/64259: expat-1.95.7 compile fails with non-obvious syntax error
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2004-March/027615.html) and has
been assigned a severity - low, rightly so
--
Joe S.
praxis makes perfect.
- anon
pointing to the
directory opera was looking in in the file /usr/local/bin/opera. There
wasn''t much interest on the opera list to this problem.
-
Joe Sotham
-
If the only prayer you
54:33:05 to
cddata329.bin...
Track 1...
Thanks,
-
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
this down so that ALL the ports show that they are closed???
Thanks,
Joe
00100 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
00400 0 0 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/24 to any in recv dc0
00500 0 0
for the recording in from the line-in of the
sound card using audacity?
When I use the default /dev/dsp nothing is captured.
--
-
Joe Sotham
-
If the only prayer you say
cdrecord and xcdroast:
sox infile.wav -c 2 outfile.wav split
Can someone explain the problem behind thise solution as I'd much rather
fix this in writing the file from audacity.
Thanks,
-
Joe Sotham
To Unsubscribe: send mail
processing function of
each of the tools and I am not sure what is most appropriate or if they
should be used in sequence or what is most appropriate for cleaning up
speech (given the limited dynamic range)
-
Joe Sotham
? Second, if so how
did you resolve it or did you?
Oh and someone once mentioned using echo Control-O and that
did not work. Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Joe
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http
would I talk to about changes in the
rc.diskless2 script to allow a few more options.
Thanks,
Joe
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
% Interleaved
Any ideas on why this is?
I'm using Freebsd 4.7
Thanks,
Joe
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
Hello,
My name is Joe and I am totally new to FREEBSD.
I have spent over 2 days trying to install this software but no matter
what I do the desktop size always ends up being too big.
If I click on alt + ctrl + - or + nothing happens. Tryed altering the
xf86config file it won't let me.
Why
Please don't feed the troll.
-Joe
On September 29, 2002 03:21 pm, SweeTLeaF wrote:
Hello ,
What is the issue with Freebsd currently? I am trying to move from
Open to Free and i have to say the experience to date is
undesirable.to say the least. I have tried several different
in the
ports collection. (For SCSI drives I prefer tosha.)
Regards
Oliver
Whereas my experience has been that cdparanoia is vastly superior to any
of the other tools! I should have checked before migrating from
Mandrake to freeBSD. Oh well!
Joe
Any other ideas?
I assume you did this as root/sudo? Strange that it's setuid . . . .
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-trouble.html
Is the immutable flag set
as root, try
chflags noschg
then delete
--
Joe
included from scan_devices.c:20:
utils.h:1: endian.h: No such file or directory
SoI obviously don't have the header files... Do I need to install the
entire linux src? I am stuck at this point. Is there a port which
provides this source?
--
Joe
developer's handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html)
does not offer an opinion
Is there some alternative thinking?
---
Joe Sotham
:}
been there, done that.
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping them both and keeping them furious.
- G.K. Chesterton
CD-ROM
0,1,0 1) 'SONY' 'CD-ROM CDU611-F ' '2.1a' Removable CD-ROM
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping them both and keeping them
).
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping them both and keeping them furious.
- G.K. Chesterton
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On October 31, 2002 10:12 pm, Jacob Rhoden wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:58, joe wrote:
There is a significant delay before ssh connects and returns a
prompt. I am on a private network, attempting a 192.168.0.XXX
192.168.0.YYY connection. There is a distinct 1:15 min delay
before
[snip]
I sometimes wear my daemon T-shirt at my church.
No problem.
jerry
My church drew the line at the linuxisforbitches logo :)
http://www.linuxisforbitches.com
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
can do to recover /etc/passwd
I just double checked and still seem to have access using other accounts
and I've made a copy of master.passwd in case I commit the changes
from passwd.
Joe Sotham
list -- TMDA Users
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping them both and keeping them furious.
- G.K
/group/worst_of_qmail/
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping them both and keeping them furious.
- G.K. Chesterton
.
Joe Sotham
Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites
by keeping them both and keeping them furious.
- G.K. Chesterton
To Unsubscribe: send mail
in several directories. I copy getopt.h from
/usr/include, then I get a message about bconfig.h missing from
the contrib source code as well.
Is there something else I need to get for 5.3 source that is
not needed in 5.2? Or is this a bug that should be / has been
filed?
Thanks in advance,
Joe
step I missed?
I've never had to do use the line
src-all tag=RELENG_2_2_5_RELEASE list=cvs:RELENG_2_2
before, do I need to do this now?
Why or how, if I completely deleted the contrib directory
would old files get there?
Joe
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun
Thanks,
It was an example from the cvsup faq.
I know I don't want 2.x. I figured I'd replace 5_2 and 5_3
in that line.
J
--- Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Joe wrote:
I've never had to do use the line
src-all tag=RELENG_2_2_5_RELEASE list
Hmm, at this point in time I am rebuilding 5.2.1 RELENG, which
is going to take a while on the old machine I am using.
I'll try this again later and reproduce it.
Joe
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Joe wrote:
Then my drive
In FreeBSD 4.x I used parts of that to create a cdrom.
In 5.x I now use parts of the freesbie port to create bootable
cdroms. It uses cdboot.
Joe
--- Greiman, John K (Mission Systems) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Using cdroot-1.2.5, I have successfuly created a bootable CD-R
which contains
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
any ideas?
Joe
Thanks, That seems to have worked.
Joe
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 06:23:10PM -0800, Joe wrote:
Hmm, now 5.2.1 is having problems with config.h missing.
cd /usr/src
rm -rf contrib gnu
cat supfile
*default host=cvsup6.freebsd.org
hi,
try
$ su
# kldload snd_driver
and you could see /dev/dsp.
--
joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, when I can get 4.10 working.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Joe
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
and /dev/mem are missing so netstat -ar does
not work either.
Where do I start to find a solution to this?
Thanks, Joe
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com
I haven't tried 5.4 yet. To build a 5.4 could take a couple of
days on these old machines.
Joe
--- Dmitry Mityugov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/05, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if this is the place to ask this. But this is
a
freebsd question.
I've
this machine up.
Joe
--- Dmitry Mityugov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/05, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if this is the place to ask this. But this is
a
freebsd question.
I've been running FreeBSD since about 4.6. I have 2
machines running FreeBSD. One
wondering if this is failing and causing the message above.
Is there a 'recommended' way to create a rule for ipfw on a
dhcp interface using its IP address?
Joe
--- Jarrod Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe wrote:
Okay, I've figure it out.
natd is not starting via rc.conf
setup
keep-state
I use ifconfig stuff to get EXT_IPADDR for the above rule. I
suppose I could use 'me' as I usually am referring to both
interfaces. I'll probably change to use me and see how that
goes.
I'm not sure why I get the hostname ``or'' unknown message
though.
Joe
--- Alex Zbyslaw
to switch to using 'me' instead.
Is it better to use 'me' or an ip address?
Joe
#! /bin/sh
# ipfw rules
#
##
# set up the ipf command
ipfw_cmd=/sbin/ipfw -q
IP - nat(dsl
modem) - nat(lan). I have no idea what my real ip address is
on the internet.
In any case, thanks for the advice. I've been thinking of
redoing these rules for 2 years now.
So how would your rules look if nat were in the picture?
Thanks,
Joe
--- Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL
-log_ipfw_denied -log_denied
Rules get set, natd does not start.
Interesting thing is that if I restart ipfw at the end of
/etc/rc ( /etc/rc.d/ipfw start ) natd starts.
Hmm, I'm confused on this one.
Joe
--- Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe wrote:
Thanks Alex,
Below are my rules. I
rules.
I still don't know why natd refuses to start the first time when
called from ipfw.
I have no rc.conf.local
Joe
--- Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe wrote:
Okay, back on topic.
I've changed my rules in ipfw, and no longer get the hostname
..
messages.
Now natd
somewhere that
5.2.1 wasn't production and that 5.3 was supposed to be
production.
I'll look into upgrading to 5.4, it will take a bit of time to
do that though.
Joe
--- Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe wrote:
Okay, I've been looking and looking for duplicate natd's.
I have the /etc
, and have not seen anything in the
man pages or elsewhere that would indicate why bind would need
ports, 53, 953, and then this high port.
Is this normal?
Thanks,
Joe
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
and have a great day :)
Thanks,
Joe
Note:
If you do not respond to this email you will not receive any additional
emails from us.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Niek Dekker wrote:
Dear list,
I would like to configure a monthly report of the incoming and
outgoing amount of traffic on the network interface of my server, for
instance in the monthly run output.
Try argus.
http://qosient.com/argus/
___
me a short
Description and Title of your site and link page URL with includes our site.
I would be happy to link exchange with you. My site description is given
below.
Thanks,
Joe
Title: webmasterswatch.com
URL: http://www.webmasterswatch.com/
Description:
Webmasters source
), and installing the
security/openssl port. At that point, the FreeRADIUS package built
perfectly fine.
Notes:
If anyone finds that the rlm_eap_?tls or rlm_eap_peap modules are not
building, make sure your OpenSSL port is up-to-date!
Joe
___
freebsd
How can I troubleshoot these errors below?
* The tool does report anything useful other than failed.
* There does not appear to be a logfile for failures.
* There does not appear to be any debug options.
Also, /var/db/freebsd-update
# freebsd-update fetch
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org
change that made it in? This seems to be a windows
issue, in particular windows 2k, but only with this one binary.
Thanks,
Joe
-
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV
to actually put out debugging info to the syslogs or on the
command line? I've tried the -d and got nothing.
any help is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Joe
-
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories
in a jail.
The weird thing is that if I set IPAutoConfiguration in the win2k registry to 0
( turning it off ), win2k get the gateway and dhcp server configured, but not
it's IP address.
Joe
Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
I have a backup of the old system and am using
I've got this message when I use cd-rw's in my cdrom drive, or when I use
certain cdroms.
It seems like the OS tries to read the cdrom and fails. It could be a bad
sector on the cdrom, dust or something else.
Joe
Aug 29 17:42:10 desktop kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG timed out
Aug 29 17
know how to force dhcpd to send its broadcast replies to the 'correct'
broadcast address?
Thanks,
Joe
-
Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car
Finder tool.
___
freebsd-questions
up (see isc-dhcp3 web site docs).
Joe
Peter Boosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe wrote:
Hello, after running tcpdump for a while I discoverd what is going on with my
dhcpd server and why some clients are not able to get an IP address from it,
in particular windows clients. It turns out
this and clients do not get their ip address. I read
somewhere that linux had a problem doing this in 2.2 kernels and it has
something to do with the routing table in linux. Not sure what is going on
here, but the routing table looks fine.
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems
tcpdump to output the offer. Using
tcpdump -netvvvi xl0 -t udp port 67 or udp port 68
Not sure what is going on now.
Joe
Ok, no so true. I am watching tcpdump output from the two binaries. The
old binary sends its reply to 255.255.255.255, while the new one sends its
reply
,
Joe
Ok, no so true. I am watching tcpdump output from the two binaries. The
old binary sends its reply to 255.255.255.255, while the new one sends its
reply to 192.168.0.15. Same config file and I tried the always-broadcast
flag, and it only sets the bit for the client
?
Joe
-
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
I figured out what the problem was. I had compiled my dhcp server with
USE_SOCKETS and am NOT running in a jail.
After a lot of searching the bug reports I came across an old bug that said
that USE_SOCKETS was added for jailed dhcp servers, because they do not have
access to bpf. It also
Joe wrote:
I have a question about natd/ and ipfw. I am running natd on my external
interface and I have some services on my internal interface.
The services seem to be getting their ip addresses nat'd and some of them
work and some of them dont.
Any idea how to prevent things
, but not sure what rule is denying
these messages.
Thanks,
Joe
Apr 29 21:35:24 router natd[545]: denied [TCP] 66.35.250.204:443 -
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:14519
Apr 29 21:35:24 router natd[545]: denied [TCP] 66.35.250.204:443 -
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:14520
Apr 29 21:35:24 router natd[545]: denied [TCP] 66.35.250.204
first to determine how easy it would be for someone
without much technical abilities to install FreeBSD and some user
packages and maintain it without getting involved in recompiling sources.
Thanks for your assistance.
Joe
___
freebsd-questions
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:42:43PM -0400, Joe wrote:
Hi,
I've read the documentation and it seems there's no pkg_upgrade or
pkg_update, or a way to install an updated/upgraded package. I'd like
to determine if that is indeed the case.
portupgrade -P or -PP
OK, since
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:51:51PM -0400, Joe wrote:
[...]
It failed to update expat however, because it kept looking in the
6.0-RELEASE paths. I presume this is because even though the binary
upgrade of the base to 6.1 went well, uname, etc., think I still have a
6.0
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:14:32PM -0400, Joe wrote:
I don't have access to the system right now, but after the sysinstall I
looked at some of the files in /bin and saw that most had a date of May
6, 2006 (or thereabouts) so I assumed that meant the binary upgrade had
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:12:25PM -0400, Joe wrote:
The .ko files have a Nov 3 2005 date, whereas the files in /boot
including the kernel directory have a May 6 2006 date. I take it that
Nov 3 means 6.0-RELEASE since the announcement was done on Nov 4. So, I
guess I'm
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:12:25PM -0400, Joe wrote:
The .ko files have a Nov 3 2005 date, whereas the files in /boot
including the kernel directory have a May 6 2006 date. I take it that
Nov 3 means 6.0-RELEASE since the announcement was done on Nov 4. So, I
guess I'm
the .ko's from 6.1 even though it got
everything else from 6.1.
Thanks for your help.
Joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:05:28PM -0400, Joe wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Anyway, retry the binary upgrade as you say.
The binary upgrade started from the 6.0-RELEASE CD-ROM didn't work
Wait, you were trying to update to 6.1-RELEASE using the 6.0-RELEASE
CD-ROM
How can I mount a filesystem that was originally formated in OpenBSD 3.9?
I am running FreeBSD 6.1-Release.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
haven't really used X
before, I don't know if this is normal or not.
Joe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why do the man pages read FreeBSD 6.2 on my 6.3 RELEASE system?
Is that intentional?
I did a clean install.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I'm currently running Solaris 10 Update 4 on x86 hardware at home.
I'm excited that ZFS is coming in FreeBSD 7.0.
I've found that I don't really like Solaris that much (no ports!). I
find it so different from other OS's and I don't want to learn another
OS just to have a decent fileserver.
This is interesting, especially because I was going to build a 64 bit
system for my next storage server.
Search through zfs-discuss on opensolaris.org.
If you don't find anything, post a message. Sun engineers frequent
that list.
Be sure to make it clear that you are using FreeBSD 7.0
John Levine wrote:
I'm putting together a freebsd router to sit between my LAN and a T1.
The current router (still running BSD/OS) uses BSDI's ipfw, but that
died when BSDI did. It's about as simple a routing job as one could
ask, a T1 with a static address to a LAN with a static /24.
I have a
Erik Norgaard wrote:
There is some trick to handle that, IIRC something like this would do:
ext_if=fxp0 # external interface
nat on $ext_if from lan to !lan - ($ext_if)
The () means that pf will lookup the ip on that interface, and update
dynamically when the ip changes.
That is correct.
I'm having a problem with a freebsd box that appears to be dropping
packets...according to bpfstat. I've included the necessary output.
bge1 is an interface that is connected to a Netoptics Aggregator tap.
-
$ systat -ifstat
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8
A while back, I read that 6.2 was going to be released today. Now I see
that 6.2 won't be released until Mid December.
Are FreeBSD releases put out whenever they're ready or is there a set
schedule that is adhered to?
I only ask because I am trying to schedule some server upgrades and I
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:24:47AM -0800, Joe wrote:
A while back, I read that 6.2 was going to be released today. Now I see
that 6.2 won't be released until Mid December.
Are FreeBSD releases put out whenever they're ready or is there a set
schedule that is adhered
Peo Nilsson wrote:
A while back, I read that 6.2 was going to be released today. Now I see
that 6.2 won't be released until Mid December.
Where did you get the information that it shouldn't be out before
mid december?
This page says Mid-December 2006. It also says Release dates are
Chris wrote:
Joe wrote:
Peo Nilsson wrote:
A while back, I read that 6.2 was going to be released today. Now I
see that 6.2 won't be released until Mid December.
Where did you get the information that it shouldn't be out before
mid december?
This page says Mid-December 2006. It also says
Fire the noob you have working for you and hire someone with a clue.
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
From my information security manager:
FreeBSD isn't much used within the University (I understand) and has a
(comparatively) poor security record. Most recently, for example:
I am thinking about running zfs on the host for everything except
booting the system. I plan to create a 1gb zfs area which I want to use
for a jail directory tree.
Is this possible?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I have been moving this file forward since about release 5.0.
Today is tried the do a man sudoers and got no page found.
The su man page does not reference it.
Has the file been removed?
Does it maybe belong to some port?
Any ideas?
Thanks
___
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?
For example: I would like to
snip
How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own
copyright. They all provide the same concept, use the same names for
their commands, use the same programming language, have a filesystem as
their base. Just where is the line drawn between a fork and a rewrite?
I archive using the pax command like this
pax -wzXt -x cpio -f ${archive_path_file} ${ip_path_file} ${ip_path_dir}
and restore
pax -rz -pe -f ${archive_path_file}
and it restores the contents back to the same location it came from
which is what I want.
Now I would like to restore that
I have special purpose situation where I need to wait until the boot
process has completed the starting of the system and then start the
firewall (ipfw or pf). Commenting out the firewall statements from the
hosts /etc/rc.conf does stop the firewall from starting at boot time.
Is there some
Hello questions list
I am using jail(8) trying to get a functional vimage environment on my
9.1-RELEASE system. My PC only has a single real NIC facing the public
internet. My goal is to be able to have multiple vimage jails, each with
their own epairXa epairXb and bridgeX where the X is the
When I do a ifconfig bridge create or ifconfig epair create commands I
get some high intensity messages on the hosts F1 session master console.
I would like to suppress these messages.
Is there any way to do that?
Thanks
___
I know ipfw can be loaded at boot time by adding statements to
/boot/loader.conf.
Problem is I dont know what the ipfw module names are.
How do I find the ipfw names to use?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Andreas Mueller wrote:
Hello there.
I know ipfw can be loaded at boot time by adding statements to
/boot/loader.conf.
Problem is I dont know what the ipfw module names are.
How do I find the ipfw names to use?
Not using ipfw by myself, but according to the handbook, the modules are
loaded
Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:23:58 -0400, Joe wrote:
I know ipfw can be loaded at boot time by adding statements to
/boot/loader.conf.
Problem is I dont know what the ipfw module names are.
How do I find the ipfw names to use?
There are two ways. The first is to do a ls command
running 9.1 and can not figure how to get into single user mode or safe
mode from the BOOT menu.
After hitting the 5 or 6 keys to select those options, what do you do
next to continue?
Hitting enter key just boots the system without regard to options selected.
Can not find usage of boot
Teske, Devin wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Joe wrote:
running 9.1 and can not figure how to get into single user mode or safe mode from the
BOOT menu.
After hitting the 5 or 6 keys to select those options, what do you do next to
continue?
Based on your description it sounds like you
David Demelier wrote:
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
path=/jails/foo;
allow.sysvipc=1;
}
And in /etc/rc.conf only foo in the jail_list parameter, but when I try to
start the jail it
David Demelier wrote:
Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
David Demelier wrote:
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
path=/jails/foo;
allow.sysvipc=1;
}
And in /etc/rc.conf only
David Demelier wrote:
2013/5/14 Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com:
David Demelier wrote:
Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
David Demelier wrote:
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
path
1 - 100 of 1241 matches
Mail list logo
