Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

thanks everyone it's working normally now after full buildworld kernel then forced rebuild of all ports from their updated sources --

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On 7/9/23 18:27, void wrote: On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:17:38PM +0100, void wrote: Hi, On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg for anything and this error happens: # pkg install doas The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 17:17:38 +0100 void wrote: > Hi, > > On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) > I try to use pkg for anything and this error > happens: > > # pkg install doas > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and install

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

void wrote: > Hi, > > On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use > pkg for anything and this error > happens: > > # pkg install doas > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y > Bootstrapping p

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:17:38PM +0100, void wrote: > Hi, > > On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg > for anything and this error > happens: > > # pkg install doas > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:17:38PM +0100, void wrote: Hi, On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg for anything and this error happens: # pkg install doas The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now?

Re: Problems with /usr/src/usr.bin/rs/rs.c

> On Nov 25, 2022, at 2:53 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > Hi, > > > this is a problem on 2 CURRENT Maschines. > > Both stop with this: > > cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0 > --sysroot=/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp > -B/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/usr/bin -O2 -pipe -fno-comm

Re: Problems compiling kernel

On 2021-Dec-30, at 13:27, Mark Millard wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> on a system updated yesterday I get >> >> tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git branch >> * main >> tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git pull >> Already up to date. >> tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % uname -a >> FreeBSD head 14.0-CURREN

Re: Problems compiling kernel

> Dear all, > > on a system updated yesterday I get > > tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git branch > * main > tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % git pull > Already up to date. > tuexen_at_head:~/freebsd-src % uname -a > FreeBSD head 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #1 main-n252035-63f7f3921bd: > Thu

Re: Problems compiling kernel

> On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:42, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 08:33:09PM +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote: >>> On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:26, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> >>> This should have been resolved today in >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5e6a2d6eb220d780c9128

Re: Problems compiling kernel

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 08:33:09PM +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote: > > On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:26, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > This should have been resolved today in > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5e6a2d6eb220d780c9128c81b58f133114061415 > I do have that commit locally in the tre

Re: Problems compiling kernel

> On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:26, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > This should have been resolved today in > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5e6a2d6eb220d780c9128c81b58f133114061415 I do have that commit locally in the tree... But I can't build world or kernel. Looking for libc++.so.1 I get tuexen

Re: Problems compiling kernel

This should have been resolved today in https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5e6a2d6eb220d780c9128c81b58f133114061415 -m > On 30. Dec 2021, at 20:17, tue...@freebsd.org wrote: > Dear all, > > on a system updated yesterday I get > > tuexen@head:~/freebsd-src % git branch > * main > tuexen@h

Re: Problems with getting a crash dump

Thanks for the replies! I finally managed to solve the issue. For some reason when I get a panic while i915kms is active I am unable to write `continue` in KDB. Also the KDB prompt was not even displayed so I had no idea that I should write that command. After I added debug.debugger_on_panic=0 to /

Re: Problems in pkg

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 02:01:09PM -0300, Cristian Cardoso wrote: > The problem was actually user nobody, which was deleted from the system. > I recreated and solved the problem. > > Em qua., 10 de nov. de 2021 às 06:36, Baptiste Daroussin > escreveu: > > > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:48:51PM -0

Re: Problems in pkg

The problem was actually user nobody, which was deleted from the system. I recreated and solved the problem. Em qua., 10 de nov. de 2021 às 06:36, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:48:51PM -0300, Cristian Cardoso wrote: > > I'm trying to use pkg to install/update package

Re: Problems in pkg

On 08/11/2021 18:48, Cristian Cardoso wrote: pkg: Unable to drop privileges: No error: 0 pkg: No signature found Cross-reference for FreeBSD 13.0⋯

Re: Problems with getting a crash dump

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 07:08:31PM +, Alexander wrote: > Hello, I am currently using FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT and I found a bug that > triggers a kernel panic. I wanted to make a kernel crash dump to further > investigate the issue, but after a few tries I still did not manage to do it. > I started

Re: Problems with getting a crash dump

On Mon, 08 Nov 2021 19:08:31 + Alexander wrote: > Hello, I am currently using FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT and I found a bug > that triggers a kernel panic. I wanted to make a kernel crash dump to > further investigate the issue, but after a few tries I still did not > manage to do it. I started by f

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

Am 02.05.21 um 01:37 schrieb Greg Rivers: > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 16:45:03 CDT Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: >>> On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC.

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

On Saturday, 1 May 2021 16:45:03 CDT Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: > > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The > >> watchdog timer send a timeout mess

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: >> I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog >> timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show >> only this

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog > timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show > only this message: > Switch to the official Realtek driver in ports: net/rea

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

On 01.05.2021 21.09, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: Hi all I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show only this message: May 1 14:24:18 valfenda kernel: re0: watchdog timeout May 1 14:24:1

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X [solved]

On 4/14/21 5:16 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: On 4/14/21 4:27 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" When I start webcamd with this, return a LONG list of other variables and webcamd not run. Is it right? Try: "-m uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" It's w

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 4:27 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" When I start webcamd with this, return a LONG list of other variables and webcamd not run. Is it right? Try: "-m uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" --HPS ___ freebsd-current@

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > Hi, > > The following thread suggests using a UVC quirk: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-uvc/mailman/linux-uvc-devel/?viewmonth=202102 > > Translated to webcamd parameters, it becomes: > > "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" When I start webcamd with this, return a LONG list of other

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 4:15 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The last version tha I Know that work need libhal, Just do "make config" and de-select HAL support, before building. Webcamd doesn't need it. --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://li

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:41 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > Hi, > :< - CUT - >: > Does downgrading webcamd to an older version make it work again? > > I probably need to search for that error message. Maybe it is a known > issue already fixed. So far it looks like a proble

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

Hi, The following thread suggests using a UVC quirk: https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-uvc/mailman/linux-uvc-devel/?viewmonth=202102 Translated to webcamd parameters, it becomes: "-s uvc_driver.quirks=0x100" Can you try that? --HPS ___ freebsd-curren

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > Hi, > > On 4/14/21 1:10 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > root@valfenda:/usr/ports/multimedia/webcamd # webcamd -d ugem1.3 -m > > uvc_driver.trace=1 > ^^^ ugem -> ugen > > ugen was spelled wrong. Ops .. Sorry. output root@val

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

Hi, On 4/14/21 1:10 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: root@valfenda:/usr/ports/multimedia/webcamd # webcamd -d ugem1.3 -m uvc_driver.trace=1 ^^^ ugem -> ugen ugen was spelled wrong. --HPS ___ fr

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> > >> On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >>> 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 > >>> SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 > >>> 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 > >>> DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 >

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 3:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 :< CUT >: Hi, I see

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 > > SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 > > 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 > > DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 :< CUT >: > > Hi, > > I see data is received, so f

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 3:10 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The webcamd create two devices ( /dev/video{0,1} ) and the pwcview open the window, but not show image, onle a green screen, but the webcam active LED turn on. But in my old instalation

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 > > SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 > > 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 > > DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 > > 22:03:30.876112 usbus1.3 > > SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > The webcamd create two devices ( /dev/video{0,1} ) and the pwcview open > > the window, but not show image, onle a green screen, but the webcam active > > LED turn on. But in my old instalations ( 13-Current (Nov or Dec of 2019 )

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 3:05 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: 22:03:30.860068 usbus1.3 SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 22:03:30.860079 usbus1.3 DONE-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=13608,IVAL=0,ERR=0 22:03:30.876112 usbus1.3 SUBM-ISOC-EP=0081,SPD=HIGH,NFR=128,SLEN=0,IVAL=0 22:03:3

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > On 4/14/21 2:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > > ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH > > (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA) > > Hi, > > This webcam is connected VIA USB2.0 protocols only. No USB 3.x involved. I try to connect in 2.0, 3.0 and 3.1 ports, and nothing worked. > > Unstab

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The webcamd create two devices ( /dev/video{0,1} ) and the pwcview open the window, but not show image, onle a green screen, but the webcam active LED turn on. You should only use the first of the two devices. The second device is for meta

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 2:49 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA) Hi, This webcam is connected VIA USB2.0 protocols only. No USB 3.x involved. Unstable picture may indicate a bandwidth problem. You can also compile webcamd with debugging and r

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

> > > > On 4/13/21 8:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> ?? The USB 3.1 not was reconise by FreeBSD. > >> > >> ?? when I create a meet in Jitsi, the webcam show image, but its seens > >> like loose horizontal and vertical sync. > > > > What do

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/13/21 8:14 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote:   The USB 3.1 not was reconise by FreeBSD.   when I create a meet in Jitsi, the webcam show image, but its seens like loose horizontal and vertical sync. What does usbconfig say about the webcam? A

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: unregister: mixer busy Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: Waiting for sound application to exit! Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: unregister: mixer busy Apr 13 20:28:43 valfenda kernel: pcm6: Waiting for

Re: Problems with Webcam and USB 3.X

On 4/14/21 1:38 AM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: The USB 3.1 not was reconise by FreeBSD. when I create a meet in Jitsi, the webcam show image, but its seens like loose horizontal and vertical sync. What does usbconfig say about the webcam? Any errors in dmesg? --HPS ___

Re: Problems with AMDGPU and two grafic cards

Hi Pete,  did BIOS update,  has been critical.  in the meantime with lot o'luck I got the scfb-driver to work but only in 1024x76 (but the bios-logo starting in 1920x1280) and with 'dbus-launch kstart5 plasmashell' I have a root-login to plasmashell.  I guess I can add further video-modes to the

Re: Problems with AMDGPU and two grafic cards

On 10/18/19 3:07 PM, mms.vanbreukelin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pete, did BIOS update,  has been critical.  in the meantime with lot o'luck I got the scfb-driver to work but only in 1024x76 (but the bios-logo starting in 1920x1280) and with 'dbus-launch kstart5 plasmashell' I have a root-login

Re: Problems upgrading -current with pkgbase

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:46 PM Kyle Evans wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:37 AM Andreas Nilsson > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to upgrade my -current with pkgbase, using boot environments: > > $ bectl list > > BE Active Mountpoint Space Created > > 13C-20190902 NR /

Re: Problems upgrading -current with pkgbase

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:37 AM Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to upgrade my -current with pkgbase, using boot environments: > $ bectl list > BE Active Mountpoint Space Created > 13C-20190902 NR / 72.3G 2019-09-02 13:43 > 13C-20190916 - /tmp/be_mount.J

Re: problems on lists.freebsd.org error 503 backend fetch failed

Hi! > Hi, if there's a better place to report this then please advise cluster...@freebsd.org or postmas...@freebsd.org -- they are informed about it already. > It seems the web-mail-list software for FreeBSD has failed partially (mostly?) It's the load-balancer in front of the mailman instance

Re: problems with mouse

Dear folks, I am not sure if hald_enable="YES" is still needed, but I will add it to see if the mouse problem goes away, because mouse works, but when I switch apps, ie. firefox to xterm, then I cannot switch back to firefox till I finish with xterm :(. If it works well and fixes the problem, I w

Re: problems with mouse

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/29/16 22:12, Antonio Olivares wrote: I apologize in advance if this is not in the right list, if I need to pose this question in questions, I will do so as soon as I find out. I am having trouble with switching apps in Lumina desktop with t

Re: problems with mouse

I do not know what could be the problem, but if I restart the machine, I get the functionality back. I use the scroll ability and learned to cut and paste using xterm only. It is then when I lose the functionality. I right click and or left-click and I cannot switch from browser to xterm. I hav

Re: problems with mouse

On 08/29/16 22:12, Antonio Olivares wrote: Dear folks, I apologize in advance if this is not in the right list, if I need to pose this question in questions, I will do so as soon as I find out. I am having trouble with switching apps in Lumina desktop with the mouse, I removed moused from /etc/r

Re: Problems with building rescue are solved

On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 19:37+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > Hi, > > I guess both the instructions for enabling DTrace, > https://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/KernelSupport and r284356 are to > blame. > > I suggest the wiki be amended with: > > STRIP=: > > or some other innocuous command like 'echo --

Re: Problems building head, probably r281198

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 06:09:04 -0700 David Wolfskill wrote: > Running: > FreeBSD g1-254.catwhisker.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #25 > r281143M/281144:1100067: Mon Apr 6 08:30:10 PDT 2015 > r...@g1-254.catwhisker.org:/common/S3/obj/usr/src/sy

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

On 2014-08-08 19:23, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Daniel Peyrolon wrote this message on Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 00:41 +0200: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I just would like to gratuitously rant about something that happened on my >> machine. >> >> Basically, I upgraded my zpool to use embedded_data, since it

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

Daniel Peyrolon wrote this message on Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 00:41 +0200: > Hello everyone, > > I just would like to gratuitously rant about something that happened on my > machine. > > Basically, I upgraded my zpool to use embedded_data, since it would be more > efficient, and rebooted. (I install

Re: Problems with zpool upgrade embedded_data, and rebooting

On 2014.08.08 17:41, Daniel Peyrolon wrote: > What would be the better way to avoid this happening in the future? > Always update the bootloader before doing a zpool upgrade on your root pool. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

On 20.07.2014 18:19, Anders Bolt-Evensen wrote: > Hello, everyone! Hi! > When I try to use the radeon driver, X exits because of BIOS errors > (since I do not use BIOS when in EFI mode), as can be seen from the > output of "dmesg -a" from a verbose boot (at the time dmesg -a was run, > I had comm

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

On 23.07.2014 22:18, Lokadamus wrote: > Am 20.07.2014 18:19, schrieb Anders Bolt-Evensen: >> info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 > 1.6.0 20080730 looks old for me. > Have a look at https://wiki.freebsd.org/Graphics section "Installing KMS > Ports" 1.6.0 is the version of the kernel driver,

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

What I did was: Install subversion either from ports or via pkg install Get the newest source code from FreeBSD by running the command svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src (or whatever directory you might choose, I used /usr/src) Then I ran make buildworld from the new /usr/src

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

Am 20.07.2014 18:19, schrieb Anders Bolt-Evensen: Hello, everyone! Last week, I created a custom ISO from the latest -CURRENT sources which contained an EFI image that is bootable on my MacBook Pro. Both installation and booting from this new FreeBSD 11 EFI system goes without any problems. How

Re: Problems starting X on Mac using vesa, radeon or intel drivers when running FreeBSD-CURRENT in EFI

> Last week, I created a custom ISO from the latest -CURRENT sources which > contained an EFI image that is bootable on my MacBook Pro. > Both installation and booting from this new FreeBSD 11 EFI system goes > without any problems. Somewhat off-topic, but can you detail how you did this? I've b

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 24, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Glen Barber wrote: > Trimmed CC a bit. > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:42:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber wrote: >>> I sort of typed what I meant a bit backwards from what I intended to >>> write. What I meant (sort of) is

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Trimmed CC a bit. On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:42:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > > I sort of typed what I meant a bit backwards from what I intended to > > write. What I meant (sort of) is, "I would like to discuss our forward > > thinking on bac

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:42:27PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >>

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:42:27PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > >>> So, I guess that stable/9 can build properly on a st

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >>> So, I guess that stable/9 can build properly on a stable/10 box. >>> For FreeBSD 9.2, there is no easy way out. >> >> You’ll

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > So, I guess that stable/9 can build properly on a stable/10 box. > > For FreeBSD 9.2, there is no easy way out. > > You’ll have to back port the patch then. We don’t guarantee fo

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > OK, I think I see the issue. I looked here: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk?view=log > > and saw that dim@ MFC'd his EARLY_BUILD stuff in r257812. > > That is why you can build stable/9 on a stabl

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Hi, OK, I think I see the issue. I looked here: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk?view=log and saw that dim@ MFC'd his EARLY_BUILD stuff in r257812. That is why you can build stable/9 on a stable/10 host. I am building FreeBSD 9.2 which doesn't have that change. b

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > Which bombing out are you seeing (two or three have been sighted in this > thread)? And is this a nanobsd build, or a straight buildworld? > > When building FreeNAS, with a

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > Which bombing out are you seeing (two or three have been sighted in this > thread)? And is this a nanobsd build, or a straight buildworld? > When building FreeNAS, with a hacked the nanobsd script to does "make make buildworld", and the mak

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 > almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate > the 9 on current case).

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 > almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate > the 9 on current case). I don't see the problem being talked about at all. > As for 9 on 1

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:55:40 -0400, Glen Barber writes: >> make make && make -j8 -DNO_CLEAN buildworld > >This is, IMHO, the worst solution I've heard on this topic so far. I didn't say it was a good solution - but if you want -j you may not have a choice (unless you fix src/Makefile). __

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

>Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the >hell the came into play. > >It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9 >userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I mentioned works. IIRC all the fixes I put into src/Makefile to ensur

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:05:05PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > >Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the > >hell the came into play. > > > >It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9 > >userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' t

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:00:03PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> > >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, > >> unfortunately. This was one of the

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, >> unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which >> was *not* redundant. :-/ > > > War

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On 6/18/14, 4:05 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT host with bmake? You would likel

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, >> unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which >> was *not* redundant. :-/ > > > War

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:59 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 18 Jun 2014, at 01:33, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote: For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, > unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which > was *not* redundant. :-/ Warner, Is there a way to bring back the behavior of r257658 but witho

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On 18 Jun 2014, at 01:33, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote: >>> >>> For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: >>> >>># make make buildworld -jN [...] >>> >>> Note

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:33:11PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > >> > >> For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: > >> > >> # make make buildworld -jN [

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote: >> >> For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: >> >> # make make buildworld -jN [...] >> >> Note the extra 'make', which rather than relying on the bootstrap-

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

>> Why not use fmake in that scenario? > >That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake? So long as it is recent enough to have :tu and :tl I would expect so. >If I typed "make something", is there a way inside the make environment to >detect if bmake or fmake was in

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Sorry, I didn't speak to the problem you hit... On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >> If I build like this: >> >> env TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 make -j 9 SRCCONF=/dev/null >> __MAKE_CONF=/opt/local/branches/freenas/os-base/amd64/make.conf.build >> NO_CLEAN=1 buildworl

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > > For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running: > > # make make buildworld -jN [...] > > Note the extra 'make', which rather than relying on the bootstrap-tools > to determine which make to build, I am specifically telli

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >>> Why not use fmake in that scenario? >> >> That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fma

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > Why not use fmake in that scenario? > > That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake? > If I typed "make something", is there a way inside

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Simon, > > Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to > FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD > 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT > host with bmake? > > I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Craig Rodrigues writes: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: >> >> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >>>Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >>>FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >>>10/stable,

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >>Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >>FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >>10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >>host with b

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >host with bmake? You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in

Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10

Simon, Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD 10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT host with bmake? I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so that I can build ports inside the jail

Re: problems with pkg2ng

On 29/11/2013 02:02, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > in the near past, when I update ports repository via svn, I always use > pkg2ng to upgrade (or update?) the database, but today I can not do it. Uh? pkg2ng is a one time thing. Its only use is when converting a system that had previously used

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >