Re: kerberos and openldap
Alexey Beketov wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to setup replace AD with samba, already have working
samba+ldap. And stuck with kerberos.
pkg_info:
heimdal-1.0.1
nss_ldap-1.264_1
openldap-client-2.4.13
openldap-server-2.4.13
cat /etc/krb5.conf
default = FILE:/var/log/krb5libs.log
kdc = FILE:/var/log/krb5kdc.log
admin_server = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log
[libdefaults]
default_realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
[realms]
DOMAIN.LOCAL = {admin_server = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL
default_domain = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL
kdc = SERVER.DOMAIN.LOCAL
}
[domain_realm]
.domain.local = DOMAIN.LOCAL
[kdc]
database = {
dbname = ldap:ou=KerberosPrincipals,dc=domain,dc=local
acl_file = /var/heimdal/kadmind.acl
}
addresses = 127.0.0.1 192.168.6.23
cat /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.conf
L: 1 C: 1 =
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/hdb.schema
pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid
argsfile/var/run/openldap/slapd.args
modulepath /usr/local/libexec/openldap
loglevel 256
logfile /var/db/openldap-data/slapd.log
moduleload back_bdb
allow update_anon
access to attrs=userPassword,shadowLastChange,sambaNTPassword,sambaLMPassword
by self write
by anonymous auth
by * none
access to *
by self write
by anonymous read
by sockurl=^ldapi:///$ write
by * none
databasebdb
suffix dc=domain,dc=local
rootdn cn=admin,dc=domain,dc=local
rootpw {SSHA}somepasshehe
directory /var/db/openldap-data
index uid,uidNumber,gidNumber,memberUid eq
index cn,mail,surname,givenname eq,subinitial
index sambaSIDeq
index sambaPrimaryGroupSIDeq
index sambaDomainName eq
index objectClass eq
#index cn eq,sub,pres
#index uid eq,sub,pres
index displayName eq,sub,pres
index krb5PrincipalName eq
server# kadmin -l
kadmin init DOMAIN.LOCAL
Realm max ticket life [unlimited]:
Realm max renewable ticket life [unlimited]:
kadmin add admin
Max ticket life [1 day]:
Max renewable life [1 week]:
Principal expiration time [never]:
Password expiration time [never]:
Attributes []:
ad...@domain.local's Password:
Verifying - ad...@domain.local's Password:
***erro here***
ad...@domain.local's Password:
kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Client (ad...@domain.local) unknown
***
how to fix the error?
Have you read the FreeBSD handbook about kerberos?
Have you setup the SRV records in DNS for kerberos?
Those would be my first places to check. I'm not dedicating myself to
do an open-source AD replacement, but it is something on my list I want
to do soon. Your help and input would be appreciated, given my goal
soon too.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: make installworld fails
Valentin Bud wrote: Hello, This are the parts from /etc/make.conf regarding system build options: # --- system build options WITHOUT_IPFILTER=yes WITHOUT_IPX=yes WITHOUT_LPR=yes WITHOUT_RCMDS=yes WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes I didn't give any arguments to # make buildworld or # make installworld I have ran them as i've typed them above. Is there something wrong in /etc/make.conf ? I should make sure it's mentioned -- FreeBSD 7.x started an /etc/src.conf that are the knobs for FreeBSD world ONLY. This leaves /etc/make.conf available for ports ONLY. I'd update your files, because there's a possibility your WITHOUT_ statements were ignored. --Tim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: installkernel on small disk
Albert Shih wrote: Hi all I've two servers (in fact guest in vmware) on don't have enought disk space to make buildkernel (or world). For the world freebsd-update can work. But for the kernel I've my own kernel. So if I compile the kernel on the other server how can I put it on the first ? Regards. With an NFS mount, with sneakernet, or scp. On the machine with enough disk space: make buildkernel installkernel DESTDIR=/nfsmount KERNCONF=otherkernel #hackish and i'd be worried of this. It will force a backup of the running kernel to the remote /boot/kernel.old I'd recommend: make buildkernel installkernel DESTDIR=/tmp KERNCONF=otherkernel tar -czf /tmp/otherkernel.tgz /tmp/boot/kernel # bring the otherkernel.tgz file to the machine, maybe by usb stick, and extract. don't forget to tar -xz*p*f (permissions) How thin on disk space are you? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: make installworld fails
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:45:59 -0700, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote: I should make sure it's mentioned -- FreeBSD 7.x started an /etc/src.conf that are the knobs for FreeBSD world ONLY. This leaves /etc/make.conf available for ports ONLY. I'd update your files, because there's a possibility your WITHOUT_ statements were ignored. IIRC, src.conf works in _addition_ to make.conf so having options in either one should be safe I think. The advice of keeping options cleanly separated is very sound though, to avoid confusion when these two files have conflicting options :-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to compile a network driver given source code
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Amer Alhabsi amer.alha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have Benq Joybook R43 notebook. It has network interface based on SiS 191. However, I can't configure it as it does not show up in ifconfig nor in sysinstall/configure/networking/interfaces. Dmesg says: No Driver Attached. After some search I found that someone has written a driver but it hasn't been put int the official FreeBSD release. I want to try my luck with the driver. My question is where to place the source code files? and how to compile it (I assume it can be part of a kernel rebuild if placed in the right directory) The source code for the driver consists of the 3 files: if_sis19x.c, if_sis19xreg.h and Makefile. Edit the Makefile to match the standard installation directories that FreeBSD uses (/usr/local), and use `make'. Depending on what the drivers needs are, you may have to edit more. Erm... I must've had a synaptic misfire. Not /usr/local, but /boot/modules. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD 6.3/7.1 and Linux disk performance test
Omer Faruk Sen wrote: as you can see there is a big difference in just simple dd test. Is there additional steps that I can follow to increase performance? Use a benchmark that matches your actual workload, and then see how things look. I would be surprised if your target workload was dd :-) Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: is there any way to increase disk performance ?
Tim Judd wrote: Yavuz wrote: I have freebsd7 (amd64 bit) and sata2 disk 7200 rpm. it's running mail server which has services like pop3,imap,smtp and webmail on this machine. When I type systat 1 -vmstat on command line, even I rarely see that disk usage hits 100%. I have no problem as ram and cpu. they is enough. is there any way to increase disk performance without causing any problem ? So in one second, the disk hits 100% utilization, weather it's reading or writing data to disk. You said above that I rarely see -- so even though, as a server, you're running slow spindles, you are doing pretty good. I've no real experience with a site that's (for example) been slashdotted, to test what is tolerable, and what's not. But as I currently guess, an OVERALL average between 25% to 33% is about as much as I would ever tax a server for CONSISTENT averages. So if you're seeing it rarely, such as when somebody hits webmail and takes 1 second of constant disk read to serve the content, I'd be happy there... I don't think you have a problem, when you put your concern into the broader scope of 1 minute, 1 hour, 1 day or 1 week. It'll be very difficult to never see 100% in 1 second no matter how powerful the machine is. Make sure you understand that gstat's %busy column does not tell you how close to capacity your disk is, it tells you what % of time it is handling I/O. Since modern drives can have many commands queued at any given time, those are not the same thing. To understand whether your disk is overloaded, look at the ms/r and ms/w times. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 7.1 release / apache22 / php5
LS, I hav e the same problem with 7.0 release. The libphp5.so is placed by the php5 port. When you deinstall php5, make clean, make config (check apache module), make install,...the libphp5.so is placed in the libexec directory. Or with clean installation, first install apache22 then php5. Danny van der Schaft - Original Message - From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com To: Jim Pazarena fqu...@ccstores.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:33 AM Subject: Re: 7.1 release / apache22 / php5 stan wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:52:10PM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: for some odd reason, with this latest install (7.1), apache22 complains that it cannot find libphp5.so I usually compile php5 from ports and apache22 from ports after I think about it, I have never actually placed libphp5.so anywhere. I am not even sure who/what causes php5 module to be added to /usr/local/libexec/apache22/libphp5.so it's present on my 7.0 system, and missing on my 7.1 system. advice would be much appreciated. I don't know if it's a change, but on the 7.1 machine I just built. the lang/php5 port was not configured by default to build the Apache module. It's been that way as far as I can remember (at least since 6.2-RELEASE). -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1874 - Release Date: 4-1-2009 16:32 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: make installworld fails
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote: Valentin Bud wrote: Hello, This are the parts from /etc/make.conf regarding system build options: # --- system build options WITHOUT_IPFILTER=yes WITHOUT_IPX=yes WITHOUT_LPR=yes WITHOUT_RCMDS=yes WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes I didn't give any arguments to # make buildworld or # make installworld I have ran them as i've typed them above. Is there something wrong in /etc/make.conf ? I should make sure it's mentioned -- FreeBSD 7.x started an /etc/src.conf that are the knobs for FreeBSD world ONLY. This leaves /etc/make.conf available for ports ONLY. I'd update your files, because there's a possibility your WITHOUT_ statements were ignored. Thanks for the heads up. I will start right away to move and organize these files. :) a great day, v --Tim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: shell commands - exclusion
On Friday 06 February 2009 02:55, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I think you should be able to do it with a combination of -prune and
-delete (or -exec rm -rf {} \; ) on a find command. Substitute your
other commands for rm -rf in the -exec above.
I would give you a working example except I can't figure out the syntax
for -prune. Examples from google don't seem to work in (my) FreeBSD.
[skip to the end for a simple answer without the lengthy exposition]
find(1) can be confusing, especially if you think of the ``actions''
( -print, -exec and -delete plus their variants like -ls and -ok ) as
something different from the ``tests'' ( -name and so on), or if you don't
take account of the evaluation order.
A find expression comprises a number of what the manpage calls primaries, each
of which evaluates as true or false. (It may also have a side-effect,
like -print whose side-effect is to print the name). Primaries can be
combined with -and (which is usually implied) or -or. Where -and and -or both
occur, find will group the -anded primaries together before evaluation.
Taking one of your examples below,
find . -print -or -prune -name dir1
this is grouped as
find . -print -or \( -prune -and -name dir1 \)
find will then evaluate the whole expression from left to right for each
pathname in the tree it's looking at, stopping within each set of (implied)
parentheses and within the overall expression as soon as it can determine
truth or falsehood. (This is what's referred to in programming as
short-circuiting in boolean expressions).
If primaries are linked by -and, find can stop at the first one that's false,
knowing the expression is false; if they're linked by -or it can stop at the
first one that's true, knowing the expression is true. Otherwise it has to
evaluate the whole expression.
Before it does this, though, find checks for side-effects. If there isn't a
side-effect anywhere in your expression, find will put brackets round the
whole expression and a -print after it.
Looking at your examples:
chr...@pcbsd% find .
(No expression). Find adds a -print, so this is the same as the next one:
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print
.
./test.mov
./test.mpg
./dir1
./dir1/file1
./dir1/file2
./file3
-print is always true so the expression is true for each name - they get
printed as a side-effect.
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print -o -prune dir1
find: dir1: unknown option
-prune doesn't take an argument, so dir1 is a syntax error.
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print -o -prune -name dir1
find evaluates the print, which prints each name as its side-effect. -print
evaluates as true. Since it's in an -or, find can stop there, so it never
sees the second expression ( -prune -and -name dir1: the -and is implicit).
.
./test.mov
./test.mpg
./dir1
./dir1/file1
./dir1/file2
./file3
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print -o -name dir1 -prune
Same again: find stops after the -print which is always true, and ignores
the -name dir1 -and -prune.
chr...@pcbsd% find . -name * -o -name dir1 -prune
None of these primaries has a side-effect, so find rewrites this internally as
find . \( -name * -or -name dir1 -prune \) -print
-name * is always true, so find can ignore everything after the -or up to
the parenthesis. Because the first expression is true, and the parens are
followed by (an implied) -and, find has to evaluate the -print, which is
always true, so the whole expression is always true and it always prints the
name as a side-effect.
.
./test.mov
./test.mpg
./dir1
./dir1/file1
./dir1/file2
./file3
What you need is an expression with two outcomes: a -prune for some names and
a -print for others. That tells you you need an -or, and the -print must come
after it because it's always true. Before the -or, -prune is always true so
you need some sort of testing primary before the -prune.
That gives you
find . -name dir1 -prune -or -print
Jonathan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to compile a network driver given source code
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:20:48 -0500 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Amer Alhabsi amer.alha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have Benq Joybook R43 notebook. It has network interface based on SiS 191. However, I can't configure it as it does not show up in ifconfig nor in sysinstall/configure/networking/interfaces. Dmesg says: No Driver Attached. After some search I found that someone has written a driver but it hasn't been put int the official FreeBSD release. I want to try my luck with the driver. My question is where to place the source code files? and how to compile it (I assume it can be part of a kernel rebuild if placed in the right directory) The source code for the driver consists of the 3 files: if_sis19x.c, if_sis19xreg.h and Makefile. Edit the Makefile to match the standard installation directories that FreeBSD uses (/usr/local), and use `make'. Depending on what the drivers needs are, you may have to edit more. Erm... I must've had a synaptic misfire. Not /usr/local, but /boot/modules. /boot/modules doesn't seem to be used any more: modules are put into /boot/kerneldir which is /boot/kernel by default. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How to compile a network driver given source code
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote: /boot/modules doesn't seem to be used any more: modules are put into /boot/kerneldir which is /boot/kernel by default. /boot/modules is still used. My ndis0 driver is located in /boot/modules and loaded via /boot/loader.conf at startup. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Problem when uploading files with Apache
Hello.
I use apache13 with FreeBSD 6.3.
I have some websites, in :
/var/www/sites/site1
/var/www/sites/site2
I use PHP 5 (compiled in apache module).
The rights are:
ls -ls /var/www/sites/site1: www:site1
All files are owned by www user. All files are grouped in site{1,2} group.
I have a php script in /var/www/sites/site1. I call it with
www.domain.com/test.php. If, in my php page, I create a folder (in
/var/www/sites/site1/), it have www:site1 in rights. Ok, it's good. However, if
I create a file, it have www:wheel in rights.
What's the problem?
Apache runs in www:www. I does not have folder grouped in wheel group.
Why Apache set 'wheel' as group when I upload a file?
Do you have advices, solutions... ?
Thanks!
--
-Nicolas.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers
Hello, I have to build a file server that will need to run a RAID 0+1 config and I'm looking for the best RAID controllers that run under Freebsd. My entire goal with using RAID 0+1 is having redundancy while utilizing most of the disk space. I realize the potential problems with this setup, the failure of the OS disk and booting for one and also dealing with the possibility of two drives failing within the same set. I guess I can deal with that(?) Anyway, What controllers have you found work well for you on F*BSD? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers
I have to build a file server that will need to run a RAID 0+1 config the best is gmirror+gstripe. of course for those who want to pay there are a lot of hardware solutions. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:50:34 -0500
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net
wrote:
Hello.
I use apache13 with FreeBSD 6.3.
I have some websites, in :
/var/www/sites/site1
/var/www/sites/site2
I use PHP 5 (compiled in apache module).
The rights are:
ls -ls /var/www/sites/site1: www:site1
All files are owned by www user. All files are grouped in site{1,2} group.
I have a php script in /var/www/sites/site1. I call it with
www.domain.com/test.php. If, in my php page, I create a folder (in
/var/www/sites/site1/), it have www:site1 in rights. Ok, it's good.
However, if I create a file, it have www:wheel in rights.
What's the problem?
Apache runs in www:www. I does not have folder grouped in wheel group.
Why Apache set 'wheel' as group when I upload a file?
Do you have advices, solutions... ?
I haven't used 1.3 in years... I don't think www:www is proper, but I
may be wrong. With 2.2.X, the permissions are root:wheel. What
happens when you execute the page? What is printed the error log?
Thanks for your response.
I have another FreeBSD (7.0) and Apache 1.3, and it works. On this machine
(6.3) it does not work.
When I upload a FILE, the rights are root:wheel ; when I create a folder, the
rights are www:site1.
www:site1 are rights of all files.
The problem is... I don't understand the wheel. Apache does not run in wheel.
All my folders/files are not grouped by wheel.
I don't understand WHY apache set 'wheel' in group...
I have nothing in log. Because there are no errors... All is ok... Just the
rights..
--
-Nicolas.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote: I have another FreeBSD (7.0) and Apache 1.3, and it works. On this machine (6.3) it does not work. What do you mean it does not work. You state below there are no errors. If it does not work there should be errors. The problem is... I don't understand the wheel. Apache does not run in wheel. All my folders/files are not grouped by wheel. 'wheel' is root's default group. I have nothing in log. Because there are no errors... All is ok... Just the rights.. But you say above it does not work. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:01:13 -0500
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net
wrote:
I have another FreeBSD (7.0) and Apache 1.3, and it works. On this machine
(6.3) it does not work.
What do you mean it does not work. You state below there are no
errors. If it does not work there should be errors.
It does not work because Apache don't set 'good rights'. Without error. So, for
Apache, there are no errors. For me, yes. It is not normal that the rights are
www:wheel.
The problem is... I don't understand the wheel. Apache does not run in
wheel. All my folders/files are not grouped by wheel.
'wheel' is root's default group.
But it is not the www's default group.
And Apache runs a www user. I *never* launch my scripts as root. So, that's why
I don't understand.
I have nothing in log. Because there are no errors... All is ok... Just the
rights..
But you say above it does not work.
It does not work because apache set www:wheel on rights when I UPLOAD a file ;
on the other hand, when I create file/folder, the rights are www:www.
When I launch this very simple script:
?php
$aa = fopen('./aaa', 'a+');
fclose($aa);
?
./aaa file is created with www:www.
So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel?
And WHY wheel group is used? This group may never be used for Apache.
--
-Nicolas.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 10gb network interface suggestions
2009/2/7 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl But also I am open to other brands. Especially If anyone has experience on that this matter would be very very helpful. I have seen that Sun has quad 10gbE adapters: http://www.sun.com/products/networking/ethernet/10gigethernet/index.xml I am not sure if FreeBSD supports that? could you please explain ANY CASE when 4*10GbE/s could be utilized. it's 5 GIGABYTES/s each direction. computer memory subsystem is rarely faster To be fair, the adaptor on the link is a dual port device (I looked with interest!), and Sun states the maximum is 16Gb/s aggregrate. A machine that is multi homed on 10G networks could use all ports. It doesn't mean it has to do 10G of traffic all the time. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: openoffice-3.0.1 broken on FreeBSD
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:35:43 -0500 Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote: Did you recompile OO after installing xorg-7.4? Yes, xorg was updated some days ago. I upgraded OO yesterday. -- The only thing better than love is milk. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net writes: So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting the group from the directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to get the gid of the directory. The directory you are uploading into should be owned by the group you want the files to have. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Subject: Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers To: Gabe n...@att.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 4:45 AM I have to build a file server that will need to run a RAID 0+1 config the best is gmirror+gstripe. of course for those who want to pay there are a lot of hardware solutions. ___ Hey I'm all for saving money, but I'm unsure of the reliability of a 'software' solution vs a hardware one. Not to mention my biggest concern which is the failure of the Boot drive and how to recover from that using software raid. Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net writes: So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting the group from the directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to get the gid of the directory. The directory you are uploading into should be owned by the group you want the files to have. That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. I upload into testdir/ which has www:www rights. And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel I don't understand. I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find the solution -- -Nicolas. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote: That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. I upload into testdir/ which has www:www rights. And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel What are the permissions on the file you are uploading? -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote: From: Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:02 AM On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net writes: So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting the group from the directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to get the gid of the directory. The directory you are uploading into should be owned by the group you want the files to have. That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. I upload into testdir/ which has www:www rights. And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel I don't understand. I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find the solution -- -Nicolas. 'www' wouldn't happen to be in the wheel group would it? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:11:27 -0800 (PST) Gabe n...@att.net wrote: --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote: From: Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:02 AM On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net writes: So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting the group from the directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to get the gid of the directory. The directory you are uploading into should be owned by the group you want the files to have. That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. I upload into testdir/ which has www:www rights. And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel I don't understand. I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find the solution -- -Nicolas. 'www' wouldn't happen to be in the wheel group would it? No, www is not a member of wheel group. -- -Nicolas. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:09:45 -0500 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote: That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. I upload into testdir/ which has www:www rights. And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel What are the permissions on the file you are uploading? I'm uploading the file from a web client. This is a php script. I have another FreeBSD (7.0), with the SAME apache, and I don't have the problem on it. Files uploaded are www:www (normal). On my machine (6.3), with the SAME apache, files uploaded are www:wheel. I set the *same* php script, I send the same file. I'm looking for differences between them, but none. -- -Nicolas. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
LOR listing?
There was at one time a list of lock order reversals, presumably at http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html I am unable to connect to that address. Has the address changed, or is the site experiencing problems? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:11:27 -0800 (PST) Gabe n...@att.net wrote: --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote: From: Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net Subject: Re: Problem when uploading files with Apache To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:02 AM On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 08:53:59 -0500 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net writes: So, anybody could explain me when I upload a file, rights are www:wheel? I'm going to guess that it's just inheriting the group from the directory. The normal default in BSD is for a file to get the gid of the directory. The directory you are uploading into should be owned by the group you want the files to have. That's I always learn. But in this case, it's not true. I upload into testdir/ which has www:www rights. And I launch my upload script, and the file is www:wheel I don't understand. I'm on this problem for 4 hours, and I don't find the solution -- -Nicolas. 'www' wouldn't happen to be in the wheel group would it? Ok, I found! Yeah. We must set a upload_tmp_dir (instead the default upload_dir). And this folder must have your rights. By default, this folder has root:wheel (in 1777 mod). So, when Apache copies uploaded files from this folder, it keep the wheel group. Hope this tip could help others persons. Thanks for your time and your advices. Regards, -- -Nicolas. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
portupgrade failing on perl modules
I'm having this with several perl modules while running a portupgrade -a. === p5-Tie-IxHash-1.21 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/p5-Tie-IxHash without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Tie-IxHash. *** Error code 1 I thought that portupgrade would take the right action to uninstall/reinstall if required. I mean, it upgrades ports, right? :) Some guidance would be appreciated. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. --Albert Einstein pgpq8s7nOwyt9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote: I'm having this with several perl modules while running a portupgrade -a. === p5-Tie-IxHash-1.21 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/p5-Tie-IxHash without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Tie-IxHash. *** Error code 1 Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said: Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? Here's an example. msoul...@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make deinstall Password: === Deinstalling for textproc/p5-XML-RSS === Deinstalling p5-XML-RSS-1.37 pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/auto/XML/RSS' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) msoul...@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make install distclean === p5-XML-RSS-1.43 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm - not found ===Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser === Installing for p5-XML-Parser-2.36 === p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 - found === p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found === Generating temporary packing list === Checking if textproc/p5-XML-Parser already installed === p5-XML-Parser-2.36 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of textproc/p5-XML-Parser without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-RSS. So now what? Mike -- Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. --Albert Einstein pgpovAmK1coTB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: LOR listing?
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:24:26 -0500, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: There was at one time a list of lock order reversals, presumably at http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html I am unable to connect to that address. Has the address changed, or is the site experiencing problems? While host, ping and traceroute work fine on the server you specified, there seems to be no HTTP response. -- Polytropon From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote: On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said: Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? Here's an example. msoul...@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make deinstall Password: === Deinstalling for textproc/p5-XML-RSS === Deinstalling p5-XML-RSS-1.37 pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/auto/XML/RSS' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) msoul...@kanga:...xtproc/p5-XML-RSS$ sudo make install distclean === p5-XML-RSS-1.43 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm - not found ===Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach/XML/Parser/Expat.pm in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser === Installing for p5-XML-Parser-2.36 === p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 - found === p5-XML-Parser-2.36 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found === Generating temporary packing list === Checking if textproc/p5-XML-Parser already installed === p5-XML-Parser-2.36 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of textproc/p5-XML-Parser without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-RSS. So now what? Have you rebuilt all perl-dependent ports as the 20090113 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING mentions? (Also, please take my email address out of your Reply-To entry in your client.) -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said: Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'? Yes, and the make install pulled in dependencies on other perl modules that resulted in the same error message that _they_ had to be reinstalled. Following those dependencies resulted in the same, and so on... I have no hair left to pull out, or it would be gone. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. --Albert Einstein pgpatVvbcWgvo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: broken ports
How did you uninstall that port after which everything fails at the configure stage? Which port was it? It was rtorrent that I uninstalled, I used make deinstall Check a couple of things: $ which c++ and: $ locate gcc_s | grep lib viper:~$ which c++ /usr/bin/c++ also viper:~$ which gcc /usr/bin/gcc viper:~$ which cc /usr/bin/cc viper:~$ locate gcc_s | grep lib |more /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so.1 Have you installed/uninstalled a c/c++ compiler from ports? I don't think that I have I haven't installed/uninstalled a compiler from ports unless one of the ports did it, and I doubt this is the case. David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Playing audio CDs
*snipped for polite cleanliness* Thanks to everyone who took the time to help me out here. I think instead of playing CDs I'll just rip them, it seems a WHOLE lot easier, and of course, not having to worry about scratches is a plus ;) I think one MAJOR problem I had yesterday when I was doing all this, was that I had been awake for about 27 hours...Which is more than most Windows boxes. I was trying to remember how to configure hardware because I'm basically spoiled by easy to configure OSs like BSD and Linux, that I literally couldn't remember how to configure stuff. I think you guys can agree to that. Back in like 2000 even, which wasn't THAT long ago, I know for a fact Windows and Linux were both very different, and this wasFreeBSD 4.0? 2000 is a little spacial, it's when I bought my very first FreeBSD PowerPak with FreeBSD 4.0 on CD, the 6 CD set of tools and things, and came with The Complete FreeBSD 3rd edition. Which I still read. Lehey is a great book writer. I think one problem also, is the sheer number of albums I have. I ahve a LOT of CDs, and almost all of them currently have been ripped, and I keep two HDs in my Slackware FTP server (Which may be reinstalled with FreeBSD, which is one reason I was testing how I'd do certain things in BSD) and I have over 30 GBs of music in there. Some albums that are important to me, like my Misfits boxed set, Ramones Discography, and rare Acid Bath Demo stuff, and my complete set of Danzig work (All Misfits, Samhain boxed set, + all Danzig CDs) I have all ripped as both oggVorbis, 128 K MP3s, and 320 K MP3s (I use 128 for my I-Pod because I have a 1 GB model, can't afford the big ones) and 320 I use for my play lists on the computer so I get good sound, and oggorbis was because a while back Linux distros like SUSE couldn't give you MP3 from out of the box, because of the license thing, so I kept ogg for that. It's something that took a LONG time to do and I'll probably just continue on with ripping the rest of my CD collection and putting it all on my FTP server so that each machine I have can play music without all of them losing disk space. Thanks again everyone! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
gtkpod permissions problem
I have installed gtkpod for use with my Nano, but I'm having a problem when trying to add files. The Nano is mounted at /mnt/ipod, and when I try to add a file I get a message similar to this: Transfer of 'Petite Fleur' failed. Error opening '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing (Permission denied). The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem, but I can't figure out its cause. TIA, ---Rem ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: gtkpod permissions problem
Rem P Roberti remeg...@comcast.net writes: I have installed gtkpod for use with my Nano, but I'm having a problem when trying to add files. The Nano is mounted at /mnt/ipod, and when I try to add a file I get a message similar to this: Transfer of 'Petite Fleur' failed. Error opening '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing (Permission denied). The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem, but I can't figure out its cause. Look at the permissions on that file, and the directory containing it, and the mount point. I'm sure at least one of them isn't sufficiently permitted to the user running gtkpod. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Preferred RAID controllers
Gabe wrote: --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl I have to build a file server that will need to run a RAID 0+1 config If you want reliability, then use RAID10, not RAID0+1. For RAID10, you first create mirrored pairs of drives, then you stripe across all the mirrors. This is superior to RAID0+1 where you divide your drives into two equal pools, create a stripe across all the drives in each pool, and then mirror the stripes. Raw to usable space ratio is the same, performance characteristics are similar and good either way (some workloads, particularly those involving lots of small random IOs are particularly favourable on RAID10 (eg like the usage pattern of most RDBMses) whereas sequentially streaming large single files is happiest on RAID0+1 (eg. recording or playing video streams)). However imagine a RAID consisting of 2N drives. If one drive fails, then in RAID10, *one* of your N mirrors is degraded, and the rest work normally. In RAID0+1, it's one of the 2 *stripes* that is degraded -- effectively taking out half of your drives. Or to put it another way: given one drive has already died and the RAID is degraded, in either scenario, just one more disk death can take the RAID out completely. However with RAID10 there's exactly 1 drive whose death could have that effect -- failure of any of the other 2N-2 drives will degrade the RAID further, but it will still keep working. With RAID0+1 if the second disk to fail is any of the N drives from the other stripe, it will kill the whole RAID array. the best is gmirror+gstripe. of course for those who want to pay there are a lot of hardware solutions. Hey I'm all for saving money, but I'm unsure of the reliability of a 'software' solution vs a hardware one. Not to mention my biggest concern which is the failure of the Boot drive and how to recover from that using software raid. Software striping and mirroring is extremely reliable -- probably more so than using a hardware RAID card as there's simply less to go wrong. On the other hand hardware RAID offers some big performance advantages by being able to cache data in battery backed RAM[*] on the card, instead of requiring you to wait until it's been written to persistent storage on the drives themselves. While you can certaily boot from a gmirror RAID1, I don't believe it's possible to boot from a gstripe -- but because this all works via the geom framework, you can create stripes / mirrors at the filesystem level -- so you can have a small separate RAID1 to boot from and to hold the OS (either a dedicated pair of disks, or a pair of equal sized partitions, and then create a RAID10 over the rest of the disks to hold your data. I believe there is no requirement for the component parts of a gstripe to all be the same size Cheers, Matthew [*] For mirroring and striping, the only real justification for using hardware RAID is the performance benefit from the Battery Backup Unit on the RAID card. For RAID5 while a BBU is a *really good idea* it can justify itself by offloading parity calculations from the main CPU. -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: broken ports
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:16:53PM +, David Collins wrote: How did you uninstall that port after which everything fails at the configure stage? Which port was it? It was rtorrent that I uninstalled, I used make deinstall Check a couple of things: $ which c++ and: $ locate gcc_s | grep lib viper:~$ which c++ /usr/bin/c++ also viper:~$ which gcc /usr/bin/gcc viper:~$ which cc /usr/bin/cc viper:~$ locate gcc_s | grep lib |more /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so.1 Have you installed/uninstalled a c/c++ compiler from ports? I don't think that I have I haven't installed/uninstalled a compiler from ports unless one of the ports did it, and I doubt this is the case. That all seems to be in order. I'm wondering whether your use of sudo is mucking things up and it's a permissions problem. i.e: it's running make OK but freaking out when it tries to invoke the compiler in the config stuff. I always build my ports using portupgrade as root. Maybe you could try logging in as root then running it. If you'd rather not do that, portupgrade has got an -s switch which allows you to run the commands via sudo but you'd probably have to put cc c++ in your sudoers (aswell as other commands e.g: install(1)). Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
andalusia grandfather retired grandfather unix, which is a scam
because we are going to fuck you with your frebsd including unix? I do not care who is better in fact I've managed and I advanced on unix / linux / windows or does not bear the gnu Haig was separately giving you even a unix incapie, for his gamble of free software (It's a good way to give new things, this includes retired old glories as unix,) asi junilas and grandparents uetro unix is part of the past porque nos os vais al carajo con vuestro frebsd incluido unix?? me da igual que sea mejor de hecho lo he manejado y tengo conocimientos avanzados sobre unix/linux/ windows o es que no soportais que la gnu se os haiga separado dandole incluso el incapie a unix, por su apuesta de la libertad de software ( es buena dar paso a la nuevas cosas ,eso incluye jubilar viejas glorias como unix, ) asi junilas ya abuelos uetro unix es parte del pasado parce que nous allons vas te faire encule avec votre frebsd notamment unix? Je ne suis pas de soins qui est mieux, en fait, j'ai réussi et j'ai progressé sur unix / linux / windows ou ne porte pas le gnu Haig séparément en vous donnant même un unix incapie, pour son pari du logiciel libre (C'est une bonne façon de donner de nouvelles choses, ce qui inclut les retraités anciens gloires comme unix), asi junilas et grands uetro unix fait partie du passé da wir ficken Sie mit Ihrem frebsd einschließlich unix? Ich weiss nicht, wer besser ist in der Tat habe ich geschafft und ich erweiterte auf UNIX / Linux / Windows oder nicht mit der GNU Haig wurde getrennt, die Sie selbst ein Unix-incapie, für seine Gamble von freier Software (Es ist ein guter Weg, um neue Dinge, dazu gehört auch Rentner alte Herrlichkeiten wie Unix,) asi junilas und Großeltern uetro Unix ist ein Teil der Vergangenheit _ Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=createwx_url=/friends.aspxmkt=en-us___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said:
Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'?
Yes, and the make install pulled in dependencies on other perl modules that
resulted in the same error message that _they_ had to be reinstalled.
Following those dependencies resulted in the same, and so on...
I have no hair left to pull out, or it would be gone.
I'd wager that 'pkg_info -l p5-Module-Giving-You-Trouble' says everything
is installed under ${LOCALBASE}/lib/perl5/site-perl/5.8.8 but that if you
run 'perl -v' the number 5.8.9 is prominently displayed.
Please read the UPDATING entry for 20090113, strike yourself upon the
forehead whilst crying D'oh! in a loud voice and then run
'perl-after-upgrade -f' as instructed.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: portupgrade failing on perl modules
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/02/09 Glen Barber said:
Have you tried manually `make deinstall; make install'?
Yes, and the make install pulled in dependencies on other perl
modules that
resulted in the same error message that _they_ had to be reinstalled.
Following those dependencies resulted in the same, and so on...
I have no hair left to pull out, or it would be gone.
I'd wager that 'pkg_info -l p5-Module-Giving-You-Trouble' says everything
is installed under ${LOCALBASE}/lib/perl5/site-perl/5.8.8 but that if you
run 'perl -v' the number 5.8.9 is prominently displayed.
Please read the UPDATING entry for 20090113, strike yourself upon the
forehead whilst crying D'oh! in a loud voice and then run
'perl-after-upgrade -f' as instructed.
Cheers,
Matthew
Actually, I was having that trouble, too. But for me the solution was
to deinstall perl-threaded, pkg_delete -f the non-deinstalled perl
5.8.9, rmconfig make config-recursive in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8,
make sure the build threaded perl was unchecked and make install clean
from there. Before doing all that, I had run perl-after-upgrade
(several times) to no avail.
I'm not sure how I ended up with 2 perls installed, or why deinstalling
perl-threaded left one remaining, but all was (is) well after I reverted
perl as above.
Tim
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: broken ports
I'm wondering whether your use of sudo is mucking things up and it's a
permissions problem. i.e: it's running make OK but freaking out when
it tries to invoke the compiler in the config stuff.
I always build my ports using portupgrade as root.
Maybe you could try logging in as root then running it. If you'd
rather not do that, portupgrade has got an -s switch which allows you
to run the commands via sudo but you'd probably have to put cc c++
in your sudoers (aswell as other commands e.g: install(1)).
I tried running portupgrade as root user, not sudo, and no success.
The bottom line is
--- Packages processed: 2 done, 69 ignored, 133 skipped and 28 failed
I think the most pressing issue is that I am not able to compile. I
have watched the output periodically and I saw a lot of configure
errors. Picking one at random this is the config.log (grub) file, the
error being compiler is unable to create executables exit 77:
I think if this were to be solved then my ports would be unbroken!
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
It was created by GRUB configure 0.97, which was
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.62. Invocation command line was
$ ./configure --libdir=/usr/local/share --prefix=/usr/local
--mandir=/usr/local/man --infodir=/usr/local/info/
--build=i386-freebsd-freebsd7.0
## - ##
## Platform. ##
## - ##
hostname = viper.homeunix.com
uname -m = i386
uname -r = 7.0-RELEASE-p7
uname -s = FreeBSD
uname -v = FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sun Dec 21 12:33:45 UTC 2008
r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
/usr/bin/uname -p = i386
/bin/uname -X = unknown
/bin/arch = unknown
/usr/bin/arch -k = unknown
/usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown
/usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown
/bin/machine = unknown
/usr/bin/oslevel = unknown
/bin/universe = unknown
PATH: /sbin
PATH: /bin
PATH: /usr/sbin
PATH: /usr/bin
PATH: /usr/games
PATH: /usr/local/sbin
PATH: /usr/local/bin
PATH: /home/davidcollins/Library/bin
## --- ##
## Core tests. ##
## --- ##
configure:2048: checking for a BSD-compatible install
configure:2116: result: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel
configure:2127: checking whether build environment is sane
configure:2170: result: yes
configure:2232: checking for gawk
configure:2248: found /usr/local/bin/gawk
configure:2259: result: gawk
configure:2270: checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)
configure:2292: result: yes
configure:2483: checking build system type
configure:2501: result: i386-freebsd-freebsd7.0
configure:2523: checking host system type
configure:2538: result: i386-freebsd-freebsd7.0
configure:2576: checking whether to enable maintainer-specific
portions of Makefiles
configure:2585: result: no
configure:2704: checking for gcc
configure:2731: result: cc
configure:2805: checking for gcc
configure:2832: result: cc
configure:3070: checking for C compiler version
configure:3078: cc --version 5
cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
configure:3082: $? = 0
configure:3089: cc -v 5
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
configure:3093: $? = 0
configure:3100: cc -V 5
cc: '-V' option must have argument
configure:3104: $? = 1
configure:3127: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:3149: cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe conftest.c 5
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
configure:3153: $? = 1
configure:3191: result:
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h. */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME GRUB
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME grub
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION 0.97
| #define PACKAGE_STRING GRUB 0.97
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT bug-g...@gnu.org
| #define PACKAGE grub
| #define VERSION 0.97
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| int
| main ()
| {
|
| ;
| return 0;
| }
configure:3197: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
## ##
## Cache variables. ##
## ##
ac_cv_build=i386-freebsd-freebsd7.0
ac_cv_env_CC_set=set
ac_cv_env_CC_value=cc
ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_set=set
ac_cv_env_CFLAGS_value='-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe'
ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_set=''
ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_value=''
ac_cv_env_CPP_set=''
ac_cv_env_CPP_value=''
ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_set=''
ac_cv_env_LDFLAGS_value=''
ac_cv_env_LIBS_set=''
ac_cv_env_LIBS_value=''
ac_cv_env_build_alias_set=set
ac_cv_env_build_alias_value=i386-freebsd-freebsd7.0
ac_cv_env_host_alias_set=''
ac_cv_env_host_alias_value=''
ac_cv_env_target_alias_set=''
ac_cv_env_target_alias_value=''
ac_cv_host=i386-freebsd-freebsd7.0
ac_cv_prog_AWK=gawk
ac_cv_prog_ac_ct_CC=cc
ac_cv_prog_make_gmake_set=yes
Re: shell commands - exclusion
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Friday 06 February 2009 02:55, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I think you should be able to do it with a combination of -prune and
-delete (or -exec rm -rf {} \; ) on a find command. Substitute your
other commands for rm -rf in the -exec above.
I would give you a working example except I can't figure out the syntax
for -prune. Examples from google don't seem to work in (my) FreeBSD.
[skip to the end for a simple answer without the lengthy exposition]
find(1) can be confusing, especially if you think of the ``actions''
( -print, -exec and -delete plus their variants like -ls and -ok ) as
something different from the ``tests'' ( -name and so on), or if you don't
take account of the evaluation order.
A find expression comprises a number of what the manpage calls primaries, each
of which evaluates as true or false. (It may also have a side-effect,
like -print whose side-effect is to print the name). Primaries can be
combined with -and (which is usually implied) or -or. Where -and and -or both
occur, find will group the -anded primaries together before evaluation.
Taking one of your examples below,
find . -print -or -prune -name dir1
this is grouped as
find . -print -or \( -prune -and -name dir1 \)
find will then evaluate the whole expression from left to right for each
pathname in the tree it's looking at, stopping within each set of (implied)
parentheses and within the overall expression as soon as it can determine
truth or falsehood. (This is what's referred to in programming as
short-circuiting in boolean expressions).
If primaries are linked by -and, find can stop at the first one that's false,
knowing the expression is false; if they're linked by -or it can stop at the
first one that's true, knowing the expression is true. Otherwise it has to
evaluate the whole expression.
Before it does this, though, find checks for side-effects. If there isn't a
side-effect anywhere in your expression, find will put brackets round the
whole expression and a -print after it.
Looking at your examples:
chr...@pcbsd% find .
(No expression). Find adds a -print, so this is the same as the next one:
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print
.
./test.mov
./test.mpg
./dir1
./dir1/file1
./dir1/file2
./file3
-print is always true so the expression is true for each name - they get
printed as a side-effect.
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print -o -prune dir1
find: dir1: unknown option
-prune doesn't take an argument, so dir1 is a syntax error.
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print -o -prune -name dir1
find evaluates the print, which prints each name as its side-effect. -print
evaluates as true. Since it's in an -or, find can stop there, so it never
sees the second expression ( -prune -and -name dir1: the -and is implicit).
.
./test.mov
./test.mpg
./dir1
./dir1/file1
./dir1/file2
./file3
chr...@pcbsd% find . -print -o -name dir1 -prune
Same again: find stops after the -print which is always true, and ignores
the -name dir1 -and -prune.
chr...@pcbsd% find . -name * -o -name dir1 -prune
None of these primaries has a side-effect, so find rewrites this internally as
find . \( -name * -or -name dir1 -prune \) -print
-name * is always true, so find can ignore everything after the -or up to
the parenthesis. Because the first expression is true, and the parens are
followed by (an implied) -and, find has to evaluate the -print, which is
always true, so the whole expression is always true and it always prints the
name as a side-effect.
.
./test.mov
./test.mpg
./dir1
./dir1/file1
./dir1/file2
./file3
What you need is an expression with two outcomes: a -prune for some names and
a -print for others. That tells you you need an -or, and the -print must come
after it because it's always true. Before the -or, -prune is always true so
you need some sort of testing primary before the -prune.
That gives you
find . -name dir1 -prune -or -print
Jonathan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Thank you for this excellent answer! Now reading the man page begins to
make sense.
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
How to add KDE-SVN to KDE4
Hi, Well, I got KDE4 to install and I like it! However, I noticed that the KDE-SVN package, which I installed for KDE3, isn't accessible as it currently sits for KDE4. Would anyone here know how to make it accessible to KDE4? Thanks, Andy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: gtkpod permissions problem
Rem P Roberti remeg...@comcast.net writes: I have installed gtkpod for use with my Nano, but I'm having a problem when trying to add files. The Nano is mounted at /mnt/ipod, and when I try to add a file I get a message similar to this: Transfer of 'Petite Fleur' failed. Error opening '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing (Permission denied). The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem, but I can't figure out its cause. Look at the permissions on that file, and the directory containing it, and the mount point. I'm sure at least one of them isn't sufficiently permitted to the user running gtkpod. You were quite right. I was dealing with a Nano that already had files on it installed by iTunes. Nothing that I could do, even as root, would allow me to change the permissions of /mnt/ipod. To make a long story short, I cleared the Nano of all previously installed files, and started from zero with gtkpod and now everything works smoothly. I'm still not sure why I wasn't able to change the permissions of the mounted Nano as su, but I guess that is typical when dealing with mounted devices. --Rem ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: broken ports
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:24:52PM +, David Collins wrote: I'm wondering whether your use of sudo is mucking things up and it's a permissions problem. i.e: it's running make OK but freaking out when it tries to invoke the compiler in the config stuff. I always build my ports using portupgrade as root. Maybe you could try logging in as root then running it. If you'd rather not do that, portupgrade has got an -s switch which allows you to run the commands via sudo but you'd probably have to put cc c++ in your sudoers (aswell as other commands e.g: install(1)). I tried running portupgrade as root user, not sudo, and no success. The bottom line is --- Packages processed: 2 done, 69 ignored, 133 skipped and 28 failed I think the most pressing issue is that I am not able to compile. I have watched the output periodically and I saw a lot of configure errors. Picking one at random this is the config.log (grub) file, the error being compiler is unable to create executables exit 77: I think if this were to be solved then my ports would be unbroken! Sorry, I got distracted forgot your compiler toolchain is broken. What does: $ ldconfig -r | grep gcc_s give you? If it fails to return anything, then you might want to try running ldconfig: # /etc/rc.d/ldconfig start Then try grepping ldconfig -r output again. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Installing php5 from ports
Hi everyone, I've run into a bit of an issue while trying to install php5 from ports. I've been playing around trying to create an accurate howto for setting up apache, mysql, and php on this machine. So I've actually installed and deinstalled a couple of times already. This last time the message below came up. # make install === Installing for php5-5.2.8 === php5-5.2.8 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/apxs - found === php5-5.2.8 depends on executable: pkg-config - found === php5-5.2.8 depends on shared library: xml2.5 - found === Generating temporary packing list === Checking if lang/php5 already installed Makefile, line 612: warning: duplicate script for target main/internal_functions.lo ignored Installing PHP SAPI module: apache /usr/local/share/apache22/build/instdso.sh SH_LIBTOOL='/usr/local/build-1/libtool' libs/libphp5.so /usr/local/libexec/apache /usr/local/build-1/libtool --mode=install cp libs/libphp5.so /usr/local/libexec/apache/ cp libs/libphp5.so /usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp5.so Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp5.so. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. chmod 755 /usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp5.so apxs:Error: Config file /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf not found. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5/work/php-5.2.8. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5. The only sense I can make of it is it wants to install the apache module, but it can't find httpd.conf under /usr/local/etc/apache/ No surprise that as httpd.conf is under /usr/local/etc/apache22/ Is there a way to force the install to look in the correct path? Thanks everyone :) -- Tim ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Installing php5 from ports
Tim DeBoer wrote: The only sense I can make of it is it wants to install the apache module, but it can't find httpd.conf under /usr/local/etc/apache/ No surprise that as httpd.conf is under /usr/local/etc/apache22/ Is there a way to force the install to look in the correct path? WITH_APACHE2= yes APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 in /etc/make.conf Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: broken ports
What does: $ ldconfig -r | grep gcc_s give you? viper:~$ ldconfig -r | grep gcc_s 247:-lgcc_s.1 = /usr/local/lib/gcc-4.2.5/libgcc_s.so.1 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
