I've just noticed that for the last month Exim does not appear to have been
using SpamAssassin to check incoming emails.
Previously all my incoming emails contained the following headers:
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From:
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:
Bu
So true. I have processed as you suggested and will follow that + the
UPDATING suggestion as well in future.
Just got on wrong track that this scenario should be used with 5.14 to
5.14.x as well.
FYI:
After running
sa-update -D
sa-update --nogpg
spamassassin --lint -D
freshclam
I got at the
So true. I have processed as you suggested and will follow that + the
UPDATING suggestion as well in future.
Just got on wrong track that this scenario should be used with 5.14 to
5.14.x as well.
FYI:
After running
sa-update -D
sa-update --nogpg
spamassassin --lint -D
freshclam
I got at the
1/mach
>>> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1) at /usr/local/bin/sa-update line 80.
>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/bin/sa-update line 80.
>>>
>>> Can't locate NetAddr/IP.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
>>> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_p
te_perl/5.14.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1/mach
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
Compilation failed in requir
On 23 Jun 2011, at 21:37, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
>>> anymore.
>>> Can someone hint me how to solve this?
>
> You need to reinstall all perl modules if you upgrade perl from 5.1
On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
>> anymore.
>> Can someone hint me how to solve this?
You need to reinstall all perl modules if you upgrade perl from 5.10.x
or 5.12.x to 5.14.1. This is explained in UPDATING.
If
rl5/5.14.1/BSDPAN
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.1/mach
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1/mach
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1) at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
>
> BEGIN failed--compilatio
rl5/5.14.1) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/NetSet.pm line 25.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Co
This is the other question: how do I get the builtin SpanAssassin
working? sendmail is working and I've built mail/p5-SpamAssassin
[or whatever]. Still getting spam. Also, when /etc/mail/* starts
up, on the console I notice a warning saying something like
Can't find Xspamassassin
2010/11/17 AN :
> I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with Spamassassin
> and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it is being delivered
> to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some good documentation to
> configure mail marked as spam to
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:42:51 + (UTC)
AN wrote:
> I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with
> Spamassassin and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it
> is being delivered to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some
> good documentation to co
I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with Spamassassin
and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it is being
delivered to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some good
documentation to configure mail marked as spam to a different directory.
Are there any
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Since the update of SpamAssassin to 3.3.0, spamd doesn't start anymore and
exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of a
PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems
Hi,
Since the update of SpamAssassin to 3.3.0, spamd doesn't start anymore
and exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of
a PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems that after the upgrade, sa-update has to b
Matthew Seaman wrote:
I'll add your patches and post an updated shar later on.
Done.
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Matt Emmerton wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile="YES"}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires devel/re2c,
which
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
There's a .shar of the new port at:
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile="YES"}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires devel/re2c,
which is an optional depende
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
> I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile="YES"}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires devel/re2c,
which is an optional depen
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> There's a .shar of the new port at:
>
> http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
>
> Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
> send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks great to me. I
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
one
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:19:55 -0500
Jerry wrote:
> There is an apparent bug in 'spamassassin' regarding 2010 e-mails. The
> full story is available here:
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/.
>
> There is also a discussion of it on SlashDot:
>
> http://it.s
There is an apparent bug in 'spamassassin' regarding 2010 e-mails. The
full story is available here:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/.
There is also a discussion of it on SlashDot:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/01/02/0027207/SpamAssassin-2010-Bug
--
Jerry
ges...
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
one script required, which
On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:45 AM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> However, neither of these have been accepted by the
>> p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
>
> It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> However, neither of these have been accepted by the
> p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which
channels you use and whether you want sa-compile (which isn
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin
from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said
"yes"), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find
nor in /etc/periodic or /usr/local/etc/periodic.
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:05:59 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing
> SpamAssassin from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do
> this (I said "yes"), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab
> I can f
sa-update.
Great.
How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin from
ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said "yes"), but I
don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find nor in /etc/periodic or
/usr/local/etc/periodi
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> There is discussion on the SA mailing list, and it is likely that
> some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who
> use sa-update.
It's already available in sa-update.
___
I've submitted a PR for this, but email administrators who use SpamAssassin may
wish to take immediate action.
There is a SpamAssassin rule which treats messages with dates after 2009 as
"far in the future". This adds about 3 points to the SA score, so is very
substantia
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:30:47 +
Marwan Sultan wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
>
>
> Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
>
> I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
>
> I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
>
>
If you run
e your webmail or other client generate seperate whitelists as
you
describe here, but the auto_whitelist file really is maintained by SA only, and
it's
in Berkeley DB format.
Here's how it works:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
Ruben
Hi Gary,
> just to be complete++, :-), you mean
> /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> , is this correct??
Yes, You are 100% Correct :)
> would you check my tying to see if i've made any mistakes?
Again, Correct :)
> another question: are these the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:30:47AM +, Marwan Sultan wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
>
>
> Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
>
> I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
>
> I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
>
Gary,
Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
in your local.cf
add the lines
auto_whitelist_path /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
bayes_path /var/spool
Guys,
my network guy suggests this is ONE way of creating a
.spamassassin file. Is there a better way than this:
mkdir /root/.spamassassin
chmod 775 /root/.spamassassin
chown root:spamd /root/.spamassassin
what's the consensus,
>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:21:53 -0800,
>> Andrew Moran said:
A> Thank you for your suggestion. I'll try compiling Perl and it's
A> dependencies without using PERL_MALLOC.
I've had similar memory problems using Hyperestraier to index
collections exceeding 1,000,000 documents. The indexer
~]# limits -H -d
Resource limits (current):
datasize 8388608 kB
[r...@celebrian ~]#
I rebooted, but still see my memory being chewed up. Almost
immediately after booting, one of my spamassassin processes spun out
of control. Here's the top with it eating 16 gigs of memory:
PID
;t sysctls, as
> > this one doesn't seem to be:
> >
> > celebrian# sysctl -a | grep kern.maxdsiz
> > celebrian# sysctl -a | grep kern.defdsiz
> > celebrian#
>
> Ok sadly that didn't seem to do much:
>
> celebrian# cat /boot/loader.conf
> kern.maxdsiz=
m to do much:
celebrian# cat /boot/loader.conf
kern.maxdsiz="8G"
kern.defdsiz="4G"
celebrian#
I rebooted, but still see my memory being chewed up. Almost
immediately after booting, one of my spamassassin processes spun out
of control. Here's the top with it eati
In Mar 3, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Mel wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
with
kern.maxdsiz loader tuneable?
If so, set it lower, so you can at least have the machine in a
usable state at
all times. 4G shoul
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
> > What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
> > with
> > kern.maxdsiz loader tuneable?
> > If so, set it lower, so you can at least have the machine in a
> > usable state at
> > all times. 4G should be enough for any
On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Mel wrote:
This is hard to debug, but I'd first toggle the PERL_MALLOC option
in the
configuration dialog for the perl port. If this doesn't solve the
problem,
then you'd have to get a ktrace to get some indication of what is
allocating
the memory.
Thank yo
ro/ports), but I'm still having memory issues.
>
> My current one is that SpamAssassin seems to be periodically eating
> up all my memory, causing the server to slow to a crawl until the
> kernel kills the process and then I have enormous amounts of free
> memory. Rinse, repeat.
Andrew Moran wrote:
[...]
> Has anyone heard of this? Or any pointers on what I can do to figure
> out what is causing it?
>
> Your advice is much appreciated.
As an alternative:
You could try mail/mimedefang. It calls spamassassin to evaluate an
e-mail but without having it
that SpamAssassin seems to be periodically eating
up all my memory, causing the server to slow to a crawl until the
kernel kills the process and then I have enormous amounts of free
memory. Rinse, repeat. I thought maybe it had something to do with
the fact that I was using multithreaded
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:58:37 -0800
Tankko wrote:
> I am having problems up grading SpamAssassin. The get the following
> errors when I do portupgrade. I hand corrected the first error by
> following the instructions listed below, then this error showed.
> Before I go though and
> Same issue, different package. Apparently perl-after-upgrade didn't do it's
> job.
> I would:
> portupgrade -f p5-*
>
> Then go back to upgrade spamassasin.
> --
> Mel
OK, this solved the problem. Everything upgrades fine now. Thank
you very much for all your help. Not sure why this happened
-DNS.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To un
he pkg-plist for p5-Socket6 is broken. Either way a
> > send-pr(1) is needed.
> >
> > If the output is anything else, please list here.
>
> I ran the grep, and it did come back with site_perl/5.8.8, so I ran:
>
> pkg_delete -f p5-Socket6-*
> pkgdb -F
> portupgrade
ything else, please list here.
>
I ran the grep, and it did come back with site_perl/5.8.8, so I ran:
pkg_delete -f p5-Socket6-*
pkgdb -F
portupgrade p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
and I get the following errors:
---cut---
Writing Makefile for IO::Socket::INET6
===> Building for p5-IO-Socket-INET6-2.
On Monday 16 February 2009 10:04:43 Tankko wrote:
> > We need the line that says:
> > ===> p5-IO-INET6 depends on file
> >
> > That line is probably faulty.
>
> This is the closest thing I can find to p5-IO-INET6 in the build output.
>
> ===> Installing for p5-Net-DNS-0.65
> ===> p5-Net-DNS-0.
>
> We need the line that says:
> ===> p5-IO-INET6 depends on file
>
> That line is probably faulty.
This is the closest thing I can find to p5-IO-INET6 in the build output.
===> Installing for p5-Net-DNS-0.65
===> p5-Net-DNS-0.65 depends on executable: ipcount - found
===> p5-Net-DNS-0.65
On Monday 16 February 2009 08:58:37 Tankko wrote:
> I am having problems up grading SpamAssassin. The get the following
> errors when I do portupgrade. I hand corrected the first error by
> following the instructions listed below, then this error showed.
> Before I go though and
I am having problems up grading SpamAssassin. The get the following
errors when I do portupgrade. I hand corrected the first error by
following the instructions listed below, then this error showed.
Before I go though and hand correct these one by one, I thought I'd
ask if I was doing some
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:27:01 +
RW wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:43:21 -0500
> David Banning wrote:
>
> > After some upgrades, all mail arriving via sendmail-provmail is
> > empty - when I actually deinstall spamassassin - the mail starts
> > arriving again.
>
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:43:21 -0500
David Banning wrote:
> After some upgrades, all mail arriving via sendmail-provmail is
> empty - when I actually deinstall spamassassin - the mail starts
> arriving again.
>
> I haven't seen posts on this topic - I wonder if anyone has a gu
After some upgrades, all mail arriving via sendmail-provmail is
empty - when I actually deinstall spamassassin - the mail starts
arriving again.
I haven't seen posts on this topic - I wonder if anyone has a guess as to
where to look for answers on this.
I am guessing if there is some w
Tom Stuart wrote:
Hello, I just installed SpamAssassin on FreeBSD 7.1 and am
encountering an error with autolearn. It always says failed when
attempting to learn.
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
___
freebsd-questions
Hello, I just installed SpamAssassin on FreeBSD 7.1 and am
encountering an error with autolearn. It always says failed when
attempting to learn. I followed the documentation for setting it up
but I'm wondering if I missed something. Possibly the Bayes DB was not
created? Or is this someth
That says you are driving spamd into swapping. The two canonical
reasons for SpamAssassin to be really slow are dead BL sites or
overrunning memory and going into heavy swapping. You made a
change to reduce the amount of swapping. Hence you probably have
too many children at any one time.
Modify
Hi James,
I remove spamc on .procmailrc and I can see lots of improvements!
Thanx,
alyd
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, James Tanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: James Tanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:07
thnx Philip, your config will help in my current setup.
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, Philip M. Gollucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Philip M. Gollucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: "James Tanis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], f
James Tanis wrote:
"lyd mc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
.. ..
I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my mail users and it goes
like
this:
The following setup by the front line mx&#
"lyd mc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What causes spamassassin to slow?
>
> Here is my config:
>
> snippet from sendmail.mc
> .. ..
>
> I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my mail users and it goes
like
> this:
So if I'm unde
PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:08 AM
"lyd mc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What causes spamassassin to slow?
>
> Here is my config:
>
> snippet from sendmail.mc
Thanks edwin. I better watch those dns rbl feature..
Regards,
alyd
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Spamassassin very slow
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Cc: "lyd mc" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> iLast day my mail server became very slow. I haven't found any
> mysterious errors/warnings in /var/log/message and maillog. When I
> disable spammilter in sendmail it became fast.
Normally this happens to me when I a DNS based RBL suddenly goes
out of action.
I know it won't solve your problem
Hi guys,
Last day my mail server became very slow. I haven't found any mysterious
errors/warnings in /var/log/message and maillog. When I disable spammilter in
sendmail it became fast.
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
FE
Robert Davison wrote:
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from
the ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or
the p5-Mail SpamAssassin plug-in. They b
:10 PM
4/11/2008, Robert Davison wrote:
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the
ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the
p5-Mail Spam
7;m running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the p5-Mail
SpamAssassin plug-in. They both do the same, but is one a
At 04:10 PM 4/11/2008, Robert Davison wrote:
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the
ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the
p5-Mail Sp
I'm running the base Sendmail with Mailscanner and SpamAssassin from the ports.
A simple question
I'm installing SPF to help the fight against spam.
Which is the most efficient way of doing it.Sendmail milter or the p5-Mail
SpamAssassin plug-in. They both do the same, bu
g mail.
I installed the spamassassin and new-amavisd port, set the basic
configuration options, turned them on, and it doesn't seem to do anything.
My "test" has been to tell it to tag messages even with a threshold of
zero, and nothing is ever tagged.
Has anyone got a walk through or good
I've got a very plain and standard sendmail configuration running on a
machine as a primary mail exchanger. After years of running without any
kind of automated spam filtering, it's just gotten too poor and I have
to turn to rejecting mail.
I installed the spamassassin and new-amavisd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> Matthew Seaman a écrit :
>> You'll need to install the same version of Berkeley DB on FreeBSD as
>> you were
>> using on Debian -- and you'll have to compile the perl modules
>>
Matthew Seaman a écrit :
You'll need to install the same version of Berkeley DB on FreeBSD as you were
using on Debian -- and you'll have to compile the perl modules SpamAssassin
uses for BerkeleyDB access to use that version too.
I use the same BerkeleyDB. I use db41 on FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> However, when I use these files in my ~/.spamassassin, on my FreeBSD, I
> have errors:
>
> spamd[51854]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
> /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed
Hello,
I must export a SpamAssassin configuration in a GNU/Linux Debian 4.0.
See these files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .spamassassin # file *
auto-whitelist: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order)
auto-whitelist.mutex: ASCII text
bayes_journal:ASCII text
bayes.mutex
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8: Undefined symbol
> "PL_exit_flags"
You may consider updating every Perl modules after you have upgraded
Perl 5.8.8.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hey Drew!
I learned long time ago to drop SpamAssassin altogether. I got hundreds of spam
e-mails a day with SpamAssassin.
But when I switched to a clean Postfix installation with Greylist (port 10023)
and 3 different blocklist servers, my spams reduced to 0 a day, or 1-3 at most.
$ cat /usr
eems to be with spamassassin.
When I run spamassassin -D --lint from the command line, everything _seems_
to check out. However, when I run mailscanner --lint it segfaults:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](/)# mailscanner --lint
Checking version numbers...
Version number in MailScanner.conf (4.64.3) is
PROTECTED]> for root:65534
> Jan 31 17:21:42 acsvfbsd02 spamd[53289]: auto-whitelist: open of
> auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
> /nonexistent/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.acsvfbsd02.acutronic.ch.53289
> for /nonexistent//.spamassa
failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
/nonexistent/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.acsvfbsd02.acutronic.ch.53289
for /nonexistent//.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: No such file or directory
Jan 31 17:21:42 acsvfbsd02 spamd[53289]: spamd: clean message (0.0/7.0) for
root:65534
On 8/25/07, Eric Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 11:26 PMAug 24, 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > an easier way is to run spamassassin under the control of amavisd-new
> > and let amavisd-new add address extensions such as user+spa
On Aug 24, 2007, at 11:26 PMAug 24, 2007, Noel Jones wrote:
[snip]
an easier way is to run spamassassin under the control of amavisd-new
and let amavisd-new add address extensions such as user+spam and to
let dovecot file the mail in a spam folder.
Noel,
Are you saying I just need amavisd
tfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm looking
> > for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets, so that I
> > can route any messages tagged as Spam to a Spam directory with a users
> > maildir.
>
> Assuming you got SA running:
> In my main.
Eric Crist wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:05 AMAug 24, 2007, Gerard wrote:
>
>> On August 24, 2007 at 09:32AM Eric Crist wrote:
>>
>>
>
> I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm looking
> for is some filtering based on the fla
On August 24, 2007 at 10:34AM Eric Crist wrote:
{snip]
> I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm
> looking for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets,
> so that I can route any messages tagged as Spam to a Spam directory
>
--On Friday, August 24, 2007 09:46:32 -0500 Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Eric Crist wrote:
This is also a reply to Paul Schmehl.
I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm looking
for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets, so that
Eric Crist wrote:
This is also a reply to Paul Schmehl.
I've got Postfix with Dovecot and virtual users setup. What I'm looking
for is some filtering based on the flags SpamAssassin sets, so that I
can route any messages tagged as Spam to a Spam directory with a users
maildir. I
On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:05 AMAug 24, 2007, Gerard wrote:
On August 24, 2007 at 09:32AM Eric Crist wrote:
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
Define "funky"!
Before y
On Aug 24, 2007, at 8:46 AMAug 24, 2007, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Eric
why not stick with an MTA you know?
Martin,
I've switched to postfix due to some of the features it supports.
Thanks for your concern, though.
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks
On August 24, 2007 at 09:32AM Eric Crist wrote:
> Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
> and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
> lacking.
Define "funky"!
Before you start asking questions regarding confi
Hey,
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
TIA for any help!
-
Eric F Crist
Secure Computing Networks
___
freebsd-ques
--On August 24, 2007 8:32:01 AM -0500 Eric Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hey,
Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
lacking.
TIA for any help!
What is it that you want to do?
P
Eric
why not stick with an MTA you know?
--
martin
On 8/24/07, Eric Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> Is there anyone that can help me do some funky filtering with postfix
> and spamassassin? I'm a new Postfix convert, and my knowledge is
>
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
