Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cheap controller in the USB enclosure. I've used quite
> > a few USB enclosures in the past years, and there are
> > significant performance differences. As a rule of thumb,
> > the cheaper the box, the slower it is. Of course there
> > are exc
Oliver Fromme writes:
> > > > you must have something wrong. my USB drive gets 27MB/s. yes this
> > > > 480Mbit/s is USB isn't real, but half of it is.
> >
> > i simply have no idea why it could work so slow.
>
> Cheap controller in the USB enclosure. I've used quite
> a few USB e
Cheap controller in the USB enclosure. I've used quite
a few USB enclosures in the past years, and there are
significant performance differences. As a rule of thumb,
the cheaper the box, the slower it is. Of course there
are exceptions to that rule.
actually - firewire enclosures are not much
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > you must have something wrong. my USB drive gets 27MB/s. yes this
> > > 480Mbit/s is USB isn't real, but half of it is.
> >
> > I agree.
> > Want to take this private and help figure out what's wrong?
> > :-)
>
> i sim
you must have something wrong. my USB drive gets 27MB/s. yes this
480Mbit/s is USB isn't real, but half of it is.
I agree.
Want to take this private and help figure out what's wrong?
:-)
i simply have no idea why it could work so slow.
___
Wojciech Puchar writes:
> >I /do/ have problems with speed. The fast recorded throughput
> > was aroud 3.5 bytes/second; faster than the SCSI-1 DLT it replaces,
>
> you must have something wrong. my USB drive gets 27MB/s. yes this
> 480Mbit/s is USB isn't real, but half of it is.
Wojciech Puchar writes:
Wojciech Puchar writes:
> > Do the tapes get taken off-site, or do they sit in the same
> > location that the servers will burn when a fire breaks out?
>
> probably sits on place, if not he wouldn't need tape changer, but
> would chang
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
- monthly
- yearly
...cycle them in that manner. No matter what anyone says, experience
states that I will bet on my monthly and yearly tapes as opposed to hard
disk every time when the CFO is under pressure to get that directory
that was 'o
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Do the tapes get taken off-site, or do they sit in the same location
that the servers will burn when a fire breaks out?
probably sits on place, if not he wouldn't need tape changer, but would
change manually :)
...not always. A tape changer in some cases i
Do the tapes get taken off-site, or do they sit in the same location that the
servers will burn when a fire breaks out?
probably sits on place, if not he wouldn't need tape changer, but would
change manually :)
Once the network backup is complete, cycle this complete backup to tape
and six incremental backups.
I have had no problems with reliability.
I /do/ have problems with speed. The fast recorded throughput
was aroud 3.5 bytes/second; faster than the SCSI-1 DLT it replaces,
you must have something wrong. my USB drive gets 27MB/s. yes this
480Mbit/s is U
Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
I run FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE on a file server and until recently used a Tape
Changer for backups. I'm considering my options for a new backup
solution. I'm actually thinking of ditching tape and using an externally
attached USB or Firewire disk drive.
Do
On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
External drives make nice, fast external hot-standby backups. They
are lousy for making long-term backups that you can take offsite,
though. I can and have restored decade old 20
Christopher Sean Hilton writes:
> I run FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE on a file server and until recently used a
> Tape Changer for backups. I'm considering my options for a new backup
> solution. I'm actually thinking of ditching tape and using an
> externally attached USB
On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
I run FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE on a file server and until recently used a
Tape Changer for backups. I'm considering my options for a new
backup solution. I'm actually thinking of ditching tape and using an
externally attac
I run FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE on a file server and until recently used a
Tape Changer for backups. I'm considering my options for a new backup
solution. I'm actually thinking of ditching tape and using an
externally attached USB or Firewire disk drive.
My experimentation isn't
0 bus 1:
at scbus1 target 6 lun 0 (sa0,pass1)
scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0:
< > at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0)
On one system which I've just updated from 6.1 to 6.3, the tape drive
has disappeared:
# camcontrol devlist -v
scbus
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 20:28 +0200, Frank Wißmann wrote:
> Hi, folks!
> I have bought for myself a taperecorder-to-usb-connector, which I wrote
> in /etc/usbd.conf as following:
> Device "Video tape"
> Product "0x2821"
> Vendor "0xeb1a"
>
>
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 22:11:16 Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:28:30PM +0200, Frank Wißmann wrote:
> > Hi, folks!
> > I have bought for myself a taperecorder-to-usb-connector, which I wrote
> > in /etc/usbd.conf as following:
> > Device "
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:28:30PM +0200, Frank Wißmann wrote:
> Hi, folks!
> I have bought for myself a taperecorder-to-usb-connector, which I wrote in
> /etc/usbd.conf as following:
> Device "Video tape"
> Product "0x2821"
> Vendor "0xeb1a"
Hi, folks!
I have bought for myself a taperecorder-to-usb-connector, which I wrote
in /etc/usbd.conf as following:
Device "Video tape"
Product "0x2821"
Vendor "0xeb1a"
Now I want to move all of my archived video tapes to harddisk/DVD. How
can I perform this,
Hi people.
I have 1 tape device attached to a FreeBSD 6.2-Release box for
bacula, sometimes i lost the connection with the device, doesn't
answer me, this happend not to often, but nothing is perfect, my doubt
is:
Once my console say:
Apr 4 12:25:46 bacula kernel: <<<<<&l
On the quantum web site, the internal DAT72 drives are choice of SATA, USB,
or SCSI. SATA listed first. The SATA drive part # is CD72SH-SB.
I'd love to not have to use the internal SCSI cabling for replacement. But
of course, I'd also like it to work. Hence the query.
Kent
___
to use a SATA replacement. Will this work?
I have never seen a DAT drive on a SATA controller.
Do they make them?
i found only SCSI and USB in Poland.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qu
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:22:09AM -1000, Kent Hauser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to replace a failed DAT72 drive. My current one is SCSI, but I'd like
> to use a SATA replacement. Will this work?
I have never seen a DAT drive on a SATA controller.
Do they make them?
jerry
>
> Thanks. Kent
>
Hi,
I need to replace a failed DAT72 drive. My current one is SCSI, but I'd like
to use a SATA replacement. Will this work?
Thanks. Kent
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubs
Hi,
I need to replace a failed DAT72 drive. My current one is SCSI, but I'd like
to use a SATA replacement. Will this work?
Thanks. Kent
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubs
On Saturday 23 February 2008 01:41:09 Peter Giessel wrote:
> >>i know dump do this, but i need other thing to be written to more than
> >> 1 tape.
> >
> >Well sonny in the old days we would create a volume with tar or cpio,
> > then uuencode it, then run
2. Outputs chunks in specified directory. You can configure it to write
directly to tape, but it's not the best solution.
3. Can be configured to write only N chunks and after that wait for SIGUSR1 to
write next.
4. Can be configured to write MD5-digest of every piece in separate file.
uuencode it, then run it through split. You could then move the split pieces
onto removable media and reassemble it on another system.
To put split piece back together you just cat them:
cat split2 split2 > total.uu
then uudecode it to restore the original file.
i know this but it makes tempo
en
>>
>>concattapes /dev/sa0 |something
>>
>>
>>i know dump do this, but i need other thing to be written to more than 1 tape.
>
>Well sonny in the old days we would create a volume with tar or cpio, then
>uuencode it, then run it through split.
I believe
At 01:23 PM 2/22/2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
anybody know program to split data (from stdin) on tapes like that
something|splittotapes /dev/sa0
and then
concattapes /dev/sa0 |something
i know dump do this, but i need other thing to be written to more than 1 tape.
Well sonny in the old
anybody know program to split data (from stdin) on tapes like that
something|splittotapes /dev/sa0
and then
concattapes /dev/sa0 |something
i know dump do this, but i need other thing to be written to more than 1
tape.
___
freebsd-questions
I have been working with this tapa drive: HP StorageWorks Ultrium 232
Tape Drive With FreeBSD 6.1-p16 and my scsi card is:
aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=6, 32/253 SCBs
I have running bacula since 1.38.10 with this tape drive, the i
update to 1.38.11 not to many changes, more than a
Run it through strace(1) and ktrace(1) in Linux and see what devices it
talks to in /dev and see if they can be emulated. It's probably talking
to /dev/ns{r,a}0 and /dev/ch0, depending on udev/autodev/
foo-bar-latest-greatest linux framework.
You might also check the Amanda/Bacula list archives.
Hi All,
We have an Exabyte VXA-2 tape drive that I'm planning to hook up to a FreeBSD
server. It's been on different box running linux for a few years.
Wondering if anyone has tried to run the "vxaTool" utility for this drive using
Linux emulation on FreeBSD? It's
On 6/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 28/05/07, perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm running bacula 1.38.11 with one tape storage-works 232 200Gb.
. . .
> Them, he says that my tape is full, but calculating all clients, is
> about 181G
On 28/05/07, perikillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running bacula 1.38.11 with one tape storage-works 232 200Gb.
. . .
Them, he says that my tape is full, but calculating all clients, is
about 181GB, them why hi say that my tape is full?
For raw capacity multiply the
In the last episode (May 28), perikillo said:
>I'm running bacula 1.38.11 with one tape storage-works 232 200Gb.
> But i start to get some errors about "Tape Full" like this:
>
> 28-May 04:30 bacula-dir: Start Backup JobId 1409,
> Job=MBXDBA-FD.2007-05-28_04.3
Hi people.
I'm running bacula 1.38.11 with one tape storage-works 232 200Gb. But i
start to get some errors about "Tape Full" like this:
28-May 04:30 bacula-dir: Start Backup JobId 1409,
Job=MBXDBA-FD.2007-05-28_04.30.00
28-May 06:18 bacula-sd: End of Volume "FullTa
In the last episode (May 19), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am trying to calculate how much of the space on my tape has been used.
>
> This is what I have done, and I want to make sure I barking up the
> right tree before going too far.
>
> Move the tape to the end of the data. (
I am trying to calculate how much of the space on my tape has been used.
This is what I have done, and I want to make sure I barking up the right
tree before going too far.
Move the tape to the end of the data. (mt eod).
Find the logical block location of the drive (mt rdspos).
/dev/nsa0
Well, I have had a Overland LoaderXpress DLT-1 that's been working fine
for many years. But, it seems the Benchmark DLT-1 tape drive in it has
finally given out.
Anyone have any ideas where one might get a refurbished or otherwise
working Benchmark DLT-1 tape drive that will fit into the Ove
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 06:47:23PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >From what I have read, I think the Ultrium tape drive is completely
> compatible with FreeBSD. If I am understanding the specs correctly, it
> uses hardware compression to compress data. And, again if I am
>
On Feb 21, 2007, at 10:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I have read, I think the Ultrium tape drive is completely
compatible with FreeBSD. If I am understanding the specs
correctly, it
uses hardware compression to compress data. And, again if I am
understanding everything correctly
>From what I have read, I think the Ultrium tape drive is completely
compatible with FreeBSD. If I am understanding the specs correctly, it
uses hardware compression to compress data. And, again if I am
understanding everything correctly, I should be able to use the mt command
to tell the t
Reuben A. Popp wrote:
> Does anyone know (or work with) if the LTO-3 tape drives from Quantum are
> supported? These are Ultra 160 SCSI drives as far as I know.
SCSI Tape drives are supported, yes. Bus speed, tape capacity,
manufacturer etc. doesn't really have a great deal of
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know (or work with) if the LTO-3 tape drives from Quantum are
supported? These are Ultra 160 SCSI drives as far as I know.
Thanks (again) in advance
Reuben A. Popp
--
Reuben A. Popp
Systems Administrator
Information Technology Department
East Central College
1
the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Thanks again for the responses. Before I bug scsi@, I have a little
more information now that might help. I'll try to keep it simple.
When using pax, both drives write more data and get further than before
with cpio. The DLT (which previously gave those SCSI
In the last episode (Dec 20), Mark Kane said:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006, at 23:16:45 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > Timeouts and unexpected busfree errors like these are indicative of
> > cabling or termination problems. I don't think DLTs auto-terminate,
> > for example, so try putting an external ter
-necessary hardware, use a minimal
hardware setup. You should also run diagnostics from the drive
manufacturer and verify the tape and drive. Last thing be sure to erase
the tape before testing it.
-Derek
At 02:09 AM 12/20/2006, Mark Kane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006, at 23:16:45 -0600,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006, at 23:16:45 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> Timeouts and unexpected busfree errors like these are indicative of
> cabling or termination problems. I don't think DLTs auto-terminate,
> for example, so try putting an external terminator on the 2nd plug on
> the back of the unit (or
That's hardware, most likely scsi termination issues or cabling issues.
I have seen these errors lots of times when using a high speed scsi
controller
on a tape drive. Sometimes you can play with the settings on the
controller or flip switches on the drive to get things to work, sometime
In the last episode (Dec 19), Mark Kane said:
> Hi everyone. I'm experiencing some problems with two tape drives
> attached to this machine. Here is the situation:
>
> I then tried backing up the same 17GB directory to a Sun DLT 4000
> single tape unit with a 20GB/40GB tape
Hi everyone. I'm experiencing some problems with two tape drives
attached to this machine. Here is the situation:
I first tried backing up 17GB of data using cpio to a six tape DDS-4
autoloader with a fresh 20GB/40GB Fuji tape. It stopped writing after
about 9GB and gave the following
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> While doing a backup on an HP Ultrium LTO1 tape, my ssh connection
>> froze, and since then, I'm not able to use the tape device anymore.
>
> Presumably there is another instance of dump or whatever is
> still running; try to kill -INT or ki
On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Philippe Lang wrote:
While doing a backup on an HP Ultrium LTO1 tape, my ssh connection
froze, and since then, I'm not able to use the tape device anymore.
Presumably there is another instance of dump or whatever is still
running; try to kill -INT or kill
Hi,
While doing a backup on an HP Ultrium LTO1 tape, my ssh connection froze, and
since then, I'm not able to use the tape device anymore.
xeon# mt -f /dev/nsa0 rewind
mt: /dev/nsa0: Device busy
xeon# dump -0uaL -f /dev/nsa0 /dev/da0s1a
DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Sep 27 23:
I use the ASCII headers for portability incase I need to restore to another
server with a different tar version.
-Derek
At 06:29 PM 7/25/2006, Jaime wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
Using tar with a SDLT I set the blocksize at 1024
and use ASCII headers (-c)
On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
Using tar with a SDLT I set the blocksize at 1024
and use ASCII headers (-c)
Thanks for the advice. I hadn't thought about block size. Why do
you use the ASCII headers?
Jaime
Using tar with a SDLT I set the blocksize at 1024
and use ASCII headers (-c)
-Derek
At 05:18 PM 7/24/2006, Jaime wrote:
I'm attempting to use tar to feed my filesystem(s) to a DLT tape
drive. I've done this with FreeBSD 3 through 5 and DAT (DDS-3 and
DDS-4) tapes
On Jul 24, 2006, at 10:23 PM, Micah wrote:
To save you some time, from my notes:
#finds all files modified before 1971
find / ! -newermt "1971-01-01 20:30"
I missed the part about "!" in the command. Thanks for the reply.
I would have been at this for at least an hour of, "What the heck?
Jaime wrote:
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Micah wrote:
I had the same problem recently and Google told me to look for files
with malformed dates. I used "find" to search for files dated before
Jan 1, 1970, and found one dated 1901. As soon as I "touch"ed the
problematic file, tar worked.
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Micah wrote:
I had the same problem recently and Google told me to look for
files with malformed dates. I used "find" to search for files dated
before Jan 1, 1970, and found one dated 1901. As soon as I
"touch"ed the problematic file, tar worked.
Many thanks.
Jaime wrote:
I'm attempting to use tar to feed my filesystem(s) to a DLT tape
drive. I've done this with FreeBSD 3 through 5 and DAT (DDS-3 and
DDS-4) tapes for years. The command now appears to work for a while and
then dies with this message about 2.5 hours into t
I'm attempting to use tar to feed my filesystem(s) to a DLT tape
drive. I've done this with FreeBSD 3 through 5 and DAT (DDS-3 and
DDS-4) tapes for years. The command now appears to work for a while
and then dies with this message about 2.5 hours into t
Hi people, i was installing FreeBSD 6-1, do the world stuff and all
that process, normally went my system is runnig i no more use the
sysinstall program.
Im going to test bacula 1.38.11 with the tape HP storageworks 232.
I was installing some ports that i going to test on this machine and
i
>
> Good morning all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions as to a tape backup solution
> that carries the most bang for the buck. The ideal would be:
>
> * LTO-3
> * Works with Bacula or similar and 6.x
> * Autochanger
> * Ability to handle
Good morning all,
I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions as to a tape backup solution
that carries the most bang for the buck. The ideal would be:
* LTO-3
* Works with Bacula or similar and 6.x
* Autochanger
* Ability to handle 30-40 heterogeneous servers of varying size
All
Nick wrote:
thanks for help Alex I found the best way for me to write info to the
tape.
Can You answered on the last question How can I see free size on the
tape or size what I filled?
My experience is that you can't really do either. If anyone know
better, I'd be glad to know
Çäðàâñòâóéòå, Alex.
Âû ïèñàëè 8 èþíÿ 2006 ã., 17:18:59:
> Nick wrote:
>>The tape is new and empty and I don't know what way is more likely for
>>me may be You can give me Your advice what way I should choose for
>>copy my information daily?
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Help please with connection sa0 devices.
>I try to make the following:
>mount/dev/sa0/mnt/type
>The system gives out:
>Block device required
>
>I can not understand that occurs. It is simple I the first time on
>FreeBS
Nick wrote:
Help please with connection sa0 devices.
I try to make the following:
mount/dev/sa0/mnt/type
The system gives out:
Block device required
A tape drive isn't mountable as a filesystem because it is not a block device,
ie, the tape drive is sequential access, not random access.
Nick wrote:
The tape is new and empty and I don't know what way is more likely for
me may be You can give me Your advice what way I should choose for
copy my information daily?
(You should copy freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org on your replies).
It depends. If you are just writing some
Nick wrote:
What is it you are actually trying to do? Read the tape? Write
something to it? Perform backups? Without that basic information it's
hard to actually help.
I try to build reserve copy of information on it actually I want read
and write information on it
And what form
Nick wrote:
Help please with connection sa0 devices.
I try to make the following:
mount/dev/sa0/mnt/type
The system gives out:
Block device required
I can not understand that occurs. It is simple I the first time on FreeBSD work with tape stores
Why are you trying to mount a tape as if it
Help please with connection sa0 devices.
I try to make the following:
mount/dev/sa0/mnt/type
The system gives out:
Block device required
I can not understand that occurs. It is simple I the first time on FreeBSD
work with tape stores
--
Nick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
Would I want if somebody has tested the HP
StorageWorks DAT 72 USB Tape Drive on the freeBSD
or something similar?
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Home.jsp?&lang=en&cc=us&prodTypeId=12169&prodSeriesId=501423&submit.y=0&submit.x=0&lang=en&cc
Graham Bentley said:
> Is there a way to create a hdd resore solution with
> set of boot floppies that will support my tape drive
> access the tape and restore the entire hard disc in
> case of disc failure disaster ? ie So I could install
> a new disc and be up and running wi
s that will support my tape drive
> access the tape and restore the entire hard disc in
> case of disc failure disaster ? ie So I could install
> a new disc and be up and running without doing any
> additional admin? I guess like a 'ghost' for scsi tape ?
>
> Any advice
Although my backup appears to work fine I get this in the
security log ...
+(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 16384-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer
+(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL. CDB: 1e 0 0 0 0 0
+(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
+(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): SCSI Status
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list.
I have a freebsd 6.1-RC1 machine that I am using to test bacula and
various tape drives. If the machine boots up while the tape drive is
attached and powered up, the tape drive is recognized. If I turn off the
tape drive and attach a different drive, I
Hello list.
I have a freebsd 6.1-RC1 machine that I am using to test bacula and
various tape drives. If the machine boots up while the tape drive is
attached and powered up, the tape drive is recognized. If I turn off the
tape drive and attach a different drive, I cannot seem to convince the OS
Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a SLR 100 tape drive (SCSI interface) and a tape cartridge with
> 4 files.
>
> The first file is damaged so I cannot mt fsf over that file to read
> the others.
>
> Is there a secret way to to advance the tape by a
Hi,
I have a SLR 100 tape drive (SCSI interface) and a tape cartridge with
4 files.
The first file is damaged so I cannot mt fsf over that file to read
the others.
Is there a secret way to to advance the tape by a certain number of
meters, or by a certain number of seconds or something. I know
>
> According to FAQ 4.3.3, SCSI tape drives are supported. I'm looking at
> getting a Dell PowerVault 124T Autoloader LTO-3 system.
>
> This product has an Ultra-2 SCSI interface, can I reasonably assume
> that I can run this machine via a FreeBSD system and it will work?
There shouldn't be any issues with it, bacula should do the trick nicely.
Mohan Singh wrote:
According to FAQ 4.3.3, SCSI tape drives are supported. I'm looking at
getting a Dell PowerVault 124T Autoloader LTO-3 system.
This product has an Ultra-2 SCSI interface, can I reasonably ass
According to FAQ 4.3.3, SCSI tape drives are supported. I'm looking at
getting a Dell PowerVault 124T Autoloader LTO-3 system.
This product has an Ultra-2 SCSI interface, can I reasonably assume
that I can run this machine via a FreeBSD system and it will work?
I am aware that I might
Graham Bentley wrote:
Is there a way to create a hdd resore solution with
set of boot floppies that will support my tape drive
access the tape and restore the entire hard disc in
case of disc failure disaster ? ie So I could install
a new disc and be up and running without doing any
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:09:40PM -, Graham Bentley wrote:
>
> Description: Glass bulb, similar to light bulb but with
> narrow end flared at bootom so it standsup. Inside,
> a rotating wire device that has 4 squares of card like
> material attached, like vanes.
>
> One one side they are
Is there a way to create a hdd resore solution with
set of boot floppies that will support my tape drive
access the tape and restore the entire hard disc in
case of disc failure disaster ? ie So I could install
a new disc and be up and running without doing any
additional admin? I guess like a
"Graham Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do you even know for sure that your backup was running at the
> > time that the filesystem full messages were generated?
>
> Unfortunatly not - the times are different so this could two
> unrelated issues.
That's exactly the point.
> > Maybe.
Thanks for the reply Lowell.
> Are you just guessing here, or do you have a reason to think this is
> happening?
Not sure what you mean? I cut and paste the logs so clearly
there is something happening i.e. a reason for those messages?
> A quick look at flexbackup makes me think that it uses
> v
"Graham Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can any one comment on the below ;
>
> candle# df -H
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s1a260M 37M202M15%/
> devfs 1.0k1.0k 0B 100%/dev
> /dev/ar0s1d116G 96G 1
Hi All,
Can any one comment on the below ;
candle# df -H
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a260M 37M202M15%/
devfs 1.0k1.0k 0B 100%/dev
/dev/ar0s1d116G 96G 11G90%/data
/dev/ad0s1e260M 29k2
Compaq had a lot of problems getting the windows ida driver to work
with tape drives, as a matter of fact, and still won't guarentee it
unless it's a compaq tape drive that was specifically sold with the
server originally.
We have lots of Compaq servers with tape drives, none of the t
d by the BIOS as
the machine boots) tape drive. I need to use it, but can find
no evidence of this hardware in the dmesg output. I've googled
around and really all I can locate are references to CAM, the
aacp driver compiled in the kernel, and device.hints. Can
someone put this all together for m
Hi All,
I'm re-posting and re-framing this problem somewhat...
I'm running several Compaq Proliant DL360 servers, all with FBSD
6.0-RELEASE.
One of these has an internal Quantum DLT 4000 (that's how the
BIOS identifies it -- I am seeing the drive ID'd by the BIOS as
the
>
> Hi i want to know is someone of you knows about some links where i
> can find some how-to use tapes drivers(scsi), thanks people.
>
> I try the man page, but get how to play with my tape...
What sort of 'playing' do you want to do?
If you just want to write to
Hi i want to know is someone of you knows about some links where i
can find some how-to use tapes drivers(scsi), thanks people.
I try the man page, but get how to play with my tape...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
101 - 200 of 493 matches
Mail list logo
