FreeBSD on EC2

2011-10-31 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I've been experimenting with FreeBSD on EC2, in the hopes that I can
move some systems there. I'm pleased with the possibilities, but have a
two initial questions:

First, the t1.micro instance, which I'm starting with, is supposed to
have 10 GB of EBS storage--1GB for the kernel on the boot partition, and
9GB for the rest. But my instance only has 4.8GB on root:

$ df -h
FilesystemSizeUsed   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
/dev/da1s14.8G4.1G332M93%/
devfs 1.0K1.0K  0B   100%/dev
/dev/da0  1.0G 21M944M 2%/boot/grub

Where's the rest? I asked about this in the EC2 forums, and someone said
that it's probably unformatted space on a different partition; if so, I
could use some advice about adding this to the existing root partition,
and I'm also curious why this would be set up like this. 4.8GB isn't
enough for me to compile everything I need, even if I put my data on
another EBS volume

Second, the FreeBSD on EC2 page at
http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/ says that the first instance
of 8.2b-RELEASE is for t1.micro instances only, but when I start this
instance, I'm given the option of starting it as t1.micro, m1.small, or
c1.medium (the high-CPU medium option). In production I'd like to run
this as the m1.small or the m1.large instance; I guess there's no large
instance possible but is there any problem with using the small? Is
there any time frame for the availability of a large instance? I think
I'm going to need to use EC2 instead of buying a new physical server,
and I'd really rather stick with FreeBSD instead of moving to Debian

Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Creating network interface in VM?

2008-11-15 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-BETA2 in a virtual machine in
VirtualBox, running on a Linux (Debian) host. I was able to
set up everything quite easily, and originally set up
networking over NAT. But after some questions on the VB
mailing list about accessing the guest from the host (so I can
use the FreeBSD VM as a test server from my host), I decided
to set up Host Interface Networking (without bridging, as I
only want the VM visible to the host, not the rest of the
network).

The instructions I was following were pretty straightforward,
though they were for a Linux guest:

---
auto vbox0
iface vbox0 inet static
address 192.168.5.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
---

is the setup for the Linux host, and the guest is supposed to
be the same thing with a different IP address. Using this alone,
I was already able to reach the Linux host from my FreeBSD VM.

I tried to set this up on the FreeBSD side, but I am unable to
even create the vbox0 interface:

---
# ifconfig vbox0 create
ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE2: Invalid argument
---

Googling hasn't been much help. How do I get this done?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Creating network interface in VM?

2008-11-15 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 07:52:18PM -0600, Steven Susbauer wrote:
 Polytropon wrote:
  On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:17:25 -0500, Jesse Sheidlower [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-BETA2 in a virtual machine in
  VirtualBox, running on a Linux (Debian) host.
  [...]
  I tried to set this up on the FreeBSD side, but I am unable to
  even create the vbox0 interface:
 
  ---
  # ifconfig vbox0 create
  ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE2: Invalid argument
  ---
 
  
  I'm not sure, but I think what you're searching for would be to
  have VB create a NIC substitute for the FreeBSD guest OS. When
  you said, you could reach network from out of the FreeBSD VB,
  a virtual network adapter. Which interface did you use from
  within FreeBSD?
  
  As far as I know, there's no vbox (pseudo)interface driver in
  FreeBSD, that's why the ifconfig create command returned an error.
  
  
  
 The guest machine is always going to use the virtual driver provided by
 virtualbox, which is configured through the virtualbox gui control
 before you start the machine. I suggest trying to configure that
 interface, not vbox0. vbox0 is an interface on the host OS.

Ah, of course. That makes total sense, sorry I didn't grok this
before.

One of the virtual network cards worked fine, using the le0
driver, so I set up the le0 driver to use NAT to reach the
outside, and then configured VB to use the same kind of
virtual network card to run HIF networking, and set up the le1
driver in my FreeBSD machine at the appropriate addresses.
Now everything works: I can reach the outside via the le0
driver and I can reach to and from my host with the le1
driver.

Thanks!

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Wrong dependency being installed

2008-07-07 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running apache22 on a FreeBSD-7.0 system. When I try to
install the port www/mod_line_edit, the ports system tries to
install apache20 alongside of it, despite the fact that I have
apache22 installed already.

The Makefile has WITH_APACHE2=YES, but if I change this to
WITH_APACHE22, then it tries to install apache13.

How can I use the ports system to build this against my
installed version of Apache?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Wrong dependency being installed

2008-07-07 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:18:01PM +0200, Mel wrote:
 On Monday 07 July 2008 15:07:23 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  I'm running apache22 on a FreeBSD-7.0 system. When I try to
  install the port www/mod_line_edit, the ports system tries to
  install apache20 alongside of it, despite the fact that I have
  apache22 installed already.
 
  The Makefile has WITH_APACHE2=YES, but if I change this to
  WITH_APACHE22, then it tries to install apache13.
 
  How can I use the ports system to build this against my
  installed version of Apache?
 
 APACHE_PORT=www/apache22  /etc/make.conf
 
 See /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.apache.mk for details.

Thanks, that did the trick.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Can't log in as root on new 7.0 install

2008-04-14 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I've recently installed FreeBSD 7.0 on a new server. I seem to
be unable to log in as root in any way, and I'm not sure why.
Furthermore I'm now physically separate from the machine, and
have been relying on a (non-computer-literate) colleague with
access to its console server to try and help.

After the initial install I (am pretty sure I) was able to log
in as root over ssh. However, after a week when the machine
was inaccessible for other reasons, I cannot log in as root,
only as a normal user.

I thought that I had perhaps mis-remembered the root password,
so I directed the colleague to log in in single user mode and
reset the root password; she was able to do this, and typed
exit to return the system to multi-user mode and herself at
a root prompt. However I was still not able to log in as root,
either over ssh, or by logging in as a normal user and then
typing login root (i.e. it wasn't just something preventing
root logins over ssh).

I then asked the colleague to add me to the wheel group,
which she successfully did; I logged out and back in again,
determined that I was indeed in this group, and tried to su - 
and got a su: Sorry message, with the colleague reporting
that a BAD SU [user] to root on /dev/ttyp0 message had
appeared.

I'm sort of at a loss for what to do or why this is happening,
and am quite eager to control my own machineSuggestions
welcome.

Thanks very much.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Can't log in as root on new 7.0 install

2008-04-14 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:04:21AM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote:
 At 09:35 AM 4/14/2008, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 I've recently installed FreeBSD 7.0 on a new server. I seem to
 be unable to log in as root in any way, and I'm not sure why.
 Furthermore I'm now physically separate from the machine, and
 have been relying on a (non-computer-literate) colleague with
 access to its console server to try and help.
 
 After the initial install I (am pretty sure I) was able to log
 in as root over ssh. However, after a week when the machine
 was inaccessible for other reasons, I cannot log in as root,
 only as a normal user.
 
 I thought that I had perhaps mis-remembered the root password,
 so I directed the colleague to log in in single user mode and
 reset the root password; she was able to do this, and typed
 exit to return the system to multi-user mode and herself at
 a root prompt. However I was still not able to log in as root,
 either over ssh, or by logging in as a normal user and then
 typing login root (i.e. it wasn't just something preventing
 root logins over ssh).
 
 I then asked the colleague to add me to the wheel group,
 which she successfully did; I logged out and back in again,
 determined that I was indeed in this group, and tried to su -
 and got a su: Sorry message, with the colleague reporting
 that a BAD SU [user] to root on /dev/ttyp0 message had
 appeared.
 
 I'm sort of at a loss for what to do or why this is happening,
 and am quite eager to control my own machineSuggestions
 welcome.
 
 Thanks very much.
 
 Jesse Sheidlower
 
 I would have your helper log in as root and reboot the server.  This will 
 assure it is in multi-user.
 
 You should NOT be able to ssh in as root, unless you've opened up that 
 security hole which is not recommended.

My helper did successfully log in as root over the console,
and rebooted the server. However, all of my above problems are
still the case: I cannot log in as root over ssh (OK, you
addressed this), or by logging in as a regular user and doing
a login root; and I cannot su to root even though I'm in the
wheel group.

When this is up and running I won't allow root logins at all,
but my issue right now is that I'm not at the console and need
to actually install things on the machine (sudo, for
example...). So aside from being on the console, how _can_ I
get this access on the machine?

Thanks again.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Can't log in as root on new 7.0 install

2008-04-14 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:01:22PM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 My helper did successfully log in as root over the console,
 and rebooted the server. However, all of my above problems are
 still the case: I cannot log in as root over ssh (OK, you
 addressed this), or by logging in as a regular user and doing
 a login root; and I cannot su to root even though I'm in the
 wheel group.
 
 When this is up and running I won't allow root logins at all,
 but my issue right now is that I'm not at the console and need
 to actually install things on the machine (sudo, for
 example...). So aside from being on the console, how _can_ I
 get this access on the machine?
 
 Thanks again.
 
 Jesse Sheidlower
 
 Are you logging in as a regular user then trying to su to root?  If you 
 are, what error are you getting?
 
 When you first login type:
 id
 and verify you are in the wheel group.

I had done this, but I just discovered the problem: I was
trying to su to root using the _user's_ password, not the
_root_ password.  I don't normally use su, I use sudo.

But now that I can in fact get to root this way, I'm on my
way.

Thanks very much.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Installing FreeBSD remotely via serial console

2008-03-05 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:13:21PM -0500, Simon Chang wrote:
 Hi,
 
   Not sure whether Dell hardware has any special management features, but on
   generic server hardware, I always make sure BIOS console redirection is
   enabled (gives you BIOS access), and that it's set to stop redirecting once
   the OS boots.
 
 If it is one of the newer Dells, there is a feature called Remote
 Access Server that is built-in and has a special Ethernet port for it
 (the symbol above the physical port is that of a wrench).  Read the
 documentation, but I believe it will get you BIOS messages, etc.
 
 What model of Dell server is it?

I think it's the PowerEdge 1950, though oddly it doesn't say
on my invoice. In any case, it does have the Remote Access
Card, so I'm going to look through the docs on this and see if
this is the right way to go.

Thanks to everyone who replied on this; will report on how the
install goes.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Installing FreeBSD remotely via serial console

2008-03-04 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm getting a new Dell server delivered to our corporate
datacenter. There is a serial console available there.

What is the process for installing FreeBSD remotely by logging
in to the serial console? I'm assuming that I can get a tech
in the datacenter to put a FreeBSD install disc into the CD
drive, and take it from there, but I've never used a serial
console and don't know what the process is.

I'm trying to avoid having to either travel to the datacenter
myself, or to get the server shipped to me here for
installation and then shipped down to the datacenter.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hardware RAID diagnostics (Dell PERC 6/i)

2008-02-19 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm in the process of getting a new server, and have been
planning on a Dell PowerEdge 1950.

I see from this thread:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-January/039675.html

That the PERC 6/i RAID controller seems to work fine with the
mfi(4) driver; I was planning on a 4 x 73GB RAID5 setup, so
the problems about addressing  1TB don't seem to apply.

My straightforward question is just wondering about how you
get diagnostics from this device. My server will be in a
remote location, so I'm curious how I would even know if a
disk has failed. There wasn't anything about this in the
mfi(4) manpage, nor in the RAID section of the Handbook.

My current server is in a 2 x 18GB RAID1 setup, but I pretty
much plugged it in and it Just Worked, and I never thought
about it any more; this time I'd like to know more about how
to manage it.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: em0 invalid checksum on new T60

2007-02-22 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:36:19AM -0500, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 I just got my new ThinkPad T60 and have been installing merrily
 away. So far most things have worked fine, though I still have 
 lots to do and will no doubt have a few more questions.
 
 A big one right off the start, though, is that my Ethernet card
 is not working. On boot I get this:
 
 ---
 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 6.2.9 port 
 0x3000-0x301f mem 0xee00-0xee01 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2
 em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid
 em0: Unable to initialize the hardware
 device_attach: em0 attach returned 5
 ---

(Self-reporting here--I did some more searching, and found
comments about the need to plug in a working Ethernet cable
before booting.  I did this, and now it seems to be working
fine, even when later rebooting without a cable.)

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


em0 invalid checksum on new T60

2007-02-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I just got my new ThinkPad T60 and have been installing merrily
away. So far most things have worked fine, though I still have 
lots to do and will no doubt have a few more questions.

A big one right off the start, though, is that my Ethernet card
is not working. On boot I get this:

---
em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 6.2.9 port 0x3000-0x301f 
mem 0xee00-0xee01 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2
em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid
em0: Unable to initialize the hardware
device_attach: em0 attach returned 5
---

I Googled for this and saw very few reports of this error; a
post from Dan Langille in 2004 suggested adding
hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range=1 to /boot/loader.conf,
but this had no effect.

Any other thoughts? The Atheros card was detected and is 
working fine, so I have WiFi, but it'll be tough to
function without an Ethernet connection.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Diagnosing fan problem

2007-02-16 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Tore Lund wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  I have a ThinkPad T41p that has had a variety of fan problems
  for some time. After my most recent repair things seemed to be
  working fine, but the other day I was compiling some ports and
  the machine just shut down in the middle; after some
  experimentation it seemed clear that it was just overheating
  under load and shutting itself off. (Looking at the
  temperature sysctl showed that it was getting increasingly hot
  until it crashed.)
  
  How can I monitor what is happening? Are there any ways I can
  find out from FreeBSD if the fan is even on, or how it thinks
  it is working? systcl -a | grep fan didn't return anything.
 
 There are quite a few programs that can tell you CPU temperature and fan
 speed, like mbmon and conky, both in /usr/ports/sysutils.  You could
 compare these parameters against data for the fan and cooler in order to
 ascertain whether anything is wrong with the fan.

Unfortunately these don't work, or rather they don't report the
fan speed. (In conky, for example, if I add lines to the config file
to report the CPU temp, fan speed, and fan state, I only get the
CPU temp, with the other lines empty.)

  Can I control the fan?
 
 I don't know.  In any case, I would not try to control fan speed if the
 problem is that the fan is insufficient or out of order.

Right; my intention wasn't to control the fan manually for
regular use, but rather to try to turn the fan on high so that
I can see if there is, in fact, a whooshing sound that would
indicate the fan has been turned on high.

I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE, by the way; I acknowledge that
there is the acpi_ibm.ko thing under 6.x, and perhaps this would
be helpful. However I can't even think about upgrading because
compiling almost anything causes the computer to crash from
overheating :-/

Jesse Sheidlower

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Diagnosing fan problem

2007-02-15 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I have a ThinkPad T41p that has had a variety of fan problems
for some time. After my most recent repair things seemed to be
working fine, but the other day I was compiling some ports and
the machine just shut down in the middle; after some
experimentation it seemed clear that it was just overheating
under load and shutting itself off. (Looking at the
temperature sysctl showed that it was getting increasingly hot
until it crashed.)

How can I monitor what is happening? Are there any ways I can
find out from FreeBSD if the fan is even on, or how it thinks
it is working? systcl -a | grep fan didn't return anything.
Can I control the fan?

I don't want to make yet another warranty call if they're
gonna say, It's working fine, it's your OS or something.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Firefox is already running problem on 6.0

2006-02-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

When I try to launch Firefox, I get a message reading Firefox is
already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you
must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your
system.

I do not have a Firefox process running, and restarting the system
(which is not something I generally like doing just to get an app
to start) has no effect. The only FreeBSD-related message about this
that I found talks about deleting lock files in ~/.mozilla, but I
don't have any Firefox lock files. There was a Solaris-related 
discussion of this that advised upgrading, but I'm up to date with
Firefox (running 1.5.0.1,1).

I'm using FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #3.

Any suggestions? Mozilla runs fine, but I had finally made the shift
to Firefox.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sound card getting blocked somehow

2006-02-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

My soundcard seems to be blocked somehow, and I'm not sure how
this happened or what to do about it. I don't believe I did
anything specific, but sound simply stopped working; if I
start up xmms (for example) I get a console message **
WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device
(/dev/dsp): No such file or directory, and a popup window
reading Couldn't open audio: Please check that: Your
soundcard is configured properly/You have the correct output
plugin selected/No other program is blocking the soundcard.

I know that the card is configured and the right output plugin
is selected (I don't get sound with any other apps either),
and I don't have anything else running that uses sound, and in
any case lsof shows that nothing is using /dev/dsp.

Rebooting fixes it, but it then happens again, with no obvious
trigger.

In my most recent attempt to fix things I managed to delete
/dev/dsp entirely (I get the oss_open message regardless),
and don't know how to recreate it.

I'm running 6.0-STABLE #3; here's my /dev/sndstat:

-
$ cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm)
Installed devices:
pcm0: Intel ICH3 (82801CA) at io 0x1c00, 0x18c0 irq 11 bufsz 16384 kld 
snd_ich (1p/1r/4v channels duplex default)
-

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firefox is already running problem on 6.0

2006-02-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:15:43AM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 When I try to launch Firefox, I get a message reading Firefox is
 already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you
 must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your
 system.
 
 You've probably got a stale lockfile. Search for *lock*

As I said in my original message, The only FreeBSD-related
message about this that I found talks about deleting lock
files in ~/.mozilla, but I don't have any Firefox lock files.
I don't have any Mozilla lock files either, for that matter.

Jesse Sheidlower

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firefox is already running problem on 6.0

2006-02-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:47:36PM -0600, Jacob S wrote:
 
 On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:26:18 -0500
 Jesse Sheidlower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  As I said in my original message, The only FreeBSD-related
  message about this that I found talks about deleting lock
  files in ~/.mozilla, but I don't have any Firefox lock files.
  I don't have any Mozilla lock files either, for that matter.
 
 It would help if you could show us how you know, rather than simply
 stating that you know. Did you run the find command looking for lock
 files? If yes, please copy/paste the exact command you used. Also, have
 you run a ps ax | grep firefox, looking for rogue firefox processes
 that didn't quit properly?

To respond to this and the two related messages, I know because I
both manually descended into ~/.mozilla and looked at every directory
therein; did a locate (with a fresh database); and ran:

$ find .mozilla -print | grep -i lock
$

Also,

$ ps -aux | grep fire
$

And

$ lsof | grep fire
bash  59914 jester  cwd   VDIR   0,84512 1530891 
/usr/home/jester/.mozilla/firefox
bash  90239 jester  cwd   VDIR   0,84512 1530891 
/usr/home/jester/.mozilla/firefox
$

I confess to not knowing exactly what the last means; I don't
have any terminals open at ~/.mozilla/firefox, and if those
first numbers are PIDs they don't correspond to any running
processes.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firefox is already running problem on 6.0

2006-02-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:49:41PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
 
 Jesse Sheidlower writes:
   $ lsof | grep fire
   bash  59914 jester  cwd   VDIR   0,84512 1530891 
  /usr/home/jester/.mozilla/firefox
   bash  90239 jester  cwd   VDIR   0,84512 1530891 
  /usr/home/jester/.mozilla/firefox
   $
   
   I confess to not knowing exactly what the last means; I don't
   have any terminals open at ~/.mozilla/firefox, and if those
   first numbers are PIDs they don't correspond to any running
   processes.
 
   So what happens if root does:
 
   $ kill -KILL 59914 90239

Then two shell windows, that had previously been in that
directory, vanish, and lsof | grep fire shows nothing.

However, it doesn't change my inability to launch Firefox,
I'm afraid.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firefox is already running problem on 6.0

2006-02-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:45:10AM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
 As I said in my original message, The only FreeBSD-related
 message about this that I found talks about deleting lock
 files in ~/.mozilla, but I don't have any Firefox lock files.
 I don't have any Mozilla lock files either, for that matter.
 
 Jesse Sheidlower
 
 How about
 http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use

OK, I went through most of the things in that list, and finally
creating a new profile was the only thing that fixed it.

But it is fixed!

Thank you very much. I did look through Mozilla sites but didn't
manage to find this document.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fwd: Adjusting volume with GUI app for USB audio?

2006-01-11 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

(Forwarded from freebsd-multimedia, where no one replied. Is
that list meant only for hard-core development work, or am I
asking badly? I can provide any system details necessary.)

- Forwarded message from Jesse Sheidlower [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

After assorted work, I've gotten USB audio to work on my
computers (FreeBSD 6.0 and 5.4); I select the USB speakers
with sysctl hw.snd.unit=1 to get the pcm1 device.

I find that _some_ graphical volume-control utilities don't
work with the USB speakers. These include the GNOME
volume-control applet, the volume slider in xmms, and the
GNOME volume control application (not the applet). However,
some _do_ work, including the volume control in gmplayer and
the volume control in Rhythmbox. Furthermore, the commandline
mixer(8) works fine--with the speakers plugged in and
selected, mixer reports on bass, treble, and speaker volume,
and I can adjust the volume with mixer speaker 60 or
whatever.

However (again), adjusting the output source in those apps that
allow it has no effect--in the GNOME volume-control applet, for
example, I only have the device choice of OSS Mixer, and 
whether I select Volume, PCM, Speaker, or anything else,
this just won't control the speaker volume.

Any suggestions? It's not the end of the world to use mixer(8)
but it's often inconvenient.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower

- End forwarded message -
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Can't build mplayer-skins: checksum missing error

2006-01-04 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to build mplayer-skins as part of an upgrade of GNOME.
I am unable to get around a weird error with a supposedly missing
checksum in mplayer. After I choose my options (the default skin
only), I get:

=== Options unchanged
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== Extracting for mplayer-skins-1.1.2_1
= No MD5 checksum recorded for mplayer/.
= No suitable checksum found for mplayer/.
*** Error code 1

In multimedia/mplayer/distinfo I do have what appears to be MD5 and
SHA256 checksums. I have cvsupped my ports tree, distcleaned both
the mplayer and the mplayer-skins ports, and removed and rebuilt
mplayer, all with no effect.

What else can I try? And, if there answer is nothing, is there
anything I can do so that I can get on with the rest of my GNOME
upgrade and come back to this later?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Can't build mplayer-skins: checksum missing error

2006-01-04 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:15:46PM -0500, Chris Hill wrote:
 On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 I'm trying to build mplayer-skins as part of an upgrade of GNOME.
 I am unable to get around a weird error with a supposedly missing
 checksum in mplayer. After I choose my options (the default skin
 only), I get:
 
 === Options unchanged
 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
 === Extracting for mplayer-skins-1.1.2_1
 = No MD5 checksum recorded for mplayer/.
 = No suitable checksum found for mplayer/.
 *** Error code 1
 
 In multimedia/mplayer/distinfo I do have what appears to be MD5 and
 SHA256 checksums. I have cvsupped my ports tree, distcleaned both
 the mplayer and the mplayer-skins ports, and removed and rebuilt
 mplayer, all with no effect.
 
 What else can I try?
 
 You could try make -DNO_CHECKSUM install. Probably not a bad idea 
 anyway, for this particular port.

I did try this, and it didn't work. I also do not have GREP_OPTIONS
defined, as another poster asked.

I ended up just installing the package, which worked, though
it required a download of 12MB worth of stuff I don't use.

I wish it were possible to just ship mplayer with the default
skin only, and leave the others in the mplayer-skins port; I
always have problems with this port and I never use anything
but the default.  But that's another issue.

Jesse Sheidlower

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hard lockup with USB speakers after an hour

2005-12-28 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to diagnose and fix a problem I'm having with my
USB audio. After some difficulty getting things set up, I had
managed to understand what I needed to do to get everything
working. Now, when I listen to USB speakers, everything will
work fine for an hour or so, and then I'll get a freeze so
total that I can only fix it by pulling the power cord and
battery out of my laptop. There doesn't seem to be anything
specific that triggers this (it's not caused by adjusting the
volume, or switching back to a different output device, it
just happens in the middle of audio being played). There's
nothing logged in /var/log/messages.

What can I do to further diagnose this, and fix it? I'm
running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE on an IBM ThinkPad X23; the
speakers attach at pcm1.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


automake19: texinfo error during build

2005-12-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to upgrade my automake from 1.8.5_2 to 1.9.6 (in
order to install Subversion, which seems to require
this). During the build, I get a screenful of errors like

./automake19.texi:8788: Unknown command `tie'.
./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced {.
./automake19.texi:8788: Misplaced }.
./automake19.texi:9090: Unknown command `tie'.
[...]

before dying with

---
makeinfo: Removing output file `./automake19.info' due to errors; use --force 
to preserve.
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6/doc.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19/work/automake-1.9.6.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake19.
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade39976.0 
make
** Fix the problem and try again.
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! devel/automake19 (automake-1.8.5_2)   (texinfo error)
---

I think my dependencies are up to date. Oh, this is on 4.X.  I
didn't see anything relevant from Googling. What do I need to
fix to get this in order?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FireFox not starting in 6.0

2005-12-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:33:36PM -0800, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
 
 i finally am getting started with 6.0, after a lot of
 time of installation. Most things are going well but
 the wierdest problem:
 i cant get FireFox to start! It built fine, no errors,
 but it just doesnt start.
 
 There arent really anymore details i can give. It
 doesnt matter if I click the FF icon in Gnome, or type
 'firefox' on the commandline.
 (There's no output from doing that:
 
 $ firefox
 $ 

The same thing happens with mozilla. Apparently you have to
run it as root, and then it works fine--is anyone else seeing
this behavior? The /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox script etc. has
execute perms for any user. What's the tweak that needs to be
done so that a normal user can run it? I didn't see anything
in the package message.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Playing through USB speakers in 6.0

2005-12-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
Last week I sent the following message:

On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:55:44PM -0500, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 I'm running FreeBSD 4.11 on a laptop, and am interested in
 plugging in USB speakers. Is this possible, and if so, what
 do I have to do? There wasn't anything in the Handbook,
 and most things I saw from searching the lists had to do 
 with recording audio to a USB device.

Since then I upgraded to 6.0, and took the chance of buying
a pair of USB speakers, which do not work. My USB works, and
the speakers are drawing a current when plugged in, but I do
not get any music through them. (Audio in general works fine;
I can get sound of out the built-in speakers or through 
headphones and so forth, but I want to use USB speakers to
avoid batteries or a separate power cord.)

I've googled further but still not found anything helpful.
Is there anything I can do to get these to work?

Thanks for any suggestions.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FireFox not starting in 6.0

2005-12-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 09:03:09PM +0100, Werther Pirani wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 i cant get FireFox to start! It built fine, no errors,
 but it just doesnt start.
 
 (There's no output from doing that:
 
 $ firefox
 
 The same thing happens with mozilla. Apparently you have to
 run it as root, and then it works fine--is anyone else seeing
 this behavior?
 
 Just out of curiosity: are the permissions on ~/.mozilla okay?
 
 It's weird but, for some reason, I had mine changed from 700 to 600 and 
 experienced exactly the same behaviour.

How odd--yes, it wasn't exactly the permissions but the ownership was
root instead of the ordinary user. When I chowned it to myself both
programs work fine.

Thanks for the suggestion. I wonder why more people aren't experiencing
this.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


DHCP failing with WiFi after 6.0 upgrade

2005-12-01 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I recently took my IBM ThinkPad X23, which had been running 4.11, and
did a fresh install (backup files, wipe disk, install from scratch)
to 6.0. Most things have gone smoothly, though there are still a few
things to iron out.

My biggest problem is that I can't seem to get DHCP to work with my
wireless card. I have an Orinoco Gold 802.11b card that's always worked
fine; I'm about to replace it with something else for 802.11g with a
new WAP.

There seem to be minor differences in how the card goes in; under 4.11
I would get various beeps when I plugged it in and after it associated,
but now it's silent. And I had to remember to load WEP in my kernel.
But I can seem to get things started by issuing the command

  ifconfig wi0 ssid jesterWAP wepmode on wepkey 0x[DELETED]

which does seem to successfully reach my WAP:

  # ifconfig wi0
  wi0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::202:[DELETED] prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
ether 00:02:[DELETED]
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (DS/2Mbps)
status: associated
ssid jesterWAP channel 6 bssid 00:[DELETED]
stationname FreeBSD WaveLAN/IEEE node
authmode OPEN privacy MIXED deftxkey UNDEF wepkey 1:104-bit txpowmax 
100 bintval 100

I can't seem to get a DHCP lease, however:

  # dhclient wi0
  DHCPDISCOVER on wi0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5
  DHCPDISCOVER on wi0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 13
  DHCPDISCOVER on wi0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7
  DHCPDISCOVER on wi0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
  DHCPDISCOVER on wi0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 13
  DHCPDISCOVER on wi0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 15
  No DHCPOFFERS received.
  No working leases in persistent database - sleeping.

(Under 4.11, I didn't get any verbose output from dhcpclient.)

I can get a DHCP lease with fxp0, my Ethernet card; also, some 
Macs in the house have no problem getting leases through the
WAP. (The DHCP server is in a separate router, not in the WAP.)

Is there something that's changed under 6.0, or is there just
something I'm forgetting to do? I do plan to get a new card,
but I want to get this working too.

Thanks. I thought this was more appropriate here than on -mobile.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


USB audio in 4.11?

2005-11-26 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running FreeBSD 4.11 on a laptop, and am interested in
plugging in USB speakers. Is this possible, and if so, what
do I have to do? There wasn't anything in the Handbook,
and most things I saw from searching the lists had to do 
with recording audio to a USB device.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Scripting the lock-screen function in xscreensaver?

2004-11-10 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running xscreensaver as part of Gnome, and would like to be able
to control it in a way I can't figure out.

Most panel icons can right-click to a properties window that gives,
among other things, the command that will be executed by clicking on
that icon. The lock icon does not have this; the properties window
just controls the aspects of the display, the timing of the blanking,
etc.

I'd like to change the action of this icon so that, before locking
the screen, it executes (for example) ssh-add -D to clear all of
my ssh-agent's identities.

Similarly, I'd like to know the command for locking so that I can put
it elsewhere; for example, into an rc.suspend file, so that if I
close my laptop's cover it will automatically lock the screen.

This at least I would have expected to find in the man page, but 
perhaps I missed it.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Wireless problems after upgrade to 4.10

2004-10-28 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running FreeBSD on an IBM ThinkPad X23. For wireless access, I've
been using an Orinoco Gold 802.11b card that's been working fine for
two years or so.

I just got around to upgrading from 4.9 to 4.10, and in the process
something seems to have gotten screwed up with my wireless networking.
I've made buildworld and made kernel, but not installworld or
mergemaster yet.

On boot, I get something like this from ifconfig:

---
wi0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255
ether [editorially deleted]
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (DS/2Mbps)
status: associated
ssid linksys 1:
stationname FreeBSD WaveLAN/IEEE node
channel 6 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100
wepmode OFF weptxkey 1
---

When I run dhclient, I get an IP address from my Linksys
router, but am unable to reach anything outside. I can
successfully ping the router, but trying to hit any outside
address, by name or IP, just hangs indefinitely. My usual
array of troubleshooting tips--killing the dhclient process,
deleting the dhclient.leases file, flushing the routing
table--has no effect.

Rolling back the kernel fixes this up. There wasn't anything about
this in UPDATING. I can get on perfectly well by plugging in an
Ethernet cable to the same router.

Any suggestions? 

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problems installing Subversion

2004-10-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to install Subversion on a computer running FreeBSD 4.9,
with a fully updated Ports tree. There seems to be some kind of
apr-related problem, though it's not clear why.

When I first ran portinstall, it installed apr itself, and everything
ran smoothly with that install, but when it returned to Subversion
I got

---
===   Returning to build of subversion-1.0.8
===  Configuring for subversion-1.0.8

You select to use`devel/apr' for apr library.
It seems that `devel/apr' is not properly installed.

*** Error code 1
---

I checked, and apr does seem to be installed (with the package
apparently called apr-nothr-gdbm-db4-1.0.0), but trying to re-run
the Subversion install dies in the same way.

What's going on? The only thing in UPDATING is talking about
installing Subversion with Apache2, which I am not doing; I
couldn't find anything relevant on the mailing lists.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems installing Subversion

2004-10-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:04:33PM -0400, Haulmark, Chris wrote:
 Someone broke the silence: 
 
  I'm trying to install Subversion on a computer running FreeBSD 4.9,
  with a fully updated Ports tree. There seems to be some kind of
  apr-related problem, though it's not clear why.
 
 Check in the freebsd-ports mailing list archive.  There's a few days old
 thread regarding this including a patch to update your version to
 subversion 1.1.0.
 
 I would just do a cvsup to see if Subversion has been updated or not.
 If not, use the patch.

Ah. Thanks very much; I didn't look at freebsd-ports. You're right,
it's much discussed, but not yet updated, and the patch worked fine.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
 In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of
 crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the 
 newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.

Sorry for the me too post, but since people are reporting
different results: I have two main computers, one running
4.10 and one running 5.2-CURRENT, but with otherwise
similar setups. GNOME in both cases.

The CURRENT machine is fine; I'm pretty sure I've never had a
crash in several months of operation. The 4.10 machine is
similar to the OP's report: I get relatively frequent but
unpredictable crashes on complex Web pages, with both
Mozilla and Firefox.

It's annoying, and I'd love to know causes and solutions!

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Conflict with p5-podlators

2004-08-07 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

In the past few days, it seems that the p5-podlators port
has been changed in a way that it doesn't install because
it conflicts with perl-5.8.5--you get one of those Can't
be installed because both are installed in the same place
messages.

It doesn't make much sense that a bunch of basic Perl
modules would conflict with Perl itself, and now I 
can't install or upgrade any of the many dependencies
of p5-podlators.

Anyone know what's up with this?

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


libXRes.so.0 and xorg updating

2004-06-28 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

Inspired by all the talk of upgrading to the xorg libraries, I tried
to do this this afternoon. Most things seem to be working OK, but
I seem to be hung up in one spot.

When I restarted X after the update, I got a bunch of errors about
Gnome panel apps, and the panel does not appear. I tried to 
portupgrade -f gnomepanel, and this eventually dies with a

  /usr/bin/ld: warning: libXRes.so.0, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libwnck-1.so, not found 
(try using -rpath or -rpath-link)

error. I tried portinstalling libXres, but this (and its
dependencies) conflicts with xorg-libraries, so I pulled it
again. I have run pkgdb, so gnomepanel should be looking
at xorg-libraries.

Any ideas of where to go from here?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: libXRes.so.0 and xorg updating

2004-06-28 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 03:59:58PM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 Inspired by all the talk of upgrading to the xorg libraries, I tried
 to do this this afternoon. Most things seem to be working OK, but
 I seem to be hung up in one spot.
 
 When I restarted X after the update, I got a bunch of errors about
 Gnome panel apps, and the panel does not appear. I tried to 
 portupgrade -f gnomepanel, and this eventually dies with a
 
   /usr/bin/ld: warning: libXRes.so.0, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libwnck-1.so, not 
 found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
 
 error.

I'm sorry for asking this question without first trying to
portupgrade libwnck, which did the trick immediately.
Luckily I seem to have caught this before anyone responded...

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problem with xscreensaver-gnome port

2004-05-26 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I recently tried to update my xscreensaver-gnome port from 
4.15_2 to 4.16. After the usual amount of churning, it
died with the following error:

---
In file included from phosphor.c:34:
/usr/local/include/util.h:95: error: syntax error before '/' token
In file included from phosphor.c:34:
/usr/local/include/util.h:21:1: unterminated #ifndef
phosphor.c:33:1: unterminated #ifdef
phosphor.c:29:1: unterminated #ifdef
gmake[1]: *** [phosphor.o] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory 
`/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome/work/xscreensaver-4.16/hacks'
gmake: *** [all] Error 5
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome.
---

Then I got a notice about the upgrade dying with a C++ error,
which for some reason I didn't save.

Any ideas? I couldn't find anything in a quick search, and
it's holding up the builds of other Gnome ports. I'm using
FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT, but I'd think that an error like this is
one that would be likely to show up pretty readily.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: USB via module instead of kernel?

2004-04-13 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:34:13PM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 I'm new to this kernel-module thing, so I hope this isn't
 a silly question.
 
 I'm using FreeBSD 5.2 on a laptop running ACPI, and like
 many others have had suspend/resume problems with the 
 USB dying on resume. I saw a suggestion somewhere that
 you could remove USB support from the kernel, and add it
 in via a .ko file at boot time; this way, you could have
 an rc.suspend and rc.resume that unloads/loads the USB
 module appropriately and perhaps avoid the problems.
 
 I'm not entirely sure how to do this. First, I note
 that the device usb line in the kernel configuration
 file has a Required note in it, and I'm nervous about
 removing something that says Required.
 
 Second, while I have a usb.ko file under /boot/kernel/, if I
 type kldload usb, I get a can't load usb: File exists
 message, but if I try kldunload usb, I get can't find file
 usb: No such file or directory. I might have expected a
 different message if usb is loaded as part of the kernel. If I
 want to enable it at boot, do I just add usb_load=YES to
 /boot/loader.conf ?
 
 So to summarize, I guess my questions are:
 
 1) Can I comment out device usb from my kernel config and
 then rebuild the kernel, without causing some big problem?

Responding to myself, the answer is no; removing device
usb from the kernel config causes errors at make, so
I had to go back.

I still can't seem to load or unload usb as a module. Any
suggestions welcome.

Jesse Sheidlower

 2) To load at boot, do I just add usb_load=YES to
 /boot/loader.conf ?
 
 3) Will doing what I described help with the USB problems
 on suspend/resume?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


USB via module instead of kernel?

2004-04-12 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm new to this kernel-module thing, so I hope this isn't
a silly question.

I'm using FreeBSD 5.2 on a laptop running ACPI, and like
many others have had suspend/resume problems with the 
USB dying on resume. I saw a suggestion somewhere that
you could remove USB support from the kernel, and add it
in via a .ko file at boot time; this way, you could have
an rc.suspend and rc.resume that unloads/loads the USB
module appropriately and perhaps avoid the problems.

I'm not entirely sure how to do this. First, I note
that the device usb line in the kernel configuration
file has a Required note in it, and I'm nervous about
removing something that says Required.

Second, while I have a usb.ko file under /boot/kernel/, if I
type kldload usb, I get a can't load usb: File exists
message, but if I try kldunload usb, I get can't find file
usb: No such file or directory. I might have expected a
different message if usb is loaded as part of the kernel. If I
want to enable it at boot, do I just add usb_load=YES to
/boot/loader.conf ?

So to summarize, I guess my questions are:

1) Can I comment out device usb from my kernel config and
then rebuild the kernel, without causing some big problem?

2) To load at boot, do I just add usb_load=YES to
/boot/loader.conf ?

3) Will doing what I described help with the USB problems
on suspend/resume?

Thanks very much.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.6 released!

2004-04-07 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 05:40:56PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
 On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 00:13, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  
  I'm running XFree86 4.4, which I installed from binaries on
  the XFree86 site. This is working fine for me, except that I
  often have to skip portinstall and use make install from the
  relevant directory, because of all the dependencies on 4.3
  versions of things. (Using -O to force never seems to work;
  it'll build but then hang on the Uninstalling the old version
  stage.)
[...]
  Is there any way I can upgrade to GNOME 2.6, or do I have to
  wait until XFree86 4.4 makes it into Ports, whenever that is?
 
 You'll have to do it manually, but you're most likely going to run into
 problems.  One thought might be to install the ports version of X, then
 upgrade GNOME, then reinstall XF86 4.4.

Thanks! A variant of that did the trick, namely to delete the 4.4 
install, portinstall the Server-snap version, do the GNOME update,
and realize that my needed driver is provided in 4.3.99, and I'm 
good to go.

I am, however, having a problem with the login session. When I
try to log in, I instantly get an error message with Your 
session only lasted less than 10 seconds; I can use the Failsafe
GNOME session without a problem, and .xsession-errors tells me
that 

  /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libutil.so.3 not found

I do have libutil.so.4 installed; is there some different package
I need that provides 3? I did reinstall gnomesession, but the
result was the same.

Thanks! I googled for this but no one else seems to have reported
the problem.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.6 released!

2004-04-07 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 08:49:06PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
 On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 19:36, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  
  I am, however, having a problem with the login session. When I
  try to log in, I instantly get an error message with Your 
  session only lasted less than 10 seconds; I can use the Failsafe
  GNOME session without a problem, and .xsession-errors tells me
  that 
  
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libutil.so.3 not found
  
  I do have libutil.so.4 installed; is there some different package
  I need that provides 3? I did reinstall gnomesession, but the
  result was the same.
 
 Looks like you installed an out-of-date package.  You'll have to use ldd
 to find the binary linked to libutil.so.3, use pkg_info -W to find out
 which port installs it, then rebuild that port.

Thanks. In the meantime I had discovered that it was sessreg
causing the problem, but sessreg wasn't associated with any of
my installed packages (it must have come from my previous
binary install of 4.4, which I thought I had
deleted). Reinstalling XFree86-4-Server-snap did not help, so
I poked around a little more, installed XFree86-4-clients
(which I had previously got along without), and now I seem to
be all set.

I hope this doesn't create problems in the future, but since for now
my package database is happy and X works, so I guess it's OK.

Thank you for your help.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.6 released!

2004-04-05 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:00:48AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
 The FreeBSD GNOME Team is delighted to announce the release of the GNOME
 2.6 Desktop and Developer suites for FreeBSD.  Accompanying this release
 are the usual meta-port bumps for the GNOME Fifth Toe, Power Tools,
 Hacker Tools, and Office.

Congratulations! And thanks for all the work.

I'm running XFree86 4.4, which I installed from binaries on
the XFree86 site. This is working fine for me, except that I
often have to skip portinstall and use make install from the
relevant directory, because of all the dependencies on 4.3
versions of things. (Using -O to force never seems to work;
it'll build but then hang on the Uninstalling the old version
stage.)

Needless to say, running the gnome_upgrade.sh script fails all
over the place on these dependency issues. And I see the strong
warning against upgrading in other manners.

Is there any way I can upgrade to GNOME 2.6, or do I have to
wait until XFree86 4.4 makes it into Ports, whenever that is?

Thanks again.

Jesse Sheidlower

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Upgrading Perl within 5.2

2004-04-02 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm sure this is a silly question, but. I know about use.perl and
so forth for the 4.x series.

Yesterday I installed FreeBSD 5.2.1, and the active Perl port
is /usr/ports/lang/perl, which is v. 5.6.1. I'd like to upgrade
to 5.8.2, which is in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 and thus I can't
just do portupgrade perl.

Exactly what do I have to do to accomplish this? portinstall
perl5.8 doesn't work (No such installed package nor such port...),
nor does portinstall perl-5.8.2_2 (which is said to be the
package name in the README file). The PORTNAME given in the 5.8
Makefile is just perl.

I assume I could just do a make install from the perl5.8 
directory, but how do I do it with portupgrade? And then how
do I get rid of the 5.6 version and rebuild things with 5.8?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


X config problems on T41p

2004-04-02 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1 on a ThinkPad T41p. I'm using XFree86
4.4.0, installed from the binaries on the XFree site (the video
card, an ATI Radeon FireGL T2, was apparently not supported with
the radeon driver shipped with 4.3).

Initially, X was working fine, with no config file at all, yet
I've run into problems trying to use a config file. I generated
one with XFree86 -configure, but this set the driver to ati,
instead of to radeon which seems from its docs to be the one
supporting my card. In any case, whether with the driver as ati
or as radeon, the trackpoint doesn't function at all, nor does
the touchpad (which I disabled in the BIOS anyway, as some Web
pages said this was necessary to use the third button and I
don't like the touchpad anyway). Everything else seems to be
OK but I can't get anywhere without any pointer.

The InputDevice section maps the Device as /dev/sysmouse, 
which I thought is correct; there's no /dev/mouse.

The several Web pages about FreeBSD on a T40 or T41 don't
say anything helpful; this doesn't seem to be a problem
for these users (the T41 guy did say that no config file
was needed, but my problem is I _want_ to use one to set
other details).

Thanks for any suggestions.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


dev issues (was: Re: X config problems on T41p)

2004-04-02 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:51:23PM -0500, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1 on a ThinkPad T41p. I'm using XFree86
 4.4.0, installed from the binaries on the XFree site (the video
 card, an ATI Radeon FireGL T2, was apparently not supported with
 the radeon driver shipped with 4.3).
 
 Initially, X was working fine, with no config file at all, yet
 I've run into problems trying to use a config file. I generated
 one with XFree86 -configure, but this set the driver to ati,
 instead of to radeon which seems from its docs to be the one
 supporting my card. In any case, whether with the driver as ati
 or as radeon, the trackpoint doesn't function at all, nor does
 the touchpad (which I disabled in the BIOS anyway, as some Web
 pages said this was necessary to use the third button and I
 don't like the touchpad anyway). Everything else seems to be
 OK but I can't get anywhere without any pointer.
 
 The InputDevice section maps the Device as /dev/sysmouse, 
 which I thought is correct; there's no /dev/mouse.

Following up to myself: I looked at the X logs when I booted
with no config file, and learned that it probed the trackpoint
as /dev/psm0, so when I stuck this into the InputDevice section
for Device, it worked fine. Yay!

However, I now have a problem with my usb mouse, which I'm
sure is the result of my ignorance of how the /dev system
works.  I plug in a usb mouse, and I get a kernel message
identifying it as ums0, 3 buttons and Z dir (so clearly it
knows it's a mouse and some USB thing is working). At the same
time, it reports

  moused: unable to open /dev/ums0: no such file or directory.

What do I need to get this working, and will I need to add
this to the X config file as well?

I do find it a little odd in that in my other FreeBSD
laptop (4.9), I use /dev/mouse in my X config, and both
the trackpoint, and any USB mouse I plug in, work fine
with no effort on my part.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


XFree86 4.4 in FreeBSD?

2004-03-30 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm about to install FreeBSD on a new computer, and was
looking over the release notes for XFree86 in preparation and
discovered that the Current release is 4.4. Though I don't
think I actively need any of the features of version 4.4, I do
wonder why it hasn't made it into the Ports system yet.  It's
been out for a month, and there are FreeBSD binaries on the
XFree86 site.

There doesn't seem to have been much discussion of it here. Are
there any specific problems with 4.4, or is it just a big job
to port it and deal with dependencies?

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: XFree86 4.4 in FreeBSD?

2004-03-30 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 06:03:19PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 08:59:42PM -0500, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  
  I'm about to install FreeBSD on a new computer, and was
  looking over the release notes for XFree86 in preparation and
  discovered that the Current release is 4.4. Though I don't
  think I actively need any of the features of version 4.4, I do
  wonder why it hasn't made it into the Ports system yet.  It's
  been out for a month, and there are FreeBSD binaries on the
  XFree86 site.
  
  There doesn't seem to have been much discussion of it here. Are
  there any specific problems with 4.4, or is it just a big job
  to port it and deal with dependencies?
 
 The latter.

Hmm. This is distressing, as I've discovered since posting my
original message not long ago that my video card (ATI Mobility
FireGL T2) is not supported in 4.3, but is supported in 4.4.

How grim a job is it going to be to handle the X setup manually,
and how badly will I get screwed every time I try to install a
new X-based app?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Setting up X for external monitor(s)

2004-02-12 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I have XFree86 4.3 running on an IBM ThinkPad X23 laptop; the
screen has a maximum resolution of 1024x768. If I plug in an
external monitor with a larger screen, and then hit F7 to get
the monitor on, it will still show up as 1024x768, just
larger.

What sections do I need to set up in my XF86Config-4 file to
enable different resolutions for an external monitor? I'm not
clear on the differences between Section Monitor and the
Section Screen (where resolutions appear to be set). And
specifically, how do I then switch from monitor to monitor, so
that I'm using a particular one for the external monitor, with
bigger resolution, and a different one for the laptop screen,
with a smaller resolution (i.e. something like hit F7)? What
if I had the possibility of several different external
monitors, with different resolutions?

I'm using Gnome2 if that matters, on FreeBSD 4.8. The computer
uses the ATI Radeon Mobility card.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


SANE setup with 4.8 and Canon LiDE30

2004-02-04 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to get my FreeBSD 4.8 system working with a Canon
LiDE30 scanner, using SANE. I've installed everything required,
and read the man pages, but still can't seem to get off the ground. 

Running sane-find-scanner only works as root, even with chmod 666
/dev/ugen0* . It returns:

found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x220e) at libusb:dev/usb0:dev/ugen0

However, scanimage -L doesn't find anything, as root or not. Following
some manpage suggestions, I tried specifying the vendor and product ids
in the config file for the plustek backend, but this had no effect.

Any suggestions for what to try next?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mozilla: changing IP w/o restarting

2004-01-20 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:01:35AM -0500, Dan Pelleg wrote:
 
 If this is related to the problem that made mozilla hang for a few seconds
 on some lookups (ISTR it being related to missing  records), it has
 been fixed a while ago (at least in firebird). The OP didn't specify the
 mozilla version he's using

I'm using Mozilla 1.5. I haven't had any problems with short hangs,
FWIW.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mozilla: changing IP w/o restarting

2004-01-19 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

This may be offtopic, but my FreeBSD laptop is the only one
I can test this on, so apologies if it is OT.

I use Mozilla on my 4.8 laptop. Whenever I switch IP addresses,
which is frequent, as I use my computer both in the office and
at home (and on trips, etc.), Mozilla becomes unable to 
resolve any sites it hasn't previously hit. I just get an
endless, Resolving host www.nytimes.com note in the corner.

The only way around this is to quit and restart the browser.
Frankly, this is a pain in the ass, as I usually have six
or more tabs open at once, each containing something I need,
and I don't want to re-open everything every time I move the
computer.

Is there any way around this? I didn't see anything obvious
in the Mozilla docs. 

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mapping keys to various functions...

2003-12-30 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 07:08:41PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 I can't find the program someone listed in here about 6 months ago about a 
 program for X that tells you the key code when you press a key on the 
 keyboard.  I have a laptop that I would like to map extra buttons to, like 
 volume up/down, and those funky email,search,internet buttons, etc.

man xev

Best,

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Screensaver issue

2003-12-27 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I recently spent some time with portupgrade, fixing a bunch of
messed-up dependencies and ensuring that my GNOME was fully
updated to 2.4. When I was done, most things were pretty much
the same, but now my screen turns off after about five minutes
or so. This is not apparently related to xscreensaver, which 
is set not to go on until 30 minutes pass.

Are there other screensavers that might be running, or some
other explanation for the screen turning off after such a short
time? Any mouse movement or keyboard touch turns it on again.

I'm running 4.8-STABLE on an IBM ThinkPad X series, if it matters.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading self-installed X with Ports version?

2003-10-19 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:16:50PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
  I recently tried to upgrade X by installing it from Ports,
  and thought I had succeeded, as pkg_info and so forth are
  reporting that XFree86-4.3.0,1 is installed. However, I'm
  still running 4.2, as executing XFree86 -version informs
  me. 
 
 First the D'Oh! question: you did restart the X server after
 installing the upgrade didn't you? Pressing Ctrl-Alt-Esc will kill
 your current X server, and depending on your setup, may cause another
 server instance to start up automatically.  Or it may need you to run
 startx(1) again.

Yes, I did; that was an early first worry. In fact I rebooted
the machine entirely.

 XFree86 -version will tell you the version of the XFree86-Server port.
 The straight XFree86-4.3.0,1 port doesn't actually install very much
 itself:
 
 % pkg_info -L XFree86-4.3.0,1 
 Information for XFree86-4.3.0,1:
 
 Files:
 
 as it only exists to cause the other required XFree86 ports to be
 installed as dependencies of it:
 
 % pkg_info -r XFree86-4.3.0,1
 Information for XFree86-4.3.0,1:
 
 Depends on:
 Dependency: expat-1.95.6_1
 Dependency: png-1.2.5_2
 Dependency: pkgconfig-0.15.0
 Dependency: imake-4.3.0_1
 Dependency: freetype2-2.1.4_1
 Dependency: fontconfig-2.2.90_3
 Dependency: XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6
 Dependency: XFree86-Server-4.3.0_10
 Dependency: Xft-2.1.2
 Dependency: XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0
 Dependency: XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0
 Dependency: XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0
 Dependency: XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0
 Dependency: XFree86-font75dpi-4.3.0
 Dependency: XFree86-font100dpi-4.3.0
 Dependency: XFree86-documents-4.3.0
 Dependency: XFree86-clients-4.3.0_3
 Dependency: wrapper-1.0_3
 Dependency: XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0_2
 
 Essentially you need imake and all of the ports with XFree86 in their
 names to be at version 4.3.0 or better.  portupgrade(1) will ease the
 pain of doing that remarkably.

Right; but that's what I've already done, hence the confusion.
I do have most of these to a current version:

monopoly/etc/X11 $ pkg_info -r XFree86-4.3.0,1
Information for XFree86-4.3.0,1:

Depends on:
Dependency: expat-1.95.5
Dependency: png-1.2.5_2
Dependency: pkgconfig-0.15.0
Dependency: imake-4.3.0_1
Dependency: freetype2-2.1.4_1
Dependency: fontconfig-2.2.0
Dependency: XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_5
Dependency: Xft-2.1_8
Dependency: wrapper-1.0_3
Dependency: XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0
Dependency: XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0
Dependency: XFree86-clients-4.3.0_3

and running portupgrade(1) doesn't do much, as it apparently
thinks I'm all set:

monopoly/etc/X11 # portupgrade XFree86
monopoly/etc/X11 # 

Yet I'm still running 4.2. This is why I'm confused :-/.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Basic printing setup

2003-10-19 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I've never gotten around to setting up printing from
my FreeBSD machine--the discussion in the Handbook is
rather frightening--and now that I've decided I should
probably give it a try, I find that the Handbook doesn't
even let me get started.

I have two situations for this computer (a laptop
running FreeBSD-4.8). I have a home network that
has an older (non-Ethernetted) HP LaserJet 6MP; this
is attached to the network via an AsanteTalk AppleTalk-
Ethernet bridge. The Macs on the network (OSX and 8.6)
can all see the printer. What do I need to do to print
to this printer from my FreeBSD machine when it's on
the network?

In the second case, I just have a desktop printer--
some HP color thing, the 990 I think--that only has a
USB connection. The Handbook doesn't mention USB
printing at all. 

In both cases I'm not looking to do anything fancy,
none of this user-accounting or header-pages stuff.
I just want to be able to send jobs to the printer
and have them come out. I guess I'd also be curious 
how to select one or the other, or more if they were
added to the network. Thanks for any pointers on
how to accomplish this.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ssh problems after unrelated changes

2003-10-06 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm running FreeBSD 4.8. I recently did some assorted work on
my system, upgrading a disk drive and rebuilding (not updating)
my kernel.

Now, I can't seem to ssh from my normal user account. When I try,
I get the error:

monopoly~ $ ssh somedomain.com
ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/X11R6/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or directory
Host key verification failed.
monopoly~ $

I'm not trying to use any kind of graphical connection method, I
just want the usual login. I've tried unsetting $DISPLAY, and re-installing
OpenSSH from Ports, both with no effect. In the process of playing around
I accidentally deleted my .ssh/known_hosts file, but this also has had
no effect. I never had an ssh_config file in the first place.

Oddly, I _can_ ssh normally when sudo'd to root, but I can't see any
obvious reason--I don't have an ssh_config file as root, etc.

Thanks for any suggestions.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Upgrading HD difficulties

2003-09-25 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I have been trying for some time to upgrade the HD in my
FreeBSD 4.8 laptop, attempting many different things but
all with no success.

I don't have a separate enclosure for it, and it being a
laptop I can only put in one drive at a time. My basic plan
has been to back up the current HD to another computer,
install the new HD, boot from the Mini CD, use the Fixit shell
on the CD to mount the new HD, mount the other computer over
NFS, and transfer everything into the newly mounted directory.

Originally I tried with dump, but I kept getting loads of
errors, so I switched to tar. I made one tarfile of /usr
(which is relatively large), and one of everything else.

For example:

# mount_nfs 192.168.1.2:/OtherComputerHD /mnt2

# newfs /dev/ad0s1
# mount /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
# cd /mnt
# tar xf /mnt2/original.tar
# tar xf /mnt2/original-usr.tar

(I actually had to install mount and tar onto the NFS 
filesystem and run them from there; I'm not showing that
here.)

I then rebooted, from the new HD this time, rather than
the CD, and things started to work OK. But eventually I
ran into filesystem problems--sync problems, or other 
things, and I had to run fsck -y manually to fix them. But
though this did clean the filesystem, the stuff that was
there wasn't what I had untar'd into place--it seemed to
be a bare minimun copy of the OS. This has repeated more
than once.

I obviously don't know what I'm doing, but would be very
grateful for any suggestions for how to get this new HD
in. I want it to be exactly the same as the existing one,
but with more room; I'm not trying to do anything fancy
or switch anything around. Especially by this point I'm
willing to do anything to get things working again, as
I really need my computer back!

Thanks for any ideas.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


CUPS vs. apsfilter--newbie setup problems

2003-09-19 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I'm trying to get my 4.8-running laptop hooked up to
some printers, and I'm having trouble getting it configured
with either CUPS or apsfilter (as someone here had recommended).
I've tried to look over the docs, and search through here, but
am still stumped for what I'm supposed to be doing.

I'm also not clear on why these systems don't interoperate, or,
rather, why an entry in /etc/printcap generated from apsfilter
doesn't show up in CUPS. It would be nice if you could use 
these together.

First, I was able to configure printing on a local USB printer
with each system, though apsfilter has a vastly greater number
of drivers available. Is there a way to get CUPS to read these
drivers, or to separately install ones that it can handle?

I'm not able to get either one to work with a networked printer.
With CUPS, I can get it to the point where I can print a test
page, by choosing the device AppSocket/HP Jet Direct (though
it's not a Jet Direct printer, just a regular TCP/IP interface) and
using a device URI of socket://1.2.3.4:9100/ , but I
can't get anything else to print on this printer. I wasn't able
to get it to print even a test page by using any lpd combination
I could come up with.

With apsfilter, I can't get it set up at all; anything I try
gives lpr: unable to print file: client-error-not-found
when I try to do a test page.

Assuming I ever do manage to get this configured, is there a
way to choose printers from within apps? In Mozilla, even with
several (dummy) printers entered, the only option for Printer
is PostScript/Default, and from, say, Emacs, there's just the
various print options. Do I have to choose this from the 
command line outside of the apps?

Thanks very much.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CUPS vs. apsfilter--newbie setup problems

2003-09-19 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:05:50AM -0500, Andrew L. Gould wrote:
 On Friday 19 September 2003 10:39 am, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  I'm trying to get my 4.8-running laptop hooked up to
  some printers, and I'm having trouble getting it configured
  with either CUPS or apsfilter (as someone here had recommended).
  I've tried to look over the docs, and search through here, but
  am still stumped for what I'm supposed to be doing.

[...]

 This may sound like a dumb question, but did you start the printing service 
 'lpd'?  The default installation of FreeBSD does not start this service.

It is not a dumb question, as I normally do forget such things, but
in this case, yes, lpd is running.

Jesse Sheidlower

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Basic printer setup (repost)

2003-09-18 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I sent this yesterday, but it seems not to have gone
through--apologies if it's a duplicate.

I've never gotten around to setting up printing from   
my FreeBSD machine--the discussion in the Handbook is 
rather frightening--and now that I've decided I should
probably give it a try, I find that the Handbook doesn't
even let me get started.

I have two situations for this computer (a laptop
running FreeBSD-4.8). I have a home network that
has an older (non-Ethernetted) HP LaserJet 6MP; this  
is attached to the network via an AsanteTalk AppleTalk-   
Ethernet bridge. The Macs on the network (OSX and 8.6)
can all see the printer. What do I need to do to print
to this printer from my FreeBSD machine when it's on
the network?

In the second case, I just have a desktop printer-- some HP
Deskjet color thing, the 990 I think--that only has a USB
connection. The Handbook doesn't mention USB printing at all.

In both cases I'm not looking to do anything fancy,
none of this user-accounting or header-pages stuff.
I just want to be able to send jobs to the printer
and have them come out. I guess I'd also be curious
how to select one or the other, or more if they were
added to the network. Thanks for any pointers on
how to accomplish this.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Basic printer setup (repost)

2003-09-18 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:23:52AM +, Lee Harr wrote:
 I just want to be able to send jobs to the printer
 and have them come out.
 
 
 
 cd /usr/ports/print/apsfilter/
 make
 make install
 
 cd /usr/local/share/apsfilter/
 ./SETUP

Thanks. In the meantime, I had started to play around with
CUPS, which I got working for my local USB printer pretty
readily, but I couldn't get to handle an AppleTalk printer.
So I gave apsfilter a try, and having problems here too--
I managed to nuke my CUPS setup, and printing a test page
died with nbp_lookup: Protocol not supported, even though
netatalk is installed on the system.

So I'm giving up now and will try again in the morning.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading sshd?

2003-09-16 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
At 07:24 PM 9/16/03 +0300, you wrote:
Hi all,

Refering to the latest sshd vurnability 
(http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/1327248.shtml?tid=126tid=172) I 
was thinking of upgradeing my sshd as well. So I cvsup'ed my system (FBSD 
4.8) and there seems to be a updated file for sshd. But how do I upgrade 
sshd safly since when I type 'pkg_info |grep ssh' it return no packages. I 
guess sshd is included somehow by the default install (??) but how can I 
now upgrade it? I was thinking of portupgrade, but it needs a package to 
upgrade...

There's a FreeBSD Security Advisory out that gives explicit details
on how to implement a fix for OpenSSH running as part of the core
system:

ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-03%3A12.openssh.asc

There seems to be a typo in one line; in the section on restarting sshd

(. /etc/rc.conf  ${sshd_program:-/usr/bin/sshd} ${sshd_flags})
^

should I think be sbin.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Upgrading self-installed X with Ports version?

2003-09-09 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

A year and a half ago I installed FreeBSD on a laptop. I've
entirely forgotten the details, but I had to install XFree86
from scratch because I needed a version that was newer than
whatever was in Ports at the time. (The chip is an ATI
Mobility Radeon; I installed XFree86 4.2.)

I recently tried to upgrade X by installing it from Ports,
and thought I had succeeded, as pkg_info and so forth are
reporting that XFree86-4.3.0,1 is installed. However, I'm
still running 4.2, as executing XFree86 -version informs
me. 

I suppose this is a really stupid question, but what do I 
need to do to get the newer, Ports version of XFree86 to be
the version run on the system? And is there anything I should
be doing to get it configured properly after the change is
made?

Thanks very much.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading self-installed X with Ports version?

2003-09-09 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:44:45PM +0100, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
  I suppose this is a really stupid question, but what do I 
  need to do to get the newer, Ports version of XFree86 to be
  the version run on the system? And is there anything I should
  be doing to get it configured properly after the change is
  made?
 
 It's possible that the start script for XFree86 that the port installs,
 is installed in a directory further down in the PATH variable. This
 means that when you call startx, you're starting the older version, which
 in turn calls the older version of X. 

I considered this, but the current (i.e., wrong) version is as
far down as it could possibly be:


XFree86 Version 4.2.0 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 18 January 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/)
Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE-p1 i386 [ELF] 
Module Loader present
monopoly/etc/X11 # which XFree86
/usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
monopoly/etc/X11 # echo $PATH
/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/jester/bin

Where should the port be installing its version?

 Your best bet is to remove the port entirely, remove the existing X
 server and re-install the port. This way you'll only have one version of
 X on the box. 

Probably another stupid question, but how much do I have to remove
to remove the existing X server? I'm happy to delete the server
files, but don't want to accidentally wipe out other things that
I'll still want.

Thank you.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading self-installed X with Ports version?

2003-09-09 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:49:47PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 Hmmm... I don't see the XFree86-Server port there.  You may have an X
 Server installed, but because the system doesn't recognise it as part
 of an installed port, it isn't attempting to upgrade it.
 
 You can always force the port to reinstall:
 
 # portinstall -fN x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server
 
 Although the ports system is very good at ensuring all of the
 dependencies of a package are met, it does that by checking that key
 executables or shared libraries or whatever are installed, rather than
 checking the database of installed ports.  Also, when you run
 pkgdb(1), it's possible to tell the package database to forget about a
 dependency.  This, although it seems like a golden opportunity for
 foot-shooting, is actually a clever move that allows you to mix
 together 3rd party software installed by hand with software installed
 from the ports system.  Although there's very little reason nowadays
 to go outside ports.

Thanks! This worked perfectly.

Now I just have to fix my lousy config files

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to start gnome?

2003-09-03 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:58:51AM -0700, Ronnie Clark wrote:
 I just loaded Gnome 2.2.2 from ports. Does anyone know
 the command to put into .xinitrc to run gnome2? I
 tried the following:
 exec gnome
 exec gnome2
 
 They do not work. 

To run it from the command line, gdm. To run at boot, as
the docs say:

- Do _NOT_ use /etc/ttys to start gdm at boot time.  This will result in gdm 
  hanging or restarting constantly.  Instead, copy the included gdm.sh.sample 
  script to gdm.sh, and restart.  This script is found, by default, in
  /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d.


HTH.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mozilla display issues, esp. with hover

2003-09-02 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I recently updated my Mozilla install, and since then have 
been having assorted display problems. These don't affect
a similar install on Linux, so I'm imagining they're 
FreeBSD-related; if not, sorry for this OT post.

In particular it seems that sites having particular links
where there's some hover value in the CSS display
strangely: when the page first loads, these links are
displayed in some plain text, then when I run the mouse
over them (without clicking, and this is for non-
JavaScript pages) the links turn to their hover value
during mouseover, and then return to some other value--
but not the plain value--after mouseover.

The typical effect is that links will display in
black, then during mouseover they'll turn into, say,
blue with underlines, and then after mouseover they'll
return to non-underlined blue, which is what they should
have been in the first place. Also, moving up and down
using the scrollbar can have an impact on how these are
rendered.

I've noticed similar (?) problems where text is displayed
in black when it should be in some color/weight variant,
but I haven't noticed a pattern that will allow me to 
discuss it further.

Any ideas about this? I'm using Mozilla 1.4 for GTK-2,
installed from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.8.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OT: xterm setup

2003-09-01 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:51:21AM +0200, Hendrik Hasenbein wrote:
 Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 I recently upgraded my desktop to Gnome2, and of the various things
 that are causing me grief, the biggest is what's happened to my xterm
 windows. Now, after the change, it does three things differently and
 annoyingly: (1) it defaults to black/colored text on a white
 background; (2) it doesn't have a scrollbar of any sort; and (3)
 there's no menubar with basic File/Edit etc. options.
 
 Sounds like the gnome terminal or eterm. The standard xterm doesn't give 
 you a menubar.

Thanks for this and to others who replied. I've been so confused
by this that I dropped by the office to take a look at my Linux
(RH 7.3) box, only to discover that yes, I had been running
gnome-terminal there.

I've looked at the various options and decided that eterm looks
best and is easiest to get to the way I want, so I'm going with
that for now. Thanks for the various suggestions.

Best,

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


OT: xterm setup

2003-08-31 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I recently upgraded my desktop to Gnome2, and of the various things
that are causing me grief, the biggest is what's happened to my
xterm windows. Now, after the change, it does three things
differently and annoyingly: (1) it defaults to black/colored text on
a white background; (2) it doesn't have a scrollbar of any sort; and
(3) there's no menubar with basic File/Edit etc. options.

I can somewhat get around (1) by launching it with xterm -r, 
although while this does display white/colored on black, it also
makes other menus (e.g. those launched with ctrl-[mouse buttons])
look incomplete. But (2) is the worst; I really need to have
scrollbars with this. I see that there's a toggleable option to
Enable Scrollbar that I get to with ctrl-Mouse2, but this isn't
a regular scrollbar that I can click up and down on, with a moveable
thumb, etc., as I used to have before the upgrade and as the 
gnome-terminal has now.

I'd be very grateful for a solution to this.

Is there a mailing list for Gnome questions? I couldn't easily find
one on the Gnome site, and I have various questions not specific to
FreeBSD.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OT: xterm setup

2003-08-31 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:24:41AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
 In the last episode (Aug 31), Jesse Sheidlower said:
  I recently upgraded my desktop to Gnome2, and of the various things
  that are causing me grief, the biggest is what's happened to my xterm
  windows. Now, after the change, it does three things differently and
  annoyingly: (1) it defaults to black/colored text on a white
  background; (2) it doesn't have a scrollbar of any sort; and (3)
  there's no menubar with basic File/Edit etc. options.
  
  I can somewhat get around (1) by launching it with xterm -r,
  although while this does display white/colored on black, it also
  makes other menus (e.g. those launched with ctrl-[mouse buttons])
  look incomplete. But (2) is the worst; I really need to have
  scrollbars with this. I see that there's a toggleable option to
  Enable Scrollbar that I get to with ctrl-Mouse2, but this isn't a
  regular scrollbar that I can click up and down on, with a moveable
  thumb, etc., as I used to have before the upgrade and as the
  gnome-terminal has now.
 
 You must not have been using xterm before, then, since I don't believe
 you can have any scrollbar other than the standard X-style (RMB scrolls
 up, LMB scrolls down) bar, and it does not come with a menubar either.

Hmm. I certainly thought I was using xterm, as I recall setting
up the icon to launch xterm, and my .bashrc is setting TERM
to xterm-color rather than gnome-terminal or anything else.
And I'm rather sure that I have the exact same setup on my
Linux box, which is in the office and thus unavailable for me
to look at right now. It's also the case that the font displaying
with xterm now looks totally familiar, and the one displaying
with gnome-terminal is totally unfamiliar and ugly.

Is it possible that the functional scrollbars, etc., were an addition 
of the window manager, and if so is there any way to replicate it now?

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problem building Gnome2

2003-08-25 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

Sorry to repost this under a different subject line, and also
since it sems there's been a lot of Gnome2 discussion lately,
but

I'm having trouble building Gnome2 from Ports. I keep getting
stuck on the build of scrollkeeper, at a line:

/usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lgiconv

I believe I'm fully up to date with relevant ports; it seems
that lgiconv is related to the libiconv port but I have the
newest version of this. Any suggestions for what to do to get
this built? I had to delete all of Gnome1 to get started, and
it's proving difficult to get much work done with no desktop

Thanks!

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Missing libintl.so.1 for Gnome2 build

2003-08-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

I am trying to build Gnome2 on my system (FreeBSD 4.8), and keep
running into a problem. I'm getting the following error:

=== Building for pkgconfig-0.15.0
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.1 not found

I see from some other archived messages that this has something 
to do with gettext, so I tried deinstalling and reinstalling
this, but no joy. I do have libintl.so and libintl.so.4, both
under /usr/local/lib. The archived messages also didn't allow me
to figure out what I need to do to get through this.

So, what do I need to do to get through this? Would be grateful for
any help, esp. since I had do remove Gnome1 to prep for this build
and am thus without any GUI desktop at the moment.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Missing libintl.so.1 for Gnome2 build

2003-08-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:05:08PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 11:12, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
  I am trying to build Gnome2 on my system (FreeBSD 4.8), and keep
  running into a problem. I'm getting the following error:
  
  === Building for pkgconfig-0.15.0
  /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.1 not found
[...]
 
 This is a problem with gmake.  Rebuild it, and you should be fine.

Thank you! That worked perfectly. 

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


libIDL problem during Gnome2 build

2003-08-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

Oops, another problem during my attempted Gnome2 build, and this
one is even less clear to me. During the build of libIDL, I
get the following error:

=== Bulding for libIDL-0.8.2
bison -y -d -v 2/dev/null ./parser.y
gmake:: *** [stamp-parser] Error 1
*** Error code 2

Any thoughts about what to do about this?

Thank you.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: libIDL problem during Gnome2 build

2003-08-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:03:05PM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
 
 Oops, another problem during my attempted Gnome2 build, and this
 one is even less clear to me. During the build of libIDL, I
 get the following error:
 
 === Bulding for libIDL-0.8.2
 bison -y -d -v 2/dev/null ./parser.y
 gmake:: *** [stamp-parser] Error 1
 *** Error code 2
 
 Any thoughts about what to do about this?

Never mind. I was using an out-of-date version of bison; upgrading
fixed that problem.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


lgiconv and scrollkeeper

2003-08-21 Thread Jesse Sheidlower

In the process of installing Gnome2, I've run into a problem
with a missing library, and unlike the usual case of my just
not looking hard enough, I'm really stuck this time.

When I try to build scrollkeeper, I get stopped at:

/usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lgiconv

and then an array of errors reported by gmake. I'm using
libiconv 1.9.1_1, which seems to be the most current, and
for the hell of it I also installed iconv 2.0_3.

According to the archives of this and the ports list, 
this has come up before, but there wasn't any obvious
solution--in one case it just seemed that lgiconv had
been in an earlier version of libiconv, and then been
deleted, but that had been some time ago and if this
had been the problem I would have expected scrollkeeper
to have been fixed itself.

I've made an effort to get all potentially related 
ports updated to their most recent version, but it
hasn't had any effect. I'd be quite grateful if 
someone could tell me what I'm missing.

Thanks.

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]