Problem with ssh

2008-03-18 Thread White Hat
I have tried using the following command with negative results.
 
  ssh -L 5902:localhost:5901 scorpio
 
That produces this error message:
 
  Permission denied (publickey).

I found a reference to this command at:
 
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/vnc/sshvnc.html
 
I cannot figure out how to correct whatever the problem is. I am attempting to 
connect to a FreeBSD-6.3 machine running 'TightVNC' from a WinXP machine. The 
connection works fine using a regular connection; however, I would prefer to 
use 'ssh' and limit the port to localhost for security.
 
Thanks!

-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Redirecting output

2007-12-18 Thread White Hat
I am trying to find out exactly what is the difference between:
 
{command} 21  /dev/null
 
and
 
{command} dev/null 21
 
I have seen both used and have not been able to decipher what the difference 
is. It would seem that the first one would be the one that is correct.
 
-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Storing variable in Bash

2007-11-20 Thread White Hat
I am attempting to write a script that will work on files stored in an array. 
The function is supposed to strip the files extension and then store the name 
of the file as a variable. This is what I have so far.
 
#!/usr/local/bin/bash

declare -a fname
declare -i count
declare -i limit

fname=( `ls *.sh | tr '\n' ' '` )
count=${#fname[*]}
limit=0

while [ ${limit} -lt ${count} ]; do
echo ${fname[$limit]} | sed -e ``/.sh/s///''
# do something here
limit=$((limit+1))
done
 
What I want to do is store the file in a variable. I have tried this:
 
F_Name=echo ${fname[$limit]} | sed -e ``/.sh/s///''
 
As well as:
 
F_Name=( `echo ${fname[$limit]} | sed -e ``/.sh/s///''` )
 
along with several different variants of it, but without success. I continually 
receive an error message. Due to a particular situation, I cannot use 
'basename' to accomplish this task.
 
Is there anyway that this can be done?
 
Thanks!
-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  

Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. 
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


' Openssl.cnf ' and ' .rand ' file

2007-11-10 Thread White Hat
openssl 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004

I have not been able to find an answer to this question on Google, so I figured 
I had better ask it here.
 
In the '/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf' file, there is an entry for:
 
RANDFILE= $dir/private/.rand# private random number file
 
Well, that file does not exist. I cannot find it anywhere on my system and I 
have not been able to figure out how to create it.
 
Also, where could I locate some information on the 'openssl.cnf' file. There 
does not appear to be a 'man' page for it. I would like some more information 
on what all of the settings mean and possibly how to set them for my particular 
needs.
 
Thanks!
 
-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Configure to use WITH_DEBUG

2007-11-05 Thread White Hat
I have a system that I am setting up that will only be used to test programs. I 
therefore want all programs built with debug code. To facilitate that task, I 
was wondering if I could put a global flag in the '/etc/make.conf' file. 
Assuming that would work, which of these is the better solution.
 
1)WITH_DEBUG
2)WITH_DEBUG=1
3)WITH_DEBUG=true
4)-DWITH_DEBUG
 
If there is a better solution, I would appreciate hearing about it.
 
Thanks!

-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Configure to use WITH_DEBUG

2007-11-05 Thread White Hat
 In response to White Hat :
 
  I have a system that I am setting up that will only be used to test 
  programs.
  I therefore want all programs built with debug code. To facilitate that 
  task, I
  was wondering if I could put a global flag in the '/etc/make.conf' file.
  Assuming that would work, which of these is the better solution.
  
  1) WITH_DEBUG
  2) WITH_DEBUG=1
  3) WITH_DEBUG=true
  4) -DWITH_DEBUG
  
  If there is a better solution, I would appreciate hearing about it.
 
 #2 and #3 will work.
 The key is that the variable is set, not what it's set to. As a joke,
 you can do WITH_DEBUG=no in make.conf, and confuse the hell out of other
 sysadmins.
 
 Note that there may be additional port-specific debugging that would
 not be turned on by the global WITH_DEBUG, but you'll have to handle
 that on a port-by-port basis.
 
 -- 
 Bill Moran
 http://www.potentialtech.com
 
Interesting. Now if I want to turn DEBUG off for a particular port, would I use:
 
1)WITH_DEBUG
2)WITH_DEBUG=
3)WITH_DEBUG=
 
One other question. From what I have been reading, the use of 'WITH_DEBUG' also 
prevents the stripping of debug code when the program is installed. Is that 
correct, or do I have to use another flag to insure that debug code is not 
stripped from the installed program?


 Thanks again!

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Determining the number of files in a directory

2007-11-03 Thread White Hat
This is probably a dumb question; however, I never let a little thing like that 
bother me in the past.
 
Using FreeBSD-6.2 and Bash, how do I determine the number of files in a given 
directory? I have tried all sorts of combinations using different flags with 
the 'ls' command; however, none of them displays the number of files in the 
directory.
 
Other than, by writing a script to accomplish this feat, how could I achieve my 
goal?
 
Thanks!
 
-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Using OpenSSL from ports

2007-10-23 Thread White Hat
Is there any real advantage to installing 'openssl'
from ports rather than using the version installed in
the base system? Other than the fact that the port
version is slightly newer, is there any other major
difference?

Also, if I did install the port version, how would I
insure that applications would use it as opposed to to
the version in the base system?

Thanks!

-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FTP CRON Script

2007-10-10 Thread White Hat
This is driving me crazy. I have a small script that I
run from CRON. It is run as a regular user and not as
ROOT, although I have tried it both ways. It uploads
SPAM to the 'knujon.com' site'.

I have created a ~/.netrc file that looks like this:

machine knujon.com
login user
password secret


macdef  spam
put $1
quit



Now, if I run the following command from the command
prompt, the script works fine.

echo \$ spam spam.zip | ftp -n
ftp://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The above should all be on one line, although it may
be shown split into two right now.

However, if this is put into a bash script, and run if
from CRON, I receive a mail with this error message:

'spam' macro not found.

I have no idea what I am doing wrong.

I have the $HOME, $SHELL and $PATH variables set in
CRON.


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   

Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! 
FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Configuring FBSD to use HP Photosmart C6180

2007-09-30 Thread White Hat
I just purchased a HP Photosmart C6180 All-in-One
printer. It is connected to my network via a wireless
network. The FBSD PC is hardwired to the router. The
printer works flawlessly from the WinXP machines on
the network.

I installed the 'hplip' port without any difficulties.
I tried snmpwalk and it worked fine. The problem is
that I do not know how to configure FBSD to use the
printer to print with. There does not seem to be any
real information on how to configure a remote printer
using the configuration that I have. I have tried
different setting in '/etc/printcap' but without
success. I cannot find any documentation on how to
configure this port correctly.

Perhaps, if someone is using this port they could
assist me.

Thanks

-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   

Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Meaning of: kill -USR2

2007-08-31 Thread White Hat
I have seen 'kill -USR2' used in some scripts;
however, I am unable to find out exactly what it is
referring to. The man page for 'kill' does not list
any 'USR2' flag or signal, unless I am reading it
incorrectly.

Perhaps, someone can tell me exactly what this signal
means.

Thanks!

-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   

Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Dell Wireless All-In-One 966 Printer

2007-08-11 Thread White Hat
I am considering purchasing a Dell Wireless All-In-One
966 Printer, I really need a wireless printer and this
one seems to be exactly what I am looking for.

Unfortunately, I have not been able to secure a great
deal of technical information regarding this device.
Has anyone on this forum used this device with
FreeBSD-6.2; and if so, where you successful?

Thanks!


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   

Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play 
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Build Failure: claws-mail-etpan_privacy-0.15.5_8

2007-07-08 Thread White Hat
-mail/gtk -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -D_THREAD_SAFE
-I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include
-I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0
-I/usr/local/include/cairo
-I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include
-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium2 -MT
etpan_privacy_la-plugin.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/etpan_privacy_la-plugin.Tpo -c plugin.c  -fPIC
-DPIC -o .libs/etpan_privacy_la-plugin.o
plugin.c:67: error: conflicting types for
'plugin_done'
/usr/local/include/claws-mail/common/plugin.h:45:
error: previous declaration of 'plugin_done' was here
gmake[2]: *** [etpan_privacy_la-plugin.lo] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/mail/claws-mail-etpan_privacy/work/etpan-privacy-0.15.5/src'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/mail/claws-mail-etpan_privacy/work/etpan-privacy-0.15.5'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/ports/mail/claws-mail-etpan_privacy.

Script done on Sun Jul  8 07:38:23 2007



-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   

Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Build with debug symbols

2007-05-20 Thread White Hat
If I build a port with debugging information; i.e.
'make -g', is that debugging information stripped out
when the program is installed? If so, is there anyway
to prevent this from happening?

I have been attempting to build 'claws-mail' with
debugging information; however, when I run the program
under 'gdb' that information does not appear to be
present. I heard that there was a 'STRIP' flag I could
set; however, I cannot find any definitive information
regarding it.


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
Building
 a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to 
get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


vidcontrol: getting active vty: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2007-05-19 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD-6.2
Xfce 4 Desktop Environment
version 4.4.1 (Xfce 4.4)

When I switch to the terminal from within Xfce, I see
this message displayed:

vidcontrol: getting active vty: Inappropriate ioctl
for device

I have this entry in the ~/.bash_profile file:

vidcontrol lightcyan

There doesn't appear to be any problem, therefore I
was just wondering why I am receiving this error message.

-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Perl Script in Apache

2007-05-05 Thread White Hat
I tried to get an answer to this on the Apache forum,
but unfortunately, I was not successful.

Running Apache on a FreeBSD-6.2 machine, I am
attempting to set up a web page that changes a
specific image on a daily basis. I found a Perl script
that is supposed to do this, but it seems to fail. All
that is displayed is a red [X]. If I run the script
from the command line, it works, as it should. Well,
at least it displays the correct file name.

I assume I am doing something wrong with the actual
web page, or else I am incorrectly calling the Perl
script.

This is a commented version of the script.

=

To display an image simply use this in your HTML:
img
src=/usr/local/www/apache22/data/perl_script.pl

#!/usr/local/bin/perl

# find out the day of the year
my $day_of_year = (localtime(time()))[7];

# define the path where the images live . is the
current directory
$path = /usr/local/www/apache22/data/pics;
# read all the jpg, gif or png filenames from the
directory into an array
opendir(DIR, $path);
@files = grep { /\.(jpg|gif|png)$/i } readdir(DIR);
closedir(DIR);

# sort the filenames alphabetically
@files = sort( {lc $a cmp lc $b} @files);

# count the number of images
$no_of_images = scalar(@files);

# Now the fun bit :) We loop through the images once
before
# repeating them in the same order. If we divide the
current
# number of day of the year by the number of images in
the
# directory we get the number of times have repeated
the images.
# We are interested in the remainder of this
calculation (this
# is calculated using the % operator). Note - there
must be
# less than 365 images in the directory! We need to
subtract
# one from this number because arrays start at zero
not 1!
if ( $no_of_images = $day_of_year ) {
  $image_to_use = ($day_of_year % $no_of_images)-1;
}
else {
  $image_to_use = $day_of_year-1;
};
print Location: $files[$image_to_use]\n\n;

=


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
Browse Top Cars by Green Rating at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


gimp: install conflicts

2007-04-14 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD-6.2

I have a question regarding gimp-devel, the meta-port
for Gimp.

This port installs both:

graphics/gimp-app which has this in its Makefile:

CONFLICTS= gimp-1.* gimpshop-[0-9]*
gimp-app-devel-[0-9]*

And graphics/gimp-app-devel

Whose Makefile contains this notation:

CONFLICTS= gimp-1.* gimp-app-[0-9]*

Using portmanager to install gimp-devel results in the
following files being installed:

===
gimp-app-2.3.15,1   /graphics/gimp-app-devel
MISSING dependency of   gimp-devel-2.3,2  
/graphics/gimp-devel

gutenprint-base-5.1.0_1 /print/gutenprint-base
MISSING dependency of   gimp-gutenprint-5.1.0 
/print/gimp-gutenprint

gimp-app-2.2.13_2,1 /graphics/gimp-app
MISSING dependency of   gimp-gutenprint-5.1.0 
/print/gimp-gutenprint

gutenprint-ijs-5.1.0/print/gutenprint-ijs
MISSING dependency of   gutenprint-5.1_1  
/print/gutenprint

gutenprint-5.1_1/print/gutenprint
MISSING dependency of   gimp-gutenprint-5.1.0 
/print/gimp-gutenprint

gimp-gutenprint-5.1.0   /print/gimp-gutenprint
MISSING dependency of   gimp-devel-2.3,2  
/graphics/gimp-devel

gimp-devel-2.3,2/graphics/gimp-devel
MISSING gimp-devel-2.3,2  
/graphics/gimp-devel


The problem is that there appears to be a conflict
between the two versions of gimp-app being installed.
Is this correct, or am I reading this incorrectly?

If I try to update these files, portmanager will
complain about the conflict, although it does not do
so on the initial installation.

I can supply a copy of the build log if anyone wants
it.


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reinstalling 'vlc-devel'

2007-03-23 Thread White Hat
A few days ago, there was a warning in the
'/usr/ports/UPDATING' file regarding removing
'/multimedia/vlc' prior to updating. Anyway, I had
'vlc-devel' installed; however, I deleted it anyway to
be safe. I now assume that I can simply reinstall the
port via: make install  make clean. Is that
correct?

Thanks!


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Get your own web address.  
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Westell USB network adapter

2007-03-22 Thread White Hat
Having gotten sick of my cable company, I am
considering switching to Verizon FIOS. They want to
install a Actiontec Router Model MI424-WR. They
recommend the Westell USB network adapter. Does anyone
have any experience with that unit and FBSD. I can use
any adapter I want as long as it works with their
router. I can use a hard wired system; however, if I
can get the wireless system working correctly, I would
rather do it that way. There are three computers on
this network, two WinXP and one FBSD-6.2 system.

Thanks!


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Updating GCC

2007-03-22 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD-6.2

The installed version is gcc-3.4.6, while the ports
have version 4.3.0 available. If I install the newer
version will it replace the older version? If not and
I don't think it will, how do I force the use of the
newer version of Gcc when making a port? I tried
Googling for this but without success. The FreeBSD
handbook doesn't seem to have any available
information on this either.

Ciao!


-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peek at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Updating GCC

2007-03-22 Thread White Hat
--- Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mar 22, 2007, at 12:34 PM, White Hat wrote:
  Add:
 
  CC?=   /usr/local/bin/gcc
  CXX?=  /usr/local/bin/g++
 
  ...to /etc/make.conf.  You might also find
 looking
  at /usr/ports/Mk/
  bsd.gcc.mk to be informative...
 
  Thanks! One other question; why the '?' mark? I
was
  Googling for information on gcc, and it listed
 'cxx='
  sans a question mark in it.
 
 It means set CC to this value if it's not already
 set to something.
 
 Some ports already know they need a newer version of
 gcc (using  
 USE_GCC=), and the make world infrastructure to
 rebuild the  
 kernel/userland need to use the system-provided
 compiler, so using  
 the question mark lets things which know better use
 the exact  
 compiler they want.

Thanks! I could not find that information anywhere,
although I am sure it does exist.



 

Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


win32-codecs-3.1.0.r1,1 marjed FORBIDDEN

2007-03-13 Thread White Hat
I have noticed that port /multimedia/win32-codecs  has been  marked 
'FORBIDDEN' for quite sometime now. This is the win32-codecs-3.1.0.r1,1 port. I 
would really like to get this port installed. Is there any way to circumvent 
this 'FORBIDDEN' problem? Perhaps someone knows when this port will be made 
available again?
 
Thanks!
 
-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 

Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396546091
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: win32-codecs-3.1.0.r1,1 marked FORBIDDEN

2007-03-13 Thread White Hat
- Original Message 
From: Lars Eighner [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, White Hat wrote:

 I have noticed that port /multimedia/win32-codecs  has been  marked
 'FORBIDDEN' for quite sometime now. This is the win32-codecs-3.1.0.r1,1
 port. I would really like to get this port installed. Is there any way to
 circumvent this 'FORBIDDEN' problem? Perhaps someone knows when this port
 will be made available again?

 If you don't know enough to comment out the FORBIDDEN line in the Makefile,
 perhaps you shouldn't have this port.

Well, that is an option. From what I have discovered, the problem is with the 
QuickTime codec. It has been a problem for an extended period of time. Perhaps 
the maintainer should just remove that option form the port, or issue a warning 
that, that codec cannot be installed without specifically modifying the 
'makefile' or perhaps using a specific directive on the command line.

Then again, why make things simple.

BTW, I am subscribed to the list. There is no need to Cc: me. I don't need, nor 
did I request it.
-- 
White Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Clark's Law: Sufficiently advanced cluelessness is indistinguishable from 
malice.



 

Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail QA for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396546091
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


DEFAULT CFLAGS SETTING

2007-03-08 Thread White Hat
What is the default CFLAGS setting in FBSD-6.2 and would it improve performance 
any to set

CFLAGS=Os

as opposed to the default setting?
 
-- 
White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Not only is life a bItch, it has puppies.

Adrienne E. Gusoff


 

We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love 
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


mplayer (gmplayer) with xfce4.4.0

2007-03-07 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD-6.2
xfce-4.4.0

I posted this on the xfce4 list; however, they thought it might be a FreeBSD 
problem.

Scenario:

Right click on desktop
Click Multimedia
Click mplayer

This error message is displayed:

[ws] Shared Memory Extensions Error

I can start mplayer from a terminal window, but not directly on the xfce4 
desktop, now will gmplayer work either. The same error message is displayed.

I am hoping someone has a useful suggestion.
 


White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 

8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Opera + Spelling

2007-02-21 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD-6.2
Opera-9.10.20061214
xfce-4.4.0

I seem to be having a problem using the 'spell checking' feature form within 
Opera. When I click on the 'spell' icon, I am transfered to a page that tells 
me I have to install GNU Aspell . I already have this install I believe. This 
is the output of 'pkg_info aspell*:

Information for aspell-0.60.5:
Comment:
Spelling checker with better suggestion logic than ispell

Required by:
claws-mail-2.7.2
claws-mail-etpan_privacy-0.15.5_2
claws-mail-gtkhtml2_viewer-0.14.1_1
gtkspell-2.0.11_4
opera-9.10.20061214

Therefore, assuming that it is installed, why is Opera not finding it, and what 
can I do to alleviate the problem? I am running 'XFCE4' as an unprivileged user 
if that makes any difference.

Thanks!

-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

How many men does it take to open a beer?
None. It should be opened by the time she brings it to you.


 

Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Viewing on remote PC

2007-02-14 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD-6.2

I have a FBSD computer that I need to access via ssh from a WinXP machine 
running 'putty'. I am using ssh certificates for authorization. No problem 
there. I can do anything I want when I access the FBSD machine in this manner, 
except run something like KDE or XFCE4. I thought I made all of the required 
changes to the ssh_config and sshd_config as well as 'putty', but evidently not.

Situation:

I have 'startx' set to start 'xfce4' presently. If I type: 'startx' while 
logged in via ssh, xfce4 will start on the FBSD machine just fine. However, on 
the WinXP PC with 'putty', all I see are the start up messages on the screen. 
The actual GUI, etc. never appears. This makes using the program impossible 
from a remote location.

I am sure I am doing something really stupid here. Perhaps someone could point 
me i the right direction.

Thanks!
 
-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Using SSL certificates instead of password

2007-02-08 Thread White Hat
I am trying to set up one of my servers so that it can
be accessed only by a user with a proper SSL
certificate. I want to disable the use of passwords
completely.

I cannot seem to locate a good 'How To' regarding
this. In addition, the server, a FreeBSD-6.2 machine,
will be accessed by WinXP machines using Putty.

Where can I locate some good information on how to set
up such a configuration?

Thanks!

-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Portmanager - not working after ports change

2007-02-05 Thread White Hat
There was a change in the ports system -
/usr/ports/UPDATING 20070205 - which now renders
portmanager unable to run correctly. While it is
possible to update a single port; i.e., portmanager
/path/to-port/, if I attempt to do a general ports
update; i.e., portmanager -u, I receive the
following error message:

percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( oldPortsDbQTY-=6 /
oldPortsDbTOTALIZER-=6 ))
cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portmanager
rBsdPortMkPatch 0.4.1_7 error: bsd.port.mk
/usr/ports/Mk unable to restored from back up   cp
/usr/local/share/portmanager/bsd.port.mk-BACKUP
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk

I tried deinstalling portmanager and then installing
it from its new port directory; however, that failed
to alleviate the problem.

Has anyone else experienced this problem, and perhaps
have a solution?

Thanks!

-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best laptop for Freebsd

2006-11-16 Thread White Hat
On Thursday November 16, 2006 at 06:08:02 (AM)
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:

 I would expect it to shut up and work

We have that expectation for a lot of our employees;
however, as in your
scenario, it has not panned out.


-- 
White Hat

I never worry about being driven to drink; I just
worry about being
driven home.

 W. C. Fields


 

Sponsored Link

Rates near historic lows - 
$200,000 mortgage for $660/ month - 
http://yahoo.ratemarketplace.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Virtual Users sharing main account

2006-10-04 Thread White Hat
I doubt if this is possible; however, I thought I would inquire anyway.

Assuming a domain name of 'company.com', we want to add a group of users who 
could send and receive mail using this domain name; however, we do not want to 
give them shell accounts. They would access the system simply to send or 
receive their email. I have SSL/TLS set up and working correctly. At this time 
we also do not want to set up sub domains like: 'sales.company.com' either, 
although it may come to that.

I read through the Virtual documentation and I do not think it is possible. Is 
that correct, or is there a way to accomplish it.

Thank you!

-- 
 White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Moving to new PC

2006-09-18 Thread White Hat

From: Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[...]

the update for today is, that it is still going, but there has been quite a 
bit of delay while the ports stops on the knobs screen.  each time i see one, 
i hit the 'ok', but this is causing the obvious delays.

other than that, so far, no errors or halts.

I have an idea that it will work just fine. I already have a custom make.conf 
file that contains most of the knobs for apache, kde, etc that I have 
installed. I guess copying the config files would also be a good idea. Then 
just setting BATCH=yes would complete the process.

Thanks!



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Moving to new PC

2006-09-17 Thread White Hat
I am planning on migrating to a new PC in the near
future, perhaps after FBSD 6.2 is released. I was
therefore wondering if the following scenario was
possible.

1) Tar up the /var/db/pkg directory on old system
2) Untar the collection into the same location on new
PC
3) Run portsnap to get an up-to-date ports collection
4) Run portmanager to actually install the ports.

I have close to 500 entries in the directory and
trying to install them all manually is a lot of work.
Of course there are META packages like KDE, but still
I would have a lot of manual work involved to get it
all back to the same state I had it in on the old PC.
It would seem to me that by doing it in this fashion
all of the programs would be built correctly for the
new system which is going to be quite a bit different
than the one I have now.

In theory this seems to work, but I wanted to know if
it is actually possible before attempting it.

-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Moving to new PC

2006-09-17 Thread White Hat
--- Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]

 sounds interesting enough.  if you will supply the
 portmanager command syntax, 
 ill supply the test computer, and post the results.



I guess I would want to run portmanager in a force
update mode.

portmanager -u -f -l -y

should do it. It will create a log in
/var/log/portmanager.log so at least we can see what
transpires. The '-y' flag may not be necessary, but
should not hurt. It will force it to answer yes to any
questions. The only problem that I could forsee is the
building of Java. Those files would have to be
download prior to the build and installed in the
/usr/ports/distfiles directory. I think portmanager by
default does not do Java. That means that the
pm-020.conf file will have to be modified. Not a big
deal though.


-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SCSI vs. SATA (was Re: Upgrading our mail server)

2006-09-14 Thread White Hat
--- Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  Gerard Seibert wrote:
   Frank Bonnet wrote:
   
   [...]
   I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around
 10K$
   
   Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason
 that SATA or RAID with
   SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
  
Because I want it
 
 Has anyone every verified whether or not SATA has
 the problems that plagued
 ATA?  Such as crappy quality and lying caches?
 
 Personally, I still demand SCSI on production
 servers because it still
 seems as if:
 a) The performance is still better
 b) The reliability is still better
 
 But I haven't taken a comprehensive look at the SATA
 offerings.  It also
 seems as if SATA is more limiting.  Most SCSI cards
 can support 16
 devices, does SATA have similar offerings?  I know
 it's not common, but
 if you need that many spindles, you need them!

I have see benchmarks on the PC-Mag site or maybe it
was PC-World that would seem to indicate that all
things being equal, SATA would outperform SCSI. I have
a few friends using SATA and RAID without any
problems.  My next server, hopefully by years end,
will use that sort of configuration. Sorry, but that
is about all I can tell you.



-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Firefox+Flash

2006-09-14 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD 6.1

I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
major problems is the inability to get flash to work
properly to display videos available on Google. I know
that the linux-flash port is marked broken, so that it
out. How else can I get flash to work so I can perhaps
persuade them to try FBSD?

I have KDE and Firefox installed obviously. I tried
loading a few of the flash packages available in the
ports, but they did not not seem to work.

Thanks!

-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firefox+Flash

2006-09-14 Thread White Hat
--- michael johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK, assuming I remove Firefox and install
linux-firefox, which what version of flash in the
ports tree am I suppose to install to make it all
work? 


-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Making startup order static

2006-09-11 Thread White Hat
--- Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]

 I believe 6.1 uses rcorder for scripts from
 /usr/local/etc/rc.d, in 
 which case you might be able to create local patches
 in the relevant 
 ports which added appropriate e.g.
 
 # BEFORE:
 # PROVIDES:
 # REQUIRE:
 
 lines to force the order you want.  This assumes
 that they do not use 
 .sh suffixed scripts and that you use cvsup rather
 than portsnap, which 
 I believe would trash your local patches.

I do employ portsnap, so that would probably not be a
viable solution. I am presently looking into
implementing one that was suggested by a recent
poster. I would have thought that there would have
existed a simpler method to control on a  permanent
basis the loading of programs. I guess not.

-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Making startup order static

2006-09-10 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD 6.1

I need to keep several programs starting in a
particular order.

clamav-clamd
clamav-freshclam
clamsmtpd
saslauthd
dovecot
postfix
fetchmail

By default, they do not start in that order. I have
modified the rc.d files to force them to start in the
order specified above.

The problem is that every time I update these programs
the rc.d startup file is modified which destroys the
changes I have made. This then requires me to recreate
the modifications to force the start up order I
require.

Is there anyway I can achieve this goal in a
simplified manner? I thought perhaps there might be
something I could add to the /etc/rc.conf file;
however, I have not discovered it.




-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Making startup order static

2006-09-10 Thread White Hat
--- Martin Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 thought about using PROVIDE and REQUIRE keywords
 (see
 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/clamav-clamd.sh resp.
 clamav-freshclam.sh 
 
 Maybe you might want to have a look into man rc or
 man rcorder 
 
 Cheers,
   -Martin-
  
  FreeBSD 6.1
 
  I need to keep several programs starting in a
  particular order.
 
  clamav-clamd
  clamav-freshclam
  clamsmtpd
  saslauthd
  dovecot
  postfix
  fetchmail
 
  By default, they do not start in that order. I
have
  modified the rc.d files to force them to start in
  the
  order specified above.
 
  The problem is that every time I update these
  programs
  the rc.d startup file is modified which destroys
the
  changes I have made. This then requires me to
  recreate
  the modifications to force the start up order I
  require.
 
  Is there anyway I can achieve this goal in a
  simplified manner? I thought perhaps there might
be
  something I could add to the /etc/rc.conf file;
  however, I have not discovered it.

Martin, I don't think that you understood what I
meant. Either that or I described it incorrectly.

I did modify the rc.d files using BEFORE: and
REQUIRE:. That works just fine. The problem is if one
of those files is updated, the rc.d file is
overwritten resulting in the loss of my customization.
I therefore have to manually edit those files again. I
was trying to find someway to circumvent that
procedure.



-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Making startup order static

2006-09-10 Thread White Hat
--- J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 how about putting them in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
 and then using a numeric to start them
 
 001file.sh
 002file.sh
 
 or create a script with just one file.sh ?

I had considered that approach. The problem is if the
program is updated it will will write a new file to
the rc.d directory. Since I sort of automate the
updating of my system, if I was not vigilante in
inspecting the rc.d directory, I could very well end
up with two scripts starting the same program. I am
not sure how that would work; however, I would assume
it would not be a good thing. Furthermore, I am not
sure if the numeric thing would really work unless I
also modified the REQUIRE: and BEFORE: settings in the
scripts(s).

I was hoping that there would be a master config file
that I could manipulate so that each script is started
in a precise order irregardless of its name.



-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Making startup order static

2006-09-10 Thread White Hat
--- Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]
 
 I also had the same scenario with order in startup.
 That was rectified
 by setting up one script to start each of the items
 in order.

I am assuming that you removed the scripts that you
called from the rc.d directory. What transpired when
you updated a program? Assuming it created a file in
rc.d, you then had to manually remove it correct?

I am thinking that I could create a script that would
check to see if a file existed in rc.d that I had
chosen to start manually and if so it would then
delete or move the file. However, I would have to
ensure that, that script started prior to any other
script.

It really should not be this difficult. A master file
dictating the start order of every script in rc.d
would be a cool idea. 


-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Making startup order static

2006-09-10 Thread White Hat
--- Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]
 
 No.  I  believe  I  used the startup script for
 sa-spamd as a starting
 point.  I'm sure others could be used as a starting
 point as well. I'm
 still  in  the learning process. That way I could
 remove the ones from
 the rc.conf that I wanted to start in order and use
 the 'force' option
 when loading them from the custom startup script.
 
 So,  as  an example, if you do not have a
 'spamd=YES' in the rc.conf
 and  you  attempt  to start spamd from the console,
 it will not start.
 That  is  because  of  the  sa-spamd startup script.
 If you attempt to
 start  spamd from the console and supply 'force
 start', it will start.
 Therefore,  in my startup script I left it out of
 the rc.conf and used
 the 'force start' in my custom startup script.

I can see how that could work. It is still a hack, but
better than nothing. If I cannot come up with anything
else, I will give that a try.

[...]



-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: solaris

2006-09-06 Thread White Hat


--- backyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 I think the important thing to remember in all this
 is
 every system using one version of UNIX over another
 is
 one more machine not running NT. And since NT is
 single handedly stealing code, and destroying
 internationally set standards I think the more UNIX
 the merrier. Even if you're running a Mac... I find
 the most important thing is trying to get people to
 realize a computer isn't ment to tell you what you
 can
 or cannot do, an Administrator should be able to
 kill
 any running process on a system, you should be able
 to
 choose what software is installed on your computer,
 your web browser or PNP system shouldn't allow
 Viruses
 or software in general to be installed on your
 machine
 without your knowledge or consent, and most
 importantly you should be able to take your hard
 drive
 out of your machine and put it in another one and
 keep
 on going.

IMHO, you are way over simplifying this. An OS should
accomplish easily what an end users deems necessary. A
very large majority of users simply want to use their
PCs for email, occasional word processing and possible
game playing. Perhaps even playing a video or music.
Most of these can be far more easily done on a WinXP
machine then anything now available in the *nix
family.  I have spent hours and still can not get
flash to work correctly on my PC. Getting a printer to
work can be a chore. There was ever a post just the
other day regarding the simple use of a CD Drive. I
have seen questions asked about using a floppy drive.
The list goes on and on. Most seven year olds would be
lost on a  on FreeBSD machine. FreeBSD is an excellent
tool, but it does not serve every purpose excellently.
I use it as a server both for mail, and web use. I
leave the printing and word processing/spreadsheet
stuff on Windows where it works quite nicely. I have
tried Open Office. No matter what anyone says, it is
just not as full featured as Word 2003. It is not even
close.

I agree that a large portion of the problems relate to
the fact that vendors are not inclined to produce
drivers for their products, which in many cases lends
these devices either useless or crippled in a FreeBSD
environment. However, you cannot hold a gun to their
head and expect them to expend the resources required
to satisfy every OS available if the monetary returns
do not justify it. That is simple economics 101.

By the way, you can shut down processes, etc. on a
WinXP platform; you just have to know where to look.
That is similar to any other OS. You are missing the
concept behind Windows. It is designed to be a drop in
 and run system. Dozens of user polls have shown that
the average user just wants to use his PC. He/she does
not want to read tons of manuals and spend hours in a
frustrating attempt to get it to run. The average user
does not care about configuring firewall, AV or
Spyware, etc. Just drop in a copy of ZA with perhaps
Sunbelt's Counter Spy and they are on their way. They
want a new printer - no problem. Drop in the CD, it
configures the PC for the printer and the jobs done.
Please, don't tell me about the friend who did that
and it did not work. Nothing always works. Usually
though the problem can be attributed to 'PEBKC'.

 Solaris is cool if it will run, FreeBSD will run if
 Solaris won't; lets band together and destroy
 Micrsoft... :)

Please, I just had a friend laid of from Intel. The
last thing I would want to see is MS out of business
and thousands of people out of work because of your
seemingly unqualified hated of a product. If you don't
like it, don't use it. How much simpler can it get? I
seriously doubt that you can submit proof of a single
individual laid off because MS does not embrace your
philosophical beliefs.

-- 
White Hat


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: solaris

2006-09-06 Thread White Hat
--- Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 06/09/06, White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
   I have
  tried Open Office. No matter what anyone says, it
 is
  just not as full featured as Word 2003. It is not
 even
  close.
 
 
 True, but also compare the cost. Not even close...

Immaterial. the singularly most important feature is
suitability to task. If it is free and it does not
work, what good is it?

 He/she does
  not want to read tons of manuals and spend hours
 in a
  frustrating attempt to get it to run.
 
 
 This is where you are completely wrong. I work for
 an ISP. I'm not
 responsible for tech support but I keep my ear to
 the ground. A VERY large
 number of callers have problems configuring Outlook
 Express, for example. No
 matter what the polls say, the experience is often
 very different. They may
 not read the manuals (because they are no longer
 supplied), they just ring a
 call centre instead.

Yes, the lack of documentation is a shame. Usually it
can be obtained for an additonal cost which I suppose
is better than nothing. The same lack of documentation
plagues every facet of software today. Of course, it
has been a boon for the after market book manual
publishers. BTW, you have failed to document so called
help line assistants who are nothing more than company
mouth pieces who have at most a superficial knowledge
of the product that they are suppose to be assistant a
customer with. I had the experience of talking with a
customer support moron who tried to sell me a new
router while I attempted to explain the router was
fine, but the installation CD was defective. I
eventually just sent it back for a replacement.
Usually these individuals are barely equipped to
handle the job they are given.

However, you have made my point. If a user cannot
decipher how to configure a simple thing like Outlook
Express, and there are programs available that will do
it for them, then how are they suppose to be capable
of handling a CLI OS like FreeBSD? It boggles the mind
-- at least mine. Worse, the configuration of OE is
handled by a wizard. It is truly sad when a user
cannot configure something when it is simplified down
to that level.

 The average user
  does not care about configuring firewall, AV or
  Spyware, etc. Just drop in a copy of ZA with
 perhaps
  Sunbelt's Counter Spy and they are on their way.
 
 
 That's one statement contradicting the other.

How? Drop in two CDs or download the programs, run
them and case closed. Neither one requires any
significant configuration. The defaults work just fine
for most users. You could eliminate the Counter Spy
since ZA has its own proprietary SpyWare program, but
I just happen to prefer Counter Spy.

BTW, if MS actually does market it 'One Care' program
suite, that might even obsolete that entire process. I
don't think they will offer it with the OS though. Too
much of a chance the government will protest.
Personally I believe a company should be allowed to
market its product anyway it wants without government
intervention; however, that is entirely another story.

-- 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: solaris

2006-09-06 Thread White Hat
--- Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 06/09/06, White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  --- Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   On 06/09/06, White Hat
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
   
 I have
tried Open Office. No matter what anyone says,
 it
   is
just not as full featured as Word 2003. It is
 not
   even
close.
  
  
   True, but also compare the cost. Not even
 close...
 
  Immaterial. the singularly most important feature
 is
  suitability to task. If it is free and it does not
  work, what good is it?
 
 
 In what way does it not work? It's enough for many
 people, so why should
 they pay more?

I never said that anyone should pay more. I simply
said that it was not suitable for the tasks that both
I, and primarily my wife, use it for. Again, the price
of an object is secondary to its usefulness. At the
very least it has to be compared against it.
 
  He/she does
not want to read tons of manuals and spend
 hours
   in a
frustrating attempt to get it to run.
  
  
   This is where you are completely wrong. I work
 for
   an ISP. I'm not
   responsible for tech support but I keep my ear
 to
   the ground. A VERY large
   number of callers have problems configuring
 Outlook
   Express, for example. No
   matter what the polls say, the experience is
 often
   very different. They may
   not read the manuals (because they are no longer
   supplied), they just ring a
   call centre instead.
 
  Yes, the lack of documentation is a shame. Usually
 it
  can be obtained for an additonal cost which I
 suppose
  is better than nothing. The same lack of
 documentation
  plagues every facet of software today. Of course,
 it
  has been a boon for the after market book manual
  publishers. BTW, you have failed to document so
 called
  help line assistants who are nothing more than
 company
  mouth pieces who have at most a superficial
 knowledge
  of the product that they are suppose to be
 assistant a
  customer with. I had the experience of talking
 with a
  customer support moron who tried to sell me a new
  router while I attempted to explain the router was
  fine, but the installation CD was defective. I
  eventually just sent it back for a replacement.
  Usually these individuals are barely equipped to
  handle the job they are given.
 
  However, you have made my point. If a user cannot
  decipher how to configure a simple thing like
 Outlook
  Express, and there are programs available that
 will do
  it for them, then how are they suppose to be
 capable
  of handling a CLI OS like FreeBSD? It boggles the
 mind
  -- at least mine. Worse, the configuration of OE
 is
  handled by a wizard. It is truly sad when a user
  cannot configure something when it is simplified
 down
  to that level.
 
 
 So on the one hand you think that for the sake of
 the morons FreeBSD should
 made into something other than a CLI OS (which if
 you put KDE or GNOME on
 it it already is, btw), and on the other hand you
 despise the morons who
 can't even use a wizard?

I never inferred that FBSD should evolve into
anything. It performs quite nicely as a CLI. Printing
is not all that great, and the use of many devices
such as web cams can prove to be a chore to install,
but that has more to due with the creators of those
devices and lack thereof of proper drivers, etc. Even
devices that do work are not always fully supported.
Again, most likely the device creators are not
supporting the device under FreeBSD, or any other OS
except win32. Again, it is all about monetary return.
I cannot blame them, I like to eat too.

Furthermore, I never said I despise anyone, except
perhaps pseudo technical help employees. However, even
they have to eat. I stated that it was a sad day when
someone could not ever configure OE, even when
assisted with a wizard. I think it is rather obvious
that these individuals would not be the target market
for FBSD.

  The average user
does not care about configuring firewall, AV
 or
Spyware, etc. Just drop in a copy of ZA with
   perhaps
Sunbelt's Counter Spy and they are on their
 way.
  
  
   That's one statement contradicting the other.
 
  How? Drop in two CDs or download the programs, run
  them and case closed. Neither one requires any
  significant configuration. The defaults work just
 fine
  for most users. You could eliminate the Counter
 Spy
  since ZA has its own proprietary SpyWare program,
 but
  I just happen to prefer Counter Spy.
 
 
 A decent router does not require any significant
 configuration either,
 despite the fact that it should include a firewall.
 And if you use a
 router/firewall, you shouldn't need to configure a
 firewall on your
 desktop/server either.

The key word here is 'significant'. That varies by
user to user. I believe that the use of an internal
firewall might very well be dictated by a users LAN
configuration. I only have four units networked
together, with only one avenue to the Internet, so
perhaps I don't need an extensive

Re: solaris

2006-09-06 Thread White Hat
--- Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 06/09/06, White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 
  Immaterial. the singularly most important feature
 is
  suitability to task. If it is free and it does not
  work, what good is it?
 
 It depends what you are using it for. You made a
 comment about occaisonal
 word processing (pasted below). For such use
 OpenOffice is perfectly good
 enough.

That is a totally unqualified evaluation. While it may
be totally suitable for one individual, that in no way
infers that it meets the requirements of another.
There is no way you can define an end users
requirements based solely on your own usage.

  Yes, the lack of documentation is a shame.
 
 In Windows, yes. In FreeBSD I can't see a lack.

You are kidding right. I can find vastly more
documentation available for a win32 machine than for
FBSD. In fact, the lact of documentation is one of the
reasons that support groups like this evolved. To my
great dismay, I am forced to search for and then
download documentation via the web. Even then, that is
often dated. Not anyones fault, it is just the way it
goes.

  The same lack of documentation
  plagues every facet of software today.
 
 No it doesn't. FreeBSD is well documented.

It is above average, I will agree. However, if it were
really perfect then this forum would not exist. 

 
 However, you have made my point.
 
 No I haven't. I have contradicted your point. You
 said  A very large
 majority of users simply want to use their PCs for
 email, occasional word
 processing and possible game playing. I am saying
 that using XP as you
 suggested is not as easy as you suggest for a very
 large number of people.

If that were true, MS would not rule 90+ percent of
the PCs in use today. Why do you think users in third
rate countries pirate MS when they could get FBSD for
free? I would not want to insult anyone; however, if
you cannot install an MS operating system then perhaps
you should consider another hobby. Even my wife's
sister can handle that project, and that is a woman
who considers a can opener a high tech device.
 
 If a user cannot
  decipher how to configure a simple thing like
 Outlook
  Express, and there are programs available that
 will do
  it for them, then how are they suppose to be
 capable
  of handling a CLI OS like FreeBSD? It boggles the
 mind
  -- at least mine. Worse, the configuration of OE
 is
  handled by a wizard. It is truly sad when a user
  cannot configure something when it is simplified
 down
  to that level.
 
 It's not so much the wizards, but third party
 applications like virus
 scanners which change those settings which is a part
 of the problem. But you
 are not quite comparing apples with apples.
 Configuring Thunderbird on
 FreeBSD is near enough identical to doing the same
 on Windows. I wouldn't
 however expect a complete computer novice to be able
 to set up a FreeBSD box
 without some help.

You have users here with 10+ years experience who run
int problems. It is just the nature of the beast. It
comes with the territory.

 How? Drop in two CDs or download the programs, run
  them and case closed. Neither one requires any
  significant configuration. The defaults work just
 fine
  for most users. You could eliminate the Counter
 Spy
  since ZA has its own proprietary SpyWare program,
 but
  I just happen to prefer Counter Spy.
 
 
 Your statement is simply wrong. AV and anti-spyware
 DO require
 configuration. And they do require installing, and
 maybe downloading, and
 being kept up to date. The defaults certainly don't
 work all the time in all
 cases. Have a look here: 

Obviously it required installation. Before you can
install, it is again obvious that you must secure the
item. One size definitely does not fit all. What is
your point?

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/06/faulty_ca_update/;.
 I have heard of
 broken installations for Norton numerous times. And
 trying to help these
 customers is time-consuming for our techies.

Norton is pathetic, that I will agree with you on that
one. That is why I switched three years ago to ZA. It
has never given me a moment of trouble, although the
CA AV it uses by default is not RFC 2595 compliant
which was causing my network problems. One I corrected
it though, everything was back to normal.

BTW, 'time consuming for your techies'? Ah gee, like
what are they paid for? To stand around and kiss each
others butt. I am sick of over paid techies who have
no working knowledge of what they are doing. If they
find their job to stressful, quit!

Please do me one favor, do not CC me. I am continually
getting two copies of these. I subscribe to the list.
I don't send you duplicate copies and therefore would
appreciate the same cutesy. Perhaps my address was
already inserted by a previous poster. If so, please
do remove it.

Thank You!


-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam

Re: solaris

2006-09-06 Thread White Hat
--- Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 06/09/06, White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  --- Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   On 06/09/06, White Hat
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:
   
--- Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 On 06/09/06, White Hat
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

[...]

Immaterial. the singularly most important
feature is suitability to task. If it is free
  and it does not work, what good is it?
  
   In what way does it not work? It's enough for
   many people, so why should they pay more?
 
  I never said that anyone should pay more. I simply
  said that it was not suitable for the tasks that
  both I, and primarily my wife, use it for.
 
 
 No, you said it does not work. It's up there in
 black and white.
 
 Again, the price

The inference was if the object is not suitable for a
designated task, then it is not a viable option.
Hence, it doesn't work. I had thought that was
obvious. The inference was certainly there. I did not
spell it out since this is a forum and I had no
inclination to turn this into a thesis. However, it is
also obvious that price is your determining factor.
Nothing wrong with that as long as it is declared up
front.

[...]

   That's a good idea. And I should be able to
 procure
   products and settle
   scores anyway I want without government
   intervention, too. /sarcasm
 
  Way out of line.
 
 
 Not out of line. Thee are many, many examples of
 companies already getting away with breaking the few
 rules that are there: why should those rules be
 relaxed so that they get away with even MORE at the
 expense of the buyer?
 
 No where did I even suggest the idea of retribution.
 
 
 Nor did I, as I noted, that was sarcasm.

Labeling it as sarcasm does not change the fact that
it was exactly what you meant. If I wear a T-shirt
that has emblazoned on it: touch me an I will kill
you, and someone actually touched me and I make good
on the treat, I cannot claim that they were
forewarned. By the way, what bothers you so much
regarding free enterprise, with the possible exception
that you are not experiencing any monetary rewards
from it? I
personally I detest what many corporations proceed to
do. However, it is their money and they have that
right. If you don't like their product, either ignore
it or make a better one. Bitching is for losers.



-- 

White Hat 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Errors with Dovecot

2006-08-26 Thread White Hat
FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE
Dovecot 1.0 rc2
Postfix 2.4

I recently installed Dovecot on my system to act as an
LDA and POP server. I have a simple mbox setup running
with
Postfix. Dovecot works as a POP server, but will not
operate an an LDA. When I attempt to use it as such
the mail gets
hung up in the mail queue. This is from the dovecot
log file:

deliver(jerry): Error:
open(/var/mail/.temp.whitehat.football.net.1928.e70d4dd9d14583ce)
failed: Permission denied
deliver(jerry): Error: file_lock_dotlock() failed with
mbox file /var/mail/jerry: Permission denied


This log continues with the same error message for
each message it attempts to deliver. Postfix can
deliver the mail
without any problems however.

I cannot seem to figure out what I am doing wrong. I
assume someone else in this forum is also using
Dovecot as an
LDA. Perhaps they can enlighten me.

Thanks!

Jerry


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]