On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:48:21AM -0400, David Banning wrote:
> I get the following message in my mailbox from time to time. Is it really
> necessary to keep it there? Where does it come from, and why is it
> produced?
This is created by pine and used to store folder internal data. I
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 02:48 -0400 David Banning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get the following message in my mailbox from time to time. Is it really
necessary to keep it there? Where does it come from, and why is it
produced?
It comes from the UW-IMAP server you're co
I get the following message in my mailbox from time to time. Is it really
necessary to keep it there? Where does it come from, and why is it
produced?
--
From: Mail System Internal Data <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA
Hi everybody.
> uname -a
FreeBSD thor.swedehost.com 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Sun
Aug 31 22:08:22 CEST 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THOR i386
I 've got a message in my logfiles that I don't understand.
The ip-addresses are none that I'm
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Hasse Hansson wrote:
> > icmp redirect from 65.104.98.146: 204.152.184.189 => 65.104.98.145
is 65.104.98.146 your default router? it tells you that there is
a better way to the network 204.152.184.189.
hth,
toni
--
Kann man etwas nicht verstehen, dann ur
Hi everybody.
> uname -a
FreeBSD thor.swedehost.com 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Sun
Aug 31 22:08:22 CEST 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THOR i386
I 've got a message in my logfiles that I don't understand.
odin.swedehost.com kernel log messages:
&g
gt;
> > The reason why your other MUAs work is beacuse they simply don't send
the
> > AUTH=<> token if they're not doing authenticated SMTP.
>
> Mutt talks to my local (sendmail) SMTP without incident though, unless
> I'm mistaken; it's the
7;re not doing authenticated SMTP.
Mutt talks to my local (sendmail) SMTP without incident though, unless
I'm mistaken; it's the conversation between my local sendmail and the
WebShield system at the other end. The "syntax error" message is
produced by the WebShield system. I t
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:20:11PM -0500, Gary wrote:
> > Here is what I am thinking... 1. You mentioned you can send via other
> > MUAs, pine, etc, so I am inclined to think that your SMTP auth is set up
> > properly in Sendmail... 2. Given this, I still think it could be a Mutt
> > problem.. I
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:20:11PM -0500, Gary wrote:
> Here is what I am thinking... 1. You mentioned you can send via other
> MUAs, pine, etc, so I am inclined to think that your SMTP auth is set up
> properly in Sendmail... 2. Given this, I still think it could be a Mutt
> problem.. I think you
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:05:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote:
> These are the lines that look potentially relevant from my .muttrc:
>
> set edit_hdrs # let me edit the message header when composing
Okay, thanks.
> > > So I see it as a three-pr
rror back from the WebShielded site.
> > >
> > > The above in your .muttrc file would set your envelope sender to the
> > > above address.
> > >
> > > last thought, do you have a from address in your .muttrc file?
> > >
> > > my_hdr F
nder to the
> > above address.
> >
> > last thought, do you have a from address in your .muttrc file?
> >
> > my_hdr From: Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No, but as I said in my last message, I tested the whole .muttrc
> possibility just now by disabling
ithout a .muttrc file at all, and I got
> > the same error back from the WebShielded site.
>
> The above in your .muttrc file would set your envelope sender to the
> above address.
>
> last thought, do you have a from address in your .muttrc file?
>
> my_hdr From: Doug
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote:
> > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AUTH=<>
> > > whereas mail generated from Pine or a Windows mailer looks like
> > > MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > In other words, the "AUTH=<>" only appears in Mutt-generated mail.
>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:37:41AM -0500, Gary wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:25:59PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote:
>
> > I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send
> > mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus
>
> > The difference is
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:25:59PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Lee wrote:
> I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send
> mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus
> The difference is that Mutt-generated messages' SMTP stream contains a
> line like
>
Hard to define this one fully in a subject line...
I have two FreeBSD 4.x systems running sendmail. I'm trying to send
mail to a site that recently started using the WebShield virus
protection system for incoming mail. If I send from Mutt, the mails
are refused by the WebShielded site; if I send
Hi,
using FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE on i386.
Cant't find any information about this Boot-Message:
--- snipp dmesg output ---
...
ad0: 38154MB [77520/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
acd0: CD-RW at ata0-slave PIO4
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a
hints
11, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 18:33, William Bloom wrote:
> > > > I've just installed the Evolution 1.4.4 port and I'm generally
> > > pleased,
> > > > with reservations. I've encountered the inbox per
; > > I've just installed the Evolution 1.4.4 port and I'm generally
> > pleased,
> > > with reservations. I've encountered the inbox permission problem
> > > reported in other posts to freebsd-questions, but also I've noticed
> > that
> &
gt; pleased,
> > with reservations. I've encountered the inbox permission problem
> > reported in other posts to freebsd-questions, but also I've noticed
> that
> > there seems to be a date/time formatting problem in the message
> summary
> > view that'
om wrote:
> > I've just installed the Evolution 1.4.4 port and I'm generally
> pleased,
> > with reservations. I've encountered the inbox permission problem
> > reported in other posts to freebsd-questions, but also I've noticed
> that
> > there see
t; there seems to be a date/time formatting problem in the message summary
> view that's not been mentioned in earlier posts. For that matter, I've
> seen nothing referencing this problem in the issue list at
> http://developer.ximian.org/projects/evolution. The symptom is tha
I've just installed the Evolution 1.4.4 port and I'm generally pleased,
with reservations. I've encountered the inbox permission problem
reported in other posts to freebsd-questions, but also I've noticed that
there seems to be a date/time formatting problem in the message sum
running Lone-Tar for FreeBSD as the backup software.
Today, I updated one of the machines from 4.7 to 4.8, and now for
some reason, I'm getting the following error message when trying to
run Lone-Tar.
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/lib/libcam.so.2 undefined symbol "__stdoutp"
Now in
Greetings, I have several servers running FreeBSD 4.7 and 4.8.
All are also running Lone-Tar for FreeBSD as the backup software.
Today, I updated one of the machines from 4.7 to 4.8, and now for
some reason, I'm getting the following error message when trying to
run Lone-Tar.
/usr/libex
Your mail to 'Gnu-tr-u12a' with the subject
Re: Thank you!
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notificat
Your mail to 'sudo-workers' with the subject
Re: Details
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message body is too big: 99180 bytes with a limit of 40 KB
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you wi
Attention: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
A Virus was found in an Email message you sent.
This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message
reaching it's destination.
The Virus was reported to be:
Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please update your virus scanner or contact your
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent.
This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message
reaching its destination.
The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be:
PIF files not allowed per Company security policy
I receive the following error just before root is mounted.
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 18
It looks to me like the kernel does not like the info the BIOS is
telling it about my hard drive.
I'm not experiencing any disk problems, so is this something I should
try to fix?
I'm also dual booting to window
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-08-17 23:01:54 -0700:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:50:19AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> > > I get this as well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why. Often it causes
> > > syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in user
> >
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:50:19AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > I get this as well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why. Often it causes
> > syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in user
> > with the truncated message).
>
> I think this happens af
well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why. Often it causes
> syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in user
> with the truncated message).
I think this happens after the kernel's message buffer starts rolling
over. The very first line in the dmesg output sometimes gets cut
e fragment per
> report.
> -
> kq9.net kernel log messages:
> >copeid 0x4
>
> kq9.net kernel log messages:
> >8>.
I get this as well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why. Often it causes
syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in
rnel log messages:
TEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS
-
Each of these messages looks like a valid fragment of a bootup
message, but I don't see why I should suddenly be getting these in
the security report.
Does anyone know where this stuff might be coming f
Now I get this from the moderators !
strange
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 10:00 AM
Subject: Your message to moderators awaits moderator
approval
> Your mail to 'moderators' with the subject
&
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A virus was found in an Email message you sent.
This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message
reaching its destination.
The virus was reported to be:
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support
Attention: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A virus was found in an Email message you sent.
This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message
reaching its destination.
The virus was reported to be:
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support
That seemed to work for me.
Thanks for the insight!
-Original Message-
From: Lukasz Ciazynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:52 AM
To: Schroeder, Aaron
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: FW: closed stream message when attempting portupgrade
Schroe
to do a portupgrade -ra, or a pkgdb -F, I get a
"closed stream" message and then the portupgrade kicks me back to the
command prompt. Here is my system info:
FreeBSD diabloii.qg.com 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE #1: Mon May 15
13:55:57 CDT 2023 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sy
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jun 14), P. U. Kruppa said:
> > I have to admit I have been playing around with NIS/NFS . Everything
> > seems to work fine, but I keep receiving messages like this:
> >
> > ---
> >
>
In the last episode (Jun 14), P. U. Kruppa said:
> I have to admit I have been playing around with NIS/NFS . Everything
> seems to work fine, but I keep receiving messages like this:
>
> ---
>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 21:00:00 GMT
> From: Cron
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 11:12:00PM +0200, P. U. Kruppa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have to admit I have been playing around with NIS/NFS .
> Everything seems to work fine, but I keep receiving messages like
> this:
Are you sure you have upgraded your system to 5.x correctly? This
message
Hi!
I have to admit I have been playing around with NIS/NFS .
Everything seems to work fine, but I keep receiving messages like
this:
---
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 21:00:00 GMT
From: Cron Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:38:33AM -0700, Lawrence koffer wrote:
> test
Sorry, you fail.
There is a list specifically for testing, so you don't have to pollute the
real lists. It is, now this is inspired, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Daniel Bye
PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc
PG
We just wanted to try and check if we could send to this e-mail address.
Thanks.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
test
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello,
I originally sent this to ports, but I think questions is the proper group.
This is probably a trivial fix on my end, but I have never run into this
before. When I am trying to do a portupgrade -ra, or a pkgdb -F, I get a
"closed stream" message and then the portupgrade kic
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:04:21AM +1000, Carl Morley wrote:
From: "Carl Morley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'Dancho Penev'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: How to ignore arp error message
Dat
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Murphy
Sent: Friday, 4 April 2003 09:52
To: Dancho Penev
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to ignore arp error message
Dancho Penev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 0
Dancho Penev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:14:24AM +1000, Carl Morley wrote:
>>From: "Carl Morley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 07:14:24 +1000
>>Subject: How to ignore arp err
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:14:24AM +1000, Carl Morley wrote:
From: "Carl Morley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 07:14:24 +1000
Subject: How to ignore arp error message
Hi,
I have a server on a network which is inhabited by an Intel rack-m
Hi,
I have a server on a network which is inhabited by an Intel rack-mount
box running Win2k. The Intel server has got two of it's NIC's 'teamed'
- the Intel redundant NIC method.
Problem is that to the FreeBSD box, it looks like the MAC address of
that IP address keeps changing, so I get endle
> -Original Message-
> From: Darryl Hoar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 17:35
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: help with firewall log message
>
>
> Greetings,
> what does it mean ?
> Also, is there a good reference that would all
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Darryl Hoar wrote:
> Greetings,
> I am running 4.4-stable on my firewall.
> I have set it up using www.schlacter.com
> as a guide.
>
> I keep getting this message very minute in my
> firewall log. I need to decipher this and if its
> normal, quit lo
OTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Greetings,
I am running 4.4-stable on my firewall.
I have set it up using www.schlacter.com
as a guide.
I keep getting this message very minute in my
firewall log. I need to decipher this and if its
normal, quit logging it as it's filling up my
firewall log.
here's the entry:
Mar 2
Oh gads. I'm a noob. I can't believe I forgot about that. Darn
this old age. :)
At 07:05 AM 3/19/03 +0100, mackan wrote:
Quoting Dragoncrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm looking for a simple way to allow sendmail to automatically
> email the sender
Quoting Dragoncrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm looking for a simple way to allow sendmail to automatically
> email the sender a returned message stating like "So and so is on vacation"
> or "please direct all questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" dependin
I'm looking for a simple way to allow sendmail to automatically email the
sender a returned message stating like "So and so is on vacation" or
"please direct all questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" depending on who it's
addressed to. So for example, if a message cam
.
-
This message redirect to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---
Your mail to 'netfilter' with the subject
END WebSTAT Activation Code
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you wi
nd book
from O'Reilly.)
Is it complaining because reverse lookups are not working right or
should I be looking elsewhere in DNS?
Cheers...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
ubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
of my problem...
I'm getting the following message periodically (it appears to agree with
the DHCP lease renewal.)
Can someone clue me in to what this is trying to say?
dhcpd: Unable to add forward map from T410CDT.Tom.Parquette.name to
192.168.2.100: not a zone.
When I set up dhcp on the
l. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
suspect that my problem relies on having a tcsh
as my default shell, but crontab perhaps is running a different shell.
Thanks in advance!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent to you mail with virus.
-
AVP report:
-
archive: Mail
/html suspicion: Exploit.IFrame.FileDownload
/font.bat ok.
-
This message redirect
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 20:29, Bill Moran wrote:
> You know ... I didn't think before I cced the list. *smack*
>
> I just wanted everyone to know that I had emailed a polite message
> to these folks, in case someone else was considering doing it.
I'm guessing it's be
You know ... I didn't think before I cced the list. *smack*
I just wanted everyone to know that I had emailed a polite message
to these folks, in case someone else was considering doing it.
Bill Moran wrote:
Dear Mysterious Unnamed Tech Support Person,
I frequently donate time to the Fr
.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.IP6.INT"
> in {
> type master;
> file "localhost-v6.rev";
> };
>
> I've tried changing the 'zone "." in {' to alleviate the problem but I
> can't seem to fix it. The name server is running pro
e the problem but I
can't seem to fix it. The name server is running properly and responds
to queries but the error message is bothersome and I'd like to get rid
of it. I reinstalled bind from ports just to make sure everything was up
to date too. Thanks for the help.
Mike B
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Fixed earlier today, cvsup again :)
On Saturday 22 February 2003 18:21, Steve Horan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just cvsup'd from 4.7-STABLE (built from Nov 15 2002 sources) to
> today's 4.8-STABLE sources (Feb 22 2003)
>
> The machine now refuses to boot.
>
> The
Recipient of the infected attachment: Erin Schnepf\Inbox
Subject of the message: Hi,sos!
One or more attachments were deleted
Attachment BORDER.exe was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus UNAUTHORIZED FILE was found.
<>
test with.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:34:53PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:55:12PM -0800, Nathan Kinkade wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:47:16PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > > Interesting. The source code seems pretty clear in that it only looks
> > > at the 'im' pro
Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
is has
> > prompted me to play around with pre-login messages. Using gettytab I
> > can alter the pre-login message for telnet sessions by changing the 'im'
> > capability in gettytab, but for the life of me I can't seem to get
> > telnetd to recognize the &#x
ab I
> can alter the pre-login message for telnet sessions by changing the 'im'
> capability in gettytab, but for the life of me I can't seem to get
> telnetd to recognize the 'if' capability. The console responds to both,
> but telnetd seems to ignore 'if&
s post, and i need to allow
> > > telnet access. I want a pre login message telling users to please only use
> > > telnet for BBS and to use SSH2 for shell access. FreeBSDdiary.org is down,
> > > and FreeBSD cheat sheets example has a much older GETTYTAB. Im almost
> > > p
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:45:12PM -0800, Nathan Kinkade wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:17:30PM -0500, Michael wrote:
> > Hey friends,
> > I got a BBS up as you may know from my previous post, and i need to allow
> > telnet access. I want a pre login message telling use
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:17:30PM -0500, Michael wrote:
> Hey friends,
> I got a BBS up as you may know from my previous post, and i need to allow
> telnet access. I want a pre login message telling users to please only use
> telnet for BBS and to use SSH2 for shell access. FreeBSD
Hey friends,
I got a BBS up as you may know from my previous post, and i need to allow
telnet access. I want a pre login message telling users to please only use
telnet for BBS and to use SSH2 for shell access. FreeBSDdiary.org is down,
and FreeBSD cheat sheets example has a much older GETTYTAB
init_path; *path != '\0'; path =
next) {
But this question should be asked on -current, not -questions.
Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients.
For more information, see htt
ot; in the body of the message
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Kjell wrote:
> Each time I send an email using Mutt the following message pops up on
> the screen:
>
>
> /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:113 from 127.0.0.1:1572
>
>
> What could be the cause?
>
TCP port 113 is the Auth service. When y
Each time I send an email using Mutt the following message pops up on the screen:
/kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:113 from 127.0.0.1:1572
What could be the cause?
Using a freshly loaded v4.7 running IPFW with the following in rc.conf
firewall_type="open" #wide open
Yesterday, trying to resolve a problem, we upgraded the BIOs to 1.07,
after which we started to get the BTX halted message above ... searching
the web, I've not found much in the way of solution, but the one I did see
talked about disabling teh BIOS DMA, in relation to a Compaq serve
r/log would still function.
but then, this is an old box and I don't have another hard drive to
throw in it...
I think stopping and restarting snort did the trick though.
--
David Bear
College of Public Programs/ASU
Mail Code 0803
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
an send a signal on rotating a log file.
I'm not quite sure why this is relevant to the actual problem, because
it's not really *that* many inodes involved in log files, but then
again I'm not sure I completely understand the problem anyway...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
potentialtech.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
have enough inodes?
--
David Bear
College of Public Programs/ASU
Mail Code 0803
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
oing a "mt eom" between commands makes the error go away, but I
couldn't figure out what's wrong... why was the tape frozen?
--
jimmy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
, or the tape is bad.
--
Toomas Aas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/
* No problem is so big that it can't be run away from.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
ve up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Tom Parquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Tom Parquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm getting an "Out of memory!" message from the mirror
(/usr/ports/ftp/mirror-2.9) port trying to update a large archive.
I'v
Tom Parquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Tom Parquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>I'm getting an "Out of memory!" message from the mirror
> >>(/usr/ports/ftp/mirror-2.9) port trying to update a
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 13:12, Tom Parquette wrote:
> Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Tom Parquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I'm getting an "Out of memory!" message from the mirror
> >>(/usr/ports/ftp/mirror-2.9) port trying to u
801 - 900 of 961 matches
Mail list logo
