is mount_smbfs, smbutil and friends part of base system? this is FreeBSD amd64
9.1-RELEASE
then what is extra in samba port?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
El día Saturday, June 01, 2013 a las 02:09:58AM +0800, Quark escribió:
is mount_smbfs, smbutil and friends part of base system? this is FreeBSD
amd64 9.1-RELEASE
$ which mount_smbfs
/usr/sbin/mount_smbfs
$ which smbutil
/usr/bin/smbutil
then what is extra in samba port?
a SMB client
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2013 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: mount_smbfs in base?
El día Saturday, June 01, 2013 a las 02:09:58AM +0800, Quark escribió:
is mount_smbfs, smbutil
?
Yes.
I 'guess' samba was GPL, is it OK to let live GPL s/w in base when such
strides are being attempted to oust GCC?
mount_smbfs isn't GPL.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 11/03/10 00:04, Bartosz Stec wrote:
Hi,
Hello!
I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to
the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a
remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs:
mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //peo
Hi,
Hello!
I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to
the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a
remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs:
mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //peo at mars
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hi,
I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to
the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a
remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs:
mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //p...@mars/inter /home/mnt
Password:
mount_smbfs
On 10/31/10 14:06, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing a major overhaul of our Samba servers including an upgrade to
the latest port version, 3.5.6. I'm getting most things in place but a
remaining problem is that I cannot any longer use mount_smbfs:
mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.8 //p...@mars
Connecting to 193.196.65.128 at port 139
...
Another side effect is that I don't have to use the -I parameter any
more the smbclient command gets conveniently short:
smbclient -U user%pass //ADS/DFS
smb: \
Unfortunately this mount_smbfs appears not to use hostname
resolution, all that I get from
know what the
trigger was that caused them to first fail).
Now, when the script is run, it gives the following error when mounting
the shares:
mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device)
Which is strange, as there are (by last count) 1170 /dev/nsmb* devices
in /dev
,
rsyncs them to a local directory and unmounts again.
This used to run fine till a few months ago (I don't know what the
trigger was that caused them to first fail).
Now, when the script is run, it gives the following error when
mounting the shares:
mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester
Could you post the script? Anything else would be pure guess work. You
Well, I can recreate it with something as simple as:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
mount_smbfs //u...@remotehost/share1/ /tmp/mnt/
mount_smbfs //u...@remotehost/share2/ /tmp/mnt2/
also might consider posting this on the BASH
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:02:35 +0200, Bernard Scharp
freebsd-questi...@itsacon.net wrote:
Could you post the script? Anything else would be pure guess work. You
Well, I can recreate it with something as simple as:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
mount_smbfs //u...@remotehost/share1/ /tmp/mnt
On 02/09/2010 15:29, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:02:35 +0200, Bernard Scharp
freebsd-questi...@itsacon.net wrote:
Could you post the script? Anything else would be pure guess work. You
Well, I can recreate it with something as simple as:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
mount_smbfs
in /dev/ is a level of FreeBSD
I'm not familiar with)
Yes, I would guess so. The content of /dev/ is dynamically generated
since FreeBSD 5, if I remember correctly. As the nsmb nodes don't
seem to be in use any longer, it would be no problem to remove
them. The mount_smbfs program will generate
Sorry for the necro post..
but the source on mount_smbfs definitely has kerberos options..
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/smb/smb-431.2/mount_smbfs/mount_smbfs.c
mount_smbfs on OSX seems to have Kerberos support, does mount_smbfs on
FreeBSD support Kerberos?
No, but if it's
Hi guys,
I use mount_smbfs on my notebook and I have a little nasty problem..
Sometimes I have kernel panic when resuming after the suspend. The
issue seems to happen when I go to suspend with my USB network (WiFi)
adapter plugged in (I do use /etc/rc.d/netif stop rum0 before going
to suspend
mount_smbfs on OSX seems to have Kerberos support, does mount_smbfs on
FreeBSD support Kerberos?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to mount drives on an Active Directory 2003 domain? I've
been doing some testing, and I had no problem mounting the netlogon share,
but I get an authentication error when I try to mount other drives. (I've
altered the hostnames in the examples below.)
# mount_smbfs -I domain
mount_smbfs -E UTF-8:UTF-8 //server/path /mnt/tmp
UTF-8 filenames do not show up at all on the FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE client.
They show up just fine using smbclient and mounted as nfs, files also
show up fine on Windows clients.
Is there a limitation with smbfs in handling UTF-8 samba mounts
. D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59 2007
.. D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59 2007
55750 blocks of size 8388608. 55498 blocks available
BUT
BUT
mount_smbfs -W Riderway -I A.B.C.D //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/unix /x1/backups-cdp
Pack 2]
Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2]
smb: \ ls
. D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59
2007 .. D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59
2007
55750 blocks of size 8388608. 55498 blocks available
BUT
BUT
mount_smbfs
of size 8388608. 55498 blocks available
BUT
BUT
mount_smbfs -W Riderway -I A.B.C.D //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/unix
/x1/backups-cdp Password:
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection refused
The share is valid, I can even write to it via smbclient.
Does any one have any
I hate not remembering things, so I just verified this on a Windows Server
2003 box I have access to. This feature (listening on port 139) is tied to
NETBIOS over TCP/IP. Make sure it's enabled on the WINS tab of the Advanced
TCP/IP settings dialog for the interface.
BRILLIANT!
Thats the one!
there files.
Can I do something to mount them UNIX-UNIX?
I have tried to mounting with mount_smbfs because the files are in a Samba
share, but when i use cp to backup files to my Fsbd box i get many page
errors and timeout. So i dont trust mount_smbfs too much.
A solution for this?
My actual solution
.
What I try is to mount them in order to backup there files.
Can I do something to mount them UNIX-UNIX?
I have tried to mounting with mount_smbfs because the files are in a Samba
share, but when i use cp to backup files to my Fsbd box i get many page
errors and timeout. So i dont trust mount_smbfs
Scott D Friedemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #0
I have run mount_smbfs for the last couple years without incident.
Now I find the command no longer works, but gives this error.
mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.100 //drogo/c /mnt/bsdstuff
Password
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I tracked it as far as an ioctl call for creating what looks like a
protocol block. I don't have the time to trace into the kernel right
now, and it doesn't look like anything in the smbtools userland has
changed in quite a while.
Can we assume that you checked the
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #0
I have run mount_smbfs for the last couple years without incident. Now
I find the command no longer works, but gives this error.
mount_smbfs -I 192.168.1.100 //drogo/c /mnt/bsdstuff
Password:
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr
what it should
be looking like if the convertion is
done)
Actually I have never succesfully done charset convertion with mount_smbfs,
what did I do wrong? -E parameter which
should convert GB18030 folder names to UTF-8 but actually no convertion is done
(see the ls | iconv which shows what
Running mount_smbfs as a regular user generates a permission
denial in relation to iconv in the kernel.
This is apparently a well known problem which can be circumvented
by setting the set-user-id-on-execution bit for mount_smbfs.
This works for me but leads to the problem that the mount is now
The right stuff:
sudo mount_smbfs -I server name NOT ip - don't ask me why, I don't
know -W workgroup/domain name -d 550 -f 550 //myusername@server
name NOT ip - I can answer this if you don't know and ask me
why/share mount point
That's about it.
On 8/30/06, Antony Mawer [EMAIL PROTECTED
experience with this:
1) I can mount_smbfs shares on my windows desktop at home
2) People here can mount drives on the celerra box from Windows and Linux
3) Every time I try to map a share from FreeBSD, I get the error:
mount_smbfs: unable to
open connection: resource temporarily unavailable
And no, I
the two, and I was wondering if anyone here
has had previous experience with this:
1) I can mount_smbfs shares on my windows desktop at home
2) People here can mount drives on the celerra box from Windows and Linux
3) Every time I try to map a share from FreeBSD, I get the error:
mount_smbfs: unable
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:28:46 -0500
Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
Do you know if they ever fix crypto bug in mount_smbfs in FreeBSD 6.1?
Yeah, they did... Assuming you're thinking of the same thing I
am, whereby attempting to authenticate to a server for SMB
access resulted
Hi!
Are there any mechanism to lock files (as the Win-clients), shared by
a Windows-server, and reached on a smbfs-mounted file system? I haven'
found any mount options in mount_smbfs's manual.
Bye,
Gábor
--
#!/bin/ksh
Z='21N16I25C25E30, 40M30E33E25T15U!';IFS=' ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
/msg00556.html
I now need to add
options NETSMBCRYPTO
To my kernel config to get encryption support added for mount_smbfs?
I am currently running a generic kernel and I have never needed to do this
in the past just to mount a windows share. Has something changed recently
and I will need to do
/FreeBSD/stable/2006-02/msg00556.html
I now need to add
options NETSMBCRYPTO
To my kernel config to get encryption support added for mount_smbfs?
Yes. That will fix it.
I am currently running a generic kernel and I have never needed to do this
in the past just to mount a windows share. Has
Hello all,
I have the smbfs performance problem while connecting to the Windows
(w2k3) share in the AD environment, wint 6.1-PRERELEASE - with the
filesystem mounted through mount_smbfs i get 300-350 kBps (kiloBytes
per sec) speed, while through the smbclient i get the speeds in excess
Hi,
I had my kernel built with the following options
options NETSMB #SMB/CIFS requester
options NETSMBCRYPTO#encrypted password support for SMB
which I understand adds the support for smbfs into the kernel itself.
BUT when using either mount -t smbfs
fail.
I commented out those 2 options *only* and everything works fine again.
What gives?
Beto
Sorry, forgot to include version info.
Freebsd 6.0 Stable, built on Jan 30th 06.
world built on Jan 31st , src/contrib/smbfs/mount_smbfs/mount_smbfs.c,v
1.5 2004/09/05 06:42
Beto
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:10:01PM -0500, Incoming Mail List wrote:
I've got a problem with file names containing : and ? characters when
mounted via mount_smbfs. I have two FBSD machines running SAMBA. Machine-1
mounts a file system from Machine-2 using mount_smbfs(). The ls() command
I've got a problem with file names containing : and ? characters when
mounted via mount_smbfs. I have two FBSD machines running SAMBA. Machine-1
mounts a file system from Machine-2 using mount_smbfs(). The ls() command
converts a file name such as XX:YY to something like X~Y. If I run tar
~/ShareDir has rwx permissions for ugo.
sudo mount_smbfs -N -I dodo -u me -g ggg //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/SharedDir
~/SharedDir
# directory/file structure is correct
ls -FCR SharedDir/
DirOne/ DirThree/ DirTwo/
SharedDir/DirOne:
DSCN1090.JPG* DSCN1091.JPG* DSCN1092.JPG*
SharedDir/DirThree
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:39:58 -0500, jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John DeStefano wrote:
I get the following error when I try to mount_smbfs a LAN file share
as root with 5.3-RELEASE and a GENERIC kernel, both cvsup-ed and
compiled this past weekend:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:47:44 -0500, John DeStefano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:39:58 -0500, jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John DeStefano wrote:
I get the following error when I try to mount_smbfs a LAN file share
as root with 5.3-RELEASE and a GENERIC kernel
John DeStefano wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:39:58 -0500, jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John DeStefano wrote:
I get the following error when I try to mount_smbfs a LAN file share
as root with 5.3-RELEASE and a GENERIC kernel, both cvsup-ed and
compiled this past weekend:
/usr
John DeStefano wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:47:44 -0500, John DeStefano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:39:58 -0500, jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John DeStefano wrote:
I get the following error when I try to mount_smbfs a LAN file share
as root with 5.3
I get the following error when I try to mount_smbfs a LAN file share
as root with 5.3-RELEASE and a GENERIC kernel, both cvsup-ed and
compiled this past weekend:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: mount_smbfs: Undefined symbol vfsisloadable
I can't find a whole lot of information about this error
John DeStefano wrote:
I get the following error when I try to mount_smbfs a LAN file share
as root with 5.3-RELEASE and a GENERIC kernel, both cvsup-ed and
compiled this past weekend:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: mount_smbfs: Undefined symbol vfsisloadable
I can't find a whole lot of information
I have a box running 4.5. I try to execute the mount_smbfs I get
mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device).
When I do an ls of the /dev directory I see the following devices:
/dev/nsmb0
/dev/smb0
/dev/smb1
Anyone seen this before?
Ray
Petre Bandac wrote:
I can't make mount_smbfs to work with the -N switch (ie read its
passwords from ~/.nsmbrc)
sudo mount_smbfs -I IP-address //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/share /mnt/share
works
while
sudo mount_smbfs -N -I IP-address //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/share /mnt/share
gives
mount_smbfs: unable to open
I can't make mount_smbfs to work with the -N switch (ie read its
passwords from ~/.nsmbrc)
sudo mount_smbfs -I IP-address //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/share /mnt/share
works
while
sudo mount_smbfs -N -I IP-address //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/share /mnt/share
gives
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:41:24 +0100, Axel S. Gruner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I run into a problem with mount_smbfs.
Trying to mount a SMB-share on a AS/400 from a FreeBSD 4.10 or FreeBSD
5.3-RC1 gives me the error:
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection reset
Hi Nelis!
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004, Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
You have to use the netbios name of your samba server. Change
10.4.1.222 to the netbios name.
mount_smbfs -I 10.4.1.222 //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sfimages /mnt
or
mount_smbfs -I suedzwo.suedfac.com //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sfimages /mnt
Thanks
Hi.
I run into a problem with mount_smbfs.
Trying to mount a SMB-share on a AS/400 from a FreeBSD 4.10 or FreeBSD
5.3-RC1 gives me the error:
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection reset by
peer
Well, i dont like Mr. Peer, and, trying to reach the SMB-share via
smbclient
Not sure about right ML (maybe fs@), feel free to forward to another
one if needed. And please Cc: me.
Background:
- I need to syncronize two dir hosted on win machines based on data
contained into an Oracle DB (direction of copy may change based on
owner of file as specified into the DB).
(in the case of ufs) to return an error when the file system
is already mounted.
Is there a technical requirement, or benefit, for allowing multiple
smbfs mounts of a windows share on the same mount point?
--
The mount_smbfs(8) command on 5.2.1 allows multiple mounts using
The mount_smbfs(8) command on 5.2.1 allows multiple mounts using the same
source and mount point. This sounds like a bug to me since other file
systems such as ufs return an error on such attempts. Anyone know of a
reason why this is allowed in mount_smbfs?
J
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, jon wrote:
The mount_smbfs(8) command on 5.2.1 allows multiple mounts using the same
source and mount point. This sounds like a bug to me since other file
systems such as ufs return an error on such attempts. Anyone know of a
reason why this is allowed in mount_smbfs
Hi all,
I'm making a backup server that needs to copy files from win2k servers
using mount_smbfs. Everything is working fine, except for files that
contain the '¤' (euro) symbol. It seems that cp doesn't like this, and
changes it in a question mark and the file will not be copied. Any
ideas
I have a samba share mounted with mount_smbfs.
Afterwards if I open a file on this share from
another client, I got permission denied on my
own until I close this file on the other client.
I have checked the smbstatus on the server and
got result with deny_none and no oplocks ...
Also meanwhile
oh one more thing: smbclient works fine
so during the file is open by another
client I got permission denied if I
would like to access the file through
the mounted dir, and from smbclient
I can get the file without errors on
the same machine ...
--
_(_)_
(_. o_)F3CZ0
(_,)
I have a Windows 2003 machine(2) with a share mounted on a Freebsd
machine (1) via mount_smbfs
Hardware
Machine 1
FreeBSD pcmarpxy.mine.nu 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #1: Fri Jan 30
23:33:38 CET 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MARK
i386
PIII 650, 392mb ram
system : ata-100
?
mount_smbfs -I ip address of the machine that has the share
//username@net bios name/share name /mnt
for username I have tried: the domain/username and just the username bare. I
get the same results.
Thanks,
Brian
_
Check out
. Any thoughts?
mount_smbfs -I ip address of the machine that has the share
//username@net bios name/share name /mnt
for username I have tried: the domain/username and just the username
bare. I get the same results.
Thanks,
Brian
I had the same problem. Using the -W domain name option
Hi,
I'm running 4.8-RELEASE on a box that, daily, connects to a windows machine
and writes files to a share.
This system was working for about a month. But now, every time I issue the mount_smbfs
command I get
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = RPC struct is bad
In /var
Maybe your Google is broken. =) The string mount_smbfs: unable to
open connection: syserr = RPC struct is bad returned ten or so relevant
results including...
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg41941.html
Looks as though the Windoze user that you are connecting with has
Hi folks,
I'm using SMBFS on FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE from 2003-09-18, and running
into problems mounting W2K shares. I was last able to mount these
shares a month ago. Since then, the only change I'm aware of was the
world update (to catch security patches) and accompanying mergemaster.
Here's
On (2003/10/30 11:37), Sheldon Hearn wrote:
I'm using SMBFS on FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE from 2003-09-18, and running
into problems mounting W2K shares. I was last able to mount these
shares a month ago. Since then, the only change I'm aware of was the
world update (to catch security patches)
On (2003/10/30 18:16), Sheldon Hearn wrote:
I'm using SMBFS on FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE from 2003-09-18, and running
into problems mounting W2K shares. I was last able to mount these
shares a month ago. Since then, the only change I'm aware of was the
world update (to catch security
Hi all
Since rebuilding a FreeBSD system recently because of the OpenSSH and Sendmail
issues, I've landed in a world of pain with mount_smbfs. The system is now
running 4.9-PRERELEASE, and mount_smbfs will mount shares from Windows machines
on the network without a problem, but it will no longer
I was mount smb file system with mount_smbfs -c l, but file and
folder names are don't convert to lowercase, whats wrong?
I was build kernel with options:
options NETSMB
options NETSMBCRYPTO
options LIBMCHAIN
options LIBICONV
options SMBFS
And I was install pakage libiconv-1.8_2
I was mount
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:47:02PM +0700, anton wrote:
I was mount smb file system with mount_smbfs -c l, but file and
folder names are don't convert to lowercase, whats wrong?
One thing that's wrong here is that you're asking the same question
over and over again every few hours. Don't do
Hi,
I have:
//pref/pref /pref smbfs rw,noauto 0 0
in my /etc/fstab and it works, but I have to press
the return key to submit the empty password when I
mount /pref and thus I have to use the noauto option.
I there a way to put the mount_smbfs option -N and
also -E koi8-r:cp866 into the /etc
Alexander Farber said:
Hi,
I have:
//pref/pref /pref smbfs rw,noauto 0 0
in my /etc/fstab and it works, but I have to press
the return key to submit the empty password when I
mount /pref and thus I have to use the noauto option.
I there a way to put the mount_smbfs option -N
Hi All,
After spending 1-2 fruitless hours trying to track down why I couldn't
automate my script to log into the local W2K server, I found that the
mount_smbfs man file is incorrect. At least with FreeBSD 4.7 anyway. Maybe
it just needs updating.
The default global location for the nsmb.conf
Hello-
i log into samba share alot in bsd so i put some entries in my fstab to automate
the process a little.
is there a password file i can store my smb share password in so fstab can find
and and not prompt me for it each time?
thanks,
b
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:49:16AM -0600, Brian Henning wrote:
From: Brian Henning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mount_smbfs password file
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:49:16 -0600
Hello-
i log into samba share alot in bsd so i put some entries in my fstab to automate
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:49:16AM -0600, Brian Henning wrote:
is there a password file i can store my smb share password in so fstab can find
and and not prompt me for it each time?
man mount_smbfs and note the Files section. It points you to an example.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
I have 2 machines running freebsd-4.7, one of which is a samba server. I
am trying to mount a directory on the other machine (my desktop) from the
samba server using mount_smbfs, but that doesn't work. I looked at the
log files and it seemed that the parameters were being sent incorrectly:
[2003
hello,
i am using samba 2.2.4 on freebsd 4.6.2 release. is it possible to mount smb
shares using mount_smbfs with a non-root account? or do i have to use sudo?
when i try to mount an smb share off my windows xp box onto my freebsd box,
i get the following:
~$ mount_smbfs //neelix/mike /mnt/mike
Hello,
I'm trying to use mount_smbfs -N to get it to read the password from
/root/.nsmbrc:
# A simple configuration example:
# First, define a workgroup.
[default]
workgroup=datasvr
# The 'FSERVER' is an NT server.
[datasvr]
addr=IP
[datasvr:mailbackup:mail_backup]
# use persistent password
with smbutil crypt. Upon invocation of
GA #mount_smbfs -N -I IP //mailbackup@datasvr/mail_backup /mnt
GA I end up with
GA mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error
Try to register your users in the /etc/samba/smbpasswd
You can add them using /usr/local/samba/bin
works on another Windows workstation on the same LAN.
MK Any ideas on what this might be?
In order to use mount_smbfs you should include the following
options in your kernel config file:
options SMBFS
options LIBMCHAIN
options LIBICONV
options NETSMB
options NETSMBCRYPTO
So try to recompile your
/root# mount_smbfs //photocd@pdx-james/pub mnt
Password:
/root# ls mnt
and sure enough, /root/mnt has the share mounted. Clearly I know
and can accurately type the password for login photocd.
But as an ordinary user (actually, a wheel user, and I [think I] have
sudo set up to allow wheel users to do
/usr/home/joeblow sudo mount_smbfs //photocd@pdx-james/pub mnt
Password:
Password:
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error
Here is the meat of my sudoers file:
# User privilege specification
rootALL=(ALL) ALL
# Uncomment to allow people in group
87 matches
Mail list logo
