System Administrator
Working and Playing with FreeBSD since 2002
From: sub...@80386.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:06:56 +0530
To: dhanes...@hotmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking IP Address Issues : NetBSD on Xen VM
On 03-Jul-2012, at 12:34 PM, dhaneshk k
On 04/07/2012 05:52, dhaneshk k wrote:
Please ignore my previous mail with the same subject line because there was
a terrible formatting mistake.
Please see the attached pdf which briefs the problem in assigning the IP
address to the netbsd virtual machine.
The Xen VM is running on
On 03-Jul-2012, at 12:34 PM, dhaneshk k wrote:
The Same problems
discussed here were faced.
Any hints to solve these issues much appreciated.
No hints till you learn how to format your email properly, a basic requirement
when posting to a mailing list.
Thank you
You are welcome.
the attached document for detailed description.
Any hints much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Dhanesh
From: sub...@80386.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:06:56 +0530
To: dhanes...@hotmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking IP Address Issues : NetBSD on Xen VM
Sounds like you are narrowing down the culprit(s). Also note that it could
possibly be a timing issue related to the order things start up. If
the NATD
is attempting to start before the interface has come up it will die.
/etc/rc.d/natd has no REQUIRE section, so it is indeed possible for it
to
On 9. 11. 2009 1:27, umage wrote:
When the connection goes down and comes back up it will take 5 minutes
before my FreeBSD gateway box checks the lease and decides if a
renewal is
in order. This is automatic. If I am sitting in front of my computer
and I
want to speed this up I issue
umage wrote:
[snip]
In my case the router does get the renewed ip, as I described earlier.
However, even after waiting 8+ hours, the system will not recover from
the outage properly (reason unknown). That's what this thread is all
about.
When I started the system today, I found that again it
When the connection goes down and comes back up it will take 5 minutes
before my FreeBSD gateway box checks the lease and decides if a
renewal is
in order. This is automatic. If I am sitting in front of my computer
and I
want to speed this up I issue /etc/rc.d/netif restart on the gateway
Have you tried restarting routing?
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
I have found the same symptoms with other outages and not performing the
above.
I have done /etc/rc.d/netif restart and /etc/rc.d/routing restart.
Wtih using these commands, I have found this to be successful in restoring
network
On 7. 11. 2009 19:07, Jason wrote:
Have you tried restarting routing?
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
I have found the same symptoms with other outages and not performing the
above.
I have done /etc/rc.d/netif restart and /etc/rc.d/routing restart.
Wtih using these commands, I have found this to
umage wrote:
On 7. 11. 2009 19:07, Jason wrote:
Have you tried restarting routing?
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
I have found the same symptoms with other outages and not performing the
above.
I have done /etc/rc.d/netif restart and /etc/rc.d/routing restart.
[snip]
Thank you for the
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:19:04 -0600
Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have, for some time, been able to ssh into my father's FreeBSD
machine in the Road Runner network in Central New York. Last night,
I tried so that I could fix a problem for him and ssh timed out. No
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have, for some time, been able to ssh into my father's FreeBSD machine in
the Road Runner network in Central New York. Last night, I tried so that I
could fix a problem for him and ssh timed out. No
Jefferson wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question and a problem, i installed freebsd v. 6.1 on my desktop
and my networking card doesn't work with freebsd... I have a Onboard Intel
Nineveh 82566DM (10/100/1000 Mbit).
Somebody please could help me, how can i install this network card and
make work
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:53:13AM -0200, Jefferson wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question and a problem, i installed freebsd v. 6.1 on my desktop
and my networking card doesn't work with freebsd... I have a Onboard Intel
Nineveh 82566DM (10/100/1000 Mbit).
Somebody please could help me, how
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:53:13AM -0200, Jefferson wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question and a problem, i installed freebsd v. 6.1 on my desktop
and my networking card doesn't work with freebsd... I have a Onboard Intel
Nineveh 82566DM (10/100/1000 Mbit).
Somebody please could help me, how
Hiya,
On Thursday 04 October 2007 14:03:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 5.3 installation which currently has about 5000 'ESTABLISHED' TCP
connections. That figure quadruples in the evening.
Are there any sysctls that I should be tweaking to handle lots of TCP
connections?
2 things
On 10/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 13:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: confirm 3454f2d8611cde291b81fa177d2434593f5e6d36
What a great way of stating my non-idiot credentials :)
___
Nah..youre just
This is more a windows problem and specific more a WINS/NETBios/name
resolution problem.
Do you got a dns server? Some kind of domain?
What I understand from your story the following happens: Client queries on
netbios level; who is \\computername to the masterbrowser list, can't find
on local
You can use ipf or ipfw as firewall to create a set of rules, allowind and
denying access to different resources from/to different network. Also you
can use ipnat to make NAT translation if needed.
Personally I'd advice you to use ipf as packet filter, ipfw as traffic
shaper and ipnat for NAT.
From: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:26:15 -0500
On 8/2/05, Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/3/05, Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet
|
| |WANs 1-4, 192.168.2/24, 192.168.3/24, 192.168.4/24,
192.168.5/24
Firewall -- DMZ 192.168.1/24 - Pixel, httpd, samba
|
|
HQ LAN 192.168.0/24
Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via
Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip addressing]
because of security.
Head Office
I have 3
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip addressing] because of
security.
Head
From: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
But AFAIK, By Placing all these network cards in the Same Machine,
FreeBSD Will Bridge All Those Networks.
FreeBSD is well-behaved in terms of security. It will not act as a layer-2
bridge or as a layer-3 IP router/firewall, unless and until you tell it to do
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:38:27 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
But AFAIK, By Placing all these network cards in the Same Machine, FreeBSD
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very Much for your quick response.
You're welcome.
I am familar with firewalling, but i never done something like this.
Mabee you can give me an actual Example from my reference.
Using my networks ect.
Sure, if I had lots of free time and nothing
On 8/2/05, Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via
Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:26:07 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very Much for your quick response.
You're welcome.
I am
On 8/2/05, Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:26:07 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:56:47AM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:
I have used the 'smbclient' from Samba to access my WinXP computers from
my FreeBSD computer. I have also used 'sharity-light'.
Does anyone know of any other full featured networking tool that I can
use to access my WinXP boxes.
On 12/31/04 13:51:21, Skylar Thompson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:56:47AM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:
I have used the 'smbclient' from Samba to access my WinXP computers
from
my FreeBSD computer. I have also used 'sharity-light'.
Does anyone know of any other full featured networking
If you have more than one computer available, try linking up a switch to
your second Ethernet card and running a test between two machines that
should not touch the gateway. What's your internal LAN speed when the
gateway is not involved? That will tell you whether it's the gateway you
need to
On Jun 1, 2004, at 2:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is this: How would I set something up to perform the same
functionality, as when I had windows? I'm just not sure what needs to
be
installed on either system? Any ideas or comments would be great!
FreeBSD supports mounting
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two computers systems in my network. The first system is a headless
FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. This system stores my mp3's, datafiles and runs mysql and
apache. I recently, got rid of windows off my laptop and installed FreeBSD
5.2.1. When I had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two computers systems in my network. The first system is a headless
FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. This system stores my mp3's, datafiles and runs mysql and
apache. I recently, got rid of windows off my laptop and installed FreeBSD
5.2.1. When I had windows on the
http.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Networking w/ FreeBSD
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two computers systems in my network. The first system
Henrik Zagerholm wrote:
Hi all!
Installing 5.2 on my new box with an integraded Intel PRO 1000 CT NIC.
System detects it as em0 but I cant get it to work. I'm trying dhcp
and I have added the line: ifconfig_em0=DHCP in rc.conf but I still
get this problem.
em0: Watchdog Timeout ---Resetting
IF
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Henrik Zagerholm wrote:
Hi all!
Installing 5.2 on my new box with an integraded Intel PRO 1000 CT NIC.
System detects it as em0 but I cant get it to work. I'm trying dhcp
and I have added the line: ifconfig_em0=DHCP in rc.conf but I still
get this problem.
Hi!
I do have the same problem with my Intel Gigabit onboard NIC. The system
detects it, but it doesn't work. Do you also get watchdog timeouts??
I traced it down to a PCI interrupt problem.
dmesg:
pcib2: could not get PCI interrupt routing table for \\_SB_.PCI0.CSAB -
AE_NOT_FOUND
: Rob G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: Networking Questions
On Saturday 10 April 2004 01:54 pm, Rob G Rob G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to the list, but I have tried researching the archives and
couldn't find exactly what I am looking
On Saturday 10 April 2004 01:54 pm, Rob G Rob G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to the list, but I have tried researching the archives and
couldn't find exactly what I am looking for and would like your
opinion on how to do this:
I have a 4Meg DSL connection with Multiple Static
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Steve Ireland wrote:
The two interfaces are on different subnets: 192.168.0.0/24 and
192.168.10.0/24. You need to either add a static route between them
or change their netmasks to at least a /21.
Huh? They _must_ be on different subnets. You can't route one subnet
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
I have a friend who can not get his FreeBSD 5.2 server to act as a
gateway, from the internal network we can ping the external network
card, but no further. From the server we can ping the entire world.
I had him bring it over and set up my server
- Original Message -
From: Kathy Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 19:46
Subject: Networking problem UPDATED
I have a friend who can not get his FreeBSD 5.2 server to act as a
gateway, from the internal network we can ping the external
That should have been /20 not /21.
Sorry,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Kathy Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 19:46
Subject: Networking problem UPDATED
I have a friend who can not get his FreeBSD 5.2 server to act as a
gateway, from
I was wondering. What is an easy, and good programe to use. To network
my FreeBSD and Win98box.
Depends on what you mean to network. To just hook them together
you don't need anything on the FreeBSD side. If you want to be able
to mount a network drive on the win box, then run Samba on
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Earl wrote:
I was wondering. What is an easy, and good programe to use. To network
my FreeBSD and Win98box.
how do you plan to connect these two boxes?
Are they both already on your LAN and each box
can ping the other?
What is your goal? Samba quickly comes to mind
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:57:09 +0100
Simon Barner [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably wrote:
Hello Ivan,
As I'm about to create a kind of a WAN in my area, and I'm having a
specific problem, a friend adviced me to install FreeBsd. Problem is
that this WAN would be connected to the internet with
Hello Ivan,
As I'm about to create a kind of a WAN in my area, and I'm having a
specific problem, a friend adviced me to install FreeBsd. Problem is
that this WAN would be connected to the internet with 1Mbit/s
connection, and what I want is that connection to the Internet is
shared to other
Hello Bryan Cassidy,
You might save yourself some trouble by buying a very
cheap ready-to-go appliance router like the NR041 for
$32.99 from Buy.com:
http://www.buy.com/retail/product_jump.asp?sku=10329936SearchEngine=yaSearchTerm=10329936Type=1103Category=Compdcaid=17194
I carry one to client
Which machine, FreeBSD or XP, is connected to the Internet? If it is XP
select 'share internet connection' in the advance settings for the
network settings to make XP the gateway for the FreeBSD machine. Then in
/etc/rc.conf add (or modify)
defaultrouter=ip.to.xp.box
and in /etc/resolv.conf make
At 10:55 AM 10/24/2003, Sandbox Video Productions wrote:
I would like a tutorial on how to newtork freebsd to
windowsXP via linksys modem. i can ping the windowsXP
but i can't connect nor can i install mozilla. it
seems that it's not connecting to the internet. the
handbook gives good descriptions
Try the FreeBSD Handbook at freebsd.org.
Adam
Axl Rose wrote:
trying to use fbsd as firewall and router to internet w/ win982nd behind
firewalll.
whats a good place for doc to do this or maybe examples???
_
Add photos to your
There's a dialup firewall howto here...
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/dialup-firewall/index.html
if you have cable or dsl, try reading these
http://www.defcon1.org/html/Networking_Articles/networking_articles.html
Lots of resources are out there. I use ipfilter and ipnat
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Tkachenko, Artem N wrote:
Hi,
I posted similar question some time ago but I guess I misstated the problem.
I will be more careful this time. Here is my situation:
Node A - LAN1 - Node B - LAN2 - Node C
Why can't you just set a static route on both Node
Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
+-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
| On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
| Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
| loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
|
| This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
|
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the otherside
is connected to a micropic web server and its address is 192.168.2.3. Thats
when it returns, the ping: sendto: Network dropped connection on reset.
I believe that a reset
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
+-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
| On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
| Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the
local | loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
|
|This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't
+-- Bryan W. Maxwell [18-06-03 07:45 -0700]:
| Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats all
| good.
eth0? AFAIK, eth0 is not used in FreeBSD. It is used in
Linux. Which OS are you using?
Regards,
Shantanu
--
Want to know how many
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:45:43AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Bryan W. Maxwell, and lo! it spake thus:
Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats all
good. But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the otherside
is connected to a micropic web server
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:45:43AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Bryan W. Maxwell, and lo! it spake thus:
Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats
all good. But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the
otherside is connected to a micropic web server
Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0,
192.168.2.0 is not a valid IP address. The last number must be somewhere
between 1 and 254 (inclusive).
but somehow the local
loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
The loopback address is always 127.0.0.1. It's not supposed to
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
127.0.0.1. Also, you might want to use 192.168.0.2 instead of
192.168.2.0.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:51:59PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus:
192.168.2.0 is not a valid IP address. The last number must be somewhere
between 1 and 254 (inclusive).
Well, just to be anal about it... false.
192.168.2.0 is a perfectly valid IP address in
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:50:23AM -0800, Hunt, William F wrote:
Where can I find networking drivers for Intel silicon?
Source code for most current networking chipsets can be found in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/pci/
With very few exceptions drivers for all devices
It partially depends on how the 5 switches and one hub are connected to each
other. If they 5 of the devices all connect into one central device, you're
probably safe, but if one is connected to the other and on and on, you will
have problems.
The problem is propogation delays when the devices
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:47, Christophe Simon wrote:
Hi,
For one week, I have the responsability to administrate a LAN in a society
where there's at least 5 swithes and 1 hub connected together in chain. I
heard that plugging too many hubs or swithes in chain can cause
69 matches
Mail list logo
