: [FOSSology] fossology commands does not recognize .fossology.rc file with user id/pwd of fossology

Hi Kotrappa, We are sorry for that, please try the blow again: user=fossy password=fossy will fix soon. -Larry From: fossology [mailto:fossology-boun...@lists.fossology.org] On Behalf Of kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:34 PM To: Gobeille, Robert Cc:

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 84, Issue 14

Hi Raino, Can you please check the owner for the spdx tables that are created in the fossology database. The owner should be fossy. Also, can you please send me the log file for more info. Thanks, Venkata K Penmatsa, Open Communities Research Lab, University of Nebraska at Omaha. On Nov 25, 2014

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

Hi all, change is always difficult and my first feeling was of course a worry how this good work can continue. But on the other hand this is a very natural move. When I have given presentations about FOSSology one question has been asked several times - what is the benefit for HP. Now it

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

I think what we need is a list of pro's and con's to both. Does Linux Foundation charge? Software Conservancy requests 10% of contributions. I don't have a strong opinion either way, just a small opinion. I like the Linux Foundation because it's fairly aligned with much of what Freescale is

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

Hi Richard, First I’ll go over why I would like FOSSology to be under a foundation. In a nutshell I want to do everything I can to make FOSSology self sustaining. Then I’ll start a comparison between the Linux Foundation and the Software Freedom Conservancy. I hope others help me fill this

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

Hi All, From the this discussion, I pay more attention to this comment from Oliver below, because I have the same feeling with Oliver, from my perspective, the primary thing we should consider is continue this tool after the change. That is the most important metric. The LinuxFoundation is a

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

Sorry for showing up late to the party. Whey you say, 'looking for a home', what kind of home are you looking for? A place to host git repos or more? Why are you looking at 'non-profits'. Is it a mechanism for contributions or something more? And what does the choice of home mean to

Re: [FOSSology] [FOSSology-devel] Conservancy as a possible home for Fossology

Gobeille, Robert wrote a few minutes ago: I’ll share with everyone that Conservancy was my personal choice for a foundation home [for FOSSology]. I encourage any truly open source project in need of a foundation home to consider Conservancy. Thank you. That means a lot to us at Conservancy,

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology 2.6.1 Error on Upload File

wget errors are usually caused by permission or proxy problems. Was this the complete error message? There should have been additional information above that line. On Oct 30, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Valerie Duncan valerie.duncan.c...@statefarm.com wrote: I have just install Fossology 2.6.1

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology 2.6.1 Error on Upload File

I should have mentioned to please check your repository permissions. If you click on Admin Dashboard, it will show you the repository path. User and group fossy should have read/write access. Also, your web server (www, www-data, whatever rhel uses) should be in the fossy group. On Oct

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 83, Issue 5

) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:55:41 +0100 From: Klaus Gmeinwieser klaus.gmeinwie...@oce.com To: Venkata Krishna Penmatsa vpenma...@unomaha.edu Cc: fossology@lists.fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 83, Issue 3 Message-ID

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18

Hi Venkata, Thanks for the information. I have one more query. I think following command sends the local file ( --post-file =../time-1.7.tar) to webserver, waits for file to be scanned and gets .spdx results from the webserver. Do we have an option where a big file is already uploaded to

Re: [FOSSology] fossology Digest, Vol 75, Issue 18

Hi Kotrappa, The reason is extracted license(the licenses not been defined in SPDX license list) is indexed as LicenseRef- in full spdx document. In your case, you can find No_license_found license is defined as LicenseRef-3 in ln.347-349@time-1.7_localhost.spdx. Thanks, Venkata K Penmatsa Open

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology+SPDX on windows?

Hi Kotrappa, At UNO, we have no current plans for the Windows environment. Regards, Matt On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:15 AM, kotrappa.devershe...@wipro.com wrote: Hi Bob, Matt, Do you have plans to support FOSSology tool +SPDX on Windows? Currently I understand FOSSology is available only

Re: [FOSSology] fossology post

From: SunChul Yoon ys482602...@gmail.com Subject: Cannot view the analysis result. Date: August 27, 2013 1:56:41 AM MDT To: fossol...@fossology.org Dear all, I'm SW test engineer, and I have to check Open Source. So, I install Fossology, and run. But, I cannot view the result.

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology access for Open Source Systems

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Stangel, Dan dan.stan...@hp.com wrote: I think I understand now. Several years ago, we had planned to run a FOSSology repository at OSUOSL, and did make several references to it in presentations. Since then, HP made an outright donation of the cluster

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology + Antelink Reporter

-Original Message- From: Gobeille, Robert bob.gobei...@hp.com Date: Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2012 22:50 To: Deveaud, Marion marion.deve...@siemens.com Cc: fossol...@fossology.org fossol...@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology + Antelink Reporter Hello Marion, Right now we

Re: [FOSSology] fossology 2.0 install on RHEL 6

I hit send a bit too quickly. I meant to add that on rpm systems the packages are p7zip and p7zip-plugins. On debian/ubuntu systems they are p7zip and p7zip-full Bob On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Bob Gobeille wrote: Hi Leslie, I don't know of any package called P8zip. I think you mean

Re: [FOSSology] fossology 2.0

Will fossology 2.0 install on RedHat 5.8? I'm having a difficult time finding several of the dependency packages needed specifically (p8zip and file-libs). Please let me know. Thanks, Leslie D. Haynes Lockheed Martin MS2 Telephone (856) 359-1421 Email: leslie.d.hay...@lmco.com

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology redirects

Thank you Martin! -Original Message- From: Michlmayr, Martin Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:14 AM To: Laser, Mary Subject: FOSSology redirects Hi Mary, I put in the following FOSSology redirects after checking the error log for common requests for the old web page. Let me