On 04/07/2012 05:52, dhaneshk k wrote:
> Please ignore my previous mail with the same subject line because there was
> a terrible formatting mistake.
> Please see the attached pdf which briefs the problem in assigning the IP
> address to the netbsd virtual machine.
> The Xen VM is running on D
a PDF.
Thanks
--
Subhro Sankha Kar
System Administrator
Working and Playing with FreeBSD since 2002
>
>
>> From: sub...@80386.org
>> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:06:56 +0530
>> To: dhanes...@hotmail.com
>> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: Networking IP
attached document for detailed description.
Any hints much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Dhanesh
> From: sub...@80386.org
> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:06:56 +0530
> To: dhanes...@hotmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Networking IP Address Issues
On 03-Jul-2012, at 12:34 PM, dhaneshk k wrote:
>
> The Same problems
> discussed here were faced.
>
> Any hints to solve these issues much appreciated.
No hints till you learn how to format your email properly, a basic requirement
when posting to a mailing list.
>
> Thank you
You are welco
>Sounds like you are narrowing down the culprit(s). Also note that it could
>possibly be a timing issue related to the order things start up. If
the NATD
>is attempting to start before the interface has come up it will die.
/etc/rc.d/natd has no REQUIRE section, so it is indeed possible for it
umage wrote:
[snip]
>> In my case the router does get the renewed ip, as I described earlier.
>> However, even after waiting 8+ hours, the system will not recover from
>> the outage properly (reason unknown). That's what this thread is all
>> about.
> When I started the system today, I found that
On 9. 11. 2009 1:27, umage wrote:
> When the connection goes down and comes back up it will take 5 minutes
> before my FreeBSD gateway box checks the lease and decides if a
renewal is
> in order. This is automatic. If I am sitting in front of my computer
and I
> want to speed this up I issue /e
> When the connection goes down and comes back up it will take 5 minutes
> before my FreeBSD gateway box checks the lease and decides if a
renewal is
> in order. This is automatic. If I am sitting in front of my computer
and I
> want to speed this up I issue /etc/rc.d/netif restart on the gatewa
umage wrote:
> On 7. 11. 2009 19:07, Jason wrote:
>> Have you tried restarting routing?
>>
>> /etc/rc.d/routing restart
>>
>> I have found the same symptoms with other outages and not performing the
>> above.
>>
>> I have done "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" and "/etc/rc.d/routing restart".
>>
[snip]
>>
On 7. 11. 2009 19:07, Jason wrote:
Have you tried restarting routing?
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
I have found the same symptoms with other outages and not performing the
above.
I have done "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" and "/etc/rc.d/routing restart".
Wtih using these commands, I have found this t
Have you tried restarting routing?
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
I have found the same symptoms with other outages and not performing the
above.
I have done "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" and "/etc/rc.d/routing restart".
Wtih using these commands, I have found this to be successful in restoring
network
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have, for some time, been able to ssh into my father's FreeBSD machine in
> the Road Runner network in Central New York. Last night, I tried so that I
> could fix a problem for him and ssh timed out.
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:19:04 -0600
Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have, for some time, been able to ssh into my father's FreeBSD
> machine in the Road Runner network in Central New York. Last night,
> I tried so that I could fix a problem for him and ssh timed out. No
>
Jefferson wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question and a problem, i installed freebsd v. 6.1 on my desktop
and my networking card doesn't work with freebsd... I have a Onboard Intel
Nineveh 82566DM (10/100/1000 Mbit).
Somebody please could help me, how can i install this network card and
make work well
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:53:13AM -0200, Jefferson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question and a problem, i installed freebsd v. 6.1 on my desktop
> and my networking card doesn't work with freebsd... I have a Onboard Intel
> Nineveh 82566DM (10/100/1000 Mbit).
>
> Somebody please could help me,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:53:13AM -0200, Jefferson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question and a problem, i installed freebsd v. 6.1 on my desktop
> and my networking card doesn't work with freebsd... I have a Onboard Intel
> Nineveh 82566DM (10/100/1000 Mbit).
>
> Somebody please could help me,
On 10/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 13:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Subject: Re: confirm 3454f2d8611cde291b81fa177d2434593f5e6d36
>
> What a great way of stating my "non-idiot" credentials :)
> ___
Nah..yo
Hiya,
On Thursday 04 October 2007 14:03:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a 5.3 installation which currently has about 5000 'ESTABLISHED' TCP
> connections. That figure quadruples in the evening.
>
> Are there any sysctls that I should be tweaking to handle lots of TCP
> connections?
2 thing
This is more a windows problem and specific more a WINS/NETBios/name
resolution problem.
Do you got a dns server? Some kind of domain?
What I understand from your story the following happens: Client queries on
netbios level; who is \\computername to the masterbrowser list, can't find
on local subn
On 8/3/05, Stephan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >From: Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >Internet
> >|
> >| |WANs 1-4, 192.168.2/24, 192.168.3/24, 192.168.4/24,
> >192.168.5/24
> >Firewall -- DMZ 192.168.1/24 - Pixel, httpd, samba
> >|
> >
From: Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:26:15 -0500
On 8/2/05, Step
You can use ipf or ipfw as firewall to create a set of rules, allowind and
denying access to different resources from/to different network. Also you
can use ipnat to make NAT translation if needed.
Personally I'd advice you to use ipf as packet filter, ipfw as traffic
shaper and ipnat for NAT.
On 8/2/05, Stephan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Stephan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
> >Date: Tue,
From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:26:07 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very Much for your quick response.
You'r
On 8/2/05, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephan Weaver wrote:
>
> > Hello Everyone.
> >
> > We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via
> > Fiber.
> > We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
> > So we have decided to separate them by net
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very Much for your quick response.
You're welcome.
I am familar with firewalling, but i never done something like this.
Mabee you can give me an actual Example from my reference.
Using my networks ect.
Sure, if I had lots of free time and nothing e
From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:38:27 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
But AFAIK, By Placing all these network cards in the Same Mach
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
But AFAIK, By Placing all these network cards in the Same Machine,
FreeBSD Will Bridge All Those Networks.
FreeBSD is well-behaved in terms of security. It will not act as a layer-2
bridge or as a layer-3 IP router/firewall, unless and until you tell it to do so.
From: Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be co
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip addressing] because of
security.
Head Offi
Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via
Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip addressing]
because of security.
Head Office
I have 3 Server
On 12/31/04 13:51:21, Skylar Thompson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:56:47AM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> I have used the 'smbclient' from Samba to access my WinXP computers
from
> my FreeBSD computer. I have also used 'sharity-light'.
>
> Does anyone know of any other full featured networking
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:56:47AM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> I have used the 'smbclient' from Samba to access my WinXP computers from
> my FreeBSD computer. I have also used 'sharity-light'.
>
> Does anyone know of any other full featured networking tool that I can
> use to access my WinXP bo
If you have more than one computer available, try linking up a switch to
your second Ethernet card and running a test between two machines that
should not touch the gateway. What's your internal LAN speed when the
gateway is not involved? That will tell you whether it's the gateway you
need to loo
http.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Networking w/ FreeBSD
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have two computers systems in my network. The first system is a headless
> FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. This system stores my mp3's, datafiles and runs mysql and
> apache. I recently, got rid of windows off my laptop and installed FreeBSD
> 5.2.1. When I had windows on the lap
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have two computers systems in my network. The first system is a headless
> FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. This system stores my mp3's, datafiles and runs mysql and
> apache. I recently, got rid of windows off my laptop and installed FreeBSD
> 5.2.1. When I ha
On Jun 1, 2004, at 2:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is this: How would I set something up to perform the same
functionality, as when I had windows? I'm just not sure what needs to
be
installed on either system? Any ideas or comments would be great!
FreeBSD supports mounting Samba/CIFS
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Henrik Zagerholm wrote:
Hi all!
Installing 5.2 on my new box with an integraded Intel PRO 1000 CT NIC.
System detects it as em0 but I cant get it to work. I'm trying dhcp
and I have added the line: ifconfig_em0="DHCP" in rc.conf but I still
get this problem.
Henrik Zagerholm wrote:
Hi all!
Installing 5.2 on my new box with an integraded Intel PRO 1000 CT NIC.
System detects it as em0 but I cant get it to work. I'm trying dhcp
and I have added the line: ifconfig_em0="DHCP" in rc.conf but I still
get this problem.
em0: Watchdog Timeout ---Resetting
I
Hi!
I do have the same problem with my Intel Gigabit onboard NIC. The system
detects it, but it doesn't work. Do you also get watchdog timeouts??
I traced it down to a PCI interrupt problem.
dmesg:
pcib2: could not get PCI interrupt routing table for \\_SB_.PCI0.CSAB -
AE_NOT_FOUND
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rob G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: Networking Questions
> On Saturday 10 April 2004 01:54 pm, Rob G <"Rob G"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I
On Saturday 10 April 2004 01:54 pm, Rob G <"Rob G"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am new to the list, but I have tried researching the archives and
> couldn't find exactly what I am looking for and would like your
> opinion on how to do this:
>
> I have a 4Meg DSL connection with Mult
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Steve Ireland wrote:
> The two interfaces are on different subnets: 192.168.0.0/24 and
> 192.168.10.0/24. You need to either add a static route between them
> or change their netmasks to at least a /21.
Huh? They _must_ be on different subnets. You can't route one subnet
acr
That should have been /20 not /21.
Sorry,
Steve
>- Original Message -
>From: "Kathy Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 19:46
>Subject: Networking problem UPDATED
>
>
> I have a friend who can not get his FreeBSD 5.2 server to act as a
>
- Original Message -
From: "Kathy Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 19:46
Subject: Networking problem UPDATED
> I have a friend who can not get his FreeBSD 5.2 server to act as a
> gateway, from the internal network we can ping the exte
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
> I have a friend who can not get his FreeBSD 5.2 server to act as a
> gateway, from the internal network we can ping the external network
> card, but no further. From the server we can ping the entire world.
>
> I had him bring it over and set up my serve
>
> I was wondering. What is an easy, and good programe to use. To network
> my FreeBSD and Win98box.
Depends on what you mean "to network". To just hook them together
you don't need anything on the FreeBSD side. If you want to be able
to "mount a network drive" on the win box, then run Samb
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Earl wrote:
> I was wondering. What is an easy, and good programe to use. To network
> my FreeBSD and Win98box.
how do you plan to connect these two boxes?
Are they both already on your LAN and each box
can ping the other?
What is your goal? Samba quickly comes to mind wh
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:57:09 +0100
Simon Barner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
> Hello Ivan,
>
> > As I'm about to create a kind of a WAN in my area, and I'm having a
> > specific problem, a friend adviced me to install FreeBsd. Problem is
> > that this WAN would be connected to the internet
Hello Ivan,
> As I'm about to create a kind of a WAN in my area, and I'm having a
> specific problem, a friend adviced me to install FreeBsd. Problem is
> that this WAN would be connected to the internet with 1Mbit/s
> connection, and what I want is that connection to the Internet is
> shared to o
Hello Bryan Cassidy,
You might save yourself some trouble by buying a very
cheap ready-to-go appliance router like the NR041 for
$32.99 from Buy.com:
http://www.buy.com/retail/product_jump.asp?sku=10329936&SearchEngine=ya&SearchTerm=10329936&Type=1103&Category=Comp&dcaid=17194
I carry one to cli
At 10:55 AM 10/24/2003, Sandbox Video Productions wrote:
I would like a tutorial on how to newtork freebsd to
windowsXP via linksys modem. i can ping the windowsXP
but i can't connect nor can i install mozilla. it
seems that it's not connecting to the internet. the
handbook gives good descriptions
Which machine, FreeBSD or XP, is connected to the Internet? If it is XP
select 'share internet connection' in the advance settings for the
network settings to make XP the gateway for the FreeBSD machine. Then in
/etc/rc.conf add (or modify)
defaultrouter="ip.to.xp.box"
and in /etc/resolv.conf mak
There's a dialup firewall howto here...
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/dialup-firewall/index.html
if you have cable or dsl, try reading these
http://www.defcon1.org/html/Networking_Articles/networking_articles.html
Lots of resources are out there. I use ipfilter and ipnat and
Try the FreeBSD Handbook at freebsd.org.
Adam
Axl Rose wrote:
trying to use fbsd as firewall and router to internet w/ win982nd behind
firewalll.
whats a good place for doc to do this or maybe examples???
_
Add photos to your e-ma
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Tkachenko, Artem N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted similar question some time ago but I guess I misstated the problem.
> I will be more careful this time. Here is my situation:
>
> Node A <-> LAN1 <-> Node B <-> LAN2 <-> Node C
Why can't you just set a static route
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:45:43AM -0700 I heard the voice of
> Bryan W. Maxwell, and lo! it spake thus:
>>
>> Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats
>> all good. But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the
>> otherside is connected to a micropic w
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 07:45:43AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Bryan W. Maxwell, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats all
> good. But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the otherside
> is connected to a micropic web serve
+-- Bryan W. Maxwell [18-06-03 07:45 -0700]:
| Thanks everyone! I fixed the local address with the eth0 now so thats all
| good.
eth0? AFAIK, eth0 is not used in FreeBSD. It is used in
Linux. Which OS are you using?
Regards,
Shantanu
--
Want to know how many wor
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
>> +-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
>> | On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
>> | > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the
>> local | > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
>> |
>> |This is by definition.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
> But my serial line only allows me to ping 192.168.2.2, the otherside
> is connected to a micropic web server and its address is 192.168.2.3. Thats
> when it returns, the ping: sendto: Network dropped connection on reset.
I believe that a reset
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
> +-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
> | On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
> | > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
> | > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
> |
> | This is by definition. lo0 sh
Shantanu Mahajan wrote:
+-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
| On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
| > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
| > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
|
| This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
| 127.
+-- Jaime [freebsd] [17-06-03 19:42 -0400]:
| On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
| > Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
| > loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
|
| This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
| 127.0.0.1.
l
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:51:59PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> 192.168.2.0 is not a valid IP address. The last number must be somewhere
> between 1 and 254 (inclusive).
Well, just to be anal about it... false.
192.168.2.0 is a perfectly valid IP address in
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
> Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0, but somehow the local
> loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
This is by definition. lo0 shouldn't ever be anything but
127.0.0.1. Also, you might want to use 192.168.0.2 instead of
192.168.2.0.
Bryan W. Maxwell wrote:
Im trying to set up my home system as 192.168.2.0,
192.168.2.0 is not a valid IP address. The last number must be somewhere
between 1 and 254 (inclusive).
but somehow the local
loop lo0 is still on 127.0.0.1.
The loopback address is always 127.0.0.1. It's not supposed to
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:50:23AM -0800, Hunt, William F wrote:
> Where can I find networking drivers for Intel silicon?
Source code for most current networking chipsets can be found in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/pci/
With very few exceptions drivers for all devices suppo
It partially depends on how the 5 switches and one hub are connected to each
other. If they 5 of the devices all connect into one central device, you're
probably safe, but if one is connected to the other and on and on, you will
have problems.
The problem is propogation delays when the devices are
Hi Christophe,
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:47, Christophe Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For one week, I have the responsability to administrate a LAN in a society
> where there's at least 5 swithes and 1 hub connected together in chain. I
> heard that plugging too many hubs or swithes in chain can cause
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:49:28PM -0600, Steven Lake wrote:
> HI all. I got a rather interesting question about networking.
> I've got two machines that I'm running. One is win2k, the other is
> FBD4.5, only one of which (the win2k machine) is on the network. The old
> Freebsd machine won
72 matches
Mail list logo