On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:39:59PM -0500, APseudoUtopia wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on editing the kernel configuration file for a custom
kernel. The system will be running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p1. I'm
wondering about the use of the COMPAT options in the kernel config.
COMPAT_43
Well
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options
To: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:52 PM
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Gardner Bell gbel...@rogers.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options
To: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
From: APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Use of COMPAT Kernel Options
To: Gardner Bell gbel...@rogers.com
Cc: Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl, FreeBSD Questions
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Friday
+++
Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
Unable to load a kernel!
/
can't load 'kernel'
Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK _
+++
You could try loading your old kernel. When you
Hi maillist.
After applying non kernel-level patch set via freebsd-update my system after
rebooting show FreeBSD 8.0 version, not 8.0-p1. New instance of freebsd-update
check system again by checksum and show that system is already patched as -p1.
With updating i see changing of file
Hi all!
I've got a problem while upgrading FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 - FreeBSD
8.0-RELESE with freebsd-update(8).
First of all I made a copy of the most configuration files. Then I made:
# freebsd-update -r 8.0-RELEASE upgrade
All went good, except the message, that because of MYKERNEL kernel
good, except the message, that because of MYKERNEL kernel
configuration I should upgrade my kernel before freebsd-upgrade
install.
That message should probably be more strongly worded. It is absolutely
*imperative* that the custom kernel is upgraded before continuing with
freebsd-upgrade install
Hi,
I paste this link where Colin Percival explain who to use the tool
freebsd-update with custom kernel. But I think that same thing as been written
in the handbook.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=30920postcount=9
--- En date de : Jeu 26.11.09, S4mmael s4mm...@gmail.com a écrit
Hello,
I have Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode with
FreeBSD 7.2 and kernel csup'ed and build on 22 Oct using
standard-supfile. How can I find out what is the problem?
Message:
Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 11; apic id = 13
On Wed 2009-11-11 12:35:55 UTC-0600, Jason Fried (r...@churchofbsd.org) wrote:
I have a fairly old install and not much room on my ROOT is there a way to
prevent freebsd-update from installing .symbols files.
In /etc/freebsd-update.conf:
IgnorePaths /boot/kernel/*.symbols
From reading
I have a fairly old install and not much room on my ROOT is there a way to
prevent freebsd-update from installing .symbols files.
Thanks,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Sven Hazejager s...@hazejager.nl writes:
I'm having trouble getting 7.2-p4 to run. I'm using nanoBSD, either
under VMware using a virtual serial null-modem or on an Alix
Soekris-like serial-only CF-based device, both show this problem: my
serial console does not display kernel messages
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 17:52, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Checking the obvious: syslog.conf is configured to send the messages to
the console?
Haven't touched syslog.conf but this all happens before syslog is even
starting. The problem is that the console is
On 11/9/09, Sven Hazejager s...@hazejager.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 17:52, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Checking the obvious: syslog.conf is configured to send the messages to
the console?
Haven't touched syslog.conf but this all happens before syslog
All,
I'm having trouble getting 7.2-p4 to run. I'm using nanoBSD, either
under VMware using a virtual serial null-modem or on an Alix
Soekris-like serial-only CF-based device, both show this problem: my
serial console does not display kernel messages, they all go to the
VGA console!
I'm using
sorry for bothering guys, but i have a big problem here, i recently
installed freebsd on a box and i was very happy updating ports, when i
realized the system suddenly reboot, when i saw the dmesg it says:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual
Problem solved, I didn't use the proper casing on the command line. I
needed KERNCONF=ZFS, not kernconf=ZFS.
LoH wrote:
I compiled a custom kernel with ZFS enabled and installed it.
Everything appeared to work fine, then I realized that I needed to
make some more modifications (ALTQ
LoH lordofhyph...@gmail.com wrote:
I compiled a custom kernel with ZFS enabled and installed it.
Everything appeared to work fine, then I realized that I needed to
make some more modifications (ALTQ, disabling ulpt). I made those
configuration changes to the existing ZFS kernel config
I compiled a custom kernel with ZFS enabled and installed it. Everything
appeared to work fine, then I realized that I needed to make some more
modifications (ALTQ, disabling ulpt). I made those configuration changes
to the existing ZFS kernel config.
After running
make buildkernel kernconf
+++
Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
Unable to load a kernel!
/
can't load 'kernel'
Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK _
+++
so I decided to reinstall freebsd-6.4 but I can't boot and re-install
freebsd
a kernel!
/
can't load 'kernel'
Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK _
+++
so I decided to reinstall freebsd-6.4 but I can't boot and re-install
freebsd using CD-rom.
what shall I do boot my system using installed freebsd or live-CD
Unable to load a kernel!
/
can't load 'kernel'
Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK _
+++
so I decided to reinstall freebsd-6.4 but I can't boot and re-install
freebsd using CD-rom.
what shall I do boot my system using
anything untoward.
Except for the recurring console messages, which began during system
startup and have continued ever since. Here's what a few of them look
like.
Oct 28 17:00:00 hellas newsyslog[1939]: logfile turned over due to size100K
Oct 28 17:02:03 hellas kernel: VBoxDrvFreeBSDClone
.
Oct 28 17:00:00 hellas newsyslog[1939]: logfile turned over due to size100K
Oct 28 17:02:03 hellas kernel: VBoxDrvFreeBSDClone: pszName=pts
ppDev=0xe84bea14
Oct 28 17:02:36 hellas kernel: VBoxDrvFreeBSDClone: pszName=input
ppDev=0xe84e2948
Oct 28 17:02:36 hellas kernel
Is multiplying out the size and used columns from
vmstat -z completely in addition to the amount used in vmstat -m, or
do some of them overlap?
vmstat -z | sed 's,^.*:,,' | sed -E 's,^ +,,' | sed -E
's/^([0-9]+),[^,]+, +/\1*/;s/,.*$//' | egrep '^[0-9]' | bc | add
58483416
Is netstat -m accounted
If I subtract vmstat and kldstat from wired, I'm
missing approx 100M. What am I doing wrong
or what should I be adding up to find the total
mem in use by the kernel and a breakdown of
that usage? Thanks.
top -SH -d 1 1000 | egrep '^Mem:'
Mem: 114M Active, 65M Inact, 258M Wired, 468K Cache, 46M
After running cvsup and doing a buildworld, I tried to make a new kernel,
and got the following error..
On my 6.4-STABLE x86 machine, I received the following:
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
Hello.
Is it possible to get bootable cd with auto selectable amd64/i386 boot?
For instance , i have a bootable cd with two kernels:
* first is located in /boot/kernel.amd64
* second in /boot/kernel.i386
loader.conf has line /kernel=kernel.amd64/
When it boots on amd64 incompatible hardware
Daemons,
a little question.
I just compiled a nice, slim kernel on my laptop, but I dont want to carry all
the kernel sources around there.
Is it ok just to #rm the content of the /usr/src directory? And will I get it
completely back from sysinstall or the FreeBSD-servers? Or is there a more
On Sun 2009-10-04 15:15:05 UTC+0200, herbert langhans (herbert.raim...@gmx.net)
wrote:
I just compiled a nice, slim kernel on my laptop, but I dont want to
carry all the kernel sources around there.
Is it ok just to #rm the content of the /usr/src directory? And will I
get it completely
Thank you, Andrew,
clicketyclick - all source code gone now, and the config file is saved.
Can you please tell me about the issue with freebsd-update. Does it mean if I
run:
#freebsd-update fetch
#freebsd-update install
- it will overwrite my self compiled kernel? Good to know indeed!
Cheers
On Sun 2009-10-04 16:29:08 UTC+0200, herbert langhans (herbert.raim...@gmx.net)
wrote:
Can you please tell me about the issue with freebsd-update. Does it mean if I
run:
#freebsd-update fetch
#freebsd-update install
- it will overwrite my self compiled kernel? Good to know indeed!
No, I
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 03:15:05PM +0200, herbert langhans wrote:
I just compiled a nice, slim kernel on my laptop, but I dont want to carry
all the kernel sources around there.
Keep in mind that some ports (those that contain kernel modules) require the
kernel sources.
On my 7.2-RELEASE-p4
Roland Smith writes:
I just compiled a nice, slim kernel on my laptop, but I dont
want to carry all the kernel sources around there.
Keep in mind that some ports (those that contain kernel modules)
require the kernel sources.
And not just kernel modules. The popular
Building an old-style monolithic kernel, for a minimalist installation, the
symbol table file ends up being many times larger than the kernel itself.
I'd like to move it off to secondary storage, _if_ that won't break anyting.
Obviously, for crash dump analysis, one needs to have it available
Can somebody explain me the warnings of compilation?
Please, explain me, at least, first 4 lines.
Arkady Tokaev
_
Не хотите, чтобы кто-то знал, что вы делали в Интернете вчера? Вам
On Sunday, 20 September 2009 12:55:44 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:15:15 -0400, mfv mrk...@acm.org wrote:
Hello,
After rebuilding FreeBSD for many years I am not able to build a
GENERIC kernel for the last few days. It always stops when
compiling acpi.
The source
Salamo Alikom
i recompile my kernel but when i boot with the new i get this MSG :
enter the full path to bash , /bin/sh :
i try fsck or fsck -y but the problem is steal .
my CUSTOM file :
[CODE]
cpu I686_CPU
ident CUSTOM
options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler
options
in the kernel, right? Like, if I called
putenv() a in a loop and then exited the process, the kernel will
reclaim that cluster-fuck of lost allocated memory, right? (If it's a
kernel leak that would be super retarded as any process could
affectively starve the kernel of memory. ) So it's a userland
within the process which calls sentenv() or
putenv(), not a memory leak in the kernel, right?
Yes, it's a userland leak.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
help me~my configuration kernel file is failed.
my os is FreeBSD 7.2 Release
my notebook's model is Compaq Evo N150
memory ram is 311M
cpu is Intel pentium III (800.04-MHz 686-class CPU)
executig command
===
make buildkernal KERNEL=KIMHYUN_KERNEL
Kim Hyun wrote:
help me~my configuration kernel file is failed.
my os is FreeBSD 7.2 Release
my notebook's model is Compaq Evo N150
memory ram is 311M
cpu is Intel pentium III (800.04-MHz 686-class CPU)
executig command
===
make buildkernal
Hello,
After rebuilding FreeBSD for many years I am not able to build a GENERIC
kernel for the last few days. It always stops when compiling acpi.
The source code is up to date for 7 -STABLE for i386 on a amd64 cpu. I
have always been able to recompile a GENERIC kernel since release 5.1
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:15:15 -0400, mfv mrk...@acm.org wrote:
Hello,
After rebuilding FreeBSD for many years I am not able to build a
GENERIC kernel for the last few days. It always stops when compiling
acpi.
The source code is up to date for 7 -STABLE for i386 on a amd64 cpu.
I have
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
# rm -fr /usr/obj/usr
# cd /usr/src
# make cleandir ; make cleandir
I've seen serveral placeses that make cleandir should be run twice. I
dont understand why. Could somebody explain?
--
chs
___
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:10:00 +0200, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
# rm -fr /usr/obj/usr
# cd /usr/src
# make cleandir ; make cleandir
I've seen serveral placeses that make cleandir should be run twice. I
dont understand why.
the designated build{world|kernel} targets,
but cd into a directory and start typing make orquite the pitfall, run
make obj depend, rather then make obj make depend. In the first case, the
.depend file ends up in .CURDIR, not .OBJDIR.
Also, perhaps it's better to advise make cleanworld for the rm
.
The second run cleans files in the source tree itself.
Which you'll see if you don't use the designated build{world|kernel} targets,
but cd into a directory and start typing make orquite the pitfall, run
make obj depend, rather then make obj make depend. In the first case, the
.depend
Здравствуйте, Freebsd-questions.
Fatal trap 18: integer divide fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0af79b5
stack pointer = 0x28:0xc1b55cb8
frame pointer = 0x28:0xc1b55cb8
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type
. (which works fine), and then nothing,
until a login tty pops up (which also works fine). The main, if not
only, reason I want a serial console is to be able to use it for
single user mode, DDB, and so on.
All kernel messages, and all rc messages are seen only on the
graphics card; the serial
On Aug 26, 2009, at 18:04, Danny Braniss wrote:
you need to set
hint.uart.0.flags=0x10
danny
I already tried that (in /boot/loader.conf); it shows up in dmesg (and
didn't before), but still no luck.
Regards/thanks,
Thomas
___
At 12:10 PM 8/26/2009, Thomas Backman wrote:
danny
I already tried that (in /boot/loader.conf); it shows up in dmesg (and
didn't before), but still no luck.
Try adding it to /boot/device.hints
eg
hint.uart.0.at=isa
hint.uart.0.port=0x3F8
hint.uart.0.flags=0x10
hint.uart.0.irq=4
On Aug 26, 2009, at 18:16, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Or, if you want to use loader.conf, try
hw.uart.console=io:0x3f8
---Mike
That solved it! Thanks a lot!! :)
Regards,
Thomas
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Aug 23, 2009, at 23:18, Carl Chave wrote:
Did you try booting with the keyboard disconnected from the FreeBSD
machine? Perhaps the vidconsole is favored when a keyboard is
detected?
On a linux box I had, I would get serial output from Grub, lose it
during kernel load and then get a login
a login tty pops up (which also works fine). The main, if not
only, reason I want a serial console is to be able to use it for
single user mode, DDB, and so on.
All kernel messages, and all rc messages are seen only on the graphics
card; the serial console receives nothing but the /boot.config
options etc. (which works fine), and then nothing,
until a login tty pops up (which also works fine). The main, if not
only, reason I want a serial console is to be able to use it for
single user mode, DDB, and so on.
All kernel messages, and all rc messages are seen only on the graphics
card
with the FreeBSD logo,
with single-user options etc. (which works fine), and then nothing,
until a login tty pops up (which also works fine). The main, if not
only, reason I want a serial console is to be able to use it for
single user mode, DDB, and so on.
All kernel messages, and all rc messages are seen
Did you try booting with the keyboard disconnected from the FreeBSD
machine? Perhaps the vidconsole is favored when a keyboard is
detected?
On a linux box I had, I would get serial output from Grub, lose it
during kernel load and then get a login once the OS was up, much like
what you describe
My 7.2 FreeBSD server has started to crash with kernel trap 12. I googled
around and most of the topics I found were about faulty RAM or other harware
problems. This is VMware vitual machine so I see no way of hardware problems
as we even tried to move the machine around VMware nodes to see it's
Hello,
I once had a problem in linux sometimes connecting to windows file
sharing with CIFS is extremely slow. After too much searching, I
discovered the problem was a buggy kernel device driver for some lame
ethernet card I bought.
Which kernel ethernet device driver works best under
On 8/21/09, Chris Stankevitz cstankev...@toyon.com wrote:
Hello,
I once had a problem in linux sometimes connecting to windows file
sharing with CIFS is extremely slow. After too much searching, I
discovered the problem was a buggy kernel device driver for some lame
ethernet card I bought
to reboot?
MF kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.4
kes# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.4
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute
Aug 12 15:59:08 host savecore: reboot after panic: integer divide fault
Aug 12 15:59:08 host savecore: writing core to vmcore.4
How to obtain which process cause system to reboot?
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 08:01:07 Коньков Евгений wrote:
Aug 12 15:59:08 host savecore: reboot after panic: integer divide fault
Aug 12 15:59:08 host savecore: writing core to vmcore.4
How to obtain which process cause system to reboot?
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.4
--
Mel
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:49 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean
why does
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and
created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named
the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too. Later
Mark Stapper st...@mapper.nl wrote:
... PowerPC is dead ...
I suspect both IBM and Freescale would beg to differ :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Mark Stapper st...@mapper.nl wrote:
... PowerPC is dead ...
Well yes
(lousy excuse coming up!) I meant in the PC/Mac world... ;-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 14:35:40 Mark Stapper wrote:
Mel Flynn wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who
invented and created it and was for a while the only one
Now I come to think of it, isn't it
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Because people using them, new what they were doing.
And probably didn't care...
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
Itanium?
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
Yes, also Intel can fail. Intel also failed with their first 32
bit
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
Itanium?
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
do they really sell machines with this CPU in numbers?
I have not seen one in the wild.
Yes, also
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:18:09PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
Itanium?
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
do they really sell
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:49 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean
why does freebsd
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 19:07:12 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:18:09PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for
the Itanium?
The one that
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why does
freebsd use a single manufacturer's name to represent a genre?
David
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:14:49PM +0100, David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
with Intel Quad Core processors.
That depends on if you installed the amd64 version of FreeBSD or the i386
version. The kernel should
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:14:49 David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
does freebsd use a single
David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
does
freebsd use a single manufacturer's name to represent a genre
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:14:49PM +0100, David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
That depends on if you installed the amd64 version of FreeBSD or the i386
version. The kernel
David Southwell wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
does freebsd use a single manufacturer's
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and
created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named
the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too. Later Intel
also started
Hi,
I have 7.2-RELEASE running on two older laptops and both have had a
few kernel panics lately. Unfortunately the one that paniced today
doesn't have debugging symbols, so I'm sure how useful any of output
below will be.
Joey
% dmesg
.
.
.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault
After running cvsup a few minutes ago, an attempt to build a new kernel
failed with:
=== zyd (depend)
@ - /usr/src/sys
machine - /usr/src/sys/i386/include
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq
-I/usr/src
The FreeBSD Developers' Handbook describes how to get panic information (and
dig out further details).
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#KERNELDEBUG-OBTAIN
Was there any output before ad7: FAILURE - device detached? Losing the drive
in the
Hello, Im trying to compile a new kernel, but when I try to make it , I
receive the following error:
*
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TEST28JUL09.
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.*
The last MAKE that appears in the terminal was *MAKE=make sh
gula nito gulan...@gmail.com writes:
Hello, Im trying to compile a new kernel, but when I try to make it , I
receive the following error:
*
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TEST28JUL09.
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.*
The actual error
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 11:08:57 am gula nito wrote:
Hello, Im trying to compile a new kernel, but when I try to make it , I
receive the following error:
*
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TEST28JUL09.
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
***Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src
Hi guys,
I use mount_smbfs on my notebook and I have a little nasty problem..
Sometimes I have kernel panic when resuming after the suspend. The
issue seems to happen when I go to suspend with my USB network (WiFi)
adapter plugged in (I do use /etc/rc.d/netif stop rum0 before going
to suspend
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example holds HAMMER as the cpu; mine is Turion with some other
name
2009/7/21 PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca:
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example holds HAMMER as the cpu; mine
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/21 PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca:
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example
Frankly, I have no idea how to configure the kernel from GENERIC... I
have installed, in the past and recently, Intel i386 kernels without
problem but this amd64 thingy is incomprehensible for me... the default
GENERIC example holds HAMMER as the cpu; mine is Turion with some other
name
tang huu trong wrote:
Dear all.
i got a problem while complie my kernel to support PAE. below is my
process.
1 - cp /usr/src/sys/i386/GENERIC /root/kernels/MYKERNEL
2 - cd /usr/src/sys/i386
3 - ln -s /root/kernels/MYKERNEL
4 - vi /usr/src/sys/i386/MYKERNEL
5 - add line options
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:53 PM, tang huu tronghuutr...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all.
i got a problem while complie my kernel to support PAE. below is my process.
1 - cp /usr/src/sys/i386/GENERIC /root/kernels/MYKERNEL
2 - cd /usr/src/sys/i386
3 - ln -s /root/kernels/MYKERNEL
4 - vi /usr/src
Dear all.
i got a problem while complie my kernel to support PAE. below is my process.
1 - cp /usr/src/sys/i386/GENERIC /root/kernels/MYKERNEL
2 - cd /usr/src/sys/i386
3 - ln -s /root/kernels/MYKERNEL
4 - vi /usr/src/sys/i386/MYKERNEL
5 - add line options PAE
6 - save configure file.
7 - cd
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
Em Qua, 2009-07-01 às 22:40 +0100, Chris Whitehouse escreveu:
Yes you can.
put your kernel (the one that works) on a DVD/CD
assume that your rootfs on the HD is on ad0s1a, /usr is on /dev/ad0s1e
with all the /boot directory.
than boot from dvd/CD
with the HD
,
at least. But I'm hesitant to just 'call it good' - I'd like this to
be a stable server (:
I manually transcribed the bulk of the output - is there a nicer way
to get the output of a kernel panic so I can copy/paste?
I didn't find an obvious command, though I'm no FreeBSD guru. If
someone could tell me
Hi all,
I cannot boot my motherboard with the default kernel on 7.2-RELEASE (or
any other iso's I have tried). It panics if device sbp is in the kernel.
So far I've got things working by putting the hard disk in another
machine, installed the OS and rebuilt a kernel without sbp
Em Qua, 2009-07-01 às 22:40 +0100, Chris Whitehouse escreveu:
Yes you can.
put your kernel (the one that works) on a DVD/CD
assume that your rootfs on the HD is on ad0s1a, /usr is on /dev/ad0s1e
with all the /boot directory.
than boot from dvd/CD
with the HD on the machine too.
on the startup
901 - 1000 of 4710 matches
Mail list logo
