According to Szilveszter Adam:
> The only remaining issue this far has been that when the Linux RealPlayer
> starts playing a clip, it will always start-stop-start in the beginning and
Last time I started the RealPlayer7, it went fine but I'll have to test it
again as soon as I get my card back
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 10:12:57AM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > What does 'cat /dev/sndstat' say on your system?
>
> Device non configured of course :-(
Hmmm I think I'll have to give up on this one... apart from "it should work"
I cannot think of any more insight just now. Maybe testing i
On Sun, 28 May 2000, Jacob A. Hart wrote:
> I remember the scheduler bug you're talking about. My system feels much
> the same as it did during 4.0-CURRENT when that bug was active. I had a
Scheduling was broken in -current on 2004/04/30 11:33:44 PDT. "nice -20" in
-current does essentially t
Ollivier Robert wrote:
>
> I just upgraded my home machine from 4.0-R to 5.0-CURRENT and have found
> something odd. I have an ISA PnP SB AWE64 in the machine and it is not seen by
> the system at all.
>
-CURRENT kernel built last Thursday recognizes my AWE64 PnP:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD defiant.we
I've made old-style ISA drivers self identifying and got rid of the dreaded
isa_compat.h table. As a consequence, the 'struct isa_driver' stuff has
changed slightly to store the additional data that was in the compat tables
and a new line is required (COMPAT_ISA_DRIVER()) so the driver registers
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> Ollivier Robert wrote:
> >
> > I just upgraded my home machine from 4.0-R to 5.0-CURRENT and have found
> > something odd. I have an ISA PnP SB AWE64 in the machine and it is not seen by
> > the system at all.
> >
>
> -CURRENT k
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Kargl wrote:
> First, the error message:
>
> cc -fpic -DPIC -I/usr/src/lib/libmd -DSHA1_ASM -DELF -DRMD160_ASM -DELF
>-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libmd/i386/rmd160.S -o rmd160.So
> building shared library libmd.so.2
> cc: Internal compiler
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Kargl writes:
: cc: Internal compiler error: program ld got fatal signal 10
:
: *default date=2000.05.23.00.00.00
:
: as specified in my cvsup supfile. The system builds fine
: for all earlier dates that I've tried. I have used the
: following three CFLAGS a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bob Martin writes:
: If you are using an older K6 with more than 32mb of ram, this will
: happen from time to time of it's own accord. I have never taken the time
: to find out why, but if you search the archives, you will find that it
: happens quite a bit.
I'm usi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Wemm writes:
: I've made old-style ISA drivers self identifying and got rid of the dreaded
: isa_compat.h table. As a consequence, the 'struct isa_driver' stuff has
: changed slightly to store the additional data that was in the compat tables
: and a new line
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Cracauer writes:
: Have you tried building and installing the new binutils before
: compiling the rest of the world?
This shouldn't be required for buildworld. If it is, then it is a bug
in the buildworld process. Buildworld makes all the stuff it needs to
I need to setup a machine that will boot FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD.
Assume I have an insane amount of disk space. What's the best way to
accomplish this? Last time I tried it, the partition ID numbers were
all the same, making this difficult if not impossible.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send
>I need to setup a machine that will boot FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD.
>Assume I have an insane amount of disk space. What's the best way to
>accomplish this? Last time I tried it, the partition ID numbers were
>all the same, making this difficult if not impossible.
just a starter: Net
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Cracauer writes:
> : Have you tried building and installing the new binutils before
> : compiling the rest of the world?
>
> This shouldn't be required for buildworld. If it is, then it is a bug
> in the buildwor
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 01:52:24 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I need to setup a machine that will boot FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD.
> >Assume I have an insane amount of disk space. What's the best way to
> >accomplish this? Last time I tried it, the partition ID numbers were
> >all the
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bob Martin writes:
> : If you are using an older K6 with more than 32mb of ram, this will
> : happen from time to time of it's own accord. I have never taken the time
> : to find out why, but if you search the archives, you will find that it
> :
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Cracauer writes:
: I know that it is supposed to do so, I suspect that might not be the
: case here.
I don't think so. It is already using the new ld when it coredumps.
I don't think that having it on the system would change things much.
BTW, if I do a make
Here's the full list. I think something very bad is going on here.
Here's the list from my last build:
i386/usr/lib/libc.so: file not recognized: File truncated
i386/usr/lib/libcalendar.so: file not recognized: File truncated
i386/usr/lib/libcrypt.so: file not recognized: File truncated
i386/usr
I cvsup'ed, make world, rebuild+install kernel, reboot, without
problem. Good work.
I upgraded from Apr 4 -current to May 28 -current
and have devices listed as 'unknown' in dmesg. Everything appears to
function OK.
The serial ports, sio0 and sio1 appear both as sio and unknown.
tomdean
===
I just completed a 'make world' on a -current cvsup'ed yesterday and saw
no errors.
tomdean
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
: I just completed a 'make world' on a -current cvsup'ed yesterday and saw
: no errors.
When was the previous time that you did this? And did you update the
binutils first? It sure would be a MAJOR BUMMER if one needed to
update binutils f
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
> : I just completed a 'make world' on a -current cvsup'ed yesterday and saw
> : no errors.
>
> When was the previous time that you did this? And did you update the
> binutils first? It sure would be a MAJOR BUMMER
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: The ability to do cross builds rules out the need to update binutils
: first. I haven't done any cross-builds since, well, februari, so I'm not
: at all up to date on that front; things may have been broken by then...
I did a complete buil
Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
> : The ability to do cross builds rules out the need to update binutils
> : first. I haven't done any cross-builds since, well, februari, so I'm not
> : at all up to date on that front; things may have been broken by the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Kargl writes:
: I've got 500MB of swap. It is never touched during
: the build. The machine is very lightly loaded (i.e.,
: only "make buildworld" running).
Ditto. I just tried it with root and all the limits set to
unlimited. I had the same problem.
: I
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 01:10:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
> : I just completed a 'make world' on a -current cvsup'ed yesterday and saw
> : no errors.
>
> When was the previous time that you did this? And did you update the
> binutils f
On 28-May-00 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
>: I just completed a 'make world' on a -current cvsup'ed yesterday and saw
>: no errors.
>
> When was the previous time that you did this? And did you update the
> binutils first? It sure would be a MAJO
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John
Baldwin writes:
: I built a new world fine with the new binutils right after all my commits
: in /sys/boot. Also, I built world again with today's sources:
OK. I have the old binutils installed on my system.
: --
: build
Before upgrade:
FreeBSD celebris 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: \
Tue Apr 4 11:47:34 PDT 2000 \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/CELEBRIS-SMP i386
After upgrade:
FreeBSD celebris 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: \
Sun May 28 11:07:09 PDT 2000 \
root@celebris:/usr/src/sy
Sorry for two replies:
I did:
make world
reboot
rebuild+install kernel
reboot
tomdean
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
: make world
: reboot
: rebuild+install kernel
: reboot
OK. I'm trying on my bouncer box now. It is over NFS so it is slow.
Also it is a PPro 180, so that is slow too :-(.
FreeBSD billy-club.village.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CUR
At 10:34 AM -0600 5/28/00, Warner Losh wrote:
>I need to setup a machine that will boot FreeBSD, NetBSD and
>OpenBSD. Assume I have an insane amount of disk space. What's
>the best way to accomplish this? Last time I tried it, the
>partition ID numbers were all the same, making this difficult
>
Hi,
ok so I am having a couple of problems.
The first is that I get tons of "sio0: x more silo overflows" messages when I
boot an SMP enabled kernel under the latest 5.0 source. Well as of friday I
re'cvs-upped.
I can get rid of these by not booting an SMP kernel but then I get really
freak
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes:
: OK. I'm trying on my bouncer box now. It is over NFS so it is slow.
: Also it is a PPro 180, so that is slow too :-(.
:
: FreeBSD billy-club.village.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #33:
: Sun Apr 30 22:57:58 MDT 2000
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Thomas D. Dean" writes:
: and have devices listed as 'unknown' in dmesg. Everything appears to
: function OK.
They are ok.
: The serial ports, sio0 and sio1 appear both as sio and unknown.
Yes. This is expected. The PnP BIOS code which should execute before
al
Did install of new binutils. now ld dumps core ALL the time. Further
testing impossible. DO NOT TRY TO UPGRADE JUST BINUTILS IF YOU ARE
GETTING THE SIGNAL 10 ERROR. YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO BUILD ANYTHING ELSE
ON THE SYSTEM.
Now, I'm grumpy...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 02:30:59PM -0600, Steve Heistand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok so I am having a couple of problems.
>
> The first is that I get tons of "sio0: x more silo overflows" messages when I
> boot an SMP enabled kernel under the latest 5.0 source. Well as of friday I
> re'cvs-upped.
Sa
[ i'm not on -stable, but am on -current ]
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with ftp(1) in passive mode on 4-STABLE and 5-CURRENT:
FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #0: Sat May 27 10:26:43 EDT 2000
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Fri May 26 04:52:03 EDT 2000
<2 5002-0> (18:46:17) [will@radon ~]% ftp ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/p
David,
looks like I found the problem. Or at least how to trivially
recreate the problem and how to work around it for those people that
need to do so. I've cc'd current since I've been talking there with
people about it.
I'm fairly certain that there are malloc related bugs in the new
On Fri, 26 May 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > > GDB 5.0 is released!
> > Do you have any forecasts as to when we will see this baby in the -current?
>
> Its priority is behind GCC 2.96
I haven't had a chance to examine this yet ... do you know if it
includes support for our new hardware debug
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Will Andrews
writes:
> [ i'm not on -stable, but am on -current ]
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having trouble with ftp(1) in passive mode on 4-STABLE and 5-CURRENT:
> FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #0: Sat May 27 10:26:43 EDT 2000
> FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #1: Fri May 26 04:52:03 EDT 200
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 05:12:05PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> I think that this is strong evidence that there are bugs in the new
> binutils that AJ is finding. I think it may be that it incorrectly
> expects memory to be zero'd when it gets it or something.
I've further verified that:
- it's
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 05:53:38PM -0700, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> According to the ftp(1) man page:
>
> Please note that if you are connecting to IPv6 ftp server,
> the program will use EPSV/EPRT pair and LPSV/LPRT pair, in-
> stead of PASV and PORT. The m
(5-28-2000) while
trying to install.
Rather than check the list for a solution, I went back to the 4.0 boot disks
(which worked really well) and changed them to setup a snapshot
(5.0-2528-CURRENT).
If you so desire (which presumably is the case), I can just boot up the
current floppies and t
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 05:12:05PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> I get these failures on hello world:
>
> int main() { printf("hello world\n"); }
>
> cc -c xxx.c
> cc -o xxx xxx.o
>
Can you test this patch? I think I tracked down the problem. At some
point, someone added a new field into a hash
:Hi,
:
:ok so I am having a couple of problems.
:
:The first is that I get tons of "sio0: x more silo overflows" messages when I
:boot an SMP enabled kernel under the latest 5.0 source. Well as of friday I
:re'cvs-upped.
:
:I can get rid of these by not booting an SMP kernel but then I get real
Warner Losh wrote:
> David,
> I'm fairly certain that there are malloc related bugs in the new
> binutils. If I have malloc.conf pointing at AJ, then we die in ld all
> the time. If I remove that file, then we don't and things appear to
> work. That's why some people succeeded in their upgrade,
The patch works for me! Yippie! I have my AJ back again.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 05:05:29AM +, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> You need to apply the patch and remake /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd
> and then /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld .
I'll pass this onto the Binutils people.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 08:32:30PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> If it works, then I think it should be committed in the usual way
> for this stuff: Filtered through David O'Brien...
Give me a few days if you can. (if people think that is unacceptable,
please let me know) I've forwarded the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 08:32:30PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: > If it works, then I think it should be committed in the usual way
: > for this stuff: Filtered through David O'Brien...
:
: Give me a few days if you can. (if people th
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Scheduling was broken in -current on 2004/04/30 11:33:44 PDT. "nice -20" in
> -current does essentially the same thing as "nice -10" in 4.0 (not enough
> even in 4.0).
hmmm... so there's a few years to wait before we have to worry.. :-)
>
> Bruce
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anatoly Vorobey writes:
: Can you test this patch? I think I tracked down the problem. At some
: point, someone added a new field into a hash table struct and didn't
: add initialization for it into the general hash table struct init func.
: This patch cures the prob
53 matches
Mail list logo
