On Sunday 22 June 2008 15:03:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
> I have make some changes to the kernel files and rebuild the kernel, but
> when I rebuild the kernel, it show some errors and stop rebuild. The
> question I want ask is that: Is there any file that store all these err
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
> I have make some changes to the kernel files and rebuild the kernel, but
> when I rebuild the kernel, it show some errors and stop rebuild. The
> question I want ask is that: Is there any file that sto
Hi:
I have make some changes to the kernel files and rebuild the kernel, but
when I rebuild the kernel, it show some errors and stop rebuild. The
question I want ask is that: Is there any file that store all these error
message, If there is, where can I find it?
Because there are too many errors
Uwe Laverenz schrieb:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 01:38:25PM +1200, Steven Samuel Cole wrote:
Also, the disks are SATA300, the controller supports SATA150 only; there
is a jumper on the disks that limits them to SATA150 which I removed.
Could that be relevant ?
Yes, it could be relevant. Several
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 01:38:25PM +1200, Steven Samuel Cole wrote:
> Also, the disks are SATA300, the controller supports SATA150 only; there
> is a jumper on the disks that limits them to SATA150 which I removed.
> Could that be relevant ?
Yes, it could be relevant. Several controllers have s
Hello,
I see an error message every time I boot my AMD64 FreeBSD 7.0 system or
when I restart smartd. These are the dmesg lines that seem relevant to
the issue (shortened for clarity):
kernel: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Jun 6 22:06:44 NZST 2008
kernel: CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core
Hi,
I try to set up a POPTOP on a FreeBSD 7.0 machine. so far so good, I
can connect with a client once. But when I disconnect and build up a
new connection, I am getting an error message. The clients by the way
are WinXPsp2
here is the section of the /var/log/messages:
Jun 20 12:59:14
I see in the release notes for 7.0 that experimental support for POSIX
message queues has been added. Where can I find information on what
functions are available and how they differ from the POSIX descriptions?
I would like to use them for inter-thread message passing.
Thank you,
Bob McConnell
ols: 0.29 USB communication driver - core 0.32 (2.2.1)
Using subdriver: MGE HID 1.01
Starting nut.
Network UPS Tools upsd 2.2.1
listening on 0.0.0.0 port 3493
Connected to UPS [ellipse]: usbhid-ups-ellipse
Broadcast Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(no tty) at 7:34 CEST...
Communications with U
At 04:01 AM 5/1/2008, Olivier GARNIER wrote:
There are my questions:
> Does anyone become to correct the same problem and can help me to correct
this?
> Can anyone tell my how to see the "last message" which is repeated hundred
times?
I've got an MGE ellipse 750 USBS.
On Thursday 01 May 2008 11:01:02 Olivier GARNIER wrote:
> > Can anyone tell my how to see the "last message" which is repeated
> > hundred
>
> times?
...
> Apr 30 23:16:33 myhost upsmon[1011]: Poll UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed -
> Server disconnected
>
There are my questions:
> Does anyone become to correct the same problem and can help me to correct
this?
> Can anyone tell my how to see the "last message" which is repeated hundred
times?
I've got an MGE ellipse 750 USBS.
I've connected it to my server with USB
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 12:06 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> I noticed that every sudo command I issue is accompanied
> by a "Last login" message.
>
> 25testokcns root $ls .hushlogin
> ls: .hushlogin: No such file or directory
> 26testokcns root $sudo touch .hus
> The commands always work but I would rather not get that message
> each time. Am I missing something obvious?
A quick google search will show you that it's the
${LOCALBASE}/etc/pam.d/sudo file which is the root of your "problem".
It's pam_lastlog(8) which makes the m
Interestingly enough, sudo -v doesn't cause this
message.
>Did you edit /usr/local/etc/sudoers ?
>I tried you're commands here and I don't get the Last login message.
I am not getting it on most other FreeBSD systems except
the newest 2 systems I just finished u
On Thursday 03 April 2008 01:06:37 pm Martin McCormick wrote:
> I noticed that every sudo command I issue is accompanied
> by a "Last login" message.
>
> 25testokcns root $ls .hushlogin
> ls: .hushlogin: No such file or directory
> 26testokcns root $sudo touch
I noticed that every sudo command I issue is accompanied
by a "Last login" message.
25testokcns root $ls .hushlogin
ls: .hushlogin: No such file or directory
26testokcns root $sudo touch .hushlogin
Last login: Thu Apr 3 11:38:24 from testokcns.osuokc
27testokcns root $sudo
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:13:40 +1000 Da Rock wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 13:57 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:48:46 +1000 Da Rock wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 13:37 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:52:14 +1000 Da Rock wrote:
> > > >
> >
Your mail to 'Outlook' with the subject
status
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the m
I am getting an error message when using the hp-toolbox (print/hplip)
version 2.7.12 on a FreeBSD-6.3 machine. When I start the program, this
is displayed:
Mar 10 16:49:57 scorpio python: hp-toolbox[35348]: error: Invalid
locale: C.utf8
Next, when I click on the 'Send FAX' butto
other firewalls as well.
Attack the report:
daily_status_security_loginfail_enable="NO" >>/etc/periodic.conf
Then write your own and put it in /usr/local/etc/periodic/security/. I've
written something similar with php for mail rejects, that groups sender or
hostname and er
We have a bunch of FreeBSD 6.x servers which we administer remotely. As
part of that we get the normal root job mails emailed to a mailing list
which the admins(mostly me) can inspect at leisure and also use for
historical purposes.
Trouble is many of the emails get huge because of repeated me
Your mail to 'Aacc-ccgen-div' with the subject
Message could not be delivered
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
ClamAV identified this message as a virus (Worm.Mydoom.M)
Either the message will get posted to th
Hi
when i add into /etc/rc.conf line
gdm_enable="YES" (freebsd6.3)
and my system start I see line
"Unkown username haldaemon in message bus configuration file".
I think that's little problem (for newbies big problem)
because I have to myself add haldaemon user (I did
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:37:59 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Your message to macfilmmakers awaits moderator approval
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:08:34AM +, Da Rock wrote:
>&
AIL PROTECTED]
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:42:05 -0600
> Subject: Your message to macfilmmakers awaits moderator approval
>
> Your mail to 'macfilmmakers' with the subject
>
> Mail System Error - Returned Mail
>
> Is being hel
Your mail to 'macfilmmakers' with the subject
Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you wi
Thank you for your enquiry to ECU. Your message has been received. You
should expect a response from us within 2 working days.At any time,
you can update your enquiry by clicking on "Ask Us" on the ECU
homepage.
Question Reference No080
[img1.jpg]
_
Dear Regions Customers Upgrade 2008
Due to concerns, for the safety and integrity of the Regions Bank
account we have issued this warning message.
It has come to our attention that your Regions
I have an old zv5445us HP Pavillion laptop, essentially the zv5000
model, which pauses at the /boot/kernel/acpi.ko message during boot.
It hangs there, with a non-spinning ASCII character, for about 2
minutes - then it boots. I tried entering the following commands in
to the loader.conf to no
Whenever I load up green_saver to turn off the monitor when the
console's inactive, I get a message on the console saying "kldload:
Unsupported file type". The module still loads and is active, it all
works, but there's still that message that makes it seem as though it
> On December 09, 2007 at 12:14PM Andy Dills wrote:
> Not sure where that random /sshd came from, but the "line 1" bit is a
> pretty big hint as to where the problem is ;)
>
> Andy
I wondered about that to; however, until today, I have never even opened that
file. I have no idea where if came f
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Gerard wrote:
> I just installed 'denyhosts' on a FBSD-6.2 machine. I thought I had followed
> the directions correctly, however, I continually see an error message popping
> up on the screen. This is a line fro the /var/log/auth.log file.
>
>
>
I just installed 'denyhosts' on a FBSD-6.2 machine. I thought I had followed
the directions correctly, however, I continually see an error message popping
up on the screen. This is a line fro the /var/log/auth.log file.
Dec 9 10:56:01 scorpio sshd[1477]: warning: /etc/hosts.all
whenever i do host [hostname] the following messages will appear:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ host freebsd.org
freebsd.org has address 69.147.83.40
;; Warning: Message parser reports malformed message packet.
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED
LYJI0kF Sun Nov 25 03:01:02 2007
>>> +<<<<222>2>>>NNNMNMMIII M III SIISAS SAAA 3 303,020,0 ,, EE
>>> IEIIESSSAIAA S A f ff
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +f
>>>
>>> WTF now?
>>>
>>> I'm n
0,0 ,, EE IEIIESSSAIAA S A
f ff
+
+
+f
WTF now?
I'm not sure if that's a real kernel message that got garbled or whether
I should be worried about naughtiness.
It looks like multiple messages overlapping each other. Removing 3
characters every 4 bytes in the output produce
SAIAA S
> A f ff
> +
> +
> +f
>
> WTF now?
>
> I'm not sure if that's a real kernel message that got garbled or whether
> I should be worried about naughtiness.
It looks like multiple messages overlapping each other. Removing 3
characters every 4 bytes
So I have this in my security run output:
kernel log messages:
+++ /tmp/security.hLYJI0kF Sun Nov 25 03:01:02 2007
+<<<<222>2>>>NNNMNMMIII M III SIISAS SAAA 3 303,020,0 ,, EE IEIIESSSAIAA S A
f ff
+
+
+f
WTF now?
I'm not sure if that's a real
Your mail to 'Core' with the subject
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the moderator&
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On Friday 19 October 2007 07:06:35 Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:36:27 +0300 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
..
> > > I think log_in_vain can be used when configuring a firewall.
> > > Just to see quickly if your firewall works as expect
On Friday 19 October 2007 07:06:35 Ian Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:36:27 +0300 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> > If that's the only message you get
> > you must be protected, at least packet_filtering-wise.
Here
> > I think log_in_vain can be used w
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:36:27 +0300 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007 18:39:56 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> > Thank you for the clue! We are using log in vain as part of our
> > security logging for this particular box, but this is the only message
>
"Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've basically allowed all traffic to and from 127.0.0.1 in our
> ruleset, but nothing seems to work. Does anyone have a magic bullet to
> make this go away?
set skip on lo0 is not the default, but essentially the only sane way
to go. Se
On Thursday 18 October 2007 18:39:56 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Thank you for the clue! We are using log in vain as part of our
> security logging for this particular box, but this is the only message
> I've ever seen so I'm not sure it's really needed.
It must b
Hello Nikos:
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikos Vassiliadis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> Subject: Re: Odd PF Denied Message
>
> On Thursday 18 October
On Thursday 18 October 2007 17:59:49 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> We're getting a ton of these.
>
> +Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:113 from 127.0.0.1:52655 flags:0x02
This doesn't look like a pf(4) message. This looks like
sysctl net.inet.tcp.
Hello All:
We're getting a ton of these.
+Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:113 from 127.0.0.1:52655 flags:0x02
We've basically allowed all traffic to and from 127.0.0.1 in our
ruleset, but nothing seems to work. Does anyone have a magic bullet to
make this go away?
Thanks for any help!
Reg
Hi,
On 9/27/07, vuthecuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everytime when I login to 7.0 CURRENT, this message
> repeated. Is it harmless or harmful? And how can I solve it?
> Tnx in advanced
>
> Sep 27 22:08:50 hanhnhu login: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_nologin.so: no
> pam
Everytime when I login to 7.0 CURRENT, this message
repeated. Is it harmless or harmful? And how can I solve it?
Tnx in advanced
Sep 27 22:08:50 hanhnhu login: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_nologin.so: no
pam_sm_authenticate()
Sep 27 22:08:53 hanhnhu login: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_nologin.so
Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been received.
Please keep in mind that the average order is processed in three days if all of
the necessary information is in place.
The average shipping time for domestic ground service is three to five days.
The average shipping time for international
>
> [[ Clearing my voice. ]]
>
> Well, I have all of you know that I flew over there with my
> $21,000 check in hand, and they swore on theirmother's grave that
> my FOUR HUNDRED AND TENTY-SEVEN TRILLION DOLLARS would be in my
> bank tomorrow!!
Well, I contributed t
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:37 AM, DAve wrote:
Glen Barber wrote:
Quoting Pollywog:
Okay, maybe I came off wrong, since I received approximately 4 emails
off-list about this. No, I do not reply to these emails --
well, except now.
I'm done feeding the trolls. :) Cheers
Everyone will forget all
Glen Barber wrote:
Quoting Pollywog:
On Thursday 30 August 2007 15:24:23 Glen Barber wrote:
I must reply to about 25 of these per week... but I never hear anything
back.
Why would you reply to them? You will just get added to more of their lucky
lottery lists and maybe get the list added too.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 05:21:41PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> Quoting Pollywog:
> > On Thursday 30 August 2007 15:24:23 Glen Barber wrote:
> > > I must reply to about 25 of these per week... but I never hear anything
> > > back.
> >
> > Why would you reply to them? You will just get added to mo
Quoting Pollywog:
> On Thursday 30 August 2007 15:24:23 Glen Barber wrote:
> > I must reply to about 25 of these per week... but I never hear anything
> > back.
>
> Why would you reply to them? You will just get added to more of their lucky
> lottery lists and maybe get the list added too.
>
O
On Thursday 30 August 2007 15:24:23 Glen Barber wrote:
> I must reply to about 25 of these per week... but I never hear anything
> back.
Why would you reply to them? You will just get added to more of their lucky
lottery lists and maybe get the list added too.
__
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 at 11:24 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I must reply to about 25 of these per week... but I never hear anything
back.
Stop responding to them.
No! You really need to contact th
In response to Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 at 11:24 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
>
> > I must reply to about 25 of these per week... but I never hear anything
> > back.
>
> Stop responding to them.
No! You really need to contact them to help them launder you
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 at 11:24 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I must reply to about 25 of these per week... but I never hear anything
back.
Stop responding to them.
--
_|_
(_| |
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for testing purposes. That's the
reason it exists, and it avoids spamming 1000s of subscribers.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
hi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dear folks,
whenever I try to attach gdb to my firefox settings because I'm expecting
firefox to be the source of my stability problems (I always find a gnash.core
and a firefox.core file in my home directory) I get the following error message:
gdb --quiet
(gdb) attach 11808
Attachi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Favourite worst written error message in history:
Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue.
I have always loved this one!! Who made that up!?
Someone at IBM. That's what the original IBM PC, PC-AT, and
(presumably) PC-XT displayed if the key
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, John Murphy wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
> >>reported 'This doesn't look
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, John Murphy wrote:
Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
reported 'This doesn't look like Kansas, Toto'?
I remember seeing that error message somewhere, but do not rem
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:46:52PM +0100, John Murphy wrote:
> Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
> reported 'This doesn't look like Kansas, Toto'?
I remember seeing that error message somewhere, but do not remember
where or if it
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 09:19:00AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad Perrin
> > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:39 AM
> > To: FreeBSD Questions
> > Subject: Re
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad Perrin
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:39 AM
> To: FreeBSD Questions
> Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 0
Wasn't there, once upon a time, an error message in FreeBSD which
reported 'This doesn't look like Kansas, Toto'?
Seem to recall it occurring when I deleted the directory I was 'in'.
I may have imagined it though!
--
John.
___
Anything you have actually seen is fair game.
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of doug
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 12:19 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: OT: Re: The worst error message in
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:30 AM
> To: User Questions
> Subject: Re[2]: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
>
>
> On July 04, 2007 at 09:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:14:44PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>Except that bash requires all the icky GNU utilities to build so you
> >>have to GNUify your system.
> >
> >And perl doesn't? It was GPL last I knew.
>
> The entirety of Perl falls under the GPL and Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one is going to require the installation of something that may
not be part of a base system, that something might as well be bash :)
Except that bash requires all the icky GNU utilities to build so you
have to GNUify your system.
And perl doesn't? It wa
> > If one is going to require the installation of something that may
> > not be part of a base system, that something might as well be bash :)
>
> Except that bash requires all the icky GNU utilities to build so you
> have to GNUify your system.
And perl doesn't? It was GPL last I knew.
> The s
Eduardo Viruena Silva wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Robert Huff wrote:
>> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
>>
>>> It has to be the worst written error message in history.
>>
>> Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
>>
>> S
How far do we get to go back in time? From the first online fortran compiler:
ugh1 and ugh2. In fairness these were conditions that were not supposed to
happen, but somehow they always do. In more recent times I always liked,
"invalid page fault" this perhaps as late as win98.
__
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 12:26:01PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:05:50 -0600
> Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> > >
> > > Chad Perrin writes:
> > >
> > > > Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
> > >
On July 04, 2007 at 09:53AM Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip]
> Actually perl has a lot of problems too. One of the biggest is that
> perl script writers always seem to think like you, in that perl is
> consistent across all platforms.
>
> The biggest problems I've seen with perl scripts are when
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: The worst error message in his
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Campbell
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 9:36 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
>
>
> O
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:05:50 -0600
Chad Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >
> > Chad Perrin writes:
> >
> > > Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
> >
> > Perl has not been part of the base system for several years
>
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:29:03PM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >> This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
> >> >
> >> >differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
> >> >mean rewriting parts of shell scri
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
>> >
>> >differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
>> >mean rewriting parts of shell scripts depending on whether it is
>> >going to run in BSD or Linux.
>>
>> Th
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Chad Perrin writes:
>
> > Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
>
> Perl has not been part of the base system for several years and
> was deprecated for some time before that.
Is it part of the default install with
Chad Perrin writes:
> Isn't Perl part of the base system these days?
Perl has not been part of the base system for several years and
was deprecated for some time before that.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 07:34:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
> > >
> > >differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
> > >mean rewriting parts of shell scripts depending on whether it is
> > >going to run
> >> This is actually just the difference between sh and bash ...
> >
> >differences in, say, arithmetic handling and loops can sometimes
> >mean rewriting parts of shell scripts depending on whether it is
> >going to run in BSD or Linux.
>
> That's a major argument for doing things in python or pe
protect themselves.
> -- Lenny Bruce
sh should always be sh compatible on every platform (surprisingly). It
may even be defined in one of the POSIX standards. This is why you write
shell scripts in sh, even if you prefer csh, ksh or bash as your actual
shell.
Tom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Martin McCormick wrote:
>Paul Chvostek writes:
>> This is actually just the difference between sh and bash. You'll see
>> the latter error if you type `a = 5` in bash in any OS. It just so
>> happens that most Linux distributions don't have a real sh:
>
> I kind of tho
You could make it more zen-like, perhaps:
"You are out of tune with the Universe, grasshopper. Continue your studies"
And, if everything was correct it could issue:
"awakening has been attained, entering zazen"
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: nawcom [mailt
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:44:14 -0500
Martin McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Chvostek writes:
> > This is actually just the difference between sh and bash. You'll
> > see the latter error if you type `a = 5` in bash in any OS. It
> > just so happens that most Linux distributions don't h
Paul Chvostek writes:
> This is actually just the difference between sh and bash. You'll see
> the latter error if you type `a = 5` in bash in any OS. It just so
> happens that most Linux distributions don't have a real sh:
I kind of thought that was the real issue. While
something like
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:11:56PM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
>
> #! /bin/sh
> a = 5
>
> that's enough to make it happen. Run that, and you get:
>
> a: not found
>
> Interestingly enough, if you run that same script in a
> Debian Linux environment, you get:
>
> ./testfile: line 2: a:
s to start
due to a named.conf setting or similar. sortof creates a challenge, an
adventure to find what's causing the issue yourself.
wait. i shouldn't be promoting ideas on how make things worse off on
freebsd-questions.
pardon this useless email.
-ben
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin
> McCormick
>
> Then, there is the ultimate, the "Check engine." light on the
> modern car.
Check engine - CEL
> It would be so nice if it said some indicat
n Unix systems since about
1990 and the thing I run across that makes me ready to split a
brick with my bare hands to this very day is the "not found"
message one can get in a badly written shell script such as the
following:
#! /bin/sh
a = 5
that's enough to make it happen. Run t
201 - 300 of 961 matches
Mail list logo
