On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:08:32AM -0400, Rod Smith wrote:
According to the timetable at
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/schedule.html, DP2 for FreeBSD 5.0
I've updated that timetable to remove the specific date (it may take
up to 24 hours for the website to be updated). We're actively
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:41:41PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
A 5.0 DP2 branch was created just yesterday. So how ever good
yesterday's -current was will affect DP2. I rather expected the release
engineers to at least querry the lists to ask what the known issues are
before picking which
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
As near as I can tell the panic is happening in VOP_GETATTR(). It looks
to me like it would be possible for the vnode to be recycled between the
time when it passes the vp-v_mount test at the top of the loop and the
time when vn_lock() succeeds. Shouldn't we bump the vnode reference
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling
some boot blocks), but is broken in gcc3 for at least compile-time
Which boot blocks?
assignments to long longs and
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out.
How would gcc-3.2 get more buggy over time than it is today??
I said it was
Some experiences with ACPI and APM on a Toshiba Portege 7220cte.
Interesting is the extreme CPU slow-down after suspend/resume
using ACPI.
Running current, (cvsup-ed Aug. 30). A fixed-up ASL (similar to
the Tecra8200.asl diff from Mitsuru IWASAKI) is used with
acpi_dsdt_load=YES in
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:52:20AM +0200, Ted Lindgreen wrote:
- Suspending in X freezes the system. I've not found any way
out of that, other than hard resetting the system.
Could you try running acpidump before and after running X? On my
machine the ACPI tables vanish when you run X 'cos
÷ Sat, 31.08.2002, × 02:04, Jens Schweikhardt ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:03:17PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
# ? Wed, 28.08.2002, ? 23:46, Bruce A. Mah ???:
# If memory serves me right, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
#
# # Do you have time to commit mention of it to
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:46:05PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
This is *totally* UNTRUE:
/usr/local/bin//mutt:
libslang.so = /usr/local/lib/libslang.so (0x280e5000)
libm.so.2 = /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x28148000)
libssl.so.2 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.2 (0x28167000)
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling
some boot blocks), but is broken in gcc3 for at least compile-time
Which
[Quoting David Malone, on Sep 2, 12:22, in Re: CPU slowdown usi ...]
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:52:20AM +0200, Ted Lindgreen wrote:
- Suspending in X freezes the system. I've not found any way
out of that, other than hard resetting the system.
Could you try running acpidump before and
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
I will import GCC 3.2 snapshot from the top of FSF gcc-3_2-branch in
about ten minutes. This task should not take long to complete, but since
this is the first time I am doing it, there is good possibility of
unexpected delays, so please be patient.
Please
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
I will import GCC 3.2 snapshot from the top of FSF gcc-3_2-branch in
about ten minutes. This task should not take long to complete, but since
this is the first time I am doing it, there is good possibility of
unexpected delays, so please
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling
some boot blocks), but is broken in gcc3 for at
Today (after GCC 3.2 import and makeworld) I
try to upgrade 'gmake' port and resulting 'gmake' command
dumps core in the libc's 'qsort'.
When I make 'gmake' without --with-included-gettext
option it work - at least I can make 'databases/gdbm' port with
it (which can be made
I just finished updating my alpha box to shortly before the gcc3.2
import and now I'm seeing some weird breakage:
$ man ls
out of memory
It's actually nroff (groff) that aborts.
Also:
$ startx
[...]
xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2): unable to connect to X server
xinit: No such
John,
You might want to check out www.rackmount.com. Bought
some 1U/2U rackmount gears from them and pre-loaded with
FreeBSD 4.5. (Six months ago). Their machines are great.
Never had any problem.
Bryan Taylor
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, John Chang wrote:
Do you know where I could get a good
On (2002/09/01 19:12), Marc Fonvieille wrote:
I had freeze at boot problem with my laptop and -CURRENT:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=42262
I found the solution: setting hw.pci.enable_io_modes to 0.
So I have a question: that sysctl has to be =1 by default? I mean if I
have
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
aout support is still required for a few things (mainly for compiling
some
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 01:09:11 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except I just used it to compile biosboot :-). (I had more problems
with ufs2 changes than with the compiler.)
Actually, I agree. Not having a clean break in FreeBSD-3 was very
expensive. Support for running
To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
libiconv-1.8_1.
cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -march=athlon -c
./iconv.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/iconv.lo
In file included from gbk.h:64,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
libiconv-1.8_1.
cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe\
-march=athlon -c ./iconv.c -fPIC
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:52:56 -0700
Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O -pipe -march=athlon
^^
This bug is in GCC PR database. Do not use -march=athlon for now.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
BTW, the bug is present in official 3.2 release too.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:01:31AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
libiconv-1.8_1.
cc -I. -I. -I../include
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:05:40PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 08:52:56 -0700
Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O -pipe -march=athlon
^^
This bug is in GCC PR database. Do not use -march=athlon for now.
Okay. In case it matters, world
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 05:35, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I just finished updating my alpha box to shortly before the gcc3.2
import and now I'm seeing some weird breakage:
$ startx
[...]
xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2): unable to connect to X server
xinit: No such process
I'm going to toggle the switch to activate rcNG as the default boot scripts.
If you experience any problems, put rc_ng=NO in your /etc/rc.conf and
please report any problems.
-gordon
msg42462/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c: In function `ipfw_ctl':
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:2508: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different
size
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:2521: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different
size
Some of the code
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:34:48AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 01:09:11 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except I just used it to compile biosboot :-). (I had more problems
with ufs2 changes than with the compiler.)
Actually, I agree. Not
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:33:35AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
I'm going to toggle the switch to activate rcNG as the default boot scripts.
If you experience any problems, put rc_ng=NO in your /etc/rc.conf and
please report any problems.
There is one outstanding issue with the sendmail script
Not a GCC fault. The bug is in internal gettext library gmake is linked
with. I looked into read_alias_file function and I simply cannot believe
what I am seeing there. Do they really believe malloc is supposed to
resize memory in-place all the time? Look what happens with map[0-n]
elements every
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 13:06:31 -0400
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do they really believe malloc
^^^ I meant realloc here.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:17:25AM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out.
How would
I've had to add ex, touch and gencat to the installworld target. And
I've still not manged to complete a installworld.
anybody else see this?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:01:31AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
libiconv-1.8_1.
cc -I. -I. -I../include
Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ startx
[...]
xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2): unable to connect to X server
xinit: No such process (errno 3): Server error.
Of course those xinit errors are useless; I should have looked at
XFree86.0.log.
You need to either
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a GCC fault. The bug is in internal gettext library gmake is linked
with. I looked into read_alias_file function and I simply cannot believe
what I am seeing there.
PR ports/41075.
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber [EMAIL
Christian Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's actually nroff (groff) that aborts.
Even a simple groff --version or groff --help will produce the
out of memory error.
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:08:41PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
BTW, the bug is present in official 3.2 release too.
What about 3.1.1 release?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 10:21:13PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
Actually, if 3.2 doesn't use thunks, it's likely to break Mozilla again.
This is really not that big of a deal. I'll just need to alter a patch,
and update the Mozilla people.
My understanding from watching the
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:10:11 -0700
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:08:41PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
BTW, the bug is present in official 3.2 release too.
What about 3.1.1 release?
I have GCC 3.1.1 port installed on STABLE. libiconv barf when compiled
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On (2002/09/01 19:12), Marc Fonvieille wrote:
:
: I had freeze at boot problem with my laptop and -CURRENT:
:
: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=42262
:
: I found the solution: setting
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:29:05AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
I think it should be turned off now. That will help shake out any issues
and people complaining that it is gone. The sooner the better.
It isn't a simple knob to turn it off. It requires several source
changes.
To Unsubscribe:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Peter Wemm wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:24:08PM +1000,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
aout support is still
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I've had to add ex, touch and gencat to the installworld target. And
: I've still not manged to complete a installworld.
:
: anybody else see this?
Index: Makefile.inc1
David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:29:05AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
I think it should be turned off now. That will help shake out any issues
and people complaining that it is gone. The sooner the better.
It isn't a simple knob to turn it off. It requires several source
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very* careful to accurately describe what is being
suggested.
I believe it is that 5.x a.out binaries not be supported.
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:52:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I've had to add ex, touch and gencat to the installworld target. And
: I've still not manged to complete a installworld.
:
: anybody else
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:01:31AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:52:56AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
To test gcc 3.2, I've been updating all of my installed
ports. It appears gcc 3.2 is having problems with
libiconv-1.8_1.
cc -I. -I. -I../include
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:32:28PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I made it 1 because I wanted to get feedback on what hardware is
broken. So far only two people have complained. Hundreds complained
when the default was 0. Seems like the choice was good to me still.
I knew there was a
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build 3.2 or gcc 3.2 trying to build itself?
Buildworld
Le 2002-09-01, Scott Long écrivait :
=== aic7xxx/ahc
(null): Unable to malloc scope object
*** Error code 70
Um, what?
I just did a buildworld, followed by a buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
and did not see this.
Um, I see this one as well, on a not-too-recent -CURRENT that I'm trying
Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following? I'm able to
build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge. I've not seen
this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
=== aic7xxx
=== aic7xxx/aicasm
make -f
Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following? I'm able to
build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge. I've not seen
this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
This is the third report of this that I've seen, and I'm completely
baffled. How
Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following? I'm able to
build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge. I've not seen
this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
This is the third report of this that I've seen, and I'm completely
baffled.
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very* careful to accurately describe what is being
suggested.
I
* De: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support in
5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very*
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build
The complete transcript is available here:
http://sparc64.style9.org/sparc64.log
Which still does not answer my question. What GCC version is on this
machine?
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The complete transcript is available here:
http://sparc64.style9.org/sparc64.log
Which still does not answer my question. What GCC version is on this
machine?
Sorry, I thought your question was whether it was in the cross
building stage or
Greetings everyone:
I decided to pull the trigger and try to run FreeBSD on my IBM
ThinkPad 770Z with a 3COM 3CXFEM656C 10/100 NIC + 56k modem Cardbus combo.
Originally I tried 4.6.2-RELEASE but Cardbus isn't support so I tried both
a NetGear FA411 10/100 PCMCIA and the LinkSys PCM100
On Sunday 01 September 2002 05:58 pm, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
= GCC 3.2.1-pre is now in the tree. Please let me know if you see any
= problems recompiling your world/kernel.
=
= Remember to recompile your C++ ports. GCC 3.2 is not binary compatible
= with 3.1.
Most excellent! Thanks!
Is anyone else seeing something similar to the following?
I'm able to
build world, but can't get this kernel build to budge.
I've not seen
this error before so I'm a tad lost as to where to poke next. -sc
This is the third report of this that I've seen, and I'm
Hi,
with -current I get during compiling kdelibs3 (and after successfully compiling
qt3 and arts):
...
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../dcop -I../libltdl -I../kdecore -I../kdeui
-I../kio -I../kio/kio -I../kio/kfile -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -
pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT
yes binary support will remain.. if you need to generate new ones (?)
You say this as if no-one would want to do it, but I still use
programs (lisp and prolog compilers) that need to generate and read in
compiled .o files, and undump themselves after reading in such
files, and which are never
* De: Richard Tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
yes binary support will remain.. if you need to generate new ones (?)
You say this as if no-one would want to do it, but I still use
programs (lisp and prolog compilers) that
At 12:29 AM 9/3/2002 +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
with -current I get during compiling kdelibs3 (and after successfully compiling
qt3 and arts):
...
c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../dcop -I../libltdl -I../kdecore -I../kdeui
-I../kio -I../kio/kio -I../kio/kfile -I/usr/X11R6/include
Dear all,
I have now uploaded the final text of my dissertation on
http://www.geocities.com/tzmnlaos/oss/tzouris_diss.pdf
Thanks to everybody that helped towards the completions of this research.
Best Regards,
Menelaos.
Tzouris,M wrote:
Hello again,
I uploaded a newer version of my
i cvsup'd last night, and now i tried portupdate -a -f and debugging
build problems with libtool i found that on my system i can make perl spin
and consume 100% of a CPU just by:
perl -pe s/foo/bar/g /tmp
(turs out i can do this with any perl command, even perl --version...)
i also can't kill
I think you're extremeley confused.
In what way? Or are you just being rude?
-- RIchard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:17:25AM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy
by the
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:29:23AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
I tried CFLAGS with -O[1|2] and with or without -march=-pentium3.
Always the same error.
Anyone else?
I'm seeing the exact same thing. I can't install linux_base either, nor
can I build rpm.
- alex
To Unsubscribe:
* De: Richard Tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
I think you're extremeley confused.
In what way? Or are you just being rude?
GCC being able to produce a.out format binaries has nothing to do with
the ability of a Lisp or
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:27:45 -0700
Alex Zepeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing the exact same thing. I can't install linux_base either,
nor can I build rpm.
Have no idea what is your problem with linux_base, but rpm build fine
here after one gets past __size_t and machine/types.h.
--
Andrea Campi wrote:
cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe\
-march=athlon -c ./iconv.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/iconv.lo
^
I get the same error on a P3:
cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe
-march=pentiumpro
On Mon, 02 Sep 2002 17:20:49 -0700
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cc -I. -I. -I../include -I./../include -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe
-march=pentiumpro -c ./iconv.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/iconv.lo
^
Maybe -march=* doesn't work?
I traced it down to broken
The patch I sent is reversed. Use patch -R to apply.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
* De: David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: aout support broken in gcc3 ]
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:24:19PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
I thought it was part of the plan to drop all traces of a.out support
in
5.x. Am I wrong?
We should be *very*
Well, I ended up unlinking it from the build and am installing now.
Once I get a fresh world installed, I'll try and rebuild world again
to see if the problem persists. Would you like me to get a ktrace of
aicasm running before I rebuild world? -sc
That would have been interesting.
--
Where can I find this patch? I didn't see it in the message body or attached to any
of your previous messages.
Sorry,
apparently attachments are stripped now before being delivered
to the mailing lists. The patch is below:
Index: cp/cp-lang.c
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:10:42PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
Have no idea what is your problem with linux_base, but rpm build fine
here after one gets past __size_t and machine/types.h.
And how does one do that?
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is this gcc 3.1 trying to build 3.2 or gcc 3.2
Apparently, On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:21:12PM -0700,
Peter Wemm said words to the effect of;
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
I ran into this, and found that re-running config and make depend made it
go away. Didn't have time to do any other follow-up.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Long, Scott wrote:
Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 19:51:59 GMT
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus
method.o: In function `use_thunk':
method.o(.text+0x90c): undefined reference to `sparc_output_mi_thunk'
Is
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:30:19PM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
gordont There is one outstanding issue with the sendmail script that I'm working on
gordont a solution for. In the general case it should work fine. If you set
gordont sendmail_enable=NONE it will echo a benign warning about
At 4:59 PM -0400 9/2/02, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
On Sunday 01 September 2002 05:58 pm, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
= GCC 3.2.1-pre is now in the tree. Please let me know if you
= see any problems recompiling your world/kernel.
=
= Remember to recompile your C++ ports. GCC 3.2 is not binary
=
* De: Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-09-02 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: GCC 3.2.1-pre and /usr/src/UPDATING ]
Someone needs to update /usr/src/UPDATING then, so people will
find out about this need to recompile their C++ world. Who is
it that updates UPDATING these days?
I just updated it for gcc 3.2.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
93 matches
Mail list logo
