Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net writes:
I keep getting this error when trying to update source on 8.1:
TreeList failed: Error in /var/db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_8_1:
13890: Could not parse status record. Delete it and try again.
Have you tried deleting
On 6/9/12 2:43 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jim Nasbyj...@nasby.net writes:
I keep getting this error when trying to update source on 8.1:
TreeList failed: Error in /var/db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_8_1:
13890: Could not parse status record. Delete it and try again.
Have you tried
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:17:09 +0100
wayne mitchell wrote:
hey,
i have just cvsup'ed for first time (newbie)
RELENG_8_1_RELEASE
You probably want to use RELENG_8_1 which is the security branch for
the 8.1 release. RELENG_8_1_RELEASE is the version on the CD, without
any security fixes.
On 27 June 2011 17:17, wayne mitchell wayne.mitchell...@gmail.com wrote:
hey,
i have just cvsup'ed for first time (newbie)
RELENG_8_1_RELEASE
rebuilt world...
there is a problem with a particular port:
audio/libsndfile
the version in this system ports tree is 1.0.21
the set of versions
wayne mitchell wrote:
hey,
i have just cvsup'ed for first time (newbie)
Cvsup as an add-on port is actually no longer needed. Csup is cvsup
rewritten in C and is a part of the base OS now. Functionally identical.
RELENG_8_1_RELEASE
rebuilt world...
there is a problem with a particular
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:26:22PM -0400, Grant Peel thus spake:
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before deploying it
TO make sure that
RELENG_8_0
Yes. This will give you the latest 8.0 release + desired patch level
(critical security patches). This is almost certain what you want to be
running before going to production status. I mean, you could use
RELENG_8_0_RELEASE I suppose, but then the cvsup would be without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 17:26:22, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
I am trying to update my ports collection on a new server using cvsup. I've
added a mirror site to my ports-supfile, but keep getting the following
error message:
on# csup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
Parsing supfile
The csup servers do have a rate-limiting feature on them. However, I
think it gives a different error message than that. Operating not
permitted makes it seem more like a networking issue on the local
machine. Can you ping the IP? Firewall blocking outgoing ports?
I pinged a few of the mirror
John Almberg wrote:
I am trying to update my ports collection on a new server using cvsup.
I've added a mirror site to my ports-supfile, but keep getting the
following error message:
on# csup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
Parsing supfile /root/ports-supfile
Connecting to cvsup7.us.FreeBSD.org
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:13:00AM -0500, John Almberg wrote:
I am trying to update my ports collection on a new server using cvsup.
I've added a mirror site to my ports-supfile, but keep getting the
following error message:
Have you tried portsnap(8)? I find it much more convenient for
Am Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:48:39 +0200
schrieb Stevan Tiefert stevan-tief...@kabelmail.de:
Hi Stevan,
I connected to cvsup5.de.freebsd.org a long time with no errors.
Jochen
Hello list,
in the last few months more and more cvsup-servers are printing
error-messages like them:
host# csup
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having quite the issue with a cvsup-mirror install (1.3_8) here. It
seems to be keeping some meta information file somewhere and has FAILED to
give me a local mirror (not one to be publicly available) yet.
Being the
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:22:04AM +, RW wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:32:49 -0500
Troy t...@twisted.net wrote:
I'm having a problem with cvsup and it just started happening. I have
other servers on the same LAN that are having no problem connecting
to the very same servers. I found
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:32:49 -0500
Troy t...@twisted.net wrote:
I'm having a problem with cvsup and it just started happening. I have
other servers on the same LAN that are having no problem connecting
to the very same servers. I found other people that had this problem
by searching but
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i did cvsup with supfile given in example,
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile,
and set base to /var/db and prefix to /home/ncvs as suggested and then
cvsup -g -L 2 -h HOST /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile
where HOST is the one that run
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have my small box, 10.3.1.25 ip, that cvsup-ed files from repository
into
it. it use cvs-supfile in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ to
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have my small box, 10.3.1.25 ip, that cvsup-ed
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have my small box, 10.3.1.25 ip, that cvsup-ed files from repository
into
it. it use cvs-supfile in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ to collect files.
now that i want my other
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:49:04PM +0200, Yony Yossef wrote:
Hi,
I'm running cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile with all kinds of host names
from this list:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/cvsup.html#HANDBOOK-MIRRORS-CHAPTER-SGML-MIRRORS-IL-CVSUP
I get a Connection refused error.
Help..
Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:49:04PM +0200, Yony Yossef wrote:
Hi,
I'm running cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile with all kinds of host names
from this list:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/cvsup.html#HANDBOOK-MIRRORS-CHAPTER-SGML-MIRRORS-IL-CVSUP
I
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:53:02PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:49:04PM +0200, Yony Yossef wrote:
Hi,
I'm running cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile with all kinds of host names
from this list:
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:48:20 Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:53:02PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:49:04PM +0200, Yony Yossef wrote:
Hi,
I'm running cvsup -g -L 2 cvs-supfile with all kinds of
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have my small box, 10.3.1.25 ip, that cvsup-ed files from repository into
it. it use cvs-supfile in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ to collect files.
now that i want my other machine to cvsup 6.2-release source files from the
one mentioned above.
my
Gian Paolo Buono [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
from web ports I have see (
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=nagios-3stype=allsektion=all)
that is relased the version nagios-3.0.4_1 of nagios but I have on my system
the version nagios-3.0.3.
Now if i try to update nagios from cvsup I
from web ports I have see (
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=nagios-3stype=allsektion=all)
that is relased the version nagios-3.0.4_1 of nagios but I have on my system
the version nagios-3.0.3.
Now if i try to update nagios from cvsup I run the follow comands:
cd /usr/ports/ ;
On Thursday 06 November 2008 16:20:13 Johan Hendriks wrote:
cd /usr/ports/ ; make update ; make fetchindex
When the upgrade is finished, i run:
portversion -l '' -v | grep nagios
but nagios-3.0.4_1 is not present.
[cut make.conf]
cvsup18 has the latest. You're obviously having
On 10/22/08, Chris Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How risky is it to jump directly to 7.0 on a 5.5 system?
Upgrade would be by cvsup. I expect mergemaster
issues anyway but this system is relatively vanilla in
it's configuration. It's duty is just rsyncing other servers.
The kernel is
On Oct 22, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Aftab Jahan Subedar wrote:
On 10/22/08, Chris Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How risky is it to jump directly to 7.0 on a 5.5 system?
Upgrade would be by cvsup. I expect mergemaster
issues anyway but this system is relatively vanilla in
it's configuration. It's
On 2008-Oct-11 08:24:51 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
csup and cvsup function the same, and they both rely on the same source
versioning system.
Note that csup only supports a subset of cvsup functionality. The
most obvious missing feature is CVS mode.
If you really want
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:33:08PM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
Forwarding original msg to freebsd-questions mailing list.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:06:13PM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
I am trying to download 7.0 stable release through cvsup, but it fails. I
tried changing the
Forwarding original msg to freebsd-questions mailing list.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:06:13PM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
I am trying to download 7.0 stable release through cvsup, but it fails. I
tried changing the server, but still get those errors.
- ERROR ---
Checkout
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:38:26AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:33:08PM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
Forwarding original msg to freebsd-questions mailing list.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:06:13PM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
I am trying to download 7.0
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 01:21:31AM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
1) Your setup looks very custom. I see SMB/CIFS in use, and you're
using a non-standard directory for the cvsup CVS data (the default is
Yes, I am using mount_smbfs to mount a network harddrive to store all my
devel code.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 01:21:31AM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
1) Your setup looks very custom. I see SMB/CIFS in use, and you're
using a non-standard directory for the cvsup CVS data (the default is
Yes, I am using
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 02:20:52AM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Are you sure? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/cvsup.html --
see
the first Note: paragraph.
As a newbie to FreeBSD, I would rather like to
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 08:24:51AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 02:20:52AM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Are you sure? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/cvsup.html --
see
the first
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 02:41:34AM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
I am never going to do a Windows-FreeBSD mount as it is not required for me.
I rather go for extra space on my FreeBSD box. Is there any method to
increase
the size of my FreeBSD partition??
Do you mean partition as in I
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 02:41:34AM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 08:24:51AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 02:20:52AM +0530, Shakul M Hameed wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Are you sure?
Or...contact the maintainer:
http://www.dslreports.com/profile/191119
$ host cvsup1.ca.FreeBSD.org
cvsup1.ca.FreeBSD.org is an alias for less.cogeco.net.
less.cogeco.net has address 24.226.6.67
http://less.cogeco.net/
Many broken URLS.
~BAS
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On September 12, 2008 12:09:12 pm Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I found this
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-MIRRORS
and it lists one for me in Canada.
cvsup1.ca.freebsd.org
Unfortunately, it doesn't have RELENG_6 on
Try downloading the binary packages for 7.0 that you need and install
them. That would be fastest.
FreeBSD doesn't claim to maintain binary (library?) compatibility across
major releases. I personally have never had a problem, but I consider
that dumb luck.
Regards,
Jason
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I receive every time:
Cannot connect to cvsup17.us.FreeSD.org: Connection refused
I would appreciate anyone's suggestion on what to try.
signed: perplexed.
Try netcat or telnet to see what you get when a connections to cvsupd
is initiated...
I found a local firewall
Jim Pazarena [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a bank of 8 servers, all which do cvsup regularly for ports.
I am recently going thru an upgrade to FreeBSD 7.0, and in a cvsup
with server #5, I get :Connection refused
I cannot figure out why this machine would be refused, when the other
4
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:57:49PM -0600, Chris typed:
NOTE: I don't use mergemaster unless I go from say 6.3 to 7.0
Not wise. New features and fixes are applied to configuration files and
rc scripts regu;arly. You'll probably miss them.
STABLE is the security fix branch.
Wrong. According to
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:41:24AM -0500, Gerard wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:57:49 -0600
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming you went from 6.3-RELEASE to 6.3-STABLE and also assuming you
do not have customization in /etc - here's what I do...
After a cvsup of the src tree
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:45:30AM -0500, Gerard wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:14:59 +0100
Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{snip]
Going to single user mode is the less important part of rebooting.
The other part is that after the reboot you will be running the *new*
kernel which
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:14:59 +0100
Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{snip]
Going to single user mode is the less important part of rebooting.
The other part is that after the reboot you will be running the *new*
kernel which might possibly be needed for a successful installworld.
It is
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:57:49 -0600
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming you went from 6.3-RELEASE to 6.3-STABLE and also assuming you
do not have customization in /etc - here's what I do...
After a cvsup of the src tree (ensuring I want the STABLE branch
(*default release=cvs
On Friday 01 February 2008 00:47:12 Allen wrote:
Now, this wouldn't work for some reason or another, but the system
seemed to be doing just fine. I did uname -a and sure enough I had
6.3 Stable going. However, when typing kdm to load up that so I can
use a gui, it no longer loads, at all, it
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:12:43 +0100
Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:57:49PM -0600, Chris typed:
23.2.2.1 What Is FreeBSD-STABLE?
FreeBSD-STABLE is our development branch from which major releases
are made. Changes go into this branch at a different pace, and
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:47:12 -0500
Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've been reading over my library of FreeBSD books, which I may add is
impressive due to me buying EVERY book available on Freebsdmall and
also buying the PowerPak to make sure my Library is complete, and
also I've
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 02:21:42 + (UTC)
Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-02-01, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:47:12 -0500
Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've been reading over my library of FreeBSD books, which I may
add is impressive
On 2008-02-01, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:47:12 -0500
Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've been reading over my library of FreeBSD books, which I may add is
impressive due to me buying EVERY book available on Freebsdmall and
also buying the PowerPak to
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 03:43:21PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
I see folks talking about building snd_hda on 6.2, but when I cvsup,
/usr/src/sys/modules/sound/driver/hda doesn't exist. I'm using an
unmodified (except for the url) standard-supfile, which has src-all
in big letters uncommented
Steve Franks wrote:
I see folks talking about building snd_hda on 6.2, but when I cvsup,
/usr/src/sys/modules/sound/driver/hda doesn't exist. I'm using an
unmodified (except for the url) standard-supfile, which has src-all
in big letters uncommented at the top, so I find the lack of anything
SF == Steve Franks writes:
SF I see folks talking about building snd_hda on 6.2, but when I cvsup,
SF /usr/src/sys/modules/sound/driver/hda doesn't exist. I'm using an
SF unmodified (except for the url) standard-supfile, which has src-all
SF in big letters uncommented at the top, so I
Hugo Silva wrote:
Hello,
I've set up a local cvsup mirror for a freebsd server farm but I'm
having some trouble making it work.
I went with all the defaults on the install, only skipping gnats www
and mail.
The initial update went well, took awhile but I have all files in
place now.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow.
If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to
have 'src-all?
*default host=cvsup9.freebsd.org *default base=/usr *default
prefix=/usr
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:34:19 -0500
Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow.
If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to
have
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 10:39 +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I have setup cvsup-mirror with default settings and I have some questions:
1. What cvsup host should I use as my upstream (cvsup.master.freebsd.org
[if I got the name wrong sorry but see next sentence] is an invalid name
according
Hi Aryeh,
two things:
1) is your clock set correctly? I received your mail *very * out of
order on the mailing list.
The time is right but the TZ is wrong everytime I attempt to correct the
TZ the time gets readjusted... specifically my clock says:
Tue Oct 16 11:10:33 UTC 2007
right now
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them at the same time if you don't mind the IO and
network traffic:
csup /path/to/ports-supfile csup /path/to/src-supfile
--
Mel
Thanks Mel,
for the ports-supfile, for the tag, should I use '.' or RELENG_6_2
Reqading the documentation I am little confused.
-Grant
- Original Message -
From: Mel
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: CVSup
Umm not sure why you think you cant becuase i do it now
just
have
src-all
ports-all
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 13:03 +0200, Mel wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:52:03 Grant Peel wrote:
I have three servers running FreeBSD 6.1
I want to update them tonight, and am wondering which tag to use.
I want them to upgrade to the latested released version of 6.2 (not cutting
edge).
tag = RELENG_6_2
That's 6.2-RELEASE +
Umm not sure why you think you cant becuase i do it now
just
have
src-all
ports-all
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 13:03 +0200, Mel wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them
Mel wrote:
On Saturday 01 September 2007 12:31:33 Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Can I use
src-all and ports-all in the same supfile?
Nope. But you can update them at the same time if you don't mind the IO and
network traffic:
csup /path/to/ports-supfile csup /path/to/src-supfile
On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:56:31 Jim Stapleton wrote:
I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
get it working.
I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put
0.9.36 back. I
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:56:31 -0400
Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
get it working.
I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39
David Coder wrote:
i'm finding that cvsup comes up empty in trying to update the port tree from
cvsup2 cvsup3 (haven't tried others). is there something wrong w/ them or
have i missed a crucial turn of events?
The ports are being frozen due to Xorg integration[1]. Just hang on for
a few
On Thursday 17 May 2007, David Coder said:
i'm finding that cvsup comes up empty in trying to update the port
tree from cvsup2 cvsup3 (haven't tried others). is there
something wrong w/ them or have i missed a crucial turn of events?
The ports tree is in a freeze state right now pending the
David Coder wrote:
i'm finding that cvsup comes up empty in trying to update the port tree
from
cvsup2 cvsup3 (haven't tried others). is there something wrong w/
them or
have i missed a crucial turn of events?
Beyond what others have said about the 'freeze', it may be advisable
that you
://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-requirem
ents.html
-Original Message-
From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2007 17:55
To: Anthony Human
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror supfile configuration for specific source
Anthony Human
Don't top-post, please.
Anthony Human [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the response.
However, I'm trying to avoid having to download the entire cvs tree
considering I only need the source 5.5 Release or 6.2 Release. The ports
tree would be great as well.
Well, you can certainly do
Anthony Human [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently we have quite a number of servers running either 5.5 Release
or 6.2 Release. I would like to configure a BSD box as a cvsup-mirror to
serve our internal servers. I am doing this to hopefully save both time
and bandwidth when updating.
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports
to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?
Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD
(tag=.).
HTH,
Joe
___
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD,
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is
no such things as stable or current ports?
Simon
Joe Holden wrote:
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to
Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD,
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is
no such things as stable or current ports?
Simon
Joe Holden wrote:
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD
Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD,
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there
is no such things as stable or current ports?
Simon
Joe Holden wrote:
Simon Gao wrote:
Hi,
I have some machines running FreeBSD
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then
may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such
things as stable or current ports?
You got the right answer the first time. You will get the
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:06:37PM -0800, Michael wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm building a production server and I have what may seem to be a very
simple question so I hope it only requires a simple answer.
As I've studied the FreeBSD Handbook as well as the man pages for this,
it's still
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:06:37PM -0800, Michael wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm building a production server and I have what may seem to be a very
simple question so I hope it only requires a simple answer.
As I've studied the FreeBSD Handbook as well as the man pages
On 2/11/07, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:06:37PM -0800, Michael wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm building a production server and I have what may seem to be a very
simple question so I hope it only requires a simple answer.
As I've studied
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 03:41:58PM -0800, Michael wrote:
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:06:37PM -0800, Michael wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm building a production server and I have what may seem to be a very
simple question so I hope it only requires a simple answer.
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 03:41:58PM -0800, Michael wrote:
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:06:37PM -0800, Michael wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm building a production server and I have what may seem to be a very
simple question so I hope it
On 2/11/07, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now getting back to my original question, if you
are running a production server, does it make sense to pull down ports
which are under the -CURRENT tag=. or should anyone who's running a
production server just stick with what's in the current release
Cy Schubert wrote:
What is a CVSup Touch? What is it? (A touch, right?) Why does it happen?
What triggers it?
e.g.
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/files/patch-main.mk,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-descr,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-plist,v
I have a CVSup that's been running here for 15
On Friday 02 February 2007 07:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Cy Schubert wrote:
What is a CVSup Touch? What is it? (A touch, right?) Why does it
happen? What triggers it?
e.g.
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/files/patch-main.mk,v
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/pkg-descr,v
Touch
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kent Stewart writes:
On Friday 02 February 2007 07:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Cy Schubert wrote:
What is a CVSup Touch? What is it? (A touch, right?) Why does it
happen? What triggers it?
e.g.
Touch ports/devel/makeplus/files/patch-main.mk,v
Touch
Charlie McElfresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line
ports-all
in my cvs_supfile
After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
before, notably php5-cgi, were
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line
ports-all
in my cvs_supfile
After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.
I'd appreciate being
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:20:03AM -0800, Charlie McElfresh wrote:
After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.
Check out Freshports: http://www.freshports.org/commits.php
This gives you an overview of recently
php5-cgi hasn't been a separate port for some time. Try make config in
lang/php5.
~BAS
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Charlie McElfresh wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line
ports-all
in my cvs_supfile
After the
Dak Ghatikachalam wrote:
Hi world
I am working on performing the kernel upgrade using cvsup ,
my file cvsup-standard file is looking like
*default host=cvsup2.us.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_1
*default delete use-rel-suffix
On 1/27/07, Joe Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dak Ghatikachalam wrote:
Hi world
I am working on performing the kernel upgrade using cvsup ,
my file cvsup-standard file is looking like
*default host=cvsup2.us.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default
On Jan 18, 2007, at 10:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server,
like
this:
Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org
Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused
...
i have change many cvsup server ,
In the last episode (Jan 18), Firas Kraiem said:
The title says it all, when I try to run CVSup to update my ports
collection (6.2-RELEASE), I get a core dump error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cvsup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
Parsing supfile /root/ports-supfile
Connecting to cvsup.fr.FreeBSD.org
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:52:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server, like
this:
Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org
Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused
...
i have change many cvsup server , all
1 - 100 of 626 matches
Mail list logo
