Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

2009-05-30 Thread Mel Flynn
On Saturday 30 May 2009 17:01:17 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote: > > The named running chrooted has no clue about /var/named. You can either > > use ducttape: > > cd /var/named/var && sudo ln -s .. named > > > > or just strip /var/named from your config file, hence use > > /var/log/xfer.log. > > > > --

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

2009-05-30 Thread Prokofyev Vladislav
> > named_enable="YES" > named_program="/usr/sbin/named" > named_chrootdir="/var/named" > > -Mike > > After adding these options on my system, named didn't start at boot. Manully attempt to start it via '/etc/rc.d/named start' brought to the following error: /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: run_rc_comma

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

2009-05-30 Thread Michael Powell
Prokofyev Vladislav wrote: > Hello, > > I have setup FreeBSD recently, can somebody help me with one interesting > thing - Bind9 slave DNS server, everything is works great, but I got a > problem with extended logging of xfer, etc. > Bind9 started in chroot: > > root 7880.0 0.1 3156

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p12 bind9 log files not found

2009-05-30 Thread Mel Flynn
On Saturday 30 May 2009 14:50:31 Prokofyev Vladislav wrote: > Bind9 started in chroot: > > root 7880.0 0.1 3156 1004 ?? Ss Fri01AM 0:02.10 > /usr/sbin/syslogd -l /var/run/log -l /var/named/var/run/log -s > bind30792 0.0 1.2 16212 12864 ?? Is4:10PM 0:00.23 > /usr/sbi

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-28 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 13:24:59 Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Mel wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote: > >> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote: > >>> Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of > >>> do

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-28 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Mel wrote: On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote: Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any better. If by

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-28 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:50 Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote: > > Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of > > downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any better. > > If by "lots" you mean "2 minutes for a r

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-28 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 10:32:57 Mel wrote: > Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of > downtime for OP without any certainty that things will be any better. If by "lots" you mean "2 minutes for a reboot", I'd be inclined to agree. -- Kirk Strauser ___

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-28 Thread Peter
>> > Well it is possible - but what information it can give me? > Could you explain - just to know if this 2 hours is acceptable for this. > Check DELL website for more info - but generally tests the harwrare componnents.. Peter ___ freebsd-questions@

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
> mail# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/megarc > mail# make install clean > ===> megarc-1.51 is marked as broken: Running megarc seems to cause > memory corruption. We have a PR open on that - ports/130326: http://groups.google.com/group/lucky.freebsd.ports.bugs/browse_thread/thread/14c7c3b8261e8be7

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Michael toth
Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Michael Toth wrote: >> >> Proskurin Kirill wrote: >>> Michael Toth wrote: Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Hello all. > > What we have: > Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. > It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). > All latest version fro

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Peter пишет: Proskurin Kirill wrote: Peter wrote: Hi, Try updating to lastest version: BIOS RAID Controller BIOS RAID Controller Firmware Do you think it can be a problem? It is possible to test it some how? This host is really far away from me. Last 3 months I had is

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Peter
Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Peter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Try updating to lastest version: >> >> BIOS >> RAID Controller BIOS >> RAID Controller Firmware > > Do you think it can be a problem? > It is possible to test it some how? > > This host is really far away from me. > Last 3 months I had issues wil

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 01:02:00 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Because there are many bugs were in 7.0 and got fixed in 7.1, and maybe you > are affected by one of them. Even though 7.1 has bugfixes, this kind of guesswork causes a lot of downtime for OP without any certainty that thin

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Michael Toth wrote: Proskurin Kirill wrote: Michael Toth wrote: Proskurin Kirill wrote: Hello all. What we have: Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). All latest version from ports. After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 time

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Michael Toth
Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Michael Toth wrote: >> Proskurin Kirill wrote: >>> Hello all. >>> >>> What we have: >>> Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. >>> It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). >>> All latest version from ports. >>> >>> >>> After start a production use - it is start to r

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Michael Toth wrote: Proskurin Kirill wrote: Hello all. What we have: Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). All latest version from ports. After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 times a day with no reason. We think what it is a h

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Peter wrote: Hi, Try updating to lastest version: BIOS RAID Controller BIOS RAID Controller Firmware Do you think it can be a problem? It is possible to test it some how? This host is really far away from me. -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill ___

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Peter
Hi, Try updating to lastest version: BIOS RAID Controller BIOS RAID Controller Firmware Peter Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Hello all. > > What we have: > Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. > It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). > All latest version from ports. > > > After start a p

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Mikhail Goriachev wrote: Proskurin Kirill wrote: Hello all. What we have: Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). All latest version from ports. After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 times a day with no reason. We think what it

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
- Original Message > From: Proskurin Kirill > To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri ; FreeBSD Questions > Mailing List > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:45:46 PM > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950 > > Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: >

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Mikhail Goriachev
Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Hello all. > > What we have: > Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. > It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). > All latest version from ports. > > > After start a production use - it is start to reboot 3-4 times a day > with no reason. We think what it is a har

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: - Original Message From: Proskurin Kirill To: freebsd-questions Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:07:25 PM Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950 Hello all. What we have: Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950

2009-01-27 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
- Original Message > From: Proskurin Kirill > To: freebsd-questions > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:07:25 PM > Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 reboots on Dell 2950 > > Hello all. > > What we have: > Dell 2950 with FreeBSD-7.0-p9 on it. > It work as mail server(Exim+Dovecot and so on). > All

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error

2009-01-13 Thread T D
Hopefully I am posting to the correct list...Or should I be posting to freebsd-stable? --- On Wed, 14/1/09, T D wrote: From: T D Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009, 6:58 AM This is a listing of my hardware, I

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Installation error

2009-01-13 Thread T D
This is a listing of my hardware, I probably should have listed it in my earlier post. Hardware: Motherboard: A7N8X-E Deluxe socket A (462) Chipset: Northbridge: NVIDIA nforce2 spp ultra400 Southbrdige nvidia nforce2 MCP-T memory ddr 184pin (maximum of 3x184) I have kingston kvr400x64c3ak 512mb

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

2009-01-10 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"David Christensen" writes: > freebsd-questions: > > I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386: > > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=amand > a-server > > > Most of my software background is GNU/Linux. I would prefer using the > Bash s

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

2009-01-10 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:46:54PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 2:09 PM -0800 1/4/09, David Christensen wrote: > > > >I have changed the root shell to Bash on another machine I use as a CVS > >server and haven't noticed any issues yet, but I've been wondering if > >I'm setting myself up fo

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

2009-01-09 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:09 PM -0800 1/4/09, David Christensen wrote: I have changed the root shell to Bash on another machine I use as a CVS server and haven't noticed any issues yet, but I've been wondering if I'm setting myself up for problems by doing so. Does anybody know if it's okay to change the root shel

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

2009-01-06 Thread Frank Shute
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:09:03PM -0800, David Christensen wrote: > > freebsd-questions: > > I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386: > > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=amand > a-server > > > Most of my software background is GN

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Stable Crashed with Cacti

2009-01-06 Thread kalpin
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Kalpin Erlangga Silaen > wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> we face problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top >> command output: >> > > - > snip > - > >> We realized that all cacti process just eat my cpu and memory (STATE: >> pfault) and my server

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-Stable Crashed with Cacti

2009-01-06 Thread APseudoUtopia
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Kalpin Erlangga Silaen wrote: > Dear All, > > we face problem with running cacti on FreeBSD 7.0-Stable. From top command > output: > - snip - > We realized that all cacti process just eat my cpu and memory (STATE: pfault) > and my server should be reboot

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

2009-01-04 Thread matt donovan
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:09 PM, David Christensen wrote: > freebsd-questions: > > I'm building a fresh Amanda server using FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386: > > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=misc&portname=amand > a-server

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-i386 will changing root shell break anything?

2009-01-04 Thread Modulok
> Does anybody know if it's okay to change the root shell? A topic of debate, but yes it is okay to change the root shell, but there are some things to know... Some people fret about the idea that shells like bash are not on the root partition and are usually dynamically linked to libraries which

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 problems

2008-12-04 Thread Mel
On Thursday 04 December 2008 19:51:59 Da Rock wrote: > Why would I install a beta when I'm mainly interested in stable > releases? That's why I asked. You're not in a position to troubleshoot this problem, since the usual suspects (wrong driver, signs of significant acpi problems) don't apply

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 problems

2008-12-04 Thread Mel
On Thursday 04 December 2008 03:06:34 Da Rock wrote: > I have just installed FreeBSD 7.0 on a laptop I just cleaned up. It used > to run Fedora linux (I have a tv card which used to work on it, but now > I can't get the drivers to work again), and it got very cluttered and > started getting issues.

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
Pieter Donche wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: Hi, All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. So this would point to "ia64" distribution? But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itani

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
Pieter Donche wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: Hi, All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. So this would point to "ia64" distribution? But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itani

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
Pieter Donche wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: Hi, All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. So this would point to "ia64" distribution? But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itani

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
My box is a web/mail/vpn/router/samba (yes i know there shouldn't be that many services on the box, but tell my boss that) and all the apps are working like a charm. his money his problem. overspending on hardware it's quite common, instead of paying more employees with the same money. ___

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Valentin Bud
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Johan Hendriks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that >>> some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386. > >>what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ??? > > Nvidia

RE: Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Johan Hendriks
>> Nvidia drivers. >> >> Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit >> Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia? >> Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers? >because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them

Re: Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Nvidia drivers. Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia? Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers? because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)

Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Robert Huff
=?windows-1250?Q?Ott_K=F6stner?= writes: > I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD on my desktop, just > because of Nvidia drivers. > > Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to > expect 64 bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is > the problem with

Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Ott Köstner
Johan Hendriks wrote: the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386. what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ??? Nvidia!!! I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD

RE: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Johan Hendriks
>> the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that >> some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386. >what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ??? Nvidia!!! Regards, Johan Hendriks No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AV

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386. what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ??? ___ freebs

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
So use the amd64 ;) Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386? yes Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after initial install and way in the production usage ?? no. the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that some

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: 2008/12/2 Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: Hi, All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. I never googled it before, but 2 sec gave me http://www.freebsd.o

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ? Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386: disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb; ia

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Ebbe Hjorth
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > > Hi, >> All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. >> > So this would point to "ia64" distribution? > But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View > tells for ia64: Cur

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: Hi, All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. So this would point to "ia64" distribution? But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2 There

Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Ebbe Hjorth
Hi, All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version. 368 vs 372 is that the 64 bit is compiled for 64 bit, and uses a little more space. / Ebbe 2008/12/2 Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors > Intel Harpert

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 fdisk issue during installation

2008-11-22 Thread Jonatan Evald Buus
Thank you both for the very detailed description. It's nice to get my suspicion about boot sequencing confirmed :-) When I installed the system yesterday (I think I'll try a re-install today based on your input) I observed however that all the slices I made appeared to be bootable. As originally m

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 fdisk issue during installation

2008-11-21 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:41:07PM +0100, Jonatan Evald Buus wrote: > Hi Jerry, > Thank you for the swift and very thorough response. > > If I understand you correctly, then I should only create 1 slice of the > entire disk (seeing as FreeBSD will be the only OS) using fdisk and then > partition

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 fdisk issue during installation

2008-11-21 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:07 +0100, "Jonatan Evald Buus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I understand you correctly, then I should only create 1 slice of the > entire disk (seeing as FreeBSD will be the only OS) using fdisk and then > partition the slice using bsdlabels from sysinstall? Yes, that

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 fdisk issue during installation

2008-11-21 Thread Jonatan Evald Buus
Hi Jerry, Thank you for the swift and very thorough response. If I understand you correctly, then I should only create 1 slice of the entire disk (seeing as FreeBSD will be the only OS) using fdisk and then partition the slice using bsdlabels from sysinstall? Previously I was aiming for 5 slices,

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 fdisk issue during installation

2008-11-21 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:03:58PM +0100, Jonatan Evald Buus wrote: > Greetings, > I tried to install FreeBSD 7.0 on an old server earlier today and ran in to > a number of issues related to slicing and labeling the disk using fdisk. > The drive in the machine is a 40GB Seagate Barracude (ST34001A

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread Michael Powell
David Christensen wrote: [snip] > > > devel/glib20 and gio-fam-backend seemed to go okay. I think I got > further into firefox3, but it failed: checking for cairo >= 1.6.0 freetype2 fontconfig... Requested 'cairo >= 1.6.0' but version of cairo is 1.4.10 This is telling you the cairo you have

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread matt donovan
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:01 PM, David Christensen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sahil Tandon wrote: > > Do these ellipses include a 'make install'? Otherwise, that is likely > > your problem; devel/glib20 is not actually installed. > > Michael Powell wrote: > >> If you previously had glib20-2.1

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread David Christensen
Sahil Tandon wrote: > Do these ellipses include a 'make install'? Otherwise, that is likely > your problem; devel/glib20 is not actually installed. Michael Powell wrote: If you previously had glib20-2.14.6 installed, you will need to do a 'make deinstall' prior to 'make reinstall'. ... then

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread Michael Powell
David Christensen wrote: > mdh wrote: >> The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version, >> then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other >> software. > > Thank you for your response. :-) > > > Here's my attempt to carry out your suggestions: > > 2008

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread Sahil Tandon
David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mdh wrote: >> The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version, >> then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other software. >> > > Thank you for your response. :-) > > Here's my attempt to carry out your sug

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread David Christensen
mdh wrote: The answer is to upgrade your devel/glib20 port to the latest version, then try to install or upgrade libgiofam, then install the other software. Thank you for your response. :-) Here's my attempt to carry out your suggestions: 20081026-122203 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # portsnap fetc

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread mdh
--- On Sun, 10/26/08, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find > -lgio-2.0 > To: "Freebsd-Questions" > Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 2:10 PM > freebsd-questions: > > If

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (GENERIC) firefox3 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgio-2.0

2008-10-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:10:48AM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > freebsd-questions: Try freebsd-ports for this question, as your issue is with a port. :-) -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodiu

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 installation problems.Please help!

2008-09-26 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 01:58:41PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote: > > "Write failure on transfer! > > (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)" > > "Unable to transfer the GENERIC distribution from acd0" > > I'm a bit of a n00b too. There's a whole host of things that have > given me that issue - bad cd dr

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 installation problems.Please help!

2008-09-26 Thread Steve Franks
> "Write failure on transfer! > (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)" > "Unable to transfer the GENERIC distribution from acd0" I'm a bit of a n00b too. There's a whole host of things that have given me that issue - bad cd drive, scratched disk, etc. More importantly, I've seen sysinstall never act

Re: freeBSD 7.0 supports ACE Proactor?

2008-09-18 Thread Ivan Voras
Mungyung Ryu wrote: > Hi freeBSD users, > > I've developed couple of server applications on Windows platform with ACE > Proactor > and it worked quite well. But, because of the expensive Windows Server, > I wanna move to Linux or freeBSD. > > Recently, I'm considering to build a server applicati

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 install on Acer Aspire AM1640-U1401A

2008-09-14 Thread eculp
Quoting Christer Hermansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Joseph Olatt wrote: Hello, I have tried installing the following versions of FreeBSD: - 7.0 Release - 6.2 Release - 6.1 Release on an ACER Aspire AM1640-U1401A computer and the install program is not detecting the SATA hard drive. Doe

Re: freebsd 7.0 and jail

2008-09-10 Thread gahn
thanks for the advice. it worked out after i did "make world ..." first, then "make installworld ..". it doesn't work if one just do "make installworld ..." best --- On Wed, 9/10/08, Primeroz lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Primeroz list

Re: freebsd 7.0 and jail

2008-09-10 Thread Primeroz lists
Make sure your buildworld /usr/obj is updated. Good idea is to erase your /usr/obj and buildworld again before going on with the jails. fc On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:28 PM, gahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > > I am trying to build jails on 7.0 system and got errors: > > ///

Re: freebsd 7.0 and jail

2008-09-09 Thread Oliver Peter
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:28:09AM -0700, gahn wrote: > Hello: > > I am trying to build jails on 7.0 system and got errors: > > / > > >>> Installing everything > -- > cd /usr/src; make -f Make

RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

2008-08-31 Thread David Polak
> > Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have > > a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb > > sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is > > still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver > > should perform better. > > Alternati

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

2008-08-31 Thread perryh
> Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have > a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb > sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is > still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver > should perform better. Alternatively, to avoid

RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

2008-08-31 Thread Michael Powell
David Polak wrote: [snip] >> >> try setting up speed and duplex options manually > > I have set the duplex to full-duplex and it has increased the speed to > about 200kb/s on the same file. > > As far as phy support, I guess I really don't know, but the drivers for > the chipset have been aroun

RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

2008-08-31 Thread David Polak
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 11:21 AM > To: David Polak > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter

2008-08-31 Thread Wojciech Puchar
still seeing really slow download speeds. I then decided to see if something was wrong with the system by downloading the same image from the same source that I downloaded on linux in order to bootstrap freebsd and the speed difference was appaling. It had downloaded at 10.29 MB/s. Once freebsd wa

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 on Xen

2008-08-09 Thread Gueven Bay
2008/8/8 Elwell, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry about the premature sending. Here is the complete question: >> Greetings, >> I am attempting to follow the directions located at >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/virtualization-guest.html >> and load a FreeBSD Xen DomU instance.

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 on Xen

2008-08-08 Thread Elwell, Richard
CentOS 5.2 On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:04 PM, OutBackDingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > I have a working config for non-HVM systems, its stable enough to play with but > not for production, if you have however a HVM machine,

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 on Xen

2008-08-08 Thread Josh Carroll
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:04 PM, OutBackDingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a working config for non-HVM systems, its stable enough to play with > but > not for production, if you have however a HVM machine, FreeBSD runs great > under linux KVM What host OS are you using for dom0? I'm consi

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 on Xen

2008-08-08 Thread OutBackDingo
I have a working config for non-HVM systems, its stable enough to play with but not for production, if you have however a HVM machine, FreeBSD runs great under linux KVM On Friday 08 August 2008 22:46:11 Elwell, Richard wrote: > Sorry about the premature sending. Here is the complete question:

RE: FreeBSD 7.0 on Xen

2008-08-08 Thread Elwell, Richard
Sorry about the premature sending. Here is the complete question: > Greetings, > > I am attempting to follow the directions located at > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/virtualization-guest.html > and load a FreeBSD Xen DomU instance. The document says: > Download the FreeBSD dom

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement.

2008-07-31 Thread Daniel de Oliveira
Im using 7.0 on my Dell Latitude C400 and works very fine (Pentium3 1.2, 256 ram). Sure, because I'm sometimes paranoic about performane even with slow machines, I'm using xfce. On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:43, ketan tada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I've tried to find hardware requirement

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement.

2008-07-31 Thread Manolis Kiagias
ketan tada wrote: Hello I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0 but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware requirement? I have laptop(celeron 1.4, 256 ram) so Can you suggest me which verson is suitable for my hardware. Thanks and Regards, Ketan. You ne

RE: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement.

2008-07-31 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:43:07 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org > CC: > Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 Hardware Requirement. > > Hello > > I've tried to find hardware requirement for FreeBSC 7.0 > but I couldn't found that. Can you please send me the hardware require

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 amd64 FAMP Server RAM problem

2008-07-24 Thread Jason W. Morgan
On 2008.07.24 17:49:56, Benjamin Adams wrote: > Hello everyone. I'm running a website (http://www.FreeBSD-World.com/) When > the RAM is used up and moves to inactive the pages stop loading 100%. > Pages will stop halfway and sometimes I will get a display of what is in the > httpd.access log. Ju

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 and RAM limit

2008-07-12 Thread Rodolfo Pellegrino
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Robert Heron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I use: > > FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM onboard. > BIOS version - 88 (the latest) > > Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024) > > And FreeBSD reports only: >

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 and RAM limit

2008-07-10 Thread Ivan Voras
Robert Heron wrote: Hi, I use: FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM onboard. BIOS version - 88 (the latest) Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024) You generally shouldn't touch MAXMEM as it's autotuned. And FreeBSD reports only: real memory =

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 and RAM limit

2008-07-09 Thread David Gurvich
Hello, You might try the 64bit FreeBSD, I think your system is 64bit capable. That has much higher limits on memory addressing and should get around the issue. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 and RAM limit

2008-07-09 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2008-07-05T13:04:19+02:00, Robert Heron wrote: > FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM > onboard. BIOS version - 88 (the latest) > > Kernel includes: options MAXMEM=(6*1024*1024) > > And FreeBSD reports only: > > real memory = 2680160256 (2556 MB) > av

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 and RAM limit

2008-07-05 Thread Wojciech Puchar
use amd64 On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, Robert Heron wrote: Hi, I use: FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM onboard. BIOS version - 88 (the latest) Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024) And FreeBSD reports only: real memory = 2680160256 (2556

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 and RAM limit

2008-07-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
Robert Heron wrote: Hi, I use: FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM onboard. BIOS version - 88 (the latest) Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024) > And FreeBSD reports only: real memory = 2680160256 (2556 MB) avail memory = 2617892864 (2496 MB

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

2008-06-27 Thread chip
Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround?

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

2008-06-27 Thread Ryan Coleman
chip wrote: Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote:

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

2008-06-27 Thread chip
Ryan Coleman wrote: chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote: A little mor

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

2008-06-27 Thread Ryan Coleman
chip wrote: Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote: A little more info - I now have g

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera? Almost got it figured out

2008-06-27 Thread chip
Heheh, got that working, had to add sudo to the beginning of the command. Now the problem has to do with permissions. The pics are downloaded with the owner being root, so I have to view the pics as root. Whats the workaround? Thanks. chip wrote: A little more info - I now have gphoto2 recogn

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera?

2008-06-27 Thread chip
A little more info - I now have gphoto2 recognizing and downloading my images, but only in a terminal window. I am using XFCE and want to create a shortcut on the toolbar or the desktop that will open a terminal window and run the command. I have a shortcut set up but it just opens a terminal w

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 Release and Camera?

2008-06-27 Thread Thomas
* chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-27 13:40:59+]: > Anyone know how to get FBSD 7-R to recognize my Canon S3 IS and > download pics from it? Nowadays mostly everyone gets a cheap (less than $10US) USB card reader and reads it that way. Thomas ___ f

  1   2   3   >