Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread Jason Evans
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 01:04:07PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: I have no argument about the keyboard probes. I just want to add that in the case of the Belkin OmniView, it should be noted that Belkin shipped a bunch of them with a couple of EPROM chips swapped accidentally. There's a page

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread John Polstra
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 01:04:07PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: I just want to add that in the case of the Belkin OmniView, it should be noted that Belkin shipped a bunch of them with a couple of EPROM chips swapped

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread Jason Evans
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 02:35:22PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: Maybe they swapped the labels on the chips too. :-) Well, it apparently doesn't fry anything to have the chips reversed, so maybe I should try swapping them just to make sure. =) Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread Mike Burgett
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:16:47 -0600, Nate Williams wrote: :Finally, most keyboard/mouse/monitor switches don't work with :FreeBSD; This is actually not true. I'd doubt that you've even tried many of them. Boy, you are on one about me... I have tried 5 switches. At ClickArray,

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Jim Bryant
I said I'd drop it, but apparently there are people that don't understand the dinosaur mentality of certain organizations such as DOD, DISA/DECC, OSD, DARPA, USA, USN, USAF, and USMC. If it's not in the base setup, on a production box, you can't use it. Everything must be kept in it's

Re: Buildworld pain in -current

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:16:28PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: I recently had a chance to buildworld on new -stable and -current machines with similar spec'd HW.. The -current build was _slow_ - 10756.71 real 2026.00 user 7814.64 sys vs -stable - 2332.03 real

Re: Buildworld pain in -current

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:16:28PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: I recently had a chance to buildworld on new -stable and -current machines with similar spec'd HW.. The -current build was _slow_ - 10756.71 real 2026.00 user 7814.64 sys vs -stable - 2332.03 real

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:38:56PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: Yes the sun packages installs into /bin: ticso@cicely22 uname -a SunOS cicely22 5.8 Generic_108528-01 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCclassic ticso@cicely22 which bash /bin/bash ticso@cicely22 file /bin/bash /bin/bash: ELF 32-bit MSB

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Nate Williams
# Bash has a license which precludes its inclusion as part # of the base system. [Not that I favor more shells on the root file system, but anyway:] What about gcc and grep? Does the license differ or are these not regarded being part of the base system? We would get rid of them

Re: Anyone working on missing sysv* ipc functionality

2001-08-12 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: ... my guess is that you are Lets see... Attached is a first shot to get /compat/linux/usr/bin/ipcs -s working. I extended sem.h for SEM_STAT and gave it a special handling in __semctl() to accept a index number. Please review and commmit if

2nd data point for keyboard probes (was Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach)

2001-08-12 Thread Sean Chittenden
I've seen the 'have to be on the machine while booting' behavior using a Belkin Omniview Pro switch, which oddly, wasn't a problem with their OmniCube switch, at least not with my machines. Windows had as much, or more problems with not having the console on the booting machine as fbsd

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Gordon Tetlow
As a preface to this whole thing, I find it higly amusing that you are sending this mail from a Linux box. Of course, for that matter, so am I. (I'm planning on changing that soon.) On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Jim Bryant wrote: I said I'd drop it, but apparently there are people that don't

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread Mike Smith
Here is the _precise_ problem with older firmware: The Belkin KVM switch uses the on-off-on or off-on-off of this LED to signal a port change character is coming next, and times out the port change request only after a little while. Ah, so the problem is actually a design defect in the

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Aug-01 Joe Kelsey wrote: Thank you very much for the clear and cogent explanation of your philosophy of the psm code. Could I suggest that you copy the aforementioned e-mail directly into the psm.c file for everyone to see in posterity? Also, I have a fundamental problem with

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Aug-01 Terry Lambert wrote: Mike Smith wrote: :Finally, most keyboard/mouse/monitor switches don't work with :FreeBSD; This is actually not true. I'd doubt that you've even tried many of them. *sigh* It seems no one has investigated why we probe keyboards at all. Maybe if

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Aug-01 Terry Lambert wrote: The FreeBSD keyboard detection is another matter; FreeBSD will assume that there is no keyboard, and try to helpfully drop you into serial console mode. Some of this _used_ to be mitigated by checking for the extended keyboard bit in the keyboard identify

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:54:08PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: FreeBSD is getting military contracts now. We need to think ahead to the needs of a whole new class of admin and user, and they are in highly restrictive environments that preclude `mv /usr/local/bin/*sh /bin`. And those

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 13-Aug-01 John Baldwin wrote: runtime interface (IMO). I realize the user side of the attributes is up for debate, but working on solving this problem is much more problem than complaining that people aren't giving you the free gift you want. s/problem/productive/2 -- John Baldwin

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Andrew Boothman
On Monday 13 August 2001 3:08 am, The Anarcat wrote: [This email contains coarse language due to the absurdity of the thread level we're in. My apologies to those offended. Also, my apologies to the author of the original mail. You have triggered very sensitive areas of my mind. :)]

Documentation in FreeBSD

2001-08-12 Thread Joe Kelsey
OK, so we have beaten the psm and keyboard code to death. The entire point that I have been trying to make in this discussion is that it is imperative to document design decisions somewhere that is likely to survive changes in maintainer. I have been working as an administrator and programmer

Netiquette (Was: Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach)

2001-08-12 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Warner Losh wrote: A word about tone. If you were to get as in my face about, say, pccard, as you about the psm driver, I'd certainly be ill inclined to provide you with what you want. Good Tone: Say Warner, why do you bother turning off the power after

Good Tone vs. Bad tone

2001-08-12 Thread Joe Kelsey
Warner Losh writes: Good Tone: Say Warner, why do you bother turning off the power after you suspend a socket. Shouldn't the power routines take care of that? Is there something subtle that's going on? Maybe a comment is in order? Bad Tone: Please

Re: Documentation in FreeBSD

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:51:05PM -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote: OK, so we have beaten the psm and keyboard code to death. The entire point that I have been trying to make in this discussion is that it is imperative to document design decisions somewhere that is likely to survive changes in

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Gordon Tetlow
Not to be a pain, but can you wrap lines at a more standard 74 columns as opposed to whatever you are currently wrapping them at? Thanks. On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Jim Bryant wrote: Gordon Tetlow wrote: As a preface to this whole thing, I find it higly amusing that you are sending this mail

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:54:08PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: FreeBSD is getting military contracts now. We need to think ahead to the needs of a whole new class of admin and user, and they are in highly restrictive environments that preclude

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 09:20:59PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: After seeing that grep is a GNU tool, I'm almost tempted to try writing a BSD-style grep for the fun/exercise of it. Rather than do that, continue the development of /usr/ports/textproc/freegrep, which was started for exactly the

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:15:15PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: Actually, it is up to us to resolve this. I don't think you understand how DOD operates. The vendor makes the changes, not DOD. Not the admin. Sigh. If an admin cannot handle /bin/sh long enough to get /usr mounted, they have no

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Jos Backus
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 09:20:37PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: After seeing that grep is a GNU tool, I'm almost tempted to try writing a BSD-style grep for the fun/exercise of it. lizzy:/usr/ports/textproc/freegrep# cat pkg-descr This is an implementation of grep(1) intended as a replacement

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 10:08:40PM -0400, The Anarcat wrote: And FreeBSD is the *vendor*? I don't think so. At least I don't hope so. Actually we *are*. Seen those ISO's up on ftp.freebsd.org?? -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: _sigprocmask in malloc.c causes full file table?

2001-08-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 05:25:42PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: It's like trying to find something in hierachically organized GNU info documentation: redundancy is useful, and try to find __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in the gcc documentation, when you need to read the man page carefully to find the

Re: FreeBSD's aggressive keyboard probe/attach

2001-08-12 Thread Chris Dillon
On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: Finally, most keyboard/mouse/monitor switches don't work with FreeBSD; for example, the Belkin console extender that uses the ethernet cable doesn't work at all (it's the best one out there), I'm using a Cybex KVM-over-CAT5 extender with a cheap

Re: bash in /usr/local/bin?

2001-08-12 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 17:04:01 -0500 Jim Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JB I said I'd drop it, but apparently there are people that don't understand the dinosaur mentality of certain organizations such as JB DOD, DISA/DECC, OSD, DARPA, USA, USN, USAF, and USMC. JB JB If it's not in the base