Reinis Ivanovs wrote:
Hello,
I have a strange HTTP connectivity problem in my LAN. There is a
FreeBSD 7.1 system that runs the httpd, a Vista system that I use to
connect to it, and a Tomato 1.23 WRT54GL router between them. It often
occurs that I can ping the FreeBSD system just fine, but HTTP
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:45:49 -0600, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's
a fast 686, default to a X environment.
I would always encourage using a text mode dialog FIRST. Such
as
Your system is able to run the graphical installer.
Do you want to launch it, or do you want to
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:18:55 +0200, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se
wrote:
As long as you have sufficient RAM (and you don't actually need all that
much of it) running X on an older CPU should not be much of a problem.
(Unless X.org has bloated really badly over the last couple of years.)
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:10:42 +0200
Peter Schuller peter.schul...@infidyne.com wrote:
I recently began testing mergemaster -U since the perpetual review
diff of file I never touched grows annoying real quick.
Unfortunately I recently discovered that it does not seem to do
StumbleUpon | Discover Your Web. Here are this
week's most popular sites recommended by people
like you on StumbleUpon.
Photos http://www.stumbleupon.com/tag/photos/
Videos http://www.stumbleupon.com/tag/videos/
News http://www.stumbleupon.com/tag/news/
Arts
software installation CPU/RAM needs), run the dialog(3) interface. If it's
a fast 686, default to a X environment.
nonsense. please stop this stupid discussion at all.
just use linux or windows (maybe PC-BSD) if it's important for you.
___
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
software installation CPU/RAM needs), run the dialog(3) interface. If
it's
a fast 686, default to a X environment.
nonsense. please stop this stupid discussion at all.
just use linux or windows (maybe
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 02:14:43PM -0700, Christopher Chambers wrote:
Hi,
I have an msdos partition with a large amount of data. Is there a way to
convert to a ufs partition without having to remove the data off the
partition first?
Not that one.
You could use one of the commercial
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
thinking that a software raid5 solution may not be such a bad idea.
software raid5 isn't any more bad than hardware raid5 most cases.
just raid5 is bad if you use it in ANY type of load except:
a) mostly
Everyday, you say something.
You SMS, chat online, and talk to your friends and family.
What if you got rewarded for your say?
More than 156,141 young Malaysians and I have been active in this community and
I thought you would want to check it out.
How does it work?
* Get paid when you take
Everyday, you say something.
You SMS, chat online, and talk to your friends and family.
What if you got rewarded for your say?
More than 156,141 young Malaysians and I have been active in this community and
I thought you would want to check it out.
How does it work?
* Get paid when you take
On Friday I ran the following:
# cd /usr/local/etc/cvsup
# csup -L2 ports-supfile
# csup -L2 doc-supfile
# csup -L2 stable-supfile (tag=RELENG_7)
I then rebuilt the world and installed it. When I rebooted,
I was very pleasantly surprised to find:
% uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rolf G Nielsen
listrea...@lazlarlyricon.com wrote:
And why is a graphical installer needed or even wanted? As several people,
including, I believe, Wojciech, pointed out, it would just make the
installation process slower without adding anything useful to
Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
software installation CPU/RAM needs), run the dialog(3) interface. If
it's
a fast 686, default to a X environment.
nonsense. please stop this stupid discussion at all.
just use linux or
nonsense. please stop this stupid discussion
at all
Agreed. Only add GUI installer if it allows added functionality. Since
text mode can do everything GUI mode can do (with less overhead),
there is absolutely no reason to introduce a GUI installer.
Let's diverge onto discussing functionality
On Sunday 26 April 2009 16:23:58 Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
software installation CPU/RAM needs), run the dialog(3) interface. If
it's
a fast 686, default to a X environment.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:39:09PM -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Leon Meßner
l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.dewrote:
Hi,
i'm having a problem with the disk numbering of RAID arrays (3ware
9650SE). When i boot, the array with my system is always the last
numbered
El día Sunday, April 26, 2009 a las 10:59:07AM -0400, Daniel Underwood escribió:
nonsense. please stop this stupid discussion
at all
Sometimes I'm thinking in blacklist mails based on the Subject line in my
~/.procmailrc file; this thread 'Modern FreeBSD Installer?' for example
would deserve
I didn't say a graphical installer has less functionality. I said it
has no more.
On Sunday, April 26, 2009, beni b...@brinckman.info wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009 16:23:58 Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Wojciech Puchar
snip
I've also thought about the concept of a web-ui installer, even if it's
run
from the local machine. The benefit of a webui installer is that you can
give the disk to someone, tell them to put it up on a publically
available
IP address and just sit back and let it run. but I
This system has been a dual-monitor since before the change-over from
XFree86 to xorg. The change-over resulted in losing dual-monitor
capability, but I've recently taken another shot at it. I knew I'd need
to be patient during the change-over.
Both monitors are presenting the same desktop,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:18:55 +0200, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se
wrote:
Better would be to check (somehow) for the presence of a keyboard and
a screen. If those are not present forget about X. If they are
present then the user at least has a possibility of using X.
Deferring to the
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:06:58 +0200, beni b...@brinckman.info wrote:
Why should a graphical installer have less functionality ?
hasn't been claimed. GUI installer just requires more resources,
more overhead.
And what is wrong
with some eye candy ?
Eye candy is wrong exactly when it reduces
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:28:55 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
I think this is a reasonable approach to the problem of which
installation mode to launch. The default is `user friendly', [...]
No, the default is GUI. That's a big difference because
it entirely depends on
On Sunday 26 April 2009 01:12:48 Tom Worster wrote:
thanks for the tip, mel. i got rid of the ports involved and reinstalled
with WITHOUT_X11=yes and the install was faster and things are a lot
tidier.
i had no idea that i ought to be configuring port builds with env vars. is
there
I've compiled kernel without msdosfs.
When I mount some FAT system msdosfs.ko,msdosfs_iconv.ko,libiconv.ko are
being loaded.
When I unmount this FAT all those .ko modules stay.
'kldunload msdosfs' unloads it ok.
But 'kldunload msdosfs_iconv' hangs OS immediately making it unusable.
My guess is
Just my two cents:
Why a graphical installer? Shure, it looks nice, easy, modern and more
accessable (examples: Mac OS X, Vista), but on the other hand, for me
FreeBSD never was intended to be fancy, but to be functional.
The text mode installer:
- works on every PC, every graphics card,
I have a machine I plan to use solely for testing. I have FreeBSD
8.0-CURRENT on it right now, and would like to add FreeBSD 7.2-RC2 as
well as CentOS 5.3 Linux.
Presently I have three Master Boot Record primary partitions - slices
in the FreeBSD parlance, if I understand correctly:
- A
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Steven Friedrich wrote:
This system has been a dual-monitor since before the change-over from XFree86
to xorg. The change-over resulted in losing dual-monitor capability, but
I've recently taken another shot at it. I knew I'd need to be patient during
the change-over.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr
wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:18:55 +0200, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se
wrote:
Better would be to check (somehow) for the presence of a keyboard and
a screen. If those are not present forget about X. If
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:11:36 +0200, Neo [GC] n...@gothic-chat.de wrote:
Just my two cents:
I may add two Eurocents. :-)
Why a graphical installer? Shure, it looks nice, easy, modern and more
accessable (examples: Mac OS X, Vista), but on the other hand, for me
FreeBSD never was intended
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:52:56 -0400, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
For such reasons , personally , I hate
(1) auto-start installations .
Dangerous. Simply dangerous. Something as important an the
installation of an operating system should not rely on
assumptions and
I got cursed up in heaps on the debian-user list, because I had the gall
to assert that just installing a service shouldn't actually start it
running.
I said that because I had done a full Gnome install on my PowerMac 8500.
What I didn't realize ahead of time was that it was going to install
On Apr 20, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Lisa Casey wrote:
Running FreeBSD 5.3 IN /etc/ntp.conf I have:
server time.nist.gov prefer
server tock.gpsclock.com
Your actual question has already been answered, but I'd like to point
out that people really shouldn't be using those NTP servers unless you
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:19:31 -0700, Michael David Crawford m...@prgmr.com
wrote:
I got cursed up in heaps on the debian-user list, because I had the gall
to assert that just installing a service shouldn't actually start it
running.
Security considerations apply here. As well as should the
On Apr 25, 2009, at 5:10 AM, Peter Schuller wrote:
Unfortunately I recently discovered that it does not seem to do what
you might expect. For example it nuked my mailer.conf on one machine,
and my /etc/namedb/named.conf (!!!) on another machine.
Me, too. I lost exactly those two files during
2009/4/26 Michael David Crawford m...@prgmr.com:
I have a machine I plan to use solely for testing. I have FreeBSD
8.0-CURRENT on it right now, and would like to add FreeBSD 7.2-RC2 as well
as CentOS 5.3 Linux.
Presently I have three Master Boot Record primary partitions - slices in
the
2009/4/25 Christopher Chambers ccha...@interchange.ubc.ca:
Hi,
Is there a guide that talks about how to optimize the kernel memory
resources (kern.ipc.shmmax, etc)?
Like man 7 tuning?
--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Michael David Crawford m...@prgmr.comwrote:
I have a machine I plan to use solely for testing. I have FreeBSD
8.0-CURRENT on it right now, and would like to add FreeBSD 7.2-RC2 as well
as CentOS 5.3 Linux.
Presently I have three Master Boot Record primary
On 4/26/09, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
I've compiled kernel without msdosfs.
When I mount some FAT system msdosfs.ko,msdosfs_iconv.ko,libiconv.ko are
being loaded.
When I unmount this FAT all those .ko modules stay.
'kldunload msdosfs' unloads it ok.
But 'kldunload msdosfs_iconv' hangs OS
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:45:33PM -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
I don't recall FreeBSD supporting extended partitions... at all
I remember reading they aren't in /dev/ but still is mountable. Is this
still the case?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:44:10 +0200, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:28:55 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
I think this is a reasonable approach to the problem of which
installation mode to launch. The default is `user friendly', [...]
No,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:52:56 -0400, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Last week I have installed Solaris 10 ( 2008-10 ) on a PC ( x86 )
having an Intel main board . It did not recognize Philips 220WS LCD (
1680 x 1050 ) monitor and selected itself a text-mode install and
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be
displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message
correctly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Colleagues,
I have updated 6.3-RELEASE to 6.4-RELEASE-p4 (actually recent RELENG_6_4)
from source (make buildworld etc).
However freebsd-update cron still insists that I should update my system:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 6.4-RELEASE-p4:
/lib/libc.so.6
Yesterday I updated ports. And now firefox3 crashes right after start.
Windows firefox3 under wine also has some graphics defects, many icons
are jammed.
Some icons in kde4 applets are oversized.
Something isn't quite right.
Anyone has similar problems?
Yuri
46 matches
Mail list logo
