Hi. I'll try this again.
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
in the
Hi
I run systems using FreeBSD 9.0
FreeBSD utah.XXXcom 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #1: Wed Mar 21 15:22:14
MDT 2012 chad@underhill:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UNDERHILL-XEN amd64
and on those systems run a bunch of jails. I have Apache 2.2 built and running
in the jail in question, and
Hi
In installing trac I ran across a segmentation fault in the initenv
command.
This seems to be the same problem as shown here:
http://www.nabble.com/ports-116383%3A-sqlite3-%28from-databases-
sqlite3%29-segfault-tf4449251.html#a12694631
Running it in gdb shows
Program received signal
On Jun 24, 2006, at 10:21 PM, Nick Withers wrote:
I tend to think of Dell as a low-end provider that will cobble
together systems based on whatever bits happen to be lying
around (don't think that one PE 2650 is the same as the next!),
which in turn are invariably the cheapest bits available
Hi
I have successfully built Java 1.4.2 inside a jail on 5.4, but am
having problems doing the same thing for 1.5.0 on 6.0.
I have all the Sun stuff downloaded as well as the linux 1.4.2
runtime port installed fine.
The build ran for a million hours. At which point it came back with:
For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that is only acting as an NFS
server and nothing else, is there any advantage to using an SMP
machine? Any disadvantage?
Does CPU speed play any great factor (ie, use a 1.8ghz opteron
instead of a 2.2ghz opteron for example)?
I am planning for a
a few months ago the following appeared in -stable
In the last episode (Mar 15), Niklas Saers said:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Niklas Saers wrote:
I've got four servers that all have the same problem: when jobs get
started from Cron, they die after some time with an Abort trap.
Jobs that are
Hi
Sorry for the URGENT line. I have a critical server running 5.4-
RELEASE-p1. It is a dual AMD MP 2800+ (Gigabyte board) with 4GB RAM
and an Adaptec 2100S raid controller.
Running (obviously) an SMP kernel. I recompiled the kernel this
afternoon and changed one line -- the
options
pid 80941 (tcsh), uid 5051 inumber 166876 on /local/jails/jail1:
filesystem full
pid 80941 (tcsh), uid 5051 inumber 166876 on /local/jails/jail1:
filesystem full
pid 80941 (tcsh), uid 5051 inumber 166876 on /local/jails/jail1:
filesystem full
pid 80941 (tcsh), uid 5051 inumber 166876 on
Ok
I have an md(4) file system that I changed the block size and inode
density on. The file was about 1.3GB in size originally and when
using newfs with standard parameters shows about 1.3GB in size. My
new parameters to newfs ( -f 512 -b 4096 -i 1024 -U -O 2) are meant
to allow a lot
I have a new directory I want to be always used to look for shared
libraries.
I do a
% ldconfig -m /usr/public/lib
and all is well. However, on reboot, the changes go away and I have to
do it again. Does not work so well if things that start up at boot
time rely on libraries in the new
On Apr 21, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Chris McGee wrote:
I've got 2 identical boxes (Supermicro sys-6023P-8R) running with ZCR
adaptec cards with 6 73Gig seagate scsi drives, 4 Gigs of ram, and
dual 2.4 Ghz Xeons. Both of these machines are running
5.3-Release-p8. The usually run for a day, give or
On Apr 21, 2005, at 7:42 PM, Christopher McGee wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Apr 21, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Chris McGee wrote:
I've got 2 identical boxes (Supermicro sys-6023P-8R) running with
ZCR adaptec cards with 6 73Gig seagate scsi drives, 4 Gigs of ram,
and dual 2.4 Ghz Xeons.
I have a self-compiled mysql 4.1 (4.1.9) on FreeBSD 5.3. (Not built
from ports for various reasons). The system load skyrockets when the
web server that is using the mysql for its PHPnuke storage starts to
get 100 or so or more active sessions. It appears that mysql is the
culprit. The
On Apr 14, 2005, at 5:28 PM, Benson Wong wrote:
So theoretically it should go over 1000TBI've conducted several
bastardized
installations due to sysinstall not being able to do anything over
the 2TB
limit by creating the partition ahead of timeI am going to be
attacking
this tonight and my
On FreeBSD 5.3, what is the overhead compared to a filesystem directly
on the HW, of an /dev/mdX device with a file system on it living on the
same HW device?
Thanks
Chad
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Apr 8, 2005, at 2:13 PM, Ralph wrote:
--- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote:
Is there a chance to get digital camers working
with FreeBSD? All I
need is load images from camera using USB port.
Most digital camera's today
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:28 PM, Sergei Gnezdov wrote:
Is there a chance to get digital camers working with FreeBSD? All I
need is load images from camera using USB port.
Most digital camera's today implement the USB mass storage system, so
you should just try and plug the camera in. It may work!
On Mar 11, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
If I install Windows 1st (I have to, right?), should I save
NN gigs of disc space for SuSE when I buy their CD? Is there
a better flavor on Linux that I should consider?
Depending on how much you like to do and how much you want a
On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 10), Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC said:
On Mar 10, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 09), Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC said:
The following is aon 5.3-RELEASE-p5
If I do a limits command I get
# limits
On Mar 11, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
PS: When did DEC ever have a PeeCee? I remember their
11/* machines fondly; the next thing I knew they got
bought out by a PC firm.
DEC had lots of PCs. Desktops, laptops. etc. Even SAMs club had DEC
PCs.
They started off
On Mar 11, 2005, at 7:24 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:24:10PM -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
On Mar 11, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
PS: When did DEC ever have a PeeCee? I remember their
11/* machines fondly; the next thing I knew they got
Hi
The following is aon 5.3-RELEASE-p5
If I do a limits command I get
# limits
Resource limits (current):
cputime infinity secs
filesize infinity kb
datasize 524288 kb
stacksize 65536 kb
coredumpsize infinity kb
memoryuseinfinity kb
On Mar 10, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 09), Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC said:
The following is aon 5.3-RELEASE-p5
If I do a limits command I get
# limits
Resource limits (current):
datasize 524288 kb
stacksize 65536 kb
#
However, login.conf
Hi
I have a 5.3-REL-p5 system and I accidently deleted an apache log
before processing it. I would like to recover as much as possible from
it. I have been looking in the sysutils ports and Googling but have
not come up with a way of doing this. What is the best way to attempt
to recover a
On Mar 9, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
Hi
I have a 5.3-REL-p5 system and I accidently deleted an apache log
before processing it. I would like to recover as much as possible
from it. I have been looking in the sysutils ports and Googling but
have not come up with a
On Mar 9, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Mar 9, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
Hi
I have a 5.3-REL-p5 system and I accidently deleted an apache log
before processing it. I would like to recover as much as possible
from it. I have been looking in
Hi
The following is aon 5.3-RELEASE-p5
If I do a limits command I get
# limits
Resource limits (current):
cputime infinity secs
filesize infinity kb
datasize 524288 kb
stacksize 65536 kb
coredumpsize infinity kb
memoryuseinfinity kb
On Mar 7, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Frank de Bot wrote:
Jorn Argelo wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:04:41 +0100, Frank de Bot wrote
Hi,
I've set up a jail. But I don't have any idea how safe a jail is.
Often is told chroot and jails can be escaped. How safe is it to
give other people user access to a
On Mar 7, 2005, at 12:31 AM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 06 March 2005 11:28 pm, popbox wrote:
Excuse me for foolish question and pig latin.
I'm a new user of FreeBSD and I have a trouble with mounting
DVD. There is no separated information in your documentation
(Handbook) about
Gruss
On Mar 2, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Stevan Tiefert wrote:
$FreeBSD: src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c,v 1.92 2003/10/26 04:36:47
peter Exp $
Basically, if your sources, or the particular source file in question,
are not newer than correction date listed in the security alert then
you
need to follow
On Feb 26, 2005, at 7:40 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Jon Drews writes:
If you think the FreeBSD community is a nightmare then why are you
sticking around except to stir up strife ?
It's the closest thing to support available for FreeBSD. There's
nothing else.
I am sorry, but I get the same level
On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:01 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
And they are still buying Microsoft Office because their users are
demanding it.
I don't believe this. I believe that a few users demand it, and by
default everyone else gets it. Some manager or IT VP or someone
decides that is the new corp
On Feb 25, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Your missing the point. It's far more cost-effective for a business
to
not hire a bunch of whiners in the first place.
They aren't whiners. It's perfectly logical for them to want to work
with software for which
On Feb 24, 2005, at 1:50 AM, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh wrote:
Dear all,
Can freebsd load linux drivers?
No
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL
On Feb 23, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
[*] Kame is Japanese for turtle, or more precisely it's an English
transliteration of the Japanese for turtle.
No, it is one of the Romaji transliterations [may be the only one since
it is a simple word, but there are
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:23 PM, Jacob S wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:46:47 +0100
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S writes:
Good. I'm glad to see the average Windows user looking around the
computer store still gets to see an alternative once in a while.
I'm pretty sure I've seen
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:32 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:23 PM, Jacob S wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:46:47 +0100
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S writes:
Good. I'm glad to see the average Windows user looking around the
computer store still gets to
On Feb 23, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes:
Possibly. It could also be something primitive like twm, of course.
I meant whatever is used most on commercial UNIX configurations, like
Solaris or whatever I'd be likely to encounter on a large site.
It appears
On Feb 22, 2005, at 8:27 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan Nelson writes:
Is it write-protected? Securelevel too high? Check your console or
dmesg output; the kernel may be printing more info there.
No console messages that I've seen, but securelevel=3.
On Feb 22, 2005, at 2:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Eric F Crist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-22 15:55:32
-0600]:
Does it hang at certain times? Again, across multiple versions of OS
X
and FreeBSD, I've never experienced a problem.
I haven't found a time that it will not hang after a few
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:04 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
* Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-22 18:43:39 -0500]:
Jim Freeze wrote:
Show us what SSH shows when the connection locks up. In particular,
try
doing a RETURN~? after you get the connection lockup and see
whether
you get a menu of escape
On Feb 21, 2005, at 12:44 AM, bsdnooby wrote:
Instead of getting a fixed IP address at my house, and having a noisy
machine running all the time - I think I might want to try renting a
dedicated FreeBSD server. It would be used for running Apache, phpBB,
email, listserv, and a few other
On Feb 20, 2005, at 7:07 PM, Jeff Hinrichs wrote:
I'd have to agree with the poster. For a small installation Courier
is faster to get up and running the Cyrus. But once you start having
to use it with 20-30 users, Cyrus is hands down a better deal. Yes,
it does take a more grokking to get
My /etc/exports file looks like
/local -maproot=0 -alldirslocalhost
/usr/ports -maproot=0 localhost
/local/2 -maproot=0 -alldirslocalhost
/local/2/jail1/usr/ports -maproot=0 -alldirs localhost
/local/jails/wo_mount -maproot=0 -alldirslocalhost 192.168.252.252
/local/2/jail1/compat
On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:51 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:17:51 +0100, Hubert Sokoowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:05:43 +0100
Gert Cuykens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static void callback( GtkWidget *widget, gpointer data ){
g_print (Hello again - %s was
On Feb 19, 2005, at 4:07 PM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 02:57:53 -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire. Net LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:51 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:17:51 +0100, Hubert Sokoowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:05:43
On Feb 19, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Spades wrote:
How do we check if FreeBSD recorgnises it as individual drives or
Hardware RAID array.
Your raid chip appears to be a software ATA raid. man ata
The raid appears as arN according to man ata
look in the dmesg to see what happened at boot -- this will
On Feb 18, 2005, at 12:50 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 1:34 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: 'Mikhail Teterin'; Robert Kim, EVDO-Coverage, Verizon Agent; List
Free Bsd
Subject: Re:
While tracking down test errors while installing Apache 2.0.53 and
mod_perl2.0.0-RC4 into a jail process on a FreeBSD 5.3 server, we have
encountered some errors with how the ip is being resolved for the
loopback device.
Using test code from the Apache project[1], we were able to determine
that a
On Feb 18, 2005, at 11:39 PM, Spades wrote:
hi, my server hardware supports hardware raid, i installed it
as per normal freebsd 5.3, however i see no difference
in df. its using 2 x 160GB, what do i do during the installation
to enable the raid?
mobo:
On Feb 18, 2005, at 11:56 PM, Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Saturday 19 February 2005 00:51, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Feb 18, 2005, at 11:39 PM, Spades wrote:
hi, my server hardware supports hardware raid, i installed it
as per normal freebsd 5.3, however i see no difference
in df. its using
On Feb 19, 2005, at 12:37 AM, Sandy Rutherford wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:51:53 -0700,
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Feb 18, 2005, at 11:39 PM, Spades wrote:
hi, my server hardware supports hardware raid, i installed it
as per normal freebsd 5.3, however i see no
Sorry to top post but this is general info
There is a bug in 5.3-RELEASE make files that has been fixed in -STABLE.
See the archives for previous discussions on this.
Chad
On Feb 17, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Viren Patel wrote:
I am running a 5.3-RELEASE-p5 machine.
$uname -a
FreeBSD twinmp.tcbug.org
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Robert,
Hmm - The Mac source (I assume your talking Mac OS X) would probably
be the best to start with. It might be a very easy port to whatever
version of FreeBSD was used for the version of Mac OS X you wrote the
driver for.
Mac OS X is not
On Feb 15, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
That surely explains their sales of XServes and RAID servers.
They're off the radar for servers. The only people who install Apple
servers are people who are already in love with Apple desktops.
They're
kind of the inverse of people who
On Feb 15, 2005, at 3:28 PM, Jon Adams wrote:
Benjamin Dover wrote:
Take a look at this section of the handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/quotas.html
Yes, I've read this and am aware of the process of recompiling the
kernel to implement quotas (done it before).
On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Vonleigh Simmons writes:
If you need to run explorer to access a website, someone should be
fired. Standards compliance is a good thing.
MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than almost
any other browser. Firefox does
On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
That is laughable. MS IE on Windows has one of the worst reputations
around for following web standards. Go ask any professional designer.
I did better. I actually ran the W3C conformance tests against
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:40 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Apple is smart enough to pull it off ...
Apple has no advantage over Microsoft in this respect. They are
locking
their own OS into a GUI, too. But they probably realize that their
future is in desktops, not servers.
You know not of what
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:49 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
An operating system is just a software package.
In this context, one can think of the operating system as the aggregate
of permanent code executing with kernel privileges.
Drivers execute with these privileges but they are essentially
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:32 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
You can say all you want.
Thank you. I feel better about it knowing that it's okay with you.
Every professional designer I have ever talked with lamented the poor
state of standards conformance of IE for
On Feb 14, 2005, at 11:11 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
no they did and could point out specific problems and likely
intentional changes.
Where can I see a list of these?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/hakon_on_ms_interroperability/
This page points to a
On Feb 13, 2005, at 12:54 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
Or if you are a BSD/UNIX/Linux admin. It is a lot easier to ssh and
do
all the other things you want with your unix-like servers from Mac OS
X
than from Windows.
Why? I use SecureCRT and SecureFX for
On Feb 13, 2005, at 12:57 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
Maybe companies who support MS or other proprietary software
can't as they don't have the source. But support companies that
support open source can very easily fix problems -- they have the
source and the
On Feb 13, 2005, at 1:00 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
I can't think of any time that MS is the best choice, except in
perhaps
some vertical market cases. It is often the most convenient choice.
Convenience is reason enough by itself to choose a particular OS.
On Feb 13, 2005, at 1:30 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
They exist. A friend of mine had one running on w2000 several years
ago logging into hi BSD and Linux boxes using xterm. It worked
reasonably well.
How much did he pay for it?
I don't know which one he used. Sorry.
Many of the ones I saw
On Feb 13, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Ean Kingston wrote:
On February 13, 2005 03:53 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
You can install the X libraries and client apps on your server --
this
works fine at secure level 3 and does not require kernel
configurations
changes or
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
many in no way means a majority. many is more than a few, where a few
is a handful (3-5 or so). There are probably more than a handful who
do it as more than a hobby. A lot of good people do it on their
On Feb 12, 2005, at 5:59 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The stabilities of NT-based systems and UNIX are roughly the same when
kernels are compared.
How exactly does one do this when the NT kernel code isn't available
for perusal?
Other than, of course, just running both and assuming that because
I made the choice of FreeBSD in 1996 for my fledgling hosting business.
I considered Linux and FreeBSD. At the time, FreeBSD was considered
to have a much better VM system under load, and similar sorts of
stability characteristics. I chose FreeBSD then and am glad I did so.
I do not know
On Feb 12, 2005, at 8:26 AM, Aaron Dalton wrote:
Since upgrading to the latest exim (4.44?) I will occasionally notice
I am not receiving mail. I will check the server (ps -ax | grep
'exim') and find that there are dozens of exim processes running (exim
-bd -q30m). I will do 'exim.sh stop'
On Feb 12, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Chris Zumbrunn wrote:
On Feb 12, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
Chris Zumbrunn wrote:
[snip]
http://top.ch/sitedata/freebsd/beastie.gif
[snip]
Maybe just the FreeBSD part and a couple of stylized horns over it,
but that would mean Beastie would not
On Feb 12, 2005, at 7:02 PM, Thomas Foster wrote:
My solution is to remove emotion from the equation and simply install
the best software for the job. On the desktop, that's Windows.
--
Anthony
Sometimes Mac is a better solution on the desktop, especially when it
comes to Multimedia:
On Feb 12, 2005, at 6:53 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Paul Mather writes:
I hate to burst your bubble, but neither is any other OS vendor
ultimately accountable for its code.
Actually it is. That's why companies tend to prefer support from
vendors; vendors have a vested interest in making good on
On Feb 12, 2005, at 6:56 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Every $ spent on a product is another $ supporting it.
Incidentally true, but not always the objective.
Rarely.
Frequently. Many software choices and upgrade decisions today are
driven primarily or solely by a need to
On Feb 11, 2005, at 6:00 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Since when did FreeBSD, a project always driven by volunteers and not
by commercial matters, suddenly gain a marketing department that is
trying to steer FreeBSD into the business sector? Is FreeBSD starting
to have marketing dictate
On Feb 11, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Frank Laszlo wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Feb 11, 2005, at 6:00 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Since when did FreeBSD, a project always driven by volunteers and
not by commercial matters, suddenly gain a marketing department that
is trying to steer
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:11 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
Many of the people that work
on it are paid to work on it by their employers, who are using it
commercially.
That would mean that their employers hold a copyright in the FreeBSD
code written by their
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Frank Laszlo writes:
I wouldnt say many, there are few commiters who are actually paid to
work on it, most commiters/developers do it as a hobby.
What written agreements do these committers have with their employers?
Normally, if you are paid
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
many in no way means a majority. many is more than a few, where a few
is a handful (3-5 or so). There are probably more than a handful who
do it as more than a hobby. A lot of good people do it on their
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:30 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
Look in the codebase
No, tell me right here. CIOs aren't going to look in the codebase to
try to find out if it's legal for them to use the operating system.
You ask a dumb question, get such an answer.
You
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
Their employers are paying them TO WORK on FreeBSD. They are not
taking
their code that they write for their employers and also sticking it in
FreeBSD. Big difference.
Not if their work consists of writing
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Joshua Tinnin writes:
I don't think you understand the history of FreeBSD. Many people who
work at Yahoo! are committers, and their employer not only knows about
this but encourages it.
That's not good enough. The employer has to assign its
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
You ask a dumb question, get such an answer.
Be sure to tell the CIOs that. That'll do wonders for adoption of
FreeBSD.
CIOs don't hang out in public mailing lists asking such questions
Chad
You make
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
CIOs don't hang out in public mailing lists asking such questions
But some of us hanging out on such lists have to answer these questions
when talking to CIOs. And saying I don't know just doesn't wash.
And
On Feb 11, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
And the standard answer is RTFM
I don't know of anything in the manuals or on the Web site that answers
this type of question.
Typical. Cut out the rest of what I said.
You need to ask the right people, not
On Feb 11, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Robert Marella wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:25 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
athony atkielski =~ /tm452\d/ ?
I was beginning to suspect some such.
Maybe worse.
jerry
Jerry and Eric
If I can remember correctly, I have received help from both of you on
some of my
On Feb 11, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Johnson David wrote:
From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop.
Agree and disagree. While FreeBSD is well suited for the server, it's
also
well suited for the desktop.
Anthony had the same misguided opinion in the
On Feb 11, 2005, at 7:34 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Kevin Kinsey writes:
IIRC, this was the sort of thing that caused a few people to
killfile your address a couple years back.
The sort of teenage-boy attitude that causes some people to killfile
others is one of the worst handicaps of the
On Feb 11, 2005, at 7:54 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
On a related note: Balmer's big mouth hasn't killed Windows
yet either.
Only because Gates built the company up into a successful multinational
with a lot of inertia before Balmer took the helm. But that big mouth
is still a liability for the
On Feb 11, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Robert Marella wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:11 -0700, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Feb 11, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Robert Marella wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:25 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
athony atkielski =~ /tm452\d/ ?
I was beginning to suspect some
On Feb 11, 2005, at 8:32 PM, Robert Marella wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:14 +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Johnson David wrote:
Currently Windows rules the desktop world, even for diehard Unix
shops. But
that will not last forever. We need to start thinking about the
desktop
today. We need to
On Feb 11, 2005, at 8:44 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Robert Marella writes:
As far as the codebase question, he was not the one to bring it up. If
I can read between his lines, I understand that when you go in front
of the suits you can't tell them RTFM. You have to explain why FreeBSD
is head
On Feb 11, 2005, at 8:49 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
Not in public it doesn't. That is irrelevant to the discussion.
FreeBSD does not work on my PPC HW either.
Score: 12 out of 100. The meeting is over, and a security guard will
show you the door.
Try again.
On Feb 10, 2005, at 12:50 AM, r p wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:12:06 -0600, Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've been trying get jails working on my 5.3-RELEASE-p2 machine.
I've tried following the instructions in man 8 jail
D=/here/is/the/jail
cd /usr/src
mkdir -p $D
make world DESTDIR=$D
On Feb 9, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
And in the past, I've only ever worn or
used logos if they were for the Red Sox, the Patriots (and even those
sparingly), or a free shirt. Hey, free is free, right?
What, no Celtics?
I will admit to having bought lots of Apple shirts and a Celtics
On Feb 9, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Most odd, there definitely has to be a problem with the Dual-Xeon
ysystem ... doing the same vmstat on my other vinum based system,
running more, but on a Dual-PIII shows major idle time:
# vmstat 5
procs memory page
On Feb 8, 2005, at 4:19 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad Leigh --
Shire.Net LLC
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:29 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Electricity bill - OT
A lot of new-built
On Feb 8, 2005, at 8:32 AM, r p wrote:
Hi,
I've set up a jail and am getting confused about setting up the
devices. The name of the jail is jail and it's directory is
/usr/jail. I am using 5.3-Release. I have tried three methods, one
that works, two that don't.
At the moment what I'm doing is
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
