On Saturday 30 May 2009 14:50:31 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
Bind9 started in chroot:
root 7880.0 0.1 3156 1004 ?? Ss Fri01AM 0:02.10
/usr/sbin/syslogd -l /var/run/log -l /var/named/var/run/log -s
bind30792 0.0 1.2 16212 12864 ?? Is4:10PM 0:00.23
Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
Hello,
I have setup FreeBSD recently, can somebody help me with one interesting
thing - Bind9 slave DNS server, everything is works great, but I got a
problem with extended logging of xfer, etc.
Bind9 started in chroot:
root 7880.0 0.1 3156 1004
named_enable=YES
named_program=/usr/sbin/named
named_chrootdir=/var/named
-Mike
After adding these options on my system, named didn't start at boot.
Manully attempt to start it via '/etc/rc.d/named start' brought to the
following error:
/etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_command: cannot
On Saturday 30 May 2009 17:01:17 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote:
The named running chrooted has no clue about /var/named. You can either
use ducttape:
cd /var/named/var sudo ln -s .. named
or just strip /var/named from your config file, hence use
/var/log/xfer.log.
--
Mel
This
Well it is possible - but what information it can give me?
Could you explain - just to know if this 2 hours is acceptable for this.
Check DELL website for more info - but generally tests the harwrare
componnents..
Peter
___
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any better.
If by lots you mean 2 minutes for a reboot, I'd be inclined to agree.
--
Kirk Strauser
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any better.
If by lots you mean 2 minutes for a reboot,
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any
better.
If
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 13:24:59 Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Mel wrote:
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote:
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of
downtime for OP
- Original Message
From: Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org
To: freebsd-questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:07:25 PM
Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
- Original Message
From: Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org
To: freebsd-questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:07:25 PM
Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on).
All latest version from ports.
After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 times a day
with no reason. We think what it is a hardware
- Original Message
From: Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org
To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wearab...@yahoo.ca; FreeBSD Questions
Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:45:46 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950
Abdullah
Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on).
All latest version from ports.
After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 times a day
with no reason. We think what it
Hi,
Try updating to lastest version:
BIOS
RAID Controller BIOS
RAID Controller Firmware
Peter
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on).
All latest version from ports.
After start a
Peter wrote:
Hi,
Try updating to lastest version:
BIOS
RAID Controller BIOS
RAID Controller Firmware
Do you think it can be a problem?
It is possible to test it some how?
This host is really far away from me.
--
Best regards,
Proskurin Kirill
___
Michael Toth wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on).
All latest version from ports.
After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 times a day
with no reason. We think what it is a
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Michael Toth wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on).
All latest version from ports.
After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 times a day
with
Michael Toth wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Michael Toth wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on).
All latest version from ports.
After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 01:02:00 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Because there are many bugs were in 7.0 and got fixed in 7.1, and maybe you
are affected by one of them.
Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of downtime
for OP without any certainty that
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Peter wrote:
Hi,
Try updating to lastest version:
BIOS
RAID Controller BIOS
RAID Controller Firmware
Do you think it can be a problem?
It is possible to test it some how?
This host is really far away from me.
Last 3 months I had issues will DELL 1650 and DELL
Peter пишет:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Peter wrote:
Hi,
Try updating to lastest version:
BIOS
RAID Controller BIOS
RAID Controller Firmware
Do you think it can be a problem?
It is possible to test it some how?
This host is really far away from me.
Last 3 months I had
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Michael Toth wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Michael Toth wrote:
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Hello all.
What we have:
Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it.
It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on).
All latest version from ports.
After start a production use
mail# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/megarc
mail# make install clean
=== megarc-1.51 is marked as broken: Running megarc seems to cause
memory corruption.
We have a PR open on that -
ports/130326:
This is a listing of my hardware, I probably should have listed it in my
earlier post.
Hardware:
Motherboard: A7N8X-E Deluxe
socket A (462)
Chipset: Northbridge: NVIDIA nforce2 spp ultra400
Southbrdige nvidia nforce2 MCP-T
memory ddr 184pin (maximum of 3x184)
I have kingston kvr400x64c3ak 512mb
Hopefully I am posting to the correct list...Or should I be posting to
freebsd-stable?
--- On Wed, 14/1/09, T D ttd...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
From: T D ttd...@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009, 6:58 AM
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:46:54PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 2:09 PM -0800 1/4/09, David Christensen wrote:
I have changed the root shell to Bash on another machine I use as a CVS
server and haven't noticed any issues yet, but I've been wondering if
I'm setting myself up for
David Christensen dpchr...@holgerdanske.com writes:
freebsd-questions:
I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=miscportname=amand
a-server
Most of my software background is GNU/Linux. I would prefer using
At 2:09 PM -0800 1/4/09, David Christensen wrote:
I have changed the root shell to Bash on another machine I use as a CVS
server and haven't noticed any issues yet, but I've been wondering if
I'm setting myself up for problems by doing so.
Does anybody know if it's okay to change the root
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Kalpin Erlangga Silaen
kal...@muliahost.com wrote:
Dear All,
we face problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top command
output:
-
snip
-
We realized that all cacti process just eat my cpu and memory (STATE: pfault)
and my server
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Kalpin Erlangga Silaen
kal...@muliahost.com wrote:
Dear All,
we face problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top
command output:
-
snip
-
We realized that all cacti process just eat my cpu and memory (STATE:
pfault) and my server
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:09:03PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
freebsd-questions:
I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=miscportname=amand
a-server
Most of my software background is GNU/Linux. I
Does anybody know if it's okay to change the root shell?
A topic of debate, but yes it is okay to change the root shell, but
there are some things to know...
Some people fret about the idea that shells like bash are not on the
root partition and are usually dynamically linked to libraries which
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:09 PM, David Christensen dpchr...@holgerdanske.com
wrote:
freebsd-questions:
I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386:
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=miscportname=amand
On Thursday 04 December 2008 03:06:34 Da Rock wrote:
I have just installed FreeBSD 7.0 on a laptop I just cleaned up. It used
to run Fedora linux (I have a tv card which used to work on it, but now
I can't get the drivers to work again), and it got very cluttered and
started getting issues.
On Thursday 04 December 2008 19:51:59 Da Rock wrote:
snip provided info
Why would I install a beta when I'm mainly interested in stable
releases?
That's why I asked. You're not in a position to troubleshoot this problem,
since the usual suspects (wrong driver, signs of significant acpi
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
368 vs 372 is that the 64 bit is compiled for 64 bit, and uses a little more
space.
/ Ebbe
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
I never googled it before, but 2 sec gave me
So use the amd64 ;)
Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386?
yes
Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after
initial install and way in the production usage ??
no.
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
___
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?
Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb;
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG -
Johan Hendriks wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD
=?windows-1250?Q?Ott_K=F6stner?= writes:
I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD on my desktop, just
because of Nvidia drivers.
Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to
expect 64 bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is
the problem with
Nvidia drivers.
Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit
Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia?
Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?
because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
There
Nvidia drivers.
Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit
Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia?
Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?
because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)
They
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Johan Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
Nvidia!!!
No Nvidia
My box is a web/mail/vpn/router/samba (yes i know there shouldn't be
that many services
on the box, but tell my boss that) and all the apps are working like a charm.
his money his problem. overspending on hardware it's quite common, instead
of paying more employees with the same money.
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are
Pieter Donche wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are
Thank you both for the very detailed description.
It's nice to get my suspicion about boot sequencing confirmed :-)
When I installed the system yesterday (I think I'll try a re-install today
based on your input) I observed however that all the slices I made appeared
to be bootable.
As originally
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:03:58PM +0100, Jonatan Evald Buus wrote:
Greetings,
I tried to install FreeBSD 7.0 on an old server earlier today and ran in to
a number of issues related to slicing and labeling the disk using fdisk.
The drive in the machine is a 40GB Seagate Barracude (ST34001A)
Hi Jerry,
Thank you for the swift and very thorough response.
If I understand you correctly, then I should only create 1 slice of the
entire disk (seeing as FreeBSD will be the only OS) using fdisk and then
partition the slice using bsdlabels from sysinstall?
Previously I was aiming for 5 slices,
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:07 +0100, Jonatan Evald Buus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If I understand you correctly, then I should only create 1 slice of the
entire disk (seeing as FreeBSD will be the only OS) using fdisk and then
partition the slice using bsdlabels from sysinstall?
Yes, that's the
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:41:07PM +0100, Jonatan Evald Buus wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Thank you for the swift and very thorough response.
If I understand you correctly, then I should only create 1 slice of the
entire disk (seeing as FreeBSD will be the only OS) using fdisk and then
partition the
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:10:48AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
freebsd-questions:
Try freebsd-ports for this question, as your issue is with a port. :-)
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking
--- On Sun, 10/26/08, David Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find
-lgio-2.0
To: Freebsd-Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 2:10 PM
mdh wrote:
The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version, then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other software.
Thank you for your response. :-)
Here's my attempt to carry out your suggestions:
20081026-122203 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
# portsnap
David Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mdh wrote:
The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version,
then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other software.
Thank you for your response. :-)
Here's my attempt to carry out your suggestions:
David Christensen wrote:
mdh wrote:
The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version,
then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other
software.
Thank you for your response. :-)
Here's my attempt to carry out your suggestions:
20081026-122203
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Do these ellipses include a 'make install'? Otherwise, that is likely
your problem; devel/glib20 is not actually installed.
Michael Powell wrote:
If you previously had glib20-2.14.6 installed, you will need to do a 'make
deinstall' prior to 'make reinstall'.
...
then
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:01 PM, David Christensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Do these ellipses include a 'make install'? Otherwise, that is likely
your problem; devel/glib20 is not actually installed.
Michael Powell wrote:
If you previously had glib20-2.14.6
David Christensen wrote:
[snip]
devel/glib20 and gio-fam-backend seemed to go okay. I think I got
further into firefox3, but it failed:
checking for cairo = 1.6.0 freetype2 fontconfig... Requested 'cairo =
1.6.0' but version of cairo is 1.4.10
This is telling you the cairo you have
Write failure on transfer!
(wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)
Unable to transfer the GENERIC distribution from acd0
I'm a bit of a n00b too. There's a whole host of things that have
given me that issue - bad cd drive, scratched disk, etc.
More importantly, I've seen sysinstall never actually
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 01:58:41PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
Write failure on transfer!
(wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)
Unable to transfer the GENERIC distribution from acd0
I'm a bit of a n00b too. There's a whole host of things that have
given me that issue - bad cd drive,
Mungyung Ryu wrote:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.orgHi freeBSD users,
I've developed couple of server applications on Windows platform with ACE
Proactor
and it worked quite well. But, because of the expensive Windows Server,
I wanna move to Linux or freeBSD.
Recently, I'm considering to
Quoting Christer Hermansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Joseph Olatt wrote:
Hello,
I have tried installing the following versions of FreeBSD:
- 7.0 Release
- 6.2 Release
- 6.1 Release
on an ACER Aspire AM1640-U1401A computer and the install program is not
detecting the SATA hard drive.
Does
Make sure your buildworld /usr/obj is updated. Good idea is to erase your
/usr/obj and buildworld again before going on with the jails.
fc
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:28 PM, gahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
I am trying to build jails on 7.0 system and got errors:
thanks for the advice.
it worked out after i did make world ... first, then make installworld ...
it doesn't work if one just do make installworld ...
best
--- On Wed, 9/10/08, Primeroz lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Primeroz lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: freebsd 7.0 and jail
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:28:09AM -0700, gahn wrote:
Hello:
I am trying to build jails on 7.0 system and got errors:
/
Installing everything
--
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1
still seeing really slow download speeds. I then decided to see if something
was wrong with the system by downloading the same image from the same source
that I downloaded on linux in order to bootstrap freebsd and the speed
difference was appaling. It had downloaded at 10.29 MB/s. Once freebsd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 11:21 AM
To: David Polak
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0
adapter
David Polak wrote:
[snip]
try setting up speed and duplex options manually
I have set the duplex to full-duplex and it has increased the speed to
about 200kb/s on the same file.
As far as phy support, I guess I really don't know, but the drivers for
the chipset have been around for a
Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have
a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb
sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is
still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver
should perform better.
Alternatively, to avoid
Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have
a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb
sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is
still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver
should perform better.
Alternatively, to
2008/8/8 Elwell, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry about the premature sending. Here is the complete question:
Greetings,
I am attempting to follow the directions located at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/virtualization-guest.html
and load a FreeBSD Xen DomU instance. The
Sorry about the premature sending. Here is the complete question:
Greetings,
I am attempting to follow the directions located at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/virtualization-guest.html
and load a FreeBSD Xen DomU instance. The document says:
Download the FreeBSD domU
I have a working config for non-HVM systems, its stable enough to play with but
not for production, if you have however a HVM machine, FreeBSD runs great
under linux KVM
On Friday 08 August 2008 22:46:11 Elwell, Richard wrote:
Sorry about the premature sending. Here is the complete question:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:04 PM, OutBackDingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a working config for non-HVM systems, its stable enough to play with
but
not for production, if you have however a HVM machine, FreeBSD runs great
under linux KVM
What host OS are you using for dom0? I'm
CentOS 5.2
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:04 PM, OutBackDingo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=postpost=18896047i=0
wrote:
I have a working config for non-HVM systems, its stable enough to play
with but
not for production, if you have however a HVM machine, FreeBSD
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:43:07 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
CC:
Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement.
Hello
I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0
but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware requirement?
I
ketan tada wrote:
Hello
I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0
but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware requirement?
I have laptop(celeron 1.4, 256 ram) so Can you suggest me which verson is
suitable for my hardware.
Thanks and Regards,
Ketan.
You
Im using 7.0 on my Dell Latitude C400 and works very fine (Pentium3
1.2, 256 ram). Sure, because I'm sometimes paranoic about performane
even with slow machines, I'm using xfce.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:43, ketan tada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I've tried to find hardware requirement for
On 2008.07.24 17:49:56, Benjamin Adams wrote:
Hello everyone. I'm running a website (http://www.FreeBSD-World.com/) When
the RAM is used up and moves to inactive the pages stop loading 100%.
Pages will stop halfway and sometimes I will get a display of what is in the
httpd.access log.
Just
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Robert Heron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I use:
FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM onboard.
BIOS version - 88 (the latest)
Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024)
And FreeBSD reports only:
real
Robert Heron wrote:
Hi,
I use:
FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM
onboard. BIOS version - 88 (the latest)
Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024)
You generally shouldn't touch MAXMEM as it's autotuned.
And FreeBSD reports only:
real memory
At 2008-07-05T13:04:19+02:00, Robert Heron wrote:
FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM
onboard. BIOS version - 88 (the latest)
Kernel includes: options MAXMEM=(6*1024*1024)
And FreeBSD reports only:
real memory = 2680160256 (2556 MB)
avail
Hello,
You might try the 64bit FreeBSD, I think your system is 64bit capable.
That has much higher limits on memory addressing and should get around
the issue.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Robert Heron wrote:
Hi,
I use:
FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM
onboard. BIOS version - 88 (the latest)
Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024)
And FreeBSD reports only:
real memory = 2680160256 (2556 MB)
avail memory = 2617892864 (2496
use amd64
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, Robert Heron wrote:
Hi,
I use:
FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM onboard.
BIOS version - 88 (the latest)
Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024)
And FreeBSD reports only:
real memory = 2680160256 (2556
I'm not sure about getting FreeBSD to recognize the camera; but if it has a
removable memory card, you should be able to access it through a memory card
reader.
Best regards,
Andrew
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:40 PM, chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know how to get FBSD 7-R to recognize my
* chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-06-27 13:40:59+]:
Anyone know how to get FBSD 7-R to recognize my Canon S3 IS and
download pics from it?
Nowadays mostly everyone gets a cheap (less than $10US) USB card reader
and reads it that way.
Thomas
___
A little more info -
I now have gphoto2 recognizing and downloading my images, but only in a
terminal window. I am using XFCE and want to create a shortcut on the
toolbar or the desktop that will open a terminal window and run the
command. I have a shortcut set up but it just opens a terminal
Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the
command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are
downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as
root. Whats the workaround?
Thanks.
chip wrote:
A little more info -
I now have gphoto2
chip wrote:
Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the
command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are
downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as
root. Whats the workaround?
Thanks.
chip wrote:
A little more info -
I now have
Ryan Coleman wrote:
chip wrote:
Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the
command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are
downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as
root. Whats the workaround?
Thanks.
chip wrote:
A little
chip wrote:
Ryan Coleman wrote:
chip wrote:
Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the
command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are
downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as
root. Whats the workaround?
Thanks.
chip wrote:
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
