I'm on Holidays

2004-09-18 Thread Matthew Geier

 I am away until the 27th of September 2004.

 IT support queries should be directed to the ITS help desk on
[935]1 6000 in the first instance.

 Any 'network' issues (server failure, etc) should be directed to
Anne de Broglio on [935]1 3861, who will call in assistance as
appropiate, but remember, all queries should in the first instance
go to the ITS help desk above, who will ensure the appropiate
person gets informed of any problems.

 Thanks.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Sound problem, help.

2004-09-18 Thread Jan C. Meyer
 [...] what i wonder for is, its mention in handbook that
 it suppoze to be device sound...but sound it gives an error.

If I've understood correctly, the sound drivers have been 
renamed after 5.2.1R. Does your copy of the handbook 
correspond to 5.1R?

 and the error msg in KDE says:
 aRts control tool, (sorry- aRts had to restart)
  when i try to run the command artsd from shell, it just hang.!

It's supposed to - I was hoping you'd get some informative 
error message, but oh well...
What is the output of this, then:
artswrapper  ; artsshell status ; artsshell terminate

   I really would appreciate it if you could help :(

Can't make any promises - I'm just guessing from a hunch, 
because I used to have a superficially similar problem.

Regards,
 -Jan Christian Meyer

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Courier IMAP, MySQL, Postfix and Maildrop

2004-09-18 Thread Remko Lodder
Thomas,
 Has anybody setup the combination of  Courier IMAP, MySQL, Postfix and
 Courier Maildrop and managed to get it to work?

 I am so close I could just scream, but I can not get any of the
 Courier components to work!

perhaps you should check this site:
http://www.marlow.dk/site.php/tech/postfix
which tells you a little about the maildrop thingy.
Good luck!
Cheers
Remko
--
Kind regards,
Remko Lodder   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reporter DSINet|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Projectleader Mostly-Harmless  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Peter Risdon
Vonleigh Simmons wrote:
I keep struggling with this without finding a way of fixing it. 
Whenever I link in mod_php into httpd.conf (loadmodule and addmodule), 
apache fails to start up. I can get it to work by commenting mod_php it 
out, starting up apache, then commenting it back in and restarting. If I 
restart once more, then it segfaults again. In the logs I occasionally get:

[notice] child pid 17255 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
I've tried installing (and reinstalling) apache13-modssl, 
apache13-modperl, reinstalling /usr/ports/www/mod_php4, compiling apache 
without expat, checking ldd:

/usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp4.so:
libcrypt.so.2 = /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x28248000)
libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x28261000)
/usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp4.so:
libcrypt.so.2 = /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x28248000)
libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x28261000)
So far nothing has been successful. I even tried installing apache2 
to see if that would work, and although it does for the most part, it 
crashes when using the php mail() function.

This happens from time to time and I've no idea why, but hitting it with 
a lump hammer, as follows, seems to fix it for me.

1. deinstall php or mod_php, depending on how you installed it initially
2. manually delete /usr/local/include/php
3. manually delete /usr/local/share/pear if it's there
4. manually delete /usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp4.so if it's still there
5. reinstall php
HTH
Peter.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Vonleigh Simmons
Vonleigh wrote:
I keep struggling with this without finding a way of fixing it. 
Whenever I link in mod_php into httpd.conf (loadmodule and 
addmodule), apache fails to start up. I can get it to work by 
commenting mod_php it out, starting up apache, then commenting it 
back in and restarting. If I restart once more, then it segfaults 
again. In the logs I occasionally get:
[notice] child pid 17255 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
I've tried installing (and reinstalling) apache13-modssl, 
apache13-modperl, reinstalling /usr/ports/www/mod_php4, compiling 
apache without expat, checking ldd:
/usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp4.so:
libcrypt.so.2 = /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x28248000)
libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x28261000)
/usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp4.so:
libcrypt.so.2 = /lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x28248000)
libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2 (0x28261000)
So far nothing has been successful. I even tried installing 
apache2 to see if that would work, and although it does for the most 
part, it crashes when using the php mail() function.
Peter Risdon replied:
This happens from time to time and I've no idea why, but hitting it 
with a lump hammer, as follows, seems to fix it for me.

1. deinstall php or mod_php, depending on how you installed it 
initially
2. manually delete /usr/local/include/php
3. manually delete /usr/local/share/pear if it's there
4. manually delete /usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp4.so if it's still 
there
5. reinstall php

	Thank you for your suggestion Peter. I just followed your instructions 
but it didn't work. Still when I link in php apache dies on startup. 
Anyone have any other suggestions?

Vonleigh Simmons
http://illusionart.com/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Regarding Boot failure

2004-09-18 Thread ramuK hsiraH
  Hai every body

  Recently i have installed FreeBSD5.3
  the installation process is quiet nice
  when the system reboots


  it prompts with the message as follows


  FreeBSD ..
  Default : 0(1,a)/kernel
  boot:




 it stops there what to do next
 plz help me continue from there

 Bye
   Harish Kumar 
   fios.sourceforge.net


Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online
Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded, error

2004-09-18 Thread Nagilum
Hi Puna,
This looks like there occured a looping recursion, there is definately 
something wrong with your ports. Maybe try to reinstall the dependencies 
forcefully after bringing your ports tree up-to-date (if that alone does 
not already help)
Kind regards,
Alex.

Puna Tannehill wrote:
On a freshly rebuild v5.3-BETA4...
A failed compile of sysutils/fastest_cvsup led me to run 'make clean' 
before trying again.  It took over 5 minutes to run make clean, and at 
the very end I got the following:

# make clean
kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7)
Pipe call failed: Too many open files in system
Pipe call failed: Too many open files in system
===  Cleaning for libtool-1.5.8
===  Cleaning for perl-5.8.5
===  Cleaning for fastest_cvsup-0.2.8
There is nothing specifically in tuning about this particular knob, 
but from poking around I get the feeling that it's about memory 
management of the kernel IPC subsystem.

Running 'sysctl kern.ipc.maxpipekva' shows:
kern.ipc.maxpipekva=1257472
Hunting around on in the archives, I came up with people getting this 
error while doing very intensive compiles.  Seems strange to me that I 
might get such an error on a 15min uptime, cold-booted machine and 
just doing a 'make clean'.  And thoughts?

Puna
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: can't get support for postgresql or mysql

2004-09-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:47:48PM -0400, asolomon15 wrote:
 Hello everyone...   I have a problem getting support for mysql within 
 php.   I am running freebsd 5.2.1 and php 4.3.8.  When I tried to run a 
 php script that uses a mysql db connection, I got  this error
  *Fatal error*: Call to undefined function: mysql_connect() in
 
 I did a phpinfo() and noticed i didn't see any mysql or postgresql 
 support in it.   I then tried to install php4-mysql module from the 
 freebsd ports and still no luck.I also tried reinstalling both and I 
 still end up in the same situation.   I did a google search for how to 
 load a mysql module but I keep getting articles about how to load it 
 with apache.   What should I do?  

Installing the php4-mysql module is the correct first step.  The
question is why that new module isn't being loaded as part of
mod_php4?  Eliminating the obvious: did you kill and restart apache
/after/ installing php4-mysql?

If that doesn't work, then what is the value of the 'extension_dir'
property in /usr/local/etc/php.ini ? By default it should be commented
out:

; Directory in which the loadable extensions (modules) reside.
; extension_dir = ./

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgpqy8Xpesg1x.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: php4 + mhash

2004-09-18 Thread Nagilum
Try this:
 cd /usr/ports/security/php4-mhash  make install
and don't forget to make sure you have something like
 extension_dir = /usr/local/lib/php/20020429/
in your /usr/local/etc/php.ini (must point to the directory where your 
mhash.so is located)
Regards,
Alex.

fbsd_user wrote:
how do I tell the php4 port to include mhash?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: can't get support for postgresql or mysql

2004-09-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:32:27PM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
 asolomon15 wrote:
 
 Hello everyone...   I have a problem getting support for mysql within 
 php.   I am running freebsd 5.2.1 and php 4.3.8.  When I tried to run 
 a php script that uses a mysql db connection, I got  this error
  *Fatal error*: Call to undefined function: mysql_connect() in
 
 I did a phpinfo() and noticed i didn't see any mysql or postgresql 
 support in it.   I then tried to install php4-mysql module from the 
 freebsd ports and still no luck.I also tried reinstalling both and 
 I still end up in the same situation.   I did a google search for how 
 to load a mysql module but I keep getting articles about how to load 
 it with apache.   What should I do? 
 
 
 Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING if it is available on your system.  If not,
 you may access it via the cvsweb at the Project web site.  You will need to
 install /usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions to, um, get the extensions ;-)

php4-extensions isn't *required* to install extension modules.  It's
just a handy way for people to manually select what they want out of
all of the available extensions.  Each extension nowadays is a
stand-alone port, like any other port.  PHP applications that require
a certain extension in order to work simply have to register a
run-time dependency on each of the extension modules they need.  Mosr
of the PHP applications in the ports tree have already been modified
to do that.

Cheers,

Matthew 

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp4vXdIgCHM6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: how to make an executable run as another user

2004-09-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:53:31PM -0400, mailing lists at MacTutor wrote:

 QUOTE: In most UNIX kernels there exists what is called a 'race  
 condition' when executing scripts. Scripts are pieces of code which are  
 interpreted by, strangely enough, interpreters. Common examples of  
 interpreters are perl, sed, and awk. So when you have in your perl code  
 #!/usr/local/bin/perl it tells the operating system to start executing  
 the perl interpreter with the current script as input. Between the time  
 that the perl interpreter starts executing and the time that it reads  
 in your script the 'race condition' exists. At this time, a mischievous  
 person could 'win the race' and be able to replace your script with  
 another. And if your script is running as setuid, that person's script  
 would run as your user! So their script could do anything that you  
 could do from the command line. As a result, most UNIX kernels will  
 disable users from running scripts as setuid. The most common way  
 around this is to create a wrapper program around your script. A  
 wrapper, in this context, is a small program, possibly written in C,  
 that when executed will simply run your script. The 'race condition'  
 does not exist for real executables and so you won't be thwarted by the  
 kernel itself.

Actually, this should no longer be a problem in any up to date version
of Unix.  The race condition between the kernel reading the script to
find what interpreter to invoke, and the interpreter then to read and
interpret the script was solved by having the kernel pass an open
filedescriptor on the script file to the interpreter.  One way of
testing if your OS supports this is the presence of 'file descriptor'
devices under /dev -- eg. under FreeBSD you get:

happy-idiot-talk:/usr/local/etc:% ls -la /dev/fd/*
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   0 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/0
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   1 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/1
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   2 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/2
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   3 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/3
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   4 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/4
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   5 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/5
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   6 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/6
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   7 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/7
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   8 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/8
crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   9 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/9
[...]

However, the horror has been so beaten into the collective unconscious
inherited from earlier days of Unix that shell scripts are still
automatically stripped of any setuid or setgid bits by default on most
Unix variants.  I did see a setuid 'lp' script as a standard part of
the lp system on a Solaris 8 box once -- took me a long time to
convince myself it was actually safe.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgpanoEr7xQai.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Question

2004-09-18 Thread 15218162
Hello !

Can i get one subdomain for domain freebsd.org ?
I need subdomain for my personal freebsd page...
If i can get it, then please add subdomain: security.freebsd.org - 193.77.58.94 

Thanks

Urh Lednik 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Urh Lednik
Partizanska Cesta 15
2392, Mezica
Slovenia


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Regarding Boot failure

2004-09-18 Thread Nagilum
Hi,
Could it be that you forgot to remove the mfsroot floppy from the 
diskdrive when you rebooted?

Regards,
Alex.
ramuK hsiraH wrote:
 Hai every body
 Recently i have installed FreeBSD5.3
 the installation process is quiet nice
 when the system reboots
 it prompts with the message as follows
 FreeBSD ..
 Default : 0(1,a)/kernel
 boot:

it stops there what to do next
plz help me continue from there
Bye
  Harish Kumar 
  fios.sourceforge.net


Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online
Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Question

2004-09-18 Thread Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello !
Can i get one subdomain for domain freebsd.org ?
I need subdomain for my personal freebsd page...
If i can get it, then please add subdomain: security.freebsd.org - 193.77.58.94 

Thanks
Urh Lednik 

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Urh Lednik
Partizanska Cesta 15
2392, Mezica
Slovenia
*Chuckle*
I needed that after working all night long...
--
Best regards,
Chris
Everything is contagious.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


5.3-BETA4, erros buildworld

2004-09-18 Thread Damian S. Koodziejczyk
Hello.
cvsup done ~ 1h ago.
make buildworld [cputype = p3]:
/usr/src/usr.sbin/fdcontrol/fdcontrol.c: In function `main':
/usr/src/usr.sbin/fdcontrol/fdcontrol.c:212: error: `FD_DEBUG' undeclared (first
 use in this function)
/usr/src/usr.sbin/fdcontrol/fdcontrol.c:212: error: (Each undeclared identifier is 
reported only once
/usr/src/usr.sbin/fdcontrol/fdcontrol.c:212: error: for each function it appears in.)
*** Error code 1

-- 
Damian S. Koodziejczyk
Nie jeste pijany, jeli moesz lee na pododze, nie trzymajc si jej.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD firewall for lazy people

2004-09-18 Thread Björn Lindström
I'm finding that configuring firewall/NAT rules on the gateway to my PPP
connection is too much of a headache.

Are there any FreeBSD based firewall distributions, something like
http://thewall.sourceforge.net/, but with some sort of wrapper (web
interface, curses interface, or whatever) for configuring pppoe, ipfw,
NAT etc.?

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Peter Risdon
Vonleigh Simmons wrote:
Vonleigh wrote:
Thank you for your suggestion Peter. I just followed your 
instructions but it didn't work. Still when I link in php apache dies on 
startup. Anyone have any other suggestions?

Odd. I didn't specify this, probably taking it too much for granted, but 
did you do a make clean before installing again?

Peter.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Laser Printer for FreeBSD

2004-09-18 Thread Robert Huff

Matt Emmerton writes: 

   If you look around, you can find old LaserJets that are being
   dumped when they're still perfectly fine (and usually come with
   a full toner cartridge too).

Speaking of toner - check out the price and capacity of
replacement cartridges.  If the cost for a year's usage were to
differ by $100 in cartridges, it would probably be worth spending
that first $100 on the machine itself 
Love my 6MP; don't love the cost of replacement cartridges.


Robert Huff



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


X.org performance?

2004-09-18 Thread Benjamin Walkenhorst
Hello everyone,

I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE on a dual AthlonMP 2400+ with 512MB
RAM, 60GB of IDE HDD (UDMA100) and a GeForce 4200Ti.

I recently switched over X.org. After some minor hassles I actually got
it to work. =) However, I *kind of feel* like performance has become
worse. 
Especially using AcroRead burns cycles without end. But, say, switching
desktops (I'm using WindowMaker) with maximized windows on them also
hits the CPU considerably. ;-?
Does anyone experience similar 'problems'? (I mean, it's not like my
system wasn't working or something) Is there any hope this might get
better with coming versions?

I am using the 'nv' driver, not nVidia's. I tried the nVidia
driver under Linux, once, and it made my system rather unstable. ;-/

Thanks for any hints,
kind regards,
Benjamin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Can we run Windows software packages in BSD

2004-09-18 Thread ?fffc6?fffdc ?fffd5?fffc5
Hello,
   I am using a lot of software packages in my study. I can't find the Unix editions 
for these software. Is there any way that I can run them in BSD?
   Thanks!



-
Do You Yahoo!?
150MP3

1G1000
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: X.org performance?

2004-09-18 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Saturday 18 September 2004 09:57, Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote:
 Hello everyone,

 I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE on a dual AthlonMP 2400+ with
 512MB RAM, 60GB of IDE HDD (UDMA100) and a GeForce 4200Ti.

5.2.1-RELEASE-p9
Dual Athlon 2400 MP
768 Meg DDR
80 gig Western Digital 7200 RPM 
Geforce 4 4200 TI nv driver
Fluxbox on Xorg 6.7.0

Runs like a champ.

Josh Paetzel


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Can we run Windows software packages in BSD

2004-09-18 Thread arden
you could try running them inside a windows emulator like wine,or duel
boot your system if you have paid for your windows I cant see any reason
not to use it if its needed (sure someone here will tell me otherwise ) 

Arden 

On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 21:42,
=?gb2312?q?=FFc6=FFdc=20=FFd5=FFc5?= wrote:
 Hello,
I am using a lot of software packages in my study. I can't find the Unix editions 
 for these software. Is there any way that I can run them in BSD?
Thanks!
 
 
 
 -
 Do You Yahoo!?
 150MP3
 
 1G1000
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: X.org performance?

2004-09-18 Thread Benjamin Walkenhorst
Hello,

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:01:25 -0500
Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Runs like a champ.

Good for you. =)
I'm not really saying it doesn't run sufficiently - or if I was, I
didn't mean to -, it's just that X.org is consuming large amounts of
cpu-time. 
I mean, it's not like my system is getting slow, exactly, it's just 
Xorg uses a lot of CPU, sometimes. 
I mean, XFree did that, too, but I am under the impression that Xorg is
a little worse, in that respect.

Or is it just my perception tricking me, while Xorg is not that
different from XFree, technically?

 Josh Paetzel

Kind regards,
Benjamin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: apache chroot or FreeBSD jail ?

2004-09-18 Thread Subhro
Jail is definitely a better option but again Jail is still not 100%
documented...neither it is tested well. So you would be inviting some
incompatibilities and possibly troubles if you go for jails. chroot
environments are pretty safe and can be relied upon

Regards
S.


On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 08:39:48 +0300, Omer Faruk Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am planning to restrict apache to a spesific directory. But I am not sure
 if to install apache in chroot env or making a FreeBSD jail install ( say
 /usr/jail/freebsd_jail_ip). Which one is recommended for better security ?
 
 An artilcele in http://www.haught.org/freebsdapache.php says jail is better
 that just chroot environment. But I want to be sure to have your opinions
 about it and want be sure which one is better.
 
 Regards,
 
 ---
 Omer Faruk Sen
 http://www.EnderUNIX.ORG
 Software Development Team @ Turkey
 http://www.Faruk.NET
 For Public key: http://www.enderunix.org/ofsen/ofsen.asc
 
 
 First Turkish FreeBSD book is out! Go check it.
 Duydunuz mu! Turkiye'nin ilk FreeBSD kitabi cikti.
 http://www.acikkod.com/freebsd.php
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



-- 
Subhro Sankha Kar
School of Information Technology
Block AQ-13/1 Sector V
ZIP 700091
India
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FBSD 5.2.1, Apache 2, PHP

2004-09-18 Thread steveb99
 
I keep looking for a how-to or other information on setting up FreeBSD
5.2.1, Apache 2, PHP, and MySQL, but not finding much.  I do find
things using Apache 1.3, but not 2.  I want to have a setup similar to
what I develop on at work, but work is using Linux.  

Is this a workable configuration on FreeBSD?  If so can someone point
me to some FAQ, how-to, notes, comments, etc.

Thanks
Steve Barnette

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Can we run Windows software packages in BSD

2004-09-18 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 21:42,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Hello,
  I am using a lot of software packages in my study. I can't find the 
Unix editions for these software. Is there any way that I can run them in BSD?
  Thanks!
   

Wine, vmware are windows emulators in the ports collection.  Your software
might run under them.  There are also a couple of DOS emulators there.
Just out of curiosity, what software packages are you referring to, exactly?
Kevin Kinsey
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FBSD 5.2.1, Apache 2, PHP

2004-09-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 09:43:33AM -0700, steveb99 wrote:
  
 I keep looking for a how-to or other information on setting up FreeBSD
 5.2.1, Apache 2, PHP, and MySQL, but not finding much.  I do find
 things using Apache 1.3, but not 2.  I want to have a setup similar to
 what I develop on at work, but work is using Linux.  
 
 Is this a workable configuration on FreeBSD?  If so can someone point
 me to some FAQ, how-to, notes, comments, etc.

Works for me, except I'm running 4.10 rather than 5.2.1.  Installing
all that stuff via ports is the way to go -- it's pretty easy really,
which might explain the relative paucity of anyone writing up how-tos.

Here's a handy tip.  You can control what versions of apache, PHP and
MySQL are installed by setting some make(1) variables.  First, make
sure that your ports tree is up to date using cvsup(1).

To set the variables for make(1) to use, there are quite a few
options, but the simplest and most effective is to add the settings to
/etc/make.conf.  You'll want to add:

WITH_APACHE2=   yes
WITH_MYSQL_VER= 40   # Choose from 323, 40, 41 or 50
DEFAULT_PHP_VER=4# Choose from 4 or 5 
WANT_PHP_MOD=   yes  # Want mod_php{4,5}  (*)

Other stuff you might want to set:

WANT_PHP_CLI=   yes  # Install command line version of PHP (*)
WANT_PHP_PEAR=  yes  # If you want the PEAR framework (*)

The three settings marked (*) are really only meant to be used by port
maintainers. However there as there aren't any handy user oriented
ways of choosing those settings, you've got to bend the rules a bit.
Also not that quite a lot of PHP software available from the 'net does
not yet work with PHP5.

You can combine WANT_PHP_CLI and WANT_PHP_MOD -- see
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.php.mk for a number of other variables you can set
to achive other PHP configurations.  Beware though -- some of those
settings are mutually incompatible.

Now, you should be able to install apache2 etc. by utilising the
dependencies built into the ports system:

# cd /usr/ports/databases/php4-mysql   (or php5-mysql)
# make install

That will install the MySQL client-side software as one of the
dependencies, along with apache2 and mod_php4.  If you want to install
the MySQL server as well, then do:

# cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql40-server
# make install

All of the php extensions are not installed as separate ports -- use
the lang/php{4,5}-extensions port to select and install exactly what
extensions you want. (Hint: almost everything wants the pcre
extension) See ports(7) for the explanation of the 'make configure',
'make showconfig' and 'make rmconfig' commands.

Now, you will need to add the correct variables to /etc/rc.conf to get
those servers started up at system boot (see the scripts installed
into /usr/local/etc/rc.d for instructions), and you'll have to edit
the configuration files for apache and MySQL along with installing web
and database content.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp1Z8nRj7XZn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: pf not logging on 5.3-BETA3 ? [more info]

2004-09-18 Thread Hugo Silva

 On Friday 17 September 2004 20:51, Hugo Silva wrote:
  Did you put in device pflog as well? What does $ifconfig pflog0
 say?

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/klr]# ifconfig pflog0
 pflog0: flags=41UP,RUNNING mtu 33208

 Okay, for some reason pflogd is *not* running! Otherwise you'd have pflog0
 in
 PROMIC mode:
  pflog0: flags=141UP,RUNNING,PROMISC mtu 33208
 so we have to find out why it is not. Try starting it by hand and watch
 your
 daemon log closely. I can't reproduce the problem in any system (be it
 BETA3
 from disc, RELENG_5 or CURRENT) so I am afraid that something is wrong
 with
 your setup. Nontheless this *should* not happen ...

 If the problem is persistent, please file a PR reconstructing possible
 much
 information about how you got the system into the stage it is now (i.e.
 how
 did you install/update?). Thanks


Hey,

pflogd seems to start with the system (pf_logd set), but it exits. Same as
if I do it manually:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# pflogd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# ps aux | grep pflogd
root 14806  0.0  0.3   348  208  p0  R+8:30PM   0:00.00 grep pflogd

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# which pflogd
/sbin/pflogd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# file /sbin/pflogd
/sbin/pflogd: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD),
for FreeBSD 5.3, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped

-

/var/log/messages shows this whenever i try to run pflogd:

Sep 18 20:31:47 evilreborn kernel: pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
Sep 18 20:31:47 evilreborn kernel: pflog0: promiscuous mode disabled

Another oddity, I had to add ifconfig pflog0 up to a startup script to
make my pflog (read logs on pflog0 normally..) work, else it would
complain:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc/rc.d]# pflog
tcpdump: BIOCSETIF: pflog0: Network is down

I don't remember having to ifconfig pflog0 up on 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 (another
server) with pf from ports.


I updated from 5.2.1-RELEASE (installed by cdrom) to RELENG_5 (BETA3 at
the time) by cvsup.

 If more info is needed, let me know. I don't think this is an obvious
 mistake of me (altough it could be, I haven't looked to this problem in
 the last days, must take some time to look more carefully at it).

 As a reminder, the system is:
 FreeBSD evilreborn 5.3-BETA3 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 #0: Wed Sep 15 19:18:51
 WEST 2004
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/evilreborn53-kernel
  i386

  --
  /\  Best regards,  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \ /  Max Laier  | ICQ #67774661
   X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  / \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | Against HTML Mail and News

 Best Regards,

 Hugo

 --
 /\  Best regards,  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 \ /  Max Laier  | ICQ #67774661
  X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 / \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | Against HTML Mail and News



-- 
www.6s-gaming.com

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: how to make an executable run as another user

2004-09-18 Thread Richard Bradley
I understand now. Thanks very much for all your help. 

Rich


On Saturday 18 September 2004 11:31 am, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:53:31PM -0400, mailing lists at MacTutor wrote:
  QUOTE: In most UNIX kernels there exists what is called a 'race
  condition' when executing scripts. Scripts are pieces of code which are
  interpreted by, strangely enough, interpreters. Common examples of
  interpreters are perl, sed, and awk. So when you have in your perl code
  #!/usr/local/bin/perl it tells the operating system to start executing
  the perl interpreter with the current script as input. Between the time
  that the perl interpreter starts executing and the time that it reads
  in your script the 'race condition' exists. At this time, a mischievous
  person could 'win the race' and be able to replace your script with
  another. And if your script is running as setuid, that person's script
  would run as your user! So their script could do anything that you
  could do from the command line. As a result, most UNIX kernels will
  disable users from running scripts as setuid. The most common way
  around this is to create a wrapper program around your script. A
  wrapper, in this context, is a small program, possibly written in C,
  that when executed will simply run your script. The 'race condition'
  does not exist for real executables and so you won't be thwarted by the
  kernel itself.

 Actually, this should no longer be a problem in any up to date version
 of Unix.  The race condition between the kernel reading the script to
 find what interpreter to invoke, and the interpreter then to read and
 interpret the script was solved by having the kernel pass an open
 filedescriptor on the script file to the interpreter.  One way of
 testing if your OS supports this is the presence of 'file descriptor'
 devices under /dev -- eg. under FreeBSD you get:

 happy-idiot-talk:/usr/local/etc:% ls -la /dev/fd/*
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   0 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/0
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   1 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/1
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   2 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/2
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   3 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/3
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   4 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/4
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   5 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/5
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   6 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/6
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   7 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/7
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   8 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/8
 crw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel   22,   9 Jul  5 17:08 /dev/fd/9
 [...]

 However, the horror has been so beaten into the collective unconscious
 inherited from earlier days of Unix that shell scripts are still
 automatically stripped of any setuid or setgid bits by default on most
 Unix variants.  I did see a setuid 'lp' script as a standard part of
 the lp system on a Solaris 8 box once -- took me a long time to
 convince myself it was actually safe.

   Cheers,

   Matthew

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Paul Schmehl
- Original Message - 
From: Vonleigh Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:36 PM
Subject: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

 Any suggestions at all are welcomed. I'm willing to try anything at
 this point. It was all working beautifully until I did a portupgrade of
 apache and mod_php. I really wish I would've just left it alone.

Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?  The php port has changed.  Now, you do a
base install, and then you install the extensions separately.  And you have
to make sure to comment out the extensions_dir variable in your php.ini
file.

I'd bet that's what your problem is.

Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Automating FreeBSD Installation(s)...

2004-09-18 Thread Forrest Aldrich
I've read several articles out there that address different means to 
automate (or standardize, for internal purposes) FreeBSD 
installations.   One article (which was older) spoke of scripting 
sysinstall via an install.cfg with some custom pkg modules to do 
edits.   The other, exploiting the PXE capability of the newer (Intel) NICs.

I'm interested in what people are doing now - what has had the better 
success rate, etc.I realize this is all dependent upon one's 
environment - mine will be more ISP-related, but will require some 
flexibility for different servers.

I've also heard of people utilizing GNU CFEngine for this type of 
procedure, which I find interesting - it's a complex package, but seems 
to be very functional if you have time/patience to apply it.

Thanks...

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Evolution ICS Calendar Import Problem

2004-09-18 Thread Robert McIntosh
Hi,

I'm using FreeBSD 4.10 and am trying to use Evolution 1.4.6 to import my
ICS calendar file.  Using Evolution's Import utility, I'd like to import
my ics file I originally created with Mozilla Calendar or Sunbird (can't
remember which - I suspect they have exactly the same file
format...ics).  Evolution thinks it's imported the data, goes through
all the import wizard dialogues, however my calendar in Evolution
remains empty.  No alerts of errors of any kind.  Any suggetions on
what's wrong and a work around beyond me typing in stuff by hand?

I'm also appreciative of any calendar application suggestions.  I'm
dreaming of running Sunbird or Mozilla Calendar on FreeBSD 4.10.

Thanks!
Robert

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


4.10, Jails, apache and FIN_WAIT_1

2004-09-18 Thread Rob
Hi..
Due to unreliable hardware, I transferred my (very lightly loaded) 
webserver from it's own machine, running FreeBSD 5.2, to a jail on 
alternate machine running 4.10-STABLE (Cvsup'd as of 14/9/04).

The new system is a Pentium III, 1GHz, 384Mb RAM, dual 40Gb drives (on a 
SiL 0680 ATA133 Raid controller, as RAID 1) it's running mysqld as well, 
but should be able to cope.

I installed latest versions of all the software, (ran portupgrade) but just 
copied over the apache config folder from /usr/local/etc on the other 
machine.  It's not complained.  The data area was nfs mounted from the 
machine I just moved apache to, so I've just nfs-mounted this at the 
appropriate mount point inside the jail.

The problem is, I'm getting a lot of stalled connections when accessing the 
webserver.  running netstat on the host shows e.g.:

tcp4   0  0  jade.http 212.57.246.42.35590FIN_WAIT_1
tcp4   0  0  jade.http 212.57.246.42.35585ESTABLISHED
tcp4   0  0  jade.http 212.57.246.42.3CLOSING
This one is me - while this FIN_WAIT_1 is present, I cannot persuade my 
browser (Opera 7.52 on Windows 2K) to work - it sits with Sending request 
to www... in the status line.  Pressing refresh does nothing...  as soon 
as the FIN_WAIT_1 vanishes, then everything is OK again, for a few more 
minutes.

I'm running apache-1.3.31_4 in the jail, which was set up simply as per the 
jail man page, then ssh enabled.

No software firewall (this server is behind a NATing ADSL router, the 
configuration of which has not changed bar the http port-forwarding IP 
address, and I am behind a hardware firewall, ditto no changes.  I do block 
ICMP on my firewall, but it's never caused this sort of problem before.

Googling for FIN_WAIT_1 throws up some hits about a DoS vulnerability, but 
nothing I can see that relates to the problem I am having.  This is hardly 
a complicated configuration, so is there something I am missing, some 
kernel configuration issue maybe, that I should know about?

Any pointers towards where I should look next would be much appreciated,
Thanks in advance,
Rob O'Donnell.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


core dump with portupgrade

2004-09-18 Thread Anthony Philipp
Hello, when I was trying to upgrade my laptop with the latest ports this is what 
happened. 



(16:50:29) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/philipp1 1# portupgrade -arR
Stale dependency: ORBit-0.5.17_1 -- gettext-0.12.1 -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' t
o fix, or specify -O to force.
(16:51:17) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/philipp1 2# pkgdb -F
---  Checking the package registry database
Duplicated origin: textproc/expat2 - expat-1.95.6_1 expat-1.95.7
Unregister any of them? [no] 
Duplicated origin: databases/ruby-bdb1 - ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2
Unregister any of them? [no] yes
  Unregister ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 keeping the installed files intact? [no] yes
  - ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 is kept.
  -- Saving the ruby-bdb1-0.2.1's +CONTENTS file as 
/var/db/pkg/ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2/+CONTENTS.ruby-bdb1-0.2.1
  -- Unregistering ruby-bdb1-0.2.1
  -- Done.
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 284 packages found (-1 
+0) (...) done]
Stale dependency: ORBit-0.5.17_1 - gettext-0.12.1 (devel/gettext):
[Failed `Inappropriate file type or format'] [Updating the portsdb format:bdb1_btree 
in /usr/ports ... - 11733 port entries found 
.1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.../usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587:
 [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd5]

Abort trap (core dumped)



Also the same thing happened when I did portsdb -Uu or portversion -l 
I can post those if required, and this is highly reproducible, so just ask if you need 
more info.
Anthony

Thanks for any help you can provide.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Paul Schmehl wrote:
- Original Message - 
From: Vonleigh Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:36 PM
Subject: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup
 

Any suggestions at all are welcomed. I'm willing to try anything at
this point. It was all working beautifully until I did a portupgrade of
apache and mod_php. I really wish I would've just left it alone.
   

Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?  The php port has changed.  Now, you do a
base install, and then you install the extensions separately.  And you have
to make sure to comment out the extensions_dir variable in your php.ini
file.
I'd bet that's what your problem is.
 

Well, you might have to pony up the cash.  As of last night,
I've got both this issue and the portupgrade/ruby segfault
messing with my mind.  Matt Seaman had posted something
about incompatible openssl libs; I'm currently trying a complete
buildworld/installworld cycle.  However, if commenting out the
extensions dir in php.ini would help, I'm game to try; but when
I did it, PHP complained it couldn't load its modules
No flame intended, but something weird seems to be in the
water this weekend...
Kevin Kinsey
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Vonleigh Simmons
Well, you might have to pony up the cash.  As of last night,
I've got both this issue and the portupgrade/ruby segfault
messing with my mind.
	I was using the portindex and portindexdb solution, but for some 
reason when I did the portupgrade they got deinstalled (something about 
upon maintainer's request). So right now I'm not sure what the solution 
is (besides changing the database).

Vonleigh Simmons
http://illusionart.com/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Vonleigh Simmons
Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?  The php port has changed.  Now, you 
do a
base install, and then you install the extensions separately.  And you 
have
to make sure to comment out the extensions_dir variable in your php.ini
file.
	Yes I read it, I ran into that problem much before this one. It was 
all working great until that portupgrade that I did. I do have 
extensions_dir commented out:

;extension_dir = ./
	After doing my trick of restarting apache with it off, I can still 
access the extras (GD image library for example). So I'm pretty sure 
that's not the problem. I've also tried reinstalling with all of the 
extras off (trying different combinations).

Vonleigh Simmons
http://illusionart.com/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache13 + mod_php segfault at startup

2004-09-18 Thread Vonleigh Simmons
Odd. I didn't specify this, probably taking it too much for granted, 
but did you do a make clean before installing again?
	Yep, I always use make install clean to make sure I do. Just tried it 
again to make sure (clean, then make then install) but still no go.

Vonleigh Simmons
http://illusionart.com/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: -DNOPROFILE ?

2004-09-18 Thread jason
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
What exactly does this make.conf-flag do: 

NOPROFILE= true# Avoid compiling profiled libraries
What are profiled libraries?  

GH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Better late than never?  If  you have not found out by now, it means do 
not compile in performance monitoring tools.  When it is on you will 
have extra code.  When the program is run you can run a kind of 
benchmark with it to analyze when what is going on and how long parts of 
the code take to run.  It is a big help if you want to maximize a 
programs speed, but is a waste of space for regular users.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread timh
2 Major Issues:

- FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue

- The core kernel issues with FreeBSD is the horrible threading
support.There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The multithreading issue in
freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years. They have just made work
arounds, not fixing the actual problem. It seems that the only real BSD that
has made big progress on the core issues is DragonflyBSD.

 It appears that FreeBSD have a clear Multi-threading lock-in issue that
needs to be fixed. Not work arounds. According to many freebsd developers
nobody simply wants to fix this, is it true that the current smp work are
just 'work-arounds' not real fixing?

The only thing holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading issue.

Please clarify this.


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD firewall for lazy people

2004-09-18 Thread Brian
 

[--]
I'm finding that configuring firewall/NAT rules on the gateway to my PPP
connection is too much of a headache.

Are there any FreeBSD based firewall distributions, something like
http://thewall.sourceforge.net/, but with some sort of wrapper (web
interface, curses interface, or whatever) for configuring pppoe, ipfw, NAT
etc.?

[--]

http://m0n0.ch/wall/

Cheers.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.754 / Virus Database: 504 - Release Date: 06/09/2004
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: X.org performance?

2004-09-18 Thread Björn Lindström
Benjamin Walkenhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Or is it just my perception tricking me, while Xorg is not that
 different from XFree, technically?

Is your configuration identical? Using certain modules can cost some
cycles, for instance, so if you also started using any of those with
your switch, that could explain your impression.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: X.org performance?

2004-09-18 Thread Benjamin Walkenhorst
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 01:43:22 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Björn Lindström) wrote:

 Benjamin Walkenhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Or is it just my perception tricking me, while Xorg is not that
  different from XFree, technically?
 
 Is your configuration identical? Using certain modules can cost some
 cycles, for instance, so if you also started using any of those with
 your switch, that could explain your impression.

Mmmh, I did not touch the configuration file at all.
Haven't looked at it in a while, actually.
I'll look there and try to disable unused/unneccessary modules.

Thanks,
Benjamin

-- 
If cars had improved at [the computer industry's] rate, a Rolls Royce
would now cost 10 dollars and get a billion miles per gallon.
(Unfortunately, it would probably also have 200-page manual telling how
to open the door.)
--
Andrew Tanenbaum, Introduction To Distributed Systems
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread stheg olloydson

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns0.secureanonymous.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tjhawkins.com
Subject: Please explain.


2 Major Issues:

- FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue

- The core kernel issues with FreeBSD is the horrible threading
support.There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The multithreading
issue in
freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years. They have just made work
arounds, not fixing the actual problem. It seems that the only real
BSD that
has made big progress on the core issues is DragonflyBSD.

It appears that FreeBSD have a clear Multi-threading lock-in issue
that
needs to be fixed. Not work arounds. According to many freebsd
developers
nobody simply wants to fix this, is it true that the current smp work
are
just 'work-arounds' not real fixing?

The only thing holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading issue.

Please clarify this.

Hello,

Please clarify your post. You make many claims without any offering any
examples. 
You claim, FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue. What
exactly is the issue? Give an example, please.
You claim, There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The multithreading
issue in freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years. They have just
made work arounds, not fixing the actual problem. To what crap in the
FreeBSD kernel are you referring? Please post an example of the
horrible threading support and how it should be done. How did you
arrive at the time span of 6 years? Who is this They that has just
made 'work-arounds' not real fixing? Who are these many  freebsd
developers to whom you refer? Finally, you claim, The only thing
holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading issue. Holding it back from
what?
Please explain the basis for your assertions so that the community may
better answer them.

Regards,

Stheg

BTW: Considering you're running a Windows-based OS, not a BSD-based
one, why do you even care?



___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Question

2004-09-18 Thread Hotmail
Hi,

  I Bought from you FreeBSD 4.10 v, my main concern after I installed it in my laptop 
I have trouble defining my network wireless card Linksys wireless -B and the 
network, How can I do that?. Also Do I need the device wi0?, and how can I find it?

  Sincerely,

 Ramez.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


winxp freebsd dual boot with freebsd on second HD

2004-09-18 Thread Abe Olson
In the handbook it says that, in cases where you have freebsd on the 
second disk and windows on the first, that you have to install the 
freebsd boot manager on both disks. I discovered this after I had 
installed freebsd. I am currently trying to install the freebsd boot 
manager on my first disk by following the instructions here: 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/boot-blocks.html

The instructions say:
Other operating systems, in particular Windows® 95, have been known to 
overwrite an existing MBR with their own. If this happens to you, or you 
want to replace your existing MBR with the FreeBSD MBR then use the 
following command:

# fdisk -B -b /boot/boot0 device
Where device is the device that you boot from . . .
When I run this command, it asks me if I want to write a new boot block 
and then it asks me if I want to write a new partition table (We finally 
arrive at my question) Won't writing a partition table on my windows 
disk destroy the data on that disk? I tried saying no to writing a 
partition table but I still cannot boot both OS's from the first disk.

Thanks for your time and knowledge folks.
abe
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Sonntag, 19. September 2004 01:08 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 2 Major Issues:

 - FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue

 - The core kernel issues with FreeBSD is the horrible threading
 support.There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The multithreading issue
 in freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years. They have just made work
 arounds, not fixing the actual problem. It seems that the only real BSD
 that has made big progress on the core issues is DragonflyBSD.

  It appears that FreeBSD have a clear Multi-threading lock-in issue that
 needs to be fixed. Not work arounds. According to many freebsd developers
 nobody simply wants to fix this, is it true that the current smp work are
 just 'work-arounds' not real fixing?

 The only thing holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading issue.

 Please clarify this.

Why should one answer to this email? Use what ever you think qualifies your 
needs!



 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread steveb99
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Emanuel Strobl
 Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:41 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Please explain.
 
 Am Sonntag, 19. September 2004 01:08 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  2 Major Issues:
 
 Why should one answer to this email? Use what ever you think 
 qualifies your needs!
 

Just a troll, look at all the cross-posting.

Steve Barnette

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


kernel ident

2004-09-18 Thread John Shelton
the kernel configuration file contains the option 'ident.'
is the value of ident hardcoded into the kernel?
just curious. thanks.
--
~rick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Recompiling `world` throws Segmentation fault

2004-09-18 Thread robg
Hi:

I updated my source code to 4.10 and went to recompile world using
`make buildworld` and it prints this out:


gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard/pccardd/pccard.conf.5  pccard.conf.5.gz
gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard/pccardd/pccardd.8  pccardd.8.gz
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
*** Error code 139

Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
35218#

Could someone tell me how to fix this?

-- 
robg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Recompiling `world` throws Segmentation fault

2004-09-18 Thread Bill Moran
robg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi:
 
 I updated my source code to 4.10 and went to recompile world using
 `make buildworld` and it prints this out:
 
 
 gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard/pccardd/pccard.conf.5  pccard.conf.5.gz
 gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard/pccardd/pccardd.8  pccardd.8.gz
 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
 *** Error code 139
 
 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard.
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin.
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/src.
 *** Error code 1
 
 Stop in /usr/src.
 35218#
 
 Could someone tell me how to fix this?

There is a FAQ entry on this, but the short answer is:
If you try to make world multiple times, and it segfaults at a different
part of the process each time, it's probably faulty hardware.

See the FreeBSD FAQ for more information.  Also, download and run something
along the lines of memtest86 to see if your RAM is reliable.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread stheg olloydson
Plesae, excuse the messiness of the reply to a poster using MS's broken
formatting.

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  processor affinity design issue..  i.e.. processes stay on the cpu
 they are
 spawned on..which is a big problem for mysql which explains why it
 performs
 better on other systems.
 
 Furthermore, the SMP issue is a common problem among many FreeBSD
 developers
 whom have told me the same, there is alot of this information all
 over the
 internet. FreeBSD is unable to perform good on multiple CPUs, the
 fixes are
 just work arounds.
 
 Unless if the freebsd community has just started to fix the
 multithreading
 issue, it's a huge problem. Darwin does not have this problem
 whatsoever.
 
 Why do I care? This is a silly question. I have 2 windows PCs here, I
 have 9
 other workstations that all run unix. I am a server manager and I do
 consulting work for freebsd/linux. Windows came free so why not? I
 don't do
 business on it.
 
 I've been a really huge FreeBSD supporter.. but I am really concerned
 about
 this issue which has been an issue for so long.
 
 thanks,
 tim h.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: stheg olloydson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:05 PM
 Subject: Re: Please explain.
 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns0.secureanonymous.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tjhawkins.com
Subject: Please explain.


2 Major Issues:

- FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue

- The core kernel issues with FreeBSD is the horrible threading
support.There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The
 multithreading
issue in
freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years. They have just made
 work
arounds, not fixing the actual problem. It seems that the only
 real BSD that
has made big progress on the core issues is DragonflyBSD.

It appears that FreeBSD have a clear Multi-threading lock-in issue
 that
needs to be fixed. Not work arounds. According to many freebsd
developers
nobody simply wants to fix this, is it true that the current smp
 work
are
just 'work-arounds' not real fixing?

The only thing holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading issue.

Please clarify this.

 Hello,

 Please clarify your post. You make many claims without any offering
 any examples.
 You claim, FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue. What
 exactly is the issue? Give an example, please.
 You claim, There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The
multithreading issue in freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years.
 They have just made work arounds, not fixing the actual problem. To
 what crap in the FreeBSD kernel are you referring? Please post an
 example of the horrible threading support and how it should be
done. How did you arrive at the time span of 6 years? Who is this
They that has just made 'work-arounds' not real fixing? Who are
these many  freebsd developers to whom you refer? Finally, you
claim, The only  thing holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading
issue. Holding it  back from what?
 Please explain the basis for your assertions so that the community
 may better answer them.

 Regards,

 Stheg

 BTW: Considering you're running a Windows-based OS, not a BSD-based
 one, why do you even care?

Hello,

Because you failed to offer any proof of your assertions other than
repeating them, albeit with the addition of the vague statement that
there is alot [sic] of this information all over the internet [sic]
(which, if were true, begs the questions why are you asking here then),
I cannot put any stock in your claims.
My apologies to the community for rising to the troll.

Yours truly,

Stheg




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread timh
Ask the FreeBSD developers, any of them with honesty should tell you or
proof me false. I dare you to proof this false, I would be so happy if you
did. Just because I'm using MS Mailer does not reflect whom I am. I have
only 1 MS workstation with 9 others unix.

I expected a mature response from most of you, calling names is NOT the way
to resolve problems. I just want an answer to see if this is true.

**Is it true**? This is what I've noticed myself and many high-scale
developers.

Thank you

- Original Message -
From: steveb99 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:09 PM
Subject: RE: Please explain.




  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Emanuel Strobl
  Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:41 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Please explain.
 
  Am Sonntag, 19. September 2004 01:08 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   2 Major Issues:
 
  Why should one answer to this email? Use what ever you think
  qualifies your needs!
 

 Just a troll, look at all the cross-posting.

 Steve Barnette




___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread Chris Laverdure
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 02:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ask the FreeBSD developers, any of them with honesty should tell you or
 proof me false. I dare you to proof this false, I would be so happy if you
 did. Just because I'm using MS Mailer does not reflect whom I am. I have
 only 1 MS workstation with 9 others unix.
 
 I expected a mature response from most of you, calling names is NOT the way
 to resolve problems. I just want an answer to see if this is true.
 
 **Is it true**? This is what I've noticed myself and many high-scale
 developers.
 
 Thank you

1) The burden of proof is on the person making the allegations.

2) Calling a troll on being a troll is mature.

3) If you believe it to be true, then don't use FreeBSD. Nobody is tying
your hands here. You believe DragonFlyBSD to be superior? Then use it.

Maybe I just don't see the big deal here, but the developers owe you
nothing.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Please explain.

2004-09-18 Thread timh
Your taking it the wrong way, I was simply asking a question to the
developers to confirm this.

I have standardized on FreeBSD.

I apologized if I made it seem like I was trolling, not my intention.

If a business were to standardize on FreeBSD, they would love to know if the
multithreading issues would be fixed completely correctly not just
'work-arounds'.


sorry and thanks
- Original Message -
From: Chris Laverdure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Please explain.


 On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 02:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Ask the FreeBSD developers, any of them with honesty should tell you or
  proof me false. I dare you to proof this false, I would be so happy if
you
  did. Just because I'm using MS Mailer does not reflect whom I am. I have
  only 1 MS workstation with 9 others unix.
 
  I expected a mature response from most of you, calling names is NOT the
way
  to resolve problems. I just want an answer to see if this is true.
 
  **Is it true**? This is what I've noticed myself and many high-scale
  developers.
 
  Thank you

 1) The burden of proof is on the person making the allegations.

 2) Calling a troll on being a troll is mature.

 3) If you believe it to be true, then don't use FreeBSD. Nobody is tying
 your hands here. You believe DragonFlyBSD to be superior? Then use it.

 Maybe I just don't see the big deal here, but the developers owe you
 nothing.




___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


DVD question...

2004-09-18 Thread Glenn Sieb
Hey list!
I'm a BSD guy for servers  such. My own server (wingfoot) runs 
4.10-STABLE, and my last job was 95% FreeBSD in the data center.

I'm getting sick of Windows on my desktop at home. (No kidding, right?!) 
I'd really really really love to move my desktop to FBSD. One thing is 
really holding me back.

In Windows, I have Roxio Easy Media Creator 7, which allows me to 
manipulate AVI/MPEG streams, and format a DVD video disc and burn it, 
using my nifty TDK DVD 8x +/-RW drive.

I'm pretty sure I can find AVI/MPEG editing packages for BSD easy enough.
But I'm having a dickens of a time finding something that will let me 
author DVDs. Any pointing in directions or help would be greatly 
appreciated!

Thanks, everyone, in advance!
Best,
Glenn
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.  
 ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD firewall for lazy people

2004-09-18 Thread peter lageotakes

--- Björn Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm finding that configuring firewall/NAT rules on
 the gateway to my PPP
 connection is too much of a headache.
 
 Are there any FreeBSD based firewall distributions,
 something like
 http://thewall.sourceforge.net/, but with some sort
 of wrapper (web
 interface, curses interface, or whatever) for
 configuring pppoe, ipfw,
 NAT etc.?
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
http://m0n0.ch/wall/
www.closedbsd.org




__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Which Laser Printer for FreeBSD

2004-09-18 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt

Go buy a HP Laserjet 4M+ that's used.  For starters the things are
indestructible
you might have to do a feed roller replacement at 50,000 prints, but other
than
that you just keep putting toner and paper in it.  They are dirt cheap used
and
the remanufactured toner cartridges for them are also dirt cheap.  The
PostScript
is real PostScript.  They take an internal print server card that is also
dirt
cheap on the used market.

The problem with the cheapie Laserprinters like the 6L is they will fall
apart
after a few thousand prints, their toner cartridges are tiny which
necessitates
frequent replacement.

Keep in mind the printer companies have 2 markets they serve.  The first is
the
commercial market who cares about things like per-page costs.  The second is
the retail market comprised mostly of morons who only buy what's on sale and
couldn't calculate a per-page cost.

Customers in the first market are quite willing to pay a higher initial cost
for
the printer if the supplies are lower priced or more economical because it
drops
the per-page cost.  Thus, a printer that costs $199 that has a toner
cartridge that only prints 500 copies, and costs $100 to replace, will be
ignored in favor of a
printer that costs $1000 that has a toner cartridge that prints 3000 copies
and
costs $100 to replace.

Customers in the second market will ignore a $999 printer and buy the $199
printer.
This describes most retail customers to a T.

Now, it probably costs the printer manufacturer about $150.00 to manufacture
either
the $1000 printer or the $199 printer.  So, to maintain profitability on the
$199 printers, they give away the printer and make the money on the toner
cartridges.

The 4+ was in the business classification when it was new.  Thus you get the
benefit
of a $1000 printer that was designed for low page counts, for a low cost
initial
price.

Ted

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Moeller
 Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:40 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Which Laser Printer for FreeBSD


 Hi all,

 I'm planning to buy a new printer, because the results with my
 Canon S500 are
 total crap. I guess a laser printer is the best choice for Unix, and I'm
 wondering which one I should buy.

 I thought about the HP Laserjet 6L or something in this category.
 Any advice?

 Thanks!
 Martin
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Which Laser Printer for FreeBSD

2004-09-18 Thread Tim Aslat
In the immortal words of Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Go buy a HP Laserjet 4M+ that's used.  For starters the things are
 indestructible
 you might have to do a feed roller replacement at 50,000 prints, but
 other than
 that you just keep putting toner and paper in it.  They are dirt cheap
 used and
 the remanufactured toner cartridges for them are also dirt cheap.  The
 PostScript
 is real PostScript.  They take an internal print server card that is
 also dirt
 cheap on the used market.

I agree.  I have one of these given to me, and I have to admit, it's
basically wonderful.  Everything works with it, it spits out pages
perfectly every time.  It's a bit slow to warm up, but that's bearable
considering all it's benefits.
I'm up to around 4000 pages since I bought a toner for it, and I will
probably just get a refill cartridge for less than AU$50.  

You can usually pick these units up at auction for around the $20 mark,
or sometimes less.  Mine came with a second paper tray and a jet-direct
card, and I'm sure there are other nice extras that people are willing
to include just to take it off their hands.

Cheers

Tim


-- 
Tim Aslat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spyderweb Consulting
http://www.spyderweb.com.au
Phone: +61 0401088479
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


KDE / kdegraphics3 Build Failure

2004-09-18 Thread Michael G. Goodell
When I did a make install clean on the /usr/ports/x11/kde3 port it built
for a quite a while then died with this error:

/usr/local/include/kjs/lookup.h:96: warning: non-static const member `const
char* const KJS::HashTable::sbase' in class without a constructor gmake[3]:
*** [SVGColorProfileElement.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/kdegraphics3/work/kdegraphics-3.3.0/ksvg/dom' gmake[2]:
*** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/kdegraphics3/work/kdegraphics-3.3.0/ksvg' gmake[1]: ***
[all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/kdegraphics3/work/kdegraphics-3.3.0' gmake: *** [all]
Error 2 *** Error code 2  Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/kdegraphics3. ***
Error code 1  Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kde3.

I was told that I should replace the file /usr/include/sys/endian.h with a
new one that was emailed to me by a maintainer. It seems to have worked ok
but my question is this: I did a complete cvsup update just prior to
building kde3 and built he kernel and world on: Aug 27 22:24:12 MDT 2004 -
would not have rebuilding my kernel / cvsup fetched this new endian.h file?
If not why?

I hope I posted this OK - I am new to the mailing list thing.

Thanks,

Michael

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Question

2004-09-18 Thread stheg olloydson
It was said:

Hi,

  I Bought from you FreeBSD 4.10 v, my main concern after I installed
it in my laptop I have trouble defining my network wireless card
Linksys
wireless -B and the network, How can I do that?. Also Do I need the
device wi0?, and how can I find it?

  Sincerely,

 Ramez.

Hello,

Welcome to FreeBSD! I don't have a solution for you, but I can tell you
where to find it. Check the Handbook at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireless.html
(URL may have wrapped). Also, you can check the list archives through
http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists
(URL may have wrapped). Also, check google. FreeBSD and Linksys are
pretty common, so your question may be answered on a website. 
If you still can't find the information you need, repost to the list on
Monday. The list is fairly quiet on the weekends, so you will have a
much better chance of getting a more informative answer than mine.
As you are new to FreeBSD, you ought to read
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/article.html

(URL may have wrapped). It explains how to most easily get the greatest
amount of help from the list.

HTH,

Stheg 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Apache+mod_ssl + mod_php segfault (culprit found!)

2004-09-18 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Matthew Seaman wrote:
This sounds to me very much like you've got the mod_php loadable
object linked against an incompatible version of a shlib which
apach+mod_ssl is also linked to.  At a guess:
   i) I'd finger the OpenSSL libs as a prime suspect: particularly if
  you've also installed OpenSSL from ports.  It's not necessary
  to install OpenSSL from ports as the version in the base system
  is perfectly OK.
 

snip other good stuff
It certainly seems that you are right as usual, Matthew.
Removing openssl.so from /usr/local/lib/php/20020429
and restarting Apache works (no core dump!) ... albeit
PHP doesn't have OpenSSL support in it now, I guess ...
After checking with ldd(1) as you suggested ... how should
we fix this if we want PHP to have support for OpenSSL?
It's not that critical in my case ... but PHP is ;-)
RTFM pointers accepted :-)
Kevin Kinsey
DaleCo, S.P.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


panic: rtqkill route really not free

2004-09-18 Thread NetAdmin
I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 and today was the second time in 3
days that my box has rebooted with (panic: rtqkill route really not
free).  I've looked on the web but can't find anything relevant.  Has
anyone else run across this?  If so, could you point me to some help in
trying to figure out how to correct it?

Regards,

Mark

-- 
Admin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network.
The FoxSurfer Group


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: DVD question...

2004-09-18 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:44:14 -0400
Glenn Sieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey list!
 
 I'm a BSD guy for servers  such. My own server (wingfoot) runs 
 4.10-STABLE, and my last job was 95% FreeBSD in the data center.
 
 I'm getting sick of Windows on my desktop at home. (No kidding,
 right?!) I'd really really really love to move my desktop to FBSD.
 One thing is really holding me back.

 In Windows, I have Roxio Easy Media Creator 7, which allows me to 
 manipulate AVI/MPEG streams, and format a DVD video disc and burn
 it, using my nifty TDK DVD 8x +/-RW drive.

 I'm pretty sure I can find AVI/MPEG editing packages for BSD easy
 enough.

avidemux, mplayer, ffmpeg should take care of nearly all of your
needs
 
 But I'm having a dickens of a time finding something that will let
 me author DVDs. Any pointing in directions or help would be greatly 
 appreciated!

Try searching the ports tree :P

man ports

http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=dvdstype=all


I've personally have had better luck with mutlimedia and the like
under freebsd, than I ever have under windows.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]