On 11/27/22 11:13 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022, James Gritton wrote:
On 2022-11-25 15:17, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
bz@ has encouraged me to fiddle with the nfsd
so that it works in a vnet jail.
I have now basically done so, specifically for
NFSv4, since NFSv3 presents various
Several years ago (OK, maybe 12 years ago) I did an experiment where I
unpacked a
freebsd 1.1 (or maybe 2.0?) image into a subdirectory, and after
installing various
compat packagesand options and a.out support and changing MAX_PID to
be 6, I was able to
chroot to it and do a "make world".
On 9/28/21 9:15 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:48 AM Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
^^^
re-guid the pool on first boot.
Isnt the proper place to solve this lack of Unique UUID creation
in the tool(s) that are creating the zfs pool in the first place.
F
On 1/9/20 2:53 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On 1/7/20 3:02 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
Someone once told me they were working on a netgraph node that did TLS
encapsulation of a stream.
I can not remember who it was, but I do remember they were dubious
about being allowed to give
On 11/20/19 12:02 PM, bob prohaska wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:18:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:39 AM bob prohaska wrote:
From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
an older, well-behaved revision.
Is there a mechanism for identifying
On 11/20/19 2:37 PM, bob prohaska wrote:
While compiling a kernel at r354909 using a system at
r354845 the serial console flooded with messages of the
form
g_vfs_done():ufs/rootfs[WRITE(offset=266534912, length=32768)]error = 5
occasionally interspersed with
mmcsd0: Error indicated: 1 Timeout
g
On 11/20/19 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
Bob P. wrote for an aarch64 context:
From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to
an older, well-behaved revision.
Is there a mechanism for identifying revision numbers that
will at least compile and boot, by date?
In my case build
On 10/8/19 4:22 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
I haven't found any good references on the subject, but here's my understanding:
- epoch_enter() and epoch_exit() are very inexpensive operations
(cheaper than mtx, rw_lock or rm_lock operations) that are use to mark
read-only critical sections
- epoch_wait(
reeBSD+13-current&arch=default&format=html
Walter
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:37 PM Julian Elischer <mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
Is there a paper or good description of the epoch concept? (more
readable than epoch(9)).
Haven't be
the idea originated.
Walter
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:37 PM Julian Elischer
mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
> Is there a paper or good description of the epoch concept? (more
> readable than epoch(9)).
> Haven't been to enough BSD confs
Is there a paper or good description of the epoch concept? (more
readable than epoch(9)).
Haven't been to enough BSD confs recently.
julian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsub
what's an ifunc?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I will only discuss ipfw.. I dont' use pf.
On 18/10/18 11:33 am, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Wanting to get a head start on using 12.0 and vnet jails with in
jail firewall.
1. Will Vimage be compiled as a module in the 12.0 kernel and be
included in the base system release?
it's in base.. not a mod
Apparently if you publish an Azure image to their marketplace, they
blindly store billing information at location 65536 of the VHD file..
so you need to ensure that your first partitions start after that.
if you use a layout with your first partition starting at 64 sectors
in, this location falls
On 25/7/18 12:40 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 22/7/18 4:32 am, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 21 Jul 2018, at 21:11, Yuri Pankov wrote:
Yuri Pankov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
...
anyone know if there is a clang equivalent of -Wp, -E,-lang-asm?
In later GCC versions the cpp's -lang-asm
On 22/7/18 3:11 am, Yuri Pankov wrote:
Yuri Pankov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
I would really like ot get some pointers as to who are our tools
committers at the moment, in particular who might know about these
issues.
The main issue for me at the moment is the ability to compile the
aesni
On 22/7/18 4:32 am, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 21 Jul 2018, at 21:11, Yuri Pankov wrote:
Yuri Pankov wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
...
anyone know if there is a clang equivalent of -Wp, -E,-lang-asm?
In later GCC versions the cpp's -lang-asm seems to be deprecated in
favor of -x asse
I would really like ot get some pointers as to who are our tools
committers at the moment, in particular who might know about these issues.
The main issue for me at the moment is the ability to compile the
aesni code in Samba from clang..
Julian
On 20/7/18 7:32 pm, Julian Elischer wrote
compiling our samba with gcc 4.2.1 in 12 gave us some off behaviour
when lld became the linker I think..
1/ linking needed some directories added to some of the build scripts
because previously apparently it looked in $SYSROOT/usr/lib by default
and now it doesn't.
2/ compiling our samba pro
On 14/6/18 4:46 am, Michael Jung wrote:
On 2018-06-13 15:27, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 14:29 -0400, Michael Jung wrote:
Hi!
I just tried updating current from r326073 -> r334996 and when
I try 'geli attach' I get the following error:
# geli attach -p -k mykey.key /dev/gpt/da14
g
On 29/5/18 9:53 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:53, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 05/29/18 13:20, Andriy Gapon wrote:
(kgdb) p *$4.lh_first->c_links.le.le_next
$6 = {
c_links = {
le = {
le_next = 0x0,
le_prev = 0xfe0003999f98
Where does the le_prev point?
back trace at: http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/bob-crash.png
If anyone wants to take a look..
In the exit syscall, while deallocating a vm object.
I haven't see references to a similar crash in the last 10 days or
so.. But if it rings any bells...
__
On 22/4/18 9:43 pm, Rick Macklem wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:30:55PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 07:21:58PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
I decided to start a new thread on current related to SCHED_ULE, since I se
On 22/4/18 10:36 pm, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:30:55PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 07:21:58PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
I decided to start a new thread on current related to SCHED_ULE, since
On 22/4/18 10:36 pm, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:30:55PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 07:21:58PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
I decided to start a new thread on current related to SCHED_ULE, since
On 16/4/18 6:37 pm, Julian Elischer wrote:
Windows users seem to have an almost unlimited number of groups and
soem places seem to use them a LOT.
This gives Posix systems problems with deciding how to handle them
all. Especially when getting
user credentials from winbindd (samba).
Does
On 11/4/18 8:29 am, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
I am having a compile time issue for a patched that compiled fine on my
r329294 system, but now failes to compile with what looks like a wrong
header being included.
You may find it helpful to do something like:
make -dv -C
Windows users seem to have an almost unlimited number of groups and
soem places seem to use them a LOT.
This gives Posix systems problems with deciding how to handle them
all. Especially when getting
user credentials from winbindd (samba).
Does anyone know of any work done to either bypass this
On 8/4/18 10:48 pm, Kyle Evans wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:53 AM, Peter Holm wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:36:08AM -0700, Michael Dexter wrote:
On 3/24/18 2:35 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Writing out memory (md) backed images of UFS2 filesystems (NanoBSD images,
created via
the classical
Anyone seen these recently?
I just got the following:
panic: deadlkres: possible deadlock detected for (address) blocked
for (big number) ticks
anyone seen similar on very new (yesterday) -current GENERIC. ?
there was a prior message that may or may not be related:
newnfs: server pid741@g
running on *some* Dell servers the serial console looks messed up at
the time of the FreeBSD menu.
it looks like it's dropping (or adding? but that's less likely)
characters.
| 5. [K]ernel: kernel (1 of 2) | .- . -.
| 6. Configure Boot [O]ptions... |2
anyone interested in ctime, tzset, and localtime.c please look
athttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D14608
comments and improvements welcome.
Julian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
rds.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:01:33 +0800
Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi,〓 I have a very small request to those committing into head.
If you commit a fix, then if it is possible to easily do so, can you
give the revision number in which the regression was introduced?
like "this was〓 broken
Hi, I have a very small request to those committing into head.
If you commit a fix, then if it is possible to easily do so, can you
give the revision number in which the regression was introduced?
like "this was broken in r329xxx"
this allows people who are looking for specific problems to
On 10/2/18 2:48 am, Warner Losh wrote:
OK. That makes sense again.
I've pushed two changes (r329064 and r329075) which should correct this.
thanks.. I was just about to go investigate this as I noticed my build
last week had no timezone info.
Warner
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Dav
On 19/2/18 4:33 am, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:15:24PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
A> On 18/02/2018 15:26, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > My only point is that it is a performance improvement. IMHO that's enough
:)
A>
A> I don't think that passing an invalid argument to a document
On 16/12/17 2:39 am, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Put the following into /etc/src.conf:
This brings up two questions:
when to use make.conf and when to use src.conf,
and..
WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes
WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES=yes
WITHOUT_TESTS=yes
which of the following is correct and why?
WITH_DEBUG_FI
On 10/10/17 8:33 pm, Rick Macklem wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
[stuff snipped]
On 10/10/17 4:25 am, Rick Macklem wrote:
--> As such, having a fixed reasonable # of threads is probably the best
that can be done.
- The current patch has the # of threads as a sysctl wit
On 10/10/17 4:25 am, Rick Macklem wrote:
Ian Lepore wrote:
[stuff snipped]
taskqueue(9) is an existing mechanism to enqueue functions to execute
asynch using a pool of threads, but it doesn't answer the scalability
questions. In fact it may make them har
On 4/10/17 12:56 am, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 00:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Our 10.4 system is using gcc (for now).
when we compile the devel/binutils port, we get a failure with a
bunch
of these errors:
`_ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_110Stub_tableILi64ELb1EEE' referenced in se
Our 10.4 system is using gcc (for now).
when we compile the devel/binutils port, we get a failure with a bunch
of these errors:
`_ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_110Stub_tableILi64ELb1EEE' referenced in section
`.rodata' of aarch64.o: defined in discarded section
`.rodata._ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_110Stub_tableIL
On 13/9/17 1:16 am, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
On 12 Sep 2017, at 14:38, Julian Elischer wrote:
“这是一个测试多字符文件名长度的文件目的是命名一个文件用中文或者日文或者韩文字符并且要求字符长度超过八十五个字符然后拷贝该文件到我们的共享文件夹看看是否能够拷贝该文件到我.txt”
(I have no idea what that says but apparently it's a real filename
from a windows machine that blew up
On 12/9/17 2:17 pm, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
maybe we could get it into -current.
It'd be silly to have to have people re-inventing hte wheel all the time.
How about you put those changes into the reviews.freebsd.org and we can get
some ge
On 9/9/17 1:28 am, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Has anyone using freeBSD ever increased NAME_MAX (filename maximum length)
and have any experience with it?
We ($JOB) would recompile the entire system so intra-system compatibility
would probably
Has anyone using freeBSD ever increased NAME_MAX (filename maximum
length) and have any experience with it?
We ($JOB) would recompile the entire system so intra-system
compatibility would probably be ok, and we have our own filesystem
which would support it.
But I wonder if anyone has tried
On 19/8/17 11:15 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
at $JOB there are clients where 32bits is starting to chafe.
Has anyone expanded them?
Other than a few offline comments I haven't heard anyone directly
respond to this.
Does anyone have any comments on feasibility or suggestions?
NFSV3
On an AZURE system there is a "local" device that is useful as swap.
It is, I believe, faster than regular network based storage, but it is
ephemeral, and may go away during a shutdown.
It is in some machines a bit small so we'd like to add a bit more for
safety.
But we would like the ephemeral
I have the following (Azure) device (disk) id:
dev.storvsc..%pnpinfo: classid=32412632-86cb-44a2-9b5c-50d1417354f5
deviceid=-0001-8899--
the question is: "how can I map that do /dev/da1"..
I know that for my device it IS /dev/da1
but how can I prove it? there are so ma
at $JOB there are clients where 32bits is starting to chafe.
Has anyone expanded them?
This is starting to become a serious limitation in some places.
Especially large institutions with Samba active.
Samba uses a map between SIDs (session IDs) and UIDS, but it's a
sparse map and due to vario
On 4/6/17 7:07 pm, blubee blubeeme wrote:
Hello
Is there anyone on either of these lists that have experience with both
linux low level data structures and their equivalents on FreeBSD?
For instance the linux header file:
which includes the header file:
Then looking at that file:
You
On 4/6/17 4:59 am, Colin Percival wrote:
On January 24, 1998, in what was later renumbered to SVN r32724, dyson@
wrote:
Add better support for larger I/O clusters, including larger physical
I/O. The support is not mature yet, and some of the underlying implementation
needs help. However, suppo
On 23/5/17 12:13 am, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2017-05-22 03:50, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 22/5/17 2:20 pm, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2017-05-18 22:28, Julian Elischer wrote:
So after stripping out the HPN version of ssh from our product becasue
"it was no longer needed" we dicovered th
On 21/5/17 8:57 pm, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
No the problem left is documentations available in share/doc.
I would like to push them elsewhere. Those documents are mostly useful for
historical reason (hence we want to keep them) but not really for daily use of
modern FreeBSD.
On 22/5/17 2:20 pm, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2017-05-18 22:28, Julian Elischer wrote:
So after stripping out the HPN version of ssh from our product becasue
"it was no longer needed" we dicovered that we were premature in doing so.
Apparently ssh still really needs HPN to get any through
So after stripping out the HPN version of ssh from our product becasue
"it was no longer needed" we dicovered that we were premature in doing so.
Apparently ssh still really needs HPN to get any throughput at all when
there are latencies involved.
For example, with HPN we get 13MB/sec between th
On 7/5/17 1:45 pm, Warner Losh wrote:
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 6/5/17 4:01 am, Toomas Soome wrote:
On 5. mai 2017, at 22:07, Julian Elischer mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
Subject says it all really, is this an option at this time?
we'd
On 6/5/17 4:01 am, Toomas Soome wrote:
On 5. mai 2017, at 22:07, Julian Elischer <mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
Subject says it all really, is this an option at this time?
we'd like to try boot the main zfs root partition and then fall
back to a small UFS based recovery
Subject says it all really, is this an option at this time?
we'd like to try boot the main zfs root partition and then fall back
to a small UFS based recovery partition.. is that possible?
I know we could use grub but I'd prefer keep it in the family.
___
On 13/4/17 5:45 am, Rick Macklem wrote:
I have just committed a patch to head (r316745) which should fix this.
(It includes code to handle the recent change to head to make the pageouts
write through the buffer cache.)
It will be MFC'd and should be in 11.1.
is there any relevance of this ch
On 3/3/17 8:31 am, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2017-Mar-02 22:29:46 +0300, Subbsd wrote:
During some interval after strip call, du will show 512B for any file.
If execute du(1) after strip(1) without delay, this behavior is reproduced 100%:
an interesting point to discuss? is our behaviour in this test right?
from: "austin-group mailng list (posix standard discussion)"
-- rest of email is quoted ---
On 5/3/17 5:48 am, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2017-03-04 13:14:08 +, Danny Niu:
Hi all.
I couldn't remember where I sa
On 2/3/17 8:58 pm, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2 Mar 2017, at 12:02, Mingo Rrubioer wrote:
I would like to see how well FreeBSD does as a workstation OS in the
HPC world due to its stability and reliability, as well as LLVM/clang.
I would like to know if FreeBSD has something similar to Gentoo's
/
On 18/2/17 2:48 am, Andriy Gapon wrote:
First, an example, three consecutive entries for the same thread (from top to
bottom):
KTRGRAPH group:"thread", id:"zio_write_intr_3 tid 100260", state:"sleep",
attributes: prio:84, wmesg:"-", lockname:"(null)"
KTRGRAPH group:"thread", id:"zio_write_intr_3
Tracked this down to a rogue copy of libc.so in an unexpected place
which was being found earlier than the real one.
On 30/1/17 1:13 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi
the linker script /usr/lib/libc.so fails when you are using the
--sysroot options because it
contains absolute paths.
Does
Hi
the linker script /usr/lib/libc.so fails when you are using the
--sysroot options because it
contains absolute paths.
Does anyone know if there is a way to add the sysroot to the script?
currently teh on ein our sysroot looks like:
$ cat /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_FBSD1X_gcc4.2.4/us
On 28/1/17 1:35 am, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2017-01-27 12:33, Shawn Webb wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:30:17PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2017-01-27 12:05, Warner Losh wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Toomas Soome wrote:
On 27. jaan 2017, at 1:40, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)
wrote:
On 28/1/17 4:16 am, Ngie Cooper wrote:
On Jan 27, 2017, at 09:05, Warner Losh wrote:
...
I'm curious why you can't find the space for a bigger partition?
Almost all drives these days are partitioned with a little wasted
space, and that wasted space should be more than enough to cover us
here.
On 22/01/2017 4:51 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:13:49 +0100
Mateusz Guzik schrieb:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 08:45:55PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
The most recent CURRENT panics spontanously and crashes with the error message:
Panic String: __lockmgr_args: unknown lockmgr re
On 19/01/2017 11:18 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 19/01/2017 1:37 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 18 Jan, 2017, at 10:35, Julian Elischer
wrote:
On 17/01/2017 1:23 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 16 Jan, 2017, at 9:25, Baptiste Daroussin
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:03:08AM +0800
On 19/01/2017 1:37 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 18 Jan, 2017, at 10:35, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 17/01/2017 1:23 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 16 Jan, 2017, at 9:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:03:08AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
I noticed that suddenly vim is
On 18/01/2017 5:03 PM, Raimund Sacherer wrote:
I have to put mouse=v to get the behavior I am used to.
Best
doesn't really work for me.
vim is still taking mouse events
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 17/01/2017 1:23 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 16 Jan, 2017, at 9:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:03:08AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
I noticed that suddenly vim is grabbing mouse movements, which makes life
really hard.
Was there a specific revision that brought
ailer client, sorry for tofu and html scrap
On 15/01/2017, 22:48 Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:03:08AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I noticed that suddenly vim is grabbing mouse movements, which
makes
> life really hard.
>
> Was there a speci
I noticed that suddenly vim is grabbing mouse movements, which makes
life really hard.
Was there a specific revision that brought in this change, and can it
be removed?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
On 15/01/2017 10:11 AM, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
Hi all,
since 2 or 3 weeks ago, I noticed that my old Penryn-based Intel Pentium
T4200 notebook lagged a lot. System time was running a lot slower,
sometimes even looked like it freezed. Keystroke
Hi
I'm looking for recent information regarding profiling and tuning in
FreeBSD.
Google has turned up some links but I think that the best leads are
still hiding..
for example I only found
https://wiki.freebsd.org/NetworkPerformanceTuning recently.
(BTW Anyone who has a moment is encourag
=214709
-adrian
On 21 November 2016 at 07:54, Julian Elischer wrote:
example on freefall (FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r306376)
julian@freefall:tput setaf 4|od -c
000 033 [ m
003
so nothing happens, and tput returns 1.
but on a FreeBSD 8 system:
[jelischer@alpha ~]$ tput setaf 4
-adrian
On 21 November 2016 at 07:54, Julian Elischer wrote:
example on freefall (FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r306376)
julian@freefall:tput setaf 4|od -c
000 033 [ m
003
so nothing happens, and tput returns 1.
but on a FreeBSD 8 system:
[jelischer@alpha ~]$ tput setaf 4|od -c
example on freefall (FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r306376)
julian@freefall:tput setaf 4|od -c
000 033 [ m
003
so nothing happens, and tput returns 1.
but on a FreeBSD 8 system:
[jelischer@alpha ~]$ tput setaf 4|od -c
000 033 [ 3 4 m
005
which make the text change
Does this ring any bells?
even a theory would be a big improvement.
memcpy+0xc
mpt_read_cfg_page+0xcc
mpt_cation+0x148e
xpt_action_default+0x7e
cam_periph_runccb+0x7c
passdoioctl+0x719
passioctl+0x30
devfs_ioctl_f+0x7c
kern_ioctl+0x1a8
sys_ioctl+0x11f
amd64_syscall+0x3f9
xfast_syscall+0xf7
we se
On 3/11/2016 7:46 PM, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:46:39 -0400
Mark Heily wrote:
On Nov 3, 2016 5:30 AM, "Kurt Jaeger" wrote:
Hi!
So I am to take it that no-one has any idea how this stuff works and
how to stub it out?
Or had time to write about it.
--
p...@opsec.eu
On 3/11/2016 10:45 AM, Pete Wright wrote:
On 11/02/2016 19:17, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 26/10/2016 2:27 AM, Eivind Nicolay Evensen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:38:04PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
hi,
For long we are planning to remove GNU rcs from base, after a
failed attempt
So I am to take it that no-one has any idea how this stuff works and
how to stub it out?
On 1/11/2016 7:11 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
01.11.2016 17:53, Julian Elischer пишет:
there are a number of packages that want to link with or use that
data, and you can't always disable it, but
On 26/10/2016 2:27 AM, Eivind Nicolay Evensen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:38:04PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
hi,
For long we are planning to remove GNU rcs from base, after a failed attempt
before FreeBSD 10.0. Let see where we are to be able to remove it from FreeBSD
12.
why shou
FL006726
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue,
1 Nov 2016 17:59:00 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eu...@grosbein.net)
Subject:Re: how to reduce the size of /usr/share/i18n data?
To: Julian Elischer , freebsd
References: <7b036323-aa77-6d41-36b0-4
On 14/10/2016 6:31 PM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:19-0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I attempted to add a second partition to an existing FS pool in FreeBSD 10.3
and the result was a crash..
is there anyone out there with a scratch system (10.3) (or two spare drives)
who can
I attempted to add a second partition to an existing FS pool in
FreeBSD 10.3 and the result was a crash..
is there anyone out there with a scratch system (10.3) (or two spare
drives) who can show me this working?
Does it look familiar to anyone?
The drive 'boot0' is being used as the root dr
Looking through the various release notes I see that one thing thing
that is rarely mentioned is the amount of physical memory supported,
or any tuning that may be required to run more than some amoutn
(should it be necessary to change some table sizes etc.).
If anyone has that information I'm
On 11/08/2016 1:16 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote:
On Aug 10, 2016, at 22:05, O. Hartmann wrote:
I just checked the security scanning outputs of FreeBSD and found this
surprising result:
[...]
Checking for passwordless accounts:
polkitd::565:565::0:0:Polkit Daemon User:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin
puls
On 6/08/2016 11:09 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 02:15:36PM +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Friday, 5 August 2016 at 18:56:33 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
On 05.08.2016 18:44, Mark Martinec wrote:
On 2016-08-05 17:23,
en_US.UTF-8"
sh-3.2$ export LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
sh-3.2$ export LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8"
sh-3.2$ export LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
sh-3.2$ date
Fri Aug 5 12:57:47 AWST 2016
if it IS a bug then yes, file a report with full reproduction steps.
Mark
On 2016-08-04 0
On 4/08/2016 1:18 AM, Lundberg, Johannes wrote:
Hi Alan
Thanks for the reply.
Can I still use the same receiving function for sendmsg/send and tell what
kind of message is coming?
How would I tell if there is an fd attached or not?
Even if I set cmsg_level and cmsg_type it won't let me send i
On 4/08/2016 7:24 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Is it normal/expected/documented that the date(1) command in 11.0
now produces a timestamp in substantially different format
in an "en_US.UTF-8" locale (long names, commas, 12 vs. 24h hour time):
Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 12:50:43 AM CEST
vs:
Thu
I upgraded my VPS machine to today's current, and on reboot I couldn't
get into it by network.
A quick switch to the VNC console showed that it was up but that it
couldn't get out.
The xn interfaces said they were UP but attempts to get out were met
with "network is down".
if I did 'tcpdu
On 13/07/2016 1:14 AM, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:51:52PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm specifically interested in the case of kernel modules that
instantiate new syscalls.
How much support do we have for that? In the one example in our
sources of a kld with a sy
I'm specifically interested in the case of kernel modules that
instantiate new syscalls.
How much support do we have for that? In the one example in our
sources of a kld with a syscall (kgssapi.ko) dtrace seems to find
regular function entrypoints but not the syscall.
root@porridge:/usr/sr
On 8/06/2016 5:13 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 06/07/16 02:23, Rafael Rodrigues Nakano wrote:
Hello,
I tried installing virtualbox from packages, building it from sources,
trying the GENERIC kernel but everytime I can't start the kernel modul
Given the work going on for incremental builds, together with the work
in packaging the base, is it planned that we will be able to rebuild
jut one package at a time?
For example will be be able to rebuild just he openssl-base (or
whatever it is called) package without recompiling everything e
On 30/05/2016 12:33 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
On May 29, 2016, at 8:55 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I was thinking that in order to do this properly the chrooted child should do
all it's fetch requests etc via the non-chrooted parent, but that would have
probably been a bit too compli
On 23/05/2016 4:32 AM, b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:31:08PM +0200, b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 01:24:12PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Crochet has some experimental hooks to install packages onto the system being
built, but this seems to be hitting probl
1 - 100 of 1656 matches
Mail list logo