Re: Linux-firefox does not start

2012-08-09 Thread Bernt Hansson
On 2012-08-09 10:02, Manish Jain wrote: Hi, I installed www/linux-firefox from ports (FreeBSD 8.2/amd64). The first time it ran, it did some checks. During this time there was an unexpected power loss. Since then whenever I try to start linux-firefox, I get the error message "An instan

Re: Linux-firefox does not start

2012-08-09 Thread Thomas
012 13:32:02 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I installed www/linux-firefox from ports (FreeBSD 8.2/amd64). The > > first time it ran, it did some checks. During this time there was an > > unexpected power loss. Since then whenever I try to start > > linux-

Re: Linux-firefox does not start

2012-08-09 Thread Ahmed Ossama
Your profile might have been damaged while it was being checked and the power loss occurred. Try $ mv .mozilla/firefox/ .mozilla/firefox.bak and start firefox again. On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:32:02 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: Hi, I installed www/linux-firefox from ports (FreeBSD 8.2/amd64). The

Re: Linux-firefox does not start

2012-08-09 Thread Jeff Tipton
On 08/09/2012 11:02, Manish Jain wrote: Hi, I installed www/linux-firefox from ports (FreeBSD 8.2/amd64). The first time it ran, it did some checks. During this time there was an unexpected power loss. Since then whenever I try to start linux-firefox, I get the error message "An instan

Linux-firefox does not start

2012-08-09 Thread Manish Jain
Hi, I installed www/linux-firefox from ports (FreeBSD 8.2/amd64). The first time it ran, it did some checks. During this time there was an unexpected power loss. Since then whenever I try to start linux-firefox, I get the error message "An instance of firefox is already. Close it or re

Re: printing from inside Linux firefox

2010-12-06 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Dan Strick wrote: My printer setup is not borked. All postscript files other than those produced by firefox (e.g. those produced by enscript or groff -Tps) work just fine. My printer may be a little strange. I am not sure its postscript interpreter is precisely correct.

Re: printing from inside Linux firefox

2010-12-06 Thread Dan Strick
On Sat 4 Dec 2010, Frank Shute responded to my previous question: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:22:34PM -0800, Dan Strick wrote: > > > > ... > > > > I tried printing to a file, but both the Linux and FreeBSD Firefox > > programs create slightly strange postscript and pdf files which seem > > to dis

Re: printing from inside Linux firefox

2010-12-06 Thread Dan Strick
flashplugin-mozilla port does indeed seem to be the wrong port and the nspluginwrapper port mentioned in the FreeBSD Handbook does indeed work, but there were a couple of glitches: 1) The plugin was installed in $HOME/.mozilla/plugins where Linux firefox executables also find it and then choke on

Re: printing from inside Linux firefox

2010-12-04 Thread Frank Shute
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 07:22:34PM -0800, Dan Strick wrote: > > I am running FreeBSD release 8.1. I normally run a Linux Firefox > (currently version 3.5.15) because I need the flash plugin > (/usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10). I also need to print web pages > on occasio

Re: printing from inside Linux firefox

2010-12-04 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Dan Strick wrote: I tried /usr/ports/www/firefox which installs as firefox3, a native FreeBSD Firefox program. It will print via lpr, but It won't do flash. Actually, it will. I tried the flashplugin-mozilla port, but it just causes a segmentation violation when I visit

printing from inside Linux firefox

2010-12-03 Thread Dan Strick
I am running FreeBSD release 8.1. I normally run a Linux Firefox (currently version 3.5.15) because I need the flash plugin (/usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10). I also need to print web pages on occasion but the Linux Firefox does not recognize the printers attached to my system. It writes

Re: Printing from linux-firefox

2010-08-01 Thread Wayne Sierke
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 15:00 +0930, Malcolm Kay wrote: > Having trouble getting flshh to work with native firefox, > I decided to try one or other of the linux versions. > > With > linux-firefox-devel-3.5.9 > I was able to get flash wworking OK. > But the linux version

Printing from linux-firefox

2010-07-25 Thread Malcolm Kay
Having trouble getting flshh to work with native firefox, I decided to try one or other of the linux versions. With linux-firefox-devel-3.5.9 I was able to get flash wworking OK. But the linux version does not find any any printer access. I am using (traditional) lpd for spooling to a Postscript

Re: Why Linux Firefox doesn't play flash movies?

2010-02-15 Thread Bruce Cran
On Monday 15 February 2010 13:53:27 Alexandre L. wrote: > I can play Youtube movies using Firefox 3.5.x or Firefox 3.6, and > linux-f10-flashplugin10 10.0r45. > > I followed the tutorial : http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=5786 There are also good instructions at http://www.freebsd.org

Re : Why Linux Firefox doesn't play flash movies?

2010-02-15 Thread Alexandre L.
> Objet: Why Linux Firefox doesn't play flash movies? > À: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Lundi 15 Février 2010, 2h58 > In order to enable Flash I installed > linux-firefox-devel-3.5.7 and > linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r45. > They together pulled whole lot of other

Why Linux Firefox doesn't play flash movies?

2010-02-14 Thread Yuri
In order to enable Flash I installed linux-firefox-devel-3.5.7 and linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r45. They together pulled whole lot of other ports, see list below. But flash still doesn't work: youtube.com shows black windows instead. I tried windows firefox under wine, but it has a lot of

Re: linux-firefox

2009-11-05 Thread Frank Shute
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:22:53AM -0800, Christopher Chambers wrote: > > Hi, > > I have ran into a problem that I haven't encountered yet. I'm in > process of reinstalling BSD after a hardware failure. I was using > www/linux-firefox-devel at first because I wanted ve

linux-firefox

2009-11-03 Thread Christopher Chambers
Hi, I have ran into a problem that I haven't encountered yet. I'm in process of reinstalling BSD after a hardware failure. I was using www/linux-firefox-devel at first because I wanted verision 3. After discouving www/linux-firefox has been changed from 2 to 3, I uninstalled the dev

How to make flash plugin work in linux-firefox

2008-06-10 Thread Yuri
I have linux-firefox-2.0.0.14 installed. I also downloaded install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz from Adobe site, unpacked and placed libflashplayer.so into: /usr/local/lib/linux-firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so But firefox (/usr/local/bin/linux-firefox) doesn't pick it up and flash

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-15 Thread Robert Huff
Andrew Pantyukhin writes: > > > This dead body is beaten every other day. Personally, I download > > > flash movies and watch them with mplayer. > > > >I know about youtube-dl; is there a generic method for doing > > this with other Flash content? > > www/xpi-unplug > www/xpi-vid

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-15 Thread Tino Engel
Latter looks like overkill :-) If you *really* need watch flash9 movies in browser, using WINE with Firefox and FlashPlayer9 can be reasonable choice. Yuri Thanks, that works... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd

Re: linux firefox

2007-11-13 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:17:11PM +0100, Tino Engel wrote: > Andrew Pantyukhin schrieb: >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:38:22AM +, Tino Engel wrote: >> >>> Dear FreeBSD folks, >>> >>> I have a weird problem: >>> >>> linux-firefox

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-13 Thread Tino Engel
Andrew Pantyukhin schrieb: On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:45:42PM +, Tino Engel wrote: Dear all, Any help concerning the topic as follws would be very appreciated. freebsdangel# uname -a FreeBSD freebsdangel.de 7.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 #0: Sat Nov 10 20:15:45 UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: linux firefox

2007-11-13 Thread Tino Engel
Andrew Pantyukhin schrieb: On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:38:22AM +, Tino Engel wrote: Dear FreeBSD folks, I have a weird problem: linux-firefox and linux-firefox-devel behave the same way. When I quit them, and try to restart them, they complain about beeing already running. I have to

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-13 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:06:29PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > Andrew Pantyukhin writes: > > > This dead body is beaten every other day. Personally, I download > > flash movies and watch them with mplayer. > > I know about youtube-dl; is there a generic method for doing > this with other

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-13 Thread Robert Huff
Andrew Pantyukhin writes: > This dead body is beaten every other day. Personally, I download > flash movies and watch them with mplayer. I know about youtube-dl; is there a generic method for doing this with other Flash content? Robert Huff

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-12 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:02:01 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:45:42PM +, Tino Engel wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Any help concerning the topic as follws would be very appreciated. > > > > freebsdangel# uname -a > > FreeBSD freebsdangel.de 7.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-12 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:45:42PM +, Tino Engel wrote: > Dear all, > > Any help concerning the topic as follws would be very appreciated. > > freebsdangel# uname -a > FreeBSD freebsdangel.de 7.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 #0: Sat Nov 10 20:15:45 > UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/sr

Re: linux firefox

2007-11-12 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:38:22AM +, Tino Engel wrote: > Dear FreeBSD folks, > > I have a weird problem: > > linux-firefox and linux-firefox-devel behave the same way. > When I quit them, and try to restart them, they complain about beeing > already running. > >

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Tino Engel
Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tino Engel wrote: Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Tino Engel wrote: > freebsdangel# setenv PATH "${PATH}:/usr/compat/linux/lib" you are looking for LD_LIBRARY_PATH You should do this with ldconfig so its there all the time; but use the linux compat one, not the freebsd base system one. The port should have done this for you. cat /compat/linux/e

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tino Engel wrote: > Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >>> I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right >>> now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, >>

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Tino Engel
Aryeh M. Friedman schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, which does not work on many sites. To get Flash 9, you need to use wine under freebs

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > > I posed a similar question on this list a short time ago. Right > now, the only 'Flash' working on either Linux or native is Flash 7, > which does not work on many sites. To get Flash 9, you need to use > wine under freebsd and install the win

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-12 Thread Mark Moellering
pluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. > > It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody > installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. > > So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I > would be better off simply installing

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-11 Thread icantthinkofone
tter off simply installing the Linux-firefox? Is that easier? More likely to work? http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html > cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 ; make install clean There is now: cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f7 ;

Re: Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-11 Thread Tino Engel
Maybe for the Konqueror problem, changing the http proxy version would do. Anyone know where the configuration for this resides? Tino Engel schrieb: Dear all, Any help concerning the topic as follws would be very appreciated. freebsdangel# uname -a FreeBSD freebsdangel.de 7.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.0-

Neither linux-firefox nor linux-opera uses java plugin

2007-11-11 Thread Tino Engel
Dear all, Any help concerning the topic as follws would be very appreciated. freebsdangel# uname -a FreeBSD freebsdangel.de 7.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 #0: Sat Nov 10 20:15:45 UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 freebsdangel# It seems that this browser-plugin st

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Chuck Robey
tter off simply installing the Linux-firefox? Is that easier? More likely to work? http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html > cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 ; make install clean There is now: cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f7 ; make i

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Yuri Pankov
't work. >>>>> >>>>> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody >>>>> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. >>>>> >>>>> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Tino Engel
it didn't work. It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? Is that easier? More likely to w

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-10 Thread Tino Engel
n which you should use instead -- its newer :) btw, you don't need both native and Linux Firefox. Native Firefox an do flash just fine. ___ Well, how can it? I cannot build linuxpluginwrapper, it alway fails saying: ===> linuxpluginwrapper-

linux firefox

2007-11-10 Thread Tino Engel
Dear FreeBSD folks, I have a weird problem: linux-firefox and linux-firefox-devel behave the same way. When I quit them, and try to restart them, they complain about beeing already running. I have to manually delete /usr/compat/linux/root/.mozilla/firefox/*.prpfile/lock /usr/compat/linux

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Boris Samorodov
efox. > >> > >> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I > >> would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? > >> > >> Is that easier? More likely to work? > > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/ques

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread icantthinkofone
to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox?

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread icantthinkofone
to use the linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox?

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. >> >> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody >> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. >> >> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I >> would

Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
x27;t work. > > It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody > installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. > > So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I > would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? &g

flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper

2007-11-09 Thread John
n reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? Is that easier? More likely to work? Does it perform almost as well as the

Re: linux-firefox+flash=crash

2007-09-18 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 22:32:51 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > I haven't seen a single bit of flash in months on any of my > desktops. Would youtube make me more productive? Possibly, but I > have to doubt it... I'm sure this is message is classified as productive. -- Mel

Re: linux-firefox+flash=crash

2007-09-18 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:41:08AM -0400, Lisandro Grullon wrote: > Thank you Mel, > I guess is tie to start looking into a different direction > hence Macromedia do not want to open the code for us, I will > give swfdec a try and see if the lag time is good enough for me > to play animate pages. T

RE: linux-firefox+flash=crash

2007-09-18 Thread Lisandro Grullon
reebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:27:02 +0200 > Subject: Re: linux-firefox+flash=crash > > On Tuesday 18 September 2007 15:36:00 Lisandro Grullon wrote: > > Well, I have tried both plugins 7 and 9, they both seem to be giving me > > difficulties, I try

Re: linux-firefox+flash=crash

2007-09-18 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 15:36:00 Lisandro Grullon wrote: > Well, I have tried both plugins 7 and 9, they both seem to be giving me > difficulties, I try installing from ports/packages, but still the same > issues. So far, swfdec (graphics/swfdec and the plugin www/swfdec-plugin) is the only

RE: linux-firefox+flash=crash

2007-09-18 Thread Lisandro Grullon
list. Lisandro Grullon > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:38:25 +0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: linux-firefox+flash=crash > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:25:18AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote: > > hi a

Re: linux-firefox+flash=crash

2007-09-18 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:25:18AM -0400, kalin mintchev wrote: > hi all > > i wanted to put linux-firefox because i read somewhere it can use the > flash plugin. so i got the the linux-firefox on. the thing downloaded and > installed the plugin through the browser plugin inter

linux-firefox+flash=crash

2007-09-18 Thread kalin mintchev
hi all i wanted to put linux-firefox because i read somewhere it can use the flash plugin. so i got the the linux-firefox on. the thing downloaded and installed the plugin through the browser plugin interface. now every time i go to youtube (or any other flash site) the browser crashes

Re: linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-17 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:08:12 + beni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is basicaly for the plugins, yes. Flash, mplayer,... all working fine here with native... _ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But, this wasn't it." Groucho Mar

Re: linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-17 Thread beni
; > > > > > > After updating xorg to 7.3 (and adding a new ServerFlags section to > > > > my /etc/X11/xorg.conf to put "ignoreABI" to "on" to get kdm back), > > > > now my linux-firefox does not start any more. It dies with the > > &

Re: linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-17 Thread beni
On Monday 17 September 2007 02:54:23 Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:51:08 + > > beni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm running 6.2-Stable with linux-firefox 2.0.0.6. > > I'm curious... do you mind if I ask why are you using linux-firef

Re: linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-17 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
on to > > > my /etc/X11/xorg.conf to put "ignoreABI" to "on" to get kdm back), now my > > > linux-firefox does not start any more. It dies with the following error : > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/beni]$ linux-firefox > > >

Re: linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-16 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:51:08 + beni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm running 6.2-Stable with linux-firefox 2.0.0.6. I'm curious... do you mind if I ask why are you using linux-firefox? if it is due to flash, it works just as well with native firefox. (and yes, i went ove

Re: linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-16 Thread beni
uot;on" to get kdm back), now my > > linux-firefox does not start any more. It dies with the following error : > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/beni]$ linux-firefox > > /home/beni/.gtkrc-2.0:12: Unable to find include file: "~/.gtkrc.mine" > > The program &

Re: linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-15 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 02:51:08PM +, beni wrote: > Hi, > > After updating xorg to 7.3 (and adding a new ServerFlags section to > my /etc/X11/xorg.conf to put "ignoreABI" to "on" to get kdm back), now my > linux-firefox does not start any more. It dies wit

linux-firefox dies after xorg update

2007-09-15 Thread beni
Hi, After updating xorg to 7.3 (and adding a new ServerFlags section to my /etc/X11/xorg.conf to put "ignoreABI" to "on" to get kdm back), now my linux-firefox does not start any more. It dies with the following error : [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/beni]$ linux-firefox /hom

Re: Re: Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-06 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/7/07, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 08:49:16PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 1/6/07, Abdullah Al-Marrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 1/6/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 1/6/07, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Just fo

Re: Re: Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-06 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 08:49:16PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 1/6/07, Abdullah Al-Marrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 1/6/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 1/6/07, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Just for reference, you meant the Dec 2006 questions archi

Re: Re: Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-06 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 06:28:44PM +0300, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > On 1/6/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 1/6/07, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Just for reference, you meant the Dec 2006 questions archive, right? > > > >This topic seems to be discussed every month

Re: Re: Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-06 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/6/07, Abdullah Al-Marrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/6/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/6/07, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just for reference, you meant the Dec 2006 questions archive, right? > > This topic seems to be discussed every month here. I think i

Re: Re: Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-06 Thread Abdullah Al-Marrie
On 1/6/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/6/07, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just for reference, you meant the Dec 2006 questions archive, right? This topic seems to be discussed every month here. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.

Re: Re: Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-06 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 1/6/07, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just for reference, you meant the Dec 2006 questions archive, right? This topic seems to be discussed every month here. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Re: Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-06 Thread Sunnz
Just for reference, you meant the Dec 2006 questions archive, right? 2007/1/7, Jurjen Middendorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:00:31AM +1100, Sunnz wrote: >Just wondering, if flash only works with linux-firefox; or if it works >with FreeBSD port of firefo

Does Flash only works with linux-firefox?

2007-01-04 Thread Sunnz
Just wondering, if flash only works with linux-firefox; or if it works with FreeBSD port of firefox? Cheers. -- sunnz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any

Re: GTKMozEmbed with linux-firefox

2006-10-29 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:21:42 +0800 "Sherry Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am a newbie and maybe I do not know how to answer your question. but I > just follow the FreeBSD handbook chapter 6 [6.2.3 Firefox Mozilla, and Java > plugin] and have the flash plugin installed. (please keep the lis

Re: GTKMozEmbed with linux-firefox

2006-10-29 Thread Sherry Zhang
, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone, I use www/linux-firefox as my standard browser, as www/firefox doesn't support flash. /etc/make.conf has WITH_MOZILLA=firefox WITH_GECKO=firefox I am trying to install devel/devhelp, and I bumped into these issues: 1)

GTKMozEmbed with linux-firefox

2006-10-29 Thread Norberto Meijome
Hi everyone, I use www/linux-firefox as my standard browser, as www/firefox doesn't support flash. /etc/make.conf has WITH_MOZILLA=firefox WITH_GECKO=firefox I am trying to install devel/devhelp, and I bumped into these issues: 1) it requires ${LOCALBASE}/lib/${MOZILLA}/compo

Re: linux-firefox

2006-08-31 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:59:17 -0400 Pete C wrote: > did a 'make install' for linux-firefox I got an error that > libXfixes.so.3 (as part of linux-glib2, IIRC) could not be found . . . > after some googling and a few bad leads for some reason I did another > make install and g

Re: linux-firefox

2006-08-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:18:49 -0400 Pete C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:59:17 -0400 > > Pete C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> did a 'make install' for linux-firefox I got an error that > >> libXfixes

Re: linux-firefox

2006-08-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:59:17 -0400 Pete C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > did a 'make install' for linux-firefox I got an error that > libXfixes.so.3 (as part of linux-glib2, IIRC) could not be found . . . > after some googling and a few bad leads for some reason I did

linux-firefox

2006-08-30 Thread Pete C
did a 'make install' for linux-firefox I got an error that libXfixes.so.3 (as part of linux-glib2, IIRC) could not be found . . . after some googling and a few bad leads for some reason I did another make install and got no errors . . . but now linux-firefox won't run becau

linux-opera and linux-firefox

2006-08-13 Thread Jim Segrave
I've recently moved to FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE (RELENG_6_1). I've cvsupped my ports tree Aug 9, 10:12 UTC. I removed all linux ports, deleted /compat/linux, then tried an install of /usr/ports/www/linux-opera and /usr/ports/www/linux-firefox. Both installed without any errors or warning and

[SOLVED] Re: linux-firefox + proper Java support

2006-07-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:00:39 +1000 Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello everyone, > I'm running linux-firefox on FBSD 6.1-i386. I also have diablo-jdk installed. > When I sym-link (what I think are) the java plugins for moz. into the > linux-firefox/plu

linux-firefox + proper Java support

2006-07-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
hello everyone, I'm running linux-firefox on FBSD 6.1-i386. I also have diablo-jdk installed. When I sym-link (what I think are) the java plugins for moz. into the linux-firefox/plugins folder, i get some errors dure to ABI : LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /usr/local/d

Re: linux-firefox : cups printers not found

2006-07-23 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:17:15 +0400 "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it's a good way. I've used gtklp for this. Still investigation > is pending for this matter. You can file a PR if you like or poke > me in some time as I tend to forget such things. I'm using gtklp too now, a

Re: linux-firefox : cups printers not found

2006-07-23 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
> > > hi all, > > > I recently changed www/firefox for www/linux-firefox . I now realised > > > that my CUPS printers are not available from File - Print., only > > > 'Postcript/default' is available. > > I have the same problem here :-) > >

Re: linux-firefox : cups printers not found

2006-07-23 Thread Beni
On Saturday 22 July 2006 01:08, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:32:05 +0400 > > "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/20/06, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi all, > > > I recently cha

Re: linux-firefox : cups printers not found

2006-07-21 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:32:05 +0400 "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/20/06, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi all, > > I recently changed www/firefox for www/linux-firefox . I now realised that > > my CUPS printers

Re: linux-firefox : cups printers not found

2006-07-21 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 7/20/06, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi all, I recently changed www/firefox for www/linux-firefox . I now realised that my CUPS printers are not available from File - Print., only 'Postcript/default' is available. You should set "Print command"

Re: linux-firefox : cups printers not found

2006-07-19 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:46:06 +1000 Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > I recently changed www/firefox for www/linux-firefox . I now realised that my > CUPS printers are not available from File - Print., only 'Postcript/default' > is available. &g

linux-firefox : cups printers not found

2006-07-19 Thread Norberto Meijome
hi all, I recently changed www/firefox for www/linux-firefox . I now realised that my CUPS printers are not available from File - Print., only 'Postcript/default' is available. Cupsd is available and managed fine on localhost:631. I can print via lpr -Pprintername, openoffice does sho

Re: linux-firefox and multimedia

2006-05-02 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 5/2/06, dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have mplayerplug-in show most of my multimedia in the *native* firefox. However, linux-firefox runs very smooth too and runs flash7. I know how I can isntall java on this non-native version, BUT, how do I go about when I wa

linux-firefox and multimedia

2006-05-02 Thread dick hoogendijk
I have mplayerplug-in show most of my multimedia in the *native* firefox. However, linux-firefox runs very smooth too and runs flash7. I know how I can isntall java on this non-native version, BUT, how do I go about when I want the multimedia functions back that I had in the freebsd version of

Re: linux-firefox

2006-04-02 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 4/2/06, Warren Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > > I deinstalled both versions of firefox and deleted any reference to mozilla > > or > > firefox. I carefully went through /var/run and /root. I rebooted and > >

Re: linux-firefox

2006-04-02 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Beech Rintoul wrote: I deinstalled both versions of firefox and deleted any reference to mozilla or firefox. I carefully went through /var/run and /root. I rebooted and reinstalled linux-firefox. Still get the error. This is getting old. Maybe something left hanging around

Re: linux-firefox

2006-04-01 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Saturday 01 April 2006 15:15, Lars Cleary wrote: > Beech Rintoul wrote: > > On Monday 27 March 2006 04:22, hackmiester / Hunter Fuller wrote: > >> On Monday 27 March 2006 04:01, Beech Rintoul wrote: > >>> I'm trying to get linux-firefox running on a system

Re: linux-firefox

2006-04-01 Thread Lars Cleary
Beech Rintoul wrote: On Monday 27 March 2006 04:22, hackmiester / Hunter Fuller wrote: On Monday 27 March 2006 04:01, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm trying to get linux-firefox running on a system that also has native firefox installed. When I try and start linux-firefox I get a message saying

Re: linux-firefox

2006-04-01 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 27 March 2006 04:22, hackmiester / Hunter Fuller wrote: > On Monday 27 March 2006 04:01, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > I'm trying to get linux-firefox running on a system that also has native > > firefox installed. When I try and start linux-firefox I get a message > &

Re: linux-firefox

2006-04-01 Thread hackmiester / Hunter Fuller
On Monday 27 March 2006 04:01, Beech Rintoul wrote: > I'm trying to get linux-firefox running on a system that also has native > firefox installed. When I try and start linux-firefox I get a message > saying that firefox is already running (which it's not). You sure? ps ax|g

linux-firefox

2006-04-01 Thread Beech Rintoul
I'm trying to get linux-firefox running on a box that also has native firefox installed. When I try to start it I get the "Already Running" error. I have tried renaming the .mozilla file and checked for a PID or lockfile in /var/run, found nothing. There is no firefox or mozilla

Re: linux-firefox

2006-03-27 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:01:33 -0900 Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to get linux-firefox running on a system that also has > native firefox installed. When I try and start linux-firefox I get a > message saying that firefox is already running (which

linux-firefox

2006-03-27 Thread Beech Rintoul
I'm trying to get linux-firefox running on a system that also has native firefox installed. When I try and start linux-firefox I get a message saying that firefox is already running (which it's not). I tried rebooting but the message remains. Does anyone have a suggesti

  1   2   >