Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Like I said...if it taxes their resources even one tenth of one percent,
I'm for it.
It's not their resources, it's the resources they have stolen from other
people by breaking into
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:01 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: John Levine; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> I would disagree on the
NO. I'm making it sound like greylisting is NOT the world's answer to
stopping spam. It's NOT a miracle cure, it is NOT the last, best hope
for peace.
Sigh. You might want to read the paper "Experiences with Greylisting"
from the 2005 CEAS conference.
It was my original intention to show t
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: John Levine; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
You're making it sound as if greylisti
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:08 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: John Levine; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> You're making
On Apr 30, 2007, at 6:19 AM, cpghost wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 01:16:23AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The system that would cause problems if it ran
greylisting is not MY system. It's the mailserver owned by the
cellular
company that I am sending to. If they went and installed
g
On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:36 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I don't understand why people are focusing on trying to redesign
the monitoring system I'm using. Don't you have any imagination
at all? The point was that there are legitimate situations where
the delays introduced by greylisting are a pr
>Cellular operators know that their clients expect speedy
>delivery of SMS, including those sent via SMTP.
Actually, in my experience SMTP to SMS gateways can have significant
delays unrelated to greylisting. Travel agencies like Orbitz send out
notices about flight changes and delays via SMTP->S
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Ted, usually I find your posts intelligent and food for thought, but
I almost think you're doing this on purpose now.
No, the problem is you haven't understood the point I was making.
Here's the summary as I understand it.
You're against greylisting because:
a) it'
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:05 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Christopher Hilton; User Questions
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Both of those are assumptions your making that are
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 01:16:23AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> The system that would cause problems if it ran
> greylisting is not MY system. It's the mailserver owned by the cellular
> company that I am sending to. If they went and installed greylisting
> it is highly unlikely I could get
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenny Dail
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 8:18 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> > > I'm monitoring system
> -Original Message-
> From: John Levine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 6:31 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> >> Email is not an instant messagi
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:40 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Eric Crist; Grant Peel; Christopher Hilton;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:05 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Christopher Hilton; User Questions
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> >
> > Both of those
> > I'm monitoring systems at the ISP I work at. No, it is not life or
> > death
> > if a feed goes down for 3 hours and a bunch of people cannot download
> > their daily freebsd-questions mailing list fix. At least, I don't
> > think
> > so. But they do. And as their money that buys the IS
On Apr 29, 2007, at 4:45 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sam Lawrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:59 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Email is not an instant
>> Email is not an instant messaging system, no matter how much you want
>> it to be one.
>
>Cell phone companies won't take pages any other way no matter how much you
>want them to.
This might be a good time to learn about outfits like clickatell.com
that provide SMS gateway service. They char
On Apr 29, 2007, at 4:00 AMApr 29, 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If the monitoring system notices something down, I have to know about
it within a few minutes. I cannot wait for the mailserver that
sends the
page out to retry sending the page to the cell carrier's mailserver
in an hour.
Thi
: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their
mail
to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail
address is
in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a s
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:01 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Eric Crist; Grant Peel; Christopher Hilton;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Lawrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:59 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
>
> Email is not an instant messaging
-- Was: Anti Spam
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their
mail
to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail
address is
in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server
failur
On Apr 28, 2007, at 5:29 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
Hilton
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:45 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: User Questions
Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
Ted
-- Was: Anti Spam
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their
mail
to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail
address is
in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server
failure.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
> Hilton
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:45 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: User Questions
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> Ted Mittelstaed
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Silverstrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:58 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: Christopher Hilton; Grant Peel; Eric Crist;
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
&
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip]
When I scan my maillogs I find that 22% of the hosts that generate a
greylisting entry retry the mail delivery and thus get whitelisted. The
other 78% don't attempt redelivery within the greylisting window.
That's probably par.
However, the reason your putting
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
There are legitimate technical reasons that someone may want their
mail
to not be greylisted. For example, my cell phone's e-mail address is
in our monitoring scripts to page me in the event of a server failure.
I would be pretty pissed o
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Sean Hilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:05 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt; User Questions
> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> [snip...]
>
&g
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip...]
Greylisting works because many, and I'd like to say most, spam programs
never retry message delivery.
Actually, no. Greylisting works because it delays the spam injector
long enough that the injector will get blacklisted by the time that the
greylist opens t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
> Hilton
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 3:25 PM
> To: Grant Peel
> Cc: Eric Crist; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam
>
>
> Just my $0.02. Have you consi
32 matches
Mail list logo
