Re: src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c broken

2000-10-08 Thread Doug Barton
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Are you sure your tree is entirely in sync ? Yes... I've checked it several times. > I can't reproduce your problem here with the NOTES/LINT kernel... The following patch got my kernel compiled and running, although I can't say it's the right thin

Re: src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c broken

2000-10-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Are you sure your tree is entirely in sync ? I can't reproduce your problem here with the NOTES/LINT kernel... > Version 1.16 of src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c, removing > broke the kernel build for me. Attached is the >relevant log, and my kernel file. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNI

Re: Recent kernels won't boot

2000-10-08 Thread Mike Smith
> > That was it. Is the 4MB kernel size limit documented anywhere? > > I don't know :-) I luckily noticed this by a lot of trials. I'm not aware of any 4MB limit on kernel size (and I ought to be if there is one 8). Can you run the details past me? (I've regularly booted much larger kernel

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001008 22:36] wrote: > Wow. Is it just me or does FreeBSD like to point fingers at everything that > is not the issue. I do not believe that my mailer has anything to do with > this. If you cannot roll with the punches, then that is your problem. I don't eve

Re: Recent kernels won't boot

2000-10-08 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
> That was it. Is the 4MB kernel size limit documented anywhere? I don't know :-) I luckily noticed this by a lot of trials. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c broken

2000-10-08 Thread Doug Barton
Version 1.16 of src/sys/dev/syscons/scvesactl.c, removing broke the kernel build for me. Attached is the relevant log, and my kernel file. Doug -- "The dead cannot be seduced." - Kai, "Lexx" Do YOU Yahoo!? cc -c -O -march=pentiumpro -pipe -Wall -Wredun

RE: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Tony Johnson
Jordan Hubbard. I just want to say publicly that since I have been cvsup-ing Freebsd 3.0-Current (with this when the SMP/CAM code came out.) I just want to apologize to you since cooler heads prevail. Peace bro -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Beh

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Jordan Hubbard
> Well deal with it and get releng4 back up. That reminds me of a joke: Q. "What do engineers use for birth control?" A. "Their personalities." We now return you to our regularly scheduled content-free discussion. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur

RE: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Tony Johnson
Wow. Is it just me or does FreeBSD like to point fingers at everything that is not the issue. I do not believe that my mailer has anything to do with this. If you cannot roll with the punches, then that is your problem. Well deal with it and get releng4 back up. if "piss off" is an exceptable

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Jordan Hubbard
I'm sorry, but BSDi's dead-alien based UPS (as described in that fine documentary film "repo man") has been unreliable lately and the machines haven't been staying up. We've also been forced by the silicon valley personnel crunch to hire a new system administrator who's a little strange (he refer

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Please get mailer that doesn't quote the messages you're replying to in such a brain dead manner. * Mike Smith wrote: > > Uh, folks, releng4 is hosted at (and donated by) Yahoo, and BSDi have > exactly *nothing* to do with its availability or otherwise. > > Before making absurd allegations like

RE: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Tony Johnson
I was downloading 1007 this weekend and getting 7-8k a second from current.freebsd.org. What they are saying is not totally inaccurate. Please stop dis-respecting other peoples comments just because you do not agree with them! What is your comment to this... Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.0

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Mike Smith
> Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by > BSDI Uh, folks, releng4 is hosted at (and donated by) Yahoo, and BSDi have exactly *nothing* to do with its availability or otherwise. Before making absurd allegations like this, please apply a few neurons to

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:13:56PM -0700, Bill Woods mail wrote: > Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by > BSDI The clue boat left the docks and you were standing on the pier. Might I suggest a long walk... -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Bill Woods mail
Yea, guess so, but I cant help but notice this started after the buyout by BSDI On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > And releng4.freebsd.org is totally missing from the Internet. I suppose > they are having another hardware problem again? Seems FreeBSD is a bit tough > on

Re: current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
And releng4.freebsd.org is totally missing from the Internet. I suppose they are having another hardware problem again? Seems FreeBSD is a bit tough on hardware these days. Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Bill Woods mail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, attila! wrote: >Thank you; I will refine it out, plus get it ready for >inclusion in the /usr/src/contrib tree if so permitted. I >am a firm believer in KISS for the unwashed, and will >therefore establish the initial configuration with defaults >to elimin

current.freebsd.org

2000-10-08 Thread Bill Woods mail
whats up with current.freebsd.org, its not allowing anon ftp To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: sio problems?

2000-10-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:03:12PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > I recently got my digital camera back out, and started pulling the old > pictures from it. I noticed something I hadn't ever seen before - silo > overflows from the sio port. At the moment, I'm wondering if this is a > known problem tha

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- on Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:46:47 +0200, Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Actually, mailwrapper (I don't know about this mailcap thing, > I'm only running STABLE right now for lack of machines) does > this job. Have you looked at /etc/mail/mailer.conf? The

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
on 8 Oct 2000 13:14:14 +0200, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded: + At 7:02 AM + 2000/10/8, attila! wrote: + + > (a) pick a directory and 'tar -zxf snapshot-2531.tar.gz' + > + > (b) 'cd snapshot-2531' + + Three things: + + 1. You don't tell people where to get the postfix so

a.out binaries die in -current recently

2000-10-08 Thread Mark Hittinger
For the past couple of days the old style binaries don't work under -current, they simply core. FYI Mark Hittinger Earthlink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread Brad Knowles
At 2:31 PM -0500 2000/10/8, Will Andrews wrote: > Heh.. Wietse uses so-called ``experimental'' Postfix on his systems. > And there are *LOTS* of people who think that whatever Wietse runs is > good enough for them.. so this statement had better be hased on personal > experience about the actu

Re: cvs servers load

2000-10-08 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 11:27:13AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Time to put the cvsup servers on the map with ICBM coordinates > > maybe? > > The US CVSup mirrors are listed by state in the FreeBSD Handbook at >

Re: Recent kernels won't boot

2000-10-08 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, At 02:27 +0900 9/10/00, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: >I think ACPI is not related with this problem, it was simply >kernel size ( >4MB) for me. I removed some device drivers and options >from my kernel config then the problem was solved. That was it. Is the 4MB kernel size limit documented anywhe

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:14:14PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > 2. You mention the use of snapshots, but this is not > recommended practice for sites new to postfix. Instead, > start with the most recent "release" version, e.g., >

Re: cvs servers load

2000-10-08 Thread jdp
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Time to put the cvsup servers on the map with ICBM coordinates > maybe? The US CVSup mirrors are listed by state in the FreeBSD Handbook at http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-MIRRORS Physical location of

Re: cvs servers load

2000-10-08 Thread jdp
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where is cvsup8? I get the fastest ping times to it. A traceroute > implies it is also in Seatle, WA. Yes, it's in Seattle too. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"

Re: Recent kernels won't boot

2000-10-08 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 03:30:25PM +0100, Bob Bishop scribbled: > | Kernels built from recent cvsup (<24 hrs) quit immediately on boot, back to > | the BIOS, no messages no nothin'. > > Try removing the ACPI options in kernel and apply Mike Smith's latest > ACPI megapatches. Please also includ

Re: make installkernel broken by recent manpage changes

2000-10-08 Thread David O'Brien
> ===> joy > install -C -c -o root -g wheel -m 555 joy.ko /boot/kernel > install -C -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 joy.8.gz /usr/share/man/man8 > install: joy.8.gz: No such file or directory > *** Error code 71 Since the manpages are being moved elsewhere, I went ahead and removed them from the Ma

WOW!!! Highest Payouts Around!!!!!!!!

2000-10-08 Thread bubblehead32
Its just like being there. Go to www.goldendeckcasino.com/goldendeckcasino/links/2769.html. If you would like to be removed from these mailings in the future please mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=remove To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the

re: sio problems?

2000-10-08 Thread Mike Meyer
attila! writes: > on Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:03:12 -0500 (CDT), Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I recently got my digital camera back out, and started pulling the old > > pictures from it. I noticed something I hadn't ever seen before - silo > > overflows from the sio port. At the moment, I'm

current.freebsd.org FTP wedged

2000-10-08 Thread Forrest Aldrich
FYI, you get the FTP login prompt, but it hangs thereafter. Looks like something is wedged. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: ahc-related panics

2000-10-08 Thread The Hermit Hacker
try the newest cvsup sources ... justin just committed a change that allowed me to get through a 'make buildworld' over here, where I was getting the error listed before previous to it ... On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Bob Bishop wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting repeatable panics with -current, related to a

Re: make installkernel broken by recent manpage changes

2000-10-08 Thread Wesley Morgan
Since we are on the subject of installing kernels, i noticed last night that the target "make kernel-install" (not part of world) will cause your modules to be moved into modules.old. It looks like the routine that moved the kernel -> kernel.old was not changed or something like that. Or maybe thi

Re: very high CPU time demand from process #10 ('idle')

2000-10-08 Thread Brian F. Feldman
attila! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is process 10? Is this literally a representation of > the CPU idle time accumulation for the 85 hours since > boot? Yes. > Despite the enormous time burn on 'idle' it does not show > on 'top'. That's probably because top(1) hides stuff from

Re: Puzzling 'ps aux' output

2000-10-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Dampure, Pierre Y. wrote: > Just noticed that some of the processes running on my system (-current > as of Oct 2) seem to report a startup time in UTC rather than local time > (see attached). Is this normal behaviour? Yes, everything started before adjkerntz has the wrong tim

Latest ACPI megapatch update

2000-10-08 Thread Mike Smith
http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/acpica-bsd-20001008.tar.gz New in this patch: - Fixes for the EC code (error handling) - Fixes for power/sleep button handling (should work for both control method and fixed buttons) - Host:PCI bridges are now detected and attached using ACPI rather

ahc-related panics

2000-10-08 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, I'm getting repeatable panics with -current, related to ahc. I'm seeing lots of ahc:0:A:0: ahc_intr - referenced scb not valid during seqint 0x71 scb(nn) WARNING no cammand for scb nn (cmdcmplt) plus the WARNING without the other message. Eventually it panics with a kernel-mode page fault,

Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail

2000-10-08 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
Well, it only took 17 hours. :) I tried my best to be careful but I'm sure there are some ports that broke as a result, so please be gentle! By the way, if you are expecting CVS to suddenly run faster, don't be disappointed by it running as slow as ever. The speedup will only come when the Atti

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread Brad Knowles
At 7:02 AM + 2000/10/8, attila! wrote: > (a) pick a directory and 'tar -zxf snapshot-2531.tar.gz' > > (b) 'cd snapshot-2531' Three things: 1. You don't tell people where to get the postfix software. Start with

Puzzling 'ps aux' output

2000-10-08 Thread Dampure, Pierre Y.
Just noticed that some of the processes running on my system (-current as of Oct 2) seem to report a startup time in UTC rather than local time (see attached). Is this normal behaviour? [(dampurep)~]: uptime 10:54AM up 41 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.05, 0.01 [(dampurep)~]: uname -a F

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg & port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:02:12AM +, attila! wrote: [snip] > > (o) CAUTION: 'make world' reinstalls 'sendmail' even when > > NO_SENDMAIL=YES # do not build sendmail and related programs > > is included in '/etc/make.conf'; 'make world' may not > compile sendmail, but

re: sio problems?

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
on Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:03:12 -0500 (CDT), Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I recently got my digital camera back out, and started pulling the old > pictures from it. I noticed something I hadn't ever seen before - silo > overflows from the sio port. At the moment, I'm wondering if this is a

very high CPU time demand from process #10 ('idle')

2000-10-08 Thread attila!
-- ps -ax -- 0 ?? DLs0:00.40 (swapper) 1 ?? ILs0:00.07 /sbin/init -- 2 ?? DL 0:04.23 (pagedaemon) 3 ?? DL 0:00.65 (vmdaemon) 4 ?? DL 0:00.70 (bufdaemon) 5 ?? DL 0:44.85 (syncer) 10 ?? RL 4986:29.70 (idle) 11 ?? WL