to specify with -y to automatically answer those?
I've tried --clean-distfiles, --clean-packages but it's not it.
It usually happens when doing portmaster --packages-build
--delete-build-only
build.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple
when doing portmaster --packages-build
--delete-build-only
build.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 07/03/2012 12:29 PM, Jakub Lach wrote:
=== Starting check for runtime dependencies
=== Gathering dependency list for archivers/unzip from ports
=== No dependencies for archivers/unzip
=== Installing package
=== Installation of archivers/unzip (unzip-6.0_1) succeeded
=== Delete
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Dean E. Weimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
-d tells it to always delete old files without prompting.
Thanks,
Dean Weimer
On Jul 3, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
=== Starting check for runtime dependencies
===
Excellent, I knew I was missing something simple.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723916.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Now I see that I even used -d in my own portupdating
wrapper, but forgot about it and it's meaning, embarrassing.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723918.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions
On 03/07/2012 13:06, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 07/03/2012 12:29 PM, Jakub Lach wrote:
What option do I need to specify with -y to automatically answer those?
-d
Add this to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/portmaster.rc
ALWAYS_SCRUB_DISTFILES=dopt
if that's something you're going to be doing all the time.
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:52:13 +1030, David Walker wrote:
Hey.
I believe I have a pcmcia card that requires upgt firmware.
From upgt(4) ...
This driver requires the upgtfw firmware to be installed before it will
work. The firmware files are not publicly available. A package of
Hi Polytropon.
I did have a look inside and I did pkg_add -v which gives enough
information combined with my meagre knowledge to guess that it had
something to do with source.
I'm so unfamiliar with pkg_add I'm not sure if that is normal.
I'm very new here.
Certainly it's not in a suitable format
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:41:46 +1030, David Walker wrote:
Hi Polytropon.
I did have a look inside and I did pkg_add -v which gives enough
information combined with my meagre knowledge to guess that it had
something to do with source.
A port (as you can find it inside the archive) is a recipe
Dear sir,
My first English is not English, please forgive me if I made some bad
words
or expression.
I have learned from your web site http://www.freebsd.org,
that version 6.2 is released in 15 Jan, 2007.
Is that a stable release?
If it is, why there is 6.2-stable
PowerMan wrote:
Dear sir,
My first English is not English, please forgive me if I made some bad
words
or expression.
I have learned from your web site http://www.freebsd.org,
that version 6.2 is released in 15 Jan, 2007.
Is that a stable release?
If it is, why there is
Dear sir,
My first language is not English, please forgive me if I made some bad
words
or expression.
I have learned from your web site http://www.freebsd.org,
that version 6.2 is released in 15 Jan, 2007.
Is that a stable release?
If it is, why there is 6.2-stable
PowerMan wrote:
I guess you mean that:
The snapshots of 6.2 stable released in June 2007
have been patched ,
I can also download patches from http://security.freebsd.org/patches/
http://security.freebsd.org/patches/
and apply them to the offical release manually.
Is that right?
thanks.
dear sir,
I copy some content from http://security.freebsd.org/,
* FreeBSD-SA-07:05.libarchive.asc
* FreeBSD-SA-07:04.file.asc
* FreeBSD-SA-07:03.ipv6.asc
* FreeBSD-SA-07:02.bind.asc
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE released.
* FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail.asc
* FreeBSD-SA-06:26.gtar.asc
Dear sir,
My first language is not English, please forgive me if I made some bad
words. And I do not know if that is the right e-mail address to ask
questions.
I copy a few lines from http://security.freebsd.org/
-
Is that mean if I use 5.5-release, I should apply all the patches above and
if I use 6.2-release I need only apply the
FreeBSD-SA-07:05.libarchive.aschttp://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-07:05.libarchive.asc
to
Graham Bentley wrote:
Example: you install Z, which depends on Y, which depends in X,
..., which depends on Q.
What if Q is xorg-server-6.9.0_1?
I installed 'feh' thinking wrongly it was a console app and ended up
getting x, xlibs etc etc when all I wanted was a console app to view
jpgs in
And ... how to remove a package and all the packages
it sucked in ?
All I get from pkg_delete that it isnt even installed when
I know it is because that was the previous command I
just ran !!!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Graham Bentley írta:
And ... how to remove a package and all the packages
it sucked in ?
All I get from pkg_delete that it isnt even installed when
I know it is because that was the previous command I
just ran !!!
Can you please send us the commands that you have executed?
If you used
On Thursday November 30, 2006 at 07:25:32 (AM) Graham Bentley wrote:
And ... how to remove a package and all the packages
it sucked in ?
All I get from pkg_delete that it isnt even installed when
I know it is because that was the previous command I
just ran !!!
Are you sure you are
Graham Bentley writes:
And ... how to remove a package and all the packages
it sucked in ?
You don't want to do this blindly.
Example: you install Z, which depends on Y, which depends in X,
..., which depends on Q.
What if Q is xorg-server-6.9.0_1?
Example: you install Z, which depends on Y, which depends in X,
..., which depends on Q.
What if Q is xorg-server-6.9.0_1?
I installed 'feh' thinking wrongly it was a console app and ended up
getting x, xlibs etc etc when all I wanted was a console app to view
jpgs in elinks. So, the above is
Dino Vliet wrote:
I'm almost ashamed to ask this BUT I really don't know
how to find the packages which depend upon a
particular port.
pkg_info -R port-name-\*
(-r does the inverse, packages on which port-name depends)
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dino Vliet wrote:
I'm almost ashamed to ask this BUT I really don't know
how to find the packages which depend upon a
particular port.
pkg_info -R port-name-\*
(-r does the inverse, packages on which port-name depends)
Cheers,
Matthew
Also, if
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Dino Vliet thusly...
I'm almost ashamed to ask this BUT I really don't know how to find
the packages which depend upon a particular port.
In this case, a portversion -l showed mysql-client in that
list. I can't recall having installed it by myself
Did
I haven't worked with multicast much, but from my understanding you
may have to join the router to the multicast domain.
On 6/15/06, Mayo, Richard A RDECOM CERDEC STCD SRI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is a simple fix, but I sure can't find it.
I set up 2 FreeBSD boxes as dual-stack
Are you running mrouted?
--- Atom Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't worked with multicast much, but from
my understanding you
may have to join the router to the multicast
domain.
On 6/15/06, Mayo, Richard A RDECOM CERDEC STCD
SRI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is a
-Original Message-
From: Danial Thom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:59 AM
To: Atom Powers; Mayo, Richard A RDECOM CERDEC STCD SRI
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Probably a simple question but...
Are you running mrouted?
I'm
I believe this is a simple fix, but I sure can't find it.
I set up 2 FreeBSD boxes as dual-stack network routers and I'm using them to
test an application capable of generating both TCP and UDP messaging. The TCP
part of this equation is working great -- my message fly around the network
just
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0500, David R. Litwin wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Killall.
Seems like a bad idea, unless the service is hung. Using the proper init
script would make more sense. To simply stop the service, /etc/init.d/gdm
stop
as root would do the
Teilhard Knight wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Formally it's:
invoke-rc.d gdm stop
But everybody (including myself) uses:
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
To stop it permanently use:
update-rc.d gdm remove
Thanks a lot.
Teilhard.
Am 2005-12-20 04:04:24, schrieb Teilhard Knight:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
It depends.
1) For killing it the current bootet Computer
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
2) Only from the runlevel 2
rm /etc/rc2.d/??gdm
3) Permanently
apt-get --purge remove gdm
Teilhard Knight wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Teilhard.
Simple answer: RTFM
Extended answer: $ info gdm
Thanks.
Teilhard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
as root: /etc/gdm stop
Are you sure? I haven't tried it, but seems something is missing. Thanks
anyway.
Teilhard.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Teilhard Knight wrote:
as root: /etc/gdm stop
Are you sure? I haven't tried it, but seems something is missing.
Thanks anyway.
Teilhard.
/etc/rc.d/gdm stop
See:
rc(8)
rcorder(8)
rc.conf(5)
Regards,
Gabor Kovesdan
___
Hello, I´m a student of computer science and this year I must to do an
application using system calls.
We are using linux system calls like pid_t fork(void) and other services of
the standard POSIX. I want to know if it´s possible to use that system calls in
FreeBSD because I prefer to improve
On Nov 4, 2005, at 1:12 PM, Javier Matos wrote:
Hello, I´m a student of computer science and this year I must to do
an application using system calls.
We are using linux system calls like pid_t fork(void) and other
services of the standard POSIX. I want to know if it´s possible to
use that
On 8/10/05, Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to configure my dns to redirect all request from :
http://www.mail.mydomain.com http://www.mail.mydomain.com
to
http://mail.mydomain.com
Many users do first request and my server respond only al the second url.
Tks!
On 2005-08-10 10:01, Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to configure my dns to redirect all request from :
http://www.mail.mydomain.com http://www.mail.mydomain.com
to
http://mail.mydomain.com
Many users do first request and my server respond only al the second url.
Tks!
1. Add
- Original Message -
From: Carstea Catalin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 12:01 PM
Subject: Simple question of dns?
I want to configure my dns to redirect all request from :
http://www.mail.mydomain.com http
Hello,
From: Tiago Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:24:49 +0100
In what concern to my previous mails I can summarize and simplify the
problem:
Why when I enable the ipv6_gateway_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf the
following error occurs (I am using freebsd 5.4 and the last kame
On Jul 6, 2005, at 3:45 PM, Efren Bravo wrote:
Hi again, I'm reading a Pdf book downloaded from freeBSD.org called
FreeBSD Handbook and there I always find this references: sendmail
(8) sshd(8) /etc/inetd.conf(5) -Which is the meaning of those
numbers Thanks
It refers to the section of
On 7/6/05, Efren Bravo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
I'm reading a Pdf book downloaded from freeBSD.org called FreeBSD
Handbook and there I always find this references:
sendmail(8)
sshd(8)
/etc/inetd.conf(5) -Which is the meaning of those numbers
Thanks
The numbers refer to
Hi again,
I'm reading a Pdf book downloaded from freeBSD.org called FreeBSD
Handbook and there I always find this references:
sendmail(8)
sshd(8)
/etc/inetd.conf(5) -Which is the meaning of those numbers
Those are the man page sections to look at for documentation.
So 'man
On 07/06/05 03:45 PM, Efren Bravo sat at the `puter and typed:
Hi again,
I'm reading a Pdf book downloaded from freeBSD.org called FreeBSD
Handbook and there I always find this references:
sendmail(8)
sshd(8)
/etc/inetd.conf(5) -Which is the meaning of those numbers
This refers
I just want to note: it tokk all of five minutes to get an answer to this
question. I know not all questions are, or can be, answered this quickly. I
just think it's worth noting that Open Source Software does have excellent
user support. . .
Just my .02 :-)
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 07:45
Swiger
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Efren Bravo
Cc: freeBSD
Subject: Re: Simple question
On Jul 6, 2005, at 3:45 PM, Efren Bravo wrote:
Hi again, I'm reading a Pdf book downloaded from freeBSD.org called
FreeBSD Handbook and there I always find this references: sendmail
(8) sshd(8
Hello Guys a quick and simple question. Which command line should I
use to see the type of processor I am using?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
In the last episode (Dec 02), Alvaro Rosales said:
Hello Guys a quick and simple question. Which command line should I
use to see the type of processor I am using?
The file /var/run/dmesg.boot will give you a lot of detail, some of
which is stored in the hw sysctl tree for easy retrieval
Alvaro Rosales wrote:
Hello Guys a quick and simple question. Which command line should I
use to see the type of processor I am using?
uname -mp
sysctl -a hw
--
-Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:30:18 -0600, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Dec 02), Alvaro Rosales said:
Hello Guys a quick and simple question. Which command line should I
use to see the type of processor I am using?
The file /var/run/dmesg.boot will give you a lot
Experienced linux debian user, recently I smoothly moved to linux gentoo
(BSD compliant) AND to FreeBSD 5.2.1.
1) I want to tailor my freeBSD slice according to my machine (gentoo
experience is helpful!). Now, while i I know how to compile an
application in /usr/ports I cannot find sources of
Vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Experienced linux debian user, recently I smoothly moved to linux gentoo
(BSD compliant) AND to FreeBSD 5.2.1.
1) I want to tailor my freeBSD slice according to my machine (gentoo
experience is helpful!). Now, while i I know how to compile an
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:29:07 +, Vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Where are those sources?
/usr/src
2) The questions' question: where can I read what are the options I can
use with a certain source package and how can I use them when
make(-ing) the program?
Read the makefile or
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:29:07 +, Vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I want to tailor my freeBSD slice according to my machine (gentoo
experience is helpful!). Now, while i I know how to compile an
application in /usr/ports I cannot find sources of the base system I
had to install when
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:29:07PM +, Vittorio wrote:
Experienced linux debian user, recently I smoothly moved to linux gentoo
(BSD compliant) AND to FreeBSD 5.2.1.
1) I want to tailor my freeBSD slice according to my machine (gentoo
experience is helpful!). Now, while i I know how to
Hi!
Can anyone tell me the size of folder '/usr/src' when the cvsup is
complete?
I ran cvsup 8 hours ago and it's still running ... my network is very
slow... :(
Thanks in advance!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 11:20:08PM +0600, baguio_sun wrote:
Hi!
Can anyone tell me the size of folder '/usr/src' when the cvsup is
complete?
About 350 MB.
I ran cvsup 8 hours ago and it's still running ... my network is very
slow... :(
If you have a slow network connection, then it can
Hello baguio_sun,
Sunday, October 31, 2004, 7:23:06 PM, you wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 11:20:08PM +0600, baguio_sun wrote:
Hi!
Can anyone tell me the size of folder '/usr/src' when the cvsup is
complete?
About 350 MB.
I ran cvsup 8 hours ago and it's still running ... my network
I compile a test C file. I notice there are a few lines at the
beginning of the assembly code. I want to know what it means, but
can't figure out one of them. Can anyone tell me what the
following line does please?
and$0xfff0,%esp
Hmmm, when I compile the simplest possible C file:
thank you very much for the reply
yes and I am using gcc 3.2.2
if you gdb the executable and disassemble main
you will see the line like that
but if you use gcc -S something.s something.c
it won't appear in the assembly code
and I google around, I think it does the alignment for optimization
I compile a test C file. I notice there are a few lines at the
beginning of the assembly code. I want to know what it means, but
can't figure out one of them. Can anyone tell me what the
following line does please?
and$0xfff0,%esp
gcc2_compiled.:
.text
Hello..
I have a simple question, but I am not sure what the answer is. If anyone can
possibly help me, it is really appreciated.
I compile a test C file. I notice there are a few lines at the beginning of the
assembly code. I want to know what it means, but can't figure out one of them. Can
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:13:43 +
chungwei Hsiung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello..
I have a simple question, but I am not sure what the answer is. If
anyone can possibly help me, it is really appreciated. I compile a
test C file. I notice there are a few lines at the beginning
On Monday, January 19, 2004, 2:00:21 AM, Rishi Chopra wrote:
Forgive the stupid question, but why are the 'rfc1918' and 'draft
manning' sections repeated in the default rc.firewall file? Does this
have something to do with the natd statement in between them? I
understand the rules are
Forgive the stupid question, but why are the 'rfc1918' and 'draft
manning' sections repeated in the default rc.firewall file? Does this
have something to do with the natd statement in between them? I
understand the rules are processed (added) sequentially, so am I missing
something?
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 07:17:51AM +1100, Sue Blake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This memory question comes up a lot, and I'm not sure how up to date
that part of the documentation is. Has anyone _definitely_ run an
install on a machine with only 8MB in the last couple of years?
Twice I have
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 07:17:51 +1100, Sue Blake wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:28:14PM -0500, taxman wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2003 08:23 pm, Wizard of Wor wrote:
I was unable to find the minimum requirements on x86 platform. Can I
run FreeBSD on mz 486dx2 8Mb laptop smoothly?
The
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:28:14PM -0500, taxman wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2003 08:23 pm, Wizard of Wor wrote:
I was unable to find the minimum requirements on x86 platform. Can I
run FreeBSD on mz 486dx2 8Mb laptop smoothly?
The install documentation or the FAQ does have this answer, but
I was unable to find the minimum requirements on x86 platform. Can I
run FreeBSD on mz 486dx2 8Mb laptop smoothly?
Please help me by answering this simple question.
regards,
wauf
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
On Friday 14 March 2003 08:23 pm, Wizard of Wor wrote:
I was unable to find the minimum requirements on x86 platform. Can I
run FreeBSD on mz 486dx2 8Mb laptop smoothly?
The install documentation or the FAQ does have this answer, but yes you should
be able to run fine on this machine. Just
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:42:31PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
Lots of different reasons, the most likely one being that they
compiled file on the committers box.
mike
--
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
Lots of different reasons, the most likely one being that they
compiled file on the committers box.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
Lots of different reasons, the most
In the last episode (Mar 02), Cliff Sarginson said:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
More details please.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:40:43PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
I've to confess this my first serious profile session, and
i found something really strange (at least for me... =P)
see my answer to your previous posting. mcount is a function
used by profiling.
toni
--
Terror ist der Krieg der
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:36:16PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
I've to confess this my first serious profile session, and
i found something really strange (at least for me... =P)
74.4 39.2639.26 .mcount (83)
i think this is the beef: what the hell is
DAMMIT! Yet again I send it back to the sender, and not the list, if I do this
one more time, somebody have me banned.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Simple question about X
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:41:18 +0200
From: Willie Viljoen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian McCann
You shouldn't even need to configure X if you are exporting the display.
X needs to be installed merely for the support apps libraries.
Make sure your DISPLAY Variable is set to windowshostname:0 where 0 is
the number of your display (And it should be 0 by default).
Then from the command line,
libraries, but how to I get it to install?
Thanks,
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mykroft Holmes
IV
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Brian McCann
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Simple question about X
You shouldn't
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Asenchi
Sent: 03 December 2002 20:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Simple Question
What is the smallest fBSD install out there? How small of a hard drive
could you fit a good install of bsd on?
Not a problem, just
mike wrote:
Hello all, The easiest way of going about this is giving you a example. I am in /usr and i want to tar -xzvf ports.tar.gz, but i want to continue working in my shell while this process runs in the background. What would i type to make the output of that command not show but at the
On 11/6/02 1:43 AM, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wrote:
What would i type to
make the output of that command not show but at the end simply do let me know
its finished? thanks guys
tar -xzf ports.tar.gz
Turn off the verbose and to background it.
Kent
That will work
On 11/6/02 1:43 AM, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wrote:
What would i type to
make the output of that command not show but at the end simply do let me know
its finished? thanks guys
tar -xzf ports.tar.gz
Turn off the verbose and to background it.
Kent
That will work
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Paul A. Scott wrote:
On 11/6/02 1:43 AM, Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wrote:
What would i type to
make the output of that command not show but at the end simply do
let me know its finished? thanks guys
tar -xzf ports.tar.gz
Turn off the verbose
Just a shot in the dark, but how about...
# script tarout tar -xvzf ports.tar.gz
...?
Best regards,
Paul [Everlund]
Well, yes. That will work, too. Better yet, it is immune to the differences
between shells. Simpler is often better. :-)
I had hoped my explanation would lead to a
Just a shot in the dark, but how about...
# script tarout tar -xvzf ports.tar.gz
Actually, that won't work. The 'script' command will redirect the output to
a file, but it still outputs to the terminal, which is not what was
originally requested. My previous explanation is the correct
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Paul A. Scott wrote:
Just a shot in the dark, but how about...
# script tarout tar -xvzf ports.tar.gz
Actually, that won't work. The 'script' command will redirect the output to
a file, but it still outputs to the terminal, which is not what was
originally
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all, The easiest way of going about this is giving you a example. I am in /usr
and i want to tar -xzvf ports.tar.gz, but i want to continue working in my shell
while this process runs in the background. What would i type to make the output of
that command
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all, The easiest way of going about this is giving you a example. I am in
/usr and i want to tar -xzvf ports.tar.gz, but i want to continue working in my shell
while this process runs in the background. What would i type to make the output of
that
Sorry I bothered you with this question - I found all the answers in
/usr/share/sendmail/cf/README. It was not quite as hard as I expected.
Stephen
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I am using the default freebsd sendmail set up. I don't want to learn
the theory of sendmail - I just want
93 matches
Mail list logo
