Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread John Hay
Yes, this fix it. I don't see the message anymore and it still works too. :-) Thanks. John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ume> Please try this patch. > > ume> Index: sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c > ume> diff -u sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c.orig sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c > > Oo

Re: Slow ssh throughput with -current

2000-08-13 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2000-Aug-10 15:36:01 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I just noticed a really peculiar network slowdown with -current from >about a week ago. The machine has two NICs - an old 16-bit SMC card >(ed0) running 10baseT and a PCI SMC card (tx0) running 100baseTX full >duplex. > >When

Re: Problems with stable (believed to be in -current as well)

2000-08-13 Thread Rod Taylor
Sean O'Connell wrote: > > Rod Taylor stated: > : Wesley Morgan wrote: > : > > : > On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Rod Taylor wrote: > : > > : > > My server functions properly (harddrives inside). My diskless machines > : > > (mounting same filesystems via NFS) are having problems. Thanks in > : > > advanc

Re: Problems with stable (believed to be in -current as well)

2000-08-13 Thread Rod Taylor
Wesley Morgan wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Rod Taylor wrote: > > > My server functions properly (harddrives inside). My diskless machines > > (mounting same filesystems via NFS) are having problems. Thanks in > > advance. > > > > bash-2.03$ top > > top: nlist failed > > > > If you installe

Problems with stable (believed to be in -current as well)

2000-08-13 Thread Rod Taylor
My server functions properly (harddrives inside). My diskless machines (mounting same filesystems via NFS) are having problems. Thanks in advance. bash-2.03$ top top: nlist failed bash-2.03$ vmstat vmstat: undefined symbols: _cp_time _kmemstatistics _bucket _zlist Occurs with both 4.0 and

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
ume> Please try this patch. ume> Index: sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c ume> diff -u sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c.orig sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c Oops, previous patch is insufficient. I forgot to open INET6 socket. Index: sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail/conf.c diff -u sendmail-8.11.0/sendmail

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: : Pointing fingers isn't the difference I was talking about. It's more : in the attitude after the fact. On FreeBSD, it's "Ok, I fixed : it." Elsewhere, people apologize for breaking the bulid. I sent out a message at the time saying I'm sorry for

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Johan Granlund
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:20:05 -0700 > > "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Kurt> At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: > >I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for > >Outlook) out of the

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Sun 2000-08-13 (10:48), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > > At 06:53 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > > >On Sun 2000-08-13 (09:20), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > > >> >A make.conf knob to use a userinstalled library may create problems with > >

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 21:28:20 +0200 (SAT) > John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > jhay> There is just an annoying message because of the anycast address: > > jhay> Aug 13 16:38:47 angel sendmail[11947]: gethostbyaddr(3ffe:2900:fffa:4::) >failed: 1 > > jhay> Is that because of a configu

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Mike Meyer
Warner Losh writes: > So we're down to stale sources at one of the mirrors, I think. My > kernel tree here is completely clean and checked out from the my local > cvs tree. Where do you get your sources from? What revision of > src/sys/dev/pccard/card_if.m do you have? The following changed f

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread John Hay
> jhay> There is just an annoying message because of the anycast address: > > jhay> Aug 13 16:38:47 angel sendmail[11947]: gethostbyaddr(3ffe:2900:fffa:4::) >failed: 1 > > jhay> Is that because of a configuration error or just because sendmail needs > jhay> to check for anycast addresses? > >

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
gshapiro> Can you see if this patch makes the error go away? gshapiro> Index: conf.c gshapiro> === A better patch: Index: conf.c === RCS file: /cvs/sendmail/conf.c,v r

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
jhay> There is just an annoying message because of the anycast address: jhay> Aug 13 16:38:47 angel sendmail[11947]: gethostbyaddr(3ffe:2900:fffa:4::) failed: 1 jhay> Is that because of a configuration error or just because sendmail needs jhay> to check for anycast addresses? sendmail tries to

Re: mount_hpfs not built by default

2000-08-13 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Ustimenko Semen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I think there are too few people who really use HPFS. So it That's not a good reason :) > I don't have HPFS partitions any more, so i even can't verify if > it works. Hmm. One should test it. I can't, unfortunately. Alex -- cat: /home/alex

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
ume> Beacuse default confCW_FILE doesn't have -o option, freebsd.mc should ume> have "define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/local-host-names)dnl" line. ume> Unless this, /etc/mail/local-host-names will be mandatory. Good point. I've fixed this. ume> BTW, I love to see ume> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=M

Re: New sendmail: junk characters in header

2000-08-13 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:39:30AM -0700, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > To see the bug, just send any mail to yourself. > > Received: (from ache@localhost) > by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e7DIV4a34899 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 22:31:04 +0400 (MSD)?g >

Re: New sendmail: junk characters in header

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
ache> To see the bug, just send any mail to yourself. ache> Received: (from ache@localhost) ache> by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e7DIV4a34899 ache> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 22:31:04 +0400 (MSD)?g ache> ^ ache> (envelope-from ache)œ ache> ^^^ Thanks for the report, fixe

New sendmail: junk characters in header

2000-08-13 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
To see the bug, just send any mail to yourself. Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e7DIV4a34899 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 22:31:04 +0400 (MSD)?g ^ (envelope-

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? > > No, but "cvs -nq update" will, and it's a lot faster too. I normally use that, but "cvs status | grep Status" m

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Sun 2000-08-13 (10:48), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > At 06:53 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > >On Sun 2000-08-13 (09:20), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > >> >A make.conf knob to use a userinstalled library may create problems with > >> >different versions of Cysus-SASL. I had some problems

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 06:53 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: >On Sun 2000-08-13 (09:20), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: >> >A make.conf knob to use a userinstalled library may create problems with >> >different versions of Cysus-SASL. I had some problems with that when >> >uppgrading my mailservers to Sendmail 8

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:24:09 +0200 (SAT) > John Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > BTW, I love to see > > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v4, Family=inet')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v6, Family=inet6')dnl > jhay> Yes that together with "CFLAGS+=-DNETINET6" in the sendmail/Makefi

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? No, but "cvs -nq update" will, and it's a lot faster too. John -- John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] John D. Polstra &

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread John Hay
> BTW, I love to see > > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v4, Family=inet')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MTA-v6, Family=inet6')dnl > Yes that together with "CFLAGS+=-DNETINET6" in the sendmail/Makefile and I have a working ipv6 mailer going. There is just an annoying message because of the any

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Johan Granlund
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: > >I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for > >Outlook) out of the box if we are serius about mailserver and security. > > If you're serious about security, you shouldn

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Sun 2000-08-13 (09:20), Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: > >A make.conf knob to use a userinstalled library may create problems with > >different versions of Cysus-SASL. I had some problems with that when > >uppgrading my mailservers to Sendmail 8.10. > > I'd recommend bringing Cyrus-SASL into the base

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 09:20:05 -0700 > "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Kurt> At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: >I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for >Outlook) out of the box if we are serius about mailserver and security. Kurt

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 01:49 PM 8/13/00 +0200, Johan Granlund wrote: >I think we have to support rfc2554 autenthication (With MECH LOGIN for >Outlook) out of the box if we are serius about mailserver and security. If you're serious about security, you shouldn't support LOGIN (or PLAIN) unless adequate privacy protec

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message <06e001c004fa$39e94d60$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Leif Neland" writes: : What if the machine building snapshots took a note of the time it cvsup'ped. : Then if the build succeded, it would append this date to a file. : We could then feed this date to our cvsup, to get a version which at least

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: : Hmm - you mean 'cvs diff' can't be pointed at sys to get a list of : everything you've touched? No, I mean that I have NEWCARD changes as well, that usually never get touched. And it is sometimes easy to get things confused. : I just now grab

Re: mount_hpfs not built by default

2000-08-13 Thread Ustimenko Semen
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Alexander Langer wrote: > Hello! > > In PR docs/20369 it was mentioned that mount_hpfs isn't built by > default. > > Am I missing something? Why not? From the cvs-logs, it seems, it has > just been forgotten :) > However, I'm asking because maybe I missed a discussion ba

Re: fail to compile kernel...

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Idea Receiver writes: : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Idea :Receiver writes: : > : i have try to upgrade one of my 4.1 release to -current. : > : however, when i try to build the kernel, it failed as following : > : message. : > : > Upgrade your sources and tr

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes: : On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 01:14:09AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: : > : Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? If not, : > : that's yet another argument for ditching cvs in favor of something : > : without so many flaws (like Pe

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 15:40:24 -0700 (PDT) > Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: gshapiro> sendmail has been updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0. Some of the more visible gshapiro> changes that may immediately affect your configuration include: gshapiro> - New default file locations

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Johan Granlund
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > hetzels> Sendmail 8.11 has the ablity to due secure authentication with > hetzels> mail clients when compiled with Cyrus-SASL. > > hetzels> Will the Cyrus-SASL library be imported to provide this > hetzels> capability? Or at least a make.conf

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > DougB> I'm seeing a small problem with up to the minute sources in the install > DougB> phase: > > DougB> + cp /etc/aliases /etc/mail/aliases > DougB> cp: not found > DougB> *** Error code 127 > > That is odd considering the step right before i

Re: Problems with ATAPI CD driver

2000-08-13 Thread Donn Miller
Soren Schmidt wrote: > > It seems Donn Miller wrote: > > I've got a BTC 24x ATAPI CDROM driver, and I can't mount it. Attached is > > my dmesg.out. Typing mount /cdrom causes the mount command to hang, and > > it never did this before. Also, I'm getting these strange syslog > > messages. (See

Re: Problems with ATAPI CD driver

2000-08-13 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Donn Miller wrote: > I've got a BTC 24x ATAPI CDROM driver, and I can't mount it. Attached is > my dmesg.out. Typing mount /cdrom causes the mount command to hang, and > it never did this before. Also, I'm getting these strange syslog > messages. (See attached file messages.out.) I t

Re: cvsup overzealous

2000-08-13 Thread Mark Knight
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> With world and kernel of 10th August, 01:00 GMT cvsup is reporting >> 'SetAttrs' adjustments for every file it encounters on repeated runs >> against a server that has not been updated. >> >> Running under an old kernel, c

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
DougB> I'm seeing a small problem with up to the minute sources in the install DougB> phase: DougB> + cp /etc/aliases /etc/mail/aliases DougB> cp: not found DougB> *** Error code 127 That is odd considering the step right before it uses 'mv' which is located in /bin/ (where 'cp' also lives). I

Re: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
ticso> Getting STARTTLS also means putting sfio into base. Actually, it wouldn't. I was able to get Torek I/O working with STARTTLS as an FFR. I'm running with STARTTLS at home without using sfio. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body o

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Mike Meyer
Warner Losh writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: > : Warner Losh writes: > : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: > : > : The nasty downside of the the module system is that people who don't > : > : adequately test module code before checking it in will screw

Re: fail to compile kernel...

2000-08-13 Thread Idea Receiver
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Idea >Receiver writes: > : i have try to upgrade one of my 4.1 release to -current. > : however, when i try to build the kernel, it failed as following > : message. > > Upgrade your sources and try again. > > Warner c

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 01:14:09AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > : Won't the 'cvs diff' command tell you about such things? If not, > : that's yet another argument for ditching cvs in favor of something > : without so many flaws (like Perforce). > > Not when the files are in multiple different dire

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 04:02:03PM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > hetzels> Sendmail 8.11 has the ablity to due secure authentication with > hetzels> mail clients when compiled with Cyrus-SASL. > > hetzels> Will the Cyrus-SASL library be imported to provide this > hetzels> capability? Or at

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail updated from 8.9.3 to 8.11.0 in -current

2000-08-13 Thread Doug Barton
I'm seeing a small problem with up to the minute sources in the install phase: ===> usr.sbin/sendmail install -c -o root -g wheel -m 644 /dev/null /var/log/sendmail.st install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/helpfile /etc/mail/helpfile in

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Leif Neland
> I didn't mean to finger you particularly. It's just a bit upsetting to > realize that I can't remember the last time I managed to do an update > to -current without some kind of breakage. I realize that -current > isn't guaranteed to build, but that's a bit ridiculous. I mean - I was > pleasant

Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...)

2000-08-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: : Warner Losh writes: : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Meyer writes: : > : The nasty downside of the the module system is that people who don't : > : adequately test module code before checking it in will screw up kernel : > : builds for ker

strange freeze while starting kde2 :(

2000-08-13 Thread Ilmar S. Habibulin
While starting kde2 beta my pc freezes and i have to push power off button. After reboot i hade to run fsck, because of "strange inconsistency". Some files(created by kde startup) were broken and contain corrupted data. Kernel doesn't panic, it just freezes. How can i examine this situation mor