At 07:11 +1200 13/5/13, Alan T Litchfield wrote:
>These are resellers as in, computer shops selling boxes and stuff? You know,
>retail channel?
Not shops as such: my understanding is that they sell Adobe products and also
training. I have dealt with two recently: Certitec and Phoenix Software.
Adobe introduces subscription-based licensing. So many of its users find it
an outstanding value that over time, most of them license software by
subscription. Adobe is rewarded for being innovative and Adobe serves its
customers better. Everybody wins.
Adobe ends its relationship with resellers o
Old versions of FrameMaker do what FrameMaker used to do as well as
ever. I'd really like to get my hands on a copy of FrameMaker 8.
That whole model seems outdated to me. I'd like to switch to Confluence.
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Alan T Litchfield wrote:
> Time for a robust system that
One benefit of the subscription model is that a company can focus 100%
on the current and next releases. That should significantly reduce
support costs, eliminates the cost of providing and distributing patch
releases for old versions, and reduces various other costs due to
reduced complexity.
On
That's some interesting points and some of them are probably partially
true. What you're saying basically is that Adobe blames its customers for
its relative low profit margins and share price. If only we were more
rational and obedient, Adobe would be better off.
You're side of the mark about res
Hi Jeremy
Did you consider expanding LaTeX?
A fully-featured reliable wysiwyg interface for LaTeX could be a strong
unstructured FM alternative.
It's years since I used LaTeX much but I found it pretty good when I did. Not
easy, but good.
Cheers
Rebecca
>>> "Jeremy H. Griffith" 12/05/13
Craig Ede wrote:
> Your point about ownership is well taken. However, having a disk does mean
> that
> you have access to a given software package you can count on (and not some
> changing version of it). Also, given that license, they cannot revoke your
> ability of
> use the software in that
Another option is to expand OpenOffice,
which is also pretty good, but need more single-sourcing
capabilities.
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Technical Writer
052-763-7133
On 13-May-13 1:38 AM, rebecca officer wrote:
Hi Jeremy
At the risk of sounding all Pollyanna, perhaps what Adobe is doing is actually
good for the tech writing community. Perhaps it WILL inspire people to create
other choices/other competition.
At least it is prompting the conversation.
Nadine
--- On Sat, 5/11/13, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> Fro
2013-05-13-01T13:00Z
There's that death knell again . . ..
Dave Stamm
Information Engineer
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Steve Rickaby
Sent: 2013-05-09-Thursday 12:38
To: framers@lists.frameusers.
On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:38:05 +1200, "rebecca officer"
> wrote:
>Did you consider expanding LaTeX?
Not really. There's a well-established community
around it, and lacking any familiarity with it, we
didn't think we could do it much good.
>A fully-featured reliable wysiwyg interface for LaTeX
>c
I have always had the best luck with the Single range indicator...
-MattMatt R. Sullivan co-author Publishing Fundamentals: Unstructured FrameMaker 11 P: 714.798.7596 | C: 714.585.2335 | m...@mattrsullivan.com @mattrsullivan LinkedIn facebook mattrsullivan.com
On May 9, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Gay Also
2013-05-13-01T15:15Z
I, too, am interested in addition to Alan Litchfield, Syed Hosain, et
al.
Dave Stamm
Information Engineer
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy H.
Griffith
Sent: 2013-05-11-Sat
Here is my suggestion on where to start. I would like a light-weight editor
where the user could apply styles, insert tables, images, etc. The styles
would be mapped to a schema so that the user could output XML. Then a full
copy of FrameMaker could be used as "print engine". You would set up a
str
I'm one who's stayed with FM8 and become increasingly happy about that
decision as I've watched the issues with the new interface accumulate. I'd
like to keep using it as long as possible or until Jeremy's project comes to
fruition. :)
However, I'm a little concerned about Win8. FM8 is five years
On Mon, 13 May 2013 08:15:19 -0700, wrote:
>I, too, am interested in addition to Alan Litchfield, Syed Hosain, et
>al.
I've had several off-list replies as well. I think
you hit a nerve there, Nadine!
So I've put the five-year-old draft spec for Omni 2
on the Mif2Go Web site:
http://mif2go.c
On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:23:49 -0700, Lea Rush wrote:
>I'm one who's stayed with FM8 and become increasingly happy about that
>decision as I've watched the issues with the new interface accumulate. I'd
>like to keep using it as long as possible or until Jeremy's project comes to
>fruition. :)
Me t
2013-05-13-01T19:50Z
"Everybody wins . . .." as far as Adobe Systems Incorporated and some
others might perceive it. From my perspective - and, perhaps, my
employer's perspective - this will _not_ be a "win" for us.
Perhaps Adobe has forgotten that we, the customers, also must make
busines
>“That's how capitalism is supposed to work.”
I don't mean to nitpick, but is that capitalism or free market?
*steps back out of Dave's swing range*
=D
Nadine
___
You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.
Send list messag
Thanks. Those are the corporate resellers I was referring to previously.
The retail reseller channel does not exist anymore. It was that channel
I referred to when I said that they are too expensive to maintain and
why Adobe has gone direct to the market.
The added value is worked out in terms
2013-05-13-01T20:20Z
Nadine -
Nadine, I certainly wouldn't swing the bat if you were within range. On the
other hand, having served in the US Army Infantry, I'd call it "bursting
radius."
Well, if you'll accept an American source, please see
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
Now, Dave, that's not what Google told me when I did a 2 second search on
"capitalism vs free market".
*figuratively checks to make sure the figurative pin is back in the figurative
grenade, then goes back to earning money to support her smart assery*
Nadine
> Nadine -
>
> Nadine, I certain
Hi, all-
Is anyone else running Frame 11 on a MacBook Pro? If so, how did you get it to
install? I am having trouble. I used to run Frame 7 on my old MacBook, so know
it has worked in the past. I was able to download the trial version and have
Parallels running. However when I install, it gets
I am running Frame on a MacBook Pro, Win XP in VMware Fusion. I used
to have Parallels as my emulator, but encountered the same issue you
are experiencing.
Tori Muir
tm...@spot-on-creative.com | 650.430.8674
www.spot-on-creative.com
On 5/13/13 1:46 PM, Kristy N
I run FM10 on a MBP with VirtualBox and Windows 7 installed on Bootcamp.
I boot into Windows using VB. Runs fine.
Of course, I think 10 has different registration procedures to 11.
Alan
On 14/05/13 8:46 AM, Kristy Nolan wrote:
Hi, all-
Is anyone else running Frame 11 on a MacBook Pro? If so,
Hi Kristy,
Windows XP sounds really old.
I run Parallels with Windows 7 on my MacBook Pro and I loaded Frame 10 without
problems.
I would start with an upgrade to Windows 7.
Daniel
On May 13, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Kristy Nolan wrote:
> Hi, all-
>
> Is anyone else running Frame 11 on a MacBook Pr
What browser are you using to download it? You probably should use Firefox from
within the Windows virtual machine - I think Adobe is using 7Zip to compress
the files, so under WinXP you'll need to install that to unzip it (IIRC).
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun
MB Air, vmware Fusion, Win7, runs like a champ!
-MattMatt R. Sullivan co-author Publishing Fundamentals: Unstructured FrameMaker 11 P: 714.798.7596 | C: 714.585.2335 | m...@mattrsullivan.com @mattrsullivan LinkedIn facebook mattrsullivan.com
On May 13, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Daniel Doornbos
> The purpose of business is to make money. The purpose of business is _not_
> to produce a valuable good or to deliver a worthwhile service. The purpose
> of business is to _make_money_.
I'd go beyond the above a little bit more. :) In my blog on this topic (at this
link: http://www.aeris.co
Yes! It is one of the reasons I am now looking at them as a possible tool for
my work - will be starting an evaluation in a few weeks.
However, at first blush, the cost (both to change and to maintain) appears to
be very high and thus one negative so far.
Z
-Original Message-
From: Gil
Hi Steve,
These are resellers as in, computer shops selling boxes and stuff? You
know, retail channel?
Thanks
Alan
On 12/05/13 11:09 PM, Steve Rickaby wrote:
> At 16:42 +1200 12/5/13, Alan T Litchfield wrote:
>
>> Resellers are expensive to support and no longer bring real value to the
>> prod
At 07:11 +1200 13/5/13, Alan T Litchfield wrote:
>These are resellers as in, computer shops selling boxes and stuff? You know,
>retail channel?
Not shops as such: my understanding is that they sell Adobe products and also
training. I have dealt with two recently: Certitec and Phoenix Software.
mediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender has the
authority to issue and specifically states them to
be the views of Allied Telesis Labs.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/c0ac896e/attachment.html>
Craig Ede wrote:
> Your point about ownership is well taken. However, having a disk does mean
> that
> you have access to a given software package you can count on (and not some
> changing version of it). Also, given that license, they cannot revoke your
> ability of
> use the software in that
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/8c81afc7/attachment.html>
At the risk of sounding all Pollyanna, perhaps what Adobe is doing is actually
good for the tech writing community. Perhaps it WILL inspire people to create
other choices/other competition.
At least it is prompting the conversation.
Nadine
--- On Sat, 5/11/13, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> Fro
2013-05-13-01T13:00Z
There's that death knell again?.?.?..
Dave Stamm
Information Engineer
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Steve Rickaby
Sent: 2013-05-09-Thursday 12:38
To: framers at lists.frame
On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:38:05 +1200, "rebecca officer"
> wrote:
>Did you consider expanding LaTeX?
Not really. There's a well-established community
around it, and lacking any familiarity with it, we
didn't think we could do it much good.
>A fully-featured reliable wysiwyg interface for LaTeX
>c
PM, Gay Alson wrote:
> l glitch where the last page would revert to portrait but if I put
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/f9d01ee1/attachment.html>
--
2013-05-13-01T15:15Z
I, too, am interested in addition to Alan Litchfield, Syed Hosain, et
al.
Dave Stamm
Information Engineer
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy H.
Griffith
Sent: 2013-05-11-
Here is my suggestion on where to start. I would like a light-weight editor
where the user could apply styles, insert tables, images, etc. The styles
would be mapped to a schema so that the user could output XML. Then a full
copy of FrameMaker could be used as "print engine". You would set up a
str
I'm one who's stayed with FM8 and become increasingly happy about that
decision as I've watched the issues with the new interface accumulate. I'd
like to keep using it as long as possible or until Jeremy's project comes to
fruition. :)
However, I'm a little concerned about Win8. FM8 is five years
On Mon, 13 May 2013 08:15:19 -0700, wrote:
>I, too, am interested in addition to Alan Litchfield, Syed Hosain, et
>al.
I've had several off-list replies as well. I think
you hit a nerve there, Nadine!
So I've put the five-year-old draft spec for Omni 2
on the Mif2Go Web site:
http://mif2go.c
On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:23:49 -0700, Lea Rush wrote:
>I'm one who's stayed with FM8 and become increasingly happy about that
>decision as I've watched the issues with the new interface accumulate. I'd
>like to keep using it as long as possible or until Jeremy's project comes to
>fruition. :)
Me t
Have you ever been turned down for a project request that you thought was
not only reasonable but vital? If so, the issue might be in how you
presented it.?
?
Join us for a live webinar May 30, 8am Pac, 11am Eastern
Sign up here: http://bit.ly/13V5s8F
As practicing professionals in any arena, w
. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
--
Steve Johnson, dr_gonzo at pobox.com <mailto:dr_gonzo at pobox.com>
--
AlphaByte
PO Box 1941, Auckland
http://www.alphabyte.co.nz
--
Steve Johnson, dr_gonzo at pobox.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/0716ad5b/attachment.html>
>?That's how capitalism is supposed to work.?
I don't mean to nitpick, but is that capitalism or free market?
*steps back out of Dave's swing range*
=D
Nadine
2013-05-13-01T20:20Z
Nadine -
Nadine, I certainly wouldn't swing the bat if you were within range. On the
other hand, having served in the US Army Infantry, I'd call it "bursting
radius."
Well, if you'll accept an American source, please see
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
Now, Dave, that's not what Google told me when I did a 2 second search on
"capitalism vs free market".
*figuratively checks to make sure the figurative pin is back in the figurative
grenade, then goes back to earning money to support her smart assery*
Nadine
?
> Nadine -
>
> Nadine, I certain
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/675bceeb/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment
HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/102bc66d/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: STC-Logo-Fellow-vert.png
Type: image/png
Size: 26019 bytes
Desc: not avai
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/a02eaf4a/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12516 bytes
Desc: not availab
stions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/1c2a39ba/attachment.html>
ubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/c667cde8/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12516 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/
a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/matt%40mattrsullivan.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and
> The purpose of business is to make money. The purpose of business is _not_
> to produce a valuable good or to deliver a worthwhile service. The purpose
> of business is to _make_money_.
I'd go beyond the above a little bit more. :) In my blog on this topic (at this
link: http://www.aeris.co
Yes! It is one of the reasons I am now looking at them as a possible tool for
my work - will be starting an evaluation in a few weeks.
However, at first blush, the cost (both to change and to maintain) appears to
be very high and thus one negative so far.
Z
-Original Message-
From: Gil
ttachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/51559f44/attachment.html>
Craig,
How do you download the help as a PDF?
-Gillian
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Craig Ede
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:25 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: FW: FM10 help bro
Isn't that what MadCap tried to do?
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces at
lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Syed Zaeem Hosain (syed.hos...@aeris.net)
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 3:06 PM
To: Writer; craigede at hotmail.com; framers at
I don't think MS's new can't-call-it-Metro UI has gotten any traction
in corporate environments. If they don't want Windows 8 to be a bigger
flop than Vista, compatibility is essential.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Lea Rush wrote:
> I'm one who's stayed with FM8 and become increasingly happy
FrameMaker replacement. Anything
> more complex may be too
ambitious and not get too far.
>
> Rick Quatro
> Carmen Publishing
Inc.
> 585-283-5045
> rick at frameexpert.com
------ next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/7821ef80/attachment.html>
r more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/34db3c83/attachment.html>
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/frees1%40comcast.net
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>
--
*Frank Rees*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/a9178476/attachment.html>
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Harro de Jong
wrote:
> The FM9 license states that ' you acknowledge that any obligation Adobe may
> have to support the previous version(s) may end upon the availability of the
> upgrade or update.' IANAL, but to me that implies they can turn off your
> license
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Steve Johnson wrote:
> ... you can't buy old versions of anything from anybody ever ...
Maybe licensed resellers have to return all old software when a new
version is released, but the FrameMaker 10 license allows you to sell
your rights:
"You may ... permanently
Customers value a business based on the goods or services it provides,
not on how much money it makes for its stockholders. Adobe hasn't come
up with anything new I thought was worth paying for since 2002.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:19 PM, wrote:
> The purpose of business is to make money. The p
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/afee43b9/attachment.html>
Windows XP SP3?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kristy Nolan wrote:
>
> Is anyone else running Frame 11 on a MacBook Pro? If so, how did you get it
> to install? I am having trouble. I used to run Frame 7 on my old MacBook, so
> know it has worked in the past. I was able to download the trial
tation Architect
*e* john.sgammato at actifio.com
*w* +1-(508) 927-2083
*Recover anything instantly for up to 90% less than you're paying now.*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/143dd535/attachment.html>
ubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/0e14fb5a/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12516 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/
for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/0c458a72/attachment.html>
m
> or visit
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/mikeyshine%40gmail.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130513/bb089b7b/attachment.html>
73 matches
Mail list logo