Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Mike Meyer
Warner Losh writes: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes: : The nasty downside of the the module system is that people who don't : adequately test module code before checking it in will screw up kernel : builds for kernels that don't need that code. But I did test it. But I had an

strange freeze while starting kde2 :(

2000-08-13 Thread Ilmar S. Habibulin
While starting kde2 beta my pc freezes and i have to push power off button. After reboot i hade to run fsck, because of "strange inconsistency". Some files(created by kde startup) were broken and contain corrupted data. Kernel doesn't panic, it just freezes. How can i examine this situation

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes: : Warner Losh writes: : In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes: : : The nasty downside of the the module system is that people who don't : : adequately test module code before checking it in will screw up kernel : : builds for kernels

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Leif Neland
I didn't mean to finger you particularly. It's just a bit upsetting to realize that I can't remember the last time I managed to do an update to -current without some kind of breakage. I realize that -current isn't guaranteed to build, but that's a bit ridiculous. I mean - I was pleasantly

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Doug Barton
I'm seeing a small problem with up to the minute sources in the install phase: === usr.sbin/sendmail install -c -o root -g wheel -m 644 /dev/null /var/log/sendmail.st install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/helpfile /etc/mail/helpfile

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 04:02:03PM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: hetzels Sendmail 8.11 has the ablity to due secure authentication with hetzels mail clients when compiled with Cyrus-SASL. hetzels Will the Cyrus-SASL library be imported to provide this hetzels capability? Or at least a

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 01:14:09AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: : Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? If not, : that's yet another argument for ditching cvs in favor of something : without so many flaws (like Perforce). Not when the files are in multiple different

Re: fail to compile kernel...

2000-08-13 Thread Idea Receiver
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Idea Receiver writes: : i have try to upgrade one of my 4.1 release to -current. : however, when i try to build the kernel, it failed as following : message. Upgrade your sources and try again. Warner cvsed this

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Mike Meyer
Warner Losh writes: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes: : Warner Losh writes: : In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes: : : The nasty downside of the the module system is that people who don't : : adequately test module code before checking it in will screw up kernel

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
ticso Getting STARTTLS also means putting sfio into base. Actually, it wouldn't. I was able to get Torek I/O working with STARTTLS as an FFR. I'm running with STARTTLS at home without using sfio. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
DougB I'm seeing a small problem with up to the minute sources in the install DougB phase: DougB + cp /etc/aliases /etc/mail/aliases DougB cp: not found DougB *** Error code 127 That is odd considering the step right before it uses 'mv' which is located in /bin/ (where 'cp' also lives). I

Re: cvsup overzealous

2000-08-13 Thread Mark Knight
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes With world and kernel of 10th August, 01:00 GMT cvsup is reporting 'SetAttrs' adjustments for every file it encounters on repeated runs against a server that has not been updated. Running under an old kernel, cvsup is not

Re: Problems with ATAPI CD driver

2000-08-13 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Donn Miller wrote: I've got a BTC 24x ATAPI CDROM driver, and I can't mount it. Attached is my dmesg.out. Typing mount /cdrom causes the mount command to hang, and it never did this before. Also, I'm getting these strange syslog messages. (See attached file messages.out.) I

Re: Problems with ATAPI CD driver

2000-08-13 Thread Donn Miller
Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Donn Miller wrote: I've got a BTC 24x ATAPI CDROM driver, and I can't mount it. Attached is my dmesg.out. Typing mount /cdrom causes the mount command to hang, and it never did this before. Also, I'm getting these strange syslog messages. (See attached

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: DougB I'm seeing a small problem with up to the minute sources in the install DougB phase: DougB + cp /etc/aliases /etc/mail/aliases DougB cp: not found DougB *** Error code 127 That is odd considering the step right before it uses 'mv'

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: gshapiro sendmail has been updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0. Some of the more visible gshapiro changes that may immediately affect your configuration include: gshapiro - New default file locations from

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes: : On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 01:14:09AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: : : Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? If not, : : that's yet another argument for ditching cvs in favor of something : : without so many flaws (like

Re: fail to compile kernel...

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Idea Receiver writes: : In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Idea :Receiver writes: : : i have try to upgrade one of my 4.1 release to -current. : : however, when i try to build the kernel, it failed as following : : message. : : Upgrade your sources and try again.

Re: mount_hpfs not built by default

2000-08-13 Thread Ustimenko Semen
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Alexander Langer wrote: Hello! In PR docs/20369 it was mentioned that mount_hpfs isn't built by default. Am I missing something? Why not? From the cvs-logs, it seems, it has just been forgotten :) However, I'm asking because maybe I missed a discussion back in

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes: : Hmm - you mean 'cvs diff' can't be pointed at sys to get a list of : everything you've touched? No, I mean that I have NEWCARD changes as well, that usually never get touched. And it is sometimes easy to get things confused. : I just now

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message 06e001c004fa$39e94d60$[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Leif Neland" writes: : What if the machine building snapshots took a note of the time it cvsup'ped. : Then if the build succeded, it would append this date to a file. : We could then feed this date to our cvsup, to get a version which at least :

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for Outlook) out of the box if we are serius about mailserver and security. If you're serious about security, you shouldn't support LOGIN (or PLAIN) unless adequate privacy

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:20:05 -0700 "Kurt D. Zeilenga" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Kurt At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for Outlook) out of the box if we are serius about mailserver and security. Kurt If you're

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Sun 2000-08-13 (09:20), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: A make.conf knob to use a userinstalled library may create problems with different versions of Cysus-SASL. I had some problems with that when uppgrading my mailservers to Sendmail 8.10. I'd recommend bringing Cyrus-SASL into the base system

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Johan Granlund
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for Outlook) out of the box if we are serius about mailserver and security. If you're serious about security, you shouldn't

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread John Hay
BTW, I love to see DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v4, Family=inet')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v6, Family=inet6')dnl Yes that together with "CFLAGS+=-DNETINET6" in the sendmail/Makefile and I have a working ipv6 mailer going. There is just an annoying message because of the anycast

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread John Polstra
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? No, but "cvs -nq update" will, and it's a lot faster too. John -- John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] John D. Polstra Co.,

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:24:09 +0200 (SAT) John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: BTW, I love to see DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v4, Family=inet')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v6, Family=inet6')dnl jhay Yes that together with "CFLAGS+=-DNETINET6" in the sendmail/Makefile jhay and I

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Sun 2000-08-13 (10:48), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: At 06:53 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: On Sun 2000-08-13 (09:20), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: A make.conf knob to use a userinstalled library may create problems with different versions of Cysus-SASL. I had some problems with that

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, John Polstra wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? No, but "cvs -nq update" will, and it's a lot faster too. I normally use that, but "cvs status | grep Status" may be

New sendmail: junk characters in header

2000-08-13 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
To see the bug, just send any mail to yourself. Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e7DIV4a34899 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 22:31:04 +0400 (MSD)?g ^

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
ume Beacuse default confCW_FILE doesn't have -o option, freebsd.mc should ume have "define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/local-host-names)dnl" line. ume Unless this, /etc/mail/local-host-names will be mandatory. Good point. I've fixed this. ume BTW, I love to see ume

Re: mount_hpfs not built by default

2000-08-13 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Ustimenko Semen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I think there are too few people who really use HPFS. So it That's not a good reason :) I don't have HPFS partitions any more, so i even can't verify if it works. Hmm. One should test it. I can't, unfortunately. Alex -- cat:

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
jhay There is just an annoying message because of the anycast address: jhay Aug 13 16:38:47 angel sendmail[11947]: gethostbyaddr(3ffe:2900:fffa:4::) failed: 1 jhay Is that because of a configuration error or just because sendmail needs jhay to check for anycast addresses? sendmail tries to

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
gshapiro Can you see if this patch makes the error go away? gshapiro Index: conf.c gshapiro === A better patch: Index: conf.c === RCS file: /cvs/sendmail/conf.c,v

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread John Hay
jhay There is just an annoying message because of the anycast address: jhay Aug 13 16:38:47 angel sendmail[11947]: gethostbyaddr(3ffe:2900:fffa:4::) failed: 1 jhay Is that because of a configuration error or just because sendmail needs jhay to check for anycast addresses? sendmail

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Mike Meyer
Warner Losh writes: So we're down to stale sources at one of the mirrors, I think. My kernel tree here is completely clean and checked out from the my local cvs tree. Where do you get your sources from? What revision of src/sys/dev/pccard/card_if.m do you have? The following changed

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 21:28:20 +0200 (SAT) John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jhay There is just an annoying message because of the anycast address: jhay Aug 13 16:38:47 angel sendmail[11947]: gethostbyaddr(3ffe:2900:fffa:4::) failed: 1 jhay Is that because of a configuration error or just

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Johan Granlund
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:20:05 -0700 "Kurt D. Zeilenga" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Kurt At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for Outlook) out of the box if we are

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes: : Pointing fingers isn't the difference I was talking about. It's more : in the attitude after the fact. On FreeBSD, it's "Ok, I fixed : it." Elsewhere, people apologize for breaking the bulid. I sent out a message at the time saying I'm sorry for

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
ume Please try this patch. ume Index: sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c ume diff -u sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c.orig sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c Oops, previous patch is insufficient. I forgot to open INET6 socket. Index: sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c diff -u

Problems with stable (believed to be in -current as well)

2000-08-13 Thread Rod Taylor
My server functions properly (harddrives inside). My diskless machines (mounting same filesystems via NFS) are having problems. Thanks in advance. bash-2.03$ top top: nlist failed bash-2.03$ vmstat vmstat: undefined symbols: _cp_time _kmemstatistics _bucket _zlist Occurs with both 4.0 and

Re: Problems with stable (believed to be in -current as well)

2000-08-13 Thread Rod Taylor
Wesley Morgan wrote: On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Rod Taylor wrote: My server functions properly (harddrives inside). My diskless machines (mounting same filesystems via NFS) are having problems. Thanks in advance. bash-2.03$ top top: nlist failed If you installed a new kernel and

Re: Problems with stable (believed to be in -current as well)

2000-08-13 Thread Rod Taylor
Sean O'Connell wrote: Rod Taylor stated: : Wesley Morgan wrote: : : On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Rod Taylor wrote: : : My server functions properly (harddrives inside). My diskless machines : (mounting same filesystems via NFS) are having problems. Thanks in : advance. : :

Re: Slow ssh throughput with -current

2000-08-13 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2000-Aug-10 15:36:01 +1000, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just noticed a really peculiar network slowdown with -current from about a week ago. The machine has two NICs - an old 16-bit SMC card (ed0) running 10baseT and a PCI SMC card (tx0) running 100baseTX full duplex. When I scp

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread John Hay
Yes, this fix it. I don't see the message anymore and it still works too. :-) Thanks. John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ume Please try this patch. ume Index: sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c ume diff -u sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c.orig sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c Oops,